Minimal Extracorporeal Circuit Research Articles

New, Virtually Wall-less Cannulas Designed for Augmented Venous Drainage in Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery.

Inadequate venous drainage during minimally invasive cardiac surgery becomes most evident when the blood trapped in the pulmonary circulation floods the surgical field. The present study was designed to assess the in vivo performance of new, thinner, virtually wall-less, venous cannulas designed for augmented venous drainage in comparison to traditional thin-wall cannulas. Remote cannulation was realized in 5 bovine experiments (74.0 ± 2.4 kg) with percutaneous venous access over the wire, serial dilation up to 18 F and insertion of either traditional 19 F thin wall, wire-wound cannulas, or through the same access channel, new, thinner, virtually wall-less, braided cannulas designed for augmented venous drainage. A standard minimal extracorporeal circuit set with a centrifugal pump and a hollow fiber membrane oxygenator, but no in-line reservoir was used. One hundred fifty pairs of pump-flow and required pump inlet pressure values were recorded with calibrated pressure transducers and a flowmeter calibrated by a volumetric tank and timer at increasing pump speed from 1500 RPM to 3500 RPM (500-RPM increments). Pump flow accounted for 1.73 ± 0.85 l/min for wall-less versus 1.17 ± 0.45 l/min for thin wall at 1500 RPM, 3.91 ± 0.86 versus 3.23 ± 0.66 at 2500 RPM, 5.82 ± 1.05 versus 4.96 ± 0.81 at 3500 RPM. Pump inlet pressure accounted for 9.6 ± 9.7 mm Hg versus 4.2 ± 18.8 mm Hg for 1500 RPM, -42.4 ± 26.7 versus -123 ± 51.1 at 2500 RPM, and -126.7 ± 55.3 versus -313 ± 116.7 for 3500 RPM. At the well-accepted pump inlet pressure of -80 mm Hg, the new, thinner, virtually wall-less, braided cannulas provide unmatched venous drainage in vivo. Early clinical analyses have confirmed these findings.

Comparison of Warm Blood Cardioplegia Delivery With or Without the Use of a Roller Pump

Various techniques for administration of blood cardioplegia are used worldwide. In this study, the effect of warm blood cardioplegia administration with or without the use of a roller pump on perioperative myocardial injury was studied in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting using minimal extra-corporeal circuits (MECCs). Sixty-eight patients undergoing elective coronary bypass surgery with an MECC system were consecutively enrolled and randomized into a pumpless group (PL group: blood cardioplegia administration without roller pump) or roller pump group (RP group: blood cardioplegia administration with roller pump). No statistically significant differences were found between the PL group and RP group regarding release of cardiac biomarkers. Maximum postoperative biomarker values reached at T1 (after arrival intensive care unit) for heart-type fatty acid binding protein (2.7 [1.5; 6.0] ng/mL PL group vs. 3.2 [1.6; 6.3] ng/mL RP group, p = .63) and at T3 (first postoperative day) for troponin T high-sensitive (22.0 [14.5; 29.3] ng/L PL group vs. 21.1 [15.3; 31.6] ng/L RP group, p = .91), N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (2.1 [1.7; 2.9] ng/mL PL group vs. 2.6 [1.6; 3.6] ng/mL RP group, p = .48), and C-reactive protein (138 [106; 175] μg/mL PL group vs. 129 [105; 161] μg/mL RP group, p = .65). Besides this, blood cardioplegia flow, blood cardioplegia line pressure, and aortic root pressure during blood cardioplegia administration were similar between the two groups. Administration of warm blood cardioplegia with or without the use of a roller pump results in similar clinically acceptable myocardial protection.

O3-12-1 - Pharmacokinetic advantage of hipec using minimal extracorporeal circuit in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis

O3-12-1 - Pharmacokinetic advantage of hipec using minimal extracorporeal circuit in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis

Minimal access aortic valve replacement using minimal extracorporeal circuit

A minimal extracorporeal circuit has been shown to decrease the transfusion rate, cardiac and neurological damage in coronary surgery. We describe in detail a technique for minimal-access aortic valve replacement using a minimal extra-corporeal circuit, and provide surgical and perfusion tips to maintain antegrade perfusion and a clear surgical field.

Beneficial effects of using a minimal extracorporeal circulation system during coronary artery bypass grafting

In this study, we assessed clinical results by using a minimal extracorporeal circuit (MECC) and compared it to a conventional cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) system in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) procedures. From August to October 2006, forty consecutive patients undergoing isolated CABG procedures were randomly assigned to either a miniaturized closed circuit CPB with the Maquet-Cardiopulmonary MECC system (Group M, n=20) or to a conventional CPB system (Group C, n=20). Clinical outcomes were observed before, during and after the operation. Besides evaluating the perioperative clinical data, serial blood venous samples were obtained after induction, 30 minutes after CPB initiation, 2h, 6h, 12h, and 24h post-CPB. The focus of our study was on myocardial damage (cTnI), neutrophil and platelet counts, activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) and free hemoglobin. Both the transfusion of packed red blood cells and fresh frozen plasma were significantly lower in Group M compared to Group C (p<0.05). The levels of cTnI were lower in Group M at 2h, 6h and 12h post-CPB than in Group C (p<0.01). The values of aPTT in Group M recovered to normal levels after surgery, but were prolonged in Group C at early post-CPB and were statistically longer than Group M at 2h, 6h, and 12h post-CPB (p<0.05). The concentrations of free hemoglobin in Group C were higher than in Group M during and post-CPB, and there was a statistical difference at 2h post-CPB (p<0.05). In conclusion, the MECC system is a safe alternative for patients who undertake extracorporeal circulation (ECC) for CABG surgery. Lower transfusion requirements and less damage to red cells may further promote the use of MECC systems, especially in higher risk patients.

J-shaped versus median sternotomy for aortic valve replacement with minimal extracorporeal circuit

Objectives. Minimal access Aortic Valve Replacement (AVR) has been demonstrated to have beneficial effects over median sternotomy. Minimal extracorporeal circulation (MECC) has been shown to have less deleterious effects than conventional cardiopulmonary bypass. We describe for the first time AVR via upper J-shaped partial sternotomy compared to median sternotomy using MECC. Methods. Prospectively collected pre-operative, intra-operative, post-operative and follow-up data from 104 consecutive patients who underwent minimal access AVR were compared to 72 consecutive patients undergoing median sternotomy using MECC during the same period (January 2007 to December 2009). Results. No significant differences were found in patient's characteristics or intra-operative data with the exception of pre-existing pulmonary disease. The mean cardiopulmonary bypass (86 ± 18 min vs. 78 ± 15 min, p = 0.0079) and cross-clamp times (65 ± 13 min vs. 59 ± 12 min, p = 0.0013) were significantly shorter in the median sternotomy group. Mediastinal blood loss (397 ± 257 ml vs. 614 ± 339 ml, p < 0.0001) and ventilation time (8 ± 6.9 h vs. 11 ± 16.5 h, p = 0.0054) were significantly less in the minimal access group. No differences were seen in transfusion requirements, inotropic support, intensive care unit (ICU) stay, total hospital stay, post-operative haemoglobin drop, major events or mortality. Quality of life scores after discharge demonstrated less pain with a quicker recovery and return to daily activities in patients receiving J-shaped sternotomy. Conclusions. Minimal access AVR using MECC is feasible and provides excellent clinical results. Less pain and quicker recovery was experienced among patients in this group.

Air Removal Efficiency of a Venous Bubble Trap in a Minimal Extracorporeal Circuit During Coronary Artery Bypass

Artificial OrgansVolume 35, Issue 5 p. 555-555 Air Removal Efficiency of a Venous Bubble Trap in a Minimal Extracorporeal Circuit During Coronary Artery Bypass Marco Stehouwer, Marco Stehouwer St. Antonius Ziekenhuis, Department of Extracoporeal Circulation, Koekoekslaan 13435 CM, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands. E-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this author Marco Stehouwer, Marco Stehouwer St. Antonius Ziekenhuis, Department of Extracoporeal Circulation, Koekoekslaan 13435 CM, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands. E-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this author First published: 20 May 2011 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1594.2011.01252.xCitations: 1Read the full textAboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat No abstract is available for this article.Citing Literature Volume35, Issue5May 2011Pages 555-555 RelatedInformation

A comparison of low vs conventional‐dose heparin for minimal cardiopulmonary bypass in coronary artery bypass grafting surgery

The biocompatibility of minimal extracorporeal circuits has improved; however, anticoagulation is still required. We compared standard high-dose anticoagulation with a low-dose heparin regimen in a retrospective study of patients who underwent coronary bypass surgery using minimal cardiopulmonary bypass. One hundred patients who received 300 IU.kg(-1) heparin were compared with 68 patients who received heparin according to an individually adjusted activated coagulation time target of 300 s, resulting in a mean (SD) heparin dose of 145 (30) IU.kg(-1) . There were no thromboembolic events in either group; however, patients in the low-dose group had lower 24-hour mean (SD) postoperative blood loss than the conventional group (545 (61) vs 680 (88) ml, p=0.001) and a reduced rate of transfusion of allogeneic blood (15% patients transfused vs 32%, p=0.01). An individually tailored low-dose heparin regimen for minimal cardiopulmonary bypass is safe and may be associated with reduced bleeding and lower transfusion requirements.

Autotransfusion system or integrated automatic suction device in minimized extracorporeal circulation: influence on coagulation and inflammatory response

To measure surrogate markers of coagulation activation as well as of the systemic inflammatory response in patients undergoing primary elective coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) using either the so-called Smart suction device or a continuous autotransfusion system (C.A.T.S.®). Fifty-eight patients being operated with a miniaturized circuit (minimal extracorporeal circuit, MECC) were prospectively randomized to using a so-called Smart suction device or a routine continuous autotransfusion system (C.A.T.S.®) for collection of mediastinal shed blood. The coagulation response was measured by thrombin-antithrombin complex (TAT) and D-dimer. The inflammatory response was measured by Interleukin 6 (IL-6) and complement factor 3a (C3a) at three different time points, before surgery, 2h after surgery, as well as 18 h after surgery. No serious adverse cardiovascular event was observed. Serum levels of TAT significantly differed between both groups 2h after surgery (Smart suction 16.12 ± 13.51 μg l⁻¹ vs C.A.T.S® 9.83 ± 7.81 μg l⁻¹, p = 0.040) and returned to baseline values after 18 h in both groups. Serum levels of D-dimer showed a corresponding pattern with a peak 2h after surgery (Smart suction 1115 ± 1231 ng ml⁻¹ vs C.A.T.S.® 507 ± 604 ng ml⁻¹, p = 0.025). IL-6 levels also significantly differed between both groups 2h after surgery (Smart suction 186 ± 306 pg ml⁻¹ vs C.A.T.S.® 82 ± 71 pg ml⁻¹, p = 0.072). No significant changes in serum levels of C3a over time could be observed. Despite no differences in the clinical course of patients with either Smart suction or C.A.T.S.® being observed, surrogate markers of coagulation and inflammation seem to be less pronounced in patients where cardiotomy blood is not being directly reinfused. As such, C.A.T.S.® should be preferred in routine CABG, as long as no extensive volume substitution is anticipated.

Air Removal Efficiency of a Venous Bubble Trap in a Minimal Extracorporeal Circuit During Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

The use of minimized extracorporeal circuits (MECC) in cardiac surgery is expanding. These circuits eliminate volume storage and bubble trap reservoirs to minimize the circuit. However, this may increase the risk of gaseous micro emboli (GME). To reduce this risk, a venous bubble trap was designed. This study was performed to evaluate if incorporation of a venous bubble trap in a MECC system as compared to our standard minimized extracorporeal circuit without venous bubble trap reduces gaseous micro emboli during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). Forty patients were randomly assigned to be perfused either with or without an integrated venous bubble trap. After preliminary evaluation of the data of 23 patients, the study was terminated prior to study completion. The quantity and volume of GME were significantly lower in patients perfused with a venous bubble trap compared to patients perfused without a venous bubble trap. The present study demonstrates that a MECC system with a venous bubble trap significantly reduces the volume of GME and strongly reduces the quantity of large GME (>500 µm). Therefore, the use of a venous bubble trap in a MECC system is warranted.

Minimal Extracorporeal Circulation Circuit Standby for “Off-Pump” Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation

We propose, as an addition to the off-pump technique for implantation of an axial flow left ventricular assist device, the use of a minimal extracorporeal circuit for circulatory support, in the setting of hemodynamic instability during implantation. Thus, the use of conventional cardiopulmonary bypass could be avoided. This set-up provides simplicity and effectiveness and enhanced safety of the off-pump implantation while it may offer adequate circulatory support if required.

Minimizing Cardiopulmonary Bypass Attenuates Myocardial Damage After Cardiac Surgery

The standard heart-lung machine is deemed a major trigger of systemic inflammatory reactions, potentially inducing organ failure. The strict reduction of blood-artificial surface and blood-air contact might represent meaningful improvements of the extracorporeal technology with respect to organ preservation. In this study, we assessed perioperative myocardial damage by using a novel minimal extracorporeal circuit (MECC) and a conventional cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) system. Sixty patients scheduled for coronary artery bypass surgery were randomly assigned to either the MECC or the standard CPB system. Myocardial markers were determined by specific immunoassays 6, 12, and 24 hours after CPB initiation. Results were corrected for hemodilution.Demographics, hemodynamics, the number of anastomoses, CPB, and cross-clamp time were comparable between the groups. MECC patients demonstrated significantly lower levels of Troponin T (ng/ml) at 6, 12, and 24 hours (0.07 +/- 0.01 vs. 0.16 +/- 0.04, p < 0.005; 0.12 +/- 0.03 vs. 0.28 +/- 0.08, p < 0.008; 0.21 +/- 0.05 vs. 0.35 +/- 0.09, p < 0.03, respectively) and creatine kinase-MB (U/l) at 6 and 12 hours (22.5 +/- 1.5 vs. 40.6 +/- 3.3, p < 0.0001; 23.3 +/- 3.4 vs. 40.8 +/- 8.0, p < 0.001, respectively). Creatine kinase-MB at 24 hours tended to lower values in the MECC group but did not quite reach statistical significance. The MECC system may not only provide a less invasive solution to meet the requirements during cardiac surgery but also a more organ-preserving alternative to standard CPB.