Military armored vehicles are specially designed and equipped for defense and security activities. During military operations, the right vehicle selection is of vital importance for the success of the operation. This problem examined 5 different alternative military armored vehicles for operational and logistic success using the criteria Engine Power, Dimensions, Fire Power Range, Gradeability, and Armor Thickness. In military decision problems, some alternatives probably need to be evaluated regarding more than one conflicting criterion. The decision among these alternatives will usually involve other strategic-level decisions. Multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) refers to making decisions in such a situation. Are there any methods and techniques available to solve MCDM problems? The evaluation according to distance from average solution (EDAS) method is a multi-criteria decision-making method whose effectiveness has been tested in other problem areas in the literature. In this study, we use the EDAS method to address the problem of military armored vehicle selection in a fuzzy environment. While a Type-1 fuzzy set is used in the fuzzy EDAS method, trapezoidal fuzzy numbers are preferred for military expert evaluation. The results of this study show that the fuzzy EDAS method is effective.
Read full abstract