The present experiment examined different components of motor control that may be impaired in normal aging, senile dementia of the Alzheimer type (SDAT), and Parkinson's disease (PD). Specifically, A. M. Wing and A. B. Kristofferson's (1973) formal quantitative model of rhythmic finger tapping was used to obtain estimates of central timekeeping and response execution components of timing control. Subjects included young college students, healthy older adults, nondemented individuals with PD, and individuals with very mild and mild SDAT. Individuals with mild SDAT exhibited a breakdown in the central timekeeping mechanism but not in the execution of the response. Both very mild SDAT and PD individuals did not show any deficits in the two timing mechanisms relative to age-matched healthy controls. Finally, there was no effect of normal aging on timing control in this task. This study underscores the importance of examining issues of motor control in SDAT as a function of separate processing components and stages of disease progression. Senile dementia of the Alzheimer type (SDAT) is characterized by a relatively generalized breakdown in cognitive performance. Although the deficits observed in Alzheimer's disease appear to encompass most aspects of cognitive performance, it is has been shown that isolatable aspects of cognitive performance appear to deteriorate at different rates as the disease progresses (see, e.g., Balota & Duchek, 1991). The isolation of such subcomponents in SDAT is important because it will allow a better understanding of the cognitive breakdowns in these individuals and potentially help in the development of better screening procedures. Finally, such an analysis may also provide useful information regarding models of healthy cognitive functioning (e.g., see Balota & Ferraro, 1993). Although there is an extensive literature delineating cognitive deficits in SDAT individuals in the areas of attention, memory, and language (see Nebes, 1989, for a review), one component of performance that has received relatively little attention is the area of motor control. Moreover, the few available reports addressing motor control in SDAT have
Read full abstract