Minor Lower Extremity Amputation Research Articles

Geographic variation in first lower extremity amputations related to diabetes and/or peripheral arterial disease

BackgroundTo assess trends of first cases of lower extremity amputations (LEA) related to diabetes and/or peripheral arterial disease (PAD), according to areas of residency and neighbourhood material/social deprivation quintiles, in the province of Quebec, Canada. MethodsUsing the Quebec Integrated Chronic Disease Surveillance System, we calculated crude and age-standardized annual incidence rates of first LEA (total, minor and major) among adults ≥40 years with diabetes and/or PAD between fiscal years 2006 to 2019. Area of residency was compiled in three categories: 1) Montreal/other census metropolitan areas (CMAs), 2) midsize agglomerations (10,000 to 100,000 inhabitants), and 3) small towns/rural areas (<10,000 inhabitants). We also stratified by neighbourhood material/social deprivation quintiles. One-year and 5-year all-cause mortality after first LEA was compared between areas of residency. ResultsAmong the 10,275 individuals who had a first LEA, age-standardized LEA rates remained stable between 2006 and 2019, while major LEA declined in all geographical areas whereas minor LEA increased (31.6%) in small towns/rural areas. In 2019, age-standardized LEA rates were higher in midsize agglomerations and small towns/rural areas compared with CMAs. Age-standardized LEA rates in 2019 were higher among the most deprived quintile compared with the most privileged quintile, for both material/social deprivation. No difference was observed in mortality after first LEA between areas of residency. ConclusionThere are health disparities in the burden of diabetes and PAD related first LEA in the province of Quebec. In order to improve preventive care and reduce the burden of LEA, targeted actions should be taken among the most deprived groups and rural settings.

Correlation of cerebral small vessel disease burden with outcome after lower extremity amputation

AimsThis study assessed whether changes associated with cerebral small vessel disease (CSVD) evaluated from head computed tomography (CT) images captured for non-related clinical purposes predict overall survival (OS), leg salvage (LS), and amputation-free survival (AFS) after lower extremity amputation (LEA). MethodsWe retrospectively included a cohort of 240 patients who had undergone a lower extremity amputation in Tampere University Hospital between the years 2007 and 2020 and had a head CT scan (within one year before amputation). A neuroradiologist graded the white matter lesions (WMLs) and reported infarcts, and the latter's effects on OS, LS, and AFS were evaluated. ResultsAltogether, 162 (67.5 %) and 91 (38.1 %) patients had WMLs and infarcts, respectively. Mild/moderate (HR 1.985, CI 95 % 1.317–2.992) and severe (HR 2.259, CI 95 % 1.501–3.399) WMLs and infarcts (HR 1.413, CI 95 % 1.029–1.940) were associated with inferior OS. After a minor amputation, mild/moderate (HR 2.012, CI 95 % 1.054–3.843) and severe (HR 3.879, CI 95 % 2.096–7.180) WMLs were similarly associated with inferior AFS. ConclusionsOverall, WML and infarcts detected on head CT scans were associated with impaired OS after LEA and AFS after minor LEA. Evaluation of CSVD could provide useful prognostic information for clinicians.

Rapid Access From Primary Care to a Multidisciplinary Clinic at Tertiary Care Improves Clinical Outcomes for Patients With Diabetic Foot Ulcers: Results From Diabetic Foot in Primary and Tertiary (DEFINITE) Care's Lower Extremity Amputation Prevention Program (LEAPP) Clinic.

Diabetic Foot in Primary and Tertiary (DEFINITE) Care is an inter-institutional, multidisciplinary team (MDT) program for patients with diabetic foot ulcers (DFU) within a healthcare cluster in Singapore. This is one of our subgroup analyses within DEFINITE Care, assessing clinical outcomes of lower extremity amputation prevention program (LEAPP), a multidisciplinary diabetic foot clinic, and non-LEAPP patients within the program. From June 2020 to June 2022, 2798 patients within the DEFINITE cohort completed a minimum of 12-month follow up. Of these patients, 20.6% were managed by LEAPP, whereas 79.4% were non-LEAPP patients. Patients in the LEAPP cohort were older with co-existing metabolic conditions and complications of diabetes. Using non-LEAPP cohort as the reference group and after adjusting for age, gender, ethnicity, comorbidities, and medications, there was a significantly lower risk of death (odds ratio [OR] 0.60, P = .001) and composite major lower extremity amputation (LEA) or death (OR 0.66, P = .002) among LEAPP patients at 1 year with longer mean days from enrollment to minor LEA, major LEA, and death. The adjusted 1-year healthcare utilization outcomes for LEAPP patients demonstrated an increase in inpatient admissions, primary care polyclinic visits, hospital specialist outpatient clinic (SOC) visits and elective day surgery procedures. Despite the increased in inpatients admissions, cumulative hospital length of stay in LEAPP patients were lower. This subgroup analysis has demonstrated that the MDT approach to caring for patients with DFU in tertiary centers not only improves mortality by 40%, but also delayed the incidence of minor LEA, major LEA, and death.

Five-Year Trends of Vascular Disease-Related Amputations in Romania: A Retrospective Database Study.

Background/Objectives: Lower extremity amputations (LEAs) are a burdensome complication of peripheral artery disease (PAD) and/or arterial embolism and thrombosis (AET). We assessed the trends in PAD- and/or AET-related LEAs in Romania. Methods: This retrospective study (2015-2019) analyzed data on minor and major LEAs in hospitalized patients recorded in the National School for Public Health, Management, and Health Education database. The absolute numbers and incidences of LEAs were analyzed by diagnosis type, year, age, sex, and amputation level. Results: Of 38,590 vascular disease-related amputations recorded nationwide, 36,162 were in PAD and 2428 in AET patients. The average LEA incidence in the general population was 34.73 (minimum: 31.96 in 2015; maximum: 36.57 in 2019). The average incidence of major amputations, amputations above the knee, hip amputations, amputations below the knee, and minor amputations was 16.21 (15.62 in 2015; 16.84 in 2018), 13.76 (13.33 in 2015; 14.28 in 2018), 0.29 (0.22 in 2017; 0.35 in 2019), 2.15 (2.00 in 2015; 2.28 in 2019), and 18.52 (16.34 in 2015; 20.12 in 2019), respectively. Yearly PAD- and/or AET-related amputations were significantly higher in men versus women. The overall number of LEAs increased with age, particularly in patients ≥ 70 years. The increase in the total number of amputations was mainly due to a constant rise in minor amputations for both groups, regardless of gender. Conclusions: PAD- and/or AET-related LEAs in Romania increased from 2015 to 2019, with men having a greater incidence than women. Raising awareness and effective management strategies are needed to prevent LEAs.

Postural control imbalance in individuals with a minor lower extremity amputation: a scoping review protocol.

Introduction Lower extremity amputations (LEA) impact the quality of life and physical abilities and increase the risk of developing secondary health complications. Current literature predominantly focuses on major LEA, leaving a gap in understanding biomechanics related to balance and postural control in minor LEA. The shifts towards increased rates of minor LEA, due to improved quality of care and patient management, highlights the need for a focused exploration of postural control deficits in this population. The scoping review will address this gap in the literature. Objectives The purpose of the review is to synthesize current research on postural control deficits following a minor foot amputation, focusing on any resections through or distal to the ankle joint, and to evaluate interventions aimed at improving balance in affected individuals. Inclusion criteria The review will encompass individuals of all ages who underwent a minor foot amputation, including various levels and etiologies. It will focus on quantitative data related to standing posture, ability to perform self-balanced activities of daily living, and external aids or treatments to improve postural control. The outcomes will include modifications in the sensation of balance, fall predictors, and biomechanical changes in postural control. Methods A preliminary search of MEDLINE (PubMed) was conducted to develop a full search strategy aimed at compiling all existing scientific articles on postural control and balance in individuals with a minor LEA. A comprehensive search will be performed across multiple databases and grey literature. Two reviewers will independently extract the data. The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool will be used to assess risk and quality. Discussion By emphasizing the understudied aspects of postural control imbalances induced by minor LEA, the review will highlight potential areas for therapeutic intervention and contribute to a better understanding of rehabilitation for those affected.

Initial handgrip strength as a predictive factor for amputation risk in diabetic foot patients

BackgroundWe aimed to analyze the prognostic significance of handgrip strength as predictor of lower extremity amputation at 1 year follow up in patients with type 2 diabetes. MethodsWe evaluated 526 patients with type 2 diabetes between August 2020, and, June 2022. We collected from the electronic medical records demographic variables, laboratory data and history of amputation. The handgrip strength was assessed using a handheld Smedley digital dynamometer following the NHANES Muscle Strenght/Grip Test Procedure. Low handgrip strength was defined for women as less than 16 kg and for men less than 27 kg. Outcome variable was major or minor lower extremity amputation. ResultsA total of 205 patients with complete data entered the study. Patients mean age was 59 years old, 37% were women and the mean diabetes disease duration was 14 years. Seventy-seven (37%) patients suffered from lower extremity mputations (26 major and 51 minor amputations). After controlling for age, gender, presence of peripheral artery disease, body mass index and white cell counts as confounder variables, patients with low handgrip had an increased risk for amputations (Odds Ratio 2.17; 95% confidence Interval: 1.09–4.32; <0.001). ConclusionLow handgrip stregth is an independent prognostic marker for lower limb amputation at one year in patients with diabetes.

Risk Factors for Lower Extremity Minor Amputation Conversion to Major Amputation

Minor lower extremity amputations (LEAs) have become an important part of the limb salvage approach but are not as benign as previously thought. This study investigates the difference in outcome between toe/ray versus midfoot amputations and the risk factors for major amputation conversion associated with each procedure. We performed retrospective chart review of foot amputation patients at a single tertiary care medical center with a primary end point of conversion to major amputation and secondary end points of 1-year wound healing and mortality rate. We collected data on relevant medical comorbidities, noninvasive vascular imaging, revascularization, repeat amputations, wound healing rate, and 1-year mortality. Patients were separated into toe/ray amputations versus midfoot amputation groups and compared using descriptive statistics, Chi-squared tests, Cox proportional hazards, and a multivariate logistic regression model. A total of 375 amputations were included in the analysis. 65.3% (245 patients) included toe/ray amputations and 34.7% (130 patients) included midfoot amputations. We compared these 2 cohorts with regard to their rate of conversion to repeat minor and/or major amputation in addition to overall mortality. The toe/ray group underwent more repeat minor amputations within 1year after index amputation (34.7% vs. 21.5%, P=0.008) and wound healing (epithelization) at 90days was also higher in this group. The midfoot group had a higher conversion to major LEA within 1year on univariate analysis (20.8 vs. 6.9%, P<0.001). Overall 1-year mortality was 6.17% and there was no significant difference between groups. While there is a consistency with previous studies that found no significant overall difference in mortality between types of minor LEA, we have extended this previous work by demonstrating the independent risk factors for conversion to major amputation between types of minor LEA. Comparing these 2 groups will assist surgeons in choosing the appropriate level of amputations and will enhance patient's understanding of their chance of wound healing and risk of repeat amputation.

Risk Factors for Major Lower Limb Amputation and Effect of Endovascular Revascularization in Patients with Diabetic Foot Wound.

Major lower extremity amputation (LEA) such as below-knee or above-knee amputations can result in more physical disabilities and poorer socioeconomic functions than minor LEAs in diabetic foot ulcer (DFU). Therefore, identification of risk factors for major LEA and investigation of effectiveness of endovascular revascularization are critical for prevention and better prognosis of DFU patients. From January 2014 to December 2017, a total of 125 patients with DFU treated with any level of amputation were included in this study. Demographic, diabetes-related, DFU-related and -relevant laboratory information were investigated to predict major amputation. To identify risk factors for major amputation, logistic regression analysis was performed for each variable. The effectiveness of endovascular revascularization treatment was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier survival curves. Major amputation was performed for 22 of 125 patients. Multivariate logistic regression analysis indicated that DM duration, peripheral arterial occlusive disease (PAOD) previous amputation, abscess, Wagner grade, CRP and albumin were significant risk factors for major amputation in DFU patients. PAOD was the most important risk factor. Major amputation-free survival rate at 5years was 97.4% in a non-PAOD group, 58.3% in a PAOD without revascularization group, and 88.0% in a PAOD with revascularization group, showing statistically significant differences among them. The duration of DM, PAOD, previous amputation, abscess, Wagner grade, CRP and albumin were major risk factors for major LEA in DFU patients. The most valuable and critical finding was that revascularization in diabetic foot patients with PAOD significantly improved major amputation-free survival rates.

Risk Prediction of Diabetic Foot Amputation Using Machine Learning and Explainable Artificial Intelligence.

Diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) are serious complications of diabetes which can lead to lower extremity amputations (LEAs). Risk prediction models can identify high-risk patients who can benefit from early intervention. Machine learning (ML) methods have shown promising utility in medical applications. Explainable modeling can help its integration and acceptance. This study aims to develop a risk prediction model using ML algorithms with explainability for LEA in DFU patients. This study is a retrospective review of 2559 inpatient DFU episodes in a tertiary institution from 2012 to 2017. Fifty-one features including patient demographics, comorbidities, medication, wound characteristics, and laboratory results were reviewed. Outcome measures were the risk of major LEA, minor LEA and any LEA. Machine learning models were developed for each outcome, with model performance evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, balanced-accuracy and F1-score. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) was applied to interpret the model for explainability. Model performance for prediction of major, minor, and any LEA event achieved ROC of 0.820, 0.637, and 0.756, respectively, with XGBoost, XGBoost, and Gradient Boosted Trees algorithms demonstrating best results for each model, respectively. Using SHAP, key features that contributed to the predictions were identified for explainability. Total white cell (TWC) count, comorbidity score and red blood cell count contributed highest weightage to major LEA event. Total white cell, eosinophils, and necrotic eschar in the wound contributed most to any LEA event. Machine learning algorithms performed well in predicting the risk of LEA in a patient with DFU. Explainability can help provide clinical insights and identify at-risk patients for early intervention.

Impact of diabetes on medical costs in the pre- and postoperative year of lower extremity amputations in Belgium

AimsTo compare the medical costs of individuals undergoing lower extremity amputation (LEA) in Belgium with those of amputation-free individuals. MethodsBelgian citizens undergoing LEAs in 2014 were identified. The median costs per capita in euros for the 12 months preceding and following minor and major LEAs were compared with those of matched amputation-free individuals. ResultsA total of 3324 Belgian citizens underwent LEAs (2295 minor, 1029 major), 2130 of them had diabetes. The comparison group included 31,716 individuals. Amputation was associated with high medical costs (individuals with diabetes: major LEA €49,735, minor LEA €24,243, no LEA €2,877 in the year preceding amputation; €45,740, €21,445 and €2,284, respectively, in the post-amputation year). Significantly higher costs were observed in the individuals with (versus without) diabetes in all groups. This difference diminished with higher amputation levels. Individuals undergoing multiple LEAs generated higher costs (individuals with diabetes: €39,313–€89,563 when LEAs preceded index amputation; €46,629–€92,877 when LEAs followed index amputation). Individuals dying in the year after a major LEA generated remarkably lower costs. ConclusionsLEA-related medical costs were high. Diabetes significantly impacted costs, but differences in costs diminished with higher amputation levels. Individuals with multiple amputations generated the highest costs.

Analysis of Lower Extremity Amputations from the SerbVasc Registry.

Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) and diabetes are the major causes of lower extremity amputations (LEAs) worldwide. Morbidity and mortality in patients with LEAs are high with an associated significant burden on the global health system. The aim of this article is to report the overall morbidity and mortality rates after major and minor LEAs from the Serbian Vascular Registry (SerbVasc), with an analysis of predictive factors that influenced adverse outcomes. SerbVasc was created in 2019 as a part of the Vascunet collaboration that is aiming to include all vascular procedures from 21 hospitals in Serbia. Prevalence of diabetes among patients with LEAs, previous revascularization procedures, the degree and the type of foot infection and tissue loss, and overall morbidity and mortality rates were analyzed, with a special reference to mortality predictors. In the period from January 2020 to December 2022, data on 702 patients with LEAs were extracted from the SerbVasc registry, mean age of 69.06±10.63 years. Major LEAs were performed in 59%, while minor LEAs in 41% of patients. Diabetes was seen in 65.1% of the patients, with 44% of them being on insulin therapy. Before LEA, only 20.3% of patients had previous peripheral revascularization. Soft tissue infection, irreversible acute ischemia, and Fontaine III and IV grade ischemia were the most common causes of above-the-knee amputations while diabetic foot was the most common cause of transphalangeal and toe amputations. The infection rate was 3.7%, the re-amputation rate was 5.7%, and the overall mortality rate was 6.9%, with intrahospital mortality in patients with above-the-knee amputation of 11.1%. The most significant intrahospital mortality predictors were age >65 years (p<0.001), chronic kidney disease (CKD) (p<0.001), ischemic heart disease (IHD) (p=0.001), previous myocardial revascularization (p=0.017), emergency type of admission (p<0.001), not using aspirin (p=0.041), using previous anticoagulation therapy (p=0.003), and postoperative complications (p<0.001). The main predictors of increased mortality after LEAs from the SerbVasc registry are age >65 years, CKD, IHD, previous myocardial revascularization, emergency type of admission, not using aspirin, using previous anticoagulation therapy, and postoperative complications. Taking into account high mortality rates after LEAs and a small proportion of previous peripheral revascularization, the work should be done on early diagnosis and timely treatment of PAD hopefully leading to decreased number of LEAs and overall mortality. Mortality after lower limb amputation from the SerbVasc register is high. A small number of previously revascularized patients is of particular clinical importance, bearing in mind that the main reasons for above-the-knee amputations were irreversible ischemia, Fontaine III and Fontaine IV grade ischemia. Lack of diagnostics procedures and late recognition of patients with PAD, led to subsequent threating limb ischemia and increased amputation rates. The work should be done on early diagnosis and timely treatment of PAD in Serbia, hopefully leading to an increased number of PAD procedures, decreased number of LEAs, and lower overall mortality.

The impact of diabetes on mortality rates after lower extremity amputation.

To assess the impact of diabetes, amputation level, sex and age on mortality rates after lower extremity amputation (LEA) in Belgium, and to assess temporal trends in one-year survival rates from 2009 to 2018. Nationwide data on individuals who underwent minor and major LEA from 2009 to 2018 were collected. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were constructed. A Cox regression model with time-varying coefficients was used to estimate the likelihood of mortality after LEA in individuals with or without diabetes. Matched amputation-free individuals with or without diabetes were used for comparison. Time trends were analysed. 41 304 amputations were performed: 13 247 major and 28 057 minor. Five-year mortality rates in individuals with diabetes were 52% and 69% after minor and major LEA, respectively (individuals without diabetes: 45% and 63%, respectively). In the first six postoperative months, no differences in mortality rates were found between individuals with or without diabetes. Later, hazard ratios (HRs) for mortality in individuals with diabetes (compared with no diabetes) after minor LEA ranged from 1.38 to 1.52, and after major LEA from 1.35 to 1.46 (all p≤0.005). Among individuals without LEA, HRs for mortality in diabetes (versus no diabetes) were systematically higher compared to the HRs for mortality in diabetes (versus no diabetes) after minor and major LEA. One-year survival rates did not change for individuals with diabetes. In the first six postoperative months, mortality rates after LEA were not different between individuals with or without diabetes; later, diabetes was significantly associated with increased mortality. However, as HRs for mortality were higher in amputation-free individuals, diabetes impacts mortality less in the minor and major amputation groups relative to the comparison group of individuals without LEA.

Evolution in Trends of Primary Lower-Extremity Amputations Associated With Diabetes or Peripheral Artery Disease From 2006 to 2019.

Given the importance in prevention of lower extremity amputations (LEAs) associated with diabetes or peripheral artery disease (PAD), we sought to document the trends of primary LEA in Québec, Canada, from years 2006 to2019. Using the Québec Integrated Chronic Disease Surveillance System, we calculated crude and age-standardized annual incidence rates of primary LEA associated with diabetes and PAD among adults ≥ 40 years (99% confidence intervals [CI]), and all-cause 1-year mortality proportion trends following a primary LEA (95% CI), stratified by minor or major as the highest level of LEA during the same hospital stay and age groups. Trends were assessed using multivariate regression models. In 2019, the crude rate of primary LEA was 116.0 per 100,000 (n= 825) with 93.7 and 21.9 per 100,000 of minor (n=665) and major (n= 160) LEA, respectively. A tendency of decrease by 8% (-15.0 to 0.4%) of age-standardized incidence of primary LEA was observed between 2006 and 2019, while the absolute number of primary LEA increased from 610 to 825 cases. Minor LEA increased by 14.2% (3.7 to 25.9%) and major LEA decreased by 49.5% (-57.1 to -40.5%). Incidence trends remained stable among the 40 to 64 years, and declined by 14.6% and 20.1% for the 65 to 79 and ≥ 80 years of age groups, respectively. Major LEA decreased in all age groups, whereas minor LEA increased by 26.2% among the patients 40 to 64 years of age only. Age-standardized 1-year mortality decreased by 35.1% (95% CI, -43.4 to -25.7%) between 2006 and 2019, with a crude 1-year mortality of 11.3% in2019. The reduction of major LEA and 1-year mortality are encouraging, although increased minor LEA, especially in younger age groups, emphasizes the importance to improve preventive care further.

Temporal trends in minor and major lower extremity amputation in people with type 2 diabetes: The Fremantle Diabetes Study.

To determine whether incident minor and major lower extremity amputations (LEAs) have declined in recent decades in type 2 diabetes. Participants with type 2 diabetes from the community-based Fremantle Diabetes Study Phases I (FDS1; n = 1,296, mean age 64.0 years, recruited 1993-1996) and II (FDS2; n = 1,509, mean age 65.4 years, recruited 2008-2011) were followed from entry to incident minor/major LEA, death or five years. Cox regression determined hazard ratios (HRs) for each outcome for FDS2 versus FDS1 and independent predictors of incident minor and major LEA in the combined cohort. Age- and sex-adjusted HRs (95% CIs) in FDS2 versus FDS1 for incident minor and major LEA were, respectively, 0.60 (0.27, 1.35) and 0.59 (0.22, 1.59). Higher glycated haemoglobin, urine albumin: creatinine (uACR) ratio and peripheral sensory neuropathy (PSN) were independent predictors of incident minor LEA. Higher fasting serum glucose, peripheral arterial disease (PAD), end-stage kidney disease and prior diabetes-related minor LEA were associated with incident major LEA. There were non-significant reductions of approximately 40% in incident minor and major LEA in community-based people with type 2 diabetes during the 15 years between FDS Phases. Predictors of minor/major LEA confirm distinct high-risk patient groups with implications for clinical management.

Tackling diabetic foot: limb salvage during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Lower extremity amputation resulting from diabetic foot ulcer, with neuropathic and/or ischemic etiologies, remains a devastating and costly complication of diabetes mellitus. This study evaluated changes in care delivery of diabetic foot ulcer patients during the COVID-19 pandemic. A longitudinal assessment evaluating the ratio of major lower extremity amputation to minor lower extremity amputations after implementation of novel strategies to combat access restrictions was compared to the pre-COVID-19 era. The ratio of major to minor lower extremity amputation (i.e. the high-to-low ratio) was assessed at two academic institutions, the University of Michigan, and University of Southern California, in a population of patients with diabetes who had direct access to multidisciplinary foot care clinics in the 2 years prior to the pandemic and the first 2 years of the COVID-19 pandemic. Patient characteristics and volumes including patients with diabetes and those with a diabetic foot ulcer were similar between eras. In addition, inpatient diabetic foot-related admissions were similar, but were suppressed by government shelter in placed mandates and subsequent COVID-19 variants surges (e.g. delta, omicron). In the control group, the Hi-Lo ratio increased every 6 months by an average of 11.8%. Meanwhile, following STRIDE implementation during the pandemic, the Hi-Lo ratio reduced by (-)11% (p < 0.001) and doubled limb salvage efforts as compared to the baseline era. The reduction of the Hi-Lo ratio was not influenced significant by patient volumes or inpatient admissions for foot infections. These findings signify the importance of podiatric care in the at-risk diabetic foot population. Through strategic planning and rapid implementation of at-risk diabetic foot ulcer triage, multidisciplinary teams were able to maintain accessible care during the pandemic which resulted in a reduction of amputations. Furthermore, this manuscript highlights the value of the Hi-Lo ratio as an indicator of institutional limb salvage efforts.

Diabetes-Related Lower Extremity Amputations in Romania: Patterns and Changes between 2015 and 2019

Lower extremity amputations (LEAs) are a feared complication of diabetes mellitus (DM). Here we evaluated the recent trends in DM-related LEAs in Romania. We collected data from a national database regarding minor and major LEAs performed between 2015 and 2019 in patients with DM admitted to a public hospital. Absolute numbers of LEAs were presented by year, diabetes type, sex and age; incidence rates of LEAs in the general population were also calculated. Over the study period, 40,499 LEAs were recorded nationwide (83.16% in persons with type 2 DM [T2DM]); on average, the number of LEAs increased by 5.7%/year. This trend was driven by an increased number of LEAs in patients with T2DM; in patients with type 1 DM (T1DM), LEAs decreased over the study period. In patients with T2DM, the increase in minor LEAs was more pronounced than that in major LEAs. The overall number of LEAs showed an increasing trend with age (r = 0.72), which was most pronounced in patients aged ≥70 years. Men had a higher frequency of LEAs than women, regardless of DM type. These data support renewed efforts to prevent and decrease the burden of amputations among patients with DM.

Diabetic foot in primary and tertiary (DEFINITE) Care: A health services innovation in coordination of diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) Care within a healthcare cluster - 18-month results from an observational population health cohort study.

Diabetic Foot in Primary and Tertiary (DEFINITE) Care is an inter-institutional and multi-disciplinary team (MDT) health systems innovation programme at a healthcare cluster in Singapore. We aim to achieve coordinated MDT care across primary and tertiary care for patients with diabetic foot ulcers (DFU), within our public healthcare cluster - an integrated network of seven primary care polyclinics and two acute care tertiary hospitals (1700-bed and 800-bed) with a total catchment population of 2.2 million residents. Results from prospective DEFINITE Care is referenced against a retrospective 2013-2017 cohort, which was previously published. Cardiovascular profile of the study population is compared against the same population's profile in the preceding 12 months. Between June 2020 and December 2021, there were 3475 unique patients with DFU with mean age at 65.9 years, 61.2% male, mean baseline HbA1c at 8.3% with mean diabetes duration at 13.3 years, mean diabetes complication severity index (DCSI) at 5.6 and mean Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) at 6.8. In the 12-months preceding enrolment to DEFINITE Care, 35.5% had surgical foot debridement, 21.2% had minor lower extremity amputation (LEA), 7.5% had major LEA whilst 16.8% had revascularisation procedures. At 18-months after the implementation of DEFINITE Care programme, the absolute minor and major amputation rates were 8.7% (n=302) and 5.1% (n=176), respectively, equating to a minor and major LEA per 100000 population at 13.7 and 8.0, respectively. This represents an 80% reduction in minor amputation rates (P < .001) and a 35% reduction in major amputation rates (P=.005) when referenced against a retrospective 2013-2017 cohort, which had minor and major LEA per 100000 population at 68.9 and 12.4, respectively. As compared to the preceding 12 months, there was also a significant improvement in cardiovascular profile (glycemic and lipid control) within the DEFINITE population, with improved mean HbAc1 (7.9% from 8.4%, P < .001), low-density lipoprotein (LDL) levels (2.1 mmol/L from 2.2, P < .001), total cholesterol (3.9 mmol/L from 4.1, P < .001) and triglycerides levels (1.6 mmol/L from 1.8, P=.002). Multivariate analysis revealed a history of minor amputation in the preceding 12 months to be an independent predictor for major and minor amputation within the study period of 18 months (Hazard Ratio 3.4 and 1.8, respectively, P < .001). In conclusion, within DEFINITE care, 18-month data showed a significant reduction of minor and major LEA rates, with improved medical optimisation and cardiovascular profile within the study population.

Trends in diabetes-related complications in Singapore, 2013-2020: A registry-based study.

BackgroundDiabetes mellitus (DM) is a growing global health problem. In Singapore, the prevalence of Type 2 DM is rising, but comprehensive information about trends in DM-related complications is lacking.ObjectivesWe utilized the Singapore Health Services (SingHealth) diabetes registry (SDR) to assess trends in DM micro and macro-vascular complications at the population level, explore factors influencing these trends.MethodsWe studied trends for ten DM-related complications: ischemic heart disease (IHD), acute myocardial infarction (AMI), peripheral arterial disease (PAD) and strokes, diabetic eye complications, nephropathy, neuropathy, diabetic foot, major and minor lower extremity amputation (LEA). The complications were determined through clinical coding in hospital (inpatient and outpatient) and primary care settings within the SingHealth cluster. We described event rates for the complications in 4 age-bands. Joinpoint regression was used to identify significant changes in trends.ResultsAmong 222,705 patients studied between 2013 and 2020. 48.6% were female, 70.7% Chinese, 14.7% Malay and 10.6% Indian with a mean (SD) age varying between 64.6 (12.5) years in 2013 and 65.7 (13.2) years in 2020. We observed an increase in event rates in IHD, PAD, stroke, diabetic eye complications nephropathy, and neuropathy. Joinpoints was observed for IHD and PAD between 2016 to 2018, with subsequent plateauing of event rates. Major and minor LEA event rates decreased through the study period.ConclusionWe found that DM and its complications represent an important challenge for healthcare in Singapore. Improvements in the trends of DM macrovascular complications were observed. However, trends in DM microvascular complications remain a cause for concern.

Hyperbaric oxygen therapy as an adjunct to the standard wound care for the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers in Indian patients: a cost utility analysis

ABSTRACT Background Diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) is a common complication of diabetes. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) is an adjunct treatment that expedites the healing of DFU. Aim To evaluate the cost-utility of using standard wound care (SWC) plus HBOT as compared to SWC alone for the treatment of DFU from a societal perspective in the Indian context. Method A Markov decision analysis model comparing SWC with and without HBOT was developed. Data for the model were derived from relevant literature and secondary data from India. The main outcome measures were minor and major lower extremity amputations (LEA) averted, incremental quality-adjusted-life-years (QALY) gained, incremental costs, incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) per amputation averted and ICER per QALY gained. Sensitivity and threshold analyses were also done. Result HBOT, when added to SWC, lowered the proportion of minor LEA and major LEA among patients with DFU by 6.1% and 4.2%, respectively. The discounted ICER was INR 193,939 [95% CI: 186,745–203,753] or US$ 2,621 [95% CI: 2,524–2,753] per QALY gained. Conclusion SWC plus HBOT is not cost-effective in India. Additional information is required on patient experiences with adjunctive HBOT, if it were to be adopted as the standard of care in India.

Indocyanine Green Fluorescence Angiography in Minor Lower Extremity Amputations: A Useful Technique?

Complications remain despite conventional methods aimed at improving survivorship of lower extremity amputations. High rates of wound dehiscence, readmission, and revision surgery warrant the development of innovative methods to improve amputation survivorship. One such method employs the use of indocyanine green dye (ICG); an inert chemical injected intraoperatively which can be used to visualize dermal blood flow in real time. There is little objective data available to help guide the use of indocyanine green in limb salvage procedures. The present study compares a group of 31 patients undergoing minor lower extremity amputation with the use of indocyanine green with a control group of 62 patients in which traditional methods were used. Minimum follow-up of 9 months was obtained, leaving 93 patients in total for analysis. Success was defined as a healed amputation within 60 days of follow-up. Uneventful amputation healing occurred in 35.5% and 33.9% of indocyanine green and control patients, respectively. Overall, there was no significant difference in outcomes between groups (p = .965), or success versus failure (p = 1.0). Patient undergoing minor lower extremity amputation with the use of ICG fluorescence angiography did not have statistically inferior outcomes to patients who underwent amputations at the same level with traditional assessments of perfusion. Further research involving the use of this technique is warranted.