Mobile-bearing Total Knee Replacement Research Articles

Biomechanical Assessment of Mobile-Bearing Total Knee Endoprostheses Using Musculoskeletal Simulation

The purpose of this computational study was to analyze the effects of different mobile-bearing (MB) total knee replacement (TKR) designs on knee joint biomechanics. A validated musculoskeletal model of the lower right extremity implanted with a cruciate-retaining fixed-bearing TKR undergoing a squat motion was adapted for three different MB TKR design variants: (I) a commercially available TKR design allowing for tibial insert rotation about the tibial tray with end stops to limit the range of rotation, (II) the same design without end stops, and (III) a multidirectional design with an additional translational degree-of-freedom (DoF) and end stops. When modeling the MB interface, two modeling strategies of different joint topologies were deployed: (1) a six DoF joint as a baseline and (2) a combined revolute-prismatic joint (two DoF joint) with end stops in both DoF. Altered knee joint kinematics for the three MB design variants were observed. The commercially available TKR design variant I yielded a deviation in internal-external rotation of the tibial insert relative to the tray up to 5° during knee flexion. Compared to the multidirectional design variant III, the other two variants revealed less femoral anterior-posterior translation by as much as 5 mm. Concerning the modeling strategies, the two DoF joint showed less computation time by 68%, 80%, and 82% for design variants I, II, and III, respectively. However, only slight differences in the knee joint kinematics of the two modeling strategies were recorded. In conclusion, knee joint biomechanics during a squat motion differed for each of the simulated MB design variants. Specific implant design elements, such as the presence of end stops, can impact the postoperative range of knee motion with regard to modeling strategy, and the two DoF joint option tested accurately replicated the results for the simulated designs with a considerably lower computation time than the six DoF joint. The proposed musculoskeletal multibody simulation framework is capable of virtually characterizing the knee joint dynamics for different TKR designs.

Survival of the low contact stress rotating platform total knee replacement is influenced by age: 1058 implants with a minimum follow-up of 10 years

BackgroundThe low contact stress (LCS) mobile-bearing total knee replacement (TKR) was designed to minimise polyethylene wear, aseptic loosening and osteolysis. However, registry data suggests there is a significantly greater revision rate associated.The primary aim of this study was to assess long-term survivorship of the LCS TKR performed at a single high-volume centre. Secondary aims were to assess survival by mechanism of failure and identify predictors of revision. MethodsDuring a 13-year period (1993–2006) 1091 LCS TKRs were performed by two senior surgeons. Thirty-three with incomplete data were excluded. The patients were retrospectively identified from an arthroplasty register. Mean age was 69 (range 30–96) years. Five hundred seventy-seven TKRs were performed in females, 481 in males. Mean follow-up was 14 years (SD 4.3). ResultsThere were 59 revisions during the study period: 14 (23.7%) for infection, 18 (30.5%) for instability, and 27 (45.8%) for polyethylene wear. Three hundred ninety-two patients died. All-cause survival at 10 years was 95% (95%CI 91.7–98.3) and at 15 years was 93% (95%CI 88.6–97.8). Survival at 10 years according to mechanism of failure was: infection 99% (95%CI 94–100%), instability 98% (95%CI 94–100%), and polyethylene wear 98% (95%CI 92–100). Of the 27 with polyethylene wear, only 19 (70.4%) had osteolysis requiring component revision, the other eight (29.6%) had polyethylene exchanges. Cox regression analysis identified younger age as the only predictor of revision (HR 0.96, 95%CI 0.94–0.99, p = 0.003), with a four percent decreased risk of revision for each increase in year of age. ConclusionsThe LCS TKR demonstrates excellent long-term survivorship with a low rate of revision for osteolysis, however this risk is increased in younger patients.

A systematic review and meta-regression of mobile-bearingversusfixed-bearing total knee replacement in 41 studies

Mobile-bearing (MB) total knee replacement (TKR) was introduced to reduce the risk of aseptic loosening and wear of polyethylene inserts. However, no consistent clinical advantages of mobile- over fixed-bearing (FB) TKR have been found. In this study we evaluated whether mobile bearings have an advantage over fixed bearings with regard to revision rates and clinical outcome scores. Furthermore, we determined which modifying variables affected the outcome. A systematic search of the literature was conducted to collect clinical trials comparing MB and FB in primary TKR. The primary outcomes were revision rates for any reason, aseptic loosening and wear. Secondary outcomes included range of movement, Knee Society score (KSS), Oxford knee score (OKS), Short-Form 12 (SF-12) score and radiological parameters. Meta-regression techniques were used to explore factors modifying the observed effect. Our search yielded 1827 publications, of which 41 studies met our inclusion criteria, comprising over 6000 TKRs. Meta-analyses showed no clinically relevant differences in terms of revision rates, clinical outcome scores or patient-reported outcome measures between MB and FB TKRs. It appears that theoretical assumptions of superiority of MB over FB TKR are not borne out in clinical practice.

Mobile- versus fixed-bearing modern total knee replacements – which is the more patella-friendly design?

ObjectivesOur study aimed to examine if a mobile-bearing total knee replacement (TKR) offered an advantage over fixed-bearing designs with respect to rates of secondary resurfacing of the patella in knees in which it was initially left unresurfaced.MethodsWe examined the 11-year report of the New Zealand Joint Registry and identified all primary TKR designs that had been implanted in > 500 knees without primary resurfacing of the patella. We examined how many of these were mobile-bearing, fixed-bearing cruciate-retaining and fixed-bearing posterior-stabilised designs. We assessed the rates of secondary resurfacing of the patella for each group and constructed Kaplan-Meier survival curves.ResultsOur study showed a significantly higher rate of revision for secondary resurfacing of the patella in the fixed-bearing posterior-stabilised TKR designs compared with either fixed-bearing cruciate-retaining or mobile-bearing designs (p = 0.001 and p = 0.036, respectively).ConclusionsThis New Zealand Registry study shows that during the last 11 years, revision procedures to resurface an unresurfaced patella in primary TKR occurred at a higher rate in fixed-bearing posterior-stabilised designs.

Modern Perceptions and Expectations Regarding Total Knee Arthroplasty

It is established that patients and surgeons share different perceptions regarding total knee replacement (TKA). This study's objective was to determine patient perceptions regarding TKA as well as the influence of the various information sources in shaping these perceptions. All patients presenting with knee pain for evaluation of TKA were offered a questionnaire. Multivariate statistical analysis correlated response and demographic variables. Approximately 81% of patients felt the main reason for TKA was to alleviate pain, whereas only 19% felt return to sports-related activities was the main reason. Approximately 37% of patients felt TKAs should last for 20 years or more, which was strongly correlated with TV, newspaper, or Internet exposure (p ≤ 0.01). Approximately 38% of respondents had heard of partial knee replacement, whereas relatively few had received information regarding patient-specific, gender-specific, mobile-bearing, or high-flexion TKA designs. Men were likelier than women to get their information from friends, family, or another patient (p = 0.04). Although most respondents perceived pain relief as the primary goal, patients getting information from the media are likelier to expect TKA to last longer than 20 years. This suggests direct-to-patient marketing with such claims as 30-year durability may influence patient perceptions regarding TKA.

Do tibiofemoral contact point and posterior condylar offset influence outcome and range of motion in a mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty?

The posterior condylar offset (PCO) and the tibiofemoral contact point (CP) have been reported as important factors that can influence range of motion and clinical outcome after total knee arthroplasty. A mobile-bearing knee implant with an anterior posterior gliding insert would in theory be more sensitive for changes in PCO and CP. For this reason, we analysed the PCO and CP and the relation with outcome and range of motion in 132 patients from a prospectively documented cohort in this type of implant. The prosthesis used was a posterior cruciate retaining AP gliding mobile-bearing total knee replacement (SAL II Sulzer Medica, Switzerland). In 132 knees, the pre- and postoperative PCO and postoperative CP were evaluated. Measurements were made on X-rays of the knee taken in approximately 90° of flexion and with less than 3-mm rotation of the femur condyles. The outcome parameters, range of motion (ROM) and the knee society score (KSS), for each knee were determined preoperatively and at 5-year follow-up. The mean KSS improved from 91 to 161 at 5-year follow-up (p < 0.001) and the mean ROM from 102 to 108 (p < 0.05). The mean PCO difference (postoperative PCO-preoperative PCO) was--0.05 mm (SD 2.15). The CP was on average 53.9% (SD 5.5%). ROM was different between the 3 PCO groups (p = 0.05): patients with 3 or more mm decrease in PCO had the best postoperative ROM (p = 0.047). There was no statistical difference between the postoperative ROM between patients with a stable PCO and those with an increased PCO. There was no correlation between the difference in PCO and the difference in ROM; R Pearson = -0.056. There was no difference in postoperative ROM or postoperative total KSS between CP <60% and CP >60%: p = 0.22, p = 0.99, for ROM and KSS, respectively. Scatter plots showed uniform clouds of values: increase or decrease in PCO and CP had no significant influence on ROM or KSS. The hypotheses that a stable PCO and a more natural CP increase postoperative ROM and improve clinical outcome could not be confirmed. On the contrary, a decreased PCO seemed to improve knee flexion. Furthermore, a relationship between PCO and CP could not be found. Prospective cohort study, Level II.

Prosthesis alignment affects axial rotation motion after total knee replacement: a prospective in vivo study combining computed tomography and fluoroscopic evaluations

BackgroundClinical consequences of alignment errors in total knee replacement (TKR) have led to the rigorous evaluation of surgical alignment techniques. Rotational alignment in the transverse plane has proven particularly problematic, with errors due to component malalignment relative to bone anatomic landmarks and an overall mismatch between the femoral and tibial components’ relative positions. Ranges of nominal rotational alignment are not well defined, especially for the tibial component and for relative rotational mismatch, and some studies advocate the use of mobile-bearing TKR to accommodate the resulting small rotation errors. However, the relationships between prosthesis rotational alignment and mobile-bearing polyethylene insert motion are poorly understood. This prospective, in vivo study evaluates whether component malalignment and mismatch affect axial rotation motions during passive knee flexion after TKR.MethodsEighty patients were implanted with mobile-bearing TKR. Rotational alignment of the femoral and tibial components was measured from postoperative CT scans. All TKR were categorized into nominal or outlier groups based on defined norms for surgical rotational alignment relative to bone anatomic landmarks and relative rotational mismatch between the femoral and tibial components. Axial rotation motion of the femoral, tibial and polyethylene bearing components was measured from fluoroscopic images acquired during passive knee flexion.ResultsAxial rotation motion was generally accomplished in two phases, dominated by polyethylene bearing rotation on the tibial component in early to mid-flexion and then femoral component rotation on the polyethylene articular surface in later flexion. Opposite rotations of the femur-bearing and bearing-baseplate articulations were evident at flexion greater than 80°. Knees with outlier alignment had lower magnitudes of axial rotation and distinct transitions from external to internal rotation during mid-flexion. Knees with femoral-tibial rotational mismatch had significantly lower total axial rotation compared to knees with nominal alignment.ConclusionsMaintaining relative rotational mismatch within ±5° during TKR provided for controlled knee axial rotation during flexion. TKR with rotational alignment outside of defined surgical norms, with either positive or negative mismatch, experienced measurable kinematic differences and presented different patterns of axial rotation motions during passive knee flexion compared to TKR with nominal mismatch. These findings support previous studies linking prosthesis rotational alignment with inferior clinical and functional outcomes.Trial RegistrationClinical Trials NCT01022099

Differences in long-term fixation between mobile-bearing and fixed-bearing knee prostheses at ten to 12 years’ follow-up

This single-blinded randomised controlled trial investigated whether one design of mobile-bearing (MB) total knee replacement (TKR) has any advantage over a fixed-bearing (FB) design on long-term fixation as measured by radiostereometry. The amount of wear underneath the mobile bearing was also evaluated. A series of 42 knees was randomised to MB or FB tibial components with appropriate polyethylene inserts and followed for between ten and 12 years, or until the death of the patient. The polyethylene in the MB group was superior in that it was gamma-irradiated in inert gas and was calcium-stearate free; the polyethylene in the FB group was gamma-irradiated in air and contained calcium stearate. In theory this should be advantageous to the wear rate of the MB group. At final follow-up the overall mean migration was 0.75 mm (SD 0.76) in the MB group and 0.66 mm (SD 0.4) in the FB group, with the FB group demonstrating more posterior tilt and the MB group more internal rotation. In the FB group there was one revision for aseptic loosening, but none in the MB group. There were no significant differences in clinical or radiological scores. For the MB group, the mean linear wear rate on the under-surface was 0.026 mm/year (SD 0.014). This was significantly smaller than the wear rate of 0.11 mm/year (SD 0.06) in the MB between femur and polyethylene (p < 0.001). Nevertheless, even in a best-case setting the mobile bearings of this TKR design had no apparent advantage in terms of fixation over the FB knee prosthesis at ten to 12 years. The wear underneath the mobile bearing was small and is unlikely to be clinically relevant.

Long-Term Comparison of Fixed-Bearing and Mobile-Bearing Total Knee Replacements in Patients Younger Than Fifty-one Years of Age with Osteoarthritis

There is limited information comparing the results of fixed-bearing total knee replacement and mobile-bearing total knee replacement in patients with osteoarthritis who are younger than fifty-one years and who have a fixed-bearing implant in one knee and a mobile-bearing implant in the other. The purpose of this study was to compare our long-term clinical and radiographic results of fixed-bearing total knee replacement and mobile-bearing total knee replacement in a group of patients from this population. We prospectively compared the results of 108 patients with osteoarthritis who were younger than fifty-one years (mean age, forty-five years) who had received a fixed-bearing prosthesis in one knee and a rotating platform mobile-bearing prosthesis in the other. The mean follow-up was 16.8 years (range, fifteen to eighteen years). The patients were assessed clinically and radiographically. Knee motion and function were assessed as a primary outcome. Patients were assessed with questionnaires, and each knee was assessed separately. Although there was significant improvement in both groups of knees, there was no significant difference between the groups (i.e., fixed-bearing and mobile-bearing knees) with regard to the mean postoperative knee motion (126° and 128°, respectively; p = 0.79), the mean Knee Society knee clinical score (95 and 94 points, respectively; p = 0.79), or the Knee Society knee functional score (84 and 85 points, respectively; p = 0.19) at the latest follow-up. In the fixed-bearing group, one knee was revised because of infection, two for aseptic loosening of the tibial component, and two because of wear of the tibial polyethylene insert. In the rotating platform mobile-bearing group, two knees were revised because of instability and one because of infection. The Kaplan-Meier survivorship for revision at 16.8 years of follow-up was 95% (95% confidence interval, 91 to 100) for the fixed-bearing prosthesis and 97% (95% confidence interval, 93 to 100) for the rotating platform mobile-bearing prosthesis. Long-term results of both fixed and mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasties were encouraging in patients who were younger than fifty-one years of age with osteoarthritis. However, we found no superiority of the mobile-bearing total knee prosthesis over the fixed-bearing total knee prosthesis.

A randomised controlled clinical trial and gait analysis of fixed- and mobile-bearing total knee replacements with a five-year follow-up

This study compared the outcome of total knee replacement (TKR) in adult patients with fixed- and mobile-bearing prostheses during the first post-operative year and at five years' follow-up, using gait parameters as a new objective measure. This double-blind randomised controlled clinical trial included 55 patients with mobile-bearing (n = 26) and fixed-bearing (n= 29) prostheses of the same design, evaluated pre-operatively and post-operatively at sixweeks, three months, six months, one year and five years. Each participant undertook two walking trials of 30 m and completed the EuroQol questionnaire, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities osteoarthritis index, Knee Society score, and visual analogue scales for pain and stiffness. Gait analysis was performed using five miniature angular rate sensors mounted on the trunk (sacrum), each thigh and calf. The study population was divided into two groups according to age (≤ 70 years versus > 70 years). Improvements in most gait parameters at five years' follow-up were greater for fixed-bearing TKRs in older patients (> 70 years), and greater for mobile-bearing TKRs in younger patients (≤ 70 years). These findings should be confirmed by an extended age controlled study, as the ideal choice of prosthesis might depend on the age of the patient at the time of surgery.

Mobility and Contact Mechanics of a Rotating Platform Total Knee Replacement

Abstract Despite their increasing clinical usage, mobile-bearing total knee replacements have not been well characterized biomechanically. An experimental and finite element analysis was done to asses the mobility and contact mechanics of a widely used rotating platform total knee replacement. Parameters that varied were axial load, condylar load allocation, flexion angle, and static versus dynamic loading. Similar results from the physical model and finite element model lend credence to the validity of the findings. The torque required to initiate rotation (static torque) was greater than that to sustain rotation (dynamic torque). At four times body weight axial load, peak resisting torque measured was 9.47 ± 0.61 and 5.51 ± 0.38 N-m, for static and dynamic torque, respectively. A 60–40 condylar load allocation produced slightly less resisting torque than the 50-50 load. For all practical purposes, the polyethylene insert rotated simultaneously with the femoral component, leading to maintenance of high contact area, desirable behavior clinically. Walking cycle simulations produced a total axial rotation range of motion of 6°. The high frictional torques observed at the mobile interface may explain why a percentage of these mobile-bearings fail to rotate under routine functional load.

The Role of Registry Data in the Evaluation of Mobile-Bearing Total Knee Arthroplasty

The conventional wisdom that a mobile-bearing design may offer a benefit compared with a fixed-bearing design in total knee arthroplasty has not been supported by evidence. We reviewed the published literature and annual registry reports of all national and regional registries to determine the differences in clinical outcomes between mobile and fixed-bearing designs. We found only single-center reports and studies with small sample sizes in the published literature. These studies did not demonstrate any advantages of mobile bearings over fixed bearings. Moreover, major national joint registries reported higher failure rates associated with mobile-bearing total knee replacement compared with fixed-bearing total knee replacement. Similar findings from a U.S. national study in a community setting suggest that mobile-bearing knees have an increased risk of revision. After harmonization of methodologies, international collaborations of registries may provide the best insight into the performance of mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty in real-world settings.

IN VIVO THREE-DIMENSIONAL KINEMATICS OF TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENTS DURING OPEN AND CLOSED KINETIC CHAIN ACTIVITIES

Measurement of the three-dimensional (3D) motions and surface kinematics of total knee replacements (TKR) during different kinetic activities helps provide necessary knowledge for a better use of these activities for rehabilitation purposes. The 3D kinematics of the knee in eight patients with posterior cruciate ligament-retaining (PCL-retaining) mobile-bearing TKR were measured during sit-to-stand, a closed kinetic chain (CKC) activity, and active knee flexion/extension, an open kinetic chain (OKC) activity, using a single-plane, 3D fluoroscopy method. Angular, translational motions as well as the contact patterns of the prosthesis components were calculated. The joint angular motion patterns were not statistically different between the OKC and CKC activities, but different contact patterns were found. The knee joint center translated more anteriorly during OKC than during CKC activities. Compared to the CKC activity, the more anterior contact positions and smaller total displacements of the medial contact in the OKC activity may indicate a greater loading in PCL and a smaller contact area on the medial tibial plateau. Rehabilitation of patients with mobile-bearing TKR may have to consider the potential negative effects of the greater loadings in the PCL and greater stresses in the medial tibial plateau when using OKC as a training exercise.

Comparison of the Low Contact Stress and Press Fit Condylar Rotating-Platform Mobile-Bearing Prostheses in Total Knee Arthroplasty

To our knowledge, no study to date has compared the clinical results of posterior cruciate-sacrificing mobile-bearing total knee replacements with those of posterior-stabilized mobile-bearing total knee replacements in the same patients. The purpose of the present study was to compare the clinical and radiographic results of these two designs. We hypothesized that the results would be better for knees treated with the posterior-stabilized mobile-bearing prosthesis. The present study consisted of a consecutive series of 107 female patients (mean age, 66.8 years) who underwent bilateral simultaneous total knee arthroplasty at the same surgical setting. All of these patients received a posterior cruciate-sacrificing mobile-bearing prosthesis in one knee and a posterior-stabilized mobile-bearing prosthesis in the contralateral knee. At the time of each follow-up (mean, 7.4 years; range, seven to 7.6 years), the patients were assessed clinically. The mean postoperative Knee Society knee score (96 compared with 97 points) and Hospital for Special Surgery knee score (93 compared with 94 points) were similar between the two groups. At the time of the latest follow-up, the average range of motion was 127.7° (range, 70° to 150°) in the knees with a posterior cruciate-sacrificing mobile-bearing prosthesis and 132.4° (range, 90° to 150°) in the knees with a posterior-stabilized mobile-bearing prosthesis. With a margin of error of the manual measurement of 5°, this difference was not significant. The estimated survival rate was 97.2% (95% confidence interval, 91% to 99%) at seven years in the posterior-cruciate sacrificing mobile-bearing prosthesis group and 98.1% (95% confidence interval, 92% to 99%) at seven years in the posterior-stabilized mobile-bearing prosthesis group. After a minimum duration of follow-up of seven years, we found no significant differences between the two groups with regard to the clinical and radiographic results, including knee range of motion.

Gait analysis and electromyography in fixed- and mobile-bearing total knee replacement: a prospective, comparative study

The theoretical superiority of mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasties (TKAs) has not yet been proven in clinical studies. The aim of the current study was to compare and to analyse in a patient population that had received either a fixed or a mobile TKA differences in gait analysis electromyography and clinical scores. In a prospective, randomized, patient- and observer-blinded clinical study, 33 patients with primary osteoarthritis of the knee were included. All patients received a Genesis II total knee replacement. Sixteen patients received a mobile and 17 a fixed-bearing cruciate retaining Genesis II TKA. Clinical and quality-of-life scores, electromyography and gait analysis were applied preoperatively and postoperatively with a follow-up of 24 months. In both groups, improvements from pre- to postoperative were detected. whereas the results of gait analysis and electromyography did not show any differences. The results from the clinical and the quality-of-life scores improved from pre- to postoperative, while the Knee Society Score showed a superiority of the mobile-bearing group (mean 159 ± 28) over the fixed-bearing group (mean 134 ± 41). No functional advantage of mobile over fixed-bearing TKA was detected, although the mobile-bearing group had better clinical results for which a reason could not be found. These results only apply to cruciate retaining mobile-bearing TKA with a bearing which allows both rotation and anteroposterior translation.

Early mechanical complications of a multidirectional mobile-bearing total knee replacement

Between April 2004 and July 2007, we performed 241 primary total knee replacements in 204 patients using the e.motion posterior cruciate-retaining, multidirectional mobile-bearing prosthesis. Of these, 100 were carried out using an image-free navigation system, and the remaining 141 with the conventional technique. We conducted a retrospective study from the prospectively collected data of these patients to assess the early results of this new mobile-bearing design. At a mean follow-up of 49 months (32 to 71), 18 knees (7.5%) had mechanical complications of which 13 required revision. Three of these had a peri-prosthetic fracture, and were removed from the study. The indication for revision in the remaining ten was loosening of the femoral component in two, tibiofemoral dislocation in three, disassociation of the polyethylene liner in four, and a broken polyethyene liner in one. There were eight further mechanically unstable knees which presented with recurrent disassociation of the polyethylene liner. There was no significant difference in the incidence of mechanical instability between the navigation-assisted procedures (8 of 99, 8.1%) and the conventionally implanted knees (10 of 139, 7.2%). In our view, the relatively high rate of mechanical complications and revision within 30 months precludes the further use of new design of knee replacement.

Sagittal plane kinematics of fixed- and mobile-bearing total knee replacements

The objective of this prospective, randomized, patient- and observer-blinded study was to analyze, in vivo, the knee joint kinematics in the sagittal plane in a patient population that had received either a fixed or a mobile TKA. Thirty-one patients (57 knees) were evaluated by means of fluoroscopy during unloaded flexion and extension against gravity as well as during step up and step down with full weight bearing. In these 31 patients, 22 fixed-bearing TKAs, 16 mobile-bearing TKAs, and 19 natural knee joints were included. Fluoroscopic radiographs were evaluated by measuring the "patella tendon angle" in relation to the knee flexion angle, as a measure of anteroposterior translation, as well as the "kinematic index," as a measure of reproducibility. During unloaded movement, fluoroscopic analysis did not show a significant difference between both types of prosthesis design and the natural knee. In the weight-bearing movement, both types of TKA designs revealed a more linear patellar tendon angle curve, with a greater angle in extension and in flexion than in the natural knees. In the mobile-bearing group, interindividual deviations from the mean during weight-bearing movements were significantly less than in the fixed-bearing group. No functional advantage of mobile-bearing TKA over fixed-bearing devices could be found. Both TKA designs showed the typical kinematics of an anterior instability. These results only apply to cruciate retaining mobile-bearing TKA with a bearing that allows both rotation and anteroposterior translation, using a sagittal plane kinematics analysis evaluated by such methodology. A possible influence of less variability of the kinematic pattern on clinical results still needs to be confirmed.

The Rotaglide mobile bearing knee arthroplasty: A 10- to 13-year review from an independent centre

The Rotaglide knee arthroplasty has a highly congruent mobile meniscal bearing allowing both rotation and antero-posterior translation. We reviewed 137 consecutive primary arthroplasties in 120 patients at mean 11.1 years (10–12.9) following surgery. No cases were lost to follow-up. Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) and American Knee Society (AKSS) scores were recorded at a review clinic. Radiographs were assessed using the Knee Society's roentgenographic evaluation system. Forty-two patients had died, leaving 78 patients (87 knees) available for review. Sixty-four patients (70 knees) were assessed at a clinic and in 14 (17 knees) clinical outcomes were obtained via telephone and their most recent radiographs were assessed. There were three cases of aseptic loosening and one deep infection requiring revision surgery. Two meniscal bearings were replaced with thicker inserts, one following bearing fracture and one following bearing dislocation. Survival at 11 years for aseptic loosening was 97.6% (95% CI 94.3 to 1.0) and survival using re-operation for any cause was 95.3% (95% CI 90.8 to 99.8). The Rotaglide mobile-bearing total knee replacement demonstrates good survivorship and outcome scores at 11 years following surgery.

Patellofemoral kinematics in mobile-bearing and fixed-bearing posterior stabilised total knee replacements: a cadaveric study

The aim was to compare the patellar kinematics in the normal knee, fixed-bearing (FB) and mobile-bearing total knee replacement (MB-TKR). The hypothesis that a mobile-bearing TKR has a more natural patellar movement was tested. Computer navigation was used to track the patella in nine whole lower extremities in the natural knee and in the same knee with a posterior stabilised FB-TKR and a posterior stabilised MB-TKR from 0° to 90° flexion. The form and position of the trochlea in the natural knee and the patellar groove of the TKR femoral component was also analysed. There were no differences between the FB and MB-TKRs. But the patella in the TKRs at flexion angles of more than 50° had a more medial tilt compared to the natural knee. The patella of the natural knee tended to rotate externally with flexion, this was not seen in both TKR types. There were no significant differences in absolute mediolateral translation nor in translation relative to the patellar groove. During flexion, the patella lost contact with its groove earlier in the TKRs. The radius of the patellar groove of the femoral component was larger. The groove extended more superiorly and less far posteriorly, it was also positioned further laterally compared to the natural knee. There are subtle kinematic differences in patellar tracking between the natural knee and a TKR presumably due to differences in the shape and position of the patellar groove. There are no kinematic differences in patellar movement between the FB- and MB-TKR.

A cemented mobile-bearing total knee replacement prevents periprosthetic loss of bone mineral density around the femoral component

Bone mineral density (BMD) around the femoral component has been reported to decrease after total knee replacement (TKR) because of stress shielding. Our aim was to determine whether a cemented mobile-bearing component reduced the post-operative loss of BMD. In our study 28 knees receiving a cemented fixed-bearing TKR were matched with 28 receiving a cemented mobile-bearing TKR. They underwent dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry, pre-operatively and at three weeks and at three, six, 12, 18 and 24 months post-operatively. The patients were not taking medication to improve the BMD. The pre-operative differences in the BMD of the femoral neck, wrist, lumbar spine and knee in the two groups were not significant. The BMD of the femur decreased postoperatively in the fixed-bearing group, but not the mobile-bearing group. The difference in the post-operative change in the BMD in the two groups was statistically significant (p < 0.05) at 18 and 24 months. Our findings show that a cemented mobile-bearing TKR has a favourable effect on the BMD of the distal femur after TKR in the short term. Further study is required to determine the long-term effects.