Autologous Stem Cell Mobilization Research Articles

Analysis of Factors Affecting Hematopoietic Stem Cell Mobilization Efficiency and Early Hematopoietic Reconstruction Indicators during Autologous Peripheral Blood Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation.

Purpose To analyze the factors affecting the mobilization efficiency of hematopoietic stem cells and hematopoietic reconstruction indicators during autologous peripheral hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Methods The clinical data of 54 patients who underwent autologous peripheral blood hematopoietic stem cell mobilization and transplantation at Xuzhou Central Hospital from May 2016 to April 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. The gender, age, disease type, mobilization regimen, number of chemotherapy sessions, G-CSF (granulocyte colony-stimulating factor) dosage, and platelet number at the time of collection were also collected. Moreover, the relationship between these indicators with mobilization results and hematopoietic reconstruction was analyzed. Results Results showed that age, disease type, and number of collections were significantly related to the mobilization results (number of CD34+ hematopoietic stem cells). Furthermore, multivariate analysis showed that the number of collections was an independent factor affecting mobilization efficiency. Similarly, age, platelet value at the time of collection, CD34+ stem cell value during collection, white blood cell count, and number of chemotherapy times were significantly related to the time of megakaryocytic hematopoietic reconstruction. Multifactor analysis found that age and platelet count were independent factors affecting the reconstruction time of the megakaryocytic system. However, no factor was related to the time of granulocyte hematopoietic reconstruction. Conclusion Platelet count and age when collecting hematopoietic stem cells are closely related to megakaryocytic hematopoietic reconstruction and are key indicators of early hematopoietic reconstruction after autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Retrospective clinical study on cryopreservation-free integrated autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation model for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma

Objective: To explore the efficacy and safety of cryopreservation-free integrated autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) model for patients with multiple myeloma. Methods: A total of 96 patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) between July 31, 2020, and December 31, 2022, were retrospectively analyzed, of which 41 patients in the observation group received integrated non-cryopreserved transplantation mode. After hematopoietic stem cells were mobilized and collected, melphalan was started immediately for pre-transplant conditioning, and non-cryopreserved grafts from the medical blood transfusion refrigerator were directly injected intravenously into the patient within 24-48 h after the melphalan conditioning. The control group consisted of 55 patients who received traditional transplantation mode. After hematopoietic stem cells were collected, stem cell cryopreservation was performed in liquid nitrogen, and then the transplant plans were started at the right time. All patients received mobilization of autologous hematopoietic stem cells using the G-CSF combined with the plerixafor. Results: ① A total of 34 patients (82.9% ) with VGPR plus CR in the observation group were significantly higher than 33 patients (60.0% ) in the control group (P=0.016). ②Compared with the control group, the incidence of grade 1 oral mucosal inflammation was higher in the observation group (P<0.001) ; however, the incidence of grades 2 and 3 oral mucosal inflammation was lower (P=0.004, P=0.048), and neither group experienced grade 4 or above oral mucosal inflammation. The incidence of grade 1 diarrhea was higher in the observation group (P=0.002), whereas the incidence of grade 3 diarrhea was lower (P=0.007). No statistically significant difference was observed in the incidence of grade 4 diarrhea (P=0.506), and neither group experienced grade 5 diarrhea. ③ The incidence of bacterial infection in the observation group was lower than that in the control group (34.1% vs 65.5%, P=0.002), whereas no statistically significant difference was observed in the incidence of fungal infection (29.3% vs 31.4%, P=0.863) and viral infection (4.88% vs 3.64%, P=0.831). ④No statistically significant difference was observed in the implantation time of granulocytes and platelets between the observation and control groups [10 (8-20) days vs 11 (8-17) days, P=0.501; 13 (10-21) days vs 15 (10-20) days, P=0.245]. ⑤ All patients did not receive lenalidomide treatment 100 days post-transplantation. At 30 days post-transplantation, the CTL, NK, and Th cell counts in the observation group were lower than those in the control group (P<0.001, P=0.002, P=0.049), and the NKT cell counts were higher than those in the control group (P=0.024). At 100 days post-transplantation, the CTL, NKT, and Th cell counts in the observation group were higher than those in the control group (P=0.025, P=0.011, P=0.007), and no statistically significant difference in NK cell counts was observed between the two groups (P=0.396). ⑥ The median follow-up was 18 (4-33) months. The overall 2-year survival rates of the observation and control groups post-transplantation were 91.5% and 78.2%, respectively (P=0.337). The recurrence-free survival rates were 85.3% and 77.6%, respectively (P=0.386), and the cumulative recurrence rates were 9.8% and 16.9%, respectively (P=0.373) . Conclusion: In NDMM, the cryopreservation-free integrated autologous HSCT model can achieve similar therapeutic effects as traditional transplantation models, with lower rates of severe mucosal inflammation and infection compared with traditional transplantation models.

Autologous peripheral blood stem cell mobilization and apheresis in pediatric patients with cancer: A single-center report of 64 procedures.

The published experience concerning autologous peripheral blood stem cell collection in children is very limited. The data of pediatric patients who underwent autologous stem cell mobilization and apheresis between January 2011 and April 2020 were analyzed retrospectively. We studied retrospectively 64 mobilization and apheresis procedures in 48 pediatric patients (34 males, 14 females), mean age of 7.31 ± 5.38 (range, 1.5-19.7) years, the underlying disease was mostly neuroblastoma (NBL). The body weight of 21 patients (43.75%) was 15 kg or less. The targeted autologous peripheral stem cell apheresis (APSCA) was successfully achieved in 98% of patients. Neuroblastoma patients were younger than the rest of the patients and underwent apheresis after receiving fewer chemotherapy cycles than others and all of them mobilized within the first session successfully. Plerixafor was added to mobilization in nine heavily pretreated patients (18.7%), median two doses (range, 1-4 doses). 11 patients (22.9%) underwent radiotherapy (RT) before mobilization with doses of median 24 Gy (range, 10.8-54.0 Gy). Patients with RT were older at the time of apheresis and had received more chemotherapy courses than patients without RT. As a result, patients with a history of RT had significantly lower peripheral CD34+ cells and CD34+ yields than those without RT. In 17 patients (35.4%), 22 different complications were noted. The most common complications were catheter-related infections (n:10, 20.8%), followed by catheter-related thrombosis in eight patients (16.7%). Patients who had far less therapy before apheresis were more likely to mobilize successfully. Our study provides a detailed practice approach including complications during APSCA aiming to increase the success rates of apheresis in transplantation centers.

Comparison of etoposide combined with G-CSF and cyclophosphamide combined with G-CSF in the mobilization of autologous peripheral blood stem cells in patients with multiple myeloma

Objective: The effect and safety of etoposide combined with G-CSF were compared with those of cyclophosphamide combined with G-CSF in autologous peripheral blood mobilization in patients with multiple myeloma (MM) . Methods: Patients with MM who received autologous peripheral blood stem cell mobilization and collection in the Department of Hematology, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital Affiliated to Capital Medical University from January 1, 2020 to July 31, 2023 were included. A total of 134 patients were screened by propensity score matching technology according to a 1∶1 ratio. A total of 67 cases were each treated with ETO combined with G-CSF mobilization scheme (ETO group) and CTX combined with G-CSF mobilization scheme (CTX group). Their clinical data were retrospectively analyzed. Results: ①Collection results: the ETO and CTX groups [2 (1-3) d vs 2 (1-5) d; P<0.001] and CD34(+) cells [7.62×10(6) (2.26×10(6)-37.20×10(6)) /kg vs 2.73×10(6) (0.53×10(6)-9.85×10(6)) /kg; P<0.001] were collected. The success rate of collection was 100.0% (67/67) versus 76.1% (51/67) (P<0.001). Excellent rate of collection was 82.1% (55/67) versus 20.9% (14/67; P<0.001). Two patients in the ETO group switched protocols after 1 day of collection, and 11 patients in the CTX group switched protocols after 1-2 days of collection. ②Adverse reactions: granular deficiency with fever (21.5%[14/65] vs. 10.7%[6/56]; P=0.110), requiring platelet transfusion [10.7% (7/65) vs 1.8% (1/56) ; P=0.047]. ③Until the end of follow-up, 63 cases in the ETO group and 54 cases in the CTX group have undergone autologous transplantation. The median number of CD34(+) cells infused in the two groups was 4.62×10(6) (2.14×10(6)-19.89×10(6)) /kg versus 2.62×10(6) (1.12×10(6)-5.31×10(6)) /kg (P<0.001), neutrophil implantation time was 11 (9-14) d versus 11 (10-14) d (P=0.049), and platelet implantation time was 11 (0-19) d vs. 12 (0-34) d (P=0.035). One case in the CTX group experienced delayed platelet implantation. Conclusion: The mobilization scheme of etoposide combined with G-CSF requires relatively platelet transfusion, but the collection days are shortened. The collection success rate, excellent rate, and the number of CD34(+) cells obtained are high, and the neutrophil and platelet engraftment is accelerated after transplantation.

Comparison of two autologous hematopoietic stem cell mobilization strategies in patients with multiple myeloma: CE plus G-CSF versus G-CSF only: A single-center retrospective analysis.

Despite recent advances in the treatment of multiple myeloma, high-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (ASCT) remains an essential therapeutic keystone. As for the stem cell mobilization procedure, different regimens have been established, usually consisting of a cycle of chemotherapy followed by application of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF), although febrile neutropenia is a common complication. Following national guidelines, our institution decided to primarily use G-CSF only mobilization during the COVID-19 pandemic to minimize the patients' risk of infection and to reduce the burden on the health system. In this retrospective single-center analysis, the efficacy and safety of G-CSF only mobilization was evaluated and compared to a historic control cohort undergoing chemotherapy-based mobilization by cyclophosphamide and etoposide (CE) plus G-CSF. Although G-CSF only was associated with a higher need for plerixafor administration (p < .0001) and a higher number of apheresis sessions per patient (p = .0002), we were able to collect the target dose of hematopoietic stem cells in the majority of our patients. CE mobilization achieved higher hematopoietic stem cell yields (p = .0015) and shorter apheresis sessions (p < .0001) yet was accompanied by an increased risk of febrile neutropenia (p < .0001). There was no difference in engraftment after ASCT. G-CSF only mobilization is a useful option in selected patients with comorbidities and an increased risk of serious infections, especially in the wintertime or in future pandemics.

Clinical Analysis of PEG-rhG-CSF in Mobilization of Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cells in Hematological Tumors

To investigate the efficiency and optimal time of stem cell apheresis mobilized by pegylated recombinant human granulocyte colony stimulating factor (PEG-rhG-CSF) in autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) for hematological malignancies without monitoring pre-collection CD34+ cells. Forty-six patients underwent stem cell mobilization were retrospectively analyzed between August 2017 and January 2022 at the First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University. 27 patients using high dose chemotherapy combined with PEG-rhG-CSF mobilization were enrolled in the PEG-rhG-CSF group, and other 19 patients mobilized with recombinant human granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) were enrolled in G-CSF group. The mobilization and collection effects of the patients in two groups were compared. A total of 46 patients underwent 86 apheresis procedures, the median amount of mononuclear cell (MNC) in the PEG-rhG-CSF group and G-CSF group was 6.54（3.85-12.61）×108/kg and 6.15（1.13-11.58）×108/kg, respectively (P >0.05), the total CD34+ cells of the grafts were 11.44(1.33-65.02)×106/kg and 4.95(0.30-24.02)×106/kg (P < 0.05), with harvest timing of 14(10-20) days and 14(4-22) days, respectively (P >0.05). In the PEG-rhG-CSF group, there was a significant difference between the number of CD34+ cells collected when white blood cells (WBC) ≥10×109/L and WBC<10×109 /L, 19.04(2.85-65.02)×106/kg and 6.22(0.81-34.86)×106/kg, respectively (P < 0.05). Stem cells mobilization with PEG-rhG-CSF was highly efficient with a median mobilization time of 14 days. In the absence of peripheral blood CD34 monitoring, peripheral blood WBC≥10×109/L can be considered as a threshold for a single stem cell apheresis to collect sufficient stem cells.

Comparative Efficacy of Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Mobilization Regimens in Multiple Myeloma Patients

Aim. To compare the efficacy of mobilization regimens (MR) differing in their composition and intensity, with the purpose of defining the criteria to personalize the choice of MR based on clinical and hematological characteristics of multiple myeloma (MM) patients.&#x0D; Materials &amp; Methods. A retrospective analysis of the autologous hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) mobilization and autograft harvesting results was performed in 177 patients with newly diagnosed MM. The patients were divided into 4 groups. Group 1 included 62 patients with the median age of 53 years who were treated with single injection of cyclophosphamide (CF) dose 3 g/m2 as MR. Group 2 consisted of 71 patients with the median age of 58 years who received vinorelbine 35 mg/m2. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) as a monoregimen was administered to group 3 consisting of 33 patients with the median age of 55 years. Group 4 included 11 patients with the median age of 57 years who received G-CSF enhanced by plerixafor administration. G-CSF 10 µg/kg was used as MR. In all chemomobilization cases, daily G-CSF 10 µg/kg started on Day 4 from the administration of the chemotherapy drug prescribed as MR.&#x0D; Results. In the analyzed groups, the median time from MR start to the first leukocyte apheresis session was 11, 8, 5, and 5 days, respectively. On the first leukocyte apheresis day, the median CD34+ cell collection in group 3 was significantly lower than in groups 1, 2, and 4: 2.2 × 106/kg vs. 3.79 × 106/kg, 7.22 × 106/kg, and 3.9 × 106/kg, respectively. The total CD34+ cell collection after two leukocyte apheresis sessions was also the lowest in group 3 compared with groups 1, 2, and 4: 3.22 × 106/kg vs. 5.2 × 106/kg, 4.95 × 106/kg, and 7.5 × 106/kg, respectively. In the analyzed groups, the rate of mobilization with CD34+ cell collection &lt; 2.0 × 106/kg was 6.5 %, 5.6 %, 18.2 %, and 9.1 %. The evaluation of the results in all patients showed a direct correlation of CD34+ cell collection with lenalidomide administered before autologous HSC mobilization. A significant difference in CD34+ cell collection in lenalidomide recipients vs. non-recipients was reported when vinorelbine as MR and G-CSF as monoregimen (р = 0.001 and р = 0.022, respectively) were used. No significant differences were observed either with CF or G-CSF combined with plerixafor treatment.&#x0D; Conclusion. Based on the findings, age of a MM patient, comorbidities, and prior lenalidomide administration can be regarded as key criteria for choosing one of 4 MRs.

Regulatory T cells suppress myeloma-specific immunity during autologous stem cell mobilization and transplantation

AbstractAutologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is the standard of care consolidation therapy for eligible patients with myeloma but most patients eventually progress, an event associated with features of immune escape. Novel approaches to enhance antimyeloma immunity after ASCT represent a major unmet need. Here, we demonstrate that patient-mobilized stem cell grafts contain high numbers of effector CD8 T cells and immunosuppressive regulatory T cells (Tregs). We showed that bone marrow (BM)-residing T cells are efficiently mobilized during stem cell mobilization (SCM) and hypothesized that mobilized and highly suppressive BM-derived Tregs might limit antimyeloma immunity during SCM. Thus, we performed ASCT in a preclinical myeloma model with or without stringent Treg depletion during SCM. Treg depletion generated SCM grafts containing polyfunctional CD8 T effector memory cells, which dramatically enhanced myeloma control after ASCT. Thus, we explored clinically tractable translational approaches to mimic this scenario. Antibody-based approaches resulted in only partial Treg depletion and were inadequate to recapitulate this effect. In contrast, a synthetic interleukin-2 (IL-2)/IL-15 mimetic that stimulates the IL-2 receptor on CD8 T cells without binding to the high-affinity IL-2Ra used by Tregs efficiently expanded polyfunctional CD8 T cells in mobilized grafts and protected recipients from myeloma progression after ASCT. We confirmed that Treg depletion during stem cell mobilization can mitigate constraints on tumor immunity and result in profound myeloma control after ASCT. Direct and selective cytokine signaling of CD8 T cells can recapitulate this effect and represent a clinically testable strategy to improve responses after ASCT.

Clinical Study on the Efficacy and Safety of Peg Rhg CSF for Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Mobilization in Lymphoma and Multiple Myeloma：a Randomized Controlled, Multicenter Clinical Study

Introduction: PEG rhG CSF has been widely used in the prevention and treatment of bone marrow suppression after chemotherapy for a variety of tumors, but whether it can be used for lymphoma and Multiple myeloma autologous hematopoietic stem cell mobilization has no relevant clinical evidence. Therefore we carried out this randomized controlled, multicenter clinical study to evaluate the efficiency and safety of PEG-rhG-CSF in the mobilization of autologous hematopoietic stem cells for lymphoma and Multiple myeloma. Methods:This experiment selected an appropriate mobilization based on the patient's willingness and physical condition of the subjects. Chemotherapy mobilized patients underwent bone marrow mobilization when white blood cells reached their lowest point and began to rebound. The experimental group received a fixed dose of 12mg of polyethylene glycol recombinant human granulocyte stimulating factor injection (PEG-rhG-CSF) for mobilization; the control group received recombinant human granulocyte stimulating factor (rhG-CSF) 5-10μg/kg daily. Collect blood and bone marrow samples from patients daily and test white blood cells and CD34+cells every day. Record CD34+cells proportion until its qantity reached 2×10 6 proportion. The interval from mobilization to collection, the time for hematopoietic reconstruction after transplantation, and complications were also collected. Results : A total of 60 patients were included in this study, including 31 in the experimental group and 29 in the control group. There were no statistically significant differences in gender, age, disease classification, and pre harvest CD34+levels between the two groups of patients. The CD34+cells collected from both the experimental and control groups reached ≥ 2.0×10 6/kg and there was no statistically significant difference (Figure 1). There was no statistical difference between the experimental group and the control group in terms of CD34+cell collection frequency, CD34+cell count, interval from mobilization to collection time, neutrophil reconstruction time, and platelet reconstruction time. In terms of related side effects there was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of rash, fever, infection, and diarrhea between the two groups of patients. The incidence of bone pain in all patients was 15% (9/60), with 8 cases being mild and only 1 case being moderate. There was no significant statistical difference in the incidence of bone pain between the experimental group and the control group (Table 1). Conclusion : PEG-rhG-CSF is safe and effective for autologous hematopoietic stem cell mobilization in lymphoma and Multiple myeloma, and its efficacy is consistent with that of rhG CSF. However, the subcutaneous injection of rhG CSF is less frequent, which is easier for patients to accept. [Key words] PEG rhG CSF; matopoietic stem cell mobilization;ymphoma and Multiple myeloma; inical study

Safety and Efficacy of CD22/ CD19 CAR-T and Auto-HSCT “Sandwich” Strategy As Consolidation Therapy for Ph Negative B Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Introduction: Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy has a high relapse rate in B cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL). CAR T-cells target multi-antigen or CAR-T combined with other strategy may reduce the relapse post CAR-T. The main purpose of this study is to observe the safety and efficacy of CD22/CD19 CAR-T and Auto-HSCT “Sandwich” strategy in Ph negative (Ph -) B-ALL patients. Methods: A total of 19 newly diagnosed Ph - B-ALL patients were enrolled in this study (NCT05470777). These patients received induction and consolidation chemotherapy according to standard protocols. Autologous lymphocytes were collected at week 4 after induction chemotherapy. Afterwards, autologous CAR T-cells targeting CD22 and CD19 (CAR-T 1, co-stimulatory molecule was 4-1BB and infusion dose was 5×10 6/kg, respectively) were sequential infused after lymphodepletion chemotherapy with fludarabine and cytophosphamide. Autologous stem cells mobilization and collection were performed at 6-8 weeks after CAR T-cells infusion. After conditioned with modified BuCy regimen, autologous stem cells transplantation (auto-HSCT) was conducted. Sequential infusion of CD22 and CD19 CAR-T cells was performed on the second day after transplantation (CAR-T 2, co-stimulatory molecules and dose as CAR-T 1). No maintenance therapy was performed after auto-HSCT. Measurable detectable disease (MRD) was monitored by flow cytometry and IGHV leader-based next generation sequencing. Persistence of CAR T-cells were detected using real time quantitative RT-PCR (qPCR). Results: Three of the enrolled patients were Ph-like B-ALL. 10 (52.6%) patients had poor risk factors according to NCCN guidelines. Grade 1-2 cytokine release syndrome (CRS) occurred in four (21.1%) and seven (36.8%) patients after CAR-T 1 and CAR-T 2, respectively. No grade 3-4 CRS and immune effector cell associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) occurred. After CAR-T therapy, all patients achieved MRDnegative complete remission (MRD -CR). Until the last follow-up on July 1 st, 2023, the median follow-up was 16 months (range, 7 - 32 months). 84.2% of enrolled patients remain MRD -CR. Duration of continuous MRD -CR was detected in 2 patients for more than 2 years and in 9 patients for more than 1 year. The median overall survival (OS) and leukemia-free survival (LFS) in all 19 patients are not reached. Three (3/19, 15.8%) patients experienced antigen-positive relapse. One Ph-like B-ALL patient relapsed at 10 months after auto-HSCT and underwent allogeneic HSCT. Two patients with Ph - B-ALL relapsed at 5 and 6 months after auto-HSCT and were treated with blinatumomab. All of them achieved MRD -CR again after treatment. All patients are alive and CAR-T cells are detectable in all patients at the last follow-up (range, 5-28 months). Conclusions: Our preliminary study demonstrated that CD22/CD19 CAR-T and Auto-HSCT “Sandwich” strategy as a consolidation strategy showed favorable safety and efficacy in Ph - B-ALL. CD22/CD19 CAR-T resulted in deeper remission before transplantation. The new strategy may benefit patients from LFS and OS.

The Combination of Pegfilgrastim and Filgrastim Improves the Outcomes of Mobilization and Engraftment after Transplantation of Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cells for the Treatment of Lymphoma

BACKGROUND : Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is broadly utilized for the treatment of lymphoma. Autologous peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) transplantation (ASCT) requires mobilization of hematopoietic stem cell/ hematopoietic progenitor cell (HSC/HPC) in peripheral blood (PB) to collect HSCs. The high mobilization failure rate with the mobilization strategy of combining chemotherapy and filgrastim (rhG-CSF, recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor) in ASCT is one of the unresolved issues. Whether the combination of polyethylene glycol filgrastim [pegfilgrastim (PEG-FIL), PEG-rhG-CSF] and filgrastim (FIL) improves the mobilization success rate and the timing of combination therapy has not been studied. METHODS: To test the hypothesis that the combination of pegfilgrastim and filgrastim schedule has superiority, we retrospectively investigated a cohort of 107 lymphoma patients who received auto-HSCT and collection in the First Hospital of Jilin University from Jan 1st 2015 to Dec 1st 2022. These patients were categorized into PEG+FIL group and FIL group. The group of PEG+FIL received pegfilgrastim (9 mg) on the third day of the chemotherapy, followed by filgrastim (10 μg/kg/day) based on the counts of peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC). The group of FIL received filgrastim 10 μg /kg/day depending on the number PBSCs. Demographic information, laboratory results, and treatment plans were collected for these two groups of patients. RESULTS：We compared their mobilization efficacy (mononuclear cell [MNC] and CD34 + cell counts) and transplantation efficacy (days to leukocyte and platelet recovery post-transplantation). Successful ASCT mobilization was achieved in 93 patients (86.9%), with the PEG+FIL group exhibiting a higher success rate compared to the FIL group (89.2% [58/65] vs. 83.3% [35/42], p = 0.032). The PEG+FIL group also demonstrated significantly higher CD34+ cell counts [MNC: 8.9 (6.9, 11.2) vs. 7.8 (6.2, 9.8) × 10 8 cells/kg, p = 0.024; CD34 + cell count: 7.5 (5.6, 13.0) vs. 4.9 (3.2, 9.2) × 10 6 cells/kg, p = 0.008] and a lower incidence of neutropenic fever compared to the FIL group (11.8% vs. 24.3%, p = 0.038). The PEG+FIL group also demonstrated a shorter mean leukocyte recovery time in autologous stem cell transplantation than the FIL group (10.02 ± 0.73 vs. 10.9 ± 1.1 days, p &amp;lt; 0.001). To delve deeper into the safety considerations of both groups, we evaluated the advantages of each regimen and the methodologies for selecting time windows. A bone marrow aspiration and biopsy were performed on all patients before stem cell collection. Among 18 patients who had a hematopoietic area less than 30% and a fat area greater than 40%, 10 were in the PEG+FIL group and 8 in the FIL group. For patients who required only one collection, the durability was 80% in the PEG+FIL group compared to 0% in the FIL group (p &amp;lt; 0.01), indicating a superior recommendation for patients with a bone marrow hematopoietic area of less than 30%. In the PEG+FIL group, monitoring was carried out for PB CD34 + percentage and WBC count following pegfilgrastim administration, with subsequent computation of CD34 + cells in PB. Filgrastim administration was found to be optimal 5-6 days post-pegfilgrastim administration. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, relative to conventional filgrastim mobilization, the conjunctive use of pegfilgrastim and filgrastim demonstrates superior efficacy, non-inferior safety during ASCT. The schedule enhanced the the outcomes of mobilization in the patients of less hematopoietic area. KEY WORDS: Pegylated recombinant human granulocyte-stimulating factor (pegfilgrastim, PEG-rhG-CSF), recombinant human granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (filgrastim, rhG-CSF), lymphoma, hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) autologous hematopoietic stem cell mobilization.

Efficacy and Safety of Etoposide Combined with Cyclophosphamide for Autologous Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Mobilization in Patients with Multiple Myeloma

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of etoposide combined with cyclophosphamide (EC) regimen for mobilization of autologous peripheral blood stem cells (APBSCs) in patients with multiple myeloma (MM). The clinical data of 48 MM patients who received APBSC transplantation (APBSCT) in Department of Hematology of the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University from January 2015 to October 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. The mobilization success rate and mobilization optimal rate of EC regimen were counted, and its effect on transplant efficacy, adverse reactions, hematopoietic reconstitution after transplantation, and survival time of MM patients were analyzed. APBSCs were collected on day 14 (10-19) after EC administration. The median of collected CD34+ cells was 6.82 (1.27-22.57)×106/kg, and the median number of apheresis session was 2 (1-4). The mobilization success rate (collecting CD34+ cells≥2×106 cells/kg after completion of apheresis) was 98% (47/48), and mobilization optimal rate (collecting CD34+ cells≥5×106 cells/kg after completion of apheresis) was 71% (34/48). The depth of remission were improved after APBSCT, and the complete remission (CR) rate increased from 45.8% before transplantation to 87.5% after transplantation (P <0.01). There was no transplant-related death, no blood transfusion during mobilization, and no mucositis occurred in the patients. The most common complication was neutropenia, with an incidence of 75.0% (36/48). After transplantation, all the patients successfully achieved hematopoietic reconstitution. The median time to neutrophil engraftment was 10 (9-26) days, and median time to platelet engraftment was 10 (8-33) days. By the end of follow-up, both the median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) time were not reached. The 5-year estimated PFS rate and OS rate was 53.8% and 82.4%, respectively. The EC regimen for mobilization of APBSC has a high acquisition success rate and controllable adverse reactions, which can be an effective and safe mobilization regimen in MM patients.

The role of obesity on autologous bone marrow transplant and post-transplant outcomes

Background/Aim: Autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (AutoHCT), administered at high doses, has improved survival rates among patients with refractory or recurrent lymphoma and multiple myeloma (MM). However, inconsistencies in defining obesity, varying body weight ranges, and heterogeneous patient populations have been examined. Some researchers have hypothesized that significantly overweight patients face a higher risk of transplant-related complications. This study investigates the association between body mass index (BMI), obesity, and autologous peripheral stem cell mobilization. Methods: A retrospective evaluation of data from 180 patients who underwent peripheral stem cell mobilization at our clinic between 2014 and 2020 was conducted. Excluding patients under 18 years of age, the primary objective was to assess how BMI influences autologous transplant outcomes and mortality. This retrospective cohort study aimed to determine whether obesity constitutes an independent risk factor for autologous bone marrow transplantation. Results: Among the patients, the most prevalent diagnosis (47.2%) was MM, with notable differences in incidence rates across BMI categories (P=0.039). Obesity and overweight were associated with a higher incidence of MM (47.2%), whereas normal and underweight individuals had predominantly been diagnosed with DLBCL (44.2%). Significant differences in CD34 cell counts were observed among BMI groups (P=0.033). Overweight and obese individuals exhibited lower CD34 cell counts than underweight/normal groups (P=0.033). The treatment group showed significantly higher CD34 cell counts than the G-CSF alone group (P=0.046). Female gender (P=0.022), PLT engraftment (P=0.024), post-chemo-mobilization hospital-stay duration (P=0.019), and G-CSF count were identified as mortality risk factors (P=0.017). Conclusions: This investigation found no adverse correlation between mortality and weight among patients with various hematological malignancies undergoing AutoHCT. Obesity alone should not be a contraindication for proceeding with AutoHCT in clinically warranted hematological malignancy treatment, as no significant survival differences were observed among overweight, obese, and normal-weight individuals.

Efficacy and Safety of Plerixafor Combined with G-CSF for Autologous Peripheral Blood Hematopoietic Stem Cell Mobilization in Lymphoma Patients

To investigate the efficacy and safety of plerixafor combined with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) in mobilizing peripheral blood hematopoietic stem cells in patients with lymphoma. The clinical data of lymphoma patients who received autologous hematopoietic stem cell mobilization using plerixafor combined with G-CSF from January 2019 to December 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. The patients received 3 kinds of mobilization regimens: front-line steady-state mobilization, preemptive intervention, and recuse mobilization. The acquisition success rate, excellent rate of collection, and incidence of treatment-related adverse reaction were counted. The influence of sex, age, disease remission status, bone marrow involvement at diagnosis, chemotherapy lines, number of chemotherapy, platelet count and number of CD34+ cells on the day before acquisition in peripheral blood on the collection results were analyzed to identify the risk factors associated with poor stem cell collection. A total of 43 patients with lymphoma were enrolled, including 7 cases who received front-line steady-state mobilization, 19 cases who received preemptive intervention, and 17 cases who received recuse mobilization. The overall acquisition success rate was 58.1% (25/43) after use of plerixafor combined with G-CSF, and acquisition success rate of front-line steady-state mobilization, preemptive intervention, and recuse mobilization was 100%, 57.9%(11/19), and 41.2%(7/17), respectively. The excellent rate of collection was 18.6%(8/43). A total of 15 patients experienced mild to moderate treatment-related adverse reactions. The number of CD34+ cells < 5 cells/μl in peripheral blood on the day before collection was an independent risk factor affecting stem cell collection. Plerixafor combined with G-CSF is a safe and effective mobilization regimen for patients with lymphoma. The number of CD34+ cells in peripheral blood on the day before collection is an predictable index for the evaluation of stem cell collection.

Mobilization of Autologous Peripheral Blood Stem Cells (PBSC) in CD20+ Lymphoma Patients Using RICE, Granulocyte-Colony Stimulating Factor (G-CSF) and Plerixafor

RICE is salvage therapy for treating CD20+non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). It is combined with G-CSF to collect autologous peripheral blood stem cells (aPBSC). Little data exists, though, on the combination of G-CSF and Plerixafor after RICE in mobilizing adequate number of CD34 cells and the product’s immune content. We report on the results of twenty CD20+ NHL patients after RICE, G-CSF and Plerixafor were given to collect aPBSC. The median number of cells collected was 12.92 × 10&lt;sup&gt;6&lt;/sup&gt; CD34 cells/kg (range 5.44-83.76). Plerixafor toxicity included diarrhea (n = 5) and injection-site irritation (n = 1). Seventeen patients collected; fifteen patients did so in one session. Two patients with CLL/Richter or transformed follicular had positive-flow products. Addition of Plerixafor to G-CSF increased by 2.6-9 folds the number of blood CD34 cells. Sixteen patients went to ASCT, with a median of 7.29 × 10&lt;sup&gt;6&lt;/sup&gt; CD34 cells/kg infused. The median engraftment time post-ASCT for neutrophils was 12 (range 10-19), for platelets ≥20K 11 (range 0-19) and ≥50K 16.5 (range 11-42) days. There were no graft failures. In APBSC product, there was no evidence of NK or LAK lytic activity (n = 10), only LAK activity (n = 4) and both LAK and NK activity (n = 2). Blood NK activity was common on day +28 post-ASCT. There was no significant correlation between apheresis product and the number of blood immune cells post- ASCT or relapse. Addition of Plerixafor to RICE/G-CSF is well tolerated. The majority of patients collected aPBSC in one session.

Efficiency and safety analysis of Plerixafor combined with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor on autologous hematopoietic stem cell mobilization in lymphoma

Objective: To evaluate the advantages and safety of Plerixafor in combination with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) in autologous hematopoietic stem cell mobilization of lymphoma. Methods: Lymphoma patients who received autologous hematopoietic stem cell mobilization with Plerixafor in combination with G-CSF or G-CSF alone were obtained. The clinical data, the success rate of stem cell collection, hematopoietic reconstitution, and treatment-related adverse reactions between the two groups were evaluated retrospectively. Results: A total of 184 lymphoma patients were included in this analysis, including 115 cases of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (62.5%) , 16 cases of classical Hodgkin's lymphoma (8.7%) , 11 cases of follicular non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (6.0%) , 10 cases of angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma (5.4%) , 6 cases of mantle cell lymphoma (3.3%) , and 6 cases of anaplastic large cell lymphoma (3.3%) , 6 cases of NK/T-cell lymphoma (3.3%) , 4 cases of Burkitt's lymphoma (2.2%) , 8 cases of other types of B-cell lymphoma (4.3%) , and 2 cases of other types of T-cell lymphoma (1.1%) ; 31 patients had received radiotherapy (16.8%) . The patients in the two groups were recruited with Plerixafor in combination with G-CSF or G-CSF alone. The baseline clinical characteristics of the two groups were basically similar. The patients in the Plerixafor in combination with the G-CSF mobilization group were older, and the number of recurrences and third-line chemotherapy was higher. 100 patients were mobilized with G-CSF alone. The success rate of the collection was 74.0% for one day and 89.0% for two days. 84 patients in the group of Plerixafor combined with G-CSF were recruited successfully with 85.7% for one day and 97.6% for two days. The success rate of mobilization in the group of Plerixafor combined with G-CSF was substantially higher than that in the group of G-CSF alone (P=0.023) . The median number of CD34(+) cells obtained in the mobilization group of Plerixafor combined with G-CSF was 3.9×10(6)/kg. The median number of CD34(+) cells obtained in the G-CSF Mobilization group alone was 3.2×10(6)/kg. The number of CD34(+) cells collected by Plerixafor combined with G-CSF was considerably higher than that in G-CSF alone (P=0.001) . The prevalent adverse reactions in the group of Plerixafor combined with G-CSF were grade 1-2 gastrointestinal reactions (31.2%) and local skin redness (2.4%) . Conclusion: The success rate of autologous hematopoietic stem cell mobilization in lymphoma patients treated with Plerixafor combined with G-CSF is significantly high. The success rate of collection and the absolute count of CD34(+) stem cells were substantially higher than those in the group treated with G-CSF alone. Even in older patients, second-line collection, recurrence, or multiple chemotherapies, the combined mobilization method also has a high success rate of mobilization.

Analysis of Related Factors of Autologous Peripheral Hematopoietic Stem Cell Mobilization in Patients with Lymphoma and Myeloma

To explore the related factors affecting of autologous peripheral hematopoietic stem cell mobilization in patients with single center lymphoma and multiple myeloma. The clinical total of 30 patients with lymphoma or multiple myeloma who underwent autologous peripheral hematopoietic stem cell mobilization and transplantation in the Affiliated Hospital of Jiangsu University from March 2012 to December 2021 were retrospectively analyzed, including the patients' age, gender, disease type, chemotherapy course, mobilization scheme, collection times, CD34+ cell count, adverse events, days of neutrophil and platelet implantation after transplantation. The related factors affecting to the mobilization efficiency of peripheral blood stem cells was analyzed. The mobilization scheme had a significant effect on the mobilization success rate of CD34+ cells. The mobilization success rate and optimal mobilization rate of intermediate-dose VP-16+G-CSF were higher than that of high-dose VP-16+G-CSF (P<0.05); the mobilization success rate of patients with previous chemotherapy courses ≤4 was higher than that of patients with chemotherapy courses >4 (100% vs 72.22%, P<0.05); the mobilization success rate of lymphoma patients was lower than that of myeloma patients (66.67% vs 94.44%, P<0.05); the mobilization success rate of lymphoma patients who received intermediate-dose VP-16+G-CSF was higher than that received high-dose VP-16+G-CSF patients (100% vs 42.86%, P<0.05). Patients' gender, age, time from diagnosis to mobilization and disease status had no significant effect on the efficiency of stem cell mobilization. Fifteen patients (50%) had febrile neutropenia during stem cell mobilization. There was no statistical difference in the incidence of febrile neutropenia between the two mobilization schemes (P>0.05); the incidence of severe thrombocytopenia in intermediate-dose VP-16+G-CSF group was higher than that in high-dose VP-16+G-CSF group (P<0.05). There was no statistical difference in the time of granulocyte implantation and platelet implantation after stem cell transplantation in patients with different mobilization schemes (P>0.05). Mobilization regime, the number of previous chemotherapy course and disease type affect the mobilization efficiency of stem cells. Intermediate dose VP-16+G-CSF can improve the mobilization efficiency of stem cell in lymphoma patients, but should pay attention to the risk of bleeding.

Autologous Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Mobilisation Techniques, Stem Cell Yields and Practice Variation-By-Country in Patients with Myeloma Undergoing First Autologous Stem Cell Transplants in EBMT Centres between 2012 and 2021

The techniques employed to mobilise autologous peripheral blood stem cells in patients with myeloma have evolved over time and vary between countries. The most common methods are (1) Cyclophosphamide and Granulocyte - Colony Stimulating Factor (G-CSF) (Cyclophosphamide), (2) G-CSF only, (3) G-CSF and Plerixafor, and (4) Other. In general, chemotherapy, usually Cyclophosphamide, is used in Europe and single agent G-CSF in North America. We performed a retrospective analysis of the EBMT database to analyse stem cell mobilisation techniques in European patients undergoing a first ASCT for myeloma over the last decade. This data was available on a select cohort of patients for whom Med B form data had been submitted. A total of 76,923 patients received a first autologous stem cell transplant for myeloma in 501 EBMT-affiliated centres between 2012 and 2021. Detailed Stem cell mobilization data including CD34 results were available on 4,710 (M 58%: F 42%) patients from 87 centers. The Median (IQR) age was 61.3 (54.7-66.1) years. MM subtypes were IgG, IgA, Light Chain and Other in 56.6%, 19.2%, 20.8% and 3.4%, respectively. The stage at first transplant was CR, VGPR/PR, SD/MR, and Rel/Prog in 17.5%, 78.4%, 2.8% and 1.3%, respectively. The frequency of use of each of the stem cell mobilization techniques were as follows: Cyclophosphamide (n=3,017, 67.1%), G-CSF only (n=1,207, 26.9%), G-CSF + Plerixafor (n=222, 4.9%) and Other (47, 1.0%). Peripheral blood stem cells were the sole stem cell source in 4,705 (99.9%) of the transplants. The comparative median annual CD34 yields (x10e6/kg) are shown below and reveal that the yields following Cyclophosphamide-based mobilization were consistently higher (6.14-7.8) than those following either G-CSF (4.46-6.1) or G-CSF and Plerixafor (2.5-5.6). When analyzed in aggregate, the median (IQR) stem cell yields (x10e6/kg) following Cyclophosphamide, G-CSF, G-CSF and Plerixafor, and Other were 7.32 (4.9-10.14), 5.25 (3.88-7.38), 4.94 (3.42-6.85) and 4.9 (3.82-7.54), respectively. When analysed by MM subtype, there was no significant difference in yield between the IgG, IgA, Light Chain and Other categories (p=0.523). We next analyzed the median annual CD34 yields (x10e6/kg) by induction regimen (no. of pts): CTD (Cyclophosphamide, Thalidomide, Dexamethasone) (n=712) 7.56, Other (n=623) 5.86, PAD (Bortezomib, Adriamycin, Dexamethasone) (n=256) 5.8, VAD (Vincristine, Adriamycin, Dexamethasone) (n=172) 5.03, VCD (Bortezomib, Cyclophosphamide, Dexamethasone) (n=1,735) 6.21, VD (Bortezomib, Dexamethasone) (n=603) 5.97, VRD (Bortezomib, Lenalidomide, Dexamethasone) (n=811) 5.42 and VTD (Bortezomib, Thalidomide, Dexamethasone) (n=3,192) 7.12 (p<0.001), the highest yields being collected following CTD and VTD (<0.001). We finally examined mobilization trends in the seven largest countries in the dataset (France, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, Spain, Turkey, and the United Kingdom) over time. Data was available for between 9.6% and 22.8% of patients in 6 of the 7 countries; however, it was only available in 2.9% of patients from Germany. Within these clear limitations, there were wide national variations in clinical practice both over time and between countries, as shown below. Over the last decade, two-thirds of patients in EMBT centres underwent autologous stem cell collection following Cyclophosphamide and G-CSF, one quarter following single agent G-CSF and 5% following G-CSF and Plerixafor. As reported previously, yields were consistently higher following chemotherapy-based mobilization. However, we have no data on associated morbidity such as the incidence of infection, the need for hospital admission or costs. As regards the effect of prior induction regimens, the highest yields were seen in patients who had received either CTD or VTD induction, possibly reflecting less stem cell toxicity due to chemotherapy and/or deeper remissions following these regimens. Finally, limited data on trends in practice appears to show considerable variation between countries combined with significant changes in some countries over the last decade. Figure 1View largeDownload PPTFigure 1View largeDownload PPT Close modal

Despite Use of Upfront Plerixafor and G-CSF, Daratumumab Exposure Reduces Stem Cell Mobilization in Patients with Multiple Myeloma

Introduction Daratumumab is an anti-CD38 IgG1k monoclonal antibody with direct tumor killing and immunomodulatory mechanisms of action which was shown to have clinical benefits when added to the standard-of-care induction regimen in transplant eligible multiple myeloma (MM) patients. However, prior studies have indicated a potential reduction in stem cell yield in patients exposed to daratumumab prior to stem cell mobilization. Additionally, prior studies have not utilized combination mobilization regimens with G-CSF and the CXCR4 antagonist plerixafor as standard-of-care, which may overcome the deleterious effect of daratumumab. In this study, we investigated the stem cell yield of plerixafor-treated patients with daratumumab exposure compared to those without. Methods We conducted a retrospective study of patients with MM at our institution who underwent autologous stem cell mobilization and collection during first-line treatment over a 15-month period from 2021-2022. Following induction, patients underwent mobilization with a regimen of G-CSF for 5 days with plerixafor on the 4th day. Circulating CD34+ stem cells were enumerated on the 5th day, after which patients underwent approximately 20L apheresis with a collection goal of 5x106 CD34+ cells/kg of body weight. The primary endpoint of this study was the comparison of circulating CD34+ cells between patients who received daratumumab during induction and those who did not. Secondary endpoints included collection CD34+ yield and proportion who met the collection goal. Results 123 patients were included in the analysis. The median age was 65 (range: 34-77), 54% were male, and 84% were White. Twenty-two percent were stage I, 58% stage II, and 19% stage III by the Revised International Staging System. Forty-seven percent received daratumumab during induction. Of those, the median number of cycles administered was 4 (range: 1-5). Ninety percent received daratumumab in combination with bortezomib, lenalidomide and dexamethasone. The two cohorts were balanced in terms of age, gender, race, and exposure to lenalidomide, alkylators and radiation during induction. Patients with daratumumab exposure had a mean mobilization of 57.5 CD34+ cells/mcl compared to 96.4 for those without (p < 0.001). The mean CD34+ cell collection yield in 1 apheresis procedure was 6.0 x 106 cells/kg compared to 10.6 x 106 cells/kg (p < 0.001). Fifty-three percent of patients with daratumumab exposure met the collection goal compared to 80% of patients without (p < 0.001). Of the patients who did not meet the goal in one apheresis procedure, the majority were able to meet the goal with 1-3 additional days of apheresis (Figure 1). However, only 86% of patients with daratumumab exposure met the collection goal compared to 97% of those without (p < 0.001). Ten patients failed to collect 2.0 x 106 cells/kg, the institutional minimum for transplantation, 9 of which received daratumumab during induction. Eight were able to collect the minimum with an additional 1-3 days of apheresis; 2 patients required an additional mobilization procedure and collection but were able to proceed to transplantation. After adjusting for covariates including age, gender, race, weight, and exposure to lenalidomide, alkylators, and radiation, daratumumab exposure was associated with a 37.9 cells/mcl decrease in mean mobilization of CD34+ and 4.2 x 106 cells/kg decrease in CD34+ cell collection (both p < 0.001). Alkylator exposure was associated with a 43.3 cells/mcl decrease in mean mobilization of CD34+ (p = 0.040) and 4.1 x 106 cells/kg decrease in CD34+ cell collection (p = 0.057). Lenalidomide exposure was associated with a 103.4 cells/mcl decrease in mean mobilization of CD34+ (p <0.001) and 8.7 x 106 cells/kg decrease in CD34+ cell collection (p <0.001). Conclusion Inclusion of daratumumab in the induction regimen for transplant-eligible patients with MM resulted in a significant reduction in stem cell mobilization and stem cell yield, even with the use of plerixafor-containing mobilization regimens. This reduction was similar to alkylator exposure but less than lenalidomide exposure. With the increasing use of quadruplet induction regimens, the frequency of mobilization failure is likely to increase in the future and new mobilization regimens and approaches are needed to guarantee adequate cell yields without the need for additional days of apheresis and/or mobilizations. Figure 1View largeDownload PPTFigure 1View largeDownload PPT Close modal

Pushing the limits of successful mobilization of autologous hematopoietic stem cells

Pushing the limits of successful mobilization of autologous hematopoietic stem cells