Robotic-assisted mitral valve repair surgery has a steep learning curve, and it is not clear whether previous experience in minimally-invasive mitral valve surgery (MIMVS) facilitates this process. We aimed to investigate the initial experience of two cardiac centers starting their robotic programs, evaluating the impact of previous MIMVS experience. Retrospective analysis was performed for the first consecutive cases operated due to severe degenerative mitral valve regurgitation using the robotic surgical platform in two European centers, one transitioning from conventional surgery (Center1) and the other from mini-thoracotomy (MT) MIMVS (Center2). Cumulative sum analysis was used to evaluate the learning process using both surgical times and a combined primary outcome including relevant intra- and postoperative results. First 62 patients in each center were included. All median surgical times were shorter in Center 2: cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB): 238vs.115min,p<0.001; cross-clamp: 143vs.82min,p<0.001; and total intervention: 313vs.228min,p<0.001. The combined primary outcome showed no significant differences (9.7%vs.8%;p=1). However, the turning point making the end of the learning phase was detected at the 60th case in Center 1 and at the 50th in Center 2. Regarding surgical time, the learning curve was steeper in Center 1 with both CPB and cross-clamp overcoming the learning phase after 32 cases, as compared to 16 cases in Center 2. A successful robotic-assisted mitral repair program can be safely started coming from either conventional open approach or MT-MIMVS. However, previous MT-MIMVS experience had positive impact on the initial learning curve.
Read full abstract