Mis12 Complex Research Articles

CENP-C-Mis12 complex establishes a regulatory loop through Aurora B for chromosome segregation.

Establishing the correct kinetochore-microtubule attachment is crucial for faithful chromosome segregation. The kinetochore has various regulatory mechanisms for establishing correct bipolar attachment. However, how the regulations are coupled is not fully understood. Here, we demonstrate a regulatory loop between the kinetochore protein CENP-C and Aurora B kinase, which is critical for the error correction of kinetochore-microtubule attachment. This regulatory loop is mediated through the binding of CENP-C to the outer kinetochore Mis12 complex (Mis12C). Although the Mis12C-binding region of CENP-C is dispensable for mouse development and proliferation in human RPE-1 cells, those cells lacking this region display increased mitotic defects. The CENP-C-Mis12C interaction facilitates the centromeric recruitment of Aurora B and the mitotic error correction in human cells. Given that Aurora B reinforces the CENP-C-Mis12C interaction, our findings reveal a positive regulatory loop between Aurora B recruitment and the CENP-C-Mis12C interaction, which ensures chromosome biorientation for accurate chromosome segregation.

Artificial kinetochore beads establish a biorientation-like state in the spindle

Faithful chromosome segregation requires biorientation, where the pair of kinetochores on the chromosome establish bipolar microtubule attachment. The integrity of the kinetochore, a macromolecular complex built on centromeric DNA, is required for biorientation, but components sufficient for biorientation remain unknown. Here, we show that tethering the outer kinetochore heterodimer NDC80-NUF2 to the surface of apolar microbeads establishes their biorientation-like state in mouse cells. NDC80-NUF2 microbeads align at the spindle equator and self-correct alignment errors. The alignment is associated with stable bipolar microtubule attachment and is independent of the outer kinetochore proteins SPC24-SPC25, KNL1, the Mis12 complex, inner kinetochore proteins, and Aurora. Larger microbeads align more rapidly, suggesting a size-dependent biorientation mechanism. This study demonstrates a biohybrid kinetochore design for synthetic biorientation of microscale particles in cells.

A conserved germline-specific Dsn1 alternative splice isoform supports oocyte and embryo development

The chromosome segregation and cell division programs associated with somatic mitosis and germline meiosis display dramatic differences such as kinetochore orientation, cohesin removal, or the presence of a gap phase.1,2,3,4,5,6 These changes in chromosome segregation require alterations to the established cell division machinery.5,6 It remains unclear what aspects of kinetochore function and its regulatory control differ between the mitotic and meiotic cell divisions to rewire these core processes. Alternative RNA splicing can generate distinct protein isoforms to allow for the differential control of cell processes across cell types. However, alternative splice isoforms that differentially modulate distinct cell division programs have remained elusive. Here, we demonstrate that mammalian germ cells express an alternative mRNA splice isoform for the kinetochore component, DSN1, a subunit of the MIS12 complex that links the centromeres to spindle microtubules during chromosome segregation. This germline DSN1 isoform bypasses the requirement for Aurora kinase phosphorylation for its centromere localization due to the absence of a key regulatory region allowing DSN1 to display persistent centromere localization. Expression of the germline DSN1 isoform in somatic cells results in constitutive kinetochore localization, chromosome segregation errors, and growth defects, providing an explanation for its tight cell-type-specific expression. Reciprocally, precisely eliminating expression of the germline-specific DSN1 splice isoform in mouse models disrupts oocyte maturation and early embryonic divisions coupled with a reduction in fertility. Together, this work identifies a germline-specific splice isoform for a chromosome segregation component and implicates its role in mammalian fertility.

Structural basis for Mis18 complex assembly and its implications for centromere maintenance

The centromere, defined by the enrichment of CENP-A (a Histone H3 variant) containing nucleosomes, is a specialised chromosomal locus that acts as a microtubule attachment site. To preserve centromere identity, CENP-A levels must be maintained through active CENP-A loading during the cell cycle. A central player mediating this process is the Mis18 complex (Mis18α, Mis18β and Mis18BP1), which recruits the CENP-A-specific chaperone HJURP to centromeres for CENP-A deposition. Here, using a multi-pronged approach, we characterise the structure of the Mis18 complex and show that multiple hetero- and homo-oligomeric interfaces facilitate the hetero-octameric Mis18 complex assembly composed of 4 Mis18α, 2 Mis18β and 2 Mis18BP1. Evaluation of structure-guided/separation-of-function mutants reveals structural determinants essential for cell cycle controlled Mis18 complex assembly and centromere maintenance. Our results provide new mechanistic insights on centromere maintenance, highlighting that while Mis18α can associate with centromeres and deposit CENP-A independently of Mis18β, the latter is indispensable for the optimal level of CENP-A loading required for preserving the centromere identity.

Artificial tethering of constitutive centromere-associated network proteins induces CENP-A deposition without Knl2 in DT40 cells.

The kinetochore is an essential structure for chromosome segregation. Although the kinetochore is usually formed on a centromere locus, it can be artificially formed at a non-centromere locus by protein tethering. An artificial kinetochore can be formed by tethering of CENP-C or CENP-I, members of the constitutive centromere-associated network (CCAN). However, how CENP-C or CENP-I recruit the centromere-specific histone CENP-A to form an artificial kinetochore remains unclear. In this study, we analyzed this issue using the tethering assay combined with an auxin-inducible degron (AID)-based knockout method in chicken DT40 cells. We found that tethering of CENP-C or CENP-I induced CENP-A incorporation at the non-centromeric locus in the absence of Knl2 (or MIS18BP1), a component of the Mis18 complex, and that Knl2 tethering recruited CENP-A in the absence of CENP-C. We also showed that CENP-C coimmunoprecipitated with HJURP, independently of Knl2. Considering these results, we propose that CENP-C recruits CENP-A by HJURP binding to form an artificial kinetochore. Our results suggest that CENP-C or CENP-I exert CENP-A recruitment activity, independently of Knl2, for artificial kinetochore formation in chicken DT40 cells. This gives us a new insight into mechanisms for CENP-A incorporation.

Direct recruitment of Mis18 to interphase spindle pole bodies promotes CENP-A chromatin assembly

CENP-A chromatin specifies mammalian centromere identity, and its chaperone HJURP replenishes CENP-A when recruited by the Mis18 complex (Mis18C) via M18BP1/KNL2 to CENP-C at kinetochores during interphase. However, the Mis18C recruitment mechanism remains unresolved in species lacking M18BP1, such as fission yeast. Fission yeast centromeres cluster at G2 spindle pole bodies (SPBs) when CENP-ACnp1 is replenished and where Mis18C also localizes. We show that SPBs play an unexpected role in concentrating Mis18C near centromeres through the recruitment of Mis18 by direct binding to the major SPB linker of nucleoskeleton and cytoskeleton (LINC) component Sad1. Mis18C recruitment by Sad1 is important for CENP-ACnp1 chromatin establishment and acts in parallel with a CENP-C-mediated Mis18C recruitment pathway to maintain centromeric CENP-ACnp1 but operates independently of Sad1-mediated centromere clustering. SPBs therefore provide a non-chromosomal scaffold for both Mis18C recruitment and centromere clustering during G2. This centromere-independent Mis18-SPB recruitment provides a mechanism that governs de novo CENP-ACnp1 chromatin assembly by the proximity of appropriate sequences to SPBs and highlights how nuclear spatial organization influences centromere identity.

Repression of CENP-A assembly in metaphase requires HJURP phosphorylation and inhibition by M18BP1.

Centromeres are the foundation for mitotic kinetochore assembly and thus are essential for chromosome segregation. Centromeres are epigenetically defined by nucleosomes containing the histone H3 variant CENP-A. CENP-A nucleosome assembly is uncoupled from replication and occurs in G1, but how cells control this timing is incompletely understood. The formation of CENP-A nucleosomes in vertebrates requires CENP-C and the Mis18 complex which recruit the CENP-A chaperone HJURP to centromeres. Using a cell-free system for centromere assembly in X. laevis egg extracts, we discover two activities that inhibit CENP-A assembly in metaphase. HJURP phosphorylation prevents the interaction between HJURP and CENP-C in metaphase, blocking the delivery of soluble CENP-A to centromeres. Non-phosphorylatable mutants of HJURP constitutively bind CENP-C in metaphase but are not sufficient for new CENP-A assembly. We find that the M18BP1.S subunit of the Mis18 complex also binds to CENP-C to competitively inhibit HJURP's access to centromeres. Removal of these two inhibitory activities causes CENP-A assembly in metaphase.

The cryo‐EM structure of the CENP‐A nucleosome in complex with ggKNL2

Centromere protein A (CENP‐A) nucleosomes containing the centromere‐specific histone H3 variant CENP‐A represent an epigenetic mark that specifies centromere position. The Mis18 complex is a licensing factor for new CENP‐A deposition via the CENP‐A chaperone, Holliday junction recognition protein (HJURP), on the centromere chromatin. Chicken KINETOCHORE NULL2 (KNL2) (ggKNL2), a Mis18 complex component, has a CENP‐C‐like motif, and our previous study suggested that ggKNL2 directly binds to the CENP‐A nucleosome to recruit HJURP/CENP‐A to the centromere. However, the molecular basis for CENP‐A nucleosome recognition by ggKNL2 has remained unclear. Here, we present the cryo‐EM structure of the chicken CENP‐A nucleosome in complex with a ggKNL2 fragment containing the CENP‐C‐like motif. Chicken KNL2 distinguishes between CENP‐A and histone H3 in the nucleosome using the CENP‐C‐like motif and its downstream region. Both the C‐terminal tail and the RG‐loop of CENP‐A are simultaneously recognized as CENP‐A characteristics. The CENP‐A nucleosome–ggKNL2 interaction is thus essential for KNL2 functions. Furthermore, our structural, biochemical, and cell biology data indicate that ggKNL2 changes its binding partner at the centromere during chicken cell cycle progression.

Mobility of kinetochore proteins measured by FRAP analysis in living cells

The kinetochore is essential for faithful chromosome segregation during mitosis and is assembled through dynamic processes involving numerous kinetochore proteins. Various experimental strategies have been used to understand kinetochore assembly processes. Fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) analysis is also a useful strategy for revealing the dynamics of kinetochore assembly. In this study, we introduced fluorescence protein-tagged kinetochore protein cDNAs into each endogenous locus and performed FRAP analyses in chicken DT40 cells. Centromeric protein (CENP)-C was highly mobile in interphase, but immobile during mitosis. CENP-C mutants lacking the CENP-A-binding domain became mobile during mitosis. In contrast to CENP-C, CENP-T and CENP-H were immobile during both interphase and mitosis. The mobility of Dsn1, which is a component of the Mis12 complex and directly binds to CENP-C, depended on CENP-C mobility during mitosis. Thus, our FRAP assays provide dynamic aspects of how the kinetochore is assembled.

The kinetochore protein NNF1 has a moonlighting role in the vegetative development of Arabidopsis thaliana

The kinetochore is a supramolecular protein complex assembled on the chromosomes, essential for faithful segregation of the genome during cell divisions. More than 100 proteins are known to constitute the eukaryotic kinetochore architecture, primarily identified using non-plant organisms. A majority of them are fast evolving and are under positive selection. Thus, functional characterization of the plant kinetochore proteins is limited as only a few conserved orthologs sharing sequence similarity with their animal counterparts have been examined. Here, we report the functional characterization of the Arabidopsis thaliana homolog of the yeast NNF1/human PMF1 outer kinetochore protein and show that it has both kinetochore and non-kinetochore functions in plant growth and development. Knockout of NNF1 causes embryo lethality implying its essential role in cell division. AtNNF1 interacts with MIS12 in Y2H and co-immunoprecipitation assays, confirming it is one of the constituents of the plant MIS12 complex. GFP-NNF1 localizes to the kinetochore, rescuing the embryo lethal nnf1-1-/- phenotype, but the rescued plants (GFP-NNF1nnf1-/- ) are dwarf, displaying hypomorphic phenotypes with no evidence of mitotic or meiotic segregation defects. GFP-NNF1nnf1-/- dwarf plants have reduced levels of endogenous polyamines, which are partially rescued to wild-type levels upon exogenous application of polyamines. Mutations in the putative leucine zipper-like binding motif of NNF1 gave rise to a dominant-negative tall plant phenotype reminiscent of constitutive gibberellic acid (GA) action. These contrasting hypomorphic dwarf and antimorphic tall phenotypes facilitated us to attribute a moonlighting role to Arabidopsis NNF1 affecting polyamine and GA metabolism apart from its primary role in kinetochores.

Impact of KMN network genes on progression and prognosis of non-small cell lung cancer.

The Knl1-Mis12-Ndc80 (KMN) network genes (including KNL, MIS12 and NDC80 complexes) encode a highly conserved network of protein complexes that act in cell mitosis. In recent years, multiple studies revealed that KMN network genes also play a vital role in tumor appearance and growth. However, the role of the KMN gene network in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains unknown. In this study, we analyzed the effects of KMN genes expression and clinical phenotype in patients with lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD). The expression of KMN network genes and related clinical information was extracted from The Cancer Genome Atlas. The samples were classified into cluster I and II by consistent clustering. We analyzed the gene distribution by principal component analysis, and the potential risk characteristics were analyzed using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator Cox regression algorithm. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were used to analyze the clinical information. The Database for Annotation, Visualization, and Integrated Discovery, Gene MANIA and gene set enrichment analysis were used to analyze function and correlation among genes of the KMN network. The expression levels of nine out of ten KMN genes were significantly up-regulated in LUAD and were associated with poor overall survival (OS). Higher expression of NDC80 and KNL1 was related to low OS in both univariate and multivariate analyses. According to two independent prognostic KMN network genes (KNL1 and NDC80), a risk signature was established to predict the prognosis of patients with LUAD. Additionally, the genes NDC80 and KNL1 were considerably enriched in pathways associated with signaling pathways, biological processes, and the cell cycle. The results indicate that KMN network genes are intimately related to lung adenocarcinoma. KMN network genes are involved in the malignant process of LUAD. Assessment of NDC80 and KNL1 might be helpful for prognostic stratification and treatment strategy development.

Centromere targeting of Mis18 requires the interaction with DNA and H2A-H2B in fission yeast.

Faithful chromosome segregation during mitosis requires the correct assembly of kinetochore on the centromere. CENP-A is a variant of histone H3, which specializes the centromere region on chromatin and mediates the kinetochore assembly. The Mis18 complex plays a critical role in initiating the centromere loading of the newly-synthesized CENP-A. However, it remains unclear how Mis18 complex (spMis18, spMis16 and spMis19) is located to the centromere to license the recruitment of Cnp1CENP-A in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. We found that spMis18 directly binds to nucleosomal DNA through its extreme C-terminus and interacts with H2A-H2B dimer via the acidic region on the surface of its Yippee-like domain. Live-cell imaging confirmed that mutation of the acidic region and deletion of the extreme C-terminus significantly impairs the localization of spMis18 and Cnp1 to the centromere and delays chromosome segregation during mitosis. Our findings illustrate that the interaction of spMis18 with histone H2A-H2B and DNA plays important roles in the recruitment of spMis18 and Cnp1 to the centromere in fission yeast.

Structural basis for centromere maintenance by Drosophila CENP‐A chaperone CAL1

Centromeres are microtubule attachment sites on chromosomes defined by the enrichment of histone variant CENP‐A‐containing nucleosomes. To preserve centromere identity, CENP‐A must be escorted to centromeres by a CENP‐A‐specific chaperone for deposition. Despite this essential requirement, many eukaryotes differ in the composition of players involved in centromere maintenance, highlighting the plasticity of this process. In humans, CENP‐A recognition and centromere targeting are achieved by HJURP and the Mis18 complex, respectively. Using X‐ray crystallography, we here show how Drosophila CAL1, an evolutionarily distinct CENP‐A histone chaperone, binds both CENP‐A and the centromere receptor CENP‐C without the requirement for the Mis18 complex. While an N‐terminal CAL1 fragment wraps around CENP‐A/H4 through multiple physical contacts, a C‐terminal CAL1 fragment directly binds a CENP‐C cupin domain dimer. Although divergent at the primary structure level, CAL1 thus binds CENP‐A/H4 using evolutionarily conserved and adaptive structural principles. The CAL1 binding site on CENP‐C is strategically positioned near the cupin dimerisation interface, restricting binding to just one CAL1 molecule per CENP‐C dimer. Overall, by demonstrating how CAL1 binds CENP‐A/H4 and CENP‐C, we provide key insights into the minimalistic principles underlying centromere maintenance.

CenH3-Independent Kinetochore Assembly in Lepidoptera Requires CCAN, Including CENP-T.

Accurate chromosome segregation requires assembly of the multiprotein kinetochore complex at centromeres. In most eukaryotes, kinetochore assembly is primed by the histone H3 variant CenH3 (also called CENP-A), which physically interacts with components of the inner kinetochore constitutive centromere-associated network (CCAN). Unexpectedly, regarding its critical function, previous work identified that select eukaryotic lineages, including several insects, have lost CenH3 while having retained homologs of the CCAN. These findings imply alternative CCAN assembly pathways in these organisms that function in CenH3-independent manners. Here we study the composition and assembly of CenH3-deficient kinetochores of Lepidoptera (butterflies and moths). We show that lepidopteran kinetochores consist of previously identified CCAN homologs as well as additional components, including a divergent CENP-T homolog, that are required for accurate mitotic progression. Our study focuses on CENP-T, which we found to be sufficient to recruit the Mis12 and Ndc80 outer kinetochore complexes. In addition, CRISPR-mediated gene editing in Bombyx mori establishes an essential function of CENP-T invivo. Finally, the retention of CENP-T and additional CCAN homologs in other independently derived CenH3-deficient insects indicates a conserved mechanism of kinetochore assembly between these lineages. Our study provides the first functional insights into CCAN-based kinetochore assembly pathways that function independently of CenH3, contributing to the emerging picture of an unexpected plasticity to build a kinetochore.

Antigen-driven selection of antibodies against SSA, SSB and the centromere ‘complex’, including a novel antigen, MIS12 complex, in human salivary glands

ObjectivesRecent evidences have revealed that anti-SSA/SSB antibodies, the major autoantibodies in Sjögren's syndrome (SS), are produced in salivary glands. This study aims to clarify overall of autoantibody production at lesion...

Enrichment of Aurora B kinase at the inner kinetochore controls outer kinetochore assembly.

Outer kinetochore assembly enables chromosome attachment to microtubules and spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC) signaling in mitosis. Aurora B kinase controls kinetochore assembly by phosphorylating the Mis12 complex (Mis12C) subunit Dsn1. Current models propose Dsn1 phosphorylation relieves autoinhibition, allowing Mis12C binding to inner kinetochore component CENP-C. Using Xenopus laevis egg extracts and biochemical reconstitution, we found that autoinhibition of the Mis12C by Dsn1 impedes its phosphorylation by Aurora B. Our data indicate that the INCENP central region increases Dsn1 phosphorylation by enriching Aurora B at inner kinetochores, close to CENP-C. Furthermore, centromere-bound CENP-C does not exchange in mitosis, and CENP-C binding to the Mis12C dramatically increases Dsn1 phosphorylation by Aurora B. We propose that the coincidence of Aurora B and CENP-C at inner kinetochores ensures the fidelity of kinetochore assembly. We also found that the central region is required for the SAC beyond its role in kinetochore assembly, suggesting that kinetochore enrichment of Aurora B promotes the phosphorylation of other kinetochore substrates.

CDK phosphorylation of Xenopus laevis M18BP1 promotes its metaphase centromere localization.

Chromosome segregation requires the centromere, the site on chromosomes where kinetochores assemble in mitosis to attach chromosomes to the mitotic spindle. Centromere identity is defined epigenetically by the presence of nucleosomes containing the histone H3 variant CENP-A. New CENP-A nucleosome assembly occurs at the centromere every cell cycle during G1, but how CENP-A nucleosome assembly is spatially and temporally restricted remains poorly understood. Centromere recruitment of factors required for CENP-A assembly is mediated in part by the three-protein Mis18 complex (Mis18α, Mis18β, M18BP1). Here, we show that Xenopus M18BP1 localizes to centromeres during metaphase-prior to CENP-A assembly-by binding to CENP-C using a highly conserved SANTA domain. We find that Cdk phosphorylation of M18BP1 is necessary for M18BP1 to bind CENP-C and localize to centromeres in metaphase. Surprisingly, mutations which disrupt the metaphase M18BP1/CENP-C interaction cause defective nuclear localization of M18BP1 in interphase, resulting in defective CENP-A nucleosome assembly. We propose that M18BP1 may identify centromeric sites in metaphase for subsequent CENP-A nucleosome assembly in interphase.

Multiple phosphorylations control recruitment of the KMN network onto kinetochores.

To establish a functional kinetochore, the constitutive centromere-associated network (CCAN) forms a foundation on the centromere and recruits the KMN network, which directly binds to spindle microtubules. The CENP-C and CENP-T pathways in the CCAN recruit the KMN network to kinetochores, independently. The CENP-C pathway has been considered the major scaffold for the KMN network in vertebrate CCAN. However, we demonstrate that it is mainly the CENP-T pathway that recruits the KMN network onto the kinetochores and that CENP-T-KMN interactions are essential in chicken DT40 cells. By contrast, less Ndc80 binds to the CENP-C pathway in mitosis and the Mis12-CENP-C association is decreased during mitotic progression, which is consistent with the finding that the Mis12 complex-CENP-C binding is dispensable for cell viability. Furthermore, we find that multiple phosphoregulations of CENP-T and the Mis12 complex make the CENP-T pathway dominant. These results provide key insights into kinetochore dynamics during mitotic progression.

An assay for de novo kinetochore assembly reveals a key role for the CENP-T pathway in budding yeast.

Chromosome segregation depends on the kinetochore, the machine that establishes force-bearing attachments between DNA and spindle microtubules. Kinetochores are formed every cell cycle via a highly regulated process that requires coordinated assembly of multiple subcomplexes on specialized chromatin. To elucidate the underlying mechanisms, we developed an assay to assemble kinetochores de novo using centromeric DNA and budding yeast extracts. Assembly is enhanced by mitotic phosphorylation of the Dsn1 kinetochore protein and generates kinetochores capable of binding microtubules. We used this assay to investigate why kinetochores recruit the microtubule-binding Ndc80 complex via two receptors: the Mis12 complex and CENP-T. Although the CENP-T pathway is non-essential in yeast, we demonstrate that it becomes essential for viability and Ndc80c recruitment when the Mis12 pathway is crippled by defects in Dsn1 phosphorylation. Assembling kinetochores de novo in yeast extracts provides a powerful and genetically tractable method to elucidate critical regulatory events in the future.

Mis16 Switches Function from a Histone H4 Chaperone to a CENP-ACnp1-Specific Assembly Factor through Eic1 Interaction

The Mis18 complex, composed of Mis16, Eic1, and Mis18 in fission yeast, selectively deposits the centromere-specific histone H3 variant, CENP-ACnp1, at centromeres. How the intact Mis18 holo-complex oligomerizes and how Mis16, a well-known ubiquitous histone H4 chaperone, plays a centromere-specific role in the Mis18 holo-complex, remain unclear. Here, we report the stoichiometry of the intact Mis18 holo-complex as (Mis16)2:(Eic1)2:(Mis18)4 using analytical ultracentrifugation. We further determine the crystal structure of Schizosaccharomyces pombe Mis16 in complex with the C-terminal portion of Eic1 (Eic1-CT). Notably, Mis16 accommodates Eic1-CT through the binding pocket normally occupied by histone H4, indicating that Eic1 and H4 compete for the same binding site, providing a mechanism for Mis16 to switch its binding partner from histone H4 to Eic1. Thus, our analyses not only determine the stoichiometry of the intact Mis18 holo-complex but also uncover the molecular mechanism by which Mis16 plays a centromere-specific role through Eic1 association.