PurposeValue conflicts with the potential to elicit moral distress are among the factors that contribute to burnout and threaten nurse manager retention. Little is known about the value conflicts faced by nurse managers working in the perianesthesia environment. Using the process model of managerial dissonance and responsibility attribution as a framework of inquiry, this study explored the types of value conflicts experienced by perianesthesia nurse managers and how they worked to reduce the accompanying distress. DesignQualitative, descriptive design. MethodsData were collected by means of semi-structured interviews from 14 participants meeting inclusion criteria. Thematic analysis was used to analyze data. FindingsEleven subthemes were identified and mapped onto the four phases of process model of managerial dissonance: Phase 1 Harm Doing Event: (1) Operational management strategies, (2) Patient care management strategies, (3) Standardized organizational practices; Phase 2 Dissonance: (4) Questioning my leadership, (5) Altered well-being, (6) Just do something; Phase 3 Attribution, (7) Consider organizational viewpoint, (8) Consider role and responsibilities, and Phase 4 Outcomes, (9) Commit to act, (10) Value the organization, and (11) Forgotten by leadership. ConclusionsPerianesthesia nurse managers experience similar types of value conflicts as inpatient nurse managers; however, some aspects of their experiences reflect the uniqueness of their practice environment. The process model of managerial dissonance and responsibility attribution serves as a useful framework for understanding the psychological difficulties and processes by which nurse managers seek to resolve the distress associated with mandated actions likely to induce harm in employees. Executive leaders must act to implement strategies to mitigate the associated psychological difficulties and prevent the increased potential in nurse managers for work-role disengagement and potential exit from the organization.
Read full abstract