Minor Low Anterior Resection Syndrome Research Articles

Feasibility Study of Transanal Irrigation Using a Colostomy Irrigation System in Patients With Low Anterior Resection Syndrome.

Low anterior resection syndrome has a negative impact on quality of life. Intestinal irrigation is a method of lavage consisting of a scheduled evacuation. This study aims to evaluate functional and quality-of-life outcomes in patients with low anterior resection syndrome after transanal irrigation using a colostomy irrigation system. This was a prospective case series. This study presents a single-center experience at a tertiary oncological center in an upper-middle-income country. Patients classified as having minor or major low anterior resection syndrome 12 months after their operation were selected. Transanal irrigation was performed using an ostomy irrigation kit. Questionnaires assessing patients' bowel function (low anterior resection syndrome and Wexner score) and quality of life (Short Form-36 questionnaire) were applied before and after treatment. The primary outcomes were low anterior resection syndrome score and quality-of-life improvement after a 12-month treatment. Of the 22 patients included, 20 had major and 2 had minor low anterior resection syndrome, with a median score of 39, especially high rates of incontinence for liquid stool (21; 95.5%), clustering (21; 95.5%), and urgency (17; 77.3%). All patients successfully completed the 3-day training, and there were no complications during the treatment. After the 12-month period, the median score was 8, with 90% of the patients classified as having "no syndrome" and great improvement in all domains of this score. The most improved quality-of-life sections were patient vitality (p = 0.025) and physical (p = 0.002), social (p = 0.001), and emotional aspects (p = 0.001). The study was limited by its small sample size and the limited follow-up period. This study presents a safe implementation protocol of an ostomy irrigation device for transanal irrigation. It also adds to the literature that transanal irrigation is a safe, effective, and easily implemented procedure for patients with low anterior resection syndrome with a significant improvement in quality of life. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B563.ESTUDIO DE FACTIBILIDAD DE LA IRRIGACIÓN TRANSANAL UTILIZANDO EL SISTEMA DE IRRIGACIÓN PARA COLOSTOMÍA EN PACIENTES CON SÍNDROME DE RESECCIÓN ANTERIOR BAJAANTECEDENTES:El síndrome de resección anterior baja tiene un impacto negativo en la calidad de vida de los pacientes. La irrigación intestinal es un método de lavado que consiste en evacuaciones programadas.OBJETIVOS:Evaluar los resultados de la funcionalidad e impacto en la calidad de vida de los pacientes con síndrome de resección anterior y baja posterior a la irrigación transanal utilizando un sistema de irrigación de colostomía.DISEÑO:Es estudio prospectivo de una serie de casos.ESCENARIO:En este estudio se muestra la experiencia de un centro oncológico de tercer nivel en un país en vías de desarrollo.PACIENTES:Aquellos clasificados como síndrome con afección en menor o mayor grado doce meses después de la cirugía.METODO:Se efectuó irrigación transanal utilizando un equipo de irrigación de estomas. Se aplicaron cuestionarios para valorar la función intestinal de los pacientes (síndrome de resección anterior baja y la escala de Wexner) y para calidad de vida (Cuestionario Corto-36) antes y después del tratamiento.EVALUACION DE LOS RESULTADOS PRINCIPALES:Los principales resultados se obtuvieron de la escala del síndrome de resección baja y la mejoría en la calidad vida doce meses después de tratamiento.RESULTADOS:De los veintidós pacientes incluidos, veinte presentaron manifestaciones mayores del síndrome de resección baja y dos, manifestaciones menores. Con una media de treinta y nueve, se encontraron, especialmente, altos índices de incontinencia a líquidos (21; 95'5%) hiperdefecación "clustering" (21; 95'5%) y urgencia (17; 77'3%). Todos los pacientes completaron en forma satisfactoria el entrenamiento de tres días sin presentarse complicaciones durante el tratamiento. Al término del mes doce la media fue de ocho, con el 90% de los pacientes clasificados como "sin síndrome" y se observó una mejoría substancial en todos los puntos de la evaluación. Las secciones de calidad de vida que mostraron una mejoría significativa fueron: la vitalidad del paciente (p = 0'025), física (p = 0'002), social (p = 0'001) y emocional (p = 0'001).LIMITACIONES:El tamaño de la muestra es pequeño y el tiempo de seguimiento corto.CONCLUSIONES:Este estudio muestra la implementación de un protocolo seguro para la irrigación de estomas mediante un dispositivo transanal. Además contribuye con el concepto en la literatura de que la seguridad de la irrigación transanal es seguro, efectivo y facilmente reproducible para pacientes con síndrome de resección anterior baja con una mejoría significativa en la calidad de vida. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B563. (Traducción-Dr. Miguel Esquivel-Herrera).

Clinical Utility and Characteristics of the LARS Score Compared to the CCIS.

The low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) score (LS) has been widely validated and has become an international tool for evaluating postoperative bowel dysfunction. However, many physicians still use the conventional incontinence scores in LARS treatment. Moreover, interpretation of LS and its relationship with conventional incontinence scores are not yet well understood. Here we compared the LS with the Cleveland Clinic Incontinence Score (CCIS) to clarify the clinical utility and characteristics of the LARS score. We performed a multicentre observational study, recruiting 246 rectal cancer patients following sphincter-preserving surgery. Patients completed the LS, CCIS, and SF36 questionnaires. The response rate was 76.4%, and a total of 180 patients were analysed. The LS was strongly correlated with the CCIS (P < 0.001, rs = 0.727). However, among 116 patients determined to not have incontinence (CCIS 0-5), 51 (44%) were diagnosed with LARS (29 with minor LARS and 22 with major LARS). Among 68 patients without LARS, only 3 were diagnosed as having incontinence (CCIS > 6). In comparison with background factors, aging and elapsed time were associated with only LS. High LS and CCIS both showed significant quality-of-life impairment as assessed by the SF-36. This is the first study to determine the difference in the numeric values between the CCIS and LS. The LS can be a convenient tool for LARS screening, identifying a wide range of patients with LARS, including those with incontinence evaluated by CCIS. Assessment using the CCIS may often underestimate LARS.

Trajectory of change of low anterior resection syndrome over time after restorative proctectomy for rectal adenocarcinoma.

Restorative proctectomy for rectal cancer is associated with a high incidence of low anterior resection syndrome (LARS), but few studies report longitudinal results for bowel function. The aim of our study was to examine the trajectory of change of LARS over the first 18months after restorative proctectomy for rectal cancer. A prospective database measuring functional outcomes in rectal cancer patients from a single university-affiliated specialist colorectal referral center from 10/2018 to 03/2020 was queried. Patients were included in this study if they underwent restorative proctectomy for rectal cancer and had at least three assessments in the first 18months after primary surgery or after closure of proximal diversion. Bowel function was assessed using the LARS score, administered at every surveillance follow-up after restoration of bowel continuity. Latent-class growth curve (trajectory) analysis was used to identify different trajectories of LARS changes over the first 18months and group patients into these trajectory groups. These groups were then compared to identify predictors for each trajectory. A total of 95 patients were included (63 males, mean age. 61.3 ± 12.5years). Trajectory analysis identified three distinct trajectory groups. Group 1 had stable minimal LARS over time (26%). Group 2 had early LARS scores consistent with the minor LARS category and improved with time (28%). Group 3 had persistently high LARS scores (45%). Neoadjuvant therapy, intersphincteric resection, and proximal diversion were more common in group 3. We identified three main trajectories of change of LARS in the 18months after restorative proctectomy. These data may be used to better inform patients of their expected postoperative bowel function.

Local Excision ± Chemoradiotherapy vs. Total Mesorectal Excision for Early Rectal Cancer: Case-Matched Analysis of Long-Term Results.

Background: Our aim was to compare the bowel function and oncologic outcomes following these two treatment modalities.Materials and methods: This was a single-center study with 67 patients included between 2009 and 2018. A total of 32 patients underwent total mesorectal excision (TME) group and 35 transanal local excisions (LE) ± chemoradiation. We performed a case-matched analysis: we matched the patients by age, cancer stage, and comorbidities. Duration of operation, postoperative complications, length of hospital stay, and long-term functional and oncological outcomes were compared. We calculated oncological outcomes using Kaplan–Meier Cox diagrams. In addition, we used a low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) score for the bowel function assessment.Results: Mean operation time in the LE group was 58.8 ± 45 min compared with the TME group that was 121.1 ± 42 min (p = 0.032). Complications were seen in 5.7% in LE group and 15.62% in TME group (p = 0.043). ~85.2% of the patients had no LARS in LE group compared with 54.5% in TME group (p = 0.018). Minor LARS was 7.4% in LE group compared with 31.8% in TME group (p = 0.018); major LARS was 7.4 and 13.7%, respectively (p = 0.474). Hospital stay was 2.77 days in LE group compared with 9.21 days in TME group (p = 0.036). The overall survival was 68.78 months in LE group compared with 74.81 months in TME group (p = 0.964).Conclusion: Our results of a small sample size showed that local excision ± chemoradiation is a rather safe method for early rectal cancer compared with gold standard treatment. In addition, better bowel function is preserved with less postoperative complications and shorter hospital stays.

Comparative analysis of the Memorial Sloan Kettering Bowel Function Instrument and the Low Anterior Resection Syndrome Questionnaire for assessment of bowel dysfunction in rectal cancer patients after low anterior resection.

Neoadjuvant therapy and total mesorectal excision (TME) for rectal cancer are associated with bowel dysfunction symptoms known as low anterior resection syndrome (LARS). Our study compared the only two validated instruments-the LARS Questionnaire (LARS-Q) and the Memorial Sloan Kettering Bowel Function Instrument (MSK-BFI)-in rectal cancer patients undergoing sphincter-preserving TME. One hundred and ninety patients undergoing sphincter-preserving TME for Stage I-III rectal cancer completed the MSK-BFI and LARS-Q simultaneously at a median time of 12 (range 1-43) months after restoration of bowel continuity. Associations between the MSK-BFI total/subscale scores and the LARS-Q score were investigated using Spearman rank correlation (r s ). Discriminant validity for the two questionnaires was assessed, and the questionnaires were compared with the European Quality of Life Instrument. Major LARS was identified in 62% of patients. The median MSK-BFI scores for no LARS, minor LARS and major LARS were 76.5, 70 and 57, respectively. We found a strong association between MSK-BFI and LARS-Q (r s -0.79). The urgency/soilage subscale (r s -0.7) and the frequency subscale (rs -0.68) of MSK-BFI strongly correlated with LARS-Q. Low correlation was observed between the MSK-BFI diet subscale and LARS-Q (r s -0.39). On multivariate analysis, both questionnaires showed worse bowel function in patients with distal tumours. A low to moderate correlation with the European Quality of Life Instrument was observed for both questionnaires. The MSK-BFI and LARS-Q showed good correlation and similar discriminant validity. As the LARS-Q is easier to complete, it may be considered the preferred tool to screen for bowel dysfunction.

Preoperative chemoradiotherapy affects postoperative outcomes and functional results in patients treated with transanal endoscopic microsurgery for rectal neoplasms.

The aim of this study was to quantify the incidence of short-term postoperative complications and functional disorders at 1year from transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) for rectal neoplasms, to compare patients treated with TEM alone and with TEM after preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and to analyse factors influencing postoperative morbidity and functional outcomes. A retrospective study was conducted on all patients treated with TEM for rectal neoplasms at our institution in January 2000-December 2017. Data from a prospectively maintained database were retrospectively analysed. Patients were divided into two groups: adenoma or early rectal cancer (no CRT group) and locally advanced extraperitoneal rectal cancer with major or complete clinical response after preoperative CRT (CRT group). Short-term postoperative mortality and morbidity and the functional results at 1year were recorded. The two groups were compared, and a statistical analysis of factors influencing postoperative morbidity and functional outcomes was performed. Functional outcome was also evaluated with the low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) score (0-20 no LARS, 21-29 minor LARS and 30-42 major LARS). One hundred and thirteen patients (71 males, 42 females, median age 64years [range 41-80years]) were included in the study (46 in the CRT group). The overall postoperative complication rate was 23.0%, lower in the noCRT group (p < 0.001), but only 2.7% were grade ≥ 3. The most frequent complication was suture dehiscence (17.6%), which occurred less frequently in the noCRT group (p < 0.001). At 1year from TEM, the most frequent symptoms was urgency (11.9%, without significant differences between the CRT group and the noCRT group); the noCRT group experienced a lower rate of soiling than the CRT group (0% vs. 7.7%; p: 0.027). The incidence of LARS was evaluated in 47 patients from May 2012 on and was 21.3% occurring less frequently in the noCRT group (10% vs. 41.2%; p: 0.012). Only 6.4% of the patients evaluated experienced major LARS. In multivariate analysis, preoperative CRT significantly worsened postoperative morbidity and functional outcomes. TEM is a safe procedure associated with only low risk of severe postoperative complications and major LARS. Preoperative CRT seems to increase the rate of postoperative morbidity after TEM and led to worse functional outcomes at 1year after surgery.

Multicenter investigation of bowel evacuation function after transanal total mesorectal excision for mid-low rectal cancer

To determine the effect of transanal total mesorectal excision (taTME) procedure on the postoperative bowel evacuation function of patients with low rectal cancer. Bowel evacuation function was investigated in 316 patients with rectal cancer after taTME in 18 hospitals in China. Low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) score, Wexner score, and EORTC QLQ-C30 were used for functional evaluation. The association between perioperative risk factors and LARS score was determined by univariate and multivariate analyses. The prevalence rate of no LARS, minor LARS, and major LARS in patients after taTME was 39.9%, 28.2%, and 31.9%, respectively. The two most frequently reported symptoms of LARS after taTME were bowel clustering (72.8%) and fecal urgency (63.3%). Patients with major LARS had significantly higher Wexner score and worse global health status and financial difficulties according to the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire than those without major LARS. Preoperative chemoradiotherapy was an independent risk factor of major LARS occurrence after taTME (OR: 3.503, P = 0.044); existing preoperative constipation (OR: 0.082, P = 0.040) and manual anastomosis (OR: 4.536, P = 0.021) were favorable factors affecting bowel evacuatory function within 12 months after taTME, but for patients whose follow-up time was longer than 12 months, postoperative chemoradiotherapy (OR: 8.790, P = 0.001) and defunctioning stoma (OR: 3.962, P = 0.010) were independent risk factors. The bowel evacuation function after taTME is acceptable. Perioperative chemoradiotherapy, anastomotic method, and preoperative constipation are factors associated with bowel dysfunction after taTME.

Validation of the low anterior resection syndrome score in finnish patients: preliminary results on quality of life in different lars severity groups.

Background and Aims:Low anterior resection syndrome is common after anterior resection for rectal cancer. Its severity can be tested with the low anterior resection syndrome score. We have translated the low anterior resection syndrome score to Finnish, and the aim of this study is to validate the translation.Materials and Methods:The translated Finnish low anterior resection syndrome score and European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer quality-of-life questionnaire-C30 and QLQ-CR29 questionnaires were sent to 159 surviving patients operated with anterior resection for rectal adenocarcinoma between 2007 and 2014 in a tertiary referral center. Psychometric properties of the translation were evaluated in comparison to quality-of-life scales and in different risk factor groups.Results:In the study, 104 (65%) patients returned the questionnaires. Of these, 56 (54%) had major low anterior resection syndrome, 26 (25%) had minor low anterior resection syndrome, and 22 (21%) had no low anterior resection syndrome. Patients with major low anterior resection syndrome had a significantly lower quality of life and more defecatory symptoms as assessed with the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer questionnaires compared with those with no low anterior resection syndrome. Patients operated with total mesorectal excision had significantly higher low anterior resection syndrome scores compared with those operated with partial mesorectal excision (median/interquartile range 32/15 and 29/11, respectively, p = 0.037). The test–retest validity of the translation was good with an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.77 (95% confidence interval 0.51–0.90).Conclusions:The Finnish low anterior resection syndrome score is a valid test in the assessment of postoperative bowel function and its impact on the quality of life. It can be implemented to use during regular follow-up visits of Finnish-speaking rectal cancer patients.

Colonic transit in patients after anterior resection: prospective, comparative study using single-photon emission CT/CT scintigraphy

Bowel dysfunction after anterior resection is well documented, but its pathophysiology remains poorly understood. No study has assessed whether postoperative variation in colonic transit contributes to symptoms. This study measured colonic transit using planar scintigraphy and single-photon emission CT (SPECT)/CT in patients after anterior resection, stratified according to postoperative bowel function. Symptoms were assessed using the low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) score. Following gallium-67 ingestion, scintigraphy was performed at predefined time points. Nine regions of interest were defined, and geometric centre (GC), percentage isotope retained, GC velocity index and colonic half-clearance time (T½ ) determined. Transit parameters were compared between subgroups based on LARS score using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses. Fifty patients (37 men; median age 72·6 (range 44·4-87·7) years) underwent planar and SPECT scintigraphy. Overall, 17 patients had major and nine had minor LARS; 24 did not have LARS. There were significant differences in transit profiles between patients with major LARs and those without LARS: GCs were greater (median 5·94 (range 2·35-7·72) versus 4·30 (2·12-6·47) at 32 h; P = 0·015); the percentage retained isotope was lower (median 53·8 (range 6·5-100) versus 89·9 (38·4-100) per cent at 32 h; P = 0·002); GC velocity indices were greater (median 1·70 (range 1·18-1·92) versus 1·45 (0·98-1·80); P = 0·013); and T½ was shorter (median 38·3 (17·0-65·0) versus 57·0 (32·1-160·0) h; P = 0·003). Percentage tracer retained at 32 h best discriminated major LARS from no LARS (area under curve (AUC) 0·828). Patients with major LARS had accelerated colonic transit compared with those without LARS, which may help explain postoperative bowel dysfunction in this group. The percentage tracer retained at 32 h had the greatest AUC value in discriminating such patients.

Can the POLARS tool accurately predict low anterior resection syndrome in rectal cancer patients undergoing laparoscopic resection?

Radical rectal cancer resection can lead to a long-term bowel function impairment known as low anterior resection syndrome (LARS). It remains unclear how to determine which patients are at a higher risk of developing LARS post-surgery. The POLARS tool was designed to predict the onset and severity of LARS in rectal cancer patients after surgery. The study aimed to assess the accuracy of POLARS in predicting the onset of LARS. A total of 66 rectal cancer patients treated laparoscopically between January 2016 and December 2017 were included in this retrospective study. Using POLARS, the predictive value for the occurrence of LARS was documented. During an average 17-month follow-up period, the bowel function of the patients was assessed using the dedicated LARS questionnaire. The predicted and actual scores were then compared. Study participants included 36 women (54.5%) and 30 men (45.5%), with a mean age of 62.55 years (standard deviation: 10.2; range: 37-81). The mean predicted score according to POLARS was 24.5 (i.e. category "minor LARS"), and the mean actual score in the follow-up period was 16.42 ("no LARS" category). In only 39% of patients, the predicted LARS category was the same as the actual LARS category assessed by the questionnaire. Worse bowel function than reported at follow-up was predicted in 75% of all mispredictions. POLARS did not prove to be accurate in predicting the risk and severity of LARS in these patients, although the average numbers appear promising. Further evaluation of the POLARS tool using a larger cohort is needed.

Low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer after primary debulking surgery

ObjectiveTo evaluate the prevalence of low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) in patients with debulking surgery for primary advanced epithelial ovarian cancer and to identify potential risk factors for development of LARS. MethodsWe reviewed data on 552 consecutive patients with primary epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC), who underwent upfront or interval cytoreductive surgery including low anterior resection at two different academic institutions (Kliniken-Essen-Mitte, Germany, and Medical University of Vienna, Austria). Intestinal dysfunction was assessed by the validated LARS-questionnaire via telephone call. We performed descriptive statistics and a binary logistic regression model to evaluate risk factors for LARS. ResultsIn total, 341 patients were eligible and 206 (60.4%) were successfully contacted and provided complete information. Major LARS was observed in 78 (37.9%) patients, minor LARS in 44 (21.4%) patients, and no LARS in 84 (40.8%) patients. The prevalence rate of major LARS was not influenced by time interval between surgery and LARS assessment, type of cytoreductive surgery, and recurrent disease at the time of assessment. In multivariate analyses, number of anastomosis was independently associated with an increased risk for presence of major LARS (OR 3.76 [1.95–7.24]). In the present cohort, 25.2% patients had more than one bowel anastomosis. ConclusionsLARS in general and major LARS in particular seem to be a frequent long-term complication after debulking surgery including low anterior resection in primary advanced EOC patients. Particularly EOC patients with more than one bowel anastomosis during surgery seem to be at an increased risk for major LARS.

The burden of low anterior resection syndrome on quality of life in patients with mid or low rectal cancer.

Low anterior resection (LAR) with total mesorectal excision (TME) for mid and low rectal cancer is standard of care, reducing local recurrence and enhancing long-term survival. However, this surgery is associated with a constellation of major defecatory problems that are collectively referred to as low anterior resection syndrome (LARS). The aims of this study were to evaluate the frequency of LARS in patients who have undergone LAR and to assess the impact of LARS on long-term quality of life (QoL). This was a single-center prospective survey study on patients who underwent LAR and TME for low or mid rectal cancer between 2007 and 2015. LARS score and QLQ-C30 questionnaires were used to evaluate patient's bowel functions and quality of life, respectively. Associations between LARS and QoL were evaluated. Fifty-seven patients out of 65 eligible agreed to participate in the study. Forty-three (66%) patients returned complete questionnaires. Five patients (11.6%) had no LARS, 7 had minor LARS (16.3%), and 31 had major LARS (72.1%). In univariate analysis, BMI > 30kg/m2 was predictive of major LARS (p = 0.047). Major LARS did not impair global QoL (p = 0.75), function scores, or social scales, and was not associated with any of the symptom scores except for diarrhea (p = 0.02). LARS is a frequent occurrence after LAR and TME for rectal cancer (72.1%) and is more prevalent in morbidly obese patients. However, the occurrence of LARS does not appear to have a direct impact on QoL except for the occurrence of diarrhea.

Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) in patients (pts) with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) managed with a watch and wait (W&amp;W) approach after a clinical complete response to chemoradiotherapy (CRT).

e15173 Background: PROMs have not been adequately studied in LARC pts who are managed with W&amp;W after a clinical complete response to CRT. The objectives of this study were to evaluate: quality of life measures, bowel function, Fear of Cancer Recurrence (FCR) and survivors’ needs, in this population. Methods: Data were collected from the Flinders Medical Centre W&amp;W prospective database. Questionnaires including Self-Administered Comorbidity (SCQ), EORTC QLQ-C30 and -CR29, EQ-5D-5L, MSKCC Bowel Function Instrument (MBFI), Low Anterior Resection Syndrome (LARS) score, Fear of Cancer Recurrence Inventory-Short Form (FCRI-SF), Cancer Survivors’ Unmet Needs (CaSUN) and Response Efficacy Score (RES) were sent via mail to eligible pts according to a Tailored Design Method. Descriptive statistical analyses were conducted. Results: Of 40 eligible pts, 21 (52.5%) responded: 15 (71%) were male, median age at diagnosis was 66 years (34-81). 5 developed local re-growth (1 had local excision and 4 had ultra-low anterior resection). Median time from end of CRT to data collection was 39.8 months (6.0-77.5). The mean SCQ score was 5.7 (SD 5.5). Mean EQ-5D-5L utility score was 0.84 (SD 0.13), mean EQ-VAS score was 81.9 (SD 12.7) and mean EORTC QLQ global health status score was 76.2 (SD 19.2). The most common symptoms were fatigue (90%), pain (67%) and flatulence (67%). In pts without a re-growth (n = 16), the mean MBFI total score was 27.9 (SD 7.7); based on LARS score: 6 (38%) had no LARS, 5 (31%) had minor LARS and 5 (31%) had major LARS. Mean FCRI-SF score was 11.8 (SD 6.1), clinical level FCR was reported by 2 (9.5%) [cut-off 22] and 4 (19%) pts [cut-off 16]. 10 (47%) reported unmet needs: the most common area was Comprehensive Cancer Care n = 9 (42%). On RES, of 20 responders, 19 (95%) believed W&amp;W was a worthwhile and effective strategy. Conclusions: The most commonly reported symptoms included fatigue, pain and flatulence. LARS was common: in the absence of surgery, LARS is due to CRT. Clinical FCR was uncommon. The majority believed W&amp;W was worthwhile and effective. Larger comparative studies are needed in this group of pts.

What is the functional result of a delayed coloanal anastomosis in redo rectal surgery?

Delayed coloanal anastomosis (DCAA) may be used in patients with complex rectal conditions, such as chronic pelvic sepsis, low recto-vaginal and recto-vesical fistula; however, limited data are available. The aim is to report the morbidity and functional results of DCAA in redo rectal surgery. All patients undergoing DCAA between January 2014 and August 2017 were retrospectively included. Success was defined as a functional anastomosis without stoma, evaluated using the Low Anterior Resection Syndrome (LARS) score and the Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index (GIQLI) functional assessment tools. Of the 72 redo pelvic surgeries, 29 (40.3%) DCAA were performed over a 4-year period. Indications for redo resection were chronic pelvic sepsis (n = 13, 44.8%), recto-vaginal fistula (n = 11, 37.9%) and recto-vesical fistula (n = 5, 17.2%). Mean interval period between the two procedures was 14 ± 3 days (8-21). Global major morbidity (Clavien-Dindo III or IV) was seen in six patients (20.7%). Stoma closure was feasible for 22 (75.9%) patients after a median period of 78 days (interquartile range 61-98). The 6-month success rate was 79.3%. Mean LARS was 28.8 ± 10.2 (3-41) (minor LARS) for 18 patients with no stoma at the end of follow-up. LARS score was significantly better with a follow-up >2 years (23.3 ± 12.2 versus 32.3 ± 7.9), P = 0.074. Mean GIQLI score was 79.2 ± 14.3 (48-98). Transanal colonic pull through with delayed anastomosis for redo-surgery in complex pelvic situations had low morbidity and avoided a permanent stoma in three out of four patients with an acceptable quality of life.

Comparison of postoperative bowel function between patients undergoing transanal and laparoscopic total mesorectal excision

To compare the effects of transanal total mesorectal excision (taTME) and laparoscopic total mesorectal excision (laparoscopic TME) on patients' postoperative long-term bowel function. A retrospective cohort study was used in this study. We analyzed the clinical data of 134 patients with locally advanced mid-low rectal cancer, who underwent transanal TME or laparoscopic TME in the TaLaR randomized controlled trial at the Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University from April 2016 to November 2017. Inclusion criteria included age of 18 to 80 years old, distance from tumor low margin to anal edge ≤10 cm, preoperative staging of T1-3NxM0, and single rectal adenocarcinoma. Exclusion criteria included local recurrence, distant metastases, abdominoperineal resection, unreduced stoma, new stoma, less than 1 year after protectomy or stoma reduction, or preoperative poor anal function or incontinence. Patients were divided into taTME group and laparoscopic TME group. The taTME group received hybrid transanal and transabdominal approach performed simultaneously. The effects of surgical procedures on postoperative bowel function were evaluated with LARS (low anterior resection syndrome) scale, where 0-20 was defined as " no LARS" , 21-29 as " minor LARS" , and 30-42 as " major LARS" . Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to determine the risk factors associated with major LARS, with surgical approach as a pre-selected variate. A total of 107 patients were included. Of the 54 patients in the taTME group, 35 were male, median age was 57.2 (26.0-77.0) years old, and 22 cases had a tumor less than 5 cm from anal verge. Of the 53 patients in the laparoscopic TME group, 35 were male, median age was 62.0 (33.0-73.0) years old, and 25 cases had a tumor less than 5 cm from anal verge. All baseline clinical data including age, gender, preoperative staging, and tumor height were comparable between the two groups (all P>0.05). All operations in both groups were performed successfully. The operation time, intra-operative blood loss, postoperative anastomotic complication, postoperative hospital stay were comparable between the two groups (all P>0.05), except for a lower diverting stoma rate in the taTME group [37.0% (20/54) vs. 64.2% (34/53), χ²=7.866, P=0.005]. Of the 107 patients, 27 (25.2%) had no LARS, 32 (29.9%) had minor LARS, and 48 (44.9%) had major LARS, after a median follow-up of 17.2 (12.1-30.4) months. No significant difference was found between the two groups in overall bowel function [major LARS: 48.1% (26/54) vs. 41.5% (22/53), Z=-0.994, P=0.320]. Compared with the laparoscopic TME group, the taTME group experienced worse clustering of stools [68.5% (37/54) vs. 45.3% (24/53), Z=-2.354, P=0.019]. However, there were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of gas incontinence, liquid stool incontinence, frequency of defecation, and urgency (all P>0.05). Multivariate analysis identified preoperative radiotherapy (OR=5.073, 95% CI: 1.336 to 19.259, P=0.017) and anastomotic height (OR=3.633, 95% CI: 1.501 to 8.802, P=0.004) as independent risk factors for major LARS, but no impact of taTME on LARS (OR=1.442, 95% CI: 0.638 to 3.261, P=0.379). Compared with laparoscopic TME, taTME has similar outcomes of postoperative long-term bowel function. Preoperative radiotherapy and anastomotic height, but not surgical approach, are independent risk factors for postoperative bowel function.

A quest for sphincter-saving surgery in ultralow rectal tumours\u2014a single-centre cohort study

IntroductionDespite the progress in the treatment of colorectal cancer, there is still no optimal strategy for tumours located adjacent to the anal sphincter. This study aims to evaluate oncological and functional results of surgery for rectal cancer in unfavourable locations in proximity to anal sphincters.Materials and methodsPatients with rectal cancer, which was either initially infiltrating the anal sphincter or located in the close proximity of the sphincter, were included in the study. Patients were submitted to extralevator abdominoperineal resection (APR), intersphincteric resection, or transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME). Primary outcomes were perioperative data: operative time, blood loss, complications, length of stay (LOS), and 30-day mortality. Secondary outcomes were pathological quality of the specimens and functional outcome 6 months after defunctioning ileostomy closure.ResultsAmong patients with cancer adjacent to the anal sphincter, 13 (25%) underwent APR, 14 (27%) patients were submitted to intersphincteric resection, and 25 (48%) patients were treated with the TaTME approach. Operative time was 240 (210–270 IQR) for APR, 212.5 (170–260 IQR) for intersphincteric resection, and 270 (240–330 IQR) for TaTME (p = 0.018). Perioperative morbidity was 31% for APR, 36% for intersphincteric resections, and 12% for the TaTME group (p = 0.181). Complete mesorectal excision was achieved in 92% of specimens in the TaTME group, 93% in intersphincteric resections, and 78% in the APR group (p = 0.72). Median circumferential resection margin in APR was 6 mm (4–7 IQR), in intersphincteric resections 7.5 mm (2.5–10 IQR), and in the TaTME group 4 mm (2.8–8 IQR). All patients after intersphincteric resections developed major low anterior resection syndrome (LARS). Four patients in the TaTME group developed minor LARS, and 21 had major LARS.ConclusionSphincter-saving rectal resections are a feasible alternative to APR with good clinical, pathological, and oncological outcomes. Intersphincteric resections and TaTME seem to be equal in terms of clinicopathological results. The functional outcome is yet to be investigated.Trial registrationThe study was retrospectively registered in Thai Clinical Trials Registry (23-07-2018, ID TCTR20180724001).

Defunctioning ileostomy and mechanical bowel preparation may contribute to development of low anterior resection syndrome.

IntroductionLaparoscopic surgery is an approved technique in colorectal cancer treatment. Functional and quality-of-life studies have revealed significant changes in faecal continence.AimTo assess the incidence and risk factors of low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) in patients undergoing rectal resections for cancer.Material and methodsWe enrolled patients undergoing rectal resections in a general surgery department of a university hospital. The primary outcomes were the Jorge-Wexner scale and the LARS score 6 months after the end of treatment. The secondary outcomes were the risk factors for LARS development.ResultsFifty-six patients were included; 15 (26%) developed major LARS and 10 (18%) had minor LARS at 6 months. In univariate analysis the risk factors were: preoperative radiotherapy (p < 0.001, OR = 11.9, 95% CI: 2.98–47.48); shorter distance of the tumour from the anal verge (p = 0.001, OR = 0.69, 95% CI: 0.55–0.86); bowel preparation (p = 0.01, OR = 6.27, 95% CI: 1.51–26.07); low anterior rectal resection (p = 0.01, OR = 17.07, 95% CI: 1.86–156.83); and protective ileostomy (p = 0.001, OR = 15.97, 95% CI: 4.07–61.92). The risk factors for a higher Jorge-Wexner score in univariate analysis were greater diameter of tumour (p = 0.035), radiotherapy (p = 0.001), shorter distance from the anal verge (p = 0.002), bowel preparation (p = 0.042), low anterior rectal (LAR) (p = 0.01), ileostomy (p = 0.001), perioperative complications (p = 0.032), and readmission within 30 days (p = 0.034). In the multivariate analysis, readmissions and perioperative complications were significant.ConclusionsIn addition to typically described risk factors, two new ones have been identified. Mechanical bowel preparation and defunctioning ileostomy may also contribute to LARS development. However, due to the limitations of this study our observations require further confirmation in future trials.

Perioperative radiotherapy is an independent risk factor for major LARS: a cross-sectional observational study.

Sphincter-preserving surgery for rectal cancer is often associated with low anterior resection syndrome (LARS). The aim of our study was to determine the prevalence of LARS in our institution and identify possible risk factors for LARS. Furthermore, we evaluated which of the LARS symptoms was considered most disabling by patients and whether or not there is an adaptation of the LARS score over time. This study includes a prospective database of 100 patients who underwent total or partial mesorectal excision between January 2009 and September 2014. Patients were contacted after a median postoperative time of 38 (5-45) months to determine the LARS score and to identify LARS symptoms that were considered most disabling. Uni- and multivariate regression analysis was performed to identify risk factors for LARS and major LARS. Finally, the LARS score was evaluated over time after restoration of bowel continuity. Out of the 100 patients, 16 had minor LARS (score 21-29) and 51 patients had major LARS (score 30-42). Radiotherapy was an independent risk factor for major LARS (p = 0.04). For the majority of patients with major LARS (22%), fragmentation was considered the most disabling complaint. There was no correlation between interval after restoration of bowel continuity and the severity of the LARS score. Perioperative radiotherapy is an independent risk factor for major LARS. Fragmentation is considered the most disabling complaint in the majority of patients with major LARS. There is no significant adaptation of the LARS score over time.

Factors associated with low anterior resection syndrome after surgical treatment of rectal cancer.

To assess factors independently associated with low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) following resection or rectal cancer. Cross-sectional study carried out in two acute-care teaching hospitals in Barcelona, Spain. Patients who had undergone sphincter preserving low anterior resection with curative intent, with total or partial mesorectal excision (with and without protective ileostomy) between January 2001 and December 2009 completed a self-administered questionnaire to assess bowel dysfunction after rectal cancer surgery. Predictors of LARS were assessed by univariate and multivariate analyses. The questionnaire was sent to 329 patients (response rate 57.7%). Six cases of incomplete questionnaires were excluded. The study population included 184 patients (66.8% men) with a mean age of 63 years. There were 44 (23.9%) patients with no LARS, 36 (19.6%) with minor LARS and 104 (56.2%) with major LARS. In the univariate analysis, total mesorectal excision (P = 0.0008), protective ileostomy (P = 0.002), preoperative and postoperative radiotherapy (P = 0.0000), postoperative chemotherapy (P = 0.0046) and age (P = 0.035) were significantly associated with major LARS, whereas in the multivariate analysis, total mesorectal excision (odds ratio [OR] 2.18, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.02-4.65), preoperative radiotherapy (OR 4.33, 95% CI 2.03-9.27) and postoperative radiotherapy (OR 9.52, 95% CI 1.74-52.24) were independent risk factors for major LARS. In this study, the risk of having major LARS increases with total mesorectal excision and both neoadjuvant and adjuvant radiotherapy. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Functional outcome of low rectal resection evaluated by anorectal manometry.

Low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) covers disordered bowel function after rectal resection, leading to deterioration in patients' quality of life. The aim of this study was to evaluate anorectal function after laparoscopic low anterior resection (LAR) by means of standardized instruments. This was a prospective clinical cohort study conducted in a single institution to assess functional outcome of patients 1 year after laparoscopic LAR by means of LARS score and high-resolution anorectal manometry. In total, 65 patients were enrolled in the study. Mean tumour height was 9.4 ± 1.8 cm; total mesorectal excision during laparoscopic LAR with low end-to-end colorectal anastomosis was performed in all patients. One year after the surgery, minor LARS was detected in 33.9% of patients, major LARS in 36.9% of patients. Anorectal manometry revealed decreased resting pressure and normal squeeze pressure of the anal sphincters in the majority of our patients. Rectal compliance and rectal volume tolerability (first sensation, urge to defaecate and discomfort volume) were significantly reduced. The statistical testing of the correlation between LARS and manometry parameters showed that with increasing seriousness of LARS, values of some parameters (resting pressure, first sensation, urge to defaecate, discomfort volume and rectal compliance) were reduced. This study indicates that the majority of patients after laparoscopic LAR experience symptoms of minor or major LARS. These patients have decreased resting anal sphincter pressures, decreased rectal volume tolerability and decreased rectal compliance.