Hydrogen Bonds In Minor Groove Research Articles

Insights into protein-DNA interactions from hydrogen bond energy-based comparative protein-ligand analyses.

Hydrogen bonds play important roles in protein folding and protein–ligand interactions, particularly in specific protein–DNA recognition. However, the distributions of hydrogen bonds, especially hydrogen bond energy (HBE) in different types of protein–ligand complexes, is unknown. Here we performed a comparative analysis of hydrogen bonds among three non‐redundant datasets of protein–protein, protein–peptide, and protein–DNA complexes. Besides comparing the number of hydrogen bonds in terms of types and locations, we investigated the distributions of HBE. Our results indicate that while there is no significant difference of hydrogen bonds within protein chains among the three types of complexes, interfacial hydrogen bonds are significantly more prevalent in protein–DNA complexes. More importantly, the interfacial hydrogen bonds in protein–DNA complexes displayed a unique energy distribution of strong and weak hydrogen bonds whereas majority of the interfacial hydrogen bonds in protein–protein and protein–peptide complexes are of predominantly high strength with low energy. Moreover, there is a significant difference in the energy distributions of minor groove hydrogen bonds between protein–DNA complexes with different binding specificity. Highly specific protein–DNA complexes contain more strong hydrogen bonds in the minor groove than multi‐specific complexes, suggesting important role of minor groove in specific protein–DNA recognition. These results can help better understand protein–DNA interactions and have important implications in improving quality assessments of protein–DNA complex models.

Minor Groove Hydrogen Bonds and the Replication of Unnatural Base Pairs

As part of an effort to expand the genetic alphabet, we examined the synthesis of DNA with six different unnatural nucleotides bearing methoxy-derivatized nucleobase analogues. Different nucleobase substitution patterns were used to systematically alter the nucleobase electronics, sterics, and hydrogen-bonding potential. We determined the ability of the Klenow fragment of E. coli DNA polymerase I to synthesize and extend the different unnatural base pairs and mispairs under steady-state conditions. Unlike other hydrogen-bond acceptors examined in the past, the methoxy groups do not facilitate mispairing, implying that they are not recognized by any of the hydrogen-bond donors of the natural nucleobases; however, they do facilitate replication. The more efficient replication results largely from an increase in the rate of extension of primers terminating at the unnatural base pair and, interestingly, requires that the methoxy group be at the ortho position where it is positioned in the developing minor groove and can form a functionally important hydrogen bond with the polymerase. Thus, ortho methoxy groups should be generally useful for the effort to expand the genetic alphabet.

Yeast DNA polymerase eta makes functional contacts with the DNA minor groove only at the incoming nucleoside triphosphate.

DNA polymerase eta (Pol eta) functions in the proficient bypass of a variety of DNA lesions. Relative to the replicative polymerases, Pol eta has a greater tolerance for distorted DNA geometries and possesses a low fidelity. X-ray crystal structures and studies with nucleotide analogs have implicated interactions with the DNA minor groove as being crucial for the high fidelity of replicative DNA polymerases. To determine whether Pol eta also makes such functionally important contacts with the DNA minor groove, here we examine the effects on Pol eta-catalyzed nucleotide incorporation when 3-deazaguanine, a base analog that lacks the ability to form minor-groove hydrogen bonds with the protein, is substituted for guanine at various positions in the DNA. From these studies, we conclude that Pol eta makes only a single functional contact with the DNA minor groove at the position of the incoming nucleotide; in this regard, Pol eta differs from high-fidelity DNA polymerases that are unable to replicate through DNA lesions. These results help explain the proficient ability of Pol eta for bypassing distorting DNA lesions.

Functional hydrogen-bonding map of the minor groove binding tracks of six DNA polymerases.

Recent studies have identified amino acid side chains forming several hydrogen bonds in the DNA minor groove as potentially important in polymerase replication of DNA. Few studies have probed these interactions on the DNA itself. Using non-hydrogen-bonding nucleoside isosteres, we have now studied effects in both primer and template strands with several polymerases to investigate the general importance of these interactions. All six polymerases show differences in the H-bonding effects in the minor groove. Two broad classes of activity are seen, with a first group of DNA polymerases (KF(-), Taq, and HIV-RT) that efficiently extends nonpolar base pairs containing nucleoside Q (9-methyl-1H-imidazo[4,5-b]pyridine) but not the analogue Z (4-methylbenzimidazole), implicating a specific minor groove interaction at the first extension site. A second group of polymerases (Pol alpha, Pol beta, and T7(-)) fails to extend all non-H-bonding base pairs, indicating that these enzymes may need minor groove hydrogen bonds at both minor groove sites or that they are especially sensitive to noncanonical DNA structure or stability. All DNA polymerases examined use energetically important minor groove interactions to probe newly synthesized base pairs before extending them. The positions of these interactions vary among the enzymes, and only a subset of the interactions identified structurally appears to be functionally important. In addition, polymerases appear to be differently sensitive to small changes in base pair geometry.

Roles of Watson-Crick and minor groove hydrogen bonds in DNA replication.

Roles of Watson-Crick and minor groove hydrogen bonds in DNA replication.

C-H..O hydrogen bonds in minor groove of A-tracts in DNA double helices

Analysis of available B-DNA type oligomeric crystal structures as well as protein-bound DNA fragments (solved using data with resolution <2.6 Å) indicates that in both data sets, a majority of the (3′-Ade) H2..O2(3′-Thy/Cyt) distances in AA.TT and GA.TC dinucleotide steps, are considerably shorter than their values in a uniform fibre model, and are smaller than their optimum separation distance. Since the electropositive C2-H2 group of adenine is in close proximity of the electronegative keto oxygen atoms of both pyrimidine bases in the antiparallel strand of the double-helical DNA structures, it suggests the possibility of intra-base-pair as well as cross-strand C-H..O hydrogen bonds in the minor groove. The C2-H2..O2 hydrogen bonds within the A.T base-pairs could be a natural consequence of Watson-Crick pairing. However, the close cross-strand interactions between the bases at the 3′-ends of the AA.TT and GA.TC steps arise due to the local sequence-dependent geometry of these steps. While the base-pair propeller twist in these steps is comparable to the fibre model, some of the other local parameters such as base-pair opening angle and inter-base-pair slide show coordinated changes, leading to these shorter C2-H2..O2 distances. Hence, in addition to the well-known minor groove hydration, it appears that favourable C2-H2..O2 cross-strand interactions may play a role in imparting a characteristic geometry to AA.TT and GA.TC steps, as well as A n . T n and GA n . T n C tracts, which leads to a narrow minor groove in these regions.