Micropulse Yellow Laser Research Articles

Ranibizumab Monotherapy versus Ranibizumab Combined with Adjuvant Subthreshold Micropulse Yellow Laser in Treatment of Diabetic Macular Edema

Ranibizumab Monotherapy versus Ranibizumab Combined with Adjuvant Subthreshold Micropulse Yellow Laser in Treatment of Diabetic Macular Edema

Safety and efficacy of subthreshold micropulse yellow laser for persistent subretinal fluid after scleral bucking a randomized clinical trial

Persistent subretinal fluid (PSF) after scleral bucking of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment may delay recovery and affect the final visual quality, but with no effective treatment. This study firstly investigated the safety and efficacy of 577 nm yellow subthreshold micropulse laser (SML) on PSF after scleral bucking surgery. This double-masked randomized clinical trial was conducted from December 2020 to October 2022 at Chongqing Aier Eye Hospital. Participants with PSF last for 1 month after scleral bucking surgery with break closed and retina reattachment were recruitment. These participants were treated by 577 nm yellow SML or sham treatment. Funduscopy, optical coherence tomography (OCT) volume change, best corrected vision acuity (BCVA) and visual field test were evaluated for six mouths follow-up. A total of 24 participants were randomized into SML group or Sham group equally. Compared with Sham group, the OCT volume within 6 mm of macular fovea was significantly less in SML group 6 months after therapy (P = 0.048). There were no statistically significant differences of OCT volume at 1, 2 and 3 months from baseline between groups. BCVA of ETDRS letters had no statistically significant difference. Pattern Standard Deviation amelioration (P = 0.039) had statistically significance in SML group compared with Sham group. There were no complications in the 2 groups. These preliminary findings suggest that 577 nm yellow SML therapy could accelerate PSF absorption after scleral bucking surgery.Trial registration: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry No. ChiCTR2000037838, 02/09/2020, https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=51885.

Comparison of two laser power levels in the subthreshold micropulse yellow laser treatment of acute central serous chorioretinopathy

AimsTo compare the efficacy of two power levels in the 577 nm sub-threshold micro pulse laser (SML) treatment of acute central serous chorioretinopathy (aCSC). MethodsA retrospective comparative study was conducted. A total of 65 patients (65 eyes) with aCSC were enrolled. Of which, 32 patients received low power treatment and 33 patients received high power treatment of 577 nm SML. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central macular thickness (CMT), fundus-monitored microperimetry and height of subfoveal choroidal thickness (SFCT) as well as subretinal fluid (SRF) were evaluated at baseline and 3 months. ResultsThe height of SFCT and retinal sensitivity in the low power treatment group was significantly better than that in the high power treatment group at 4 weeks (all p < 0.001). Mean BCVA improved from baseline to 3 months after treatments but with no significant difference between the two groups after 3 months (p > 0.05). In the low power group, the CMT decreased from 379.76 ± 139.23 μm at baseline to 176.56 ± 37.78 μm at 3 months, and in the high power group, the CMT decreased from 364.97 ± 143.08 at baseline to 191.77 ± 38.26 μm at 3 months. There was no significant difference at 3 months between the two groups (p > 0.05). Similar results were also found in term of SRF. ConclusionsTimely intervention with 577 nm SML with low power treatment can improve visual acuity, and included anatomic success without adverse events.

Comparison of two protocols of subthreshold micropulse yellow laser treatment for non-resolving central serous chorioretinopathy.

To study the effect of subthreshold micropulse yellow laser treatment on central serous chorioretinopathy (CSC) and to compare two laser protocols. As per our knowledge, there are no studies comparing the two protocols of subthreshold laser. Twenty-three patients with non-resolving CSC of at least three months duration were treated with subthreshold laser (577 nm). Ten patients were treated with 5% duty cycle (group A) and 13 patients with 10% duty cycle (group B). At one month, best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central macular thickness (CMT), subretinal fluid (SRF), choroidal thickness (CT) and choroidal vascularity index (CVI) were evaluated. In group A, BCVA improved from 0.508 ± 504 to 0.174 ± 0.171 (P = 0.0058), CMT improved from 349.8 ± 168.9 micrometers (μm) to 183.3 ± 70.312 μm (P = 0.0093) and SRF reduced from 202.4 ± 158.024 to 43.8 ± 46.599 μm (P = 0.0069). In group B, BCVA improved from 0.437 ± 0.426 to 0.289 ± 0.470 (P = 0.0026), CMT improved from 280.846 ± 72.668 to 196.769 ± 72.62 μm (P = 0.0002) and SRF reduced from 110.385 ± 57.687 μm to 52.538 ± 52.111 μm (P = 0.0064). No significant difference was found in BCVA and CMT between the groups (P = 0.8716 and P = 0.8523, respectively). CSC completely resolved in 50% of cases in group A and in 69.2% of cases in group B. This difference was not statistically significant (0.423); however, the odds ratio of resolution was 2.25 times more with 10% duty cycle. No change was observed on fundus autofluorescence (FAF) following laser. Subthreshold micropulse laser can lead to resolution of SRF in 60.87% of cases (groups A and B combined). Ten per cent duty cycle had higher odds of resolution without causing any RPE damage.

Subthreshold Micropulse Laser for Long-Lasting Submacular Fluid after Rhegmatogeous Retinal Detachment Surgery.

PurposeTo assess the safety and efficacy of subthreshold micropulse laser (SML) photo-stimulation in the management of persistent subfoveal fluid (PSF) after surgery for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD).MethodsIn this pilot study, 11 eyes of 11 patients (8 men, 3 women) with long-lasting (12–18 months) PSF after surgery for RRD were evaluated before and after photostimulation with subthreshold micropulse yellow laser. Ophthalmic examination included best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), Amsler grid test, ophthalmoscopy, autofluorescence (AF), and optical coherence tomography (OCT) with measurement of central point foveal thickness (CPFT). Primary outcome was subfoveal fluid resolution and secondary outcome was BCVA improvement.ResultsThe mean CPFT and BCVA were, respectively, 436.8 28.8 μm and 0.25 0.1 µm decimal equivalent (DE) before photostimulation and 278 54.4 μm and 0.57 0.2 µm DE after photostimulation, a statistically significant difference (P 0.001). Nine (81.8%) eyes showed improved BCVA, disappearance of macular detachment on ophthalmoscopy, reduced retinal pigment epithelium distress on AF, and restored macular profile with no neuroretinal alterations on OCT scans.ConclusionAlthough PSF after RRD surgery is often a self-limiting disease, our results suggest that SML photostimulation may be effective and safe in patients with clinically significant long-lasting PSF. Larger case–control studies are necessary to confirm these results.

Efficacy and Safety of Subthreshold Micropulse Yellow Laser for Persistent Diabetic Macular Edema After Vitrectomy: A Pilot Study

Aim: To examine the effect of subthreshold micropulse yellow laser (SMYL) on best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central macular thickness (CMT), and optical coherence tomography angiography (OCT-A) changes in eyes with persistent diabetic macular edema (DME) after pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) for tractional DME (TDME). Patients and Methods: In a comparative study, 95 eyes of 95 consecutive patients with persistent DME were prospectively enrolled. The SMYL group (54 eyes) was treated with SMYL 6 months after PPV, while the control group (41 eyes) was followed up without treatment. BCVA and CMT by OCT were analyzed at baseline and 3 and 6 months. Additionally, parameters such as the vessel density (VD) in the superficial capillary plexus (SCP) and deep capillary plexus (DCP), respectively, and the area of the foveal avascular zone (FAZ) were also evaluated on OCT-A. Results: There were no significant differences between both groups in demographic data. In the SMYL group, mean BCVA was significantly increased [F(2,106) = 17.25; p < 0.001; = 0.246] from 51.54 ± 13.81 ETDRS letters at baseline to 57.81 ± 12.82 ETDRS letters at 3 months (p < 0.001) and 57.83 ± 13.95 EDTRS letters at 6 months (p < 0.001), respectively. In comparison to the control group, BCVA values were statistically significantly higher in the SMYL group at 3 and 6 months, respectively. Mean CMT significantly decreased [F(2,106) = 30.98; p < 0.001; = 0.368] from the baseline value 410.59 ± 129.91 μm to 323.50 ± 89.66 μm at 3 months (p < 0.001) and to 283.39 ± 73.45 μm at 6 months (p < 0.001). CMT values were significantly lower in the SMYL group (p < 0.001), especially at 6 months follow-up time (p < 0.001) compared with the control group. Parafoveal VD in the SCP and DCP was significantly higher in the SMYL group in comparison to the control group, respectively, at 3-month (SCP p < 0.001; DCP p < 0.001) and 6-month follow-up (SCP p < 0.001; DCP p < 0.001). FAZ area was also significantly smaller in the SMYL group at 6-month follow-up (p = 0.001). There were no adverse SMYL treatment effects. Conclusion: SMYL therapy may be a safe and effective treatment option in eyes with persistent macular edema following PPV for TDME.

Subthreshold micropulse yellow (577nm) laser versus intravitreal Ranibizumab in treatment of center involving diabetic macular oedema

Abstract Purpose To evaluate the effectiveness of subthreshold micropulse laser as compared to intravitreal injection of ranibizumab in treatment of center involving diabetic macular oedema. Methods A total of 76 eyes of 62 patients with center involving diabetic macular oedema were divided into two groups. Group A received intravitreal injection of ranibizumab while group B received subthreshold micropulse laser with rescue intravitreal injection of ranibizumab. The change from baseline in best correscted visual acuity and central subfield thickness were compared at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months follow-up. Any adverse effects were recorded. Results Group A (n = 34 eyes) experienced a statistically significant improvement in best corrected visual acuity (from 0.32±0.16 Log MAR at baseline to 0.21±0.14 Log MAR at 12 months) (P value =0.006), with a statistically significant reduction in central subfield ghickness (from 352.06±34.34µm to 289.47±58.88 µm) (P value=0.001). Group B (n = 42 eyes), also experienced a statistically significant improvement in best corrected visual acuity (from 0.34±0.22 Log MAR at baseline to 0.13±0.31 Log MAR at 12 months) (P value=0.001), with a statistically significant reduction in central subfield thickness (from 300±47.34µm to 253.12±39.60 µm at 12 months) (P value= 0.009). The mean difference in best corrected visual acuity between the group B and group A was -0.08 Log MAR with a 95% CI ranging from -0.197 to 0.037, which supports the claim of non-inferiority between the two treatment regimens. No adverse effects from subthreshold micropulse laser were recorded in both groups. Conclusion subthreshold micropulse laser with rescue intravitreal injection of ranibizumab was non inferior to intravitreal injection of ranibizumab in treatment of center involving diabetic macular oedema as regards the mean change in best corrected visual acuity.

Five Years Results of Subtreshold Yellow Micropulse Laser Treatment in Chronic Central Serous Chorioretinopathy: Could there be any markers of response to treatment?

Five Years Results of Subtreshold Yellow Micropulse Laser Treatment in Chronic Central Serous Chorioretinopathy: Could there be any markers of response to treatment?

Efficacy of the subthreshold micropulse yellow wavelength laser photostimulation in the treatment of chronic central serous chorioretinopathy

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of subthreshold micropulse yellow laser (SMYL) in the treatment of chronic central serous chorioretinopathy (CCSC). The medical records of 58 eyes of 58 patients with CCSC were reviewed. A 577-nm SMYL system was used for the treatment. Fundus fluorescein angiography was used as the primary method of identifying CCSC, and resolution of subretinal fluid (SRF) evaluated by optical coherence tomography (OCT) and fundus autofluorescence. Central macular thickness (CMT), central macular volume (CMV), total macular volume (TMV), subfoveal choroidal thickness (SFCT), subretinal fluid height (SRFH), and subfoveal fluid basement diameter values were measured by spectral domain-OCT (SD-OCT) for all eyes. The mean age of the patients was 42.4±9.9 (range: 20-72)y. The mean follow-up was 11.4±8.5 (range: 6-37)mo. Median BCVA at at the final follow up after treatment was statistically significant from the baseline. Complete SRF resolution was 12.1% of the eyes in the 1st month, 67.2% of the eyes in the 3rd month and 67.2% of the eyes in the last follow up. The initial median CMT, CMV, TMV, and SFCT values before treatment was significantly higher than 3rd month visit values (P<0.001). In the multivariate analysis performed, age and disease duration were found to be a risk factor for persistent SRF (P=0.017, P=0.016, respectively). SMYL treatment provides a significant anatomical and functional improvement and is effective in eliminating SRF in eyes with CCSC.

The efficacy of subthreshold micropulse yellow laser (577 nm) in chronic central serous chorioretinopathy.

Central serous chorioretinopathy (CSC) is a disease characterized by a well-defined serous detachment of the neurosensory retina. Therapeutic options in chronic cases are limited, and side effects can result in a limited response. The aim of this article is to assess the efficacy of subthreshold micropulse laser therapy in patients with chronic central serous chorioretinopathy. The study included 20 eyes of 19 patients who had a history of chronic or chronic recurrent CSC and who underwent subthreshold micropulse laser therapy between January 2015 and June 2018. Twenty eyes of 19 patients with a mean age of 48.9 ± 9.40 years were included. The mean visual acuity was 0.24 ± 0.28 logMAR before laser, 0.19 ± 0.25 logMAR 3 months after laser, and 0.18 ± 0.27 logMAR after 6 months. A statistically significant difference was determined in terms of visual acuity before and after treatment (p = 0.0001). The mean central retinal thickness was 308.10 ± 95.25 μm before laser, 233.65 ± 81.17 μm 3 months after laser, and 203.88 ± 72.79 μm at 6 months. A statistically significant relationship was present between visual acuity and the duration of disease (p = 0.001), between visual acuity and the outer nuclear layer thickness (p = 0.005), and between the outer nuclear layer thickness and the duration of disease in chronic cases (p = 0.008). There was no evidence of retinal pigment epithelium or retinal damage on optical coherence tomography or fundus autofluorescence secondary to subthreshold micropulse laser therapy. Visual acuity appears to be more associated with the duration of disease and with changes in the outer nuclear layer thickness in chronic CSC. Subthreshold micropulse laser therapy seems to be effective at treating chronic CSC, while it increases success during early period of the disease before the development of permanent retinal damage.

Subthreshold Micro-Pulse Yellow Laser and Eplerenone Drug Therapy in Chronic Central Serous Chorio-Retinopathy Patients: A Comparative Study

ABSTRACT Purpose To study the outcomes of subthreshold micropulse yellow laser (SML) and eplerenone (EP) therapy in central serous chorio-retinopathy (cCSCR) Methods Retrospective study of 28 eyes of 27 patients undergoing SML and 20 eyes of 19 patients undergoing EP therapy Results Median duration of follow-up was 8 months for SML and 4.5 months for EP group. Complete SRF resolution was seen in 12/28 (42.8%) eyes in SML and 4/20 (20%) in EP group. Six eyes in SML group and two eyes in EP group needed additional SML. No EP patients demonstrated hyperkalemia warranting stopping of therapy. Baseline visual acuity (VA) was correlated positively with final VA in both groups. Presence/absence of focal leaks had differing outcomes in both treatment groups in terms of anatomical resolution. Conclusion Both treatment modalities were effective in the management of cCSCR showing comparable favorable anatomical outcomes, but visual outcomes were not significant, probably due to chronicity of the pathology.

Subthreshold yellow micropulse laser for treatment of diabetic macular edema: Comparison between fixed and variable treatment regimen.

To compare the efficacy between fixed and variable treatment regimens of subthreshold yellow micropulse laser for the treatment of diabetic macular edema. This is a retrospective, comparative, 12-month study of 39 eyes: 24 eyes received fixed treatment regimen of subthreshold micropulse laser treatment and 15 eyes underwent variable treatment regimen of subthreshold micropulse laser, all eyes were followed up for 12 months. Subthreshold micropulse laser was performed with the following parameters: 100 μm spot size on slit lamp, 5% duty cycle of 0.2 s, and 250 mW power. To choose the power of the variable treatment regimen of subthreshold micropulse laser group, continuous laser power was titrated to a barely visible burn and then switched to MicroPulse mode, multiplying the test burn power by 4 and using a 5% duty cycle of 0.2 s. Main outcomes included changes in central macular thickness and best-corrected visual acuity. At baseline, the mean LogMAR best-corrected visual acuity was 0.297 ± 0.431 in the variable treatment regimen of subthreshold micropulse laser group and 0.228 ± 0.341 in the fixed treatment regimen of subthreshold micropulse laser group. At the end of follow-up, the mean LogMAR best-corrected visual acuity was 0.289 ± 0.473 (p = 0.785) and 0.245 ± 0.376 (p = 0.480) in the variable and fixed treatment regimens of subthreshold micropulse laser groups, respectively. Similarly, central macular thickness decreased in both groups after treatment; at baseline, the mean central macular thickness was 371.06 ± 37.8 in the variable treatment regimen of subthreshold micropulse laser group and improved to 325.60 ± 110.0 μm (p = 0.025) at the end of the follow-ups, while it was 342.30 ± 35.4 in the fixed treatment regimen of subthreshold micropulse laser group and improved to 308.51 ± 67.5 (p = 0.037). Both treatment regimens are effective for the treatment of mild center-involving diabetic macular edema: fixed treatment appears more suitable minimizing treatment time and reducing the possible errors due to wrong titration in the switch from continuous to micropulse mode.

The Role of Subthreshold Micropulse Yellow Laser as an Alternative Option for the Treatment of Refractory Postoperative Cystoid Macular Edema.

Background: To evaluate the efficacy and the safety of subthreshold micropulse yellow laser (SMYL) in the treatment of chronic postoperative cystoid macular edema (PCME), which is refractory to standard therapies. Methods: A retrospective chart review of ten eyes of ten patients affected by refractory PCME who underwent SMYL was performed. Five PCME cases were subsequent to uncomplicated cataract surgery (CS), two cases to complicated CS (CCS) with posterior capsule rupture and three cases occurred after retinal detachment surgery (RD). All conditions were refractory to conventional treatments prior to SMYL interventions for at least 4 months, including nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory eyedrops, topical steroids, oral indomethacin, sub-Tenon’s triamcinolone injections and Dexamethasone intravitreal implants. All patients underwent one or more treatments with 577 nm SMYL photo-stimulation, with 7 × 7 grids with confluent spots and a 5% duty cycle covering the whole edematous retina, including the foveal center. Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central macular thickness (CMT) were obtained using OCT, and evaluated before and after the treatment at 1, 2, 3 and 6-month follow-ups. Results: A complete subfoveal macular edema resolution was observed in all of the eyes, with statistically significant improvements in terms of BCVA and CMT in all of the follow-up timelines (at 6 months, p = 0.002 and p = 0.005, respectively). The mean number of laser treatments was 1.3. At the final follow-up, a complete subfoveal edema reabsorption was observed in all patients with visual acuity improvement. No complications were observed in any case. Conclusions: SMYL seems to be a safe and effective treatment for the long-term resolution of refractory PCME and may be a useful alternative to expensive and invasive therapeutic options.

OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY ANGIOGRAPHY CHANGES AFTER SUBTHRESHOLD MICROPULSE YELLOW LASER IN DIABETIC MACULAR EDEMA.

To assess changes on optical coherence tomography (OCT) angiography in diabetic macular edema (DME) treated with subthreshold micropulse yellow laser (SMPL) over a period of 6 months. Thirty-five eyes (35 consecutive patients) with treatment-naive DME prospectively underwent (at baseline, 3 and 6 months) best-corrected visual acuity, swept-source OCT angiography/OCT, and fundus autofluorescence. Following parameters were evaluated on OCT angiography in the superficial capillary plexus (SCP) and deep capillary plexus (DCP): the area of foveal avascular zone, number of microaneurysms (MA), area of cysts, and presence of capillary network alterations. Microaneurysm change was also evaluated in 15 fellow eyes, not needing treatment over 6 months. Vessel and perfusion densities were evaluated in the SCP, DCP, and choriocapillaris, with image J. Retina thickness, number of hyperreflective retinal spots, and external limiting membrane integrity were evaluated on OCT. All measurements were performed by two masked graders, independently. All patients had diabetes mellitus Type 2 (mean age, 69.4 ± 10.9 years; duration of diabetes mellitus, 15.7 ± 8.7 years; and HbA1c 7.7 ± 1.2%). Mean best-corrected visual acuity at baseline was 69.7 ± 12.0 letters ETDRS, 72.7 ± 10.7 at 3 months (gain 3.1 ± 4.3, P = 0.0049) and 74.3 ± 9.5 at 6 months (gain 4.6 ± 7.2, P < 0.0001). Foveal avascular zone area decreased in the DCP at 6 months (P = 0.01). Area of cysts decreased in the SCP at 3 months and 6 months (P = 0.038; P = 0.049), and in the DCP at 6 months (P = 0.0071). Number of MA decreased at 6 months in the SCP (P = 0.0007) and at 3 months and 6 months in the DCP (P = 0.048; P < 0.0001) in treated eyes. No significant change in number of MA was found in nontreated eyes. There was no statistically significant change in any other OCT angiography/OCT parameter. Subthreshold micropulse yellow laser induces more pronounced changes in the DCP than in the SCP in DME. These changes occurred as early as 3 months after treatment. The evaluation of specific parameters in the DCP may help in determining treatment response.

Commentary: Subthreshold micropulse yellow laser in diabetic macular edema.

Commentary: Subthreshold micropulse yellow laser in diabetic macular edema.

Short-duration multiple-session subthreshold micropulse yellow laser (577 nm) for chronic central serous chorioretinopathy: results at 3 years.

To review the 3-year follow-up results of subthreshold micropulse yellow laser (SMYL) delivered by a short-duration multiple-session method for treatment of chronic central serous chorioretinopathy (CSC). A total of 27 eyes from 27 patients with chronic CSC available for 3 years of follow-up were enrolled in this retrospective and interventional study. Patients were treated with 577-nm SMYL photocoagulation at a 15% duty cycle over multiple sessions, with low power ranging from 200 to 400 mW that was increased in 100 mW increments according to resolution of subretinal fluid at monthly follow-up. Laser titration was not performed. A treatment duration of 20 ms rather than the conventional duration (100-300 ms) was applied over the area of retinal pigment epithelium leakage and all areas of serous retinal detachment, including the fovea. The mean follow-up period was 3.7 ± 0.8 years (range, 3-6 years). A total of 22 out of 27 eyes (81.5%) including six cases of recurrence during the follow-up period exhibited complete resolution of subretinal detachment at final follow-up, whereas only five eyes (15.5%) had either a partial or null response to SMYL treatment. The baseline best-corrected visual acuity was 0.26 ± 0.24 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR), which was improved to 0.08 ± 0.15 logMAR at 1-year (p = 0.005) and 3-year (p = 0.01) follow-up. The central macular thickness at baseline was 389.6 ± 103.4 μm, which was changed to 197.2 ± 40.0 μm (p < 0.001) at 1-year follow-up, 196.4 ± 40.2 μm (p < 0.001) at 3-year follow-up. Short-duration multiple-session SMYL therapy may be effective for long-term treatment of chronic CSC.

Subthreshold micropulse yellow laser in the treatment of central serous chorioretinopathy

Purpose: The objective was to study the safety and efficacy of subthreshold micropulse yellow laser in the treatment of central serous chorioretinopathy (CSCR). Materials and Methods: This is a retrospective interventional case series in a tertiary eye care center. Patients diagnosed to have CSCR were treated with subthreshold micropulse yellow laser, over the leaks identified by fundus fluorescein angiography. Subretinal fluid (SRF) level was measured by optical coherence tomography at baseline and the follow-up visits at 1, 3, and 6 months. Results: Twelve eyes of 12 patients were included, and there was a statistically significant improvement in visual acuity as well as reduction in SRF level between baseline and the follow-up visits. Conclusion: There was a beneficial effect of subthreshold micropulse yellow laser in the treatment of CSCR in this study, with complete resolution of SRF in ten out of 12 eyes (83.3%). However, a larger study is warranted.

Single Retinal Layer Changes After Subthreshold Micropulse Yellow Laser in Diabetic Macular Edema.

A pilot prospective, interventional study has been conducted on 10 patients with diabetic macular edema (DME) treated with subthreshold micropulse laser (SMPL) to evaluate changes of individual retinal layers and to correlate with functional changes. All patients underwent complete ophthalmologic evaluation including spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (OCT) and microperimetry at baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, and 12 months. Compared with baseline, a significant decrease was found in inner nuclear layer (INL) and outer retinal layer (ORL) thickness in the central 1 mm (P < .05). Increase in best-corrected visual acuity was significantly and inversely correlated to central retinal thickness (CRT) (P = .0027), INL (P = .0167), and outer nuclear layer (ONL) thickness (P = .0107). Increase in retinal sensitivity was significantly and inversely correlated to CRT and ONL thickness (P < .01). Therefore, SMPL showed to improve firstly functional parameters and then morphologic parameters. Functional parameters were inversely correlated to CRT, INL, and ONL thickness. The exact mechanism of reduction of INL thickness induced by SMPL remains to be further evaluated. [Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina. 2018;49:e218-e225.].

The impact of central foveal thickness on the efficacy of subthreshold micropulse yellow laser photocoagulation in diabetic macular edema.

To evaluate the efficacy of short-term subthreshold micropulse yellow laser photocoagulation (SMYLP) on eyes with diabetic macular edema (DME) with different central foveal thicknesses (CFT). Eighty eyes of 40 patients who had previously undergone ranibizumab treatment for DME and who subsequently had recurrent macular edema were included to the study. The study subjects were divided into four groups according to their initial CFT values (group 1, 250-300μm; group 2, 301-400μm; group 3, > 401μm; group 4, 250-300μm untreated control subjects). Patients were treated with SMYLP for one session and followed for 6months. All patients underwent complete ophthalmologic evaluation. The alteration from baseline in CFT and the best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) were measured. Patients with a pretreatment CFT ≤ 300μm experienced the statistically significant reduction in CFT and gain in BCVA at 2months (p < 0.05), whereas patients with baseline CFT > 300μm experienced no significant change (p > 0.05). Hyperautofluorescence lesions, that were not previously described, were detected in fundus autofluorescence imaging in the early period after SYMLP laser and these lesions were regressed with time. Our study indicates that the SYMLP provides a statistically significant improvement in BCVA and a reduction in CFT in the patients with a pretreatment CFT of 300μm or less in DME and can be safe and effective in mild DME treatment.

Short-term Efficacy of Micropulse Yellow Laser in Non-center-involving Diabetic Macular Edema: Preliminary Results.

Objectives:The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of micropulse yellow laser (MPL) on best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and retinal thickness in patients with non-center-involving diabetic macular edema (DME).Materials and Methods:We retrospectively reviewed 9 eyes of 8 patients with non-center-involving DME who underwent MPL treatment between January 2015 and December 2016. BCVA (logMAR) and retinal thickness were evaluated before and 3 months after treatment. Maximum retinal thickness was determined manually from simultaneous spectral-domain optical coherence tomography images and recorded. The change in the measurements from before to after treatment was analyzed statistically.Results:Of the 8 patients, 3 were female and 5 were male. The mean age was 52.8 years. Two of the 9 eyes had received previous intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor injection(s). Median BCVA was improved 3 months after treatment, although the difference was not statistically significant (0.34 logMAR before and 0.29 logMAR after treatment). BCVA was improved in 4 eyes while it showed no change in the remaining 5 eyes. The mean retinal thickness was 470.6 μm at baseline and 416 μm at 3 months after MPL treatment (p=0.01). Retinal thickness decreased in all eyes after treatment.Conclusion:In this study, parafoveal retinal thickness showed significant decrease after MPL treatment in patients with DME. The limited increase in BCVA may be due to the inclusion of a low number of patients and only those with non-center-involving macular edema. MPL may be used as an alternative to conventional argon laser in non-center-involving DME.