Modality Of Renal Replacement Therapy Research Articles

Laparoscopic peritoneal dialysis catheter insertion with omentopexy-sparing the omentum in children.

Continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis is an important modality of renal replacement therapy in children. Catheter dysfunction (commonly obstruction) is a major cause of morbidity and is a significant concern that hampers renal replacement therapy. As omentum is a significant cause of obstruction, some recommend routine omentectomy during insertion of the peritoneal dialysis catheter. Omentopexy rather than omentectomy has been described in adults to spare the omentum as it may be needed as a spare part in many conditions. Laparoscopic approach is commonly preferred as it provides global evaluation of the peritoneal space, proper location of the catheteral end in the pelvis and lesser morbidity due to inherent minimally invasive nature. The aim of this study is to present the technique of laparoscopic peritoneal dialysis catheter placement in children with concurrent omentopexy. We retrospectively evaluated our patients who underwent laparoscopic placement of peritoneal dialysis catheter with concomitant omentopexy or omentectomy. A total of 30 patients were enrolled who received either omentectomy (n = 18) or omentopexy (n = 12). Four catheters were lost in the omentopexy group (33%) and 3 in the omentectomy group (17%), but none were related to omental obstruction. Three out of 4 patients in the omentopexy group and 2 out of 3 patients in the omentectomy group had a previous abdominal operation as a potential cause of catheter loss. Previous history of abdominal surgery was present in 6 patients (50%) in the omentopexy group and 3 patients (17%) in the omentectomy group. As omentum was associated with catheter failure, omentectomy is commonly recommended. Alternatively, omentopexy can be preferred in children to spare an organ that may potentially be necessary for many surgical reconstructive procedures in the future. Laparoscopic peritoneal dialysis catheter placement with concomitant omentopexy appears as a feasable and reproducible technique. Although the catheter loss seems to be higher in the omentopexy group, none was related with the omentopexy procedure and may be related to the higher rate of history of previous abdominal operations in this group.

Development of a prognostic risk score to predict early mortality in incident elderly Japanese hemodialysis patients.

Information of short-term prognosis after hemodialysis (HD) introduction is important for elderly patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and their families choosing a modality of renal replacement therapy. Therefore, we developed a risk score to predict early mortality in incident elderly Japanese hemodialysis patients. We analyzed data of incident elderly HD patients from a nationwide cohort study of the Japanese Society for Dialysis Therapy Renal Data Registry (JRDR) to develop a prognostic risk score. Candidate risk factors for early death within 1 year was evaluated using multivariate logistic regression analysis. The risk score was developed by summing up points derived from parameter estimate values of independent risk factors. The association between risk score and early death was tested using Cox proportional hazards models. This risk score was validated twice by using an internal validation cohort derived from the JRDR and an external validation cohort collected for this study. Using the development cohort (n = 2,000), nine risk factors were retained in the risk score: older age (>85), yes = 2, no = 0; sex, male = 2, female = 0; lower body mass index (<20), yes = 2, no = 0; cancer, yes = 1, no = 0; dementia, yes = 3, no = 0; lower creatinine (<6.5 mg/dL), yes = 1, no = 0; lower albumin (<3.0 g/dL), yes = 3, no = 0; normal or high calcium (≥8.5 mg/dL), yes = 1, no = 0; and higher C reactive protein (>2.0 mg/dL), yes = 2, no = 0. In the internal and external validation cohorts (n = 739, 140, respectively), the medium- and high-risk groups (total score, 6 to 10 and 11 or more, respectively) showed significantly higher risk of early death than the low-risk group (total score, 0 to 5) (p<0.001). We developed a prognostic risk score predicting early death within 1 year in incident elderly Japanese HD patients, which may help detect elderly patients with a high-risk of early death after HD introduction.

Evaluation of hepatosteatosis and gallstone disease in patients with chronic kidney disease.

The prevalence rates of hepatosteatosis and gallstones are increasing owing to the multifactorial causes of chronic kidney disease, and the prevalence may change with the availability of different forms of renal replacement therapy. We aimed to determine the incidence or prevalence rates of hepatosteatosis, cholelithiasis, and acute cholecystitis in patients with chronic kidney disease and compare them between renal replacement therapy modalities. A total of 270 patients (90 with chronic kidney disease stages III-V, 90 undergoing peritoneal dialysis, and 90 undergoing hemodialysis) were included and categorized into the pre-dialysis, hemodialysis, and peritoneal dialysis groups. The patients were questioned about previous gallbladder surgeries and chronic diseases. The results of abdominal ultrasonography, tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging were retrospectively evaluated with respect to the findings on the hepatobiliary system. Hepatosteatosis and cholelithiasis were diagnosed by expert radiologists on the basis of abdominal ultrasonography, tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging findings. The prevalence rates of hepatosteatosis, cholelithiasis, and other liver findings were compared between the groups. Hepatosteatosis and cholelithiasis were detected in 16.7% and 21.5% of the 270 cases, respectively. Hepatosteatosis was present in 17.8%, 25.6%, and 6.7% of patients in the pre-dialysis, hemodialysis, and peritoneal dialysis groups, respectively. The prevalence of hepatosteatosis was significantly higher in patients undergoing hemodialysis than in patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis (p = 0.002). However, no statistically significant difference was found between the peritoneal dialysis and pre-dialysis groups or between the hemodialysis and pre-dialysis groups (p >0.05). The prevalence rates of cholelithiasis were 15.6%, 28.9%, and 20.0%, in the pre-dialysis, hemodialysis, and peritoneal dialysis groups, respectively, and there were no statistically significant differences among the groups. The incidence of acute cholecystitis was significantly higher in the hemodialysis group than in the pre-dialysis group (p = 0.006). Our study showed that the hepatobiliary system is frequently affected in chronic kidney disease and that the findings may differ depending on the renal replacement therapy modality.

Factors influencing renal replacement therapy modality choice from the nephrologist's perspective.

Peritoneal dialysis (PD) offers quality of life and empowerment for persons with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD). Nevertheless, theprevalence of PD is low in Belgium and Europe in general. Reimbursement, patient mix and late referral have been quoted as underlying reasons. However, to date no one-size-fits-all solution increasing uptake of PD has been successfully implemented. We aimed to understand the nephrologist's perspective, beliefs, and experiences on dialysis modality selection and to clarify underlying process-level and intrinsic motivations steering final decisions. Using purposeful sampling, Belgian nephrologists (non-/academic, geographical spread, age, gender) were selected. We conducted semi-structured interviews, and audiotapes were transcribed verbatim. Meaningful units were grouped into (sub-)themes, and a conceptual framework was developed using grounded theory according to Charmaz as guidance. Twenty-nine nephrologists were interviewed. We identified four themes: Trust and belief (in PD as a technique; own expertise, knowledge and team; in behavior of patient, family practitioner), feeling of control (paternalism; insecurity; prejudice), vision of care and approach (shared decision making; troubleshooting attitude; flexibility and creativity; complacency), and organizational issues (predialysis; access; financial; and assisted PD). Based on these interviews, it is apparent that next to already identified singular issues such as late referral, predialysis education, patient mix and financial incentives, more intrinsic factors also impact uptake of home-based therapies. These factors intertwine and relate both to process-level topics and to attitudes and culture of the nephrologists within the team.

Economic issues of treating patients with stage 5D chronic kidney disease by dialysis methods of renal replacement therapy in Ukraine: a single-center study

Background. The aim of the work was to determine the cost of treating patients with stage 5D chronic kidney disease (CKD) by dialysis methods of renal replacement therapy (RRT) in 2023 based on the analysis of the costs of using hemodialysis (HD) and peritoneal dialysis (PD) in one medical institution. Materials and methods. An open single-center study was conducted at the Кyiv City Center of Nephrology and Dialysis. During 2023, 779 patients with stage 5D chronic kidney disease received renal replacement therapy by dialysis methods in this institution. Among them, 718 participants were treated by hemodialysis and 61 patients by peritoneal dialysis (36 by continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) and 25 by automated peritoneal dialysis (APD)). Direct medical and non-medical costs were included in the calculation of the cost of treating chronic kidney disease patients using both dialysis methods. The estimate of the cost of treatment for one patient during the year was calculated according to the formula: when using hemodialysis/hemodiafiltration (HDF) method — the cost of 1 session × 156 sessions, in case of CAPD/APD — the cost of 1 treatment day × 365 days. Results. The analysis of the costs for the treatment of patients with stage 5D CKD allowed us to state that the average cost of one HD/HDF session in 2023 was 3,626.20 UAH, one day of CAPD and APD treatment was 1,539.78 and 1,829.12 UAH, respectively. The average cost of treatment of one patient by HD/HDF method during 2023 was 565,687.20 UAH, CAPD — 562,019.70 UAH, APD — 667,628.80 UAH. In the structure of the cost of treatment, regardless of the modality of RRT, the most expensive component is the cost of consumables. State reimbursement under the Program of Medical Guarantees in 2023 for the treatment of one patient with stage 5D CKD during the year was 385,788 UAH when using GD/GDF, 412,085 UAH for CAPD, 662,110 UAH for APD. That is, based on the data we received, the Program of Medical Guarantees covers only 68.2 % of the costs of medical institution for the treatment with HD/HDF, 73.3 % for the treatment with CAPD and almost 100 % for the treatment with APD. Conclusions. The real cost of treating patients with stage 5D CKD using dialysis methods of RRT is higher than the rate of state reimbursement. The Program of Medical Guarantees doesn’t fully cover the costs of medical institutions for the treatment of patients with stage 5D CKD using RRT methods. CAPD has indisputable advantages in terms of both medical and economic benefit. In addition, the advantage of using CAPD over other dialysis modalities during the war is the absence of dependence on water and electricity supply, the number and workload of medical personnel, the need for patients to constantly visit the dialysis center.

Initial renal replacement therapy (RRT) modality associates with 90-day postdischarge RRT dependence in critically ill AKI survivors

PurposeReal-world comparison of RRT modality on RRT dependence at 90 days postdischarge among ICU patients discharged alive after RRT for acute kidney injury (AKI). MethodsUsing claims-linked to US hospital discharge data (Premier PINC AI Healthcare Database [PHD]), we compared continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) vs. intermittent hemodialysis (IHD) for AKI in adult ICU patients discharged alive from January 1, 2018 to June 30, 2021. RRT dependence at 90 days postdischarge was defined as ≥2 RRT treatments in the last 8 days. Between-group differences were balanced using inverse probability treatment weighting (IPTW). ResultsOf 34,804 patients, 3804 patients (from 382 hospitals) had claims coverage for days 83–90 postdischarge. Compared to IHD-treated patients (n = 2740), CRRT-treated patients (n = 1064) were younger; had more admission to large teaching hospitals, surgery, sepsis, shock, mechanical ventilation, but lower prevalence of comorbidities (p < 0.05 for all). Compared to IHD-treated patients, CRRT-treated patients had lower RRT dependence at hospital discharge (26.5% vs. 29.8%, p = 0.04) and lower RRT dependence at 90 days postdischarge (4.9% vs. 7.4% p = 0.006) with weighted adjusted OR (95% CI): 0.68 (0.47–0.97), p = 0.03. Results persisted in sensitivity analyses including patients who died during days 1–90 postdischarge (n = 112) or excluding patients from hospitals with IHD patients only (n = 335), or when excluding patients who switched RRT modalities (n = 451). ConclusionsAdjusted for potential confounders, the odds of RRT dependence at 90 days postdischarge among survivors of RRT for AKI was 30% lower for those treated first with CRRT vs. IHD, overall and in several sensitivity analyses. SummaryCritically ill patients in intensive care units (ICU) may develop acute kidney injury (AKI) that requires renal replacement therapy (RRT) to temporarily replace the injured kidney function of cleaning the blood. Two main types of RRT in the ICU are called continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT), which is performed almost continuously, i.e., for >18 h per day, and intermittent hemodialysis (IHD), which is a more rapid RRT that is usually completed in a little bit over 6 h, several times per week. The slower CRRT may be gentler on the kidneys and is more likely to be used in the sickest patients, who may not be able to tolerate IHD. We conducted a data-analysis study to evaluate whether long-term effects on kidney function (assessed by ongoing need for RRT, i.e., RRT dependence) differ depending on use of CRRT vs. IHD. In a very large US linked hospital-discharge/claims database we found that among ICU patients discharge alive after RRT for AKI, fewer CRRT-treated patients had RRT dependence at hospital discharge (26.5% vs. 29.8%, p = 0.04) and at 90 days after discharge (4.9% vs. 7.4% p = 0.006). In adjusted models, RRT dependence at 90 days postdischarge was >30% lower for CRRT than IHD-treated patients. These results from a non-randomized study suggest that among survivors of RRT for AKI, CRRT may result in less RRT dependence 90 days after hospital discharge.

Is central venous catheter in haemodialysis still the main factor of mortality after hospitalization?

BackgroundHaemodialysis is the most frequently prescribed Renal Replacement Therapy modality worldwide. However, patients undergoing this therapy have an unpredictable evolution related to vascular access.ObjectiveTo determine the factors associated with the mortality and hospitalization rate in haemodialysis patients at a third-level care Centre in the Dominican Republic.MethodsThis was an observational and prospective study involving a cohort of 192 haemodialysis patients. The patient selection was non-probabilistic for convenience, and a direct source questionnaire was applied.ResultsOf the 192 patients in the cohort, 103 (53.6%) were hospitalized and evaluated. The most frequent cause of hospitalization was catheter-related bloodstream infections (53.4%). Almost one-third (28.2%) of the hospitalized patients died, mostly due to infections (12.6%). Of those who died 29 patients (90%) had a Central venous catheter (CVC) with a non-tunnelled catheter (NTCVC) (65.5%); having an NTC CVC makes a patient 85.5 times more likely to be hospitalized than patients with arteriovenous fistulas.ConclusionVascular access plays a predominant role in the hospitalization and mortality rates in haemodialysis. Patients with an arteriovenous fistula obtained significantly better outcomes than those with central venous catheters.

Utilization of peritoneal dialysis for ventilated COVID-19 patients with acute kidney injury

BackgroundPeritoneal dialysis for acute kidney injury is not typically a first-line option for mechanically ventilated patients in the intensive care unit. This series investigates the technical feasibility and clinical implications of bedside peritoneal dialysis catheter placement and utilization for mechanically ventilated COVID-19 patients. MethodsPatient data was retrospectively collected on patient characteristics, hospital course, fluid balance, ventilatory mechanics and associated morbidity and mortality of qualifying patients at a single center from March to April of 2020. Peritoneal dialysis catheters were inserted at bedside in the ICU for use as the primary modality of renal replacement therapy. Ventilatory mechanics were obtained prior to catheter insertion and after the first dwell. Statistics were calculated using GraphPad Prism and Excel. ResultsSeven male ventilated patients ages 52–83 were included. They were primarily Hispanic (71.43%). Comorbidities included chronic kidney disease (14.29%), hypertension (57.14%), hyperlipidemia (42.86%), and diabetes (28.57%). There were no mortalities associated the procedure. All-cause mortality at the time of data collection was 42.8%. Two patients had delayed initiation of peritoneal dialysis due to bleeding. Ventilatory mechanics before and after the first dwell did not demonstrate a significant difference in required FiO2, PEEP, tidal volumes or PaO2 to FiO2 ratios (p = 0.9172, p = 0.7398, p = 0.0924, p = 0.7227). DiscussionBedside placement of catheters was performed quickly and safely. Peritoneal dialysis was utilized for the treatment of acute kidney injury in mechanically ventilated patients with COVID-19 without significantly impacting respiratory mechanics. Peritoneal dialysis should be considered for similar ICU patients needing renal replacement therapy.

Regional Practice Variation and Outcomes in the Standard Versus Accelerated Initiation of Renal Replacement Therapy in Acute Kidney Injury (STARRT-AKI) Trial: A Post Hoc Secondary Analysis.

Among patients with severe acute kidney injury (AKI) admitted to the ICU in high-income countries, regional practice variations for fluid balance (FB) management, timing, and choice of renal replacement therapy (RRT) modality may be significant. Secondary post hoc analysis of the STandard vs. Accelerated initiation of Renal Replacement Therapy in Acute Kidney Injury (STARRT-AKI) trial (ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT02568722). One hundred-fifty-three ICUs in 13 countries. Altogether 2693 critically ill patients with AKI, of whom 994 were North American, 1143 European, and 556 from Australia and New Zealand (ANZ). None. Total mean FB to a maximum of 14 days was +7199 mL in North America, +5641 mL in Europe, and +2211 mL in ANZ (p < 0.001). The median time to RRT initiation among patients allocated to the standard strategy was longest in Europe compared with North America and ANZ (p < 0.001; p < 0.001). Continuous RRT was the initial RRT modality in 60.8% of patients in North America and 56.8% of patients in Europe, compared with 96.4% of patients in ANZ (p < 0.001). After adjustment for predefined baseline characteristics, compared with North American and European patients, those in ANZ were more likely to survive to ICU (p < 0.001) and hospital discharge (p < 0.001) and to 90 days (for ANZ vs. Europe: risk difference [RD], -11.3%; 95% CI, -17.7% to -4.8%; p < 0.001 and for ANZ vs. North America: RD, -10.3%; 95% CI, -17.5% to -3.1%; p = 0.007). Among STARRT-AKI trial centers, significant regional practice variation exists regarding FB, timing of initiation of RRT, and initial use of continuous RRT. After adjustment, such practice variation was associated with lower ICU and hospital stay and 90-day mortality among ANZ patients compared with other regions.

Demographic profile, spectrum, awareness, and cost of renal replacement therapy of chronic kidney disease patients in a public tertiary care center in Rajasthan, India

Objectives: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is widely recognized as the leading cause of death worldwide. Diabetes and hypertension are common risk factors. This is the only study on CKD from Rajasthan that highlights basic CKD profiles in patients attending public tertiary care centers. Materials and Methods: This observation study included diagnosed cases of CKD attending nephrology outpatient department (OPD) from January to December 2020. Data regarding the cause of CKD, its stage, mode of renal replacement therapy (RRT), and direct cost of medication were collected. The state runs various schemes, including free dialysis facilities for all, below-poverty level cards (below poverty line [BPL] cards, which had complete free treatment), and state health cards Bhamasha Swasthya Bima Yojana (BSSY) under the government scheme. Results: A total of 252 patients were included in the study. Patients on dialysis were highest, followed by stage V and stage IV CKD, representing 33.73%, 18.65%, and 17.86%, respectively. Hypertension was the predominant cause of CKD, representing 29.37% and CKD (u) prevalence in our study was 14.68%. The direct cost of treatment at CKD stages I, II, III, IV, and V were Rs. 520 ($6.93), Rs. 2435.71 ($32.48), Rs. 3400 ($45.33), Rs. 3405.57 ($45.41), and Rs. 4815.97 ($64.21) per month, respectively. The monthly medicine cost of treatment on hemodialysis was Rs. 6730.60 ($89.74), Rs. 30,278 ($403.71) on peritoneal dialysis, and Rs. 5021.74 ($66.96) on renal transplant. BPL card holders were 8.33%, 39.68% had BSSY card, 16.27% had Insurance, and around one-third (35.71%) were without support. Conclusion: Age, socioeconomic status, and geographical location affect CKD etiology. The accessible dialysis facility, insurance, and government policies affect the selection of the RRT.

Long-Term Mortality and Health-Related Quality of Life After Continuous Versus Intermittent Renal Replacement Therapy in ICU Survivors: A Secondary Analysis of the Quality of Life After ICU Study.

Purpose: We assessed long-term outcomes in intensive care unit (ICU) survivors with acute kidney injury (AKI) submitted to intermittent or continuous renal replacement therapy (RRT) for comparisons between groups. Methods: The multicenter prospective cohort study included 195 adult ICU survivors with an ICU stay >72 h in 10 ICUs that had at least one episode of AKI treated with intermittent RRT (IRRT) or continuous RRT (CRRT) during ICU stay. The main outcomes were mortality and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Hospital readmissions and physical dependence were also assessed. Results: Regarding RRT, 83 (42.6%) patients received IRRT and 112 (57.4%) received CRRT. Despite the similarity regarding sociodemographic characteristics, pre-ICU state of health and type of admission between groups, the risk of death (23.5% vs 42.7%; P < .001), the prevalence of sepsis (60.7%) and acute respiratory distress syndrome (17%) were higher at ICU admission among CRRT patients. The severity of critical illness was higher among CRRT patients, regarding the need for mechanical ventilation (75.0% vs 50.6%, P = .002) and vasopressors (91.1% vs 63.9%, P < .001). One year after ICU discharge, 67 of 195 ICU survivors died (34.4%) and, after adjustment for confounders, there were no significant differences in mortality when comparing IRRT and CRTT patients (34.9% vs 33.9%; P = .590), on HRQoL in both physical (41.9% vs 42.2%; P = .926) and mental dimensions (57.6% vs 56.6%; P = .340), and on the number of hospital readmissions and physical dependence. Conclusions: Our study suggests that among ICU survivors RRT modality (IRRT vs CRRT) in the ICU does not impact long-term outcomes after ICU discharge.

Terapias de reemplazo renal agudo en pacientes críticos

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is defined as the abrupt deterioration of renal excretory function, often observed in critically ill patients. The incidence of AKI worldwide ranges between 20 and 200 cases per million population. Sepsis and septic shock contribute to 25-75% of AKI cases. Regardless of the cause, loss of fluid and electrolyte homeostasis and the accumulation of nitrogenous wastes lead to uremia, hyperkalemia, water and sodium retention, and metabolic acidosis. Renal replacement therapies (RRT) aim to mitigate these effects and prevent death associated with kidney failure. There are various modalities of RRT, including intermittent hemodialysis, continuous RRT, as well as different solute elimination techniques. There have been significant advances in membrane technologies and the addition of substances to improve biocompatibility, in addition to new anticoagulation strategies. The aim of this article is to review current RRT alternatives and comment on recommendations regarding their dosage and timing for starting and discontinuing therapy.

Peri vesical and retroperitoneal vascular injury following pd catheter insertion in a child: An unusual occurrence

Abstract Peritoneal dialysis (PD) is an important modality of renal replacement therapy (RRT) in children in the acute setting. Despite the favorable outcomes of RRT, PD catheter insertions have various complications that may be related either to variations in procedural technique or infections. We report a case of a child with massive retroperitoneal and intra-abdominal bleeding secondary to injury to the inferior epigastric arterial arcade, near the urinary bladder following the insertion of a PD catheter.

Evaluation of efficacy, outcomes and safety of infant haemodialysis and ultrafiltration in clinical use: I-KID a stepped wedge cluster RCT

Abstract Background Critically unwell babies in intensive care units may develop acute renal failure. Options for renal replacement therapy are limited by their small size and available technology. Objectives To determine the clinical efficacy, outcomes and safety profile of the NIDUS® (a novel infant haemodialysis device) for babies under 8 kg, compared with current renal replacement therapy. Design A clinical investigation using a non-blinded cluster stepped wedge design with paediatric intensive care units randomised to sequences. Setting Paediatric intensive care units in six UK hospitals. Participants Children under 8 kg who required renal replacement therapy for fluid overload or biochemical disturbance. Interventions Continuous renal replacement therapy was provided by the usual methods: peritoneal dialysis and continuous haemofiltration (during control periods) and by the NIDUS (during intervention periods), a novel device designed for babies with a smaller circuit and filter and volumetric control of ultrafiltration. Main outcome measures Primary outcome was precision of ultrafiltration compared with prescription; secondary outcomes included biochemical clearances, accuracy of reported ultrafiltration and mortality. Data sources Bedside study data collected by weighing bags of fluid entering and leaving the device were entered into the study database along with case descriptors. Some secondary outcome data was collected via the Paediatric Intensive Care Audit Network. Results Ninety-seven participants were recruited by study closure, 62 to control and 35 to intervention. The primary outcome was obtained from 62 control but only 21 intervention patients, largely because of technical difficulties using NIDUS. The analysis comparing the available primary outcomes showed that ultrafiltration with NIDUS was closer to that prescribed than with control: standard deviations controls 18.75, intervention 2.95 (ml/hour), adjusted ratio 0.13, 95% confidence interval (0.03 to 0.71); p = 0.018. The mean clearances for creatinine, urea and phosphate were lower on peritoneal dialysis than NIDUS, which were in turn lower than continuous veno-venous haemofiltration. The variability in the clearances was in the same order. Of the 62 control patients, 10 died (2/62 on peritoneal dialysis; 7/13 on continuous haemofiltration) before discharge from paediatric intensive care unit (16%), compared with 12 out of 35 (34%) in the NIDUS group: p = 0.04, 95% confidence interval for difference (0 to 36%). Harms No important adverse events occurred and the NIDUS has an acceptable safety profile compared with other renal replacement therapies in this critically ill population with multi-organ failure. Mortality was lowest for Peritoneal Dialysis, highest for continuous haemofiltration, with the NIDUS in-between. Only one serious adverse device event which was reported to the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency. Conclusions NIDUS works effectively, delivering appropriate blood clearances and accurate, controllable fluid removal (ultrafiltration), indicating that it has an important place alongside other dialysis modalities for infant renal replacement therapy. Future work Findings from this study indicate some modifications are required to NIDUS to improve usability. Further studies on use of the NIDUS device in other populations of babies for example those with chronic renal failure, and long-term outcomes are required. Trial registration This trial is registered as ISRCTN 13787486. Funding This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Efficacy and Mechanism Evaluation Programme (NIHR award ref: 14/23/26) and is published in full in Efficacy and Mechanism Evaluation; Vol. 11, No. 1. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information.

One-year outcomes of percutaneous continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis catheter insertion by nephrologists: First experience from Sri Lanka

Introduction: Continuous ambulatory peritonealdialysis (CAPD) via a catheter placed in the peritoneum is an established mode of renal replacement therapy. CAPD catheters are placed using either percutaneous or surgical techniques. Percutaneous method is less invasive and avoids the need for general anaesthesia, surgical space, and expertise. This study was conducted to measure one-year outcomes of percutaneous CAPD catheter insertions performed by a nephrology team; the first experience from Sri Lanka.Methods: We retrospectively studied 96 patients in two centers, who underwent percutaneous CAPD catheter insertion over two years with a follow-up period of minimum one year. The catheter was placed using modified Seldinger technique under local anesthesia with ultrasound guidance.Results: Majority were males (78.1%) with a median age of 56 years. Most were on haemodialysis (HD) (85.4%) prior to CAPD catheter insertion. The commonest reason for opting for CAPD was to avoid hospital visits for HD (54.2%). During the follow-up of one year, 85.4% were free of complications. Frequent non-infectious complications were catheter removal (12.5%), visceral injury (4.2%), primary insertion failure (4.2%), and catheter dysfunction (2.1%). Pre-training peritonitis was found in 2.1% with an overall peritonitis rate of 0.4 episodes per patient a year. There was no significant association between catheter-related complications and gender (p=0.68), previous abdominal surgery (p=0.54), diabetes mellitus (p=0.84), and hypertension (p=0.46). One-year catheter survival was 92%.Discussion: One-year outcomes of percutaneous CAPD catheter insertion by nephrologists were efficacious and safe with low complication rates. Hence, CAPD catheter insertion by well-trained nephrologists should be encouraged. Further studies comparing percutaneous versus surgical catheter placement are warranted.

Comparison of Outcomes of Different Modalities of Renal Replacement Therapy in Patients of Acute Kidney Injury: A Single Centre Prospective Observational Study.

Acute Kidney Injury (AKI) is one of the most important causes of in-hospital mortality. The global burden of AKI continues to rise without a marked reduction in mortality. As such, the use of renal replacement therapy (RRT) forms an integral part of AKI management, especially in critically ill patients. There has been much debate over the preferred modality of RRT between continuous, intermittent and intermediate modes. While there is abundant data from Europe and North America, data from tropical countries especially the Indian subcontinent is sparse. Our study aims to provide an Indian perspective on the dialytic management of tropical AKI in a tertiary care hospital setup. 90 patients of AKI, 30 each undergoing Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy (CRRT), Intermittent Hemodialysis (IHD) and SLED (Sustained Low-Efficiency Dialysis) were included in this prospective cohort study. At the end of 28 days of hospital stay, discharge or death, outcome measures were ascertained which included mortality, duration of hospital stay, recovery of renal function and requirement of RRT after discharge. In addition median of the net change of renal parameters was also computed across the three groups. Lastly, Kaplan Meier analysis was performed to assess the probability of survival with the use of each modality of RRT. There was no significant difference in the primary outcome of mortality between the three cohorts (p=0.27). However, CRRT was associated with greater renal recovery (p= 0.015) than IHD or SLED. On the other hand, SLED and IHD were associated with a greater net reduction in blood urea (p=0.004) and serum creatinine (p=0.053). CRRT, IHD and SLED are all complementary to each other and are viable options in the treatment of AKI patients.

Kidney Transplant Recipients Show Limited Lung Diffusion Capacity but Similar Hydrogen Peroxide Exhalation as Healthy Matched Volunteers: A Pilot Study.

Patients with end-stage chronic kidney disease show higher systemic oxidative stress and exhale more hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) than healthy controls. Kidney transplantation reduces oxidative stress and H2O2 production by blood polymorphonuclear leukocytes (PMNs). Kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) may be predisposed to an impairment of lung diffusing capacity due to chronic inflammation. Lung function and H2O2 concentration in the exhaled breath condensate (EBC) were compared in 20 KTRs with stable allograft function to 20 healthy matched controls. Serum interleukin eight (IL-8) and C-reactive protein (CRP), blood cell counts, and spirometry parameters did not differ between groups. However, KTRs showed lower total lung diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide, corrected for hemoglobin concentration (TLCOc), in comparison to healthy controls (92.1 ± 11.5% vs. 102.3 ± 11.9% of predicted, p = 0.009), but similar EBC H2O2 concentration (1.63 ± 0.52 vs. 1.77 ± 0.50 µmol/L, p = 0.30). The modality of pre-transplant renal replacement therapy had no effect on TLCOc and EBC H2O2. TLCOc did not correlate with time after transplantation. In this study, TLCOc was less reduced in KTRs in comparison to previous reports. We suggest this fact and the non-elevated H2O2 exhalation exhibited by KTRs, may result perhaps from the evolution of the immunosuppressive therapy.

Peritoneal Dialysis during the COVID-19 Pandemic Is an Effective Treatment in Developing Countries: A Report from Mexico

Introduction: During the height of the coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) pandemic, some renal replacement therapy (RRT) modalities were insufficient, forcing medical centers to diversify the RRT modalities offered. In this study, we reported the outcomes of chronic peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients and acute PD in critically ill patients during COVID-19 pandemic in a tertiary care medical center in Mexico. Methods: This descriptive, longitudinal, observational, retrospective study included 47 adult patients with atypical pneumonia in a tertiary care medical center in Mexico during the first and second waves of the COVID-19 pandemic. Chronic PD patients and PD incident patients due to acute kidney injury (AKI) were included. Results: Forty-seven patients were studied (29 chronic PD patients and 18 incident PD patients due to AKI); median age was 59 (48–68) years; 63.8% were men. The ultrafiltrate volume per day was 815 (596.1–1,193.2) mL. Overall mortality was 61.7%, 55.2% in chronic PD patients, and 72.2% in PD incident patients due to AKI. A higher Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score, the need for mechanical ventilation at admission, and the requirement for vasopressors were predictors for mortality (p < 0.01). Conclusion: In low- and lower-middle-income countries, PD was a valid alternative for RRT during the COVID-19 pandemic. In AKI patients, PD can correct hyperkalemia, acidosis, uremia, and volume overload; however, there was higher mortality in PD incident patients due to AKI. The main risk factors for mortality were a high SOFA score at admission, the need for invasive mechanical ventilation, and the requirement for vasopressors.

Impact of Intensity of Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy on Duration of Ventilation in Critically Ill Patients: A Secondary Analysis of the RENAL Trial

Introduction: More intensive renal replacement therapy (RRT) has been associated with prolonged mechanical ventilation (MV). However, such finding may be dependent on RRT modality. We hypothesized that, when using continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT), RRT intensity would not be associated with prolonged MV. Methods: In a secondary analysis of the Randomized Evaluation of Normal versus Augmented Level (RENAL) Replacement trial comparing different CRRT intensities, we applied Fine-Gray competing risk analysis with time to successful extubation within 28 days as primary outcome. Results: We studied 531 patients in the higher intensity and 551 in the lower intensity group. Higher intensity patients had more hypophosphatemia (66.7 vs. 58.1%; p = 0.004) and more days with hypophosphatemia (2.2 ± 2.8 vs. 1.6 ± 2.2; p < 0.001). There was no difference in the number of patients extubated within 28 days (60.1% vs. 62.4%; adjusted subdistribution hazard ratio [SHR], 0.95 [95% CI, 0.86 to 1.06]) or time to extubation (8 [5–16] vs. 8 [5–15] days; adjusted median difference, 0.65 [95% CI, −0.41 to 1.70]). Among patients from the upper tertile of days with hypophosphatemia, higher intensity CRRT was associated with a lower chance of successful extubation within 28 days (SHR, 0.67 [95% CI, 0.55 to 0.82]; p for heterogeneity = 0.013). Conclusions: In the RENAL trial, higher intensity CRRT was not associated with delayed extubation. However, it was associated with a greater rate of hypophosphatemia and more days with hypophosphatemia was associated with a lower chance of successful extubation.

Caspofungin sequestration in a polyacrylonitrile-derived filter: Increasing the dose does not mitigate sequestration

Critically ill patients frequently require continuous renal replacement therapy. Echinocandins are recommended as first-line treatment of candidemia. Preliminary results suggested echinocandin sequestration in a polyacrylonitrile filter. The present study aimed at determining whether increasing the dose might balance sequestration. STX® filter, Baxter-Gambro was used. A liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry method was used for dosage of caspofungin. In vitro drug disposition was evaluated by NeckEpur® technology using a crystalloid medium instead of diluted/reconstituted blood, focusing on the disposition of the unbound fraction of drugs. Two concentrations were assessed. At the low dose, the mean measured initial concentration in the central compartment (CC) was 5.1 ± 0.6 mg/L. One hundred percent of the initial amount was eliminated from the CC within the 6-hour session. The mean total clearance from the CC was 9.6 ± 2.5 L/h. The mean percentages of elimination resulting from sequestration and diafiltration were 96.0 ± 5.0 and 4.0 ± 5.2%, respectively. At high dose, the mean measured initial concentration in the CC was 13.1 mg/L. One hundred percent of the initial amount was eliminated from the CC within the 6-hour session. The mean total clearance from the CC was 9.5 L/h. The mean percentages of elimination resulting from sequestration and filtration were 88.5 and 11.5%, respectively. Increasing the dose does not mitigate caspofungin sequestration in STX® filter. The results raise caution about the simultaneous use of caspofungin and polyacrylonitrile-derived filters. Intermittent modes of renal replacement therapy might be considered. For sensitive species, fluconazole might be an alternative.