Missing Acknowledgement Research Articles

Berichtigung: Catalytic Oxidation of CO on a Curved Pt(111) Surface: Simultaneous Ignition at All Facets through a Transient CO‐O Complex

In this Research Article on page 20214, the correct energies for XPS peaks corresponding to Terrace-Top (TT) and Terrace-Bridge (TB) are 286.6 eV and 285.9 eV, respectively. In the Acknowledgments section, the authors would also like to thank MAX-lab/MAX IV for technical support during beam times to perform XPS experiments in UHV. The authors sincerely apologize for these errors and the missing acknowledgment.

Correction to Moore et al. (2020).

Reports an error in "Criterion validity and relationships between alternative hierarchical dimensional models of general and specific psychopathology" by Tyler M. Moore, Antonia N. Kaczkurkin, E. Leighton Durham, Hee Jung Jeong, Malerie G. McDowell, Randolph M. Dupont, Brooks Applegate, Jennifer L. Tackett, Carlos Cardenas-Iniguez, Omid Kardan, Gaby N. Akcelik, Andrew J. Stier, Monica D. Rosenberg, Donald Hedeker, Marc G. Berman and Benjamin B. Lahey (Journal of Abnormal Psychology, Advanced Online Publication, Jul 16, 2020, np). In the article (http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/abn0000601), an acknowledgment is missing from the author note. The missing acknowledgement is included in the erratum. (The following abstract of the original article appeared in record 2020-50590-001.) Psychopathology can be viewed as a hierarchy of correlated dimensions. Many studies have supported this conceptualization, but they have used alternative statistical models with differing interpretations. In bifactor models, every symptom loads on both the general factor and 1 specific factor (e.g., internalizing), which partitions the total explained variance in each symptom between these orthogonal factors. In second-order models, symptoms load on one of several correlated lower-order factors. These lower-order factors load on a second-order general factor, which is defined by the variance shared by the lower-order factors. Thus, the factors in second-order models are not orthogonal. Choosing between these valid statistical models depends on the hypothesis being tested. Because bifactor models define orthogonal phenotypes with distinct sources of variance, they are optimal for studies of shared and unique associations of the dimensions of psychopathology with external variables putatively relevant to etiology and mechanisms. Concerns have been raised, however, about the reliability of the orthogonal specific factors in bifactor models. We evaluated this concern using parent symptom ratings of 9-10 year olds in the ABCD Study. Psychometric indices indicated that all factors in both bifactor and second-order models exhibited at least adequate construct reliability and estimated replicability. The factors defined in bifactor and second-order models were highly to moderately correlated across models, but have different interpretations. All factors in both models demonstrated significant associations with external criterion variables of theoretical and clinical importance, but the interpretation of such associations in second-order models was ambiguous due to shared variance among factors. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

Criterion validity and relationships between alternative hierarchical dimensional models of general and specific psychopathology.

[Correction Notice: An Erratum for this article was reported in Vol 129(7) of Journal of Abnormal Psychology (see record 2020-72912-001). In the article (http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/abn0000601), an acknowledgment is missing from the author note. The missing acknowledgement is included in the erratum.] Psychopathology can be viewed as a hierarchy of correlated dimensions. Many studies have supported this conceptualization, but they have used alternative statistical models with differing interpretations. In bifactor models, every symptom loads on both the general factor and 1 specific factor (e.g., internalizing), which partitions the total explained variance in each symptom between these orthogonal factors. In second-order models, symptoms load on one of several correlated lower-order factors. These lower-order factors load on a second-order general factor, which is defined by the variance shared by the lower-order factors. Thus, the factors in second-order models are not orthogonal. Choosing between these valid statistical models depends on the hypothesis being tested. Because bifactor models define orthogonal phenotypes with distinct sources of variance, they are optimal for studies of shared and unique associations of the dimensions of psychopathology with external variables putatively relevant to etiology and mechanisms. Concerns have been raised, however, about the reliability of the orthogonal specific factors in bifactor models. We evaluated this concern using parent symptom ratings of 9-10 year olds in the ABCD Study. Psychometric indices indicated that all factors in both bifactor and second-order models exhibited at least adequate construct reliability and estimated replicability. The factors defined in bifactor and second-order models were highly to moderately correlated across models, but have different interpretations. All factors in both models demonstrated significant associations with external criterion variables of theoretical and clinical importance, but the interpretation of such associations in second-order models was ambiguous due to shared variance among factors. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

Correction to: A prospective randomized trial comparing corifollitropin-α late-start (day 4) versus standard administration (day 2) in expected poor, normal, and high responders undergoing controlled ovarian stimulation for IVF

The original article unfortunately has a missing acknowledgement.

Correction to “Announcing the Journal of the Medical Library Association’s data sharing policy” on 107(4) July, pages 470 and 471. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2019.801

[This corrects the article on p. 468 in vol. 107, PMID: 31607804.].

Correction to: In Silico Structure-Based Identification and Validation of Key Residues of Vip3Aa Involving in Lepidopteran Brush Border Receptor Binding.

The original version of this article unfortunately contained a mistake. The missing acknowledgement is provided below.

Corrigendum

In the paper ‘Capital Inflows and House Prices: Aggregate and Regional Evidence from China’ by H. An, et al., printed in the December 2016 issue, there was a missing acknowledgement section for funding resources. On page 451, the acknowledgement section should appear after the corresponding information as: “Correspondence: Rakesh Gupta, Department of Accounting, Finance and Economics, Griffith Business School, Griffith University, Nathan Campus QLD 4111. r.gupta@griffith.edu.au *This work was financially supported by the Humanities and Social Science Foundation of Ministry of Education of China (16YJA790001).” The author apologises for this error and any confusion it may have caused.

Correction to: Mental models of food security in rural Mali

The original version of this article unfortunately contained an error. The acknowledgement section is inadvertently omitted. The missing acknowledgement is given below.

Erratum to: Classical and Early Modern Sources of the Poetry of Jan Cruso of Norwich (1592-fl. 1655)

A correction to the article Classical and Early Modern Sources of the Poetry of Jan Cruso of Norwich that was published in the 2014 issue is presented which mentions a missing acknowledgement.

Plasmonically enhanced hot electron based photovoltaic device: erratum

This erratum amends the missing acknowledgment section in our manuscript. ©2013 Optical Society of America OCIS codes: (040.5350) Photovoltaic; (240.6680) Surface plasmons. References and links 1. F. B. Atar, E. Battal, L. E. Aygun, B. Daglar, M. Bayindir, and A. K. Okyay, “Plasmonically enhanced hot electron based photovoltaic device,” Opt. Express 21(6), 7196–7201 (2013). The acknowledgment text was missing in our published paper [1]. This work was supported in part by European Union Framework Program 7 Marie Curie IRG under Grant 239444, COST NanoTP, The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey-TUBITAK under Grants 109E044, 112M004, and 112E052. #197771 $15.00 USD Received 20 Sep 2013; published 24 Sep 2013 (C) 2013 OSA 7 October 2013 | Vol. 21, No. 20 | DOI:10.1364/OE.21.023324 | OPTICS EXPRESS 23324

Erratum to “Sterile Endophthalmitis after Intravitreal Injections”

In the original paper there is a missing Acknowledgment section, and it should include the following phrase: this paper has been partially funded by Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Project EC08/00192.