Midfoot Pain Research Articles

Efficacy of arch contouring foot orthoses for midfoot osteoarthritis: Protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Midfoot osteoarthritis (OA) is a painful and disabling condition. Arch contouring foot orthoses have been recommended for midfoot OA, yet there is no high-quality evidence from randomised controlled trials to support their use. This clinical trial aims to evaluate the efficacy of arch contouring foot orthoses for midfoot OA. This will be a parallel-group randomised controlled superiority trial. One-hundred and forty community-dwelling people with painful midfoot OA will be randomised to receive either arch contouring foot orthoses or flat sham inserts. Outcome measures will be obtained at baseline, 4, 8 and 12weeks; the primary endpoint for assessing efficacy being 12weeks. The primary outcome measure will be average midfoot pain whilst walking over the last 7days on an 11-point numerical rating scale. Secondary outcome measures include function (walking/standing subscale of the Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire), participants' perception of overall treatment effect (self-reported global rating of change on a 15-point Likert scale), physical activity (Incidental and Planned Exercise Questionnaire), general health-related quality of life (Short Form-12 Version® 2.0), use of co-interventions and adverse events. This trial will evaluate the efficacy of arch contouring foot orthoses for relieving pain and improving function, physical activity and health-related quality of life in people with midfoot OA. The findings will provide high-quality evidence as to whether arch contouring foot orthoses are efficacious and will help to inform clinical guidelines about the use of foot orthoses for midfoot OA. Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry (ACTRN12623000953639).

Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Nitinol Compression Staples for Midfoot and Chopart Arthrodesis

Nitinol staple use in orthopedic surgery has increased in recent years. Biomechanical studies provide useful data for use in foot/ankle; however, clinical data is limited. This study's purpose is to determine the efficacy of nitinol staples to achieve stable, bony arthrodesis in midfoot and Chopart joints, and examine their clinical outcomes and pain scores. A retrospective chart review was performed on 127 midfoot/Chopart joint arthrodeses (71 patients) using nitinol staples in isolation. The primary outcome variable was radiographic evidence of healing. Radiographs were blinded, randomized, and independently reviewed by three board certified foot and ankle surgeons. Complete/partial union was seen in 89% of all joints (113/127), increasing to 93% when including only midfoot joints (98/106). Chopart joints had significantly lower healing rates (15/21; 71%) compared to all midfoot joints (p = 0.01) and isolated tarsometatarsal joints (86/91; 95%) (p = 0.006). Neuropathy and smoking did not affect arthrodesis, but diabetes did (p = 0.004). Joints requiring bone grafting had worse rates of arthrodesis (38/49; 76%) (p = 0.002). For all joints, post-operative visual analog scale scores were significantly lower than pre-operative (p < 0.001). Pre-operative midfoot and Chopart pain scores were similar (p= 0.30). Midfoot joints had significantly lower pain scores post-operatively than pre-operatively (p < 0.001). No such significance existed in Chopart joints (p = 0.07). Isolated nitinol staples are a viable option for midfoot arthrodesis, especially tarsometatarsal joints, and offer significant pain improvement. Chopart joints may require more rigid fixation than nitinol staples, given the lower healing rate. Level of Clinical EvidenceIV

Distribution of Foot Arch Type and Associated Symptoms in Medical Students at Faculty of Medicine, Thammasat University

Objective: To determine the distribution of foot arch type, associated symptoms, and factors associated with moderate to severe pain Materials and Methods: The cross-sectional study was collected data from 5th year medical students, Faculty of Medicine, Thammasat University in academic year 2020. The distribution of foot arch type used the footprint and classified by Harris imprint index (HII), Chippaux-Smirak index (CSI), Staheli index (SI). The associated symptoms were collected into pain and tightness. Pain score was rated by the volunteer using numeric rating scale (NRS) at each foot/leg separately. Results: A total of ninety-eight medical students (196 feet) were recruited and analyzed. The distribution of foot arch type by HII, CSI and SI were 1) bilateral normal arched feet: 42.9%, 67.3%, 54.1% 2) bilateral pes planus: 8.2%, 12.2%, 21.4% 3) bilateral pes cavus: 25.5%, 6.1%, 5.1% 4) unilateral pes planus: 2%, 9.2%,15.3% 5) unilateral pes cavus: 21.4%, 5.1%, 4.1%, respectively. The most commonly associated symptom of pes planus was midfoot pain (17%) while pes cavus and normal arched foot were hindfoot pain (22.4% and 17.3%). The factor associated with moderate to severe pain was BMI ≥ 23 kg/m2 (OR = 3.23, 95%CI 1.63 - 6.41, p-value = 0.001). Conclusion: Bilateral normal arched feet were mostly found. Midfoot pain in pes planus and hindfoot pain in pes cavus and normal arched foot were the greatest symptoms. BMI was a risk factor.

Talonavicular-cuneiform arthrodesis in the management of Mueller-Weiss Syndrome: a retrospective case series.

Mueller-Weiss Syndrome (MWS), characterized by spontaneous adult-onset tarsal navicular osteonecrosis, is an uncommon cause of chronic midfoot pain that can lead to functional impairment and progressive deformities. This study aimed to present clinical and radiological outcomes of talonavicular-cuneiform (TNC) arthrodesis in the treatment of patients with MWS. A retrospective study was performed on 8 consecutive patients (6 female, 2 male; mean age = 50 years; range = 33-64) who underwent TNC arthrodesis using plate fixation with autologous bone grafting for the treatment of MWS. To evaluate clinical status, the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) Ankle-Midfoot Score was performed immediately preoperatively and at the final follow-up. In radiographic evaluation, talus-first metatarsal angle (Meary's angle) was measured preoperatively and at the final follow-up. Solid fusion was also examined on postoperative radiographs and computerised tomography. The mean follow-up was 35 months (range = 24-52). The mean AOFAS improved from 37 (range = 24-53) preoperatively to 85 (range = 80-93) at the final follow-up (p < 0.001). No major intra- operative complications were observed in any of the patients. According to the Maceira and Rochera radiological staging system, 5 feet was stage 3, and 3 feet was stage 4. The mean union time was 10 months (range = 5-15). Radiographic solid fusion was achieved in all but one foot that developed talonavicular non-union. TNC arthrodesis using plate fixation with autologous bone grafting seems to be an effective surgical method for reconstruction of MWS.

Müller-Weiss Disease: Midfoot Arthrodesis in Reduction vs Malreduction.

Midfoot arthrodesis is regarded as the main surgical approach for treating Müller-Weiss disease (MWD). This study aimed to investigate the incidence of postoperative pain during MWD treatment through midfoot reduction or malreduction during arthrodesis and to explore the factors influencing postoperative pain in patients with MWD. A total of 67 patients with MWD were recruited and divided into two groups according to whether midfoot alignment was reduced: reduction group (n = 38) and malreduction group (n = 29). Demographic characteristics before the operation and at the last follow-up, as well as clinical and radiographic parameters, were compared between the two groups. Clinical parameters included the American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society score and visual analog scale score, whereas radiographic parameters included the calcaneal pitch angle, lateral Meary's angle, talometatarsal-1 angle dorsoplantar (TMT1dp), talocalcaneal angle dorsoplantar (Kite angle), talonavicular coverage angle, and medial navicular pole extrusion. Postoperative complications and incidence of midfoot pain were evaluated at the last follow-up visit. The reduction group exhibited better clinical and radiological parameters, including the TMT1dp and medial navicular pole extrusion, than the malreduction group at the last follow-up (all P < .05). However, the calcaneal pitch angle, lateral Meary's angle, Kite angle, and talonavicular coverage angle did not significantly differ between the two groups (all P > .05). The overall incidence of midfoot pain was 26.4%. The reduction group showed a lower incidence of medial pain than the malreduction group (15.7% vs. 40.0%, P < .05). Regression analysis revealed that midfoot abduction, represented by the TMT1dp, was a critical factor for midfoot arthrodesis failure and that medial navicular pole extrusion was not correlated with postoperative midfoot pain. Midfoot reduction arthrodesis yields better clinical outcomes than malreduction arthrodesis. The TMT1dp, representing midfoot abduction, is a key factor for midfoot arthrodesis failure. The extruded medial navicular bone may not affect postoperative medial midfoot pain. Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Bipartite Medial Cuneiform: A Forgotten Source of Midfoot Pain – Case Report and Review of the Literature

Bipartite Medial Cuneiform: A Forgotten Source of Midfoot Pain – Case Report and Review of the Literature

Frequency of Plantar Heel Pain among Hospital Staff of Memon Medical Institute Hospital

Background: Plantar heel pain (PHP) is recognized as a widespread issue among adults, particularly affecting those with occupations necessitating prolonged standing. This condition not only causes severe pain but also leads to significant disability and impairment in daily activities. Prior research has indicated a higher incidence of PHP among specific demographics and job functions within hospital settings. Objective: The primary objective of this study was to assess the prevalence and contributory occupational factors of plantar heel pain among the staff at Memon Medical Institute Hospital, Karachi. Methods: Employing a cross-sectional study design, data was collected over a three-month period at MMIH. Participants were informed of the voluntary nature of the study and their right to withdraw at any time. A semi-structured questionnaire was administered to a sample of the medical staff to gather data on the incidence of PHP and related factors. Results: The study included 203 participants, with a gender distribution of 48.8% female (n=99) and 51.2% male (n=104). The prevalence of diagnosed heel pain was 14% among males and 25% among females. Professional breakdown revealed the highest incidence of foot pain in nurses, followed by doctors, radiographers, CCTs, NAs, URs, and physiotherapists, respectively. Conclusion: A substantial portion of the hospital staff reported experiencing heel and mid-foot pain, primarily due to the extensive standing inherent in their jobs. The lack of diagnosis and treatment, mainly attributable to a lack of awareness, suggests an urgent need for educational interventions and workplace ergonomic assessments to prevent the progression to plantar fasciitis.

Plantar pressures in people with midfoot osteoarthritis: cross-sectional findings from the Clinical Assessment Study of the Foot

BackgroundMidfoot osteoarthritis (OA) is a common condition, however its aetiology is not well understood. Understanding how plantar pressures differ between people with and without midfoot OA may provide insight into the aetiology and how best to manage this condition. Research questionTo compare plantar pressures between people with and without symptomatic radiographic midfoot OA. MethodsThis was a cross-sectional study of adults aged ≥ 50 years registered with four UK general practices who reported foot pain in the past year. Symptomatic radiographic midfoot OA was defined as midfoot pain in the last four weeks, combined with radiographic OA in one or more midfoot joints. Cases were matched 1:1 for sex and age ( ± 5 years) to controls. Peak plantar pressure and maximum force in 10 regions of the foot were determined using a pressure platform (RSscan International, Olen, Belgium) and compared between the groups using independent samples t-tests and effect sizes (Cohen’s d). ResultsWe included 61 midfoot OA cases (mean age 67.0, SD 8.1, 31 males, 30 females) and matched these to 61 controls (mean age 66.0, SD 7.9). Midfoot OA cases displayed greater force (d=0.79, medium effect size, p = <0.001) and pressure at the midfoot (d=0.70, medium effect size, p = <0.001), greater force at the fourth metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joint (d=0.28, small effect size, p = 0.13), and fifth MTP joint (d=0.37, small effect size, p = 0.10) and greater pressure at the fifth MTP joint (d=0.34, small effect size, p = 0.13). They also displayed lower force (d=0.40, small effect size, p = 0.02) and pressure at the hallux (d=0.50, medium effect size, p = <0.001) and lower force (d=0.54, medium effect size, p = <0.001) and pressure at the lesser toes (d=0.48, small effect size, p = <0.001) compared with controls. SignificanceMidfoot OA appears to be associated with lowering of the medial longitudinal arch, greater lateral push off and less propulsion at toe off. Longitudinal studies are needed to establish causal relationships.

Bipartite medial cuneiform: a potential cause of midfoot pain - case report

Bipartite medial cuneiform is a rare variant of the tarsal bones. The condition can be a potential source for non-traumatic midfoot pain and a possible misdiagnosis cause of several foot disorders, such as the anterior and posterior tibialis tendon disorder. We present the case of a patient with midfoot pain with signs and symptoms suggestive of tibialis anterior tendinopathy. Imaging tests, however, elucidated a bipartite medial cuneiform. The conservative treatment using a removable boot for six weeks effectively relieved symptoms, temporarily promoting pain and limp-free gait, but symptoms relapsed were observed at the last visit.

Structural Foot Characteristics in People With Midfoot Osteoarthritis: Cross-Sectional Findings From the Clinical Assessment Study of the Foot.

This study compared radiographic measures of foot structure between people with and without symptomatic radiographic midfoot osteoarthritis (OA). This was a cross-sectional study of adults aged 50 years and older registered with four UK general practices who reported foot pain in the past year. Bilateral weightbearing dorsoplantar and lateral radiographs were obtained. Symptomatic radiographic midfoot OA was defined as midfoot pain in the last 4 weeks, combined with radiographic OA in one or more midfoot joints (first cuneometatarsal, second cuneometatarsal, navicular-first cuneiform, and talonavicular). Midfoot OA cases were matched 1:1 for sex and age to controls with a 5-year age tolerance. Eleven radiographic measures were extracted and compared between the groups using independent sample t-tests and effect sizes (Cohen's d). We identified 63 midfoot OA cases (mean ± SD age was 66.8 ± 8.0 years, with 32 male and 31 female participants) and matched these to 63 controls (mean ± SD age was 65.9 ± 7.8 years). There were no differences in metatarsal lengths between the groups. However, those with midfoot OA had a higher calcaneal-first metatarsal angle (d = 0.43, small effect size, P = 0.018) and lower calcaneal inclination angle (d = 0.46, small effect size, P = 0.011) compared with controls. People with midfoot OA have a flatter foot posture compared with controls. Although caution is required when inferring causation from cross-sectional data, these findings are consistent with a pathomechanical pathway linking foot structure to the development of midfoot OA. Prospective studies are required to determine the temporal relationships between foot structure, function, and the development of this common and disabling condition.

Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Nitinol Compression Staples for Midfoot and Chopart Arthrodesis

Category: Midfoot/Forefoot; Hindfoot Introduction/Purpose: Continuous compression implant (nitinol staples) use in orthopaedic surgery has increased in recent years. There are several advantages of nitinol staples, including a lower profile when compared to traditional fixation methods. They are easy to apply and take up a smaller footprint than most plating techniques, thus decreasing surgical time and dissection. Additionally, continuous compression across the fusion site is maintained during the resorptive phase of bone healing. Biomechanical studies provide useful data supporting the use of nitinol staples in the foot and ankle; however, clinical data is limited. This study’s purpose is to determine the efficacy of nitinol staples to achieve stable, bony healing in midfoot and Chopart joint arthrodesis, and examine their clinical outcomes, complications, and pain scores. Methods: A retrospective chart review was performed on 127 midfoot/Chopart joints (71 patients) that underwent arthrodesis using nitinol staples in isolation over a five-year period (January 2017 – February 2022). The primary outcome variable was radiographic evidence of healing. Radiographs were blinded, randomized, and independently reviewed by three board certified foot and ankle surgeons. Each investigator reviewed digital radiographs independently and recorded their radiographic finding responses. Fusions were deemed healed if greater than 50% of the arthrodesis site contained bridging bone. A partially healed arthrodesis was defined as some bridging bone, but less than 50% of the overall arthrodesis site, and a nonunion was defined as no healing seen radiographically or loss of reduction. There were no cases of complete inter-surgeon radiographic disagreement in this study. Pain scores and clinical outcomes were also collected. Smokers and diabetics represented 27% (n = 19) and 13% (n=9) of the patient population, respectively. Results: Complete/partial union was seen in 89% of all joints (113/127) and 93% of midfoot joints (98/106). Chopart joints had a significantly lower healing rate (15/21; 71%) compared to midfoot joints (p = 0.013) and TMT joints in isolation (86/91; 95%) (p = 0.006). Neuropathy and smoking had no effect on healing but diabetes did (p = 0.004). Joints requiring bone grafting had a worse healing rate (38/49; 76%) (p = 0.002). For all joints, post-operative VAS scores were significantly lower than pre-operative (p &lt; 0.00001). Midfoot and Chopart pre-operative pain scores did not differ (p= 0.30), but differed post-operatively (p = 0.003). Midfoot joints had significantly lower pain scores post-operatively than pre-operatively (p &lt; 0.00001). No such significance existed in Chopart joints (p = 0.070). Conclusion: Isolated nitinol staples are a viable option for midfoot arthrodesis, especially TMT joints, and offer significant pain improvement. Staples are lower profile, decreasing hardware irritation and potential secondary surgeries, and ease of use makes insertion efficient and reproducible. They offer the benefit of continuous compression of the fusion site, and are rigid enough to maintain reduction. Chopart joints, however, may require a more rigid fixation than nitinol staples can provide, given the lower healing rate. Caution should be exercised in diabetics and joints that may require bone grafting.

Return-to-sport following Operative Management of Lisfranc Injuries in Competitive Athletes

Category: Sports; Midfoot/Forefoot Introduction/Purpose: The relative incidence of Lisfranc injuries amongst competitive athletes is higher than the incidence in the general population. Lisfranc injuries can be particularly devastating to competitive athletes. They can dramatically hinder athletic performance, cause severe midfoot pain, and are difficult to diagnose. It is well documented that many Lisfranc injuries are initially misdiagnosed. To date, there is limited literature surrounding return-to-sport timelines and outcomes following operatively managed Lisfranc injuries in competitive athletes. The purpose of this study is to present an average return-to-sport timeline and patient-reported outcomes of surgically treated Lisfranc injuries in competitive athletes. Methods: Patients with surgically treated Lisfranc injuries by a single surgeon between May 2012 and February 2022 were identified through retrospective chart review. Competitive athletes and their levels of athletic competition were identified through clinical and surgical documentation. Patients with surgically treated Lisfranc injuries that were not active competitive athletes at the time of injury were excluded. Data from a novel Lisfranc return-to-sport survey was prospectively collected. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) analyzed included the visual analog scale (VAS) pain scale, Veterans RAND 12-Item Health Survey (VR-12), and the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM). PROMs with latest follow-up less than 12 months from the date of surgery were excluded from analysis. The differences between mean preoperative and mean latest follow-up outcome measures were analyzed using simple t tests with significance set at P&lt;.05. Results: Forty-six competitive athletes were surgically treated for Lisfranc injuries. All PROMs demonstrated statistically significant improvement upon latest follow-up except for the VR-12 Mental (Table 1). Nine patients (9/46) were lost to follow-up. Thirty- two patients (86.5%, 32/37) completed the Lisfranc return-to-sport survey at a mean follow-up time of 52.17 (range, 7.33-125.26) months after surgery. Twenty-eight patients (28/32) desired to return to play, and four did not (4/32). Twenty-seven patients (96.4%, 27/28) successfully returned to sport after an average of 5.5 (range, 3-12) months. Twenty-two patients (22/28) eventually returned to pre-injury levels of play, and six (6/28) did not. Average pain levels when returning to play were 26.2/100. Twenty- three patients (23/28) were eventually able to play pain free. Overall average patient satisfaction level was 95.6/100. Conclusion: This study is one of the largest known cohorts (n=46) of competitive athletes with operatively managed Lisfranc injuries to have return-to-sport time and PROMs analyzed. Overall, the return-to-sport rate, PROMs, and patient satisfaction levels were excellent for this cohort. Of the athletes who desired to return-to-sport, the return-to-sport rate was 96.4% with a mean return-to-sport time of 5.5 (range, 3-12) months after surgery. All PROMs (VAS, VR-12 Physical, FAAM) except for the VR- 12 Mental demonstrated statistically significant improvement at latest follow-up.

Republication of "Preliminary Experience Using Bioactive Glass Wedges for Cotton Osteotomy".

Medial cuneiform dorsal opening wedge (Cotton) osteotomy is often used for treating forefoot varus in patients undergoing surgery for stage II posterior tibialis tendon dysfunction. The goal of this study was to examine the radiographic outcomes of Cotton osteotomy with bioactive glass wedge to assess for both maintenance of correction and clinical results and complications. We hypothesized that bioactive glass wedges would maintain correction of the osteotomy with low complication rates. Between December 2015 and June 2016, the charts of 17 patients (10 female and 7 male) who underwent Cotton osteotomy using bioactive glass wedges were retrospectively reviewed. Patient age averaged 56.8 years (range, 16-84). The average follow-up was 6.5 months. Radiographs were reviewed to assess for initial correction and maintenance of correction of medial column sag as well as for union. Charts were reviewed for complications. The medial column sag correction averaged 15.6% on the final postoperative lateral radiograph. Meary angle averaged 19 degrees (3.14-42.8 degrees) preoperatively and 5.5 degrees (0.4-20.7 degrees) at final follow-up. All patients achieved clinical and radiographic union. One patient developed neuropathic midfoot pain and was managed with sympathetic blocks. One patient had a delayed union that healed at 6 months without surgical intervention. No patients required the use of custom orthotics or subsequent surgical procedures. Cotton osteotomy with bioactive glass wedges produced consistent correction of the medial column with low risk. Level IV, case series.

Resection of Bar in the Management of Calcaneonavicular Coalition: A Systematic Review.

The most commonly encountered type of tarsal coalition in symptomatic patients is the calcaneonavicular coalition. Non-surgical treatments are effective for most patients. However, if surgery is required, excision of the calcaneonavicular bar can be a successful option that preserves hindfoot mobility and function. We conducted a systematic review of calcaneonavicular bar excision in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P) checklist. To conduct the review, we conducted a thorough search of several databases, including PubMed, Cochrane, Excerpta Medica Database (EMBASE), Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Google Scholar, and bibliographies. We analyzed the chosen studies to collect information on patient demographics, clinical outcomes, surgical techniques, and potential complications. We identified 11 studies that included 274 patients for a total of 394 feet. The average age of patients in these studies was 12.5 years, ranging from 8.2 to 19.4 years. Follow-up periods varied from 2.3 to 23 years, with an average duration of 5.9 years. Excision of the calcaneonavicular bar was performed at 380 feet, while fusion was performed at 14 feet. In 50.5% of the feet, the extensor digitorum brevis was used as an interposition material. Successful outcomes after bar excision were observed in 82.9% of cases (304 feet) and were described as satisfactory, improved, good, or excellent outcomes. In one study, the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score improved from 47.89 to 90.22 in 12 feet after bar excision. Recurrence was reported in 52 feet out of the 380 feet that underwent bar excision. Progression of arthritis in the ankle and subtalar joint was reported in 25 feet. Various complications were reported, including paraesthesia in the hindfoot (three feet), midfoot pain (three feet), hindfoot pain (two feet), mild wound infection (one foot), and swelling and stiffness (one foot). Surgical excision of the calcaneonavicular bar has shown successful outcomes in most patients, regardless of the use of interposition material. These outcomes are associated with minimal and acceptable complications. However, since the studies conducted in the literature were single-center retrospective and prospective trials, a multicenter prospective study with patient-centered, validated outcomes would provide a better opportunity to support the evidence in favor of surgical excision of the calcaneonavicular bar. Overall, the use of various interposition materials is associated with reduced chances of recurrence compared to cases where no interposition material was used.

Patient Satisfaction and Pain Relief After Deep Peroneal Nerve Neurectomy for Midfoot Arthritis: A Preliminary Short Report.

The deep peroneal nerve (DPN) plays a role in afferent nociceptive dorsal midfoot joint pain perception. DPN neurectomy for treatment of symptomatic dorsal midfoot osteoarthritis allows early mobilization and weightbearing. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the patient satisfaction and pain relief after DPN neurectomy for treatment of chronic dorsal midfoot pain due to osteoarthritis. In this retrospective, IRB-approved, questionnaire-based study, we evaluated 48 patients (55 feet) with an average follow-up of 35.1 (range, 16-51) months who underwent DPN neurectomy at our institution between September 2017 and February 2021. There were 38 women and 10 men, 41 unilateral (22 right, 19 left) and 7 bilateral procedures, with an average age of 67.8 (range, 35-88) years at the time of surgery. A questionnaire that included questions regarding postsurgical dorsal midfoot pain relief, surgical result satisfaction, and current functional limitations was administered via telephone. Demographic information, patient responses, and complications were recorded. Of the 48 patients, 80.8% were satisfied with the result of the surgery in relieving their dorsal midfoot pain, 84.6% would repeat the surgery under the same circumstances, 83.8% would recommend the surgery to a friend, 10.4% reported they wish they had undergone arthrodesis, 91.7% reported pain relief in the first 6 months, and 55.6% reported current activity limitations. Six feet (10.9%) underwent a second procedure with an average postoperative time of 20.5 (range, 1-36) months. Complications included 1 hematoma and deep wound infection, 1 DPN neuroma and superficial peroneal nerve entrapment, and 4 patients with inadequate pain relief. In this cohort, DPN neurectomy appeared to be a reasonable surgical alternative to arthrodesis for the management of chronic dorsal midfoot pain due to midfoot osteoarthritis after failed nonoperative management. Level IV, retrospective case series.

Osteonecrosis of the Tarsal Navicular: Not Always Spontaneous!

Mueller-Weiss disease, a rare and complex foot condition, is defined as spontaneous and progressive navicular fragmentation leading to midfoot pain and deformity. However, its exact etiopathogenesis remains unclear. We report a case series of tarsal navicular osteonecrosis to describe the clinical and imaging characteristics and etiologic profile of the disease. This retrospective study included five women diagnosed as having tarsal navicular osteonecrosis. The following data were extracted from medical records: age, comorbidities, alcohol and tobacco consumption, history of trauma, clinical presentation, imaging modalities performed, treatment protocol, and outcomes. Five women with a mean age of 51.4 years (range, 39-68 years) were enrolled in the study. Mechanical pain and deformity over the dorsum of the midfoot was the main clinical presentation. Rheumatoid arthritis, granulomatosis with polyangiitis, and spondyloarthritis were reported by three patients. Radiographs revealed bilateral distribution in one patient. Three patients underwent computed tomography. It showed a fragmentation of the navicular bone in two cases.Magnetic resonance imaging was performed in one patient showing flattening of the lateral aspect of the navicular bone with signal abnormalities. Talonaviculocuneiform arthrodesis was performed in all of the patients. Mueller-Weiss disease-like changes may occur in patients with an underlying inflammatory disease such as rheumatoid arthritis and spondyloarthritis.

Operative outcomes of hallux valgus with painful osteoarthritis of the lesser tarsometatarsal joints

BackgroundHallux valgus is sometimes accompanied by osteoarthritis of the lesser tarsometatarsal joint. However, information on the operative procedures and outcomes for the treatment of hallux valgus with osteoarthritis of the lesser tarsometatarsal joint simultaneously is limited. We aimed to describe this operative procedure and evaluate the outcomes of the treatment of hallux valgus with osteoarthritis of the lesser tarsometatarsal joint. MethodsFifteen patients (17 feet; average age, 66.9 years; average follow-up, 59.4 months; and minimum follow-up, 24 months) with symptomatic hallux valgus accompanied by painful osteoarthritis of the lesser tarsometatarsal joint were enrolled. All feet showed osteoarthritis of the second and/or third tarsometatarsal joint on dorsoplantar weight-bearing radiograph. The operative procedure included a proximal osteotomy of the first metatarsal and arthrodesis of the lesser tarsometatarsal joint with an autologous bone graft. ResultsThe mean Japanese Society for Surgery of the Foot hallux metatarsophalangeal-interphalangeal score significantly improved from 54.8 points preoperatively to 91.7 points postoperatively (P <0.001). The mean postoperative visual analog score (15 feet) was 1.0 (0–3.9). Preoperative midtarsal pain disappeared in 14 feet and decreased in one foot postoperatively. Preoperative metatarsalgia was found in five feet, of which, it disappeared in two feet, decreased in two feet, and transferred to another region in one foot at the latest follow-up. The mean hallux valgus and intermetatarsal angles were 42.4° and 18.4° preoperatively, which decreased significantly to 12.5° and 6.9° postoperatively, respectively (P <0.001, all). Recurrence of hallux valgus (hallux valgus angle ≥20°) was observed in two feet (11.8%). Nonunion of the third tarsometatarsal joint was observed in one foot (3.1% among 32 joints). ConclusionsThe clinical and radiographic results indicated that operative treatment for hallux valgus with painful osteoarthritis of the lesser tarsometatarsal joint significantly improves forefoot and midfoot pain and function and has low complication rates. Level of evidenceLevel IV, retrospective case series.

Bone Marrow Lesions and Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Detected Structural Abnormalities in Patients With Midfoot Pain and Osteoarthritis: A Cross-Sectional Study.

To compare magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-detected structural abnormalities in patients with symptomatic midfoot osteoarthritis (OA), patients with persistent midfoot pain, and asymptomatic controls, and to explore the association between MRI features, pain, and foot-related disability. One hundred seven adults consisting of 50 patients with symptomatic and radiographically confirmed midfoot OA, 22 adults with persistent midfoot pain but absence of radiographic OA, and 35 asymptomatic adults underwent 3T MRI of the midfoot and clinical assessment. MRIs were read for the presence and severity of abnormalities (bone marrow lesions [BMLs], subchondral cysts, osteophytes, joint space narrowing [JSN], effusion-synovitis, tenosynovitis, and enthesopathy) using the Foot Osteoarthritis MRI Score. Pain and foot-related disability were assessed with the Manchester Foot Pain and Disability Index. The severity sum score of BMLs in the midfoot was greater in patients with midfoot pain and no signs of OA on radiography compared to controls (P=0.007), with a pattern of involvement in the cuneiform-metatarsal joints similar to that in patients with midfoot OA. In univariable models, BMLs (ρ=0.307), JSN (ρ=0.423), and subchondral cysts (ρ=0.302) were positively associated with pain (P < 0.01). In multivariable models, MRI abnormalities were not associated with pain and disability when adjusted for covariates. In individuals with persistent midfoot pain but no signs of OA on radiography, MRI findings suggested an underrecognized prevalence of OA, particularly in the second and third cuneiform-metatarsal joints, where BML patterns were consistent with previously recognized sites of elevated mechanical loading. Joint abnormalities were not strongly associated with pain or foot-related disability.

The diagnostic and therapeutic challenges of medial plantar neuropathy in jogger's foot: a case report

Jogger's foot is characterised by a neuropathic pain along the medial arch of the foot caused by compression of the medial plantar nerve. It is more common in runners, especially when there is an anatomical predisposition or some extrinsic factor that may exert compression on the nerve. This article presents the case of a 59-year-old man, who had pain and paraesthesia along the medial plantar arch of the left foot, lasting for several months. Despite having undergone some conservative treatments (plantar orthosis and physiotherapy) and minimal invasive procedures (cortico-anaesthetic injection and shockwave therapy) the symptoms persisted and amyotrophy of the abductor hallucis muscle became clinically evident. At this point, a magnetic resonance image was taken, showing compression of the medial plantar nerve at the intersection of the flexor hallucis longus and the flexor digitorum longus tendons. Ultrasound-guided treatment with pulsed radiofrequency of the medial plantar nerve was then proposed to try and modulate his chronic neuropathic pain. After the procedure, the patient reported immediate relief of the symptoms, which were maintained over 6 months of follow up after the procedure. This case report illustrates a rare and frequently misdiagnosed cause of midfoot pain and its management using electromagnetic modulation of peripheral nerves by pulsed radiofrequency. This seems to be an effective technique, with long-lasting results.

18 Does overweight enhance foot disorders in patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis?

BackgroundJuvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) is chronic inflammatory arthritis of childhood that may result in persistent and disabling foot impairments. Foot disorders are common in JIA with a prevalence estimated at over 90%. Many factors can worsen foot disorders in these patients. The influence of weight on foot disorders is poorly studied.ObjectivesTo examine associations between weight and foot disorders in patients with JIA.MethodsPatients with a diagnosis of JIA, based on the International League of Associations for Rheumatology (ILAR) criteria were included. Age, gender, weight, characteristics of the disease and of foot pain were noted. A specialized podiatric examination was performed.ResultsThirty-two patients were included. The mean age was 12.2 ± 2.9 [5–18]. Forty-three percent of the patients were boys (n = 14). The mean age of disease onset was 8.5 ± 3.9 [3–15]. Only one patient had a triggering factor (elbow fracture). The most common type of JIA was oligoarthritis in 12 cases, then enthesitis-related in 8 cases, polyarthritis without rheumatoid factor in 3 cases, polyarthritis with positive rheumatoid factor in 1 case, psoriatic arthritis in 3 cases, systemic arthritis in 1 case and undifferentiated arthritis in 4 cases.The mean weight was 43.5 kg [17–98]. Only 28% (n = 9) of the children had a normal weight for their age, 41% (n = 13) of them had a low weight for their age and 31% (n = 10) of them had overweight. Ten patients had foot pain: hindfoot pain in 5 patients, midfoot pain in 3 patients, and forefoot pain in 2 patients. Foot deformities were found in 78.1% of the patients (n = 27): flat foot in 39% (n = 13) of the patients and pes cavus in 39% (n = 13).There was no association between overweight and foot pain (p = 0,14) or hindfoot pain (p = 0.08). However, overweight was associated with a forefoot (p = 0.01) and midfoot (p = 0.01) pain. Overweight was not associated with foot deformities (p = 0.1).ConclusionThis study showed that weight is associated with foot pain especially forefoot and midfoot pain. A healthy lifestyle and a normal weight are fundamental to preventing foot pain at an early age in patients with JIA and improving their quality of life.