Smoke signals are traditionally used in military contexts, but in recent times, they have gained popularity among civilians. The M18 smoke grenade was designed with a highly reactive oxidizer, KClO3, and substituting it with a safer oxidizer, notably KNO3, is one way that helps provide a safer choice for civilian use. However, providing optimal formulations for both formulations helps in deciding whether KNO3 can be substituted for the traditional KClO3 oxidizer. One of the techniques for enhancing smoke formulation is the Design of Experiments (DOE). Many researchers these days are focusing on substituting the smoke chemicals for a safer option using a trial-and-error process. However, from the standpoint of environmental contamination, numerical testing to identify the most significant output causes air pollution and chemical waste, which is not only costly but also endangers sea life if not properly disposed of. Therefore, it is crucial to optimize the smoke formulation in order to decrease waste and air pollution as well as enable future mass production of the product for both military and civilian use. The purpose of this paper is to implement the mixture design tool of the DOE approach to determine the optimal formulation of smoke signals using KClO3-based formulations, as well as to provide a comparative analysis of substituting KNO3 to optimize KClO3-based formulations in terms of time and smoke emission. From the KClO3-based formulation (28.68 wt.% KClO3, 23.47 wt.% C12H22O11, 34.39 wt.% dye, and 13.46 wt.% MgCO3) with an average time of 73.43 seconds, an acceptable formulation with a data means of 73.43, substituting with KNO3 oxidizer gave an average of 80.18 seconds, in which the smoke emission was slightly thinner compared to KClO3. As a result, KNO3 can be used as an alternative oxidizer to KClO3, and the KClO3-optimized formulation can be considered a baseline for smoke formulation for future research.
Read full abstract