Abstract Study question Can we utilize a more physiological compound to induce oocyte activation in couples with history of complete/partial fertilization failure with ICSI? Summary answer Recombinant human phospholipase-C-zeta (rhPLCζ) successfully activated oocytes with same efficiency as ionomycin, consistently normalized fertilization and enhanced clinical outcomes. What is known already While ICSI overcomes most aspects of male gamete dysfunction, partial or complete fertilization failure may seldomly occur mostly due absence of sperm-specific protein, known as PLCζ, which is required to trigger oocyte activation. Assisted oocyte activation (AOA), most often performed with an antibiotic (ionomycin), activates oocytes by triggering calcium release from intracellular storage. This agent induces indiscriminate permeabilization of ooplasmic membrane-bound organelles. This action has been considered nonspecific and may have possible deleterious effects on subsequent embryo development. Therefore, we propose a physiological alternative that employs a recombinant form of PLCζ, the native protein residing in the sperm perinuclear theca. Study design, size, duration In the past 12 months, couples with poor ICSI fertilization were included. PLCζ were assessed to confirm sperm-related oocyte activation deficiency with a normal threshold of ≥ 30%. In a preliminary comparison, sibling oocytes were equally allocated to AOA by ionomycin or to rhPLCζ at time of ICSI. Fertilization, embryo development, and clinical outcomes between the two cohorts. Subsequently, we describe the clinical outcomes of couples treated solely by rhPLCζ. Participants/materials, setting, methods Thirty couples, confirmed with low level of PLCζ in the ejaculates, were offered AOA with their subsequent ICSI cycles (IRB#0712009553). Conventional AOA was performed by exposing post-ICSI oocytes to 50 µM ionomycin. The rhPLCζ-AOA method was performed by co-injecting spermatozoa with 0.4pL of a rhPLCζ (5 µg/µL) during ICSI. Chi-square tests were utilized to compare rhPLCζ-AOA versus ionomycin-AOA and rhPLCζ-AOA versus history cycles. Main results and the role of chance In the preliminary study, 9 patients were included (maternal age: 35.7 ± 6, paternal age: 36.7 ± 6). PLCζ positivity was 11.7±3.6% confirming a sperm-related oocyte activation deficiency. A total of 123 oocytes were retrieved in 9 cycles, with maturity of 78.0% (96/123). The 96 MII oocytes were allocated to be treated with ionomycin-AOA (n = 58) or rhPLCζ-AOA (n = 38). While conventional ionomycin-AOA yielded a fertilization rate at 55.2% (32/58), rhPLCζ-AOA resulted in 63.1% (24/38). Both compounds generated embryos at similar rates and one pregnancy was achieve in each cohort. On the bases of such comparable outcomes, 21 couples had 40 previous cycles that generated a fertilization rate of 18.3% (60/327), cleavage rate of 51.7% (31/60), Following the replacement of 23 embryos in 14 transfer cycles, these cycles yielded 2 clinical pregnancies, but all resulted in pregnancy loss. In the subsequent cycles with rhPLCζ-AOA (n = 32), an enhanced fertilization rate was achieved at 41.1% (116/280, P<0.00001). The treatment cycle yielded a higher cleavage rate at 80.2% (93/116, P<0.0001), and after replacing 25 embryos in 17 embryo transfer cycles, yielded 6 pregnancies and 5 of them resulted in delivered or are ongoing. Limitations, reasons for caution We demonstrated that physiological rhPLCζ-AOA achieved an excelled fertilization and clinical outcomes comparing to the traditional ionomycin method. Although further observation is needed to confirm its safety, this approach represents a more physiological method capable of achieving fertilization, higher embryo cleavage and ultimately better pregnancy outcomes. Wider implications of the findings While ICSI has gained large popularity, poor fertilization may occasionally occur. The availability of an assisted oocyte activation that utilize a native compound capable of restoring fertilization capability of the male gamete is appealing and holds great promises. Trial registration number N/A
Read full abstract