Military Orthopaedic Research Articles

Do Fellowship-educated Military Orthopaedic Oncologists Who Practice in Military Settings Treat a Sufficient Volume of Patients to Maintain Their Oncologic Expertise?

Fellowship-trained orthopaedic oncologists in the US military provide routine clinical care and also must maintain readiness to provide combat casualty care. However, low oncologic procedure volume may hinder the ability of these surgeons to maintain relevant surgical expertise. Other low-volume specialties within the Military Health System (MHS) have established partnerships with neighboring civilian centers to increase procedure volume, but the need for similar partnerships for orthopaedic oncologists has not been examined. The purpose of this study was to characterize the practice patterns of US military fellowship-trained orthopaedic oncologists. We asked the following questions: (1) What are the diagnoses treated by US military fellowship-trained orthopaedic oncologists? (2) What are the procedures performed by US military fellowship-trained orthopaedic oncologists? We queried the Military Data Repository, a centralized repository for healthcare data for all healthcare beneficiaries (active duty, dependents, and retirees) within the Defense Health Agency using the MHS's Management and Reporting Tool for all international common procedure taxonomy (CPT) codes and ICD-9 and ICD-10 codes associated with National Provider Identifier (NPI) numbers of active duty, military fellowship-trained orthopaedic oncologists. Fellowship-trained orthopaedic oncologists were identified by military specialty leaders. Then, we identified all procedures performed by the orthopaedic oncologist based on NPI numbers for fiscal years 2013 to 2022. We stratified the CPT codes by top orthopaedic procedure categories (such as amputation [performed for oncologic and nononcologic reasons], fracture, arthroplasty, oncologic) based on associated ICD codes. These were then tabulated by the most common diagnoses treated. Thirteen percent (796 of 5996) of the diagnoses were oncologic, of which 45% (357 of 796) were malignant. Forty-four percent (158 of 357) of the malignancies were primary and 56% (199 of 357) were secondary; this translates to an average of 2 patients with primary and 2.5 patients with secondary malignancies treated per surgeon per year. During the study period, nine orthopaedic oncologists performed 5996 orthopaedic procedures, or 74 procedures per surgeon per year. Twenty-one percent (1252 of 5996) of the procedures were oncologic; the remaining procedures included 897 arthroplasties, 502 fracture-related, 275 amputations for a nononcologic indication, 204 infections, 142 arthroscopic, and 2724 other procedures. Although military orthopaedic oncologists possess expert skills that are directly translatable to combat casualty care and operational readiness, within MHS hospitals they treat relatively few patients with oncologic diagnoses, and less than one-half of those involve malignancies. Despite postgraduation procedure volume raining stable over the last decade, it is unknown how many new patient visits for oncologic diagnoses and how many corresponding tumor procedures are necessary to maintain competence or build confidence after musculoskeletal oncology fellowship training. It is important to note that there are no military orthopaedic oncology fellowships, and all active duty orthopaedic oncologists undergo training at civilian institutions. Military-civilian partnerships with high-volume cancer centers may enable military orthopaedic oncologists to work at civilian cancer centers to increase their oncologic volume to ensure sustainment of operationally relevant knowledge, skills, and abilities and improve patient care and outcomes.

Treatment of Achilles tendon rupture in a patient with alkaptonuric ochronosis

The treatment result of a patient with spontaneous rupture of the Achilles tendon and features of diagnosing alkaptonuric ochronosis, a rare disease, are presented, providing doctors beneficial information for the prevention and/or delay of possible complications. On March 8, 2021, at about 20:50, while at his workplace, getting up from his chair from the table, patient K, 52 years old, felt a sharp pain in the lower third of his right shin and was urgently taken to the hospital. He was examined by a traumatologist and was initially diagnosed with rupture of the right Achilles tendon. His right lower limb was immobilized with a plaster splint. On March 11, 2021, he entered the military traumatology and orthopedics clinic of the Kirov Military Medical Academy for surgical treatment. Upon admission, the patient complained of pain in the right lower leg and impaired support function of the right lower limb. Based on complaints, medical history, laboratory results, and instrumental studies, subcutaneous rupture of the right Achilles tendon was diagnosed. On March 12, 2021, anchor suture of the right Achilles tendon was performed. Anesthesia — combined, access: two separate incisions on the posterior surface of the lower third of the right leg and in the area of the calcaneal tubercle, each 5 cm long, intraoperatively revealed a complete subcutaneous rupture of the right Achilles tendon. Notably, the tendon was black in color when cut. The postoperative period proceeded without complications, and postoperative wounds of linear shape in the right Achilles tendon healed by primary intention. No signs of disturbances were observed in peripheral circulation and innervation of the right lower limb. To confirm the diagnosis, a simple laboratory test was performed: a change in the color of urine during the day, after its additional alkalization. The color change is due to the polymerization of homogentisic acid, which is excreted in large quantities in the urine. To verify the diagnosis, a molecular genetic technique was performed: sequencing of the clinically significant HGD gene and encoding the enzyme homogentisate-1,2-dioxygenase, which are mutations that lead to alkaptonuria. The analysis results confirmed the presence of an amino acid substitution at the pGLy161Arg position, indicating pathogenicity. The use of simple methods of additional laboratory diagnostics and molecular genetic analysis enabled the diagnosis of alkaptonuric ochronosis. Thus, characteristic diagnostic signs were damage to the Achilles tendon in combination with the obtained anamnestic, clinical, and laboratory data of alkaptonuria.

Musculoskeletal complaints and its economic impact in an Iranian army hospital

AimMusculoskeletal conditions constitute a remarkable portion of disability cases in the military. This study evaluated the distribution and types of musculoskeletal problems and estimated the direct and indirect costs due to these complaints in an Iranian military hospital.MethodsAll medical records of patients with musculoskeletal complaints that were referred to the medical committee of a military hospital, including rheumatology, orthopedics, and neuro-surgical specialists, from 2014 to 2016, were reviewed. Details of each complaint and the final opinion of the medical committees were recorded. The cost of each diagnostic step was calculated based on the recorded data. The treatment costs were estimated for each complaint by calculating the average cost of treatment plans suggested by two specialists, a physical medicine and a rheumatologist. The estimated cost for each part is calculated based on the army insurance low. Indirect costs due to absences, inability to work, and disability were assessed and added to the above-mentioned direct costs. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 21.Results2,116 medical records of the committee were reviewed. 1252 (59.16%) cases were soldiers (who had to spend two years of mandatory duty in the army), and 864 (40.83%) cases were non-soldiers. The three most common complaints were fractures (301 cases, 14.22%), low back pain due to lumbar disc bulges and herniations (303 cases, 14.31%), and genu varus/genu valgus (257 cases, 12.14%). The most affected sites were the lower limbs and vertebral column. According to an official document in these subjects’ records, 4120 person-days absent from work were estimated annually, and nearly $1,172,149 of annual economic impact was calculated.ConclusionMusculoskeletal problems are common in the army, and establishing preventive strategies for these conditions is essential. The conservative and medical approach and the proper education for correct movement and the situation should be mentioned for the reduction of disability and its economic burden on the army’s staff.

Implementation of a Hand Training Curriculum in Junior Resident Education: Experience at a Military Orthopedic Residency Program

The American Society for Surgery of the Hand developed the Surgery Training and Educational Platform (STEP) in order to assess essential skills in hand surgery. The American Society for Surgery of the Hand designed modules spanning both osseous and soft tissue skills aimed to be cost effective for the purpose of orthopedic surgical education. The STEP curriculum was adapted and implemented at a single military orthopedic residency program. The following six modules were implemented: (1) depth of plunge, (2) scaphoid pinning, (3) phalangeal fracture pinning, (4) microsurgery, (5) full-thickness skin graft harvest, and (6) wrist arthroscopy. Both first- (PGY1) and second-year (PGY2) residents participated. Scores were calculated according to the original STEP curriculum criteria and were compared with historic data from the previous year. All residents responded to an evaluation questionnaire following the performance of the tasks. The PGY2 cohort outperformed PGY1 cohorts across all modules except for the depth of plunge and scaphoid fixation modules. In the phalangeal pinning module, PGY2s did significantly better when compared with pooled PGY1 performance and their own PGY1 performance (P < .05). In the microsurgery module, PGY2s scored better than pooled PGY1s. In the full-thickness skin grafting module, PGY2s outperformed PGY1s (P < .05). On the post-task evaluation, residents unanimously responded that this was a valuable exercise, but the time required to complete all the modules was significant, similar to that of the previous year survey. The STEP simulation is a cost effective and reliable program to engage residents in hand surgery-related skills. However, adaptations should be encouraged according to institutional resources to provide the most inclusive training platform possible per institutional constraints. The STEP simulation is interpreted by residents as a valuable exercise but requires a significant time commitment that could be a barrier to implementation and regular use. Therapeutic IV.

Consensus and Equipose in the Management of Military Trainee Femoral Neck Stress Fractures: A Survey of Military Surgeons.

Femoral neck stress fractures (FNSFs) are a unique injury pattern not commonly treated in the civilian trauma population; however, it is particularly high with military trainees engaged in basic combat training. To date, no study has surveyed a population of military orthopedic surgeons on treatment preferences for military service members (SMs) with FNSF. We aim to evaluate the extent of clinical equipoise that exists in the management of these injuries, hypothesizing that there would be consensus in the factors dictating surgical and non-surgical intervention for FNSF. A 27-question survey was created and sent to U.S. military orthopedic surgeon members of the Society of Military Orthopaedic Surgeons. The survey was designed in order to gather the experience among surgeons in treating FNSF and identifying variables that play a role in the treatment algorithm for these patients. In addition, seven detailed, clinical vignettes were presented to further inquire on surgeon treatment preferences. Binomial distribution analysis was used to evaluate for common trends within the surgeon's treatment preferences. Seventy orthopedic surgeons completed the survey, the majority of whom were on active duty status in the U.S. Military (82.86%) and having under 5 years of experience (61.43%). Majority of surgeons elected for a multiple screw construct (92.86%), however the orientation of the multiple screws was dependent on whether the fracture was open or closed. Management for compression-sided FNSF involving ≥50% of the femoral neck width, tension-sided FNSF, and stress fractures demonstrating fracture line progression had consensus for operative management. Respondents agreed upon prophylactic fixation of the contralateral hip if the following factors were involved: Complete fracture (98.57%), compression-sided fracture line >75% (88.57%), compression-sided fracture line >50-75% with hip effusion (88.57%), contralateral tension-sided fracture (87.14%), and compression-sided fracture line >50-75% (84.29%). An FNSF < 50% on the contralateral femoral neck or a hip effusion was indeterminate in surgeons indicating need for prophylactic fixation. Majority of surgeons (77.1%) utilized restricted toe-touch weight-bearing for postoperative mobility restrictions. Consensus exists for surgical and non-surgical management of FNSF by U.S. military orthopedic surgeons, despite the preponderance of surgeons reporting a low annual volume of FNSF cases treated. However, there are certain aspects in the operative and non-operative management of FNSF that are unanimously adhered to. Specifically, our results demonstrate that there is no clear indication on the management of FNSF when an associated hip effusion is involved. Additionally, the indications for surgically treating contralateral FNSF are unclear. IV.

What's Important: Reflections from the 2022 Society of Military Orthopaedic Surgeons (SOMOS) E. Anthony Rankin Scholars.

Ojo, Desiree E. MPH, MPA1,a; Whyte, Morgan BS2; Walker, Jasmine BBA3; Chibueze, Joseph BS4; Akande, Benjamin BS5; Gonzalez, Yamilet MS6; Dingle, Marvin MD7 Author Information

Pipeline to Military Orthopaedic Leadership: 20 Years of Race and Gender Diversity Trends Within Military Orthopaedic Surgery Fellowship Training.

The lack of trainees from underrepresented race and gender backgrounds in orthopaedic surgery fellowship training has been well reported in the literature. The purpose of this study was to investigate the demographic trends of federally sponsored military orthopaedic surgery fellows in the Army, Navy, and Air Force. We hypothesize that there has been an increase in women selected for fellowship but that there has been no change in the race demographics of military fellows over the past 2 decades. A retrospective review of all available demographic data collected by the Army, Air Force, and Navy since the beginning of tracking federally funded fellowship training in orthopaedic surgery was completed (1998-2021). Data were grouped into 4-year periods for analysis to closely mirror the military assignment cycle. Three hundred sixty-two military orthopaedic surgery fellowship board selectees were included in our analysis. The proportion of women fellows increased from 3% (n = 2/69) over 2001 to 2004 to 21% (n = 17/82) during 2017 to 2020 (p < 0.05). Fellows who identified as White comprised 82% (n = 297) of the cohort during the study period. Individuals who identified as Asian were the next highest proportion of fellows at 4% (n = 16), followed by Black (n = 14, 4%) and Hispanic (n = 13, 3%). Individuals who identified as Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander represented 1% (n = 3), and an additional 6% (n = 20) fellows identified as "other" or "undeclared." Over the 20-year study period, representation of Asian, Black, Native Hawaiian, and Hispanic fellows did not increase (p = 0.79, 0.81, 0.45, 0.34, respectively). Within military orthopaedics, there has been increased representation of women in fellowship training over the past 20 years. However, the proportion of fellows from underrepresented racial and ethnic groups has remained stagnant. One barrier to improving gender and race representation is the currently imprecise and inconsistent collection of demographic information. Importantly, fellowship training has a direct effect on future leadership opportunities within the military orthopaedic surgery community. A more diverse leadership may help to inspire future generations of military orthopaedic surgeons. IV.

Racial and Gender Diversity of Physicians Accepted to American Military Orthopaedic and Surgical Residencies: An 18-Year Analysis.

We performed a retrospective cohort study evaluating matriculation into first year of residency training in US military surgical training programs between 2002 and 2020. In total, 9,124 applicants were reviewed. We collected matriculant self-reported race/ethnicity and sex and the medical/specialty program. We considered under-represented minorities as those who reported their race as African American, Indian/Alaskan Native, and Native, other, or who reported ethnicity as Hispanic. We calculated changes in persons accepted to training positions over time and used linear regression to model trends in diversity among orthopaedic matriculating residents when compared with other surgical subspecialities over time. Across all surgical subspecialities, the average change in percent women was 0.94% per year for the study period (p < 0.01). The average annual percent women entering orthopaedic surgery residency programs was 14% for the 18-year study period. Across all surgical subspecialties, the average change for accepted applicants from groups underrepresented in medicine (URiM) was 1.01% per year for the study period (p < 0.01). The average annual percent URiM entering orthopaedic surgery residency programs was 17% for the 18-year study period. The annual change of women and URiM entering military orthopaedic residencies was 0.10% and 1.52%, respectively. Despite statistically significant improvements, recruitment efforts as used to date fall far short of reversing sexual, racial, and ethnic disparities in military orthopaedic residencies. Orthopaedics has a lower representation of both women and physicians with minority backgrounds when compared with many surgical subspecialties. Additional interventions are still necessary to increase diversity for military orthopaedic surgeons.

Allogeneic osteoplastic materials for reconstructive surgery of combat injuries

The number of operations with the use of osteoplastic materials is increasing annually, which is explained by the increasing number of high-tech operations, reconstructive interventions for bone pathology, oncoorthopedics, bone deformities, as well as tissue defects resulting from combat trauma. Bone as an object of transplantation and is preferable because the use of bone tissue and materials made on its basis creates the necessary conditions for biological restoration of bone as an organ.&#x0D; The modern trend is the development of regenerative medicine technologies and the development of modified materials with improved and predetermined properties osteoplastic materials ceased to be static structures and their inertness gave way to functional activity.&#x0D; The article describes the basic advantages of bone tissue and allogenic osteoplastic materials for their prospective use in reconstructive and reconstructive surgery of the musculoskeletal system. Data on the experience in the use of donor bone tissues for homoplasy at the clinic of military traumatology and orthopedics of the Kirov Military Medical Academy are presented. The advantages of allogeneic decellularized tissues for use in clinical and scientific practice are considered. The importance of preserving the architecture of native tissue for successful bone transplantation is shown. Decellularization is a method that allows the removal of immunogenic agents from tissues and organs, including cells and residual DNA, preserving the natural composition and architecture of the extracellular matrix for the most effective use of allogeneic bone tissue. The use of decellularized allogenic bone tissue purified to a mineral-collagen matrix or demineralized is the most practical option among other osteoplastic materials when large bone fragments need to be replaced.

Foundation and development of the oldest orthopedic department and clinic of Russia

Issues of the foundation and development of scientific schools, medical specialties, departments, and clinics of the Military Medical Academy of S.M. Kirov, as well as their succession, remain largely debatable to this day. Moreover, their study appears to be extremely interesting when understanding the processes underlying the differentiation of the fundamental sections of medicine, formation of new areas of surgery, and their evolution to the state of independent surgical specialties. Several archival documents, reports, historical essays on the departments of desmurgy and mechanurgy, orthopedics, military field surgery, desmurgy and orthopedics, orthopedics and traumatology, and traumatology and orthopedics are analyzed. The origins of the formation and stages of transformation of the modern department of military traumatology and orthopedics are traced. Scientific orthopedics in Russia was started at the end of the 18th century in the bowels of the fundamental surgical departments of the Imperial Medical and Surgical Academy. On March 7, 1836, by the resolution of the conference of the Academy, the Department of Surgery was divided into the Department of General and Private Surgery with theoretical oculistics and the Department of Operative Surgery and Oculistics, Desmurgy and Mechanurgy, and Surgery on troupes. On February 20, 1888, an independent department of desmurgy and mechanurgy was established at the Academy. On March 24, 1900 (April 6, O.S.), based on Order No. 301 of the Minister of War of October 29, 1899, the Academy Conference decided to create the Orthopedic Clinic headed by Professor G.I. Turner, and the date mentioned went down in history as the birthday of the first orthopedic chair and clinic in Russia. From August 21, 1924, to August 8, 1931, it was renamed the Department of Military Field Surgery, Desmurgy and Orthopedics (Order no. 205 of August 9, 1924, by the Military Sanitary Department), and the reading of this subject was assigned to the senior assistant of the department E.Yu. Osten-Sacken who prepared the corresponding programs. From August 8, 1931, the department and the clinic reverted to their former name the Department and Clinic of Orthopedics, and Professor V.A. Oppel headed already an independent, established based on the Decree of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics Revolutionary Military Council of April 2, 1931, the Department of Military Field Surgery. In 1955, the Department of Orthopedics was renamed the Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology (Directive of the Chief of Staff of the Army No. OSN 5/1367869 of November 28, 1955), and in 1960, due to the pronounced traumatological orientation in educational and clinical work, to the Department of Traumatology and Orthopedics (Directive of the Chief of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics Defense Ministry No. ST/2/711247 of June 4, 1960). In 1974 the department was renamed Military Traumatology and Orthopedics Department (Directive No. 158/0267 of the Headquarters of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics Armed Forces Rear No. 158/0267 of February 15, 1974). Based on the analysis, it appears reasonable to offer readers a view of the prehistory of the origin, continuity, and development of the specialty traumatology and orthopedics at the Military Medical Academy of S.M. Kirov.

All MCIDs Are Wrong, But Some May be Useful.

To demonstrate how to apply a baseline-adjusted receiver operator characteristic curve (AROC) analysis for minimum clinically important differences (MCIDs) in an empirical data set and discuss new insights relating to MCIDs. Retrospective study. This study includes data from 999 active-duty military service patients enrolled in the United States Military Health System's Military Orthopedics Tracking Injuries and Outcomes Network. Anchored MCIDs were calculated using the standard receiver operator characteristic analysis and the AROC analysis for the Patient-Reported Outcome Measure Information System (PROMIS) Pain Interference and Defense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS). Point estimates where confidence intervals (CIs) crossed the 0.5 identity line on the area-under-the-curve (AUC) analysis were considered statistically invalid. MCID estimates where CIs crossed 0 were considered theoretically invalid. In applying an AROC analysis, the region of AUC and MCID validity for the PROMIS Pain Interference score exists when the baseline score is greater than 61.0 but less than 72.3. For DVPRS, the region of MCID validity is when the baseline score is greater than 5.9 but less than 7.9. Baseline values influence not only the MCID but also the accuracy of the MCID. MCIDs are statistically and theoretically valid for only a discrete range of baseline scores. Our findings suggest that the MCID may be too flawed a construct to accurately benchmark treatment outcomes. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2022;52(6):401-407. doi:10.2519/jospt.2022.11193.

Ascertaining the Readiness of Military Orthopedic Surgeons: A Revision to the Knowledge, Skills, and Abilities Methodology.

Decay of military surgeons' critical wartime skills is a persistent and growing concern among leaders in the military health system (MHS). The Knowledge, Skills and Abilities (KSA) Clinical Readiness Program was developed to quantify the readiness of clinicians in the MHS; however, the utility of the data is questionable due to a lack of focus on the operative expeditionary skillset in the original methodology. A revised methodology emphasizing the most relevant to expeditionary orthopedic surgery procedures is described. All Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes included in the original KSA methodology were reviewed and, if appropriate, removed, or reassigned to more suitable categories. Category scores were weighted to better align with the most performed procedures in the deployed environment. All surgical cases and procedures performed from 2017-2019 in military treatment facilities by orthopedic surgeons were recorded in total and by MHS market. Cases were recorded for all military orthopedic surgeons who performed at least one KSA credit procedure during the study period. The 10 MHS markets with the greatest number of procedures were included in the analysis. The change in creditable KSA procedure codes and procedures performed from the original to revised methodology was determined for each KSA category and MHS market. Overall, 403 CPT codes were recategorized and 79 were deleted from the original KSA methodology. The deletions represented less than 4% of the original creditable CPT codes, with most being supply or injection codes. Three of the five most common expeditionary KSA categories increased in the number of creditable procedure codes. The impact of the revision on the MHS markets was mixed, but the overall volume of credited procedures decreased. The weighted scoring did not disproportionately affect the analyzed markets. The revised methodology is better aligned with the most common procedures in the most recent large-scale military engagements. The improved applicability of the KSA scoring to necessary CWS will allow military medical leaders to better determine the readiness opportunities available in the MHS.

Billing and Coding Education and Knowledge Among Military Orthopaedic Surgeons

Objectives: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the current level of billing and coding knowledge among resident and staff military orthopaedic surgeons. Design: Prospective survey, training, and assessment. Setting: Academic Military Level 1 Trauma Center. Intervention: Voluntary, anonymous survey relating to practice setting, billing, and coding practices, type of residency training and prior education on the subject. A quiz consisting of 23 questions to assess billing and coding knowledge. Main outcome measurement: Survey results and quiz scores. Results and conclusions: We had 68 responses comprised of 23 residents and 45 staff orthopaedic surgeons. Among residents, 86.14% (20/23) reported that they code encounters yet only 17.39% (4/23) responded that they have had formal training on billing and coding. 91.30% (21/23) felt that this topic should be taught in residency training. Among staff surgeons, 93.33% (42/45) code their own encounters and 42.22% (19/45) reported formal training on billing and coding. 93.33% (42/45) of staff felt that billing and coding should be taught in residency. The average quiz scores among residents and staff were 43.48% and 58.36%, respectively (p&lt;0.0001). Scores among those with prior training in billing and coding were significantly higher overall (p= 0.033). Among staff there was no significant differences in scores related to years of experience, residency type, working with residents, years remaining in the military or participation in off-duty employment. Conclusion: There remains a paucity of formal training on billing and coding among military orthopaedic surgeons and this problem is not unique to military orthopaedic residency training programs. Those with formal training in billing and coding performed significantly better than those without, indicating that formal billing and coding training as part of graduate medical education may be effective in improving billing and coding knowledge among military orthopaedic surgeons. Level of Evidence: IV; survey Keywords: Billing, Coding, Medical education, Practice management.

The contribution of the scientific school of Professor V.N.Shevkunenko to military traumatology and orthopedics (to the 150th anniversary of his birth)

The contribution of the scientific school of Professor V.N.Shevkunenko to military traumatology and orthopedics (to the 150th anniversary of his birth)

Treatment outcomes of patients with knee hyaline cartilage damages using osteoperforative methods

BACKGROUND: The treatment of traumatic and degenerative cartilage damage is one of the largest areas in orthopedic practice, and the therapy success remains limited.&#x0D; AIM: To analyze the results of surgical treatment of patients with traumatic and degenerative injuries of the knee joint hyaline cartilage using debridement and osteoperforative techniques, taking into account the time from the surgical intervention.&#x0D; MATERIALS AND METHODS: A statistical analysis was conducted on the treatment outcomes of servicemen with traumatic and degenerative damage in the knee joint articular hyaline cartilage. Patients underwent surgical treatment using osteoperforative techniques (abrasive chondroplasty, tunneling, and microfracturing) at the Clinic of Military Traumatology and Orthopedics of the S.M. Kirov Military Medical Academy from 2009 to 2019. The study relied on the data obtained from questioning the patients using the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) and LKSS questionnaires.&#x0D; RESULTS: The result analyses using the KOOS and LKSS scales revealed significantly higher good results in the observed group in the postoperative period from 1 to 4 years than in the groups from 4 to 8 and more than 8 years (p = 0.004). No significant differences were determined in the treatment outcomes of the groups with resection and different osteoperforative methods.&#x0D; CONCLUSIONS: Treatment methods for hyaline cartilage defects, such as resection and osteoperforative, are technically simple with good treatment outcomes in patients with articular cartilage injuries from 1 to 4 years postoperative. Treatment outcome deterioration was noted in 48 years postoperative, regardless of the treatment method used, which is more significant in patients in 8 years postoperative.

Military Orthopedic Surgeons Are Not Just Traumatologists.

Each French military orthopedic surgeon is both an orthopedic surgeon and a trauma surgeon. Their mission is to support the armed forces in France and on deployment. The aim of this study was to describe the type of orthopedic surgery performed for the armed forces in France. Our hypothesis was that scheduled surgery was more common than trauma surgery. We conducted a retrospective descriptive analysis of the surgical activity for military patients in the orthopedic surgery departments of the four French military platform hospitals. All surgical procedures performed during 2020 were collected. We divided the procedures into the following categories: heavy and light trauma, posttraumatic reconstruction surgery, sports surgery, degenerative surgery, and specialized surgery. Our primary endpoint was the number of procedures performed per category. A total of 827 individuals underwent surgery, 91 of whom (11%) were medical returnees from deployment. The surgeries performed for the remaining 736 soldiers present in metropolitan France (89%) consisted of 181 (24.6%) trauma procedures (of which 86.7% were light trauma) and 555 (75.4%) scheduled surgery procedures (of which 60.8% were sports surgery). Among the medical returnees, there were 71 traumatology procedures (78%, of which 87.3% were light traumatology) and 20 procedures corresponding to surgery usually carried out on a scheduled basis (22%, of which 95% were sports surgery). Military orthopedic surgeons are not just traumatologists; their activity for the armed forces is varied and mainly consists of so-called programmed interventions.

CORR Insights®: Is Self-reported Return to Duty an Adequate Indicator of Return to Sport and/or Return to Function in Military Patients?

CORR Insights®: Is Self-reported Return to Duty an Adequate Indicator of Return to Sport and/or Return to Function in Military Patients?

Retired French Military Orthopedic Surgeons’ Opinions on Their Careers

Owing to their professional and personal experiences, retired military orthopedic surgeons' views of their careers are a unique source of inspiration. Reflecting on their experiences allows them to grasp the positive points and those that need to be improved for future generations. The purpose of this study is to gather the opinions of retired surgeons on the career of military orthopedic surgeons. We addressed a questionnaire to all retired French military orthopedic surgeons in the database of the Chair of Applied Surgery for the Armed Forces as of December 2020, retrained in the civilian sector. A questionnaire sent by email made it possible to collect demographic, professional, and personal data about their careers. Subjective data were evaluated using a visual analog scale from 0 to 10 or a subjective qualification scale. The main assessment criterion was the average score (out of 10) of the retired surgeons' opinions on their careers. Fifty-two percent of retired surgeons replied (32 out of 61), with the respondents having an average age of 63 years. They had been in military retirement for an average of 14 years and had practiced for approximately 13.5 years. The majority (28 out of 32) had had a civilian activity after leaving the army. The three main reasons for leaving were the unsatisfactory working environment, the high number of deployments, and insufficient pay. Nevertheless, the respondents were satisfied with their activity, their job, and their training. The average score given for the overall opinion on their careers was 8.14/10. The three main disadvantages of the career that were noted were the quality of family life, the conditions of employment, and the financial aspects. The majority were very satisfied with the second half of their civil career. Overall, the opinion of retired French military orthopedic surgeons on their careers is very good. Their point of view provides interesting elements for reflection from both a professional point of view and a personal point of view. They were very satisfied with the quality of their training, their job, and their activity. However, the quality of their personal/family life, working conditions, and the financial aspects of the career reduced this satisfaction. The results also have potential application in improving the preparation of young military orthopedic surgeons.

Comparative analysis of the economic costs of treating patients with non-infectious diseases of internal osteosynthesis

A comparative analysis of the economic costs of revision surgical treatment of 121 patients with non-infectious complications of internal osteosynthesis and 59 patients who underwent primary osteosynthesis for fractures of the long bones of the limbs with an uncomplicated course was carried out. General economic costs include direct and indirect costs. It was found that the total costs for the treatment of patients suffering from non-infectious complications of internal osteosynthesis of the long bones of the extremities, who are in the clinic of military traumatology and orthopedics. G.I. Turner of the Military Medical Academy in the period from 2007 to 2018 revision surgery was performed, amounted to 279637238 rubles, which corresponds to 2311051,55 rubles per patient. At the same time, the total costs for the treatment of patients with fractures of the long bones of the extremities without complications amounted to 44960873 rubles (762048,69 rubles per patient). The total cost per patient with a non-infectious complication of internal osteosynthesis of the femur was 2540499,54 rubles (483824,85 straight, 2056674,69 indirect), of the leg bones 2333762,17 rubles (474501,47 straight, 1859260,70 indirect), the humerus 1830362,75 rubles (399942 straight, 1430420,75 indirect), the bones of the forearm 1804664,6 rubles (339700 straight, 1464964,6 indirect). It was revealed that due to failures after primary osteosynthesis of limb fractures and complications, the costs associated with the direct and indirect costs of their treatment increase. In this regard, further research is needed to improve the treatment of complications of internal osteosynthesis and to develop a set of measures for their prevention. This is important both for the patient and for the health care system as a whole.

The Military Orthopedics Tracking Injuries and Outcomes Network: A Solution for Improving Musculoskeletal Care in the Military Health System.

Musculoskeletal injuries are an endemic amongst U.S. Military Service Members and significantly strain the Department of Defense's Military Health System. The Military Health System aims to provide Service Members, military retirees, and their families the right care at the right time. The Military Orthopedics Tracking Injuries and Outcomes Network (MOTION) captures the data that can optimize musculoskeletal care within the Military Health System. This report provides MOTION structural framework and highlights how it can be used to optimize musculoskeletal care. MOTION established an internet-based data capture system, the MOTION Musculoskeletal Data Portal. All adult Military Health System patients who undergo orthopedic surgery are eligible for entry into the database. All data are collected as routine standard of care, with patients and orthopedic surgeons inputting validated global and condition-specific patient reported outcomes and operative case data, respectively. Patients have the option to consent to allow their standard of care data to be utilized within an institutional review board approved observational research study. MOTION data can be merged with other existing data systems (e.g., electronic medical record) to develop a comprehensive dataset of relevant information. In pursuit of enhancing musculoskeletal injury patient outcomes MOTION aims to: (1) identify factors which predict favorable outcomes; (2) develop models which inform the surgeon and military commanders if patients are behind, on, or ahead of schedule for their targeted return-to-duty/activity; and (3) develop predictive models to better inform patients and surgeons of the likelihood of a positive outcome for various treatment options to enhance patient counseling and expectation management. This is a protocol article describing the intent and methodology for MOTION; thus, to date, there are no results to report. MOTION was established to capture the data that are necessary to improve military medical readiness and optimize medical resource utilization through the systematic evaluation of short- and long-term musculoskeletal injury patient outcomes. The systematic enhancement of musculoskeletal injury care through data analyses aligns with the National Defense Authorization Act (2017) and Defense Health Agency's Quadruple Aim, which emphasizes optimizing healthcare delivery and Service Member medical readiness. This transformative approach to musculoskeletal care can be applied across disciplines within the Military Health System.