Objective: To investigate the methods and quality assurance of metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) to detect the microbial cfDNA (mcfDNA) from blood samples in different laboratories across China. Methods: In October 2020, questionnaires about detecting mcfDNA in blood samples with mNGS were distributed to 80 laboratories across the country. The questionnaire included four parts: pre-analysis, during analysis, post-analysis, and carrying out of performance validation for mNGS. (1) Pre-analysis: the requirements for samples quality, such as collection, storage, the transportation conditions of samples; (2) During analysis: the extraction workflows of mcfDNA, the quality requirements of the library, the application of the sequencing platforms and the bioinformatics analysis pipelines; (3) Post-analysis: the standard of interpretation results for mNGS; (4) Carrying out of performance validation: the minimum detection limit for various pathogens. All laboratories are required to fill in the questionnaire according to the actual situation. The feedback data were summarized and analyzed. Results: The 80 laboratories included 20 medical centers and 60 independent medical laboratories. There were 80.0% (64/80) of laboratories indicated that both plasma and serum samples were used to detect mcfDNA in blood, and the rest of the laboratories (16/80, 20.0%) only used plasma samples. The sequencing platforms used by mNGS laboratories involved in the survey included illumina (49), Beijing Genomics Institute (16), Ion Torrent (13) and Nanopore sequencing (2). There were 87.5% (70/80) of laboratories used the integrated analysis tools built by the third-party laboratories, and other laboratories (12.5%, 10/80) independently built the analysis platform by open-source software. The interpretation criteria of mNGS results varied between laboratories, among which the normalized number of pathogen-specific sequences, relative abundance, genome coverage rate, and the detection of the microorganism in the negative control were the main factors considered by laboratories. Most laboratories (76.3%, 61/80) had carried out the performance validation for the mcfDNA mNGS workflows. The limit of detection of the laboratories-developed mNGS workflows for Gram-positive bacteria, Gram-negative bacteria, fungi, parasites, and other pathogens were mainly distributed at 10-100 copies/ml, DNA virus was mainly distributed at 500-1 000 copies/ml. Conclusions: The mNGS workflows of various laboratories are very different. In order to ensure timely and accurate testing results, every laboratory needs to actively optimize the mNGS testing procedures, improve quality assurance measures, and carry out performance validation before mNGS is widely used in clinical settings.
Read full abstract