REVIEWS 749 Siegel,Jennifer.Endgame. Britain, Russia andtheFinalStruggle for Central Asia. I. B. Tauris,LondonandNew York,2002. xviii + 273pp. Map.Notes. Bibliography. Index.?29.50. ALTHOUGH counter-factual, what-ifhistoryis currently verymuchin vogue, historians arestillexperiencing difficulty dispelling theauraofinevitability of conflictwhichsuffuses thevastmajority of secondary accountsof theperiod immediately precedingtheFirstWorldWar.Receivedwisdomstillinsists,for example,thatthe diplomaticprecipitation of the TripleEntenteof Britain, FranceandRussiabothunalterably determined themembership of therival campsoftheproactive TripleAllianceandreactiveTripleEntente,andmade theirmilitaryclashultimately unavoidable. A particular cognateassumption hassooftenbeenthatBritain andRussiamayhavetakenaninterminable time to resolvetheirnineteenth-century antagonisms andcementthe lastcrucial linkinthetriangular relationship oftheTripleEntentebuttheAnglo-Russian Conventionof I907 wasincontestably a triumphof strategicstatesmanship whichirreversibly contracted thefuturealliesoftheFirstWorld War. JenniferSiegel'sacademically meticulous studythrowssuchpresumptions aboutAnglo-Russian relationsintogravestdoubt.The globalimportance of what amounted to the longest front (or at least friction zone) in the pre-I9I4 world, stretchingfromthe Ottoman Empirein the westto the Chinese Empire to the east, is confidentlyand convincingly assertedin the face of a traditional Eurocentric historiography which has implicitly marginalized central Asia into an imperial sideshow. Each year-defined chapter examines AngloRussian relations over the three areas of Persia, Afghanistan and Tibet (typicallyin that orderand on thatrelativescaleof coverage)with an emphasis on a deterioration which was almost certainly teetering on the brink of total breakdownby mid-I914. Had the assassinationof ArchdukeFranzFerdinand occurred later than June 19I4 in Europe, the Triple Entente may well have already collapsed in Asia. Without Sarajevo, it is not beyond the bounds of possibility that Britain and Russia, far from still being firm allies, may have been at war over centralAsia by late 19 I4. Perhaps the only quarrel which might be picked with this intriguing and authoritative study is with its new (and presumably unironic) main title. In attempting to burnish the publication appeal of her Yale doctoral thesis (entitled 'Peaceful Penetration under Arms: Anglo-Russian Relations in Central Asia, 1907-I914'), Siegel may have chosen a misleading metaphor. Many British certainly feared that proven Russian expertise at chess might result in their being outplayed in the 'Great Game' in the East, the ultimate penalty being the loss of India, the 'Jewelin the Crown' of the BritishEmpire. But the term 'endgame' stronglysuggeststhe finalgoing-through-the-motions formalityphase in a match where the outcome has alreadybeen decided. This is assuredlynot the conclusion drawnby Siegel aboutAnglo-Russianrelations. On the contrary,there was no certaintyof outcome and indeed, both players still had everything to play for when European war intervened in 19 I4. Not only was the 'Endgame'to the traditional'GreatGame' not being played over 1907- I4, it is arguablethat the 'Final Struggle'is stillto be played out across Iraq, Iran,Afghanistanand Tibet almost a centurylater. 750 SEER, 8i, 4, 2003 But there can be no quibbling about the scholarly qualities and historiographical impact of this impressivemonograph. The comprehensive coverage of hitherto-unavailable,punctiliouslypresented primarysourcesfrom the state archivesof St Petersburgand Moscow, which fullydocuments the tsarist side of the Anglo-Russian relationship for the first time, would alone be enough to raise this study to the first order of importance in diplomatic history. Conscientiously integrated with official British documentation, the Russia material mined during Siegel's resourceful 'window of archival opportunity' reveals the I907 Convention not as a golden turning-point transformingpreviously-hostile Anglo-Russian relations but as a temporary tactical stand-off dictated by the near-revolutionarydomestic trauma which accompanied Russia'shumiliatingmilitarydebacle at the handsofJapan over I904-05. With Russia'songoing physical recovery and revivingpolitical selfconfidence , the Convention of I907 with the 'wearytitan' of the increasingly oil-obsessed BritishEmpire was preservedonly by theirjoint fear of German interference and eventually the fortuitouslytimely intervention of European war. As an investigation into the remorseless friction between two proudly expansionist but over-extended and therefore vulnerable Great Powers, Endgamemakes a magisterial and original contribution towards our reunderstandingof the worldwhich was to disappearwith the FirstWorldWar. Department ofHistogy RAYMOND PEARSON University ofUlster at Coleraine McReynolds, Louise. RussiaatPlay:Leisure Activities attheEndoftheTsarist Era. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY, and London, 2003. x + 309 pp. Illustrations.Notes. Bibliographicalessay.Index. $36.50; /22.95. PLAY is a seriousbusiness,especiallyforhistorians.In herwell-researchedand stimulatingstudy, Louise McReynolds brings firmlyto our attention the late tsarist leisure industry and shows how it can deepen our understanding of Russian culture and society. The book's eight chapters cover five main areas of activity: theatre (both 'legitimate' and 'commercialized...