With the growing global prevalence of open-pit mining activities, there is an increasing necessity for sustainable mine life cycle plans with an early outlook towards mine closure. A major consideration in mine closure planning is the potential formation of lakes in the mine void and how these “pit lakes” can be managed to minimise risks and, if possible, create benefits. Understanding the long-term interactions between pit lakes, groundwater, and surface water systems is essential for that purpose. While numerous site-specific studies have been undertaken, there have been no studies that aim to provide a general, broadly applicable understanding of how pit lake hydrology relates to geographical context, and no efforts to hydrologically classify pit lakes using geographical criteria. This research employs an integrated generic pit lake water balance model to examine mine pit lake interactions with the surrounding surface water and groundwater. Simulating 243 scenarios, the influence of five input factors (climate, hydraulic conductivity, regional groundwater level, catchment area and pit slope) on pit lake behaviour up to 6000 years beyond the closure of the mine was considered. The assessment focused on four pit lake hydrological attributes once the system reached equilibrium: water level, time to equilibrium, the fraction of days where the pit recharges groundwater, and the fraction of days where there is surface overflow from the lake. All scenarios were assigned to one of five hydrological classes based on the interactions between the pit lake and the surrounding surface water and groundwater. Our findings show that, in many contexts, general data on climate type and subsurface hydraulic conductivity can yield reliable predictions of a pit lake's long-term hydrological classification without having to develop a detailed, site-specific pit lake model. The classification needs improvements in non-arid climates where inter-annual variation in rainfall is pronounced. The pit lake classification is particularly valuable for first-pass risk assessments to determine whether site-specific modelling is required.
Read full abstract