Minimal Microvascular Resistance Research Articles

Aortic versus distal pressure for derivation of hyperaemic microvascular resistance: From the ILIAS registry

BackgroundIn patients with angina and non-obstructive coronary arteries (ANOCA), intracoronary function testing typically involves assessing the minimal microvascular resistance. This can be derived from the coronary flow and the distal pressure (Pd) during maximal hyperaemia. Theoretically, in ANOCA patients, resistance and pressure have minimal impact along the epicardial vessel, suggesting the possibility of deriving hyperaemic microvascular resistance (HMR) using aortic pressure (Pa) instead of Pd, but this has not been studied previously. Methods and resultsData from the ILIAS registry, a global multicentre registry pooling lesion-level coronary pressure and flow data, were used to compare HMR calculated with Pa versus Pd. A total of N = 1321 evaluated vessels were included. The study population consisted predominantly of men (68 %) with a mean age of 62 ± 10 years, and stable anginal symptoms (93 %). The overall correlation between HMR calculated with Pa and with Pd was good (Pearson's correlation coefficient: 0.84, p ≤0.005). The Bland-Altman plot showed a mean difference between HMR based on Pa and Pd of 0.53 (limits of agreements ±1.35). An adjusted Bland-Altman showed that the difference between HMR based on Pa and Pd was significantly related to the functional severity of the epicardial lesion (R2 = 0.71, coef.: −4.5, p < 0.005). In patients with a FFR >0.80 there were no considerable outliers, and with a FFR <0.80 outliers increased significantly. ConclusionsIn ANOCA patients, defined by a FFR above 0.80, HMR can be accurately measured with aortic pressure instead of distal pressure. However, in patients with a FFR below 0.80, there is a significant difference between HMR measured with Pa and Pd.

Effects of age on microvascular function in patients with normal coronary arteries.

It has been suggested that coronary microvascular function decreases with age, irrespective of the presence of epicardial atherosclerosis. Our aim is to quantitatively investigate the effects of age on microvascular function in patients with normal coronary arteries. In 314 patients with angina with no obstructive coronary artery disease (ANOCA), microcirculatory function was tested using the continuous thermodilution method. In 305 patients, the association between age and both resting and hyperaemic myocardial blood flow (Q), microvascular resistance (Rμ), absolute coronary flow reserve (CFR) and microvascular resistance reserve (MRR) was assessed. In addition, patients were divided into 3 groups to test for differences based on age quartiles (≤52 years [24.9%], 53-64 years [49.2%], ≥65 years [25.9%]). The mean age was 59±9 years with a range from 22 to 79 years. The mean resting Q (Qrest) was not different in the 3 age groups (88±34 mL/min, 82±29 mL/min, and 86±38 mL/min, R2=0.001; p=0.62). A trend towards a decreasing mean hyperaemic Q (Qmax) was observed with increasing age (223±79 mL/min, 209±84 mL/min, 200±80 mL/min, R2=0.010; p=0.083). The mean resting Rμ (Rμ,rest) were 1,204±460 Wood units (WU), 1,260±411 WU, and 1,289±455 WU (p=0.23). The mean hyperaemic Rμ (Rμ,hyp) increased significantly with advancing age (429±149 WU, 464±164 WU, 503±162 WU, R2=0.026; p=0.005). Consequently, MRR decreased with age (3.2±1.2, 3.1±1.0, 2.9±0.9; p=0.038). This trend was present in both the patients with (n=121) and without (n=184) coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD). There is an age-dependent physiological increase in minimal microvascular resistance and decrease in microvascular function, which is represented by a decreased MRR and is independent of atherosclerosis. The age-dependent decrease in MRR was present in both patients with and without CMD and was most evident in patients with smooth coronary arteries.

Impact of coronary hyperemia on collateral flow correction of coronary microvascular resistance indices.

Recently, a novel method to estimate wedge pressure (Pw)-corrected minimal microvascular resistance (MR) was introduced. However, this method has not been validated since, and there are some theoretical concerns regarding the impact of different physiological conditions on the derivation of Pw measurements. This study sought to validate the recently introduced method to estimate Pw-corrected MR in a Doppler-derived study population and to evaluate the impact of different physiological conditions on the Pw measurements and the derivation of Pw-corrected MR. The method to derive "estimated" hyperemic microvascular resistance (HMR) without the need for Pw measurements was validated by estimating the coronary fractional flow reserve (FFRcor) from myocardial fractional flow reserve (FFRmyo) in a Doppler-derived study population (N = 53). From these patients, 24 had hyperemic Pw measurements available for the evaluation of hyperemic conditions on the derivation of Pw and its effect on the derivation of both "true" (with measured Pw) and "estimated" Pw-corrected HMR. Nonhyperemic Pw differed significantly from Pw measured in hyperemic conditions (26 ± 14 vs. 35 ± 14 mmHg, respectively, P < 0.005). Nevertheless, there was a strong linear relationship between FFRcor and FFRmyo in nonhyperemic conditions (R2 = 0.91, P < 0.005), as well as in hyperemic conditions (R2 = 0.87, P < 0.005). There was a strong linear relationship between "true" HMR and "estimated" HMR using either nonhyperemic (R2 = 0.86, P < 0.005) or hyperemic conditions (R2 = 0.85, P < 0.005) for correction. In contrast to a modest agreement between nonhyperemic Pw-corrected HMR and apparent HMR (R2 = 0.67, P < 0.005), hyperemic Pw-corrected HMR showed a strong agreement with apparent HMR (R2 = 0.88, P < 0.005). We validated the calculation method for Pw-corrected MR in a Doppler velocity-derived population. In addition, we found a significant impact of hyperemic conditions on the measurement of Pw and the derivation of Pw-corrected HMR.NEW & NOTEWORTHY The following are what is known: 1) wedge-pressure correction is often considered for the derivation of indices of minimal microvascular resistance, and 2) the Yong method for calculating wedge pressure-corrected index of microvascular resistance (IMR) without balloon inflation has never been validated in a Doppler-derived population and has not been tested under different physiological conditions. This study 1) adds validation for the Yong method for calculated wedge-pressure correction in a Doppler-derived study population and 2) shows significant influence of the physiological conditions on the derivation of coronary wedge pressure.

Long-term changes in coronary physiology after aortic valve replacement.

The detrimental effects of long-standing severe aortic stenosis (AS) often include left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) and exhaustion of coronary flow reserve (CFR), the reversibility of which is unclear after valve replacement. Our aims were to 1) investigate whether CFR in the left anterior descending artery (LAD) would improve following valve replacement, and if the change was related to changes in hyperaemic coronary flow (QLAD) and minimal microvascular resistance (Rμ,LAD); and 2) investigate the relationship between changes in CFR and changes in left ventricular mass (LVM) and stroke work (LVSW). We measured intracoronary bolus thermodilution-derived CFR, and continuous thermodilution-derived QLAD and Rμ,LAD before and 6 months after aortic valve replacement. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging was used to quantify left ventricular anatomy and function for the calculation of LVM and LVSW. Results: Thirty-four patients were included (17 patients had transcatheter aortic valve implantation; 14 had surgical valve replacement with a bioprosthesis and 3 with a mechanical prosthesis) who underwent invasive assessment in the LAD. CFR increased from 2.5 (interquartile range [IQR] 1.5-3.3) at baseline to 3.1 (IQR 2.2-5.1) at follow-up (p=0.005), despite no significant change in QLAD (230±106 mL/min to 250±101 mL/min; p=0.26) or Rμ,LAD (347 [IQR 247-463] to 287 [IQR 230-456]; p=0.20). When indexed for LVM, QLAD was 39% (IQR 8-98%) higher at follow-up compared with baseline (p<0.001). The improvement in CFR was correlated with ΔLVSW, r= -0.39; p=0.047. Conclusions: CFR in the LAD increased significantly at follow-up although global hyperaemic flow and minimal microvascular resistance remained unchanged. Thus, a decrease in resting flow was the cause of CFR improvement. CFR improvement was associated with reduction in LVSW.

Physiological Impact of Afterload Reduction on Cardiac Mechanics and Coronary Hemodynamics Following Isosorbide Dinitrate Administration in Ischemic Heart Disease

Understanding the cardiac-coronary interaction is fundamental to developing treatment strategies for ischemic heart disease. We sought to examine the impact of afterload reduction following isosorbide dinitrate (ISDN) administration on LV properties and coronary hemodynamics to further our understanding of the cardiac-coronary interaction. Novel methodology enabled real-time simultaneous acquisition and analysis of coronary and LV hemodynamics in vivo using coronary pressure-flow wires (used to derive coronary wave energies) and LV pressure-volume loop assessment. ISDN administration resulted in afterload reduction, reduced myocardial demand, and increased mechanical efficiency (all P<0.01). Correlations were demonstrated between the forward compression wave (FCW) and arterial elastance (r=0.6) following ISDN. In the presence of minimal microvascular resistance, coronary blood flow velocity exhibited an inverse relationship with LV elastance. In summary this study demonstrated a reduction in myocardial demand with ISDN, an inverse relationship between coronary blood flow velocity and LV contraction-relaxation and a direct correlation between FCW and arterial elastance.Graphical abstractThe pressure volume-loop and corresponding parameters b The pressure volume loop before (solid line) and after (broken line) Isosorbide dintrate

Ischaemia without obstructive coronary artery disease: the pathophysiology of microvascular dysfunction.

Nearly one-third of patients presenting with angina have unobstructed epicardial coronary arteries and evidence of coronary microvascular disease. Up until recently, the pathophysiology of coronary microvascular disease has been poorly understood, resulting in limited effective therapeutic options in these patients. As a result, patients with coronary microvascular disease continue to suffer from a poor quality of life and adverse cardiovascular outcomes. Recent mechanistic studies have improved our understanding of the pathophysiology underlying coronary microvascular dysfunction; these studies have implicated the nitric oxide and endothelin pathways as the main drivers. The aim of this article is to review our current understanding of the pathophysiology of ischaemia in patients with coronary microvascular disease. Patients with angina who have coronary microvascular disease, but no obstructive coronary artery disease, are unable to augment their coronary blood flow in response to physiological stress, thereby predisposing them to myocardial ischaemia as a result of supply:demand mismatch in the myocardium. In addition to abnormalities of vascular resistance, perturbations in cardiac-coronary coupling also contribute to ischaemia in these patients. Although impaired flow reserve is the diagnostic hallmark, mechanistic studies have demonstrated that the underlying pathophysiology is heterogeneous. At present, two main endotypes have been identified, which can be readily differentiated on the basis of minimal microvascular resistance. A better understanding of the pathophysiology and mechanisms driving ischaemia in coronary microvascular dysfunction may stimulate the development of individualised therapies that may lead to an improvement in patients' quality of life and prognosis.

Physiological Stratification of Patients With Angina Due to Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction

BackgroundCoronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) is defined by diminished flow reserve. Functional and structural CMD endotypes have recently been described, with normal and elevated minimal microvascular resistance, respectively. ObjectivesThis study determined the mechanism of altered resting and maximal flow in CMD endotypes. MethodsA total of 86 patients with angina but no obstructive coronary disease underwent coronary pressure and flow measurement during rest, exercise, and adenosine-mediated hyperemia and were classified as the reference group or as patients with CMD by a coronary flow reserve threshold of 2.5; functional or structural endotypes were distinguished by a hyperemic microvascular resistance threshold of 2.5 mm Hg/cm/s. Endothelial function was assessed by forearm blood flow (FBF) response to acetylcholine, and nitric oxide synthase (NOS) activity was defined as the inverse of FBF reserve to NG-monomethyl-L-arginine. ResultsOf the 86 patients, 46 had CMD (28 functional, 18 structural), and 40 patients formed the reference group. Resting coronary blood flow (CBF) (24.6 ± 2.0 cm/s vs. 16.6 ± 3.9 cm/s vs. 15.1 ± 4.7 cm/s; p < 0.001) and NOS activity (2.27 ± 0.96 vs. 1.77 ± 0.59 vs. 1.30 ± 0.16; p < 0.001) were higher in the functional group compared with the structural CMD and reference groups, respectively. The structural group had lower acetylcholine FBF augmentation than the functional or reference group (2.1 ± 1.8 vs. 4.1 ± 1.7 vs. 4.5 ± 2.0; p < 0.001). On exercise, oxygen demand was highest (rate−pressure product: 22,157 ± 5,497 beats/min/mm Hg vs. 19,519 ± 4,653 beats/min/mm Hg vs. 17,530 ± 4,678 beats/min/mm Hg; p = 0.004), but peak CBF was lowest in patients with structural CMD compared with the functional and reference groups. ConclusionsFunctional CMD is characterized by elevated resting flow that is linked to enhanced NOS activity. Patients with structural CMD have endothelial dysfunction, which leads to diminished peak CBF augmentation and increased demand during exercise. The value of pathophysiologically stratified therapy warrants investigation.

Contribution of Age-Related Microvascular Dysfunction to Abnormal Coronary: Hemodynamics in Patients With Ischemic Heart Disease

ObjectivesThis study sought to investigate the contribution of age-related microcirculatory dysfunction to abnormal coronary hemodynamics in patients with coronary atherosclerosis. BackgroundImpairment in myocardial blood supply in patients with coronary atherosclerosis can be accentuated due to age-related changes in microcirculatory function. MethodsIntracoronary pressure and flow were measured with the Doppler technique in 299 vessels (228 patients), and the thermodilution technique in 120 vessels (99 patients). In 172 patients, Doppler measurements were also performed in unobstructed vessels. Associations of coronary hemodynamics with aging were studied in both the stenosed and unobstructed arteries. ResultsAging was associated with a progressive increase in minimal microvascular resistance and a progressive decrease in hyperemic flow in both obstructed and nonobstructed coronary arteries. As such, coronary flow reserve decreased with advancing age. Epicardial stenosis severity assessed by resting Pd/Pa, basal stenosis resistance index, and hyperemic stenosis resistance index was equivalent across age groups. By contrast, fractional flow reserve increased with advancing age. Consequently, the adjusted risk of a fractional flow reserve/coronary flow reserve pattern reflective of concomitant focal epicardial and diffuse or microvascular disease (relative risk: 1.6; 95% confidence interval: 1.1 to 2.3; p = 0.017) increased with advancing age, whilst the adjusted risk of a fractional flow reserve/coronary flow reserve pattern reflective of non–flow-limiting stenosis with a healthy microcirculation decreased (relative risk: 0.7; 95% CI: 0.5 to 1.0; p = 0.022). ConclusionsAging is associated with progressive pan-myocardial impairment of coronary vasodilatory capacity due to an increase in minimal microvascular resistance. Concomitant aging-related impairment in microvascular function impacts the pathophysiology of ischemic heart disease in the individual patient and is not adequately identified by hyperemic coronary pressure measurements alone.

Downstream Influence of Coronary Stenoses on Microcirculatory Remodeling: A Histopathology Study.

Inducible myocardial ischemia is influenced by contributions of both the epicardial artery and the coronary microcirculation. Experimental studies have found adverse microcirculatory remodeling to occur downstream of severe coronary stenoses. Coronary physiology studies in patients contradict the experimental findings, as the minimal microvascular resistance is not modified by stenoses. The objective was to determine whether microcirculatory remodeling occurs downstream of coronary stenoses in the human coronary circulation. Approach and Results: Myocardium corresponding to 115 coronary arteries of 55 deceased patients was investigated. Histopathologic staining of the microcirculation was performed using antibodies against SMA-α (smooth muscle actin-α) and CD31, to stain arterioles and capillaries, respectively. The following parameters were analyzed: ratio between lumen and vesel area, ratio between lumen and vessel diameter (both ratios for arterioles of <40, 40-100, and 100-200 µm diameter), arteriolar density, and capillary density. From the 55 patients, 32 pairs of an unobstructed coronary artery and a coronary artery with a stenosis were formed. No statistically significant differences between any of the microcirculatory parameters were found. A confirmatory unpaired analysis compared 3 groups: (1) coronary arteries in patients without coronary artery disease (n=53), (2) unobstructed coronary arteries in patients with a stenosis in one of the other coronary arteries (n=23), and (3) coronary stenoses (n=39). No statistically significant differences were observed between the groups. The microcirculation distal to noncritical stenoses does not undergo structural remodeling in the human coronary circulation.

TCT-94 Continuous infusion of saline for assessment of absolute hyperemic flow and minimal microvascular resistance: validation in humans using [15O]H2O PET

Thermodilution through continuous infusion of saline is a novel technique to selectively quantify absolute coronary flow. Together with distal coronary pressure, this technique allows for assessment of microvascular resistance (MVR). Of note, intracoronary infusion of room-temperature saline is

Invasive minimal Microvascular Resistance Is a New Index to Assess Microcirculatory Function Independent of Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease.

BackgroundCoronary microcirculatory dysfunction portends a poor cardiovascular outcome. Invasive assessment of microcirculatory dysfunction by coronary flow reserve (CFR) and hyperemic microvascular resistance (HMR) is affected by coronary artery disease (CAD). In this study we propose minimal microvascular resistance (mMR) as a new measure of microcirculatory dysfunction and aim to determine whether mMR is influenced by CAD.Methods and ResultsWe obtained 482 simultaneous measurements of intracoronary Doppler flow velocity and pressure. The mMR is defined as the ratio between distal coronary pressure and flow velocity during the hyperemic wave‐free period. Measurements were divided into 2 cohorts. Cohort 1 was a paired analysis involving 81 pairs with a vessel with and without CAD to investigate whether HMR, CFR, and mMR are modulated by CAD. CFR was lower, and HMR was higher, in vessels with CAD than in vessels without CAD: 2.12±0.79 versus 2.56±0.63 mm Hg·cm−1·s, P<0.001, and 2.61±1.22 versus 2.31±0.89 mm Hg·cm−1·s, P=0.04, respectively. mMR was equal in vessels with and without CAD: 1.54±0.77 versus 1.53±0.57 mm Hg·cm−1·s, P=0.90. Differences for CFR occurred when FFR was 0.60 to 0.80 or ≤0.60 but not when FFR ≥0.80. For HMR, the difference occurred only when FFR ≤0.60. For mMR, no difference was observed in any FFR stratum. Cohort 2 was used for validation and showed significant relationships for CFR and HMR with FFR: Pearson r=0.488, P<0.001 and −0.159, P=0.03, respectively; mMR had no association with FFR: Pearson r=0.055; P=0.32.Conclusions mMR is a novel index to assess microcirculatory dysfunction and is not modified by the presence of obstructive CAD.

TCT-524 Invasive minimal Microvascular Resistance (mMR); a new index to assess microcirculatory dysfunction that is not modulated by the presence of angiographic coronary artery disease

TCT-524 Invasive minimal Microvascular Resistance (mMR); a new index to assess microcirculatory dysfunction that is not modulated by the presence of angiographic coronary artery disease

Microvascular dysfunction in the immediate aftermath of chronic total coronary occlusion recanalization.

The aim of this study was to compare microvascular resistance under both baseline and hyperemic conditions immediately after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of a chronic total occlusion (CTO) with an unobstructed reference vessel in the same patient Microvascular dysfunction has been reported to be prevalent immediately after CTO PCI. However, previous studies have not made comparison with a reference vessel. Patients with a CTO may have global microvascular and/or endothelial dysfunction, making comparison with established normal values misleading. After successful CTO PCI in 21 consecutive patients, coronary pressure and flow velocity were measured at baseline and hyperemia in distal segments of the CTO/target vessel and an unobstructed reference vessel. Hemodynamics including hyperemic microvascular resistance (HMR), basal microvascular resistance (BMR), and instantaneous minimal microvascular resistance at baseline and hyperemia were calculated and compared between reference and target/CTO vessels. After CTO PCI, BMR was reduced in the target/CTO vessel compared with the reference vessel: 3.58 mm Hg/cm/s vs 4.94 mm Hg/cm/s, difference -1.36 mm Hg/cm/s (-2.33 to -0.39, p = 0.008). We did not detect a difference in HMR: 1.82 mm Hg/cm/s vs 2.01 mm Hg/cm/s, difference -0.20 (-0.78 to 0.39, p = 0.49). Instantaneous minimal microvascular resistance correlated strongly with the length of stented segment at baseline (r = 0.63, p = 0.005) and hyperemia (r = 0.68, p = 0.002). BMR is reduced in a recanalized CTO in the immediate aftermath of PCI compared to an unobstructed reference vessel; however, HMR appears to be preserved. A longer stented segment is associated with increased microvascular resistance. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Evolving concepts of angiogram: fractional flow reserve discordances in 4000 coronary stenoses

The present analysis addresses the potential clinical and physiologic significance of discordance in severity of coronary artery disease between the angiogram and fractional flow reserve (FFR) in a large and unselected patient population. Between September 1999 and December 2011, FFR and percent diameter stenosis (DS) as assessed by quantitative coronary angiography were obtained in 2986 patients (n = 4086 coronary stenoses), in whom at least one stenosis was of intermediate angiographic severity. Fractional flow reserve correlated slightly but significantly with DS [-0.38 (95% CI: -0.41; -0.36); P < 0.001]. The sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy of a ≥ 50% DS for predicting FFR ≤ 0.80 were 61% (95% CI: 59; 63), 67% (95% CI: 65; 69), and 0.64 (95% CI: 0.56; 0.72), respectively. In different anatomical settings, sensitivity and specificity showed marked variations between 35 to 74% and 58 to 76%, respectively, resulting in a discordance in 35% of all cases for these thresholds. For an angiographic threshold of 70% DS, the diagnostic performance by the Youden's index decreased from 0.28 to 0.11 for the overall population. The data confirm that one-third of a large patient population shows discordance between angiogram ≥ 50%DS and FFR ≤ 0.8 thresholds of stenosis severity. Left main stenoses are often underestimated by the classical 50% DS cut-off compared with FFR. This discordance offers physiologic insights for future trials. It is hypothesized that the discordance between angiography and FFR is related to technical limitations, such as imprecise luminal border detection by angiography, as well as to physiologic factors, such as variable minimal microvascular resistance.

Minimal microvascular resistance is associated with the extent of epicardial stenosis severity and is significantly associated with the presence of reversible myocardial ischemia

Background: Although myocardial ischemia is a consequence of both epicardial and microvascular abnormalities, clinical decision-making by fractional flow reserve is based on the extent of epicardial disease only. We sought to determine the association between epicardial stenosis severity and minimal microvascular resistance, and its pertinence for the occurrence of myocardial ischemia in patients with stable coronary artery disease of intermediate severity. Methods: We studied 232 patients, including 299 intermediate coronary lesions that were evaluated by intracoronary pressure and flow measurements. From these data, we calculated the fractional flow reserve (FFR) and hyperemic microvascular resistance (HMR). Myocardial perfusion imaging was performed prior to angiography in all patients. Logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate the association between FFR, HMR, and ischemia. Moreover, the effect of a high HMR on myocardial ischemia in the presence of a significant stenosis by FFR was evaluated. High microvascular resistance was defined as HMR >2.0 mmHg/cm/s. Results: In bivariate analysis, FFR and HMR were both associated with myocardial ischemia on MPS (Odds ratio 0.001 95% confidence interval 0.000 – 0.009; P<0.001 for FFR, and odds ratio 1.62 95% confidence interval: 1.21 – 2.16; P=0.001 for HMR, respectively). In the presence of a significant coronary stenosis by FFR ≤0.80, the presence of a high HMR was associated with a significantly higher frequency of reversible ischemia on MPS (Figure). ![Figure][1] Conclusion: Minimal microvascular resistance is of significant added pertinence to epicardial stenosis severity for the occurrence of myocardial ischemia in coronary lesions of intermediate severity. [1]: pending:yes

Value of admission glucose to predict impaired coronary microcirculation in acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction

Background: Acute hyperglycemia is frequently observed in non-diabetic ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients. It is thought to be associated with the release of stress-mediators like noradrenalin and cortisol, which antagonize insulin and promote glycogenolysis and hyperglycemia, or with the high incidence of impaired glucose tolerance among STEMI patients. Hyperglycemia recently was shown to be associated with the no-reflow phenomenon, which is mainly a manifestation of microvascular dysfunction. We recently showed that no-reflow (or not achieving TIMI 3 flow) with primary PCI for STEMI had independent prognostic value with regard tot 30-day, as well as 1-year mortality, next to admission glucose. Although no reflow in this study was an indirect measure of microvascular dysfunction, the significant association between no-reflow and increasing admission glucose and the attenuation of the effect of no-reflow by glucose concentration in multivariate analysis indicate the role of acute hyperglycemia in the pathophysiology of microvascular dysfunction. Methods: In 76 patients with a first anterior wall STEMI, baseline and minimal microvascular resistance in IRAs and non-IRAs immediately after reperfusion and at 1-week and 6-month follow-up were calculated as the ratio of mean transvascular pressure gradient to mean baseline and to adenosine-induced hyperemic blood flow velocity, respectively. Patients were divided in two groups, glucose below 11.0 mmol/L (group A) and glucose equal or higher than 11 mmol/L (group B), according to a cut-off level of the American Diabetes Association and the Euro Heart Survey. Results: Minimum microvascular resistance, defined as the ratio of mean distal pressure to average peak blood flow velocity during maximum hyperemia, showed a large variability (overall range, 0.75 to 4.89 mm Hg cm-1 s-1) and was significantly higher in group B than in group A immediately after reperfusion and at 1-week. Conclusion: In conclusion, minimal microvascular resistance is higher in anterior STEMI patients with hyperglycemia equal or above 11.0 mmol/L compared to patients with glucose leven lower than 11.0 mmol/L. Hyperglycemia in STEMI patients could prove to be an important predictor of microvacular dysfunction and obstruction.

Microcirculatory function and left ventricular recovery after STEMI, exploring the hidden territories

Microcirculatory function and left ventricular recovery after STEMI, exploring the hidden territories

Time Course of Microvascular Resistance of the Infarct and Noninfarct Coronary Artery Following an Anterior Wall Acute Myocardial Infarction

Previous studies have suggested that coronary flow velocity reserve (CFVR) in the early phase of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is abnormal in infarcted and remote regions. This study determined the coronary microvascular resistance of infarct-related arteries (IRAs) and non-IRAs during AMI and at follow-up in patients who were treated with primary percutaneous intervention. In 73 patients with a first anterior wall AMI, baseline and minimal microvascular resistance in IRAs and non-IRAs immediately after reperfusion and at 1-week and 6-month follow-up were calculated as the ratio of mean transvascular pressure gradient to mean baseline and to adenosine-induced hyperemic blood flow velocity, respectively. CFVR in IRAs increased from 1.6 +/- 0.4 after reperfusion to 1.9 +/- 0.5 at 1 week and to 3.0 +/- 0.8 at 6 months (p <0.0001) and in non-IRAs from 2.4 +/- 0.5 to 2.7 +/- 0.6 at 1 week to 3.3 +/- 0.6 at 6 months (p <0.0001). Minimal microvascular resistance in IRAs and non-IRAs (3.2 +/- 1.7 and 2.2 +/- 0.6 mm Hg/second/cm, respectively) decreased significantly at follow-up (2.0 +/- 0.6 and 1.7 +/- 0.6 mm Hg/second/cm at 1 week and 1.8 +/- 0.6 and 1.8 +/- 0.7 mm Hg/second/cm at 6 months, respectively). After correction for rate-pressure product, baseline microvascular resistance after reperfusion and at 6 months did not significantly differ between IRAs and non-IRAs. In conclusion, minimal microvascular resistance is higher in infarcted and noninfarcted regions during AMI than at follow-up. The low CFVR in remote regions during AMI is probably due more to disturbed autoregulation than to increased myocardial workload.

Epicardial stenosis severity does not affect minimal microcirculatory resistance.

Whether minimal microvascular resistance of the myocardium is affected by the presence of an epicardial stenosis is controversial. Recently, an index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR) was developed that is based on combined measurements of distal coronary pressure and thermodilution-derived mean transit time. In normal coronary arteries, IMR correlates well with true microvascular resistance. However, to be applicable in the case of an epicardial stenosis, IMR should account for collateral flow. We investigated the feasibility of determining IMR in humans and tested the hypothesis that microvascular resistance is independent of epicardial stenosis. Thirty patients scheduled for percutaneous coronary intervention were studied. The stenosis was stented with a pressure guidewire, and coronary wedge pressure (P(w)) was measured during balloon occlusion. After successful stenting, a short compliant balloon with a diameter 1.0 mm smaller than the stent was placed in the stented segment and inflated with increasing pressures, creating a 10%, 50%, and 75% area stenosis. At each of the 3 degrees of stenosis, fractional flow reserve (FFR) and IMR were measured at steady-state maximum hyperemia induced by intravenous adenosine. A total of 90 measurements were performed in 30 patients. When uncorrected for P(w), an apparent increase in microvascular resistance was observed with increasing stenosis severity (IMR=24, 27, and 37 U for the 3 different degrees of stenosis; P<0.001). In contrast, when P(w) is appropriately accounted for, microvascular resistance did not change with stenosis severity (IMR=22, 23, and 23 U, respectively; P=0.28). Minimal microvascular resistance does not change with epicardial stenosis severity, and IMR is a specific index of microvascular resistance when collateral flow is properly taken into account.

Microvascular Resistance Is Not Influenced by Epicardial Coronary Artery Stenosis Severity

The effect of epicardial artery stenosis on myocardial microvascular resistance remains controversial. Recruitable collateral flow, which may affect resistance, was not incorporated into previous measurements. In an open-chest pig model, distal coronary pressure was measured with a pressure wire, and the apparent minimal microvascular resistance was calculated during peak hyperemia as pressure divided by flow, measured either with a flow probe around the coronary artery (R(micro app)) or with a novel thermodilution technique (apparent index of microcirculatory resistance [IMR(app)]). These apparent resistances were compared with the actual R(micro) and IMR after the coronary wedge pressure and collateral flow were incorporated into the calculation. Measurements were made at baseline (no stenosis) and after creation of moderate and severe epicardial artery stenoses. In 6 pigs, 189 measurements of R(micro) and IMR were made under the various epicardial artery conditions. Without consideration of collateral flow, R(micro app) (0.43+/-0.12 to 0.46+/-0.10 to 0.51+/-0.11 mm Hg/mL per minute) and IMR(app) (14+/-4 to 17+/-7 to 20+/-10 U) increased progressively and significantly with increasing epicardial artery stenosis (P<0.001 for both). With the incorporation of collateral flow, neither R(micro) nor IMR increased as a result of increasing epicardial artery stenosis. After collateral flow is taken into account, the minimum achievable microvascular resistance is not affected by increasing epicardial artery stenosis.