Marker Of Mismatch Repair Research Articles

Abstract 5150: An immunohistochemical survey of predictive biomarkers for immunotherapy in ampullary carcinoma identifies strata with unique prognostic signatures

Abstract Introduction: Carcinomas located in the ampulla of Vater are a low incidence malignancy. Therapeutic options for early stage disease largely consist of pancreaticoduodenectomy followed by adjuvant chemotherapy with or without radiation. We explored the localization of CD8 and CD3 positive cells in addition to PDL-1 staining and mismatch repair deficiency markers to gain insight into the potential applicability of immunotherapy for patients with this disease. Methods: Excess material from clinically diagnosed cases collected between 1997 - 2013 were used to construct a duplicate 0.6mm core tissue microarray (TMA). All cases were derived from the Vancouver Coastal Health Region. Immunohistochemical staining was performed with the following markers: CD8, CD3, PD-L1, and the mismatch repair (MMR) markers: MSH2, MSH6, MLH1 and PMS2. CD3 and CD8 were quantified using localization within the tissue. PD-L1 was considered positive with >1% of cells stating positive. MMR markers were confirmed using full section and cases with convincing loss of any MMR marker were considered MMR deficient. Univariable disease specific survival analysis was performed to identify unique prognostic signatures and contingency analysis was performed to identify co-expression of the aforementioned biomarkers. Results: Ninety-eight cases were evaluable for all markers. The median age of the cohort was 69 [41 - 84] years. Forty-two percent were female. Adjuvant chemotherapy was provided to 15% of patients with the remainder undergoing post-surgical observation. Almost 90% were pT3 or pT4 and 48% had regional lymph node metastasis. CD3+ T-cells were either localized in the tumor stroma only (59%) or in both the stroma and epithelial compartments (41%). CD8+ T-cells were principally located in the stroma (66%) and both the epithelial and stroma (24%). Ten percent of cases had no CD8+ T-cells. PD-L1 staining was found in 10% of cases. MMR deficiency was found in 5% of cases. Improved prognostic signatures were found for cases with CD3+ and CD8+ T-cells in both the epithelial and stromal compartments (p <= 0.02). A trend towards a negative prognostic signature was observed for MMR deficient cases and for PD-L1 positive cases. The only significant positive association between biomarkers was found for CD3+ and CD8+ in both the epithelial and stromal compartments. Conclusions: The results of this analysis suggest that enhancement of an immune response yielding an increase CD3+ and CD8+ T-cells in the epithelial compartment may have a beneficial effect on prognosis. The relative scarcity of MMR deficiency in this disease is within the expected prevalence supported by other studies. Further exploration of the potential role of immunotherapy in immune enhanced subgroups of ampullary cancers is warranted. Citation Format: Steve E. Kalloger, Joanna Karasinska, James Topham, Daniel J. Renouf, David F. Schaeffer. An immunohistochemical survey of predictive biomarkers for immunotherapy in ampullary carcinoma identifies strata with unique prognostic signatures [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(6_Suppl):Abstract nr 5150.

Mismatch repair markers in preoperative and operative endometrial cancer samples; expression concordance and prognostic value

BackgroundThe endometrial cancer mismatch repair (MMR) deficient subgroup is defined by loss of MSH6, MSH2, PMS2 or MLH1. We compare MMR status in paired preoperative and operative samples and investigate the prognostic impact of differential MMR protein expression levels.MethodsTumour lesions from 1058 endometrial cancer patients were immunohistochemically stained for MSH6, MSH2, PMS2 and MLH1. MMR protein expression was evaluated as loss or intact to determine MMR status, or by staining index to evaluate the prognostic potential of differential expression. Gene expression data from a local (n = 235) and the TCGA (n = 524) endometrial cancer cohorts was used for validation.ResultsWe identified a substantial agreement in MMR status between paired curettage and hysterectomy samples. Individual high expression of all four MMR markers associated with non-endometrioid subtype, and high MSH6 or MSH2 strongly associated with several aggressive disease characteristics including high tumour grade and FIGO stage, and for MSH6, with lymph node metastasis. In multivariate Cox analysis, MSH6 remained an independent prognostic marker, also within the endometrioid low-grade subgroup (P < 0.001).ConclusionWe demonstrate that in addition to determine MMR status, MMR protein expression levels, particularly MSH6, may add prognostic information in endometrial cancer.

Microsatellite Instability Assessment by Immunohistochemistry in Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Reappraisal and Review of the Literature

Microsatellite instability (MSI) is caused by defects in DNA mismatch repair (MMR) components. Inactivation of any MMR gene(s), including hMLH1, hMSH2, hMSH6, and hPMS2, can result in MSI. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) is a sensitive and specific screening tool for MSI that can detect loss of expression of one or more MMR components. Of the four MMR markers, hMLH1 and hMSH2 are considered most informative of MSI status. There has been renewed interest in MSI status in view of its favorable association with response to immune checkpoint inhibitors in some cancers. MMR expression patterns in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) have not been evaluated systematically. We used clinically-validated IHC assays to assess the expression of hMLH1, hMSH2, hMSH6, and/or hPMS2 in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue sections of bone marrow core biopsies from patients diagnosed with AML. Mutation profiling was performed using next-generation sequencing to assess for mutations in MMR genes. The study group included 236 patients with AML, including a cohort treated on a clinical trial of azacitidine and nivolumab (NCT02397720). In addition, hMSH6, and/or hPMS2 expression was assessed in 99 AML patients with diploid karyotype. All patients, except two, had retained expression of all MMR markers assessed: One patient from the azacytidine+nivolumab group had zonal patchy loss of staining of hMLH1 and, to a lesser extent, a similar staining pattern of hMSH2; and one patient from the AML with diploid karyotype group had loss of hMSH2 but retained expression of hMLH1, hMSH6 and hPMS2. In addition, a retrospective analysis on a separate cohort of 139 patients with primary AML, on which next generation sequencing profiling was performed, identified 14 cases with alterations in MMR genes. MMR loss is a rare event in AML, thus does not appear to underlie response patterns to anti-PD1 therapy.

BRAF V600E and Mismatch Repair Proteins Expression in Sporadic Young-onset Colorectal Cancer in Kelantan, Malaysia.

ObjectivesWe sought to determine the immunohistochemistry expression of mismatch repair (MMR) and BRAF V600E proteins in sporadic young-onset colorectal cancer (CRC) and their association with clinicopathological features in the Kelantan population.MethodsThis was a cross-sectional study of sporadic young-onset CRC over 11 years from 1 January 2006 to 31 December 2017 in Kelantan. Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue blocks were immunohistochemically stained with antibodies for MMR (MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2) and BRAF V600E. These expressions were correlated with clinicopathological parameters.ResultsOur patient sample included 31 patients with a mean age of 31.5 years. More than half (61.3%) of the patients were women. The majority presented with abdominal pain (41.9%), and 71.0% had a tumor located on the right side of the colon, with 83.9% being moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma. The majority of patients presented at stage IV (54.8%). The most frequent pattern was all MMR protein expressions, which constituted patients in the microsatellite stable group (64.5%). Nine (29.0%) were microsatellite instability (MSI-high), and two (6.5%) were MSI-low. Positive BRAF V600E expression was observed in 83.9% of patients. Only histopathological subtypes revealed a significant association with BRAF V600E positive expression (p = 0.015).ConclusionsThe majority of sporadic young-onset CRC presented with abdominal pain and advanced cancer stage. Most were microsatellite stable, and most cases showed positive expressions in all MMR markers and BRAF V600E by immunohistochemistry method. This finding will pave the way for further research on this disease.

A correlation study of mismatch repair immunohistochemical protein expression of pancreatic solid tumors in cytology cell blocks and matching surgical specimens.

Only 15%-20% of newly diagnosed pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) cases are surgically operable. Cytology samples may be the only source for guiding clinical management. Current research indicates that mismatch repair (MMR) status could be valuable for implementing novel treatment modalities. In this study, immunohistochemical (IHC) MMR protein expression on cytology cell blocks was compared with that of the correlating surgical resection specimens. A retrospective review of 120 pancreatic solid tumor needle biopsies from 2016 to 2019 was performed, and 15 experimental cases were selected comprising of cellular (>100 tumor cells and >100 benign positive control cells that include benign ductal cells and/or lymphocytes) alcohol-prefixed formalin-fixed cytology cell blocks (CB), and corresponding subsequent surgical resections (Surg). The cases include 13 PDACs (87%), 1 (6.5%) low grade neuroendocrine tumor (PNET), and 1 (6.5%) acinar cell carcinoma (ACC). A routine four-panel (MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2) MMR IHC testing was performed. The percentage of protein expression was evaluated and compared between individual CB-Surg pairs. About 8 of the 15 (53.3%) cytology cases showed matching protein expressivity with the surgical specimens for all four MMR markers (Table 1). The remaining 7 pairs (46.7%) appeared to have a partial concordance, including 6 values for which a surgical marker showed less expression, and 13 values for which a cytological marker showed less expression. [Table: see text] CONCLUSION: Cytology CB MMR protein panel testing could be a useful consideration for inoperable patients who would benefit from medical therapy such as immune checkpoint inhibition. However, the cellularity and overall quality of the CB is expected to be paramount in obtaining satisfactory IHC MMR results. The MMR results could be more confidently trusted when the staining is intact, but when not retained, they should be interpreted with caution in a low cellularity sample to avoid mistakenly identifying MMR-deficient tumors.

Mutational burden on circulating cell-free tumor-DNA testing as a surrogate marker of mismatch repair deficiency/microsatellite instability and/or response to immunotherapy in patients with colorectal cancer.

e15066 Background: Circulating cell-free tumor-DNA (ctDNA) testing (‘liquid biopsy’) is increasingly being employed both in clinical trials as well as clinical practice. We aimed to contrast and compare the differences in the number of somatic mutations observed on ctDNA testing between mismatch repair deficient/microsatellite instability-high (dMMR/MSI-High) versus mismatch repair proficient/microsatellite stable (pMMR/MSS) colorectal cancers (CRC). Methods: We had 20 patients at Mayo Clinic Florida that were dMMR/MSI-High with testing through the commercially available platform (Guardant360) that uses a 73-gene panel. Median numbers of somatic mutations were compared between the 2 subset of CRC. Results: Patients with dMMR/MSI-High CRC had a median of 8 mutations (range: 2-15) versus a median of 4 mutations (range: 1-22) in pMMR/MSS patients, p-value of 0.001. Similarly, the mean number of somatic mutations were 7.47 (S.D. ± 4.15) versus 5.02 mutations (S.D. ± 3.83) in patients with dMMR/MSI-H and pMMR/MSS, tumors respectively. Though it is simplistic, we could still potentially identify patients who may be candidates for immunotherapy by gauging the mutational burden reported (Table). Furthermore, on serial testing, decline in mutational burden as early as few weeks into therapy was predictive of response later on imaging. Conclusions: Analysis of number of somatic mutations on ctDNA testing can be complementary to MMR/MSI-testing, especially in situations when tissue is not available or safe to obtain. This can also be of value in predicting and/or following response to immunotherapy. The utility of this may go beyond CRC in identifying patients who may benefit from immunotherapy. [Table: see text]

Genetic, Epigenetic, and Immunologic Profiling of MMR-Deficient Relapsed Glioblastoma.

In-depth characterization of recurrent glioblastoma (rGBM) might contribute to a better understanding of the mechanisms behind tumor progression and enable rGBM treatment with targeted drugs.Experimental Design: In this study, GBM samples were collected at diagnosis and recurrence from adult patients treated with Stupp protocol. Expression of mismatch repair (MMR) proteins was evaluated by IHC, followed by whole exome sequencing (WES) of tumor samples showing loss of MSH6 reactivity. Established genetic, epigenetic, and immunologic markers were assessed by standard methods and correlated with loss of MMR proteins and patient survival. Expression of MMR proteins was partially or completely lost in 25.9% rGBM samples. Specifically, 12 samples showed partial or total MSH6 expression reduction. Conversely, 96.4% of GBM samples at diagnosis expressed MMR markers. WES disclosed lack of variants in MMR genes in primary samples, whereas two MSH6-negative rGBM samples shared a c.3438+1G>A* splicing MSH6 variant with a potential loss of function effect. MSH6-negative rGBM specimens had high tumor mutational burden (TMB), but no microsatellite instability. In contrast, GBM samples with partial loss of MMR proteins disclosed low TMB. MMR-deficient rGBM showed significant telomere shortening and MGMT methylation and are characterized by highly heterogeneous MHC class I expression. Multilevel profiling of MMR-deficient rGBM uncovered hypermutated genotype uncoupled from enriched expression of immune-related markers. Assessment of MHC class I expression and TMB should be included in protocols aiming to identify rGBM patients potentially eligible for treatment with drugs targeting immune-checkpoint inhibitors.

A Correlation Study of Mismatch Repair (MMR) Immunohistochemical Protein Expression of Pancreatic Solid Tumors in Cytology Cell Blocks and Matching Surgical Specimens

Introduction Only 15%-20% of newly diagnosed pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) cases are surgically operable. Cytology samples may be the only source for guiding clinical management. Current research indicates that mismatch repair (MMR) status could be valuable for implementing novel treatment modalities. In this study, immunohistochemical (IHC) MMR protein expression on cytology cell blocks was compared with that of the correlating surgical resection specimens. Materials and methods A retrospective review of 120 pancreatic solid tumor needle biopsies from 2016 to 2019 was performed, and 15 experimental cases were selected comprising of cellular (>100 tumor cells and >100 benign positive control cells that include benign ductal cells and/or lymphocytes) alcohol-prefixed formalin-fixed cytology cell blocks (CB), and corresponding subsequent surgical resections (Surg). The cases include 13 PDACs (87%), 1 (6.5%) low grade neuroendocrine tumor (PNET), and 1 (6.5%) acinar cell carcinoma (ACC). A routine four-panel (MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2) MMR IHC testing was performed. The percentage of protein expression was evaluated and compared between individual CB-Surg pairs. Results About 8 of the 15 (53.3%) cytology cases showed matching protein expressivity with the surgical specimens for all four MMR markers (Table 1). The remaining 7 pairs (46.7%) appeared to have a partial concordance, including 6 values for which a surgical marker showed less expression, and 13 values for which a cytological marker showed less expression. [Table: see text] CONCLUSION: Cytology CB MMR protein panel testing could be a useful consideration for inoperable patients who would benefit from medical therapy such as immune checkpoint inhibition. However, the cellularity and overall quality of the CB is expected to be paramount in obtaining satisfactory IHC MMR results. The MMR results could be more confidently trusted when the staining is intact, but when not retained, they should be interpreted with caution in a low cellularity sample to avoid mistakenly identifying MMR-deficient tumors.

PO-338 Recurrent glioblastoma: a complex scenario dominated by loss of MMR proteins

IntroductionGlioblastoma (GBM) is the most common primary brain tumour in adults and the Stupp protocol represents the standard of care. However, the tumour invariably relapses suggesting marked intra-tumour genetic heterogeneity enabling rapid adaptation to therapy. In-depth characterisation of recurrent GBM (rGBM) might contribute to better understand mechanisms behind tumour progression and enable rGBM treatment with targeted drugs.Material and methodsMatched GBM samples have been collected at diagnosis and recurrence from adult patients (n=57) treated with the Stupp protocol. Expression of mismatch repair (MMR) proteins (MLH1, PMS2, MSH2, MSH6) was evaluated by IHC, followed by exome sequencing of 3 pairs showing loss of MSH6 reactivity as well as of 3 MSH6 positive pairs. In addition, established genetic and epigenetic markers of GBM were investigated along with their correlation with loss of MMR proteins and patients’ survival.Results and discussionsAccording to IHC results, 13 out of 52 rGBM samples (25%) lacked expression of MMR proteins. In particular, 11 among the 13 samples (85%) showed partial or total reduction of MSH6 expression. Conversely, almost all GBM samples at diagnosis (96.4%) stained positive for the 4 MMR markers. Consistent with IHC data, exome sequencing disclosed lack of variants in MMR genes in primary samples whereas rGBM samples lacking MSH6 expression were mutated in the abovementioned genes and shared a c.3438+1G>A* splicing variant in MSH6 with a potential loss of function effect. Moreover, MSH6 negative relapsed specimens were characterised by 30 to 100-fold more variants compared to the matched primary ones and lacked microsatellite instability. Notably, MMR deficiency was associated with significant telomere shortening. Conversely, the tumour pairs expressing MMR proteins showed an almost comparable number of mutations in primary versus relapsed samples and absence of variants in MMR genes both in the initial tumours and in their recurrent counterpart.ConclusionOur study shows that IHC staining is a valuable tool to identify a subset of rGBM patients with alterations in MMR genes linked to high mutational burden and, hence, potentially eligible for drugs targeting immune checkpoint inhibitors.

THE STUDY OF MISMATCH REPAIR IN ENDOMETRIAL CANCER PATIENTS WITH A FAMILY HISTORY OF CANCER

To assess the expression of mismatch repair (MMR) proteins MSH2 and MLH1 and carry out microsatellite analysis in patients with endometrial cancer (EC) with regard to the family history of cancer. Morphological and immunohistochemical study was performed on tumor tissue samples of 49 EC patients. Microsatellite instability was determined using PCR with primers which flank microsatellite region BAT-26. A tendency to a decreased expression of both MSH2 and MLH1 markers in a group of EC patients with a family history of cancer as compared with a group without aggregation of cancer in family history was observed (labeling index - LI - was 36.1 ± 8.1% and LI 20.7 ± 9.1% versus LI 48.0 ± 5.8% and 33.8 ± 5.8%, respectively). It was determined that the number of EC patients with tumors deficient by expression of MMR markers was reliably higher in a group of patients with a family history of cancer than in a group of patients without aggregation of cancer in family history (р < 0.05). It was shown that in a group of EC patients with a family history of cancer, MMR-proficient tumors were detected in 38.5% of cases. Microsatellite instability was determined in 10.7% of EC patients including one patient with aggregation of Lynch-associated tumors in family history. Family history of cancer of EC patients is associated with malfunctioning of the MMR system as well as may be related to alternative molecular mechanisms.

Abstract 4198: Mismatch repair polymorphisms and breast cancer risk in the Metropolitan New York Breast Cancer Family Registry

Abstract Suboptimal DNA repair capacity is believed to contribute to genomic instability and, thereby, onset of carcinogenesis. In fact, deficient repair has been reported to account for up to a five-fold increase in breast cancer risk. Major cancer susceptibility genes involved in repair, including BRCA1 and BRCA2 among breast cancer cases, have been identified. However, mutations in these genes are thought to account for only 5-10% of familial cases. Additional genetic susceptibility factors may play a role in the remaining cases, including polymorphisms in DNA repair pathway genes. Microsatellite instability, a commonly observed marker of mismatch repair (MMR) defects, has been observed in skin samples from breast cancer patients, suggesting a putative role for MMR in breast cancer. In this study, we investigated polymorphisms in mismatch repair genes and their association with breast cancer risk among participants of the Metropolitan New York Registry of Breast Cancer Families (N=744). Of the 313 sister-sets included in the registry, 306 sister-sets consisted of sisters discordant for disease. A total of twelve SNPs were chosen and assayed using Taqman SNP genotyping kits from Applied Biosystems. Using conditional logistic regression, an association with breast cancer was observed for two of the twelve SNPs assayed. A significant association with breast cancer risk was observed for MutY (H335Q,C/G) while a borderline association was observed for MSH2 (IVS12-6, T/C): OR = 2.24 (1.11-4.52) and OR = 1.71 (0.99-2.95), respectively. Future studies will focus on replicating these findings in a larger study population. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 102nd Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2011 Apr 2-6; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2011;71(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 4198. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2011-4198

Methylnitrosourea as challenge mutagen in assessment of the DNA mismatch repair (MMR) activity: Association with some types of cancer

Total repair capability is a widely used phenotypic marker of predisposition to cancer. Evaluation of this parameter implies using a challenge mutagen in an in vitro system to unmask latent genetic instability and repair insufficiency in the target cells. Traditionally, these investigations involve two tests, evaluation of mutagenic susceptibility (chromosomal aberrations) and genotoxic effect (DNA comet assay). The present study was focused on analysis of the effect of methylnitrosourea (MNU) on resting and PHA-stimulated lymphocytes from healthy donors and patients with gynecological cancer. Cytotoxic effect of MNU (apoptotic lymphocyte death) was estimated using two parameters, interaction of the cells with the annexin V-FITC complex, and morphological changes of the nuclei after their staining with the mixture of two DNA tropic dyes. The genotoxic effect of MNU, namely, secondary double-strand DNA breaks, was scored using the neutral comet assay, modified for the calculation of the comets produced exclusively by BrUdr-labeled proliferating lymphocytes. The proportion of these comets was represented as the proliferative cell index. It was shown that resting lymphocytes were resistant to genotoxic and cytotoxic effects of MNU. The response of proliferating cells to the action of MNU was expressed as the development of secondary DNA breaks (P <0.01), along with the increased frequency of apoptosis (P <0.05). The genotoxic effect of MNU on stimulated lymphocytes of gynecological cancer patients was fourfold lower compared to healthy donor lymphocytes. In response to the MNU action, patient lymphocytes did not change their proliferative index, while in healthy donor lymphocytes proliferative index was two times decreased in response to the MNU action. The data obtained pointed to the association between the cytotoxic response of the lymphocytes to the action of MNU and gynecological cancer. Since only proliferating lymphocytes response to the genotoxic effect of MNU, and the effect is revealed a day after the mutagen action, it is suggested that this phenomenon is associated with postreplicative repair, MMR, the substrate of which is O6-methylguanin. The MMR deficiency in patient lymphocytes determines their tolerance to the action of MNU. Genotoxic effect of lymphocytes to the action of MNU can serve as a marker of MMR, as well as of the MMR deficiency-associated gynecological cancer.