Linezolid Minimum Inhibitory Concentration Research Articles

Correlation between oxacillin MIC values with those of linezolid against clinical isolates of MRSA

Infection by methicillin-resistant (MRSA) is a great threat to medical care facilities and also in communities, due to its multidrug resistance to commonly used antimicrobial agents. The overuse of glycopeptide antibiotics, such as vancomycin and linezolid, has led to the emergence of reduced susceptibility to these anti-MRSA agents, which in turn may lead to therapeutic failure. This study has been conducted to explore the correlation if any, of MIC of oxacillin to the MIC of linezolid in clinically significant isolates of MRSA in a tertiary care hospital.: The study was carried out over the period of two months after obtaining a waiver of consent from the Institute Ethics Committee. Seventy-five clinically significant MRSA isolates were included in the study. All MRSA isolates were subjected to cefoxitin and linezolid antibiotic disk susceptibility testing. Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) to oxacillin and linezolid was performed by the agar dilution method. The MIC and MIC were also recorded both for oxacillin and linezolid MIC among these MRSA isolates. Correlation between oxacillin MIC and linezolid MIC was estimated using the Pearson correlation coefficient, r.Themajority of MRSA isolates (41%) were isolated from skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs) (40%). MIC values for oxacillin ranged from 4 μg/mL to >32μg/mL and MIC values for linezolid ranged from ≤ 0.25µg/mL to 4 µg/mL. The majority of these isolates (40%) had linezolid MIC of ≤ 0.25µg/mL. All the isolates were uniformly susceptible to linezolid. Pearson correlation coefficient, r was 0.41, between oxacillin MICs and linezolid MICs, which indicated poor correlation. Although we did not observe any resistance to linezolid among the MRSA isolates, we should monitor carefully the antibiotic selection pressure and creeping MIC, to aid in the early detection of the emergence of resistance.

A Comparison of the Minimum Inhibitory Concentration of Antibiotics in Staphylococcus Species Isolated From Orthopedic and Respiratory Medicine Infections.

Antibiotic susceptibility is very important for the successful treatment of orthopedic infections, particularly for implant-related infections. While the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of Staphylococcus species were well investigated for the isolates from the respiratory tract, investigations for orthopedic pathogens are very limited. We investigated the antibiotic MIC values of Staphylococcus species isolated from orthopedic infections and compared them with those of respiratory medicine isolatesused as a control. The MICs of vancomycin (VCM), arbekacin (ABK), teicoplanin (TEIC), linezolid (LZD), and rifampicin (RFP) of a total of consecutive 259 (89 orthopedic and 170 respiratory) Staphylococcus speciesisolated in our laboratory from January 2013 to July 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. Differences between the MICs of each antibiotic in orthopedic and respiratory samples were determined. The number of methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) with a VCM MIC of <0.5 μg/mL among respiratory isolates was significantly higher than that among orthopedic isolates, while those with a MIC of 2 μg/mL were significantly lower (P = 0.0078). The proportion of methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative staphylococci (MRCNS) isolates with a VCM MIC of 2 μg/mL was significantly higher in orthopedic samples than that of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) (P < 0.001) in respiratory isolates. The proportion of MRCNS orthopedic isolates with an RFP MIC of >2 μg/mL was significantly higher (P = 0.0058) than that of other orthopedic staphylococci. The VCM MICs of Staphylococcus species from orthopedic infections were higher than those of respiratory samples, particularly MRCNS from implant-related samples.

Antibacterial and anti-biofilm activity of radezolid against Staphylococcus aureus clinical isolates from China.

Although the potent antibacterial ability of radezolid against Staphylococcus aureus has been widely reported worldwide, its antibacterial and anti-biofilm activity against the S. aureus clinical isolates from China remains elusive. In this study, the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of radezolid was determined in S. aureus clinical isolates from China using the agar dilution method, and the relationship between radezolid susceptibility and ST distribution was also investigated. The anti-biofilm activity of radezolid against S. aureus was determined by a crystal violet assay and compared with that of linezolid and contezolid. The quantitative proteomics of S. aureus treated with radezolid was analyzed, and the genetic mutations in radezolid-induced resistant S. aureus were determined by whole-genome sequencing. The dynamic changes in transcriptional expression levels of several biofilm-related genes were analyzed by quantitative RT-PCR. Our data showed that radezolid MIC ranged from ≤0.125 to 0.5 mg/L, which was almost 1/4 × MIC of linezolid against S. aureus, indicating the greater antibacterial activity of radezolid than linezolid. The S. aureus clinical isolates with radezolid MICs of 0.5 mg/L were most widely distributed in ST239 of MRSA and ST7 of MSSA. Moreover, the more robust anti-biofilm activity of radezolid with subinhibitory concentrations (1/8 × MIC and 1/16 × MIC) was demonstrated against S. aureus when compared with that of contezolid and linezolid. Genetic mutations were found in glmS, 23S rRNA, and DUF1542 domain-containing protein in radezolid-induced resistant S. aureus selected by in vitro induction of drug exposure. Quantitative proteomic analysis of S. aureus indicated that the global expression of some biofilm-related and virulence-related proteins was downregulated. Quantitative RT-PCR further confirmed that the expressions of some downregulated biofilm-related proteins, including sdrD, carA, sraP, hlgC, sasG, spa, sspP, fnbA, and oatA, were decreased after 12 h and 24 h of exposure to radezolid. Conclusively, radezolid shows robust antibacterial and anti-biofilm activity against S. aureus clinical isolates from China when compared with contezolid and linezolid.

High occurrence of Enterococcus faecalis, Enterococcus faecium, and Vagococcus lutrae harbouring oxazolidinone resistance genes in raw meat-based diets for companion animals - a public health issue, Switzerland, September 2018 to May 2020.

IntroductionEnterococci harbouring genes encoding resistance to florfenicol and the oxazolidinone antimicrobial linezolid have emerged among food-producing animals and meat thereof, but few studies have analysed their occurrence in raw meat-based diets (RMBDs) for pets.AimWe aimed to examine how far RMBDs may represent a source of bacteria with oxazolidinone resistance genes.MethodsFifty-nine samples of different types of RMBDs from 10 suppliers (three based in Germany, seven in Switzerland) were screened for florfenicol-resistant Gram-positive bacteria using a selective culture medium. Isolates were phenotypically and genotypically characterised.ResultsA total of 27 Enterococcus faecalis, Enterococcus faecium, and Vagococcus lutrae isolates were obtained from 24 of the 59 samples. The optrA, poxtA, and cfr genes were identified in 24/27, 6/27 and 5/27 isolates, respectively. Chloramphenicol and linezolid minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) ranged from 24.0 mg/L-256.0 mg/L, and 1.5 mg/L-8.0 mg/L, respectively. According to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) breakpoints, 26 of 27 isolates were resistant to chloramphenicol (MICs ≥ 32 mg/L), and two were resistant to linezolid (MICs ≥ 8 mg/L). Multilocus sequence typing analysis of the 17 E. faecalis isolates identified 10 different sequence types (ST)s, with ST593 (n = 4 isolates) and ST207 (n = 2 isolates) occurring more than once, and two novel STs (n = 2 isolates). E. faecium isolates belonged to four different STs (168, 264, 822, and 1846).ConclusionThe high occurrence in our sample of Gram-positive bacteria harbouring genes encoding resistance to the critical antimicrobial linezolid is of concern since such bacteria may spread from companion animals to humans upon close contact between pets and their owners.

Risk factors for mortality after linezolid treatment of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus bloodstream infection

ObjectivesWe analyzed the risk factors affecting linezolid treatment outcome in vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE) bloodstream infection (BSI). MethodsWe conducted a multicenter observational study of patients who received linezolid 600 mg every 12 hours for VRE BSI. The primary outcome was 28-day mortality. The estimated area under the concentration-time curve and trough concentration were calculated. Multivariable logistic regression was used for the outcome analysis. ResultsA total of 170 patients were included: 114 (67.1%) survived and 56 (32.9%) did not. A total of 26 (18.2%) isolates showed a linezolid minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of ≤1 mg/l, 113 (79.0%) of 2 mg/l, and 4 (2.8%) of 4 mg/l. The univariable analysis showed that the linezolid MIC and concentration-time curve/MIC were not associated with mortality (P = 0.95 and P = 0.42, respectively). After adjusting for underlying comorbidity and disease severity, the linezolid dose per body weight (LDBW), body height, and interaction between them were independent risks for mortality. Marginal analysis showed that increasing the LDBW was protective in patients with a body height <160 cm. A trough concentration of >12.2 mg/l was a risk factor for thrombocytopenia. ConclusionThe LDBW and body height were interactively associated with clinical outcomes of linezolid treatment for VRE BSI.

Prevalence and Genetic Analysis of Resistance Mechanisms of Linezolid-Nonsusceptible Enterococci in a Tertiary Care Hospital Examined via Whole-Genome Sequencing.

(1) Background: Linezolid plays an important role in the treatment of invasive infections caused by vancomycin-resistant enterococci after its introduction to clinical practice. However, a detailed examination of linezolid-nonsusceptible enterococci (LNSE) is required. In this study, we attempted to analyze the mechanisms of LNSE strains isolated from a tertiary care hospital. (2) Methods: From 2019 to 2020, 18 Enterococcus faecalis, 14 E. faecium, and 2 E. gallinarum clinical isolates were collected at Severance Hospital. Agar dilution was performed to evaluate precise linezolid minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs). Short-read whole-genome sequencing (WGS) was used to analyze resistance determinants. (3) Results: The presence of the optrA gene was likely the primary resistance mechanism in these three species, typically demonstrating a MIC value of 8 μg/mL. The co-existence of the cfr(D) and poxtA2 gene was the second major mechanism, primarily predicting a phenotype showing intermediate susceptibility to linezolid. G2576U mutation on 23S rRNA was only found in E. faecium; it mediated the most significant increase in linezolid MIC. (4) Conclusion: This is the first report examining poxtA2-cfr(D) co-harboring clinical enterococcal isolates in Korea and demonstrating the poxtA EF9F6-harboring clinical E. gallinarum strain worldwide. The comparison with resistance-gene-containing fragments in the isolates obtained from different countries and different sources demonstrated the spread of linezolid-resistance genes and suggested the possibility of foodborne transmission.

Coagulase-negative staphylococci isolates from blood cultures of newborns in a tertiary hospital in southern Brazil

Neonatal sepsis continues to be a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS), commonly found on the skin, being the main agents isolated. The aim of this study was to evaluate CoNS isolated from blood cultures of newborn (NB) infants. The study took place between 2014 and 2016/2017 in a tertiary hospital in southern Brazil. Using the VITEK 2 system (bioMérieux, Marcy l'Etoile, France), the microorganisms were identified and had their sensitivity profiles determined. The minimum inhibitory concentrations of linezolid, tigecycline, and vancomycin were also determined. The clinical parameters and mortality rates of NBs were evaluated. From January to December 2014, 176 CoNS isolates were obtained from 131 patients and from June 2016 to July 2017, 120 CoNS isolates were obtained from 79 patients. Staphylococcus epidermidis was most prevalent in both periods. Resistance rates increased between 2014 and 2016/2017, especially against ciprofloxacin (52.27% and 73.11%, p = 0.0004), erythromycin (51.40% and 68.07%, p = 0.0054), gentamicin (50.59% and 67.23%, p = 0.0052), and penicillin (71.3% and 99.17%, p = 0.0001), respectively. With 100% susceptibility to linezolid, tigecycline, and vancomycin in both periods and methodologies tested. In 2014, 53.44% of the NBs received antibiotic therapy, and of these, 77.14% used a catheter; in 2016/2017, these were 78.48% and 95.16%, respectively. Regarding laboratory tests, a hemogram was ineffective, since patients with sepsis presented normal reference values. In 2014 and 2016/17, 15.71% and 17.74% of the NBs died, respectively. S. epidermidis was the predominant microorganism, related to catheter use in most cases. The resistance rates have increased over time, demonstrating the importance of adopting control and prevention measures in this hospital. CoNS are responsible for a significant neonatal sepsis mortality rate in infants.

In Vitro Activity of Vancomycin, Teicoplanin, Linezolid and Daptomycin Against Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Isolates Collected from Chinese Hospitals in 2018-2020.

IntroductionVancomycin, teicoplanin, linezolid and daptomycin are four major antibacterials used for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infection treatment. However, with the increasing failure of clinical MRSA anti-infective treatment, it is urgent to investigate the status of MRSA sensitivity to these four drugs.MethodsIn the present study, 407 non-duplicated MRSA isolates from 6 provinces in China were collected from January 2018 to August 2020. The minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of vancomycin, teicoplanin, linezolid and daptomycin were determined by broth microdilution method, and their MIC50, MIC90, and geometric mean MIC were calculated.ResultsAll 407 MRSA strains were sensitive to these four antibacterials. MIC range of vancomycin, teicoplanin, linezolid and daptomycin was 0.25 to 2 mg/L, 0.125 to 4 mg/L, 0.25 to 4 mg/L and 0.06 to 1 mg/L, respectively. Between 2018 and 2020, there was no “MIC creep” in vancomycin, teicoplanin and daptomycin. The geometric mean MIC of linezolid was not increased, but both MIC50 and MIC90 in 2019 and 2020 MRSA isolates were higher than 2018 isolates.ConclusionAll MRSA isolates remained sensitivity to vancomycin, teicoplanin, linezolid and daptomycin. The linezolid MIC50 and MIC90 increased have been found in this study.

Linezolid resistance among multidrug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis clinical isolates in Iran.

The management of multidrug-resistant (MDR) and extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis (XDR-TB) presents a main challenge and the drug options for treating these infections are very limited. Linezolid (LNZ) has recently been approved for the treatment of MDR and XDR-TB. But, there are narrow data on genotypic and phenotypic LNZ resistance in clinical isolates. So, we aimed to determine the prevalence of LNZ resistance and to identify the mutations associated with LNZ resistance among clinical MDR-TB isolates. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values of LNZ for 22 MDR-TB isolates were determined by broth microdilution method. All MDR-TB isolates were sequenced in the rrl and rplC genes conferring LNZ resistance. LNZ resistance was found in 3 (13.6%) of 22 MDR-TB isolates. The MICs of LNZ were 8 μg/mL for two isolates and 16 μg/mL for one isolate. The 421 (A/G) and 449 (T/A) mutations in rplC gene were detected in one of the LNZ-resistant isolates. There was no mutation in rrl gene. The results reveal that the prevalence of LNZ-resistant isolates is 13.6% among MDR-TB isolates and drug susceptibility testing (DST) against LNZ is useful in the management of complicated and drug-resistant cases. However, further studies could identify other possible genetic mechanism of resistance in TB.

Characterization of oxazolidinone and phenicol resistance genes in non-clinical enterococcal isolates from Korea

ObjectivesTo investigate the distribution and genetic characteristics of linezolid-resistant enterococci. MethodsEnterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium strains were isolated from pigs, equipment, grounds, and employees of 19 Korean swine farms in 2017. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was then performed and linezolid resistance genes were detected via PCR. For genetic epidemiological characterization, multilocus sequence typing and whole-genome sequencing data were analysed. ResultsTwenty-eightE. faecalis and five E. faecium strains were isolated from 1026 samples obtained from the 19 farms. Ten sequence types were identified among the E. faecalis strains, of which ST256 (42.9%) and ST86 (25%) were the most abundant. The oxazolidinone and phenicol resistance genes poxtA, optrA, and fexA were detected in isolates of E. faecalis (100%, 85.7%, and 67.9%, respectively) and E. faecium (100%, 60%, and 80%, respectively). The minimum inhibitory concentrations of linezolid in these isolates ranged from 2 mg/L to 12 mg/L. The whole-genome sequencing data indicated that fexA was located upstream of poxtA. ConclusionsThis is the first study to report the detection of poxtA in isolates that were both susceptible and resistant to linezolid in Korea. These results demonstrate the importance of antimicrobial resistance monitoring programmes, including regular antimicrobial susceptibility testing and resistance gene expression analysis, to facilitate the control of the spread of antibiotic resistance in non-clinical settings in Korea.

Dynamic Changes of Staphylococcus aureus Susceptibility to Vancomycin, Teicoplanin, and Linezolid in a Central Teaching Hospital in Shanghai, China, 2008-2018.

Vancomycin, teicoplanin, and linezolid are the major treatment options for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). The phenomenon of progressive increase in the value of vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) for S. aureus (i.e., vancomycin MIC “creep”), has been reported; however, it is still a controversial concept because the results of research remain inconclusive. In this study, we conducted a retrospective epidemiologic investigation for more than 10 years to elucidate the dynamic changes of the MICs of vancomycin, teicoplanin, and linezolid in S. aureus in a central teaching hospital in Shanghai, China. A total of 2911 S. aureus isolates was recovered from 2008 to 2018, to which the MICs of three antimicrobials were tested by the E-test method and subsequently correlated with the characteristics of oxacillin susceptibility, clonotypes, and antimicrobial consumption during the study period. The proportion of MRSA dramatically decreased from 2008 to 2018 (from 84 to 49%, p < 0.001). Vancomycin MIC decline was identified both in MRSA and methicillin-sensitive S. aureus (MSSA) (both with p < 0.001), and both the dominating MRSA clone ST5 and pre-dominating MRSA clone ST239 displayed vancomycin MIC decline (p < 0.001, p = 0.040), while teicoplanin MIC decline was only identified in MRSA (p = 0.037). Linezolid MIC creep was identified in total S. aureus (p < 0.001), but linezolid in MRSA as well as teicoplanin and linezolid in MSSA displayed no statistically distinct trends of MIC creep or decline. Clinical consumption of linezolid increased significantly from 2012 to 2018 (p = 0.003), which correlated with vancomycin MIC decline in S. aureus (p = 0.005). The results of this study clearly demonstrate the dynamic changes of the MICs of these three primary antimicrobials in S. aureus, and suggest that changes in clinical antibiotic use may affect bacterial resistance.

First Draft Genome Sequence of Linezolid and Rifampicin Resistant &lt;i&gt;Staphylococcus haemolyticus &lt;/i&gt;

Linezolid resistance has increasingly been described in coagulase negative staphylococci (CoNS) in recent years. Here, we describe the molecular mechanism of linezolid resistance in Staphylococcus haemolyticus using whole genome sequencing. Three S. haemolyticus isolates (VB5326, VB19458, and VB840) carried G2576T mutation at the domain V of the 23S rRNA. In addition, VB5326 and VB19458 carried the cfr gene in the chromosome. The presence of cfr gene, in combination with G2576T mutation in 23S rRNA, resulted in a high linezolid Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of > 256 µg/ml. Three mutations, including D471E, I527M, and S532N, in rpoB contributed to an increased rifampicin MIC of 32 µg/ml. Subsequent development of linezolid and rifampicin resistance in S. haemolyticus is worrisome and greatly limits clinical management.

Radezolid Is More Effective Than Linezolid Against Planktonic Cells and Inhibits Enterococcus faecalis Biofilm Formation.

The aim of this study was to compare the effects of radezolid and linezolid on planktonic and biofilm cells of Enterococcus faecalis. A total of 302 E. faecalis clinical isolates were collected, and the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of radezolid and linezolid were determined by the agar dilution method. Changes in the transcriptome of a high-level, in vitro-induced linezolid-resistant isolate were assessed by RNA sequencing and RT-qPCR, and the roles of efflux pump-related genes were confirmed by overexpression analysis. Biofilm biomass was evaluated by crystal violet staining and the adherent cells in the biofilms were quantified according to CFU numbers. The MIC50/MIC90 values of radezolid (0.25/0.50 mg/L) against the 302 E. faecalis clinical isolates were eightfold lower than those of linezolid (2/4 mg/L). The radezolid MICs against the high-level linezolid-resistant isolates (linezolid MICs ≥ 64 mg/L) increased to ≥ 4 mg/L with mutations in the four copies of the V domain of the 23S rRNA gene. The mRNA expression level of OG1RF_12220 (mdlB2, multidrug ABC superfamily ATP-binding cassette transporter) increased in the high-level linezolid-resistant isolates, and radezolid and linezolid MICs against the linezolid-sensitive isolate increased with overexpression of OG1RF_12220. Radezolid (at 1/4 or 1/8× the MIC) inhibited E. faecalis biofilm formation to a greater extent than linezolid, which was primarily achieved through the inhibition of ahrC, esp, relA, and relQ transcription in E. faecalis. In conclusion, radezolid is more effective than linezolid against planktonic E. faecalis cells and inhibits biofilm formation by this bacterium.

Pharmacodynamic comparison of different antimicrobial regimens against Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infections with elevated vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentration

BackgroundStaphylococcus aureus is one of the major causes of bloodstream infections (BSI) worldwide, representing a major challenge for public health due to its resistance profile. Higher vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) in S. aureus are associated with treatment failure and defining optimal empiric options for BSIs in settings where these isolates are prevalent is rather challenging. In silico pharmacodynamic models based on stochastic simulations (Monte Carlo) are important tools to estimate best antimicrobial regimens in different scenarios. We aimed to compare the pharmacodynamic profiles of different antimicrobials regimens for the treatment of S. aureus BSI in an environment with high vancomycin MIC.MethodsSteady-state drug area under the curve ratio to MIC (AUC/MIC) or the percent time above MIC (fT > MIC) were modeled using a 5000-patient Monte Carlo simulation to achieve pharmacodynamic exposures against 110 consecutive S. aureus isolates associated with BSI.ResultsCumulative fractions of response (CFRs) against all S. aureus isolates were 98% for ceftaroline; 79% and 92% for daptomycin 6 mg/kg q24h and for the high dose of 10 mg/kg q24h, respectively; 77% for linezolid 600 mg q12h when MIC was read according to CLSI M100-S26 instructions, and 64% when MIC was considered at the total growth inhibition; 65% and 86% for teicoplanin, three loading doses of 400 mg q12 h followed by 400 mg q24 h and for teicoplanin 400 mg q12 h, respectively; 61% and 76% for vancomycin 1000 mg q12 h and q8 h, respectively.ConclusionsBased on this model, ceftaroline and high-dose daptomycin regimens delivered best pharmacodynamic exposures against S. aureus BSIs. Teicoplanin higher dose regimen achieved the best CFR (86%) among glycopeptides, although optimal threshold was not achieved, and vancomycin performance was critically affected by the S. aureus vancomycin MIC ≥2 mg/L. Linezolid effectiveness (CFR of 73%) is also affected by high prevalence of isolates with linezolid MIC ≥2 mg/L. These data show the need to continually evaluate the pharmacodynamic profiles of antimicrobials for empiric treatment of these infections.

Linezolid Resistance in Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Korea: High Rate of False Resistance to Linezolid by the VITEK 2 System.

As various linezolid resistance mechanisms have been identified in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), we investigated the molecular characteristics of MRSA with elevated linezolid minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs), using the VITEK 2 system (bioMérieux, Marcy-l'Étoile, France). Twenty-seven MRSA isolates from 14 patients exhibiting linezolid MICs ≥8 µg/mL were examined by broth microdilution (BMD) test as well as by sequencing for mutations in the 23S rRNA gene or ribosomal proteins (L3, L4, and L22) and the presence of the optrA, cfr, and cfr(B) genes. Of the 27 isolates, four (14.8%) from one patient were confirmed as linezolid resistant by BMD and harbored a 23S rRNA T2500A mutation. The remaining 23 were confirmed as linezolid susceptible, indicating that the linezolid-resistant results were major errors generated by VITEK 2. The most commonly detected mutation (19/27, 70.4%), L3 Gly152Asp, was detected in only linezolid-susceptible isolates. No isolates contained optrA, cfr, or cfr(B) or any L4 or L22 protein alterations. Our results show that the 23S rRNA T2500A mutation was mainly associated with linezolid resistance, while the L3 Gly152Asp mutation was not related to linezolid resistance. A confirmatory test is recommended for VITEK 2 linezolid-resistant results owing to the high probability of false resistant results.

Comparative in vitro potency and kill curve activity of tedizolid and linezolid against Gram-positive bacteria isolated from Chinese hospitalized patients in 2013–2016

We compared the kill-curve activity of tedizolid and linezolid at clinically relevant (total or free plasma, lung) concentrations against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae (PRSP) isolated from Chinese patients. Tedizolid had greater in vitro potency than linezolid against staphylococci, streptococci and enterococci species (tedizolid minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) range: ≤ 0.016–0.5 µg/mL; linezolid MIC range: 0.25–2 µg/mL). In kill-curve experiments, growth of MRSA was inhibited at tedizolid concentration of 0.6 µg/mL (i.e. 4.8 × MIC; MIC = 0.125 µg/mL) and linezolid concentration of 2 µg/mL (2× MIC; MIC = 1 µg/mL). Against PRSP, tedizolid at a concentration of 0.25 µg/mL (representing its MIC) was bacteriostatic, but exerted a bactericidal effect at higher concentrations. Results were similar for linezolid, however, even at 21 µg/mL, a small proportion of organisms survived beyond 24 h. The results demonstrated the potency of tedizolid against clinical strains of Gram-positive pathogens supporting its use as a suitable alternative to linezolid in Chinese patients.

Ameliorative effect of silymarin against linezolid-induced hepatotoxicity in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infected Wistar rats.

Linezolid has a better choice for eradication of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections, but its use is limited because of linezolid-induced hepatotoxicity, myelosuppression, and lactic acidosis. This research elucidated the role of silymarin against hepatoxicity of linezolid therapy in MRSA infected Wistar rats. The rats were rendered neutropenic by an intraperitoneal injection of cyclophosphamide injection. The neutropenic rats were injected subcutaneously with 106 CFU/ml of MRSA. The rats were divided into 6 groups. Normal control, Infected, Infected animals treated with linezolid 50 mg/kg/twice/day and Infected animals treated with linezolid and different dose of silymarin 25, 50, and 100 mg/kg/twice/day for 14 days. On the 15th day, the blood, liver, kidney, and bone marrow were collected for biochemical and histopathological examination. The MRSA was confirmed by PCR assay. The minimum inhibitory concentration of linezolid was 0.5-2 μg/ml. The linezolid induced liver damage was confirmed by elevation of marker enzymes alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels, serum bilirubin, lactate, and histopathological studies of the liver. The linezolid treated rats also showed myelosuppression, lactic acidosis, oxidative stress and decreased intestinal alkaline phosphatase (IAP). The silymarin administration exhibited marked hepatoprotective effect by significantly lowering the liver marker enzymes, serum parameters, and cytological findings reflect the hepatoprotection. Additionally, Silymarin showed protection against myelosuppression and lactic acidosis evidenced by bone marrow smear and serum lactate estimation. Antioxidant effect of silymarin was confirmed by decreased levels of lipid peroxidation, restored the enzymatic and non-enzymatic antioxidants of the liver nearer to normal. The present study indicates that the silymarin could be a better herbal therapeutic agent which protects against the linezolid induced hepatotoxicity in MRSA infected rats.

Risk factors associated with MRSA

Background: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infection is associated with increased morbidity and mortality compared with infections caused by methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA). Treatment of MRSA infection is complicated by the fact that these organisms are resistant to multiple antimicrobial agents, so treatment options are limited. The aim of the present study is determine risk factors association with MRSA as compared with MSSA and to compare the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of vancomycin, teicoplanin, linezolid and erythromycin to MRSA and MSSA.Methods: A nine-month prospective study was carried out. Staphylococcus aureus strains with clinical correlation, isolated from hospitalised patients, were included in the study. MIC of vancomycin, teicoplanin, linezolid and erythromycin was determined by E-test (HIMEDIA). Risk factors such as immunosuppression, previous hospitalisation, surgical procedure done, invasive devices and antibiotic therapy were determined by a pre-set protocol.Results: A total of 62 S. aureus strains were included in the study. Some 40% of S. aureus strains were methicillin resistant. The risk factors, invasive devices, previous hospitalisation and comorbid illness were found to be significantly associated with MRSA. Borderline significant association was observed with immunosuppression and antibiotic therapy. Erythromycin resistance was observed in 56% of MRSA, while no resistance was observed in MSSA. Teicoplanin MIC50 values and mean MIC were found to be lowest in vitro among vancomycin and linezolid against both MRSA and MSSA. The efficacy of teicoplanin, in terms of clinical and microbiological cure, has not been proven to be superior to vancomycin, but it has a better toxicity profile and has demonstrated a reduced risk of adverse events. Conclusions: Minimising risk factors and attention to alternative antibiotics and infection control practices may ease the problem of management of infections with MRSA.

Erratum: Delamanid, Bedaquiline, and Linezolid Minimum Inhibitory Concentration Distributions and Resistance-related Gene Mutations in Multidrug-resistant and Extensively Drug-resistant Tuberculosis in Korea

This corrects the article on p. 563 in vol. 38, PMID: 30027700.

Delamanid, Bedaquiline, and Linezolid Minimum Inhibitory Concentration Distributions and Resistance-related Gene Mutations in Multidrug-resistant and Extensively Drug-resistant Tuberculosis in Korea.

BackgroundDelamanid, bedaquiline, and linezolid have recently been approved for the treatment of multidrug- and extensively drug-resistant (MDR and XDR, respectively) tuberculosis (TB). To use these drugs effectively, drug susceptibility tests, including rapid molecular techniques, are required for accurate diagnosis and treatment. Furthermore, mutation analyses are needed to assess the potential for resistance. We evaluated the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of these three anti-TB drugs for Korean MDR and XDR clinical strains and mutations in genes related to resistance to these drugs.MethodsMICs were determined for delamanid, bedaquiline, and linezolid using a microdilution method. The PCR products of drug resistance-related genes from 420 clinical Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains were sequenced and aligned to those of M. tuberculosis H37Rv.ResultsThe overall MICs for delamanid, bedaquiline, and linezolid ranged from ≤0.025 to >1.6 mg/L, ≤0.0312 to >4 mg/L, and ≤0.125 to 1 mg/L, respectively. Numerous mutations were found in drug-susceptible and -resistant strains. We did not detect specific mutations associated with resistance to bedaquiline and linezolid. However, the Gly81Ser and Gly81Asp mutations were associated with resistance to delamanid.ConclusionsWe determined the MICs of three anti-TB drugs for Korean MDR and XDR strains and identified various mutations in resistance-related genes. Further studies are needed to determine the genetic mechanisms underlying resistance to these drugs.