Migraine Prevention Research Articles

Patient-reported outcomes related to migraine burden among patients treated with standard-of-care preventive medications or calcitonin gene-related monoclonal antibodies: a United States and Europe cross-sectional survey

Objective To evaluate quality of life, migraine disability, and work productivity and activity impairment in patients with migraine who received preventive treatment by comparing standard of care preventive medications and calcitonin gene-related monoclonal antibodies (CGRP mAbs), including galcanezumab alone. Methods This cross-sectional study conducted across the United States (US) and Europe used data from the Adelphi Migraine Disease Specific Programme. Physicians completed record forms for consecutive patients, who then completed self-report forms assessing patient-reported outcomes (PROs) such as quality of life, migraine disability, and work productivity and activity impairment. T-tests, Fisher’s exact test, and Mann–Whitney U test were used for analysis. Results From May 2022 to June 2023, 557 physicians submitted data for 6723 patients. A total of 4036 patients (US 956; Europe 3080) with a history of preventive treatment were included (>60% female, >80% White, mean [standard deviation] age range, 38.7 [12.8] to 46.3 [12.1]). Patients who received 3+ lines of preventive therapy and were receiving CGRP mAbs (including galcanezumab alone) had enhanced health-related quality of life (HRQoL) compared to those who received standard of care. Similar findings were observed across Europe; however, in the US, there was no significant difference in any PROs. Conclusion Patients with migraine in the overall population and Europe who received 3+ lines of preventive migraine therapy and were receiving CGRP mAbs/galcanezumab demonstrated enhanced HRQoL compared to those who received standard of care.

Crowdsourcing Adverse Events Associated With Monoclonal Antibodies Targeting Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide Signaling for Migraine Prevention: Natural Language Processing Analysis of Social Media.

Clinical trials demonstrate the efficacy and tolerability of medications targeting calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) signaling for migraine prevention. However, these trials may not accurately reflect the real-world experiences of more diverse and heterogeneous patient populations, who often have higher disease burden and more comorbidities. Therefore, postmarketing safety surveillance is warranted. Regulatory organizations encourage marketing authorization holders to screen digital media for suspected adverse reactions, applying the same requirements as for spontaneous reports. Real-world data from social media platforms constitute a potential venue to capture diverse patient experiences and help detect treatment-related adverse events. However, while social media holds promise for this purpose, its use in pharmacovigilance is still in its early stages. Computational linguistics, which involves the automatic manipulation and quantitative analysis of oral or written language, offers a potential method for exploring this content. This study aims to characterize adverse events related to monoclonal antibodies targeting CGRP signaling on Reddit, a large online social media forum, by using computational linguistics. We examined differences in word frequencies from medication-related posts on the Reddit subforum r/Migraine over a 10-year period (2010-2020) using computational linguistics. The study had 2 phases: a validation phase and an application phase. In the validation phase, we compared posts about propranolol and topiramate, as well as posts about each medication against randomly selected posts, to identify known and expected adverse events. In the application phase, we analyzed posts discussing 2 monoclonal antibodies targeting CGRP signaling-erenumab and fremanezumab-to identify potential adverse events for these medications. From 22,467 Reddit r/Migraine posts, we extracted 402 (2%) propranolol posts, 1423 (6.33%) topiramate posts, 468 (2.08%) erenumab posts, and 73 (0.32%) fremanezumab posts. Comparing topiramate against propranolol identified several expected adverse events, for example, "appetite," "weight," "taste," "foggy," "forgetful," and "dizziness." Comparing erenumab against a random selection of terms identified "constipation" as a recurring keyword. Comparing erenumab against fremanezumab identified "constipation," "depression," "vomiting," and "muscle" as keywords. No adverse events were identified for fremanezumab. The validation phase of our study accurately identified common adverse events for oral migraine preventive medications. For example, typical adverse events such as "appetite" and "dizziness" were mentioned in posts about topiramate. When we applied this methodology to monoclonal antibodies targeting CGRP or its receptor-fremanezumab and erenumab, respectively-we found no definite adverse events for fremanezumab. However, notable flagged words for erenumab included "constipation," "depression," and "vomiting." In conclusion, computational linguistics applied to social media may help identify potential adverse events for novel therapeutics. While social media data show promise for pharmacovigilance, further work is needed to improve its reliability and usability.

Safety and Efficacy of Atogepant for the Preventive Treatment of Migraines in Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: Migraine is a common neurological condition marked by unilateral recurrent pulsating headaches, often associated with systemic signs and symptoms. Recently, calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) antagonists, including atogepant, an oral CGRP receptor antagonist, have emerged as effective and safe treatments. The current study sought to assess the efficacy and safety of atogepant for preventing episodic migraines in adults. Methods: A comprehensive search, following PRISMA guidelines, was conducted using PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library to identify randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials published up to June 2024. Results: The studies included adult participants with episodic migraine treated with atogepant. The primary outcomes assessed were changes in mean monthly migraine days (MMDs) and monthly headache days (MHDs) over 12 weeks. Secondary outcomes included reduction in acute medication use, 50% responder rates, and adverse events. A meta-analysis using a random-effects model was performed to evaluate efficacy and safety. Six trials with 4569 participants were included. Atogepant significantly reduced mean monthly migraine days (MMDs) and monthly headache days (MHDs) compared to placebo at all doses (10 mg, 30 mg, 60 mg), with the 60 mg dose showing the greatest reduction (mean difference: −1.48 days, p < 0.001). Significant reductions in acute medication use and improved 50% responder rates were also observed for all doses. The safety profile of atogepant was favorable, with common adverse events being mild to moderate, such as constipation and nausea. There were no significant differences in serious adverse events between the atogepant and placebo groups. Conclusions: Atogepant is an effective and well-tolerated option for preventing episodic migraines, showing significant reductions in migraine frequency and acute medication use. However, further studies are necessary to assess its long-term safety and efficacy, especially at higher doses, and to investigate its potential role in personalized treatment strategies for migraine prevention.

Updated Canadian Headache Society Migraine Prevention Guideline with Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

We have updated the migraine prevention guideline of the Canadian Headache Society from 2012, as there are new therapies available, and additionally, we have provided guidelines for the prevention of chronic migraine, which was not addressed in the previous iteration. We undertook a systematic review to identify new studies since the last guideline. For studies identified, we performed data extraction and subsequent meta-analyses where possible. We composed a summary of the evidence found and undertook a modified Delphi recommendation process. We provide recommendations for treatments identified and additionally expert guidance on the use of the treatments available in important clinical situations. We identified 61 studies that were included in this evidence update and identified 16 therapies we focused on. The anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) agents were approved by Health Canada between 2018 and 2024 and provide additional options for episodic and chronic migraine prevention. We also summarize evidence for the use of propranolol, topiramate and onabotulinumtoxinA in addition to anti-CGRP agents as treatments for chronic migraine. We have downgraded topiramate to a weak recommendation for use and gabapentin to a weak recommendation against its use in episodic migraine. We have weakly recommended the use of memantine, levetiracetam, enalapril and melatonin in episodic migraine. Based on the evidence synthesis, we provide updated recommendations for the prevention of episodic and chronic migraine utilizing treatments available in Canada. We additionally provided expert guidance on their use in clinical situations.

Long-term reductions in acute headache medication use after eptinezumab treatment in patients with migraine and prior preventive treatment failures: Post hoc analysis of the DELIVER randomized trial.

To evaluate long-term reductions in acute headache medication (AHM) use with eptinezumab versus placebo in patients with prior preventive migraine treatment failures and medication overuse (MO). Preventive migraine treatment is recommended for patients for whom AHMs have failed and for those who are using excessive amounts of AHM. MO may worsen headache and migraine symptoms in people with migraine; it is a risk factor for disease chronification and/or MO headache. DELIVER was a multicenter, parallel-group, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, phase 3b clinical trial that randomized adults with migraine and two to four prior preventive failures to eptinezumab 100 mg, 300 mg, or placebo infusion every 12 weeks; patients initially given placebo received eptinezumab 100 mg or 300 mg in the extension period. MO was defined according to diagnostic criteria for MO headache in the baseline diary reports. This post hoc analysis of the DELIVER study included change from baseline in AHM days/month of use (ergotamines, triptans, simple or combination analgesics, and opioids; total and select class-specific use) in the MO population. A total of 890 patients were included in the total population, and 438/890 (49.2%) had MO at baseline. In both the total population and MO population, eptinezumab resulted in greater reductions in total AHM days/month of use during weeks 1-24 than placebo, with triptans showing the largest reduction among AHM classes. Patients switching from placebo to eptinezumab experienced reductions in AHM days/month similar to that of initial eptinezumab treatment. In the extension population, mean (standard error [SE]) changes from baseline in AHM days/month were -4.6 (0.32; 100 mg) and -4.8 (0.32; 300 mg) across weeks 1-4 in patients who received eptinezumab for the entire treatment period and were -4.8 (0.44; placebo-100 mg) and -5.5 (0.44; placebo-300 mg) across weeks 25-28 in patients who switched from placebo to eptinezumab. Mean (SE) changes from baseline in AHM days/month in the extension MO population were -6.5 (0.59; 100 mg) and -6.6 (0.57; 300 mg) across weeks 1-4 in patients who received eptinezumab for the entire treatment period and were -7.1 (0.81; 100 mg) and -8.0 (0.80; 300 mg) across weeks 25-28 in patients who were switched from placebo to eptinezumab. All treatment arms sustained or further reduced AHM use across 18 months of trial participation. Across weeks 1-4, in patients fulfilling criteria for MO at baseline, 68.0% (102/150) of patients treated with eptinezumab 100 mg and 74.7% (109/146) of patients treated with eptinezumab 300 mg reported AHM use below MO thresholds compared to 43.3% (61/141) of patients receiving placebo. In patients with MO at baseline, the proportion of patients without MO remained above 60.0% for all treatment groups during the extension period. Eptinezumab reduced total AHM use more than placebo in patients with prior preventive failures and in patients with MO at baseline; largest reductions were observed for triptans. Robust reductions in AHM use after eptinezumab were sustained or further reduced with up to 18 months of treatment, and most patients no longer met thresholds for MO.

A call for academic pragmatic clinical trials to address open questions in migraine prevention.

The migraine treatment landscape has seen significant advancements in recent years, including the introduction of novel preventive agents specifically targeting the disease. These new treatments offer improved efficacy and tolerability, potentially addressing the issue of poor treatment adherence commonly observed with conventional preventatives. In this context, pragmatic trials emerge as a critical tool for advancing migraine care, offering a real-world approach to evaluating open clinical questions at the same time as avoiding the biases of real-world observational evidence. By prioritizing external validity and patient-centered outcomes, pragmatic trials provide valuable insights into the advantages of new treatments in improving migraine care. Possible applications of pragmatic trials in migraine research include head-to-head comparisons, evaluation of combination therapies, assessment of treatment sequences and switch, testing the added value of patient-reported outcomes, investigation of long-term effectiveness and on optimal treatment duration, understanding the role of preventive treatments in altering the course of migraine and preventing progression, and cost-effectiveness analyses. Pragmatic trials allow for the assessment of interventions in diverse patient populations and healthcare settings, enhancing the generalizability of findings and informing evidence-based clinical practice. As such, pragmatic trials represent an excellent tool to bridge the gap between placebo-controlled trials and real-world practice and should receive consideration for funding, especially by public institutions such as universities, national health services, and charities.

Causal relationships between cortical brain structural alterations and migraine subtypes: a bidirectional Mendelian randomization study of 2,347 neuroimaging phenotypes

BackgroundPrevious studies have shown that migraines are associated with brain structural changes. However, the causal relationships between these changes and migraine, as well as its subtypes, migraine with aura (MA) and migraine without aura (MO), remain largely unclear.MethodsWe utilized genome-wide association study (GWAS) summary statistics from European cohorts for 2,347 cortical structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) phenotypes, derived from both T1-weighted and diffusion tensor imaging scans (n = 36,663), with migraine and its subtypes (n = 147,970–375,752). Cortical phenotypes included both macrostructural (e.g., cortical thickness, surface area) and microstructural (e.g., fractional anisotropy, mean diffusivity) features. Genetic correlations were first assessed to identify significant associations, followed by bidirectional Mendelian randomization (MR) analyses to determine causal relationships between these brain phenotypes and migraine, as well as its subtypes (MA and MO). Sensitivity analyses were applied to ensure the robustness of the results.ResultsGenetic correlation analysis identified 510 significant associations between cortical structural phenotypes and migraine across 401 distinct traits. Forward MR analysis revealed nine significant causal effects of cortical structural changes on migraine risk. Specifically, increased cortical thickness and local gyrification index in specific cortical regions were associated with a decreased risk of overall migraine, MA, and MO, while intracellular volume fraction and orientation diffusion index in specific regions increased the risk of MA and MO. Reverse MR analysis demonstrated that MA causally increased mean diffusivity in the insular and frontal opercular cortex. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of these findings, with no evidence of horizontal pleiotropy or heterogeneity.ConclusionThis study identifies causal relationships between cortical neuroimaging phenotypes and migraine, highlighting potential biomarkers for migraine diagnosis, treatment, and prevention.

Efficacy of Melatonin as a Promising Intervention for Migraine Prevention: A Systematic Review of Randomized Control Trials

Efficacy of Melatonin as a Promising Intervention for Migraine Prevention: A Systematic Review of Randomized Control Trials

The role of vitamin D in the development and prevention of migraine: a review

Introduction and Purpose Migraine is a widespread neurological disorder characterized by severe, pulsating headaches often accompanied by nausea, vomiting, and hypersensitivity to light and sound. Although its exact cause is still under investigation, recent studies suggest that vitamin D deficiency may play a role in migraine occurrence and severity. Vitamin D, known primarily for its role in bone health, also affects the nervous and immune systems, and may influence inflammatory processes involved in migraine pathogenesis. This literature review aims to explore the relationship between vitamin D supplementation and the frequency and intensity of migraines, and whether supplementation could support migraine treatment. Material and Methods A comprehensive literature review was conducted using the PubMed database, focusing on articles published until the end of 2023. The search included the keywords: "vitamin D," "migraine," "headache," and "supplementation" in various combinations. Relevant studies were selected based on criteria such as monitoring vitamin D levels and the use of supplementation as an intervention in migraine patients. Results The results of the review suggest that vitamin D deficiency may be associated with an increased frequency of migraines. Supplementation with vitamin D was linked to a reduction in both the frequency and severity of migraines. While not all studies were consistent, the majority indicated that supplementation had a positive impact, particularly in individuals with vitamin D deficiency. Conclusions The findings suggest that vitamin D deficiency could be a risk factor for migraines, and that supplementation with vitamin D may help reduce the severity and frequency of migraine attacks. Although further research is required to establish optimal dosages and treatment protocols, vitamin D supplementation shows promise as a supportive therapy in migraine management.

Associations between the waist-to-height ratio index and migraine: A cross-section study of the NHANES 1999-2004.

The importance of obesity as a factor that increases the probability of migraine episodes is increasingly acknowledged. Thus, this study aimed to explore the potential correlation between central obesity and migraine, emphasizing the waist-to-height ratio (WHtR) as a key measure in assessing this relationship. This cross-sectional analysis included 13,344 individuals who participated in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) from 1999-2004. To investigate the association associations between WHtR and migraine, we utilized refined multivariate logistic regression models, smoothing curve fitting methods, subpopulation analysis, and interactive testing. Of the 13,344 participants, 2,764 (20.72%) had migraines. A significant positive correlation was observed between the WHtR and migraine incidence in both the partially adjusted model (3.08 [95% CI: 1.92-4.94]) and the crude model (1.95 [95% CI: 1.23-3.08]). The participants in the highest quartile of the WHtR had a 13% greater incidence of migraine than those in the lowest quartile [1.13(0.99,1.28)]. The interaction analysis revealed a statistically significant difference (p<0.01) in this relationship among the subgroups. Notably, the correlation between WHtR and migraine risk was not significant and negative in patients ≥60 years, indicating that obesity has a mitigating role in preventing migraine in this elderly population. The incidence of migraine increased concomitantly with increased WHtR. However, central obesity has a protective effect against migraine occurrence in individuals ≥60 years. Thus, our findings underscore the importance of WHtR in migraine prevention and management strategies and highlight its potential as a critical biomarker for mitigating migraine incidence.

Real-World Experience of Erenumab in Patients with Migraine in Germany: The SPECTRE Study.

To provide real-world insights into migraine patient population in Germany treated with erenumab, focusing on the prescription patterns and reasons for the initial dosage choice. SPECTRE was an observational, non-interventional, multicenter, open-label, single-arm study in patients treated with erenumab according to approved local dose and guidelines. The study enrolled adult patients (n = 571; Germany: 105 sites) with migraine who had received erenumab for not more than 3months before the start of the study. The mean (standard deviation) patient age was 45.0 (12.3) years, and most patients were female (89.0%), Caucasian (97.6%), and non-smokers (85.1%). The starting dose of erenumab was 70mg in 68.5% of patients and 140mg in 31.5%. The proportion of patients with 140mg as the starting dose was the highest (43.5%) in those aged 30-40years. The most common reason for starting a higher dose of erenumab 140mg was severity of migraine (47.4%). During the observational period, the proportion of patients taking erenumab 140mg increased to 64.6% (visit 5; V5) after 12months. Due to attrition of patients towards the end of the study (V9: 90 participants), data at V9 must be interpreted with caution. At least one dose change was performed in 45.3% of patients (i.e., erenumab 70 to 140mg or 140 to 70mg), 21.2% of patients attempted at least once to discontinue treatment (i.e., period with erenumab discontinuation and no other antibody treatment for migraine prevention), and 15.3% discontinued erenumab treatment, mainly because of no or insufficient treatment response (13.5%). The mean time until the first omission attempt was 332.3 (range 37-633) days. Constipation (12.1%) was the most frequently reported adverse event, in line with the summary of product characteristics (SmPC) of erenumab. Most patients with migraine were prescribed erenumab 70mg as the starting dose. No new safety signals were observed for erenumab versus the previous trials.

Efficacy and Tolerability of Erenumab and Topiramate for Prevention of Chronic Migraine: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Background and Objectives: Migraine is a chronic neurological disorder affecting approximately 14% of the global population. Beyond physical pain, migraines significantly impact individuals’ quality of life, influencing education, employment, and income levels. Topiramate, a second-generation antiepileptic medication, has demonstrated notable efficacy in reducing the occurrence of chronic migraine. Over the past three decades, extensive research has implicated the neuropeptide calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) in migraine pathogenesis. Erenumab, the first FDA-approved CGRP inhibitor, received approval in 2018. This study aims to compare the clinical efficacy of Erenumab and Topiramate for migraine prevention. Materials and Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of adults with episodic or chronic migraine over a 12-month period, comparing Erenumab (n = 52) and Topiramate (n = 56). Outcomes assessed included changes in the Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) scores from baseline over the last three months of treatment and the proportion of patients achieving a ≥50% reduction in MIDAS scores by the end of the study. Results: The Erenumab group showed significant improvement, with nearly 79% of patients achieving a 50% reduction in their MIDAS score, with a mean reduction of 3.76. Notably, only two patients (3.8.5) discontinued treatment due to adverse events. In contrast, the Topiramate group had over 15% of patients achieve a 50% reduction in MIDAS scores, with a mean reduction of 5.89, and a had discontinuation rate of 14.2% due to adverse events. Conclusions: Both Topiramate and Erenumab are effective for migraine prevention. However, Topiramate has lower tolerability and more side effects, while Erenumab offers better tolerability and safety at a higher cost. Treatment decisions should be individualized based on patient needs, efficacy, safety, and cost considerations.

The Evidence for Diet as a Treatment in Migraine-A Review.

Background/objectives: The connection between diet and migraine has gained increasing attention in migraine research due to its potential relevance as part of migraine treatment. This study reviewed the current evidence on the use of diets or specific foods in the prevention of migraine. Methods: A PubMed search was performed with the keywords "diet and migraine" OR "brain-gut-axis and migraine". One author (KVN) screened titles, abstracts, and full-text articles and excluded or included them based on eligibility criteria. Results: A ketogenic diet and a "Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension" diet reduced attack duration (p < 0.002), frequency (p < 0.05), and severity (p < 0.01). The ketogenic diet also reduced monthly medication intake (p ≤ 0.05). A low-fat vegan diet mixed with an elimination diet reduced the attack duration (p < 0.01), frequency (p < 0.05), severity (p < 0.0001), and percentage of medicated headaches (p < 0.001). Elimination diet reduced attack duration (p < 0.05), frequency (p < 0.02), severity (p < 0.01), and medication intake (p < 0.002). Elimination diet with IgG-positive foods reduced attack frequency (p < 0.001), and total medication intake (p < 0.01). Gluten-free diet reduced frequency (p = 0.02) and severity (p = 0.013). Conclusions: Certain diets and food items may trigger attacks in some migraine patients, though the overall evidence supporting this is limited. Modifying a diet may reduce symptoms such as attack duration, frequency, severity, and medication intake. However, the included studies' small populations and diverse study designs make the results difficult to apply in clinical practise. Further high-quality, double-blinded, randomised controlled trials are necessary to confirm the association between diet and migraine.

Concomitant use of calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) antagonists with azole antifungals in patients with hematological malignancies.

Small molecule calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) antagonists such as rimegepant, ubrogepant, and atogepant have been approved for migraine treatment and/or prevention. These molecules are metabolized by cytochrome P-450 3A4 (CYP3A4) enzymes in vivo, hence they are contraindicated or recommended to be avoided in combination with strong/moderate CYP3A4 inhibitors, namely posaconazole (strong) and isavuconazonium (moderate). However, no literature has been published on the impact this interaction has on patient safety and tolerability. In this case series, we report five cases in which CGRP antagonists and azole antifungal therapy were given concurrently, to provide real-world outcomes of this interaction. Electronic medical records at our hospital system were reviewed between January 2021 and December 2023 to find patients who met the criteria of hematological malignancy, taking CGRP-antagonist and azole antifungal therapy. Records were then further investigated to find cases where CGRP antagonists and azole antifungals were used concomitantly. Concurrent use of CGRP antagonists and azole antifungal therapy was feasible for patients with migraines and hematological malignancies. None of the patients experienced any grade 3 or higher non-hematological toxicity from the proposed over-exposure to CGRP antagonist. The combination was well tolerated without any need for therapy discontinuation or dose modifications. It is recommended to follow the manufacturers' guidance on drug interactions, however, in the setting where there are no other options, concomitant use of CGRP antagonists with azole antifungals is possible with monitoring and observation for adverse effects.

Monitoring Pregnancies Exposed to Galcanezumab for Migraine in a United States Administrative Claims Database.

Galcanezumab is a calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibody indicated for migraine prevention in adults. Due to the long half-life of galcanezumab and the prevalence of migraine in women of childbearing age, galcanezumab exposure may occur during pregnancy. However, real-world use and safety of galcanezumab during pregnancy has not been fully described. To help fill this gap, galcanezumab has two ongoing pregnancy safety studies, one of which is an insurance claims database study. This database study is actively identifying and following pregnancies exposed to galcanezumab using commercial claims from the Healthcare Integrated Research Database (HIRD). Patient accrual is planned from September 2018 to June 2026, with a final study report planned for December 2027. This study requires 430 galcanezumab-exposed pregnancies with linked infants to reach power for comparative analysis of major congenital malformations. Recent monitoring of patient accrual, including data from 28 September 2018 to 31 January 2023, identified 207 galcanezumab-exposed pregnancies in women with migraine in the HIRD, of which 110 were live births and 73 of which were linked to an infant. This represents an annual accrual rate of approximately 17 pregnancies linked to infants, which is substantially lower than the 55 required annually to reach target size within current regulatory-committed study timelines. The accrual of a sufficient number of galcanezumab-exposed pregnancies represents a substantial, but not uncommon, barrier to conducting comparative analyses in pregnancy studies. Potential solutions that would allow for timely dissemination of important safety information to patients and providers may be available.

A Case Report of Chronic Migraine Lasting 30 Years and Treated with Acupuncture

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to report the effectiveness of Korean medicine in the treatment of chronic migraine persisting for 30 years. This patient had been taking various painkillers (acetaminophen, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, caffeine hydrate, etc.) every day for 30 years.Methods: The patient with chronic migraine was treated with acupuncture. Acupuncture treatment was performed on the gall bladder meridian (足少陽膽經) and bladder meridian (足太陽膀胱經) line passing through 24 of the 31 injection sites used for chronic migraine prevention treatment with botulinum toxin type A. The severity of the symptom was assessed by the daily Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) score of pain.Results: The patient received outpatient treatment 42 times and received only acupuncture treatment each time. The patient said that after 4 sessions of acupuncture treatment, the severity of pain was reduced from NRS 7 to NRS 5 and that the frequency and duration of the symptoms were lower. After 8 sessions of acupuncture treatment, the symptoms were reduced to NRS 3 and, after 14 days of treatment, to 0~1. Now she barely has any severe headaches.Conclusion: The findings of this study suggest that treatment with Korean medicine can be an effective option in treating chronic migraine. In addition, acupuncture can be a good treatment method for chronic migraine that cannot be fundamentally controlled by Western pain relievers.

A Discrete-Choice Experiment Assessing the Patient Preferences and Real-World Experiences of Patients with Migraine in Japan.

Migraine is a debilitating headache disorder with a high prevalence in Japan that imposes significant societal burden. Although the Japanese Clinical Practice Guideline for Headache Disorders 2021 recommends both acute and preventive migraine treatments, the usage of preventive treatments is still limited. Therefore, it is crucial to understand the treatment preferences of patients with migraine pertaining to both acute and preventive treatments. A mixed-methods study including a discrete choice experiment (DCE) was conducted with Japanese patients with migraine (10 for the qualitative interviews, and 400 for the DCE) who were recruited from the Rakuten Insight panel. The DCE presented hypothetical treatment options including oral acute, oral preventive, and injectable preventive medications. Six attributes (method of delivery, reduction of pain, impact of headaches on daily routines, dosage adjustability, and temporary and persistent side effects) each with three levels were included in the survey. A hierarchical Bayesian model was used to estimate relative attribute importance scores (RAI) for all attributes. For the 400 participants in the DCE, the most common age bracket was 40-49years old, and the majority were female (66.75%). RAI estimates indicated that "method of delivery" was the most important attribute for patients (RAI 51.92, SD = 10.20), followed by "reduction of pain when experiencing a headache" (RAI 17.00, SD = 7.74). Oral preventive treatments were preferred over injectable preventive treatments. The qualitative interviews showed that patients prefer oral medications to injectable treatments, and a lack of awareness regarding preventive treatments. This study found that the "method of delivery" was the most important driver of treatment preferences of patients with migraine in Japan, with oral acute medications being preferred. Oral preventive treatments were found to be preferred over injectable treatments. These results may indicate the need for increased education regarding preventive treatments, as well as the need for further development of these treatments.

An indirect treatment comparison meta-analysis of digital versus face-to-face cognitive behavior therapy for headache

Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) is effective for headache disorders. However, it is unclear whether the emerging digital CBT is noninferior to face-to-face CBT. An indirect treatment comparison (ITC) meta-analysis was conducted to assess the relative effects between them using standard mean differences (SMDs). Effective sample size (ESS) and required sample size (RSS) were calculated to demonstrate the robustness of the results. Our study found that digital CBT had a similar effect on headache frequency reduction (SMD, 0.12; 95%CI, −2.45 to 2.63) compared with face-to-face CBT. The ESS had 84 participants, while the RSS had 466 participants to achieve the same power as a non-inferior head-to-head trial. Digital CBT is as effective as face-to-face CBT in preventing headache disorders. Due to the heterogeneity (I2 = 94.5%, τ2 = 1.83) and the fact that most of the included studies were on migraine prevention, further head-to-head trials are warranted.

First real-world study on the effectiveness and tolerability of rimegepant for acute migraine therapy in Chinese patients

BackgroundRimegepant, a small molecule calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) receptor antagonist, is indicated for acute and preventive migraine treatment in the United States and other countries. However, there is a lack of prospective real-world evidence for the use of rimegepant in Chinese migraine patients.MethodsThis was a single-arm, prospective, real-world study. While taking rimegepant to treat migraine attacks as needed, eligible participants were asked to record their pain intensity, functional ability, and accompanying symptoms for a single attack at predose and 0.5, 1, 2, 24, and 48 h postdose via a digital platform. Adverse events (AEs) during the rimegepant treatment period were recorded and analysed. The percentages of participants who experienced moderate to severe pain at predose and 0.5, 1, 2, 24, and 48 h postdose were assessed. Additionally, the percentages of participants who reported better/good outcomes in terms of pain intensity, functional ability, and accompanying symptoms at 0.5, 1, 2, 24, and 48 h postdose were analysed. In addition, the total cohort (full population, FP) was stratified into a prior nonresponder (PNR) group to observe the effectiveness and safety of rimegepant for relatively refractory migraine and a rimegepant and eptinezumab (RE) group to observe the effectiveness and safety of the combination of these drugs.ResultsBy November 24th, 2023, 133 participants (FP, n = 133; PNR group, n = 40; RE group, n = 28) were enrolled, and 99 participants (FP, n = 99; PNR group, n = 30; RE group, n = 23) were included in the analysis. Rimegepant was effective in treating migraine in the FP and both subgroups, with a significant decreasing trend in the percentages of participants experiencing moderate to severe pain postdose (p < 0.05) and a marked increase in the percentages of participants who reported better/good outcomes in terms of pain intensity, functional ability, and accompanying symptoms at 0.5, 1, 2, 24, and 48 h postdose compared with predose. AEs were reported by 6% of participants in the FP, and all AEs were mild.ConclusionsIn the real world, rimegepant is effective in the acute treatment of migraine patients in China. The low incidence rate of AEs highlighted the favourable tolerability profile of rimegepant.Trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov NCT05709106. Retrospectively registered on 2023-02-01.Graphical

Traditional Chinese Medicine Use in the Pathophysiological Processes of Migraine

Abstract Migraine is a highly prevalent neurological disorder and has been the second leading cause of disability worldwide for many years. The pathophysiology of migraines is complicated, and most available medications have unpleasant side effects. Therefore, it is essential to understand the mechanism of migraine to develop potential preventive and therapeutic agents. Studies have confirmed that traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) can alleviate migraine by reducing neuroinflammation, oxidative stress, and apoptosis and regulating neurotransmitters and vascular function. Starting from the pathophysiological process of migraine, this review summarizes the mechanisms by which TCM improves neurovascular function after migraine to provide clues and a reference for the clinical application of TCM in the prevention and treatment of migraine and guide further research and development of new drugs.