MICS CABG Research Articles

Minimally Invasive Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting for Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease: A Systematic Review.

We conducted a systematic review of all available evidence on the feasibility and safety of minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting (MICS CABG) in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease (CAD). A systematic literature search in PubMed, MEDLINE via Ovid, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science was performed to identify all relevant studies evaluating outcomes of MICS CABG among patients with multivessel CAD and including at least 15 patients with no restriction on the publication date. A total of 881 studies were identified, of which 26 studies met the eligibility criteria. The studies included a total of 7,556 patients. The average patient age was 63.3 years (range 49.5 to 69.0 years), male patients were an average of 77.8% (54.0% to 89.8%), and body mass index was 29.8 kg/m2 (24.5 to 30.1 kg/m2). Early mortality and stroke were on average 0.6% (range 0% to 2.0%) and 0.4% (range 0% to 1.3%), respectively. The average number of grafts was 2.8 (range 2.1 to 3.7). The average length of hospital stay was 5.6 days (range 3.1 to 9.3 days). MICS CABG appears to be a safe method in well-selected patients with multivessel CAD. This approach is concentrated at dedicated centers, and there is no widespread application, although it has potential to be widely applicable as an alternative for surgical revascularization. However, large randomized controlled studies with longer follow-up are still required to compare the outcomes with conventional CABG and other revascularization strategies.

Minimally Invasive Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in a Low-Risk Asian Cohort: A Propensity-Score Matched Study.

Minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting (MICS CABG) offers a new paradigm in coronary revascularization. This study aims to compare the outcomes of MICS CABG with those of conventional median sternotomy CABG (MS CABG) within a growing minimally invasive cardiac surgical program in Singapore. Propensity matching produced 111 patient pairs who underwent MICS CABG or MS CABG between January 2009 and February 2020 at the National University Heart Centre, Singapore. Minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass surgery patients were matched to single- or double-graft MS CABG patients (Group 1). Multivessel MICS CABG patients were matched to MS CABG patients with equal number of grafts (Group 2). Overall, MICS CABG patients experienced shorter postoperative length of stay (P<0.071). In Group 2, procedural duration (P<0.001) was longer among MICS CABG patients, but it did not translate to adverse postoperative events. Postoperative outcomes, including 30-day mortality, reopening for bleeding, new onset atrial fibrillation as well as neurological, pulmonary, renal, and infectious complications were comparable between MICS and MS CABG groups. MICS CABG is a safe and effective approach for surgical revascularization of coronary artery disease and trends toward a reduction in hospital stay.

The efficacy of minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting (mics cabg) for patients with coronary artery diseases and diabetes: a single center retrospective study

Backgroundconventional coronary artery bypass grafting (CCABG) tends to cause severe complications in patients with comorbid Coronary Artery Diseases (CAD) and diabetes. On the other hand, the Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (MICS CABG) via transthoracic incision is associated with rapid recovery and reduced complications. Adding to the limited literature, this study compares CCABG and MICS CABG in terms of efficacy and safety.MethodsHerein, 104 CCABG and MICS CABG cases (52 cases each) were included. The patients were recruited from the Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery Center, Anzhen Hospital, between January 2017 and December 2021 and were selected based on the Propensity Score Matching (PSM) model. The key outcomes included All-cause Death, Myocardial Infarction (MI), Cerebrovascular Events, revascularization, Adverse Wound Healing Events and one-year patency of the graft by coronary CTA.ResultsCompared to CCABG, MICS CABG had longer surgical durations [4.25 (1.50) h vs.4.00 (1.13) h, P = 0.028], but showed a reduced intraoperative blood loss [600.00 (400.00) mL vs.700.00 (300.00) mL, P = 0.032] and a lower secondary incision debridement and suturing rate (5.8% vs.19.2%, P = 0.038). In follow up, no statistically significant differences were found between the two groups in the cumulative Major Adverse Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Events (MACCEs) incidence (7.7% vs. 5.9%), all-cause mortality (0 vs. 0), MI incidence (1.9% vs. 2.0%), cerebral apoplexy incidence (5.8% vs. 3.9%), and repeated revascularization incidence (0 vs. 0) (P > 0.05). Additionally, coronary CTA results revealed that the two groups’ one-year graft patency (94.2% vs. 90.2%, P = 0.761) showed no statistically significant difference.ConclusionIn patients with comorbid CAD and diabetes, MICS CABG and CCABG had comparable revascularization performances. Moreover, MICS CABG can effectively reduce, if not prevent, poor clinical outcomes/complications, including incision healing, sternal infection and prolonged length of stay in diabetes patients.

MICS CABG: Preoperative and perioperative evaluation.

MICS CABG: Preoperative and perioperative evaluation.

Minimally invasive coronary artery bypass (MICS CABG) in Bosnia and Herzegovina: a single centre, single surgeon cohort experience.

Aim This is the first research in Bosnia and Herzegovina presenting minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting surgery (MICS CABG) experience, advantages, and outcomes as compared to conventional surgery (OPEN CABG). Methods This retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted between January 2019 and November 2022 and included patients with indication for surgical revascularization. Results Among 237 patients, males predominated, 182 (76.7%), with a mean body mass index (BMI) of 28.4±3.9, median The Society of Thoracic Surgery Risk (STS) score of 1.55 (0.8, 4.0), short term STS score of 11.2 (6.8, 23.7), mean age of 64.8±8.7 (ranging 41-83) years, 122 (51.4%) underwent OPEN CABG and 115 (48.6%) MICS CABG. MICS CABG took less time (p<0.001; OPEN 3.5±0.8h; MICS 2.8±0.8h) and needed less mechanical ventilation (p<0.001, OPEN 17.3±11.9h; MICS 13.0±12.5h) than OPEN CABG. Even though there was no difference in hospitalization length between groups (OPEN (7.5±3.2), MICS (7.1±4.0)), patients receiving MICS (2.9±1.5) spent less time in the ICU (p=0.0013) than OPEN CABG (3.6±2.8). OPEN CABG used also more blood derivatives, red blood cells (OPEN 292 vs MICS 55), plasma (OPEN 270 vs MICS 86) and platelets (OPEN 71 vs MICS 28). Conclusion Patients undergoing MICS CABG in Bosnia and Herzegovina had less mechanical ventilation hours and less ICU duration compared to OPEN CABG even though the hospitalization duration was very similar. MICS CABG takes less time to be conducted, has fewer CPRs postoperatively, uses less blood derivatives including red blood cells, plasma and platelets.

Surgery for gastric cancer in patients with coronary heart disease (clinical cases)

The importance of a multidisciplinary approach in the surgical treatment of patients with severe combined oncological and cardiovascular pathologies is shown. In modern surgery, there is a place for both simultaneous and staged surgical treatment of this category of patients, which should be determined in each specific clinical case and requires an individual multidisciplinary approach with the inclusion in the discussion of such specialists as an oncosurgeon, a chemotherapist, a radiation therapist, a cardiologist/therapist, cardiovascular surgeon, anesthesiologist and resuscitator.&#x0D; Two clinical cases of a two-stage and one-stage surgical approach in the treatment of patients with competing gastric cancer and coronary heart disease are presented. One 47-year-old patient underwent two-stage surgical treatment: stage 1 aortocoronary bypass grafting from mini-thoracotomy (MICS CABG); stage 2 robot-assisted distal subtotal resection of the stomach (Balfour modification) with D2 lymphadenectomy, formation of intracorporeal gastroenteroanastomosis and interintestinal anastomosis according to Brown. Another 74-year-old patient underwent a one-stage surgical intervention: autovenous coronary artery bypass grafting of the anterior interventricular artery, posterior descending coronary artery on a beating heart, without cardiopulmonary bypass + extended-combined gastrectomy with resection of the distal esophagus, resection of the diaphragm, and D2+ lymphadenectomy. The postoperative period proceeded without complications.

Ninety-seven cases of experiences with the left thoracotomy approach for off-pump conventional revascularization: a retrospective cohort study.

Minimally invasive coronary surgery-coronary artery bypass grafting (MICS CABG) is well adopted in clinical practice. However, this procedure did not really achieve conventional complete revascularization. The present study aimed to explore the feasibility and safety of conventional revascularization via the left thoracotomy (8-10 cm) approach. From January 2020 to March 2022, a total of 97 consecutive patients who needed coronary artery revascularization were operated on using this technique. The patients' preoperative, intraoperative, postoperative, and follow-up data were collected. Perioperative variables were compared between the single graft and non-single graft groups. All patients received dual-source computerized tomographic angiography at 1-week postoperatively to evaluate the graft patency and detect pulmonary embolism and aortic dissection. The patients were followed up for 3-27 months. The mean age of the entire cohort was 61.5±8.8 years, there were 16 (16.5%) female patients, and 1-4 grafts were performed per patient. There were no conversions to median sternotomy or on-pump CABG. The average number of grafts was 1.9±0.9, and that of the non-single graft group was 2.5±0.6. Among the 97 included patients, one patient in the single graft group suffered from aspiration pneumonia after a stroke and died. The 30-day mortality was 1.0% (one patient), one patient required re-exploration for bleeding (1.1%), and a total of 191 grafts were performed. All grafts were unobstructed except for one graft to the obtuse marginal branch (OM) (0.5%). Follow-up was performed by phone or via outpatient visits and was available for 92 patients (95%). During the follow-up period, 1 (1.1%) patient suffered an acute myocardial infarction and received percutaneous coronary intervention with no redo-surgery. All patients are alive and angina-free. Left thoracotomy for conventional revascularization is a safe procedure for appropriately selected patients, with few early complications and good early and mid-term results. More cases are ongoing and long-term results are in observation.

Clinical efficacy evaluation of minimally invasive cardiac surgery coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease

Objective: To investigate the clinical efficacy of minimally invasive cardiac surgery coronary artery bypass grafting (MICS CABG) in the treatment of patients with multivessel coronary artery disease. Methods: A total of 147 patients with multi-vessel coronary artery disease and coronary heart disease who underwent surgical treatment in Henan Provincial People's Hospital from March 2016 to March 2019 were retrospectively selected. Of which, 69 patients were treated by MICS CABG (minimally invasive group) and 78 patients were treated using the traditional thoracotomy (traditional group). The perioperative indexes, serum myocardial enzyme indexes and renal function indexes of patients before and after operation were compared between the two groups; Two groups of patients were followed up for 2 years; the incidence of adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) was recorded, and survival analysis was performed. Results: The age of the patients in the minimally invasive group and the traditional group were (66.9±5.8) and (68.2±7.0) years old, respectively, and the proportions of males were 60.9% (42 cases) and 51.3% (40 cases) (all P>0.05). All patients in the two groups successfully completed the operation, and no patients in the minimally invasive group were converted to thoracotomy. Before surgery, there was no significant difference in serum cTnI, CK-MB, BUN, Scr, and creatinine clearance between the minimally invasive group and the traditional group (all P>0.05). After re-examination 48 hours after operation, the serum cTnI in the minimally invasive group was (3.109±0.664) μg/L, and the CK-MB was (18.03±3.27) U/L, which were lower than those in the traditional group (3.438±0.715) μg/L, (20.63±4.28) U/L; the difference was statistically significant (all P<0.05). During the 2-year follow-up, there was no statiscally significant difference in the incidence of recurrent myocardial infarction, postoperative atrial fibrillation, postoperative stroke, arrhythmia, heart failure, thrombosis, cardiac death, and MACE events between the minimally invasive group and the traditional group. Statistical significance (all P>0.05). The survival curve analysis showed that the cumulative rates of MACE events in the minimally invasive and traditional groups were 17.39% and 26.92%, respectively (P=0.171). Conclusions: The effect of MICS CABG in the treatment of patients with multivessel coronary artery disease and coronary heart disease is not much different from that of traditional open thoracotomy, but the former is less traumatic, quicker after surgery, and has clinical significance for the recovery of patients' myocardial function.

Comparison of early outcomes associated with coronary artery bypass grafting for multi-vessel disease conducted using minimally invasive or conventional off-pump techniques: a propensity-matched study based on SYNTAX score

BackgroundThis study was designed to compare early outcomes associated with coronary artery bypass grafting for multi-vessel disease conducted using either minimally invasive or conventional off-pump techniques.MethodsFrom January 2017 through January 2021, 582 patients with multi-vessel lesion coronary artery disease underwent either minimally invasive cardiac surgery coronary artery bypass grafting (MICS CABG) or conventional off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCABG) treatment by our team at Anzhen Hospital. Patients in the MICS CABG group were propensity score-matched with those in the OPCABG at a 1:1 ratio (MICS CABG = 172; OPCABG = 172), using epidemiological data, preoperative clinical characteristics, and SYNTAX score as covariates. Perioperative outcomes and 6-month computed tomography angiography findings were compared between these groups.ResultsNo significant differences between groups were observed with respect to 30-day postoperative mortality, myocardial infarction, and stroke incidence. Surgical data indicated that the MICS CABG procedure was able to cover all three main arterial territories with a relatively low need for circulatory assistance. The MICS CABG procedure was associated with a longer operative duration, but was also associated with higher postoperative hemoglobin and activities of daily living index values as well as a shorter duration of postoperative hospitalization (P < 0.05). No differences in 6-month graft patency were observed between groups.ConclusionsMICS CABG is a safe, less invasive alternative to OPCABG when performing complete revascularization provided patients are properly selected, yielding similar in-hospital outcomes and 6-month graft patency rates together with an earlier return of physical function.

Surgical Challenges in Multi-Vessel Minimally Invasive Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.

Objectives Minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting (MICS CABG) has emerged as an alternative treatment for patients with multi-vessel coronary artery disease, but there are certain surgical challenges inherent in the adoption of this approach. The present study was conducted to provide insight regarding the outcomes associated with our first 118 cases, to discuss the surgical difficulties encountered in these patients, and to outline the potential countermeasures. Methods Between January 2017 and January 2020, 118 patients underwent multi-vessel MICS CABG. These patients were stratified into two groups based upon whether they did or did not experience surgical challenges, and early clinical outcomes were compared between these groups to assess the incidence of technical difficulties and associated factors. Results Surgical challenges arose in 38 of the 118 cases in this study, including 13 cases of exposure-related difficulties, 11 cases of proximal anastomosis-related difficulties, 15 cases of distal anastomosis-related difficulties, 4 cases of LITA-related difficulties, and 3 cases of lung-related difficulties. Relative to the other 80 patients, those patients for whom intraoperative technical challenges arose experience significant increases in operative duration (4.94 ± 0.89 vs. 5.59 ± 1.11 h, P=0.001), intraoperative blood loss (667 ± 313 vs. 892 ± 532 mL, P=0.005), length of the ICU admission (17.59 ± 3.51 vs. 22.59 ± 17.31 h, P=0.015), and the duration of postoperative hospitalization (5.96 ± 1.23 vs. 6.71 ± 1.92 days, P=0.012). There were no significant differences between these groups with respect to the mean graft number, major complications such as stroke or organ dysfunction, or one-year graft patency. Conclusions There is a substantial learning curve associated with performing off-pump MICS CABG to treat multi-vessel disease. Surgical challenges encountered during this procedure may increase the operative duration, intraoperative blood loss, ICU admission, and the duration of postoperative hospitalization. However, these issues do not appear to compromise the efficacy of complete revascularization, and early clinical outcomes associated with this procedure remain acceptable.

Less invasive multivessel coronary artery bypass grafting: now is the time.

Less invasive multivessel coronary artery bypass grafting techniques have seen a progressive evolution over the last two decades. In their current state, they are easily reproduced and applicable to most patients requiring multivessel revascularization. The purpose of this review is to highlight their importance among a spectrum of evolving therapies and the accruing evidence in their favour. The first large dual center experience with minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting (MICS CABG) demonstrated the feasibility of performing multivessel surgical revascularization without the need for sternotomy or cardiopulmonary bypass. Subsequent angiographic studies to assess graft patency showed excellent early results. Studies comparing MICS CABG to conventional CABG demonstrate faster recovery while reducing hospitalization and cost. Multivessel less invasive coronary artery bypass grafting is basically limited to two procedures, MICS CABG and robotically assisted totally endoscopic CABG (TECAB). MICS CABG has evolved as a procedure that preserves the safety and efficacy of conventional CABG while avoiding the associated morbidity. It is reproducible, versatile and holds promise as the procedure of choice for multivessel coronary revascularization in the future. TECAB is likely the pinnacle of minimally invasive coronary surgery, the growth of which is hindered by widespread acceptance and industry involvement.

Minimally Invasive Multiple Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting with Composite Graft Using in situ Right Gastroepiploic and Radial Arteries.

Minimally invasive surgery/coronary artery bypass grafting (MICS CABG) via left thoracotomy and multiple CABG is a reported alternative to the standard sternotomy approach. However, harvesting the right internal thoracic artery (RITA) under direct vision requires high surgical skill. We describe MICS CABG with the left internal thoracic artery (LITA) and a composite graft using the in situ right gastroepiploic artery (GEA) and radial artery (RA) to achieve complete coronary revascularization. No complications occurred, and postoperative computed tomography showed patency of all grafts. Our experience suggests that this composite graft can be used safely and effectively in MICS CABG for complete arterial revascularization without difficulty.

Evaluation of bypass grafts after minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting according to the results of MSCT- angiography

Abstract Background Minithoracotomy avoids the complications specific to sternotomy access, which in turn creates the conditions for early activation and rehabilitation of patients, especially elderly, with diabetes mellitus, obesity, disorders of the musculo-skeletal system. Purpose To assess the patency of grafts after minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting (MICS CABG). Methods We analyzed the results of 50 MSCT- angiography made to patients with MICS CABG operated between 2014 and 2016 (28,5±13,5 months after surgery). Totally 132 conduits were used, 47 (35.6%) of them – arterial, 85 (64.4%) – venous. In all cases left internal mammary artery (LIMA) was used for revascularization of the left anterior descending artery (LAD). The great saphenous vein was used as a conduit for revascularization of: diagonal branch (DA) – 10 (11.7%) cases, left circumflex artery (LCx) – 44 (51.8%), right coronary artery (RCA) – 12 (14.1%), posterior interventricular branch – 19 (22.4%). Assessment of the patency of grafts were performed: 1–2 years (33 conduits: 13 arterial, 20 venous), after 2–3 years (51 conduits: 19 arterial, 32 venous) and after 3–4 years (48 conduits: 15 arterial, 33 venous). Results Assessment of coronary grafts patency in the first period revealed occlusion of 3 (15%) venous conduits. In 2 cases, the venous conduit was anastomosed with the LCx, in 1 case with the RCA. The cumulative patency of the grafts was as follows: arterial – 100%, venous – 85%. In the second point of the study occlusion and stenotic changes of LIMA has not been revealed. Determined occlusion 5 (15,6%) venous grafts. In all cases, the occluded venous conduits revascularized the RCA. Total permeability of conduits: arterial – 100%, venous-84.4%. In the third time interval it was revealed: in 1 case of LIMA occlusion and 7 venous grafts, in 4 cases in the area of the LCx, in 2 – DA and in 1 case – in the area of the RCA. Total patency of grafts: arterial – 93.3%, venous – 78.8%. Total permeability of conduits: arterial – 97.9%, venous – 82.4%. Conclusion The analysis shows good long–term results of the functioning of grafts after MICS CABG and their comparability with the results of patency of the conduits after CABG performed by the traditional Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

Feasibility and safety of minimally invasive cardiac coronary artery bypass grafting surgery for patients with multivessel coronary artery disease: Early outcome and short-mid-term follow up results

To explore the feasibility, safety and mid-term outcome of minimally invasive cardiac surgery coronary artery bypass grafting (MICS CABG) surgery. Data of patients who underwent MICS CABG between November 2015 and November 2017 in Peking University Third Hospital were retrospectively analyzed. Results were compared with the patients who underwent off-pump coronary aortic bypass grafting (OPCABG) surgery over the same period. The two groups were matched in propensity score matching method according to age, gender, left ventricular ejection fraction, body mass index, severity of coronary artery disease, smoking, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, renal insufficiency, history of cerebrovascular accident, and history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). There were 85 patients in MICS CABG group, including 68 males (80.0%) and 17 females (20%), with an average age of (63.8±8.7) years; 451 patients were enrolled in OPCABG group, and 85 patients were matched by propensity score as control group (OPCABG group). There was no significant difference in general clinical characteristics (P>0.05). The average grafts of MICS CABG and OPCABG were 2.35±0.83 and 2.48±0.72 respectively (P=0.284). No conversion to thoracotomy in MICS CABG group or cardiopulmonary bypass in neither group occurred. There was no significant difference in the major adverse cardiovascular events (MACCEs, 1.17% vs. 3.52%), reoperation (2.34 vs. 3.52%), new-onset atrial fibrillation rate (4.70% vs. 3.52%) or new-onset renal insufficiency rate (1.17% vs. 0%) between MICS CABG group and OPCABG group (P>0.05). The operation time in MICS CABG group was longer than that in OPCABG group [(282.8±55.8) min vs. (246.8±56.9) min, P < 0.05], while the time of ventilator supporting(16.9 h vs. 29.6 h), hospitalization in ICU [(29.3±20.8) h vs. (51.5±48.3) h] and total hospitalization [(18.3±3.2) d vs. (25.7±4.2) d] in MICS CABG group were shorter than those in OPCABG group (P < 0.05). The total patency rate (A+B levels) of MICS CABG was 96.5% after surgery. There was no significant difference in MACCEs rate between the two groups [1.18%(1/85) vs. 3.61%(3/83), P>0.05] in 1-year follow up. The MICS CABG surgery is a safe and feasible procedure with good clinical results in early and mid-term follow-up.

Is Postoperative Pain Different in the MICS CABG Cohort V. the Traditional Sternotomy Cohort Study?

Bradley C Tenny* and Jeko M Madjarov Author Affiliations Sanger Heart and Vascular Institute, Atrium Health, USA Received: July 16, 2020 | Published: August 05, 2020 Corresponding author: Tenny, Bradley C, Sanger Heart and Vascular Institute, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC USA DOI: 10.26717/BJSTR.2020.29.004785

Minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting: useful routine option for coronary revascularization in selected cases.

The safety and feasibility of minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting (MICS CABG) were evaluated. From December 2012 to March 2019, 122 consecutive patients underwent MICS CABG via a left mini-thoracotomy under direct vision. The internal thoracic artery (ITA) was harvested from all, while bilateral ITAs (BITAs) were used in 36 patients, with the second ITA as an in situ (n = 18) or free (n = 18) graft. Proximal anastomosis of the free graft (ITA, radial artery, or saphenous vein segments) was performed directly onto the ascending aorta, or from the ITA as a Y- or I-composite graft. Patient ages ranged from 38 to 89years (mean 66.9 ± 9.6years) and 102 were males. MICS CABG was completed without conversion in 116 patients (95.1%), of whom 76 underwent multivessel bypass grafting, with 2 grafts used in 52 and 3 or more in 24 patients. A cardiopulmonary bypass was performed in 17 patients. Perioperative mortality occurred in 1 patient who died of advanced cancer. There were no cases of reoperation for bleeding, stroke, or chest wound infection. The perioperative transfusion rate was 11.2%. Early graft patency was noted in 97.1%. The rate of freedom from major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (all-cause death, myocardial infarction, stroke, and repeated revascularization) was 89.7% at 5years. MICS CABG is feasible and showed good mid-term outcomes. BITAs can be harvested with this approach; thus, allowing for various graft designs. We recommend this as a useful option for coronary revascularization in selected cases.

ANGIOGRAPHIC EVALUATION OF GRAFT PATENCY AFTER MINIMALLY INVASIVE MULTIVESSEL CORONARY BYPASS SURGERY

The OBJECTIVE was to demonstrate perioperative outcomes and angiographic graft patency rates in the mediumterm period in patients after multivessel minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting (MICS CABG) procedures.MATERIAL AND METHODS. In the period from 2014 to 2019, 270 patients with stable forms of coronary artery disease were operated on. All patients received left internal thoracic artery (LITA) and venous or arterial (radial artery) grafts. Off-pump surgery was performed in 264 cases (97.8 %). 127 patients underwent CT-bypass angiography (CT-BA) on a 128-slice computed tomography at least after 1 year after the operation. Mean follow-up duration was (30.3±7.9) months.RESULTS. All patients received full myocardial revascularization. Mean number of grafts was (2.6±0.5). Perioperative mortality rate was 0.4 % (1 patient). Perioperative myocardial infarctions or cerebrovascular accident occurred in 3 (1.1 %) and 1 (0.4 %) patients. Overall graft patency rate in examined patients was 89.8 % (290 of 323). At the time of LITA, the patency of mammary grafts was 98.4 % (124 of 126), venous graft –84.0 % (163 of 194) and radial artery grafts – 100 % (3 of 3).CONCLUSION. MICS CABG was safe and effective and was characterized by minimal rate of perioperative complications. This procedure allowed to achieve complete revascularization of the myocardium without sternotomy and could be performed off-pump (in most cases). MICS CABG provide excellent long-term graft patency rates.The authors declare no conflict of interest.The authors confirm that they respect the rights of the people participated in the study, including obtaining informed consent when it is necessary, and the rules of treatment of animals when they are used in the study. Author Guidelines contains the detailed information.

Outcomes of Bilateral Internal Thoracic Arteries in Minimally Invasive Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting With Analogy to the SYNTAX Trial

Minimally invasive CABG is making positive strides in the evolution of coronary artery bypass surgery. We carried out a retrospective study of the efficacy and outcomes of the usage of bilateral internal thoracic arteries in MICS CABG patients over a 6 year period using primary (MACCE) and secondary outcome measures and also carried out a subgroup analysis of patients with diabetes and methodology of revascularization, and with analogy to the SYNTAX trial of the relative risk. Nine hundred and forty patients underwent multivessel MICS CABG via a left mini-thoracotomy from August 2011 to September 2017 and complete revascularization was done using the left internal thoracic artery-right internal thoracic artery Y (LITA-RITA Y) composite conduit. Efficacy and outcomes were evaluated by primary (MACCE) and secondary outcome measures including total length of stay, return to full physical activity, and quality of life. Propensity score matched analyses were carried out in diabetics, in the methodology of revascularization (MICS OPCABG vs. MICS ONCABG), and by comparison to the SYNTAX trial for relative risk. Mean follow-up was 2.9 years (maximum was 5.6 years). Out of the 940 patients, 843 (89.6%) were diabetic and 97 (10.4%) were nondiabetic. Average grafts were 3.2. There were 9 mortalities (0.9%). The average ICU and hospital stay was 40 ± 12 hours and 3.1 days. Ten patients (1.06%) required reintervention by angioplasty. A total of 99.3% patients were free from major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) at follow-up. Mean follow-up was 33 months and 846 (90%) of the patients were followed up. Based on propensity score-matched groups, patients who had their surgery done by MICS ONCABG (beating heart technique) had greater mean number of grafts and hospital length of stay and had significantly longer ICU stay, extubation in OR and blood loss in comparison to patients who had their CABG done by the MICS OPCABG technique. The new technique has shown favorable risk reduction in comparison to both the arms of the SYNTAX trial. The safety, efficacy and outcomes of minimally invasive CABG evaluated by primary (MACCE) and secondary outcomes and quality-of-life measures have been good in this study, especially in diabetics, and have shown results better than conventional CABG. The learning curve can be safely negotiated by using peripheral cardiopulmonary bypass assistance and comparison with the SYNTAX trial has shown a relative reduction in all-cause risk.

Minimally Invasive coronary surgery compared to STernotomy coronary artery bypass grafting: The MIST trial

RationaleMinimally invasive cardiac surgery has emerged as a safe alternative to standard cardiac surgery. Minimally invasive coronary surgery (MICS CABG) was developed to allow adequate exposure and complete revascularization in CABG from a small thoracotomy incision without cardiopulmonary bypass. Multiple studies have reported significant shorter length of hospital stay and earlier postoperative physical recovery for MICS CABG patients when compared to sternotomy CABG patients. However, there have been no convincing clinical trials that demonstrate improvement in post-operative quality of life for patients who undergo MICS CABG. Study designThe Minimally Invasive Coronary Surgery compared to Sternotomy Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (MIST) trial is a multi-centered, prospective randomized controlled trial that compares the quality of life and recovery in the early post-operative period between patients undergoing MICS CABG versus patients undergoing sternotomy CABG. Patients will be randomized either to the MICS CABG group or the sternotomy CABG group, and the target enrollment is 88 patients per group. The primary outcome is quality of life assessment performed by SF-36 questionnaire at 1 month. ConclusionThe MIST trial is the first prospective study that compares the quality of life between MICS CABG and sternotomy CABG patients. The results of this trial may enhance the procedural desirability of MICS CABG by patients and provide an incentive for surgeons and institutions to increase the availability of MICS CABG in suitable patients.

Initiation and modification of minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting

Minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting (MICS CABG) via a small left thoracotomy has been proposed as an alternative to standard coronary artery bypass grafting. However, this technique is still limited to skillful surgeons. Off-pump multi-vessel bypass grafting and the use of bilateral internal thoracic arteries are particularly challenging via a small thoracotomy, while they are widely performed via a full median sternotomy. The purpose of this review is to serve as a guide for the proper introduction of MICS CABG in the current era. We examine the advances, current techniques, outcomes and learning curves of MICS CABG and discuss the safe introduction.