Minimal Access Thyroid Surgery Research Articles

Feasibility of using minimal incision in thyroidectomy operation

Background: The conventional technique of thyroidectomy requires long skin incision, not satisfying patient and surgeon in terms of cosmesis and endoscopic thyroid surgery requires expertise. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes of patients undergoing minimal-incision thyroidectomy with those undergoing conventional thyroidectomy for benign thyroid diseases.Methods: Prospective randomized study that was carried on 50 patients who were undergone thyroidectomy at the department of surgery-Menoufia University from June 2018 to June 2019. The patients were divided into two groups. Group A included 25 patients who were operated upon using minimal incision thyroidectomy technique and group B included 25 patients who were undergone traditional thyroidectomy incision.Results: The length of skin incision was significantly shorter in the minimal-incision thyroidectomy than that in the conventional thyroidectomy group. Operative time was shorter in minimal incision technique. The incidence of postoperative complications was higher in conventional thyroidectomy group but didn’t reach to significant level. Patients undergone minimal-incision thyroidectomy experienced significantly less postoperative pain and were more satisfied with the cosmetic result than patients who underwent conventional thyroidectomy.Conclusions: Thyroid surgery can safely be performed as a minimally invasive procedure. Minimal access thyroid surgery is therefore a feasible and safe option for selected patients with excellent cosmetic outcome, with minimal learning curve.

Proper handling of the pyramidal lobe in minimal access thyroid procedures.

The thyroid gland is a butterfly-shaped gland located in the lower part of the anterior surface of the neck between the fifth cervical and the first thoracic vertebra. Usually, it consists of two lateral, almost symmetrical lobes, the connective isthmus and the pyramidal lobe. The pyramidal lobe is a conical or cylindrical projection of the gland's parenchyma that extends superiorly to the thyroid cartilage or the hyoid bone. Most often, it originates from the isthmus and it is located to the left of the middle line. It can be absent in up to 50% of the cases. From the time of Theodor Kocher who performed the first classic thyroidectomies, we are now entering the era of minimal access thyroid surgery where new techniques are devised in order to provide a better cosmetic result. The presence of the pyramidal lobe is a classic example of an anatomic variation of the thyroid gland that plays an important role in the completeness of a total thyroidectomy, especially when the procedure is carried out for an autoimmune or malignant disease. The pyramidal lobe can also increase the complexity of minimal access procedures that are nowadays applied for the removal of the thyroid gland. The purpose of this article is to outline the importance of the pyramidal lobe in minimal access thyroid surgery.

Minimal Access Thyroid Surgery in Children: A Retrospective Study and Literature Review

Minimal access thyroid surgery (MATS) is a technique whereby a part of or whole of a thyroid lobe is removed through a small (3–4 cm) neck incision. Its use in the surgical management of thyroid disease in children has not been well elucidated. We present a retrospective case study of 12 patients over the period of 2007 to 2010 to assess the feasibility of MATS in the management of thyroid disease. Minimal access thyroid surgery is a safe and feasible approach for hemithyroidectomy/lobectomy in selected patients. There were no associated adverse events, complications or disease recurrence. We also reviewed the literature and discussed the use of MATS as a routine procedure in selected pediatric patients.

Minimally Invasive Video-Assisted Thyroidectomy (MIVAT) in the Era of Minimal Access Thyroid Surgery

Background: In the era of minimal access thyroid surgery, the terms minimal access and minimally invasive are often used interchangeably and in most instances this is far from being accurate. The aim of this article is to examine the characteristics and potential of one of the first minimal access thyroid procedures described; minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy (MIVAT). Methods: The purpose of this article was obtained by almost two decades of experiences with the procedure at the authors’ center, and a systemic literature review was undertaken of all available medical literature to evaluate available literature by conducting a PubMed search limited to articles originally written in English language between the years 1997 and 2016. The search was limited by using the terms: minimally invasive thyroid surgery, video-assisted, endoscopic, and robotic thyroidectomy. The procedure’s design, radicality and safety, learning curve, cost, advantages and disadvantages were addressed. MIVAT’s potential as a surgical tool for thyroid pathology was also addressed by evaluating its indications, contraindications, and limitations. Results: MIVAT is a gasless hybrid procedure that is comparable to conventional thyroidectomy (CT) in terms of radicality and safety, with the added advantage of reduced early postoperative voice and swallowing symptoms. MIVAT has a relatively rapid learning curve with an additional advantage over other minimal access procedures; the ability of being adopted by the low-volume surgeon at a cost and time comparable to CT, but with improved patient satisfaction. Furthermore, it is non-inferior to procedures free of a neck scar in terms of patient satisfaction. MIVAT’s main drawback is that it is limited by its strict selection criteria. It is a viable treatment option for all types of thyroid pathologies. However, its role in therapeutic neck dissection remains to be validated. Conclusions: MIVAT is a safe and effective procedure which is obviously described in its name “minimally invasive”. It seems that in the era of innovative technologies and scarless-in-the neck thyroid surgery, MIVAT is here to stay.

Minimal access thyroid surgery – a new dawn?

Minimal access thyroid surgery – a new dawn?

Bilateral transaxillary endoscopic total thyroidectomy

Minimal-access thyroid surgery using various techniques is well described. The present study reviews our initial experience with total thyroidectomy using a robotic-assisted bilateral transaxillary endoscopic approach (R-BAEA) and a non-robotic-assisted bilateral transaxillary endoscopic approach (BAEA) to assess it's safety and feasibility. The study group was 13 consecutive patients who were candidates for total thyroidectomy with benign thyroid disease. Two young adult patients who were older than 20 years and 2 teenage patients who underwent a transaxillary endoscopic thyroid lobectomy were excluded from this study that was composed of 9 children. A detailed description of the surgical technique is provided. Eight patients were female and one was male. The mean age was 13.5 +/- 3.0 years. Two R-BAEAs and 7 BAEAs were performed. The initial diagnosis was Graves disease in all 9 cases. The mean operating time was 385 minutes (range, 364-407 minutes) for R-BAEA and 259 minutes (range, 135-385 minutes) for BAEA. The mean diameter of the resected specimens was 5.9 cm (range, 4.5-8.3 cm); the mean intraoperative blood loss was 15.0 mL (range, 10-30 mL). The recurrent laryngeal nerve and parathyroid glands were identified and preserved intact in all cases. No patients required conversion. There was one instance of postoperative wound erythema, and 2 patients experienced hypocalcemia that resolved spontaneously. Two patients with large glands experienced a transient postoperative hoarseness. The mean total postoperative morphine dose administered in the first 24 hours was 1.5 mg (range, 0-4 mg). Postoperative pain was minimal, and cosmetic results were considered excellent by all patients. All except one were discharged the day after surgery and returned immediately to normal activities. Total thyroidectomy using BAEA with or without robotic assistance is feasible and safe. The advantages of this approach are no cervical scar, no significant morbidity, less postoperative pain, and early return to normal activity compared with other published techniques.

Laryngeal Nerve Monitoring and Minimally Invasive Thyroid Surgery

To determine the feasibility of the combined use of laryngeal nerve monitoring and minimally invasive thyroid surgery. Prospective, nonrandomized analysis of single-surgeon experience. Academic institution. Consecutive series of patients undergoing both minimally invasive thyroid surgery and laryngeal nerve monitoring. Incision length and incidence of temporary or permanent laryngeal nerve injury. Two hundred eighty-three patients underwent thyroid surgery at the Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, between January 2004 and November 2006. Some type of minimal-access approach (endoscopic or nonendoscopic) was used in 137 cases (48.4%) in which general anesthesia was administered. Laryngeal nerve monitoring was performed in 73 (53.3%) of these 137 cases, although the proportion of cases in which it was performed increased significantly from 8.7% (2 of 23 cases) in 2004 to 95.2% (58 of 61 cases) in 2006 (P < .001). There were no cases of permanent nerve injury. The incidence of temporary recurrent laryngeal nerve paresis was 4.3% (4 of 92 nerves at risk) in the cases in which laryngeal nerve monitoring was used and 6.0% (5 of 84 nerves at risk) in the cases in which the nerve was visually identified without use of a monitor. This difference failed to reach statistical significance (P = .73), which may reflect an insufficient sample size. Monitoring of the laryngeal nerves is feasible in minimal-access thyroid surgery and may serve as a meaningful adjunct to the visual identification of nerves.

Minimally invasive nonendoscopic thyroidectomy

Minimal-access thyroid surgery, using various techniques, is increasingly being reported. The present study reviews our experience with thyroid surgery using a minimally invasive approach (MIT). Between October 2002 and December 2004, a prospective nonrandomized study of patients undergoing thyroid surgery was performed to evaluate the variables that might condition the indications to minimally invasive nonendoscopic approach. 296 patients underwent thyroid surgery; 46 of these were eligible for MIT through a 2.5- to 3-cm incision. There was one case of transient inferior laryngeal nerve palsy and no postoperative definitive hypoparathyroidism. MIT was converted to conventional thyroidectomy only in two cases. Cosmetic results were considered excellent by all patients. Minimal-access thyroid surgery is a safe and feasible alternative to conventional thyroid surgery in selected cases. The advantage that this technique offers, in addition to low morbidity, is an improved cosmetic result.

Ultrasonic Technology Facilitates Minimal Access Thyroid Surgery

Options for controlling the vasculature during thyroid surgery include suture ligatures, vessel clips, and bipolar cautery. Ultrasonic technology represents an alternative to conventional techniques in which the vessels are simultaneously sealed and divided. We sought to determine the safety and efficacy of thyroidectomy with ultrasonic technology. Nonrandomized, prospective analysis of a series of patients undergoing thyroidectomy at the Medical College of Georgia. The records of 51 consecutive patients who underwent thyroid surgery between December 2004 and June 2005 were reviewed. Patients in whom ultrasonic technology (Harmonic-ACE, Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Cincinnati, OH) was used comprised the study population. Forty-four of 51 patients underwent thyroidectomy with the assistance of ultrasonic technology. There were 4 males and 40 females with a mean age of 43.5 +/- 15.8 years. Twenty-two patients had a total thyroidectomy, 18 underwent unilateral lobectomy, and 4 underwent completion thyroidectomy. The overall mean incision length was 5.0 +/- 2.6 (range 2-12) cm. A subgroup of patients underwent minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy (n = 13) and had a mean incision length of 29.3 +/- 0.8 mm. There were no cases of permanent injury to the recurrent laryngeal nerve and no cases of persistent hypoparathyroidism. Blood loss ranged from 5 mL to 100 mL, with a mean of 26.7 +/- 21.8 mL. Ultrasonic technology facilitates thyroid surgery, particularly when a minimally invasive approach is undertaken. It reliably seals and divides the thyroid vasculature and will likely replace other methods of managing the thyroid blood supply.

COMPLETION THYROIDECTOMY FOR MALIGNANCY AFTER INITIAL MINIMAL ACCESS THYROID SURGERY

Minimal access thyroid surgery (MATS), carried out through a lateral 2.5-cm incision, provides excellent clinical and cosmetic outcomes when carried out for small (<3 cm), single nodules. However, if the final pathology shows thyroid malignancy and a completion thyroidectomy is required, the small lateral incision requires conversion to a standard collar incision and the second operation must be carried out in the presence of previous lateral dissection. The aim of this study is to determine if there is any demonstrable disadvantage to completion thyroidectomy for malignancy after MATS when compared with the same procedure after conventional hemithyroidectomy. This retrospective cohort study examined all patients undergoing completion thyroidectomy for malignancy in the University of Sydney Endocrine Surgical Unit from January 2002 to January 2005. Outcome measures were complication rates, final scar length and patient's self-assessment of scar appearance. A total of 106 patients underwent MATS during the study period, 11 of whom required completion thyroidectomy for malignancy. During the same period, 42 patients required completion thyroidectomy for malignancy after previous conventional hemithyroidectomy. There was no difference in complication rates between the two groups. The two complications in the study consisted of one case of flap oedema (control) and one case of keloid scar (MATS). Mean final incision length, scar appearance and patient's satisfaction with scar did not differ between the two groups. There is no demonstrable disadvantage when completion thyroidectomy for malignancy is required after MATS.

Minimally Invasive Thyroidectomy: Basic and Advanced Techniques

Minimal access surgery in the thyroid compartment has evolved considerably over the past 10 years and now takes many forms. We advocate at least two distinct approaches, depending on the disease process and multiple patient factors. The technical aspects are explored in depth with liberal use of videographic demonstration. The authors conducted a comparison of two distinct surgical techniques with photographic and videographic documentation of two distinct minimal access approaches to the thyroid compartment termed minimally invasive thyroidectomy (MITh) and minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy (MIVAT). Both historic and previously unpublished data (age, gender, pathology, incision length, and complications) are systematically analyzed. Patients who underwent minimally invasive thyroidectomy (n = 31) had a mean age of 39.4 +/- 10.7 years; seven were male and 24 were female. The most common diagnosis was follicular or Hürthle cell adenoma (29%), followed by papillary or follicular cancer (26%). The mean incision length was 4.9 +/- 1.0 cm. One patient developed a hypertrophic scar and one patient developed thrombophlebitis of the anterior jugular vein. There were 14 patients in the MIVAT group with a mean age of 43.7 +/- 11.4 years; one was male and 13 were female. The majority of patients had follicular adenoma (42.9%) or papillary carcinoma (21.4%) as their primary diagnosis. The mean incision length was 25 +/- 4.3 mm (range, 20-30 mm), and there were no complications. Two distinct approaches to minimal access thyroid surgery are now available. The choice of approach depends on a number of patient and disease factors. Careful patient selection will result in continued safe and satisfactory performance of minimally invasive thyroid surgery.

Safety and feasibility of thyroid lobectomy via a lateral 2.5-cm incision with a cohort comparison of the first 50 cases: evolution of a surgical approach

Over 500 minimal-access parathyroidectomies (MIPs) have been performed in our unit, and, from these, a technique for thyroid resection has evolved. We present a report on the evolution of minimal-access thyroid surgery (MATS) and compare the results with those from a cohort of patients operated on prior to the use of MATS. We reviewed the evolution towards the MATS technique. The results of the MATS procedures were compared with those from an equal number of consecutive patients undergoing conventional lobectomy prior to the use of MATS. Fifty patients (mean age 45.6 years) underwent MATS between March 2002 and May 2004. The mean nodule diameter was 18.5 mm. In the MATS group there was one recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) injury, two temporary RLN neuropraxias, which recovered, and one haematoma. The control group (mean age 47.9 years) had a mean nodule size of 22 mm. In the controls there was one temporary RLN neuropraxia, which recovered, and two haematomas-P>0.05 (Fisher's exact test) for all the complications. MATS has evolved from an experimental approach into a safe and feasible surgical procedure based on the same operative approach as used for MIP. It provides an alternative to open thyroid surgery in appropriately selected cases.

Minimal access thyroid surgery: technique and report of the first 25 cases.

Minimal access thyroid surgery, using various techniques, is increasingly being reported. The present study reviews our experience with thyroid surgery using a lateral focused mini-incision approach, and assesses its safety and feasibility. The study group comprised all patients undergoing minimal access thyroid surgery (MATS) during the period May 2002-May 2003. Data were prospectively gathered, including patient demographics, indication for surgery, operation performed, nodule size, final pathology, and complications. Exclusion criteria for this procedure included: family history of thyroid cancer, previous neck irradiation or surgery, carcinoma on fine needle aspiration, presence of significant thyroiditis, multinodular goitre, and nodule size >3 cm. The operation was carried out through a 2.5-cm lateral incision placed directly over the nodule, with exposure gained by dissecting the plane between the sternomastoid muscle and the lateral edge of the strap muscles. Twenty-five patients underwent MATS, 22 women and three men. Nineteen patients underwent hemithyroidectomy, five underwent isthmectomy, and one underwent local nodule excision. The average measured incision size was 2.63 cm at the end of the procedure. The average nodule size was 2.2 cm, and the average thyroid lobe resected measured 4.7 cm in maximal length. Final pathology revealed benign nodules in 21 patients and four thyroid cancers (two follicular and two papillary). There was one wound infection and two patients had temporary recurrent laryngeal nerve neuropraxia. Minimal access thyroid surgery is a safe and feasible alternative to open thyroid surgery in selected cases.

Minimal access thyroid surgery: is it feasible, is it appropriate?

Reports of minimal access thyroid surgery (MATS) using various techniques have recently appeared. This study examined the feasibility of MATS using either a lateral 'focused' or endoscopically assisted approach. The study group comprised all patients undergoing minimally invasive parathyroidectomy (MIP) during the period May 1998 to April 2002 in whom a concomitant thyroid procedure was undertaken. All procedures were performed either through a 2-cm lateral cervical incision (n = 19) or endoscopically (n = 7). Twenty-six patients underwent thyroid surgery, consisting of either local excision of a thyroid nodule (n = 25) or hemi-thyroidectomy (n = 1). In 13 patients the nodule was incidentally discovered, in four patients removal of the parathyroid necessitated partial thyroidectomy, and in nine patients the lesion identified by preoperative parathyroid localization proved to be a thyroid nodule. There were no permanent complications in the study group. Two patients required drainage of a haematoma. The final pathology of all 26 cases revealed benign nodular thyroid disease. Thyroid surgery can safely be performed as a minimally invasive procedure. Minimal access thyroid surgery is therefore a feasible option for selected patients. The question remains to be answered as to whether this surgical approach is appropriate treatment for nodular thyroid disease.