This paper presents a comparison between soil suction test results for a lean clay (CL) using four different measurement techniques, which included thermal conductivity sensors, in-situ psychrometers, a dew-point potentiometer and filter paper. The primary objective of these tests was to evaluate and compare the performance of these techniques and to demonstrate the sensitivity of the measured suction data to the quality of contact between the soil and the sensor, and measurement time and procedure, which could lead to orders of magnitude difference between the anticipated and measured results. The tests using a dew-point potentiometer and thermal conductivity sensors were carried out at different gravimetric water content values (referred to as moisture content in this paper) within the ranges of 10–23% and 8–24%, respectively, which were significantly above and below the optimum moisture content (OMC) of 18%. However, those using in-situ psychrometers and filter paper were carried out for moisture contents between OMC − 2% and OMC + 2%, as part of model embankment tests that were constructed at those moisture contents. Results of the study indicate that the in-situ psychrometer data were consistent with the soil water characteristic curve established using the dew-point potentiometer. However, thermal conductivity sensors and filter paper test data showed significant sensitivity to the quality of contact with the surrounding soil and measurement time and procedure, respectively, resulting in orders of magnitude deviations from the otherwise consistent in-situ psychrometer and dew-point potentiometer readings for the lean clay examined in this study. Findings of this study highlight the challenges involved, and level of care and due attention required in sensor installation and the testing procedure in order to obtain satisfactory suction data in unsaturated soils.