Mm For Lens Thickness Research Articles

Evaluation of repeatability and agreement of two optical biometers for intraocular lens power calculation.

The repeatability of two biometers (Lenstar-LS900 and Eyestar-900) to measure ocular parameters and intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation, and their agreement were evaluated. 134 eyes of 134 participants were measured thrice with each biometer. Axial length (AL), anterior chamber depth (ACD), lens thickness (LT) and keratometry (K) were evaluated. The IOL power was calculated using different formulas. The repeatability limit (RLimit), the mean differences (MD) and the limits of agreement (LoA) were calculated. The RLimits for all parameters were higher with Lenstar compared to Eyestar. RLimits were lower than 0.50 D except for Barrett Universal II (0.54 D) and Haigis (0.51 D) formulas with the Lenstar. Mean differences were lower than 0.01mm for AL, ACD and LT, and lower than 0.03 D for K. MD ranged from 0 to 0.02 D for all formulas except for Barrett and Hill. When dividing the sample into subgroups (short, normal and long eyes), the MDs were similar for the IOL power and were lower than 0.03 D, except for the Barrett and Hill formulas. Both biometers provide repeatable biometry and IOL power calculations. The LoA interval for the IOL power calculation was between 0.75 and 1.50D, which was similar among the subgroups.

Estimation of pupil size at iris plane and its magnification after cataract surgery.

To estimate the pupil size (at the iris plane) under photopic (PPH) and scotopic (PS) conditions after phacoemulsification with intraocular lens (IOL) implantation. This retrospective observational cohort study included 190 virgin eyes from 190 patients who underwent cataract surgery with IOL implantation. Data collected with Aladdin (Topcon), AS-OCT MS-39 (CSO), and iTrace (Tracey) were SimK, mean pupillary power at 6 mm (MPP), anterior chamber depth (ACD), lens thickness (LT), axial length (AL), lens rise (LR), PPH and PS before and after surgery at 30 days, dysfunctional lens index, and opacity grade. The position of the postoperative iris plane (PIP) was measured manually with MS-39, and a multivariate regression formula was developed to predict it. Statistical analysis was performed using Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS) (IBM). The mean and standard deviations were 42.61 ± 3.20 D for MMP at 6 mm, 3.35 ± 0.37 mm for ACD, 3.89 ± 0.18 mm for PIP (P < 0.01), 4.55 ± 0.42 mm for LT, 0.43 ± 0.24 mm for LR, and 25.91 ± 3.03 mm for AL. The mean preoperative and postoperative topographic pupil magnification was 12% and 14.22%, respectively (P < 0.01). Despite an increase in magnification, the postoperative pupil was smaller than the preoperative one both for scotopic and photopic conditions: The larger the preoperative pupil, the more it tends to reduce in the postoperative period. Analysis of the preoperative topographic pupil alone is not sufficient for a correct indication of the optical zone and total diameter of IOL to be implanted but must be correlated with biometric data. The topographic pupil, therefore, undergoes a change in magnification from the preoperative period to the postoperative period. Furthermore, the real pupil presents a modification and, in most cases, tends to be smaller postoperatively in both photopic and scotopic conditions.

Repeatability of a fully automated swept-source optical coherence tomography biometer and agreement with a low coherence reflectometry biometer

BackgroundTo evaluate the repeatability of a fully automated swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT) and its agreement with an optical low coherence reflectometry (OLCR) for several biometric parameters.MethodsIn this study, 74 eyes of 74 patients were measured using the Eyestar 900 SS-OCT and Lenstar LS 900 OLCR. Flat keratometry (K1) and steep keratometry (K2), central corneal thickness (CCT), anterior chamber depth (ACD), lens thickness (LT), and axial length (AL) were measured three times with each device. The repeatability was analyzed with the intrasubject standard deviation, coefficient of variability (CoV), and coefficient of repeatability (CoR) for each instrument. The agreement between the instruments was evaluated with Bland-Altman analysis.ResultsK1, K2 and CCT CoV values were < 0.2%, < 0.4% and < 0.55%, respectively. Higher CoV values were found for ACD and LT ranging from 0.56% to 1.74%. The lowest CoV values were found for the AL measurements (0.03% and 0.06% for the Eyestar 900 and the Lenstar LS 900, respectively). AL measurements provided the highest repeatability, measured with both CoV and CoR values, and the CCT was the parameter with the lowest repeatability. The CCT and LT measurements were statistically significant between the two biometers (P < 0.001). The interval of the limits of agreement was < 0.6 D for K1 and K2, 15.78 µm for CCT, 0.21 mm for ACD, 0.34 mm for LT, and 0.08 mm for AL.ConclusionsBoth biometers provide repeatable measurements for the different parameters analyzed and can be used interchangeably.

Agreement between a Spectral-Domain Ocular Coherence Tomography Biometer with a Swept-Source Ocular Coherence Tomography Biometer and an Optical Low-Coherence Reflectometry Biometer in Eyes with Cataract.

To assess the agreement between biometric parameters measured by a spectral-domain optical coherence tomography optical biometer device (Optopol Revo NX) with a validated swept-source biometer (IOLMaster 700) and a validated optical low-coherence reflectometry biometer (Lenstar LS 900), in cataract surgery candidates. In this prospective comparative study, 100 patients (100 eyes) who were eligible for cataract surgery were involved. Bland-Altman plots were used to assess agreement between devices for biometric parameters including axial length (AL), anterior chamber depth (ACD), lens thickness (LT), and central corneal thickness (CCT). AL measurements were successful in 82 eyes (82.0%) with Revo NX, in 91 eyes (91.0%) with Lenstar LS 900, and in 97 eyes (97.0%) with IOLMaster 700. When Revo NX was compared to IOL Master 700 and Lenstar LS 900, the mean differences were as follows: -0.02 ± 0.02 mm and -0.02 ± 0.03 mm (P = 0.313, P = 0.525) for AL, 0.01 ± 0.03 mm and 0.10 ± 0.03 mm (P = 0.691, P = 0.002) for ACD, -0.15 ± 0.03 mm and 0.001 ± 0.04 mm (P < 0.001, P = 0.95) for LT, and -2.29 ± 0.92 μm, and 0.73 ± 1.43 μm (P = 0.015, P = 0.612) for CCT. Three devices were highly correlated for AL, ACD, LT, and CCT (interclass correlation coefficient > 0.75). Bland-Altman plots showed a narrower 95% limit of agreement (-0.35 to 0.31) between Revo NX and IOLMaster 700 in measuring AL. Despite the higher measurement failure rate in eyes with cataract, the Revo NX showed very good agreement with the IOLMaster 700 and Lenstar LS 900 optical biometers in measuring AL, ACD, LT, and CCT. However, ACD and LT measurements cannot be considered interchangeable between these devices.

Predicted Refraction Variability Due to Reliability of Nine Optical Biometers for Intraocular Lens Power Calculation.

To assess the influence of reliability (repeatability and reproducibility) of eye parameter measurements on the prediction refraction by using the outcomes of nine optical biometers reported in the literature. A search was conducted in PubMed focused on the outcomes from original studies regarding reliability. The mean population of within-subject standard deviation (Sw) was estimated from the mean samples reported in the included studies. Repeatability coefficients (R) for the mean population were computed as 2.77 × Sw. The influence of reliability on the prediction refraction for eye biometric parameters, such as mean corneal power in diopters (D) (Km), anterior chamber depth (ACD), and axial length (AXL), were evaluated using a thick lens formula. The lens thickness (LT), central corneal thickness (CCT), and white-to-white (WTW) distance were also evaluated. The repeatability of optical biometers ranged from 0.19 to 0.42 D for Km, from 0.04 to 0.13 mm for ACD, from 0.03 to 0.22 mm for AXL, from 0.06 to 0.13 mm for LT, from 5.5 to 17.7 µm for CCT, and from 0.18 to 0.48 mm for WTW distance. Total prediction refraction due to repeatability ranged from 0.21 to 0.61 D, with Km the variable that caused the major part of total prediction refraction variability, followed by AXL and ACD. Reproducibility for the evaluated variables was generally inside the repeatability ranges. New optical biometers are equally reliable as earlier technologies. Special attention should be focused on Km and AXL, which explain the major part of prediction refraction variability. [J Refract Surg. 2022;38(2):120-127.].

Ultrasound, Dacryocystorhinography and Morphological Examination of Normal Eye and Lacrimal Apparatus of the Donkey (Equus asinus)

Simple SummaryThe role of the eye with lacrimal apparatus as a vital organ of the donkey’s body still needs to be emphasized. The lacrimal gland (LG) is anatomically located at the dorsolateral aspect of the orbit within the lacrimal fossa, and responsible for secretion of the aqueous portion of precorneal tear film. Tears are drained to the exterior through the nasolacrimal duct (NLD), which starts from two puncta lacrimalis at the medial canthus and opens into nasolacrimal sac, and ends by the nasolacrimal orifice (NLO) at the nostril of both sides. Congenital or acquired obstruction of this duct frequently occurs in horses and leads to epiphora. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to investigate the normal macromorphological and ultrasonographic features of the eye and lacrimal gland, as well as normal dacryocystorhinography of the donkey (Equus asinus) in Egypt. The results illustrated the ultrasonographic biometric values of the eye, as well as the shape and size of the lacrimal gland. In addition, dacryocystorhinography and normal dissecting anatomy of the lacrimal apparatus was illustrated. The results of this study may act as the baseline for proper management of conditions of the eye and lacrimal apparatus in the donkey in the future.The study investigated normal macromorphological and ultrasonographic features of the eye and lacrimal gland, as well as normal dacryocystorhinography of the donkey (Equus asinus) in Egypt. A total of 36 donkeys of different ages, weights, and sexes were included in the study: 21 live animals for ultrasonography and dacryocystorhinography, and 15 cadaver skulls for morphological anatomy of the lacrimal apparatus. The ultrasound biometric values of the eye were 33.7 ± 1.7 mm for axial globe length (AGL), 39.8 ± 2.1 mm for globe diameter (GD), 10.8 ± 0.7 mm for lens thickness (LT), 3.2 ± 0.7 mm for anterior chamber depth (ACD), and 19.3 ± 1.6 mm for vitreous chamber depth (VCD). The lacrimal gland was recognized as a hypoechogenic structure with an anechoic core, located at the dorsolateral aspect of the orbit, and ovoid in shape. The mean NLD length was 193.0 ± 9.8 mm by radiography and 206.0 ± 20.4 mm by gross assessment. One NL orifice (NLO) was noticed on each side, with a diameter of 3.0 ± 0.1 mm and located 12.1 ± 2.1 mm from the dorsal commissure of the nostril. These results may act as the baseline for proper management of conditions of the eye and lacrimal apparatus in the donkey in the future.

Validating e-norms methodology in ophthalmic biometry

ObjectiveTo validate the extrapolated norms or e-norms methodology in establishing a reference range for the biometric data used for intraocular lens power calculation.Methods and AnalysisAll measurements were performed with an...

New method to assess the accuracy of intraocular lens power calculation formulas according to ocular biometric parameters.

To develop a new method that makes it easy to detect accuracy deficiencies of any intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation formulas and to test it on 9 different formulas. IOA, Madrid, Spain. Retrospective observational case series. This study's first stage included 3519 eyes from 3519 candidates for cataract surgery for which frequency distributions for the following biometric eye parameters were computed: axial length (AL), anterior chamber depth (ACD), lens thickness (LT), white-to-white (WTW), and mean corneal radius (Rm). The resulting data for each parameter were fifth, 25th, 75th and 95th percentiles, which allowed definition of the corresponding normality range. In a second stage, the new graphic-representation method was tested for 9 different formulas in a sample of 70 eyes undergoing cataract surgery with multifocal IOL (mIOL) implantation. Normality ranges (defined as the 25th to 75th percentile interval) were 22.84 to 24.42 mm for AL, 2.86 to 3.39 mm for ACD, 4.36 to 4.88 mm for LT, 11.64 to 12.19 mm for WTW, and 7.52 to 7.87 mm for Rm, with lower sizes in women. No significant differences were found among the 9 formulas for percentage of eyes in ±0.50 diopters (D) (P = .82) or ±1.00 D (P = .97). The graphical method showed less accuracy in ±0.50 D for ACDs from 2.46 to 2.85 mm (5th to 25th percentile) for several formulas (P < .05). Nine formulas showed nonsignificant differences in the general predictability for a sample of eyes that were candidates to mIOL implantation. Predictability in this sample decreased for short ACDs.

Progression and Longitudinal Biometric Changes in Highly Myopic Eyes.

PurposeTo examine 2-year progression rate and associated biometric changes in highly myopic eyes.MethodsThis is a longitudinal, observational cohort study that included 657 participants aged 7 to 70 years with bilateral high myopia (≤−6.00 diopters [D]) and followed for 2 years. All participants underwent ocular biometry and cycloplegic refraction examinations. Main outcome measures were changes in spherical equivalent refraction (SE) and ocular biometry in the right eyes.ResultsMean age of participants was 21.6 ± 12.2 years. At baseline, mean SE was −9.82 ± 3.28 D and ocular biometric measurements were 27.40 ± 1.56 mm for axial length, 3.16 ± 0.27 mm for anterior chamber depth, 3.60 ± 0.35 mm for lens thickness, and 20.09 ± 1.50 mm for vitreous chamber depth. After 2 years of follow-up, there was a trend toward more myopia and greater axial elongation in all age groups. Younger participants (≤20 years) had significantly (P < 0.001) greater rates of myopic shift and axial elongation compared with older participants (>20 years). However, highly myopic adults aged 40 to 70 years continued to demonstrate refractive progression, particularly if they had extremely high myopia (≤−10.00 D). In the multiple regression analysis, each additional diopter of myopia at baseline was associated with a 11% higher risk of a >1.00-D/y myopic shift (odds ratio, 1.11; 95% confidence interval, 1.04–1.18; P = 0.002).ConclusionsLongitudinal data from this large Chinese cohort suggest that highly myopic eyes continue to progress in SE throughout life, with the greatest rates of progression observed in younger participants. Axial elongation rates appeared to stabilize after 20 years of age and were predominantly due to an increase in the vitreous chamber depth. Other risk factors for a myopic shift included a higher degree of myopic refraction at baseline.

An Evaluation of the IOLMaster 700.

To evaluate the repeatability and reproducibility of the Carl Zeiss Meditec IOLMaster 700, which uses swept-source optical coherence tomography technology, along with its agreement with the IOLMaster 500 and Lenstar LS 900. In a clinical practice, complete measurements were taken on one eye of 100 subjects: 51 with cataracts and 49 with clear lenses. Three sets of measurements were taken by 3 operators with three different IOLMaster 700 units, and one operator took 3 measurements with the IOLMaster 500 and the Lenstar. A random-effects model of analysis of variance was used to estimate the repeatability and reproducibility. The 95% limits of agreement (95% LoA) were calculated for all comparisons. Comparing the IOLMaster 700 and IOLMaster 500 in cataract patients, 95% LoA were -0.01 to +0.06 mm for axial length, -0.44 to +0.27 D for corneal power, and -0.18 to +0.17 mm for anterior chamber depth. Comparing the IOLMaster 700 and Lenstar for corneal thickness and lens thickness yielded 95% LoA of -4 to +13 μm and -0.26 to +0.41 mm, respectively. The repeatability and reproducibility limits for the IOLMaster 700 were ±0.014 and ±0.023 mm for axial length; ±0.26 and ±0.27 D for corneal power; ±7 and ±11 μm for corneal thickness; ±0.02 and ±0.02 mm for anterior chamber depth; and ±0.02 and ±0.05 mm for lens thickness, respectively. There was good agreement between the IOLMaster 700 and comparator instruments and superior or equivalent precision. Some differences were noted, but not considered clinically meaningful.

Repeatability assessment of biometric measurements with different refractive states and age using a swept-source biometer

ABSTRACTBackground: We aim to assess if refractive error or age may influence the repeatability of measurements using a swept-source biometer.Methods: A total of 61 subjects were evaluated with IOLMaster 700 acquiring measurements of axial length (AL), central corneal thickness (CCT), white-to-white distance (WTW), anterior aqueous depth (AQD), lens thickness (LT), and keratometry (K) readings. Repeatability was evaluated classifying the sample according to the refractive state and age by the calculation of the within-subject standard deviation (Sw), coefficient of repeatability, and intraclass correlation coefficient.Results: Very similar Sw was acquired among groups for AL, CCT, and WTW. Differences found for AQD, LT, keratometry and astigmatism among refractive and age groups were not clinically significant. Refractive groups obtained a Sw for AQD between 0.016 and 0.026, while for LT was between 0.023 and 0.029 mm. Besides, Sw showed values from 0.014 to 0.029 mm for keratometry. Age groups obtained a Sw of 0.025 and 0.016 mm for AQD, and 0.029 and 0.018 mm for LT, respectively. Sw was 0.019 vs 0.018 mm for K1, 0.014 vs 0.031 mm for K2.Conclusions: IOLMaster 700 showed good repeatability for biometric and keratometric parameters in eyes classified according to their refractive error or age.

In vivo crystalline lens measurements with novel swept-source optical coherent tomography: an investigation on variability of measurement

ObjectiveTo evaluate the reproducibility of in vivo crystalline lens measurements obtained by novel commercially available swept-source (SS) optical coherence tomography (OCT) specifically designed for anterior segment imaging.Methods and analysisOne eye...

Biometry measurements using a new large-coherence–length swept-source optical coherence tomographer

To evaluate the repeatability and reproducibility of the measurements obtained with the Argos, a new biometer with swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT), and to compare them with the results obtained with the IOLMaster 500 (partial-coherence interferometry [PCI]) and the Lenstar LS 900 (optical low-coherence reflectometry [OLCR]) biometers. Private practice, Lynwood, California, USA. Prospective observational study. All measurements were performed with the SS-OCT tomographer, the PCI biometer, and the OLCR biometer. Eyes (n = 107) were measured to evaluate the axial length (AL), central corneal thickness (CCT), aqueous depth, anterior chamber depth (ACD), lens thickness, pupil size, corneal diameter, and anterior corneal radius of curvature (RAV). Repeatability and reproducibility of the SS-OCT measurements showed comparable values and a low variation rate, with an interset mean difference of 0.01 mm for AL, 0.01 mm for CCT, 0.01 mm for aqueous depth and ACD, 0.03 mm for lens thickness, 0.10 mm for pupil size, 0.14 mm for corneal diameter, and 0.02 mm for RAV. The SS-OCT device correctly measured the AL in 96% of the cases compared with 79% for the OLCR device and 77% for the PCI device. Comparisons between the PCI device and SS-OCT device were -0.01 ± 0.05 mm for AL, -0.17 ± 0.20 mm for ACD, and -0.01 ± 0.05 mm for RAV. Comparison between the OLCR device and the SS-OCT device was 0.01 ± 0.06 mm for AL, 0.08 ± 0.15 mm for ACD, 0.00 ± 0.05 mm for RAV, 0.00 ± 0.01 mm for CCT, 0.07 ± 0.14 mm for aqueous depth, -0.23 ± 0.22 mm for lens thickness, -0.29 ± 0.53 mm for pupil size, and -0.34 ± 0.76 mm for corneal diameter. Axial length measurements with the new SS-OCT biometer were comparable to the PCI and OLCR measurements with a higher AL acquisition rate. Dr. Shammas is a consultant to Movu, Inc. Drs. Ortiz, Kim, and Chong have proprietary interest in the new technology.

Objective measurement of accommodative biometric changes using ultrasound biomicroscopy

To demonstrate that ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM) can be used for objective quantitative measurements of anterior segment accommodative changes. College of Optometry, University of Houston, Houston, Texas, USA. Prospective cross-sectional study. Anterior segment biometric changes in response to 0 to 6.0 diopters (D) of accommodative stimuli in 1.0 D steps were measured in eyes of human subjects aged 21 to 36 years. Imaging was performed in the left eye using a 35 MHz UBM (Vumax) and an A-scan ultrasound (A-5500) while the right eye viewed the accommodative stimuli. An automated Matlab image-analysis program was developed to measure the biometry parameters from the UBM images. The UBM-measured accommodative changes in anterior chamber depth (ACD), lens thickness, anterior lens radius of curvature, posterior lens radius of curvature, and anterior segment length were statistically significantly linearly correlated with accommodative stimulus demands. Standard deviations of the UBM-measured parameters were independent of the accommodative stimulus demands (ACD: 0.0176 mm; lens thickness: 0.0294 mm; anterior lens radius of curvature: 0.3350 mm; posterior lens radius of curvature: 0.1580 mm; and anterior segment length: 0.0340 mm). The mean difference between the A-scan and UBM measurements was -0.070 mm for ACD and 0.166 mm for lens thickness. Accommodating phakic eyes imaged using UBM allowed visualization of the accommodative response, and automated image analysis of the UBM images allowed reliable, objective, quantitative measurements of the accommodative intraocular biometric changes. Neither author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.

Intraocular pressure, ultrasonographic and echobiometric findings of juvenile Yacare caiman (Caiman yacare) eye

The aim was to determine the intraocular pressure (IOP), the ultrasonographic and echobiometric findings in the eyes of juvenile Yacare caiman (Caiman yacare). Twenty-two healthy caimans from a breeding farm in Brazilian Pantanal. Intraocular pressure was measured under physical restraint and topical anesthesia by applanation tonometry. Five individual measurements of each eye were recorded by the same examiner. B-mode ultrasonography was performed with a 10-MHz linear transducer, and the anterior chamber depth, lens thickness, vitreous depth, and axial globe length were measured. Unpaired and paired t-tests were used to assess data. Pearson's test was used to assess correlations between IOP and ocular structures (P<0.05). Mean±SD IOP of the 44 eyes studied was 9.56±2.69 mmHg, (range 5.4-15.6mmHg). IOP did not differ significantly between right and left eyes or between genders (P>0.05). Echobiometric measurements did not differ significantly between eyes and genders (P>0.05). Intraocular structures measured in male and female subjects were, respectively, 2.61±0.13 and 2.55±0.18mm for anterior chamber depth, 7.60±0.17 and 7.54±0.20mm for lens thickness, 6.83±0.20 and 6.90±0.22mm for vitreous chamber depth, and 17.55±0.25 and 17.54±0.29mm for axial globe length. Correlations were not observed (P>0.05). Reference values of tonometry and distances of intraocular structures of Yacare caiman were described. IOP did not correlate with echobiometric measurements in this crocodilian. The ultrasonographic appearance was similar to other domestic and wild species.

Pentacam Scheimpflug Quantitative Imaging of the Crystalline Lens and Intraocular Lens

To implement geometrical and optical distortion correction methods for anterior segment Scheimpflug images obtained with a commercially available system (Pentacam, Oculus Optikgeräte GmbH). Ray tracing algorithms were implemented to obtain corrected ocular surface geometry from the original images captured by the Pentacam's CCD camera. As details of the optical layout were not fully provided by the manufacturer, an iterative procedure (based on imaging of calibrated spheres) was developed to estimate the camera lens specifications. The correction procedure was tested on Scheimpflug images of a physical water cell model eye (with polymethylmethacrylate cornea and a commercial IOL of known dimensions) and of a normal human eye previously measured with a corrected optical and geometrical distortion Scheimpflug camera (Topcon SL-45 [Topcon Medical Systems Inc] from the Vrije University, Amsterdam, Holland). Uncorrected Scheimpflug images show flatter surfaces and thinner lenses than in reality. The application of geometrical and optical distortion correction algorithms improves the accuracy of the estimated anterior lens radii of curvature by 30% to 40% and of the estimated posterior lens by 50% to 100%. The average error in the retrieved radii was 0.37 and 0.46 mm for the anterior and posterior lens radii of curvature, respectively, and 0.048 mm for lens thickness. The Pentacam Scheimpflug system can be used to obtain quantitative information on the geometry of the crystalline lens, provided that geometrical and optical distortion correction algorithms are applied, within the accuracy of state-of-the art phakometry and biometry. The techniques could improve with exact knowledge of the technical specifications of the instrument, improved edge detection algorithms, consideration of aspheric and non-rotationally symmetrical surfaces, and introduction of a crystalline gradient index.

Repeatability, reproducibility and intersession variability of the Allergan Humphrey ultrasonic biometer.

We evaluated repeatability and reproducibility of the Allergan Humphrey model 820 ultrasonic biometer. Sixty eyes (30 subjects) free from ophthalmological abnormality were examined on two separate occasions by two experimenters, one experienced and one inexperienced. The 95% confidence limits for repeatability lie between +0.12/-0.13 mm and reproducibility between +0.15/-0.14 mm for AC depth, between +0.11/-0.13 mm and +0.12/-0.16 mm for lens thickness, between +0.17/-0.19 mm and +0.19/-0.18 mm for right axial length and between +0.26/-0.40 mm and +0.22/-0.25 mm for left axial length. The 40% gain used to measure left axial lengths produced poor retinal echospikes, which may account for reduced accuracy compared to the right eyes using 60% gain. Ten subjects (20 eyes) returned for 3 further visits and the variability over 5 sessions was examined using a two-factor ANOVA with repeated measures on one factor. There were no significant experimenter or session effects and no interaction effect. This biometer gives clinically repeatable and reproducible results and is convenient to use.