Mitral Valve Reoperation Research Articles

Mitral valve reoperation versus first-time surgery for mitral regurgitation: comparison of patient characteristics, type of surgery and mortality in a nationwide cohort

Abstract Background Mitral valve reoperation has been estimated to carry higher surgical risk than first-time mitral surgery. Contemporary data on this area is needed as these associations may lead to under-treatment of recurrent mitral valve disease requiring intervention. Purpose To compare patient characteristics, type of surgery, and early mortality related to mitral valve reoperation versus first-time surgery for mitral regurgitation in a nationwide setting. Methods We identified patients ≥18 years undergoing first-time surgery for mitral regurgitation 1996-2021 using Danish nationwide registries. Patients undergoing first-time surgery due to endocarditis were excluded. The study population was categorized into 1) patients who underwent first-time surgery only; 2) patients who underwent mitral reoperation. The first group was followed from date of first-time surgery, while second group was followed from date of reoperation, and baseline characteristics were defined according to their respective index dates. Mortality was examined during 180-day follow-up using the reverse Kaplan-Meier estimator and multivariate Cox analysis was used to compare mortality rates within 30 days and 180 days of follow-up. Subgroup analysis was conducted after excluding patients undergoing reoperation for infectious endocarditis (IE). Results We identified 7,470 patients; 7,058 (94.5%) underwent first-time surgery only and 412 (5.5%) underwent mitral reoperation. Compared to patients who only underwent first-time surgery, reoperated patients were younger (median age 60 vs. 67) and had fewer comorbidities at time of reoperation, Table 1. Prosthetic replacement was performed in 35.6% of first-time surgeries and 77.2% of reoperations. Mortality after 30 days was 5.2% after first-time surgery and 3.2% after reoperation, while 180-day mortality were 7.8% and 10.6%, respectively, Figure 1. Compared to first-time surgery, reoperation was associated with no significant difference in 30-day mortality (HR=0.68, 95%CI 0.39-1.19), but an increased rate of 180-day mortality (HR=1.60, 95%CI 1.17-2.19, p=0.003). After excluding patients with IE in the reoperation group (n=57), mortality was 2.8% and 8.8% after 30 and 180 days, respectively. In this subgroup, compared to first-time surgery, the 30-day rate of mortality was HR=0.61 (95%CI 0.32-1.14) and after 180 days HR=1.34 (95%CI 0.93-1.93, p=0.11). Conclusion Compared to patients who only underwent first-time mitral surgery, patients undergoing mitral reoperation were younger and had fewer comorbidities at time of reoperation. Repair was favoured for first-time surgery, while prosthetic replacement was favoured for reoperations. Compared to first-time surgery, reoperation was associated with an increased risk of 180-day mortality. Though patients undergoing reoperation for mitral valve disease are carefully selected, our findings suggest that this procedure should still be considered at high risk of an adverse outcome.Table 1Figure 1

Prevalence, characteristics, and long-term outcomes of patients with mitral annular disjunction undergoing surgery for degenerative mitral regurgitation

Abstract Background Mitral valve prolapse (MVP) is associated with progressive mitral regurgitation (MR) requiring surgical repair. A subset of patients with MVP may also suffer from malignant ventricular arrhythmias (VAs), especially in the presence of mitral annular disjunction (MAD). Purpose To assess the prevalence, associated characteristics, and long-term outcomes of patients with MVP with and without MAD undergoing mitral valve surgery for degenerative MR. Methods Patients with MVP and moderate-to-severe or severe degenerative MR undergoing mitral valve surgery between 2010-2022 at a university hospital in Sweden were included. MAD length was measured on echocardiograms at end-systole from the insertion of the posterior leaflet on the detached mitral annulus to the border of the bulging left ventricle. Patient demographics and clinical outcomes were collected from medical records. The primary endpoint consisted of VAs, defined as sustained- or non-sustained ventricular tachycardia or high burden of premature ventricular complexes causing hospitalizations or ablation or identified at Holter monitoring. Other endpoints included sudden cardiac death, all-cause mortality, new onset postoperative atrial fibrillation, stroke, mitral valve reoperation, endocarditis, new or worsened heart failure, myocardial infarction and implantation of permanent pacemaker or cardiac defibrillator. Results Of 599 patients undergoing mitral valve surgery, 96 (16%) had preoperative MAD, with a median (Q1, Q3) MAD length of 8.0 (5.0-10.0) mm. Compared with patients without MAD, patients with MAD were younger (55 vs 63 years), more likely to be female (31% vs 17%), to have diffuse myxomatous valve disease (66% vs 25%) and bileaflet prolapse (57% vs 17%). Most patients underwent mitral valve repair (84% vs 80%). No patient had residual MAD after surgical repair. At a mean follow up time of 5.8 ± 3.5 years after mitral valve repair, VAs were more common in patients with pre-operative MAD (10% vs 2% (adjusted HR 4.52, 95% CI 1.57-13.0)) (Figure 1). There were no significant differences in the risks of other clinical outcomes. Conclusions MAD was associated with almost a 5-fold increased long-term risk of VAs after mitral valve repair despite successful anatomical correction of MAD. These findings highlight the importance of increased awareness of VAs in patients with MAD also after mitral valve surgery.

Incidence and factors associated with mitral valve reoperation in patients undergoing intervention for mitral regurgitation: a nationwide cohort study

Abstract Background When intervention is needed for the treatment of mitral regurgitation, the risk of reoperation is of concern for both patients and physicians. As such, contemporary and nationwide data on the incidence and factors associated with mitral reoperation can provide crucial information to support patient education and clinical follow-up after intervention. Purpose To examine the incidence of mitral reoperation in patients operated for mitral regurgitation. Second, to assess whether reoperation rates differed according to time since surgery and identify potential factors associated with reoperation. Methods Using Danish nationwide registries, patients undergoing first-time surgery for mitral regurgitation 1996–2021 were identified. Exclusion included first-time surgery due to endocarditis. According to index surgery, the population was categorized into 1) mitral repair; 2) mechanical prosthesis; 3) bioprosthesis. Patients were followed from date of discharge. Cumulative incidence of reoperation was examined using competing risk analysis during a maximum of 20-years follow-up. Crude incidence rates of reoperation were reported from 0-6 months and for overall study period. Multivariate Cox analysis was used to examine factors associated with reoperation. Results We identified 7,063 patients: 4,680 (66.3%) with repair (72% male, median age 66), 1,273 (18.0%) with mechanical prosthesis (52% male, median age 59), and 1,110 (15.7%) with bioprosthesis (57% male, median age 74). Median follow-up was 7.2 years, 10.7 years, and 4.5 years, respectively. At end of follow-up, cumulative incidences were 7.7% for repair, 6.8% for mechanical prostheses, and 7.5% for bioprostheses. Of these, reoperation was preceded by endocarditis in 8.0%, 21.5%, and 30.4% of the respective patient groups. The cumulative incidence function demonstrates that the highest proportion of reoperations occurred within first six months, Figure 1. From 0-6 months following surgery, incidence rates per 100 person-years were 9.1 for repair, 11.7 for mechanical prostheses, and 18.4 for bioprostheses, while this was 8.6, 9.4, and 17.0, respectively for the overall study period. Factors associated with increased rate of reoperation were heart failure (HR=1.80, 95% CI 1.40-2.32), chronic renal failure (HR=1.48, 95% CI 1.11-1.98) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder (COPD) (HR=1.34, 95% CI 1.01-1.77), Figure 2. Compared to mitral repair, mechanical prostheses were associated with lower rate of reoperation (HR=0.57, 95% CI 0.42-0.78), while there was no statistically significant difference between repair and bioprostheses (HR=1.10, 95% CI 0.81-1.50). Conclusion In patients operated for mitral regurgitation, cumulative incidences of reoperation with a maximum of 20-year follow-up were 7.7% for repair, 6.8% for mechanical prostheses, and 7.5% for bioprostheses. Comorbidities such as heart failure, renal failure and COPD were associated with increased risk of reoperation.Figure 1Figure 2

Incidence and factors associated with mitral valve reoperation in patients undergoing surgery for mitral regurgitation: A nationwide cohort study

BackgroundWhen patients undergo surgery for mitral regurgitation, risk of reoperation is of concern. AimsTo examine the incidence and factors associated with mitral reoperation following surgery for mitral regurgitation according to type of surgery. MethodsPatients undergoing first-time surgery for mitral regurgitation, 1996–2021, were identified from nationwide registries. According to index surgery, the population was categorized into 1) mitral repair; 2) mechanical prostheses; 3) bioprostheses. Patients were followed from discharge with a maximum of 15 years of follow-up and cumulative incidence of reoperation was examined. Multivariable Cox analysis was used to examine factors associated with reoperation. ResultsWe identified 6958 patients: 4624 with mitral repair (72 % male, median age 66), 1250 with mechanical prosthesis (52 % male, median age 59), and 1084 with bioprosthesis (57 % male, median age 74). Cumulative incidence of reoperation was 7.3 % for repair (median 7.2 years follow-up), 6.1 % for mechanical prostheses (median 10.9 years follow-up), and 7.1 % for bioprostheses (median 4.5 years follow-up). Within first year, 22.6 % of reoperations were preceded by infective endocarditis. In long-term follow-up, bioprosthetic replacement was associated with a higher reoperation rate, while increasing age, male sex and mechanical prosthesis were associated with lower reoperation rate. ConclusionsIn patients operated for mitral regurgitation, reoperation was infrequent at approximately 7 % for all intervention types during a maximum of 15-year follow-up. In adjusted analysis, bioprosthetic replacement was associated with a higher rate of reoperation, while increasing age, male sex and mechanical prosthesis was associated with a lower rate of reoperation.

Longitudinal Outcomes Following Mitral Valve Repair for Infective Endocarditis.

Mitral valve repair is the ideal approach in managing mitral valve infective endocarditis for patients requiring surgery. However, viable repair is influenced by the extent of valve destruction and there can be technical challenges in reconstruction following debridement. Overall, data describing long-term outcomes following mitral repair of infective endocarditis are scarce. We, therefore, assessed the late outcomes of 101 consecutive patients who underwent mitral valve repair for IE at the University of Ottawa Heart Institute from 2001 to 2021. The 5- and 10-year survival rate was 80.8 ± 4.7% and 61.2 ± 9.2%, respectively. Among these 101 patients, 7 ultimately required mitral valve reoperation at a median of 5 years after their initial operation. These patients were of a mean age of 35.9 ± 7.3 years (range 22-44 years) at the time of their initial operation. The 5- and 10-year freedom from mitral valve reoperation was 93.6 ± 3.4% and 87.7 ± 5.2%, respectively. Overall, mitral valve repair can be an effective method for treating infective endocarditis with a favourable freedom from reoperation and mortality over the long term.

Mitral valve surgery in octogenarians: long-term and hemodynamic results.

Octogenarians are often denied mitral valve (MV) surgery secondary to concerns over increased perioperative morbidity and mortality. The objective of this study was to examine the outcomes of octogenarians undergoing mitral valve repair (MVr) and replacement (MVR). The outcomes of 139 patients between the ages of 80-90 who underwent MVR/MVr between 2004-2018 at the Mazankowski Alberta Heart Institute (Edmonton, AB, Canada) were retrospectively analyzed. Follow-up was extended to a maximum of 15.8 years. Following MVR, all-cause mortality at 30 days, 1 year, 5 years, 10 years, and the longest follow-up was 7%, 14%, 36.3%, 61.8%, and 67.7%, respectively. Post-MVr, all-cause mortality at the same time points was 1.9%, 7.6%, 22.5%, 55.5%, and 100%, respectively. During the Hospitalization Index, rates of new-onset atrial fibrillation, sepsis, acute kidney injury, superficial sternal wound infection, deep sternal wound infection, mediastinal bleeding, and permanent pacemaker insertion ranged from 22.1-34.0%, 3.8-11.0%, 7.6-22.0%, 1.9-2.4%, 0-1.2%, 0%, and 0-6.1%, respectively. Rates of overall rehospitalization, as well as readmission for heart failure, stroke, myocardial infarction, and MV reoperation ranged from 71.0-85.5%, 52.2-63.3%, 10.9-22.8%, 1.9-6.0%, and 0% during the follow-up period. There were significant reductions in peak MV gradient (P=0.042) and left ventricular internal diameter in diastole (LVIDd; P=0.008) post-MVR, as well as LVIDd (P<0.001) and Left Atrial (LA) Volume Index (P=0.019) post-MVr. Octogenarians exhibit positive left atrial and left ventricular remodeling following MVR. Perioperative morbidity is low, late survival is reasonable, and long-term morbidity is considerable. Overall, these results add to the growing literature that MV surgery is relatively safe and effective in octogenarians.

Hypothermic Ventricular Fibrillation in Redo Minimally Invasive Mitral Valve Surgery: A Promising Solution for a Surgical Challenge.

Background: Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery (MIMVS) is a treatment for severe mitral valve pathologies. In redo cases, especially after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery with patent mammary bypass grafts, establishing aortic clamping followed by antegrade cardioplegia application might be challenging. Here, we present the outcome of hypothermic ventricular fibrillation as an alternative to conventional cardioprotection. Methods: Patients who underwent MIMVS either received hypothermic ventricular fibrillation (study group, n = 48) or antegrade cardioprotection (control group, n = 840) and were observed for 30 postoperative days. Data were retrospectively analyzed and collected from January 2011 until December 2022. Results: Patients in the study group had a higher preoperative prevalence of renal insufficiency (p = 0.001), extracardiac arteriopathy (p = 0.001), insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (p = 0.001) and chronic lung disease (p = 0.036). Furthermore, they had a longer surgery time and a lower repair rate (p < 0.001). No difference, however, was seen in postoperative incidences of stroke (p = 0.26), myocardial infarction (p = 1) and mitral valve re-operation (p = 1) as well as 30-day mortality (p = 0.1) and postoperative mitral valve insufficiency or stenosis. Conclusions: The patients who underwent redo MIMVS with hypothermic ventricular fibrillation did not have worse outcomes or more serious adverse events compared to the patients who received routine conventional cardioprotection. Therefore, the use of hypothermic ventricular fibrillation appears to be a promising cardioprotective technique in this challenging patient population requiring redo MIMVS.

Mitral valve replacement in young patients: review and current challenges.

Mitral valve repair is the ideal intervention for mitral valve disease with excellent long-term survival comparable to the age-matched general population. When the mitral valve is not repairable, mechanical prostheses may be associated with improved survival as compared with biological prostheses. Newer mechanical and biological valve prostheses have the potential to improve outcomes following mitral valve replacement in young patients. Patients presenting for mitral valve surgery after failed transcatheter mitral valve-in-valve have high rates of postoperative mortality and morbidity, exceeding those seen with reoperative mitral valve surgery, which poses issues in young patients who have a higher cumulative incidence of reintervention.

Mechanical mitral valve endurance in children under 2 years

BackgroundThe management of mitral valve disease in young children is challenging. Mechanical mitral valves could provide long-term durability; however, the need for anticoagulation increases the risk profile of mechanical valves. We report our experience in mechanical mitral valve replacement (MVR) in children under 2 years of age and evaluate factors affecting the outcomes.The study included all patients younger than 2 years who underwent mechanical MVR between 2000 and 2023. The study outcomes were mitral valve reoperation, bleeding, valve-related thrombosis, and survival.ResultsTwenty-three patients were included, with a mean age of 10.2 ± 5.9 months. The mitral valve sizes ranged from 16 to 25 mm, and 6 (26%) were placed in the supra-annular position. Complete heart block occurred in seven patients (30%), and operative mortality occurred in three patients (13%). Postoperative warfarin was used in 17 patients (74%). After discharge, bleeding occurred in five patients (22%), four were managed conservatively, and one had intracranial hemorrhage treated with craniotomy. Nine patients (39%) had valve-related thrombosis; two underwent reoperation, while seven were treated with alteplase in 26 patients. Valve-related thrombosis was more common in patients with supra-annular valves (p < 0.001) and in those who were not on warfarin (p < 0.001). A total of seven patients (30%) underwent redo MVR, and redo was more common in young patients (p = 0.029) and in patients with supra-annular valves (p < 0.001). Survival of the whole cohort was 73% at 5 years. Among the annular position group, 5-year survival was 88%, while among the supra-annular position group, survival was 50% after 3 months and 25% after 14 months (p = 0.009).ConclusionsMechanical MVR in children younger than 2 years is associated with high complication rates, including thrombosis and bleeding. The supra-annular valve position appears to be a risk factor for thrombosis and reoperation. Anticoagulation with warfarin remains challenging. However, further studies evaluating alternative options are needed.Graphical

Comparison of Mitral Valve Repair Versus Percutaneous Mitral Balloon Commissurotomy for Patients With Rheumatic Heart Disease: A Single-Centre Study

Percutaneous mitral balloon commissurotomy (PMBC) is the standard treatment option for patients with rheumatic mitral stenosis (MS), according to current guidelines. This study aimed to compare the outcomes of rheumatic mitral valve repair (rMVR) and PMBC in this patient population. Baseline, clinical, and follow-up data from 703 patients with rheumatic heart disease who underwent PMBC or rMVR at the current centre were collected and analysed. A 1:1 propensity score (PS) matching method was used to balance the differences in baseline characteristics between the two groups. The primary outcome was mitral valve reoperation, and the secondary outcome was all-cause mortality. Propensity score matching generated 101 patient pairs for comparison. In the matched population, there were no significant differences in the early clinical outcomes between the groups. The median follow-up time was 40.9 months. Overall, patients in the rMVR group had a statistically significantly lower risk of mitral valve reoperation than those in the PMBC group (HR 0.186; 95% CI 0.041-0.835; p=0.028). Regarding all-cause mortality, no statistically significant differences were observed between the rMVR and PMBC groups (HR 4.065; 95% CI 0.454-36.374; p=0.210). Compared with PMBC, rMVR has more advantages for the correction of valve lesions; therefore, it may offer a better prognosis than PMBC in select patients with rheumatic MS. However, this finding needs to be verified in future studies with larger sample sizes and longer follow-up periods.

Mitral valve repair with leaflet resection versus preservation for degenerative posterior leaflet prolapse

ObjectivesThe optimal technique for repairing posterior mitral valve leaflet prolapse remains undetermined. We aimed to compare leaflet resection and neochordae implantation in patients undergoing mitral valve repair for posterior leaflet prolapse, focusing on transmitral pressure gradient and recurrence of mitral regurgitation. MethodsWe enrolled patients undergoing mitral valve repair using either leaflet resection or neochordae implantation for single-segment prolapse of posterior mitral valve leaflet between 2000 and 2021 at our institution. Longitudinal outcomes were evaluated after adjustments with inverse-probability-of-treatment weighting. Repeat echocardiographic measurements (n = 3473, 5.4/patient) of transmitral pressure gradient and significant (moderate or severe) mitral regurgitation recurrence were estimated using nonlinear mixed-effect models. Subgroup analyses were conducted based on the size and type of prosthesis. ResultsAmong 639 patients, leaflet resection was used in 479 (75.0%) and neochordae implantation was used in 160 (25.0%). In the inverse-probability-of-treatment weighting adjusted cohort, the risk of death (P = .623) and mitral valve reoperation (P = .340) did not significantly differ between the 2 groups during a median follow-up of 97.3 months. Echocardiographic data showed comparable mean (at 5 years, 3.8 vs 4.0 mm Hg; P = .442) and peak (9.6 vs 10.4 mm Hg; P = .131) pressure gradients between groups, which persisted in most subgroup analyses. However, neochordae implantation was associated with a higher probability of significant mitral regurgitation recurrence compared with leaflet resection (at 5 years, 16.1% vs 7.0%; P < .001). ConclusionsLeaflet resection yielded similar clinical outcomes and transmitral pressure gradients compared with neochordae implantation after mitral valve repair, with a lower mitral regurgitation recurrence rate. These findings underscore the need to reassess the efficacy of neochordae implantation relative to leaflet resection.

Intraoperative conduction system mapping during reoperative mitral valve replacement

Intraoperative conduction system mapping during reoperative mitral valve replacement

The Fate of Mitral Valve Surgery in the Pediatric Age: A 25-Year Single-Center Experience.

Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate the natural history of patients after mitral valve intervention in the pediatric age. Methods: This is a retrospective study including all patients who underwent mitral valve surgery from 1998 to 2022. The patients' surgical reports, postoperative records, and ambulatory visits were reviewed. The endpoints of the study were survival and freedom from mitral valve reoperation. Results: Of the 70 patients included in the cohort, 61 patients (86.7%) had congenital mitral valve disease, of whom 46 patients (75.4%) had a predominantly mitral regurgitation lesion, and 15 patients (24.6%) had a predominantly mitral stenosis. In the mitral regurgitation group, all of the patients underwent valve repair with an operative mortality of one patient (2.1%), and with median follow-up of 4 years (range, 0.5-13 years), there was 4.3% mortality (n = 2) and 71.2% freedom from reoperation. In the mitral stenosis group, 11 patients underwent mitral valve repair, and 4 patients underwent valve replacement. There was an operative mortality of two patients (13.3%). With a 2-year median follow-up (range: 0.1-23 years), there were no additional mortality cases in the mitral stenosis group. All three patients who survived primary mitral valve replacement (100%) and four patients who survived a primary repair (40.0%) underwent reoperation. Conclusions: This study demonstrates encouraging outcomes for mitral valve repair. The mortality of patients with congenital mitral valve disease may also be related to a difficult postoperative course, rather than the MV lesion itself.

Rerepair for Mitral Insufficiency

BackgroundMitral valve repair provides superior outcomes to replacement for primary mitral regurgitation. Whether this is true after previous repair is unknown. This study presents the results of a strategy of rerepair for failed mitral valve repair. The study examined patients who were brought to the operating room for an intended mitral valve rerepair. MethodsStudy investigators reviewed the last decade of institutional mitral valve databases at The University of Pennsylvania (Philadelphia, PA) and Baylor Scott & White The Heart Hospital - Plano (Plano, TX) and identified patients who underwent repeat mitral valve repair, in whom the index operation was mitral valve repair. The study analyzed their operative details and the clinical and echocardiographic outcomes. ResultsBetween 2008 and 2021, 71 patients (aged 61.5 ±10.7 years; 20% female) underwent mitral valve reoperation at an mean of 6.24 ± 7.62 years after an index mitral repair. A total of 20% of patients presented with New York Heart Association functional class III or IV symptoms. At the index operation, 34 patients (47.9%) had repair through a right minithoracotomy. Fifteen patients (21.1%) required the reoperation within 1 year. There were 0 early and 8 late deaths. One patient who underwent mitral replacement instead of repair required reoperation for paravalvular leak during the follow-up period. Three patients required mitral valve replacement at an average of 2.28 ± 2.03 years after initial mitral valve rerepair. ConclusionsMitral rerepair can be performed with acceptable results at a valve reference center. Durability and functional advantages of this approach remain to be proven.

Mitral valve surgery in patients with Marfan syndrome

ObjectiveTo review the pathology of the mitral valve (MV) and long-term outcomes of surgery in patients with Marfan syndrome (MFS). Patients and MethodsFrom 1988 through 2020, 60 patients with MFS had surgery to correct mitral regurgitation (MR): 19 had isolated MV surgery, 32 had combined MV and aortic root surgery, and 9 had MV surgery after aortic root surgery. Follow-up was complete for a median of 16.1 years. ResultsMV pathology was myxomatous degeneration in all patients and of advanced degree in 78.6% with bileaflet prolapse in 65.5%, mitral annulus disjunction in 57.5%, and mitral annulus calcification in 8.2% of patients. The MV was repaired in 47 patients and replaced in 13. Kaplan–Meier estimates of cumulative mortality at 20 years 21.3% for all patients, 6.7% after MV repair, and 57.8% after replacement (P < .001). MV reoperations were performed in 5 patients: 2 after repair and 3 after replacement. The cumulative incidence rate of reoperations on the MV was 3.8% at 10 years and 11.0% at 20 years in the entire cohort. Among 47 patients who had MV repair, moderate MR developed in 11 patients and severe in 2. Both patients with severe MR underwent MV reoperation. The cumulative incidence rate of recurrent moderate or severe MR after MV repair was 20.4% at 10 years, and 36.5% at 20 years. ConclusionsMV repair was associated with better survival than MV replacement, but recurrent MR after repair occurred in approximately one-third of the patients at 20 years after surgery.

Mitral Valve Repair vs. Replacement by Different Etiologies - A Nationwide Population-Based Cohort Study.

When mitral valve (MV) surgery is indicated, repair is preferred over replacement; however, this preference is not supported by evidence from clinical trials. Furthermore, the benefits of MV repair may not be universal for all etiologies of MV disease.Methods and Results: This study identified a total of 18,428 patients who underwent MV repair (n=4,817) or MV replacement (n=13,611) during 2001-2018 from Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database. These patients were classified into 4 etiologies: infective endocarditis (IE, n=2,678), rheumatic heart disease (RHD, n=4,524), ischemic mitral regurgitation (IMR, n=3,893), and degenerative mitral regurgitation (DMR, n=7,333). After propensity matching, all-cause mortality during follow-up was lower among patients receiving MV repair than among patients receiving MV replacement in the IE, IMR, and DMR groups (hazard ratio [HR]=0.72, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.55-0.93; HR=0.82, 95% CI: 0.73-0.92; and HR 0.73, 95% CI: 0.64-0.84, respectively). However, in the RHD group, the MV reoperation rate was higher after MV repair than after MV replacement (subdistribution HR=1.91, 95% CI: 1.02-3.55). In comparison with MV replacement, MV repair was associated with a lower late mortality in patients with IE, IMR, and DMR, and a higher risk of reoperation in patients with RHD.

Early and long-term outcomes following redo mitral valve surgery in patients with prior minimally invasive mitral valve surgery.

The frequency of minimally invasive mitral valve surgery (MVS) has steadily increased over the last decades and therefore surgeons are now encountering an increasing number of patients requiring mitral valve (MV) reoperations post-minimally invasive MVS. The aim of this study was to analyse the early postoperative outcomes and the long-term survival in patients who undergo reoperative MVS following previous minimally invasive surgery. Patients who underwent redo MVS following prior minimally invasive MVS between January 2002 and December 2021 were included in our analysis. Study data were prospectively collected and retrospectively analysed. The primary outcomes were 30-day mortality and long-term survival. Among the 187 included patients, 34 (18.2%) underwent repeat MV repair and 153 (81.8%) MV replacement. The median age was 66 years (interquartile range 56-74) and 80 (42.8%) patients were female. Redo MVS was performed through median sternotomy in 169 patients (90.4%). A total of 77 (41.2%) patients had additional concomitant procedures. The median intensive care unit stay was 1 day (1-5). The 30-day mortality was 6.4% (12/187). Estimated survival at 5 and 12 years was 61.8% and 38.3%, respectively. Preoperative stroke (hazard ratio 3.28, 95% confidence interval 1.37-7.85, P = 0.007) as well as infective endocarditis (hazard ratio 1.85; 95% confidence interval 1.09-3.11, P = 0.021) were independent predictors of long-term mortality. Redo MVS following prior minimally invasive MVS can be performed safely with low early perioperative mortality and acceptable long-term survival. Preoperative stroke, infective endocarditis and concomitant tricuspid valve surgery are independent predictors of long-term mortality.

Edge-to-edge with partial band mitral valve repair compared to replacement and undersized restrictive annuloplasty for ischemic mitral regurgitation

ObjectiveEvidence supports replacement over repair for ischemic mitral regurgitation due to improved durability; however, the latter often involves an undersized ring annuloplasty that does not include edge-to-edge approximation. The objective of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of replacement, edge-to-edge leaflet approximation with mild-undersized annuloplasty and undersized ring annuloplasty for ischemic mitral regurgitation. MethodsThis is a single-center retrospective study of patients undergoing mitral surgery for moderate-severe or greater ischemic mitral regurgitation, between 2004 and 2020, with mild-undersized annuloplasty, mitral valve replacement, or undersized restrictive annuloplasty (undersized ring annuloplasty). The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes included first recurrence of mitral regurgitation, heart failure hospitalization, and composite of valve-related events (bleeding, thromboembolism, endocarditis, and mitral valve reoperation). ResultsThere were 121, 93, and 78 patients in the mitral valve replacement, mild-undersized annuloplasty, and undersized restrictive annuloplasty groups, respectively, with a median follow-up of 3.1, 5.9, and 3.8 years, respectively. Both mitral valve replacement (hazard ratio, 1.87; 95% CI, 1.029-3.415) and undersized restrictive annuloplasty (hazard ratio, 2.73; 95% CI, 1.480-5.061) were associated with worse survival compared with mild-undersized annuloplasty. At 2 years, the rate of mild-moderate mitral regurgitation was greater in the mild-undersized annuloplasty group compared with the mitral valve replacement group (P = .001) but less than in the undersized restrictive annuloplasty group (P = .001). The rate of recurrent moderate or greater mitral regurgitation at 2 years was similar between mild-undersized annuloplasty and mitral valve replacement groups but significantly higher after undersized restrictive annuloplasty (P < .0001). Mitral valve replacement and undersized restrictive annuloplasty were associated with a significant increase in the incidence of first heart failure hospitalization compared with mild-undersized annuloplasty (P < .001 and P = .001, respectively). Mitral valve replacement was associated with an increased incidence of valve-related events compared with mild-undersized annuloplasty (P = .002). ConclusionsSurgical edge-to-edge approximation in addition to a mild-undersizing annuloplasty offers similar durability compared with replacement, with a lower rate of hospitalization for heart failure, and may confer a survival advantage.

Late Survival After Redo Mitral Operation With Minithoracotomy Compared With Sternotomy

BackgroundThe long-term effectiveness of minithoracotomy over redo median sternotomy for reoperative mitral operation is not well described. Here we present long-term survival after reoperative mitral operation based on operative approach. MethodsAdults undergoing mitral valve operation with previous sternotomy by redo sternotomy and minithoracotomy were reviewed from our prospectively maintained institutional database from 1997 to 2022. Propensity score matching was performed to compare short- and long-term outcomes. ResultsOf 750 consecutive patients, thoracotomy was performed in 503 (67%). Median follow-up was 5.0 years (interquartile range, 0-23 years). Intraoperatively, sternotomy patients were more likely to have central aortic cannulation (205 of 223 [93%] vs 265 of 481 [56%]), cardioplegic arrest (220 of 223 [99%] vs 124 of 481 [26%]), and mitral valve replacement (190 of 223 [85%] vs 358 of 481 [74%]). Thoracotomy patients were older (63 ± 13 vs 58 ± 14 years) with elective presentation (387 of 503 [77%] vs 128 of 247 [52%]). Sternotomy patients were more likely to have endocarditis (52 of 247 [21%] vs 45 of 503 [9%], P < .001). At 10 years, thoracotomy patients experienced improved survival (52% ± 3% vs 46% ± 4%, P = .004). After propensity matching, 10-year survival was significantly higher for thoracotomy patients compared with sternotomy patients (60% ± 5% vs 42% ± 5%, P = .0006). The greatest difference in survival was at the first 6 months after operation (96% ± 1% vs 81% ± 3%, P < .001). ConclusionsFor patients undergoing reoperative mitral valve operation, minimally invasive right anterior thoracotomy can significantly decrease risk of death in the first 6 months, with durable survival benefit out to 10 years. We present a large single-center series to suggest an important opportunity to durably improve outcomes after reoperative mitral operation through wider use of right minithoracotomy.

Reoperation after failure of mitral valve repair for degenerative disease: A single surgeon experience

BackgroundWith an increasing number of patients undergoing mitral valve repair, more patients are presenting for reoperation. This study aimed to evaluate factors influencing mortality and survival of patients undergoing reoperation for mitral valve surgery after previous mitral valve repair under a single surgeon. MethodsWe retrospectively collected data from 117 patients who underwent reoperation after previous mitral valve repair between 2010 and 2022. We aimed to identify preoperative, operative, and postoperative factors affecting outcomes. The primary outcome was overall survival, and the secondary outcomes included prolonged hospital stay and in-hospital mortality. The mean follow-up was 9.13 ± 10.36 years (median, 6.50 years). ResultsOut of 117 patients, 85 underwent mitral valve replacement (MVR) and 32 underwent mitral valve repair (MVr). The mean age was 64.7 ± 12.7 years (65.5 ± 12.2 years in the MVR group and 62.7 ± 14.0 years in the MVr group), and 66 (56.4%) were men. On a standard multivariate analysis of the overall factors influencing mortality, advanced age was associated with a higher risk of overall mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 1.07; 95% confidence interval [CI], f1.03-1.12; P = .001). The urgency of surgical intervention also played a role, with a higher risk of in-hospital mortality in patients undergoing emergency reoperation (HR, 1.55; 95% CI, 1.60-149.05; P = .02). Furthermore, the presence of mixed lesions, encompassing both mitral regurgitation and stenosis, was strongly linked to increased overall mortality (HR, 17.09; 95% CI, 4.06-71.94; P < .001) and in-hospital mortality (HR, 1.75; 95% CI, 15.83-1925.61; P < .001). Infective endocarditis emerged as a prominent risk factor for overall mortality (HR, 992.08; 95% CI, 85.74-11,479.08; P < .001) and in-hospital mortality (HR, 5.83; 95% CI, 514.81-65,932.99; P < .001). Additionally, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease was associated with a significantly increased risk of overall mortality (HR, 4.3; 95% CI, 1.24-14.97; P = .02) ConclusionsOur single surgeon experience demonstrates that mitral valve reoperation after a previous repair is associated with good outcomes and survival.