Minimally Invasive Surgery Group Research Articles

Feasibility of laparoscopic/robot-assisted surgery for Borrmann type 4 gastric cancer: a comparison study with conventional open surgery.

Laparoscopic surgery for early gastric cancer is regarded as a standard of care because of robust evidences obtained by several phase-III trials. Furthermore, the efficacy of laparoscopic radical surgery for advanced gastric cancer has been also reported. Meanwhile, the feasibility of laparoscopic surgery for Bormann type 4 gastric cancer, special type with unfavorable prognosis, remains unclear since excluded from eligibility of these trials. This study included 100 patients with type 4 gastric cancer who underwent laparoscopic/robot-assisted (minimally invasive surgery (MIS) group; n = 32) or open (Open group; n = 68) curative surgery between 2008 and 2021. After propensity score matching, 30 patients in each group were extracted for analysis. Clinical data, including surgical and midterm survival outcomes, were retrospectively compared between the two groups. Incidences of postoperative complication (≥ Clavien-Dindo grade III) were recorded in 23.3% in the MIS group and 13.3% in the Open group, but no statistical significance was demonstrated (P = 0.50). The 3-year overall survival rate in the MIS group was better than that in the Open group (80.2% vs. 53.5%, log-rank, P = 0.03). The trend of recurrence site was similar. Multivariate analysis showed that adjuvant chemotherapy was an independent favorable prognostic factor (hazard ratio, 0.33, 95% confidence interval 0.11-0.93) for overall survival. MIS was indicated as a favorable prognostic factor (hazard ratio, 0.39, 95% confidence interval 0.39-1.07), but without statistical difference. While multidisciplinary treatment is mainstay of treatment because of the poor prognosis of this disease, minimally invasive surgery may play an important role in treatment if appropriate patient selection is done. Further analyses with larger sample size are necessary to reach a final conclusion regarding oncological efficacy.

Comparison of Open Surgery versus Minimally Invasive Surgery in Non-severe Adult Degenerative Scoliosis: A Systematic Review and Meta Analysis.

A systematic review and meta-analysis. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) and open surgery in correcting ADS. Adult degenerative scoliosis (ADS) is a scoliosis secondary to degenerative changes in the intervertebral discs and facet joints in adults. Severe low back pain, radicular pain, and intermittent claudication are often present and require surgical treatment. PubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library, China national knowledge infrastructure (CNKI) Database, Wanfang Data, Weipu Database, and China Biomedical Document Service System (CBM) were systematically searched for studies that focused on the clinical efficacy of minimally invasive surgery and open surgery to correct ADS. This meta-analysis included 11 studies, involving 1527 patients (581 in the MIS group and 946 in the open surgery group). Regarding surgery and outcome indicators, the operative time in the open surgery group was shorter, the MIS group had less intraoperative blood loss, shorter hospitalization time, and lower incidence of serious postoperative complications. In terms of imaging parameters, although there was no significant difference in Cobb angle improvement and sagittal balance, the open surgery group exhibited better lumbar lordosis improvement and pelvic tilt improvement. In terms of clinical scores, including changes in the ODI index and VAS scores for low back and leg pain, similar improvements were appreciated across both groups. In mild to moderate ADS, we found that the advantages of open surgery include greater improvement in lumbar lordosis and pelvic tilt angle and shorter operative time. The advantages of minimally invasive surgery are less intraoperative blood loss, shorter hospital stay, and fewer serious postoperative complications. There is no significant difference between the two surgical methods in terms of Cobb angle, clinical pain and SVA improvement.

Minimally Invasive vs Open Approach for First Metatarsophalangeal Joint Arthrodesis: Short Report of Early Results.

We aim to compare early surgical results between groups who underwent minimally invasive surgery (MIS) vs open first metatarsophalangeal (MTP) arthrodesis to treat end-stage hallux rigidus. We conducted a retrospective cohort review of 65 patients who underwent a first MTP fusion procedure at an academic medical center between 2015 and 2023. Success of fusion was determined radiographically. Postoperative complications were identified through medical record review. Sixty-seven first MTP fusion surgeries (41 open and 26 MIS) were performed on 65 patients with a primary diagnosis of hallux rigidus. Open surgery and MIS groups had similarly high fusion rates: 95% (39/41) and 96% (25/26), respectively (P = .84). We identified no difference in overall complication rates: 20% for open surgery and 23% for MIS (P = .73). This retrospective analysis of 67 first MTP arthrodesis procedures showed no significant differences in fusion success or complications in the short term when comparing MIS to open surgery. Further studies are needed to elucidate potential differences between MIS vs open surgery. Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Changing patterns and surgical outcomes of small bowel obstruction in the era of minimally invasive surgery for colorectal cancer.

This study aimed to investigate whether the incidence, patterns, and surgical outcomes of small bowel obstruction (SBO) have changed in the era of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for primary colorectal cancer (CRC). Consecutive patients who underwent laparotomy for SBO were divided into MIS and traditional open surgery (TOS) groups based on the previous colorectal cancer operation technique used. The MIS group was selected from 1544 consecutive patients who underwent MIS as a treatment for primary CRCs between 2014 and 2022, while the TOS group was selected from 1604 consecutive patients who underwent TOS as a treatment for primary CRCs between 2004 and 2013. The demographics, clinicopathological features, and surgical outcomes were compared between the two groups. The SBO incidence in patients who underwent MIS for primary CRC was significantly lower than that in patients who underwent TOS (4.4%, n =68/1544 vs. 9.7%, n =156/1604, P <0.0001). Compared with the TOS group, the MIS group had significantly different ( P <0.0001) SBO patterns: adhesion (48.5 vs. 91.7%), internal herniation (23.5 vs. 2.6%), external herniation (11.8 vs. 1.9%), twisted bowel limbs (4.4 vs. 0.6%), ileal volvulus with pelvic floor adhesion (5.9 vs. 1.9%), and nonspecific external compression (5.9 vs. 1.3%). A subset analysis of patients with adhesive SBO (ASBO) showed that the MIS group tended to ( P <0.0001) have bands or simple adhesions (75.8%), whereas the TOS group predominantly had matted-type adhesions (59.4%). Furthermore, SBO in the MIS group had an acute (<3 months) or early (3-12 months) onset (64.7%), while that in the TOS group ( P <0.0001) had an intermediate or a late onset. When the surgical outcomes of SBO were evaluated, the TOS group had significantly more ( P <0.0001) blood loss and longer operation time; however, no significant difference was observed in the surgical morbidity/mortality (Clavien-Dindo classification ≧3, 11.8 vs. 14.1%, P =0.6367), hospitalization, and readmission rates between the two groups. Postoperative follow-up showed that the estimated 3-year (11.37 vs. 18.8%) and 6-year (25.54 vs. 67.4%) recurrence rates of SBO were significantly lower ( P =0.016) in the MIS group than in the TOS group. The wide adoption of MIS to treat primary CRC has led to a lower incidence, altered patterns, and reduced recurrence rates of SBO. Awareness of this new trend will help develop surgical techniques to prevent incomplete restoration of anatomical defects and bowel malalignments specifically associated with MIS for CRC, as well as facilitate timely and appropriate management of SBO complications whenever they occur.

Short-term results in a population based study indicate advantage for minimally invasive rectal cancer surgery versus open

BackgroundThe aim of this study was to determine if minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for rectal cancer is non-inferior to open surgery (OPEN) regarding adequacy of cancer resection in a population based setting.MethodsAll 9,464 patients diagnosed with rectal cancer 2012–2018 who underwent curative surgery were included from the Swedish Colorectal Cancer Registry. Primary outcomes: Positive circumferential resection margin (CRM < 1 mm) and positive resection margin (R1). Non-inferiority margins used were 2.4% and 4%. Secondary outcomes: 30- and 90-day mortality, clinical anastomotic leak, re-operation < 30 days, 30- and 90-day re-admission, length of stay (LOS), distal resection margin < 1 mm and < 12 resected lymph nodes. Analyses were performed by intention-to-treat using unweighted and weighted multiple regression analyses.ResultsThe CRM was positive in 3.8% of the MIS group and 5.4% of the OPEN group, risk difference -1.6% (95% CI -1.623, -1.622). R1 was recorded in 2.8% of patients in the MIS group and in 4.4% of patients in the OPEN group, risk difference -1.6% (95% CI -1.649, -1.633). There were no differences between the groups in adjusted unweighted and weighted analyses. All analyses demonstrated decreased mortality and re-admissions at 30 and 90 days as well as shorter LOS following MIS.ConclusionsIn this population based setting MIS for rectal cancer was non-inferior to OPEN regarding adequacy of cancer resection with favorable short-term outcomes.

Outcomes following minimally invasive approaches vs. open extended lobectomy for non-small cell lung cancer: a propensity-matched analysis of the National Cancer Database.

Traditional thoracotomy, an invasive surgical procedure, has been the standard approach for extended lobectomy in treating non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, minimally invasive surgery (MIS) has gained traction with advancements in surgical techniques. Despite this, the outcomes of extended lobectomy via a minimally invasive approach remain largely uncharted. Using the comprehensive National Cancer Database (NCDB), our research aimed to clarify the safety, feasibility, and efficacy of minimally invasive extended lobectomy in patients diagnosed with NSCLC. Our study encompassed a selection of patients with NSCLC who underwent extended lobectomy (defined as lobectomy or bilobectomy with chest wall, diaphragm or pericardial resection) between 2010 and 2014. Through propensity score matching (PSM), we ensured a balanced comparison between patients who underwent MIS and those who opted for the traditional open extended lobectomy. Both univariate and multivariate analyses were employed to discern whether the surgical approach had any significant impact on the prognosis of patients undergoing this specific procedure. Before PSM, our dataset included 3,934 patients. After 1:2 PSM, the MIS group included 683 cases, while the open group included 1,317 cases. One notable finding was the reduced average postoperative hospital stay for the MIS group at 7.15 days compared to the open group at 8.40 days (P<0.001). Furthermore, the 5-year survival rate was similar, with the MIS group at 53.1% and the open group at 51.3% (P=0.683). The results of our study suggest that MIS for extended lobectomy not only is safe and feasible but also is oncologically effective. However, it is imperative to note that these encouraging findings necessitate further validation through prospective studies to ascertain the full scope of benefits and potential risks associated with MIS.

Abstract WMP73: Minimally Invasive Surgery for Intracerebral Hemorrhage: Meta-Analysis of High Quality RCTs

Background: Intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) represents a devastating clinical entity with disproportionately higher rates of mortality and functional disability compared to ischemic stroke. As large trials of craniotomy in ICH failed to prove functional benefits, minimally invasive surgery (MIS) represents a potential frontier of ICH management with evidence of functional and mortality improvements. We aimed to provide level A evidence of MIS role in ICH management. Methods: Independent authors searched four electronic databases (Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and CENTRAL) and assessed the methodological quality of included studies using the Cochrane risk of bias tool (RoB2). Only high-quality (low risk of bias in all RoB2 domains) randomized clinical trial (RCTs) were included. We pooled odd ratios (ORs) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using random-effects model. Results: Six high-quality RCTs met our inclusion criteria. Among 1551 ICH patients, 810 were allocated to the MIS group and 741 to non-MIS. MIS was associated with significantly lower odds of mortality or disability at 90-days (OR, 0.71 [95% CI, 0.52-0.97]; p = 0.03) and lower odds of 90-days mortality (OR, 0.71 [95% CI, 0.49-1.03]; p = 0.07). Rates of functional independence and favorable functional outcomes was higher in MIS treated individuals (OR, 1.81 [95% CI, 0.78-1.79]; p = 0.43) and (OR, 1.31 [95% CI, 0.96-1.78]; p = 0.09), respectfully. Conclusions: This meta-analysis provides level A evidence that supports the current notion of mortality and functional improvement in ICH individuals treated with MIS. Further RCTs are warranted to validate the generalizability of these results.

Radiographic Comparison of Open and Minimally Invasive Distal Chevron Metatarsal Osteotomy in Patients With Hallux Valgus

This study aimed to compare radiographic outcomes of open and minimally invasive surgery (MIS) in patients with hallux valgus. We reviewed data of patients with hallux valgus who underwent open or minimally invasive distal chevron osteotomy at our institution. Radiographic assessment was completed preoperatively, immediate postoperatively, and one year postoperatively using eight weight bearing parameters . The classic distal chevron osteotomy method was used for open surgery and a modified method that added percutaneous K-wire fixation to the minimal invasive Chevron-Akin (third-generation MIS) was used for correction of the distal metatarsal articular angle (DMAA). A total of 65 feet (33 open surgeries and 32 MIS) were included. The HVA, IMA, and DMAA improved significantly following surgery regardless of surgical method (p<0.001). Other radiographic indicators showed no statistically significant differences after surgery. DMAA improved by 71.0±14.2% after surgery, and the open surgery group showed less significant reduction in DMAA (49.7±25.7%, p<0.001). Other parameters showed no difference between the two groups regarding relative postoperative changes. The MIS group showed shorter operation time (p<0.001) and hospitalization period (p=0.034) than did the open surgery group. Therefore, the MIS group is expected to be cost-effective. Radiographic measurements revealed comparable outcomes of MIS compared with open surgery. Additionally, adding percutaneous K-wire fixation during MIS had an advantage in correcting DMAA compared with open surgery. Furthermore, the correction of DMAA could reduce recurrence of valgus deformity of the hallux.

Real-world Nationwide Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Surgery for Advanced Gastric Cancer Based on Korean Gastric Cancer Association-Led Survey.

The study aimed to investigate real-world surgical outcomes of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for advanced gastric cancer using Korean Gastric Cancer Association (KGCA)-led nationwide data. A nationwide survey of patients who underwent surgical treatment for gastric cancer in 2019 was conducted by the KGCA. A total of 14,076 patients from 68 institutions underwent surgery, and 4,953 patients diagnosed with pathological stages IB-III gastric cancer were included. Among them, 1,689 patients who underwent MIS (MIS group) and 1,689 who underwent the open approach (open group) were matched using propensity score in a 1:1 ratio. Surgical outcomes were compared, and multivariate analysis was performed to identify the independent factors for overall morbidity. The MIS group had a lower proportion of D2 lymphadenectomy, total omentectomy, and combined resection. However, the number of harvested lymph nodes was higher in the MIS group. Better surgical outcomes, including less blood loss and shorter hospital stay, were observed in the MIS group, and the overall morbidity rate was significantly lower in the MIS group (17.5% vs. 21.9%, P=0.001). The mortality rates did not differ significantly between the 2 groups. In the multivariate analysis, the minimally invasive approach was a significant protective factor against overall morbidity (odds ratio, 0.799; P=0.006). Based on the Korean nationwide data, MIS for stage IB-III gastric cancer had better short-term outcomes than the open approach, including lower rates of wound complications, intra-abdominal abscesses, and cardiac problems.

A retrospective study comparing minimally invasive versus open surgical resection of small intestinal neuroendocrine neoplasms at a tertiary referral center

IntroductionNeuroendocrine neoplasms (SI-NEN) are the commonest malignancies of the small intestine. Traditionally, surgical treatment for SI-NEN has been open surgery. PurposeThe purpose of this study was to compare minimally invasive surgery (MIS) with the traditional open surgery approach for treating SI-NEN in a Swedish population. MethodsPatients with histopathological confirmed SI-NEN who underwent open surgery or MIS resection within 2009–2021 were extracted from the hospital's medical records. Results65 patients were included in this study, with 35 (54 %) undergoing MIS and 30 (46 %) undergoing open surgery. We found no statistically significant difference (p = 0.173) in the frequency of R0 resections (MIS group n = 34 (97 %), open surgery group n = 26 (87 %)). Nor was there a significant difference (p = 0.101) when comparing the median number of resected lymph nodes (MIS group n = 13.5, open surgery group n = 10). A post-operative paralytic ileus was more often reported (p = 0.052) in the MIS group (n = 9, 26 %) compared to the open surgery group (n = 2, 7 %). In light of this, the days of hospital stay did not differ significantly (MIS group median = 6, IQR (5–8), open surgery group median = 6, IQR (5–9)). The Kaplan-Meier analysis did not reveal differences concerning cancer-related deaths (p = 0.109). ConclusionThe results from this study support that a MIS approach for the treatment of SI-NEN may not be inferior to open surgery. The higher number of resected lymph nodes and R0 resections may even speak in favor for a MIS approach. More studies with a longer time of observation are needed to further support this conclusion.

Comparison of Minimally Invasive Surgery with Open Surgery for Type II Endometrial Cancer: An Analysis of the National Cancer Database.

Prior studies comparing minimally invasive surgery with open surgery among patients with endometrial cancer have reported similar survival outcomes and improved perioperative outcomes with minimally invasive surgery (MIS). However, patients with Type II endometrial cancer were underrepresented in these studies. We sought to compare the overall survival and surgical outcomes between open surgery and MIS in a large cohort of women with Type II endometrial cancer. Using data from the National Cancer Database, we identified a cohort of women who underwent hysterectomy for type II endometrial cancer (serous, clear cell, and carcinosarcoma) between January 2010 and December 2014. The primary outcome was a comparison of the overall survival for MIS with that for the open approach. The secondary outcomes included a comparison of the length of hospital stay, readmission within 30 days of discharge, and 30- and 90-day mortality. Outcomes were compared between the cohorts using the Mann-Whitney U test, Pearson's chi-square test, or Fisher's exact test. Multivariable logistic regression with inverse propensity weighting was used to determine clinical characteristics that were statistically significant predictors of outcomes. p values < 0.05 were considered significant. We identified 12,905 patients with Type II, Stage I-III endometrial cancer that underwent a hysterectomy. In total, 7123 of these women (55.2%) underwent MIS. The rate of MIS increased from 39% to 64% over four years. Women who underwent MIS were more often White, privately insured, older, and had a higher income. The laparotomy group had a higher rate of carcinosarcoma histology (30.9% vs. 23.6%, p < 0.001), stage III disease (38.4% vs. 27.4%, p < 0.001), and larger primary tumors (59 vs. 45 mm, p < 0.001). Lymph node dissection was more commonly performed in the MIS group (89.6% vs. 85.4%, p < 0.001). With regard to adjuvant therapy, subjection to postoperative radiation was more common in the MIS group (37% vs. 40.1%, p < 0.001), while chemotherapy was more common in the laparotomy group (37.6% vs. 33.9%, p < 0.001). The time interval between surgery and the initiation of chemotherapy was shorter in the MIS group (39 vs. 42 days, p < 0.001). According to the results of propensity-score-weighted analysis, MIS was associated with superior overall survival (101.7 vs. 86.7 months, p = 0.0003 determined using the long-rank test), which corresponded to a 10% decreased risk of all-cause mortality (HR 0.9; CI 0.857-0.954, p = 0.0002). The survival benefit was uniform across all three histology types and stages. MIS was associated with superior perioperative outcomes, including shorter length of stay (1 vs. 4 days, p < 0.001), lower 30-day readmission rates (2.5% vs. 5%), and lower 30- and 90-day postoperative mortality (0.5% vs. 1.3% and 1.5% vs. 3.6%, respectively; p < 0.001 for both). The increased adoption of MIS from 2010 to 2014 corresponds to a decrease in 90-day postoperative mortality (2.8% to 2.2%, r = -0.89; p = 0.04) and overall mortality (51% to 38%, r = -0.95; p = 0.006). In a large cohort of patients from the National Cancer Database, MIS was associated with improved overall survival and superior perioperative outcomes compared to open surgery among women with Type II endometrial cancer. A decrease in postoperative mortality and a shorter interval between surgery and the initiation of chemotherapy may contribute to the survival benefit of MIS. A racial and economic disparity in the surgical management of Type II endometrial cancer was identified, and further investigation is warranted to narrow this gap and improve patient outcomes.

Feasibility and safety of planned early discharge following laparotomy in gynecologic oncology with enhanced recovery protocol including opioid-sparing anesthesia.

This study aims to evaluate the feasibility and safety of planned postoperative day 1 discharge (PPOD1) among patients who undergo laparotomy (XL) in the department of gynecology oncology utilizing a modified enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol including opioid-sparing anesthesia (OSA) and defined discharge criteria. Patients undergoing XL and minimally invasive surgery (MIS) were enrolled in this prospective, observational cohort study after the departmental implementation of a modified ERAS protocol. The primary outcome was quality of life (QoL) using SF36, PROMIS GI, and ICIQ-FLUTS at baseline and 2- and 6-week postoperative visits. Statistical significance was assessed using the two-tailed Student's t-test and non-parametric Mann-Whitney two-sample test. Of the 141 subjects, no significant demographic differences were observed between the XL group and the MIS group. The majority of subjects, 84.7% (61), in the XL group had gynecologic malignancy [vs. MIS group; 21 (29.2%), p < 0.001]. All patients tolerated OSA. The XL group required higher intraoperative opioids [7.1 ± 9.2 morphine milligram equivalents (MME) vs. 3.9 ± 6.9 MME, p = 0.02] and longer surgical time (114.2 ± 41 min vs. 96.8 ± 32.1 min, p = 0.006). No significant difference was noted in the opioid requirements at the immediate postoperative phase and the rest of the postoperative day (POD) 0 or POD 1. In the XL group, 69 patients (73.6%) were successfully discharged home on POD1. There was no increase in the PROMIS score at 2 and 6 weeks compared to the preoperative phase. The readmission rates within 30 days after surgery (XL 4.2% vs. MIS 1.4%, p = 0.62), rates of surgical site infection (XL 0% vs. MIS 2.8%, p = 0.24), and mean number of post-discharge phone calls (0 vs. 0, p = 0.41) were comparable between the two groups. Although QoL scores were significantly lower than baseline in four of the nine QoL domains at 2 weeks post-laparotomy, all except physical health recovered by the 6-week time point. PPOD1 is a safe and feasible strategy for XL performed in the gynecologic oncology department. PPOD1 did not increase opioid requirements, readmission rates compared to MIS, and patient-reported constipation and nausea/vomiting compared to the preoperative phase.

“Selection, planning and execution of minimally invasive surgery in adult spinal deformity correction”

Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for correction of adult spinal deformity was developed to address the high rate of medical and surgical complications rate in open surgical treatment of increasingly aging and frail patient population. In the past decade, MIS group within the International Spine Study Group (ISSG) has been in the forefront of the application of MIS techniques to fulfill the well-established principles of ASD surgery. These efforts have resulted in landmark studies. Here, we review these studies that encompass all aspects of MIS surgical treatment of ASD including patient selection with Minimally Invasive Spinal Deformity Surgery (MISDEF) and MISDEF-2 algorithms, surgical planning with anterior column realignment classification and the Minimally Invasive Interbody Selection Algorithm (MIISA), and surgical execution with Spinal Deformity Complexity Checklist (SDCC). We will highlight that with careful selection, diligent planning and meticulous execution the MIS techniques can treat patients with ASD, abiding to correction principles and radiographic parameters.

Long-term outcome of minimally invasive staging surgery for clinical stage I endometrial cancer: A single institute experience in Taiwan.

Endometrial cancer is the most common gynecological cancer in developed countries. With recent advances in equipment and knowledge, minimally invasive surgery (MIS) is widely accepted for the treatment of endometrial cancer. This study had the largest number of cases to date in Taiwan, comparing outcomes between MIS and laparotomy staging surgery using real-world data with long-term follow-up. We retrospectively reviewed patients with clinical stage 1 endometrial cancer from 2009 to 2020 in our institute. All patients underwent comprehensive surgical staging procedures by MIS or laparotomy. The safety, morbidity, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) rates of the two groups were compared. Clinical and pathologic factors were compared with Chi-square and Fisher Exact test. PFS and OS were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Differences between survival curves were analyzed using the log-rank test. A p value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Using Cox proportional hazards models, all factors found to be significantly associated with risk of recurrence on univariate analyses were then assessed together through multivariable models, resulting in a final oncologic outcome between MIS and laparotomy. A total of 665 cases (412 cases in MIS group and 253 cases in laparotomy group) were enrolled for data analysis. Median operation time was shorter in MIS group (244 and 265 minutes, p < 0.001). Median blood loss was also less (75 and 430 mL, p < 0.001). Median postoperative hospitalization duration was longer in the laparotomy group (2 and 7 days, p = 0.001). After adjusting presurgery risk factors, the PFS and OS were no significant difference in MIS and laparotomy groups. Using real-world data with long-term follow-up, we could confirm excellent PFS and OS in selective patients with clinical stage 1 endometrial carcinoma who received MIS, and the surgical time, hospital day, and blood loss were also less.

Propensity Score-Matched Analysis of Minimal Invasive Surgery versus Open Surgery for Colorectal Cancer in Older Patients.

Introduction: Currently, surgeons deal with an older patient cohort, confronting new challenges brought by the raised life expectancy. This population is unrepresented in surgical trials; therefore, the optimal therapy is still a matter of debate. The efficacy of open versus minimal invasive management of colorectal cancer (CRC) in an elderly cohort is not clearly established. The current study assesses the minimal invasive approach in elderly patients undergoing colorectal surgery. Material and Methods: The General Surgery Department database was inquired between 2012 and 2015 using the following filters: age â?¥ 65 and rectal or colon adenocarcinoma. After applying the exclusion criteria, 975 cases were obtained: 842 underwent open surgery (OS) and 133 underwent minimal invasive surgery (MIS). A propensity score matching was performed to reduce patient selection bias. Results: After the propensity score matching, the MIS group had a shorter postoperative hospital stay than the OS group (p = 0.025). From the preoperative variables, the presence of chronic lung disease was significantly higher in the OS group (p = 0.039). The presence of chronic lung disease positively associates with the Clavien-Dindo classification (p 0.001) and with the number of days from surgery to discharge (p = 0.028). Conclusion: The chronological age alone should not be a limit to MIS granting that it showed no inferiority to the OS in terms of postoperative morbidity, correlating with lower postoperative stay in the elderly. Further prospective studies are needed to assess the outcome of MIS in elderly population.

Minimally Invasive Surgery vs Open Approach to First Metatarsophalangeal Joint Arthrodesis: A Comparison of Surgical Outcomes

Category: Midfoot/Forefoot; Other Introduction/Purpose: Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) is becoming increasingly popular among foot and ankle orthopaedic surgeons, as it has been shown to have limited complication rates and faster recovery times. Although there is robust data on MIS to treat hallux valgus, few studies have evaluated the role of MIS for 1st metatarsophalangeal (MTP) fusion to treat hallux rigidus - the most common arthritis of the foot. Hallux rigidus affects 2.5% of the U.S. population over age 50. Given this disease prevalence, it is important to characterize outcomes following MTP fusion procedures to optimize surgical approaches. In this retrospective cohort study, we aim to compare (1) patient-reported pain, (2) rate of successful fusion, and (3) rate of complications between groups who underwent open or MIS 1st MTP arthrodesis. Methods: This retrospective cohort study was conducted by evaluating clinical metrics, surgical outcomes, and radiographic data through chart review of 78 patients (25 male, 53 female), who underwent a 1st MTP fusion procedure at a large urban academic medical center from July 2015 through January 2023. 71 patients had a diagnosis of hallux rigidus, with other common diagnoses including hammertoe (24), hallux valgus (24), additional arthritides (11), and metatarsalgia (11). Two patients were excluded from our analysis due to lack of sufficient orthopaedic follow-up preventing evaluation of joint fusion. Pre- and post-operative pain scores were recorded on a 0-10 scale, though some notes documented subjective experience of pain (e.g., “minimal”). Complications were identified using post-operative clinic notes. The following radiographic data were included: hallux valgus angle, intermetatarsal angle, Coughlin classification, presence of arthritis, pre-operative sesamoid position, fusion construct materials, and success of fusion. Results: Of the 80 1st MTP fusion surgeries (two patients received both left and right foot operations), 51 were open and 29 were minimally invasive. There was no significant difference in the change in pre- to post-operative pain between the two groups (p=0.39). MIS patients had a higher successful fusion rate (100.0%) when compared to open surgery patients (94.1%), though this difference was insignificant (p=0.55). There was no significant difference in overall complication rates between MIS and open surgery groups (p=0.79). However, the MIS patients did not have any cases of deep infection or wound dehiscence and all (5/5) of their complications were related to hardware removal after fusion, whereas half of the complications (5/10) for the open surgery patients were related to infection and wounds. Conclusion: This retrospective analysis of 78 patients treated for hallux rigidus with 1st MTP fusion surgery showed no significant difference in rates of successful fusion and complications among patients who received an MIS procedure compared to an open surgery. There was no difference in patient-reported pain improvement between the two groups. Our main limitation is provider specialization, as only one surgeon in this study performed the MIS cases. Further studies should be done to obtain higher-level evidence to elucidate potential benefits of MIS over open surgery for 1st MTP arthrodesis.

Comparison of Minimally Invasive and Open Approaches for Midfoot Charcot Neuroarthropathy Reconstruction

Charcot neuroarthropathy (CNA) is a progressive disease affecting the bones and joints of the foot that can lead to instability, breakdown, and collapse. Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) techniques are becoming a popular option within musculoskeletal surgery of the foot and ankle and may be an alternative to aggressive dissection seen during corrective surgery. An MIS approach minimizes vascular disruption, provides structural stability at an osteotomy or arthrodesis site, and encourages early mobilization if indicated. This retrospective study compares 17 patients who underwent an open approach for midfoot CNA reconstruction with 17 patients who underwent an MIS approach for midfoot CNA reconstruction. Preoperative and postoperative radiographic parameters were measured: lateral talus-first metatarsal, anteroposterior (AP) talus-first metatarsal, calcaneal pitch, and cuboid height. Difficulties that occurred during treatment were gathered and sorted into postoperative problems (stage I), obstacles (stage II), and complications (stage III). Changes from preoperative to postoperative radiographic lateral talus-first metatarsal and AP talus-first metatarsal angles were statistically significant (P < 0.001) for both the MIS and open approach. No true postoperative complications (stage III) were observed at last follow-up. The most common difficulty encountered was pin-site infection (stage I; in 23.5% of patients) in the MIS group. In the open group, the most common complications were wound development (stage I; 23.5%) and nonunions (stage II; 23.5%). Our findings suggest that midfoot CNA reconstruction with MIS methods offers similar outcomes to the open approach. LEVEL OF CLINICAL EVIDENCE: III.

Comparison of Minimally Invasive and Open Surgery for the Treatment of Endometrial Cancer with a High Risk of Recurrence: A Propensity Score Matching Study in Korea and Taiwan.

This study compared oncologic outcomes between minimally invasive surgery (MIS) and open surgery for the treatment of endometrial cancer with a high risk of recurrence. This study included patients with endometrial cancer who underwent primary surgery at two tertiary centers in Korea and Taiwan. Low-grade advanced-stage endometrial cancer (endometrioid grade 1 or 2) or endometrial cancer with aggressive histology (endometrioid grade 3 or non-endometrioid) at any stage was considered to have a high risk of recurrence. We conducted 1:1 propensity score matching between the MIS and open surgery groups to adjust for the baseline characteristics. Of the total of 582 patients, 284 patients were included in analysis after matching. Compared with open surgery, MIS did not show a difference in disease-free survival [hazard ratio (HR) 1.09; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.67-1.77, P = 0.717] or overall survival (HR 0.67; 95% CI 0.36-1.24, P = 0.198). In the multivariate analysis, non-endometrioid histology, tumor size, tumor cytology, depth of invasion, and lymphovascular space invasion were risk factors for recurrence. There was no association between the surgical approach and either recurrence or mortality in the subgroup analysis according to stage and histology. MIS did not compromise survival outcomes for patients with endometrial cancer with a high risk of recurrence when compared with open surgery.

Health-care expenditures are less for minimally invasive than open colectomy for colon cancer: A US commercial claims database analysis

BackgroundMost studies comparing surgical platforms focus on short-term outcomes. In this study, we compare the expanding societal penetration of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) with open colectomy by assessing payer and patient expenditures up to one year for patients undergoing surgery for colon cancer.MethodsWe analyzed the IBM MarketScan Database for patients who underwent left or right colectomy for colon cancer between 2013 and 2020. Outcomes included perioperative complications and total health-care expenditures up to 1 year following colectomy. We compared results for patients who had open colectomy (OS) to those with MIS operations. Subgroup analyses were performed for adjuvant chemotherapy (AC+) versus no adjuvant chemotherapy (AC-) groups and for laparoscopic (LS) versus robotic (RS) approaches.ResultsOf 7,063 patients, 4,417 cases did not receive adjuvant chemotherapy (OS: 20.1%, LS: 67.1%, RS: 12.7%) and 2646 cases had adjuvant chemotherapy (OS: 28.4%, LS: 58.7%, RS: 12.9%) after discharge. MIS colectomy was associated with lower mean expenditure at index surgery and post-discharge periods for AC- patients (index surgery: $34,588 vs $36,975; 365-day post-discharge $20,051 vs $24,309) and for AC+ patients (index surgery: $37,884 vs $42,160; 365-day post-discharge $103,341vs $135,113; p < 0.001 for all comparisons). LS had similar index surgery expenditures but significantly higher expenditures at post-discharge 30 days (AC-: $2,834 vs $2276, p = 0.005; AC+: $9100 vs $7698, p = 0.020) than RS. The overall complication rate was significantly lower in the MIS group than the open group for AC- patients (20.5% vs 31.2%) and AC+ patients (22.6% vs 39.1%, both p < 0.001).ConclusionMIS colectomy is associated with better value at lower expenditure than open colectomy for colon cancer at the index operation and up to one year after surgery. RS expenditure is less than LS in the first 30 postoperative days regardless of chemotherapy status and may extend to 1 year for AC- patients.

Percutaneous versus open posterior stabilization and decompression in AOSpine-type A3 thoracolumbar fractures with neurological deficit

BackgroundThis retrospective cohort study aimed to compare the clinical and radiological outcomes between two treatment strategies focusing on non-osteoporotic AOSpine-type A3 fractures of the thoracolumbar spine with neurological deficits at levels T11 to L2.MethodsIn total, 67 patients between 18 and 60 years of age who were treated operatively with either of the two treatment strategies were included. One treatment strategy included open posterior stabilization and decompression, whereas the other was based on percutaneous posterior stabilization and decompression via a tubular retraction system. Demographic data, surgical variables, and further parameters were assessed. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs), including the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and the American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) impairment score, were measured to assess functional outcomes. The regional Cobb angle (CA), the anterior height ratio of the fractured vertebrae (AHRV), and the degree of canal encroachment (DCE) were assessed. The ASIA score was used to assess neurological function recovery. The follow-up period was at least 12 months.ResultsSurgical time and postoperative hospital stay were significantly shorter in the minimally invasive surgery (MIS) group. Intraoperative blood loss was significantly less in the MIS group. Regarding radiological outcome, CA and AHRV at the time of follow-up did not show a significant difference. DCE at the time of follow-up was significantly improved in the MIS group. Lower VAS scores and better ODIs were observed in the MIS group at the 6-month follow-up, but similar outcomes were observed at the 12-month follow-up. The ASIA score was similar between both groups at the 12-month follow-up.ConclusionsBoth treatment strategies are safe and effective; however, MIS could provide earlier pain relief and better functional outcomes compared with OS.