Microdissection Testicular Sperm Extraction Research Articles

Association between anti-Müllerian hormone concentrations and sperm retrieval outcomes in patients with idiopathic nonobstructive azoospermia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Microdissection testicular sperm extraction (mTESE) is commonly performed to retrieve sperm in the testes for assisted reproductive techniques in patients with idiopathic nonobstructive azoospermia (iNOA). However, the success rate of sperm retrieval varies among individuals. We aim to investigate the association between clinical parameters and sperm retrieval outcomes in patients with iNOA. We searched PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science from database inception to August 2, 2023. The main measure was whether sperm retrieval was successful in patients with iNOA who underwent mTESE. Pooled estimates of the sperm retrieval rate and weighted mean differences were calculated using random-effects models. The overall sperm retrieval rate was 36.8% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 27.5%-46.0%, I2 = 95.0%) in nine studies comprising 1892 patients with iNOA. No significant differences were found in age, testicular volume, serum total testosterone concentrations, or inhibin B concentrations between positive and negative sperm retrieval outcomes. Lower anti-Müllerian hormone concentrations in patients with iNOA were associated with a positive outcome of mTESE (weighted mean differences: -2.70; 95% CI: -3.94--1.46, I2 = 79.0%). In conclusion, this study shows a significant relationship between anti-Müllerian hormone and sperm retrieval outcomes in patients with iNOA, while age, testicular volume, total testosterone, and inhibin B show no significant association. These findings have important implications for assessing the potential success of sperm retrieval and selecting appropriate treatment strategies in patients with iNOA.

Feasibility of high-frequency ultrasound for seminiferous tubule assessment and correlation of B-mode imaging with pathological findings in the testis in azoospermia.

To determine the feasibility of high-frequency ultrasound (HFUS) for assessing seminiferous tubules and to understand high-resolution B-mode images of the testes in cases of azoospermia. We verified how the histopathological images of testicular biopsy specimens can be observed using HFUS images and measurement analysis of seminiferous tubules was performed to 28 testes of 14 cases with azoospermia who underwent preoperative ultrasound and microdissection testicular sperm extraction (micro-TESE). The population consisted of obstructive azoospermia (OA) and non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA), including Sertoli cell-only syndrome (SCOS), and the other pathologies. Statistical verification of differences in seminiferous tubule diameters among preoperative ultrasound examination, ultrasound examination of pathological specimens, and histopathological specimens. We also examined the imagingpathology correlation via a case series presentation, aiming to identify imaging markers of testicular pathology and determine the possibility of predicting each condition. A comparison between HFUS images and histopathology from the same biopsy specimens suggested that ultrasonography could be seen as stereoscopic images due to its significantly greater slice thickness. The diameters of tubules were generally larger in pathological tissues as compared to ultrasonographic findings in OA and SCOS, but not in the other conditions. Comparisons provided insights into the predictability of SCOS and revealed imaging findings such as gaps between tubules and decreased diameter reflective of testicular damage. Seminiferous tubules can be observed however the diameter of seminiferous tubules varies in imaging and histopathology depending on the pathology. Imaging findings that reflect testicular damage and the predictability of SCOS were revealed in this study, but further verification is required.

Non-invasive biomarkers for sperm retrieval in non-obstructive patients: a comprehensive review.

Recent advancements in reproductive medicine have guided novel strategies for addressing male infertility, particularly in cases of non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA). Two prominent invasive interventions, namely testicular sperm extraction (TESE) and microdissection TESE (micro-TESE), have emerged as key techniques to retrieve gametes for assisted reproduction technologies (ART). Both heterogeneity and complexity of NOA pose a multifaceted challenge to clinicians, as the invasiveness of these procedures and their unpredictable success underscore the need for more precise guidance. Seminal plasma can be aptly regarded as a liquid biopsy of the male reproductive tract, encompassing secretions from the testes, epididymides, seminal vesicles, bulbourethral glands, and prostate. This fluid harbors a variety of cell-free nucleic acids, microvesicles, proteins, and metabolites intricately linked to gonadal activity. However, despite numerous investigations exploring potential biomarkers from seminal fluid, their widespread inclusion into the clinical practice remains limited. This could be partially due to the complex interplay of diverse clinical and genetic factors inherent to NOA that likely contributes to the absence of definitive biomarkers for residual spermatogenesis. It is conceivable that the integration of clinical data with biomarkers could increase the potential in predicting surgical procedure outcomes and their choice in NOA cases. This comprehensive review addresses the challenge of sperm retrieval in NOA through non-invasive biomarkers. Moreover, we delve into promising perspectives, elucidating innovative approaches grounded in multi-omics methodologies, including genomics, transcriptomics and proteomics. These cutting-edge techniques, combined with the clinical and genetics features of patients, could improve the use of biomarkers in personalized medical approaches, patient counseling, and the decision-making continuum. Finally, Artificial intelligence (AI) holds significant potential in the realm of combining biomarkers and clinical data, also in the context of identifying non-invasive biomarkers for sperm retrieval.

Challenges in differential diagnosis between obstructive and non‐obstructive azoospermia

AbstractBackgroundSome cases of non‐obstructive azoospermia (NOA) are characterized by normal clinical parameters, including testicular volume and levels of reproductive hormones, mimicking obstructive azoospermia (OA).MethodsWe performed a retrospective review of a consecutive series of 1417 patients undergoing primary surgical sperm retrieval between 2014 and 2023. Follicle‐stimulating hormone (FSH) level below 7.6 IU/l and normal testicular size with a long axis measurement >4.6 cm were used as criteria to suspect OA.ResultsFour hundred and eighteen patients with normal testicular volume and FSH levels had an initial diagnosis of OA. Among them, 243 (58.1%) had histological signs of spermatogenic dysfunction, and 175 (41.9%) had true OA. One hundred eleven patients had long‐standing obstruction (median: 16.5 years) with a median Bergmann–Kliesch score (BKS) of 5 (interquartile range [IQR]: 4–6) and 100% sperm retrieval rate (SRR), though some required microdissection testicular sperm extraction (microTESE). Fifty‐eight patients with a history of epididymo‐orchitis had a median BKS of 4 (IQR: 2–6) and 100% SRR. Twenty patients with a history of unjustified medical treatment for male infertility had a median BKS of 3 (IQR: 1–4) and 80% SRR. Fifty‐four patients had uniform maturation arrest with a 5.5% SRR on microTESE.ConclusionMen with normal testicular volume and FSH level may have evidence of spermatogenic failure on pathology. Patients with complicated seminal tract obstruction commonly have hypospermatogenesis, but true NOA caused by uniform maturation arrest may also be observed. Patient counseling for suspected OA should not be overly optimistic, and couples should be warned about possibility of conversion to microTESE and risks of negative sperm retrieval.

The relationship of testicular stiffness with Johnsen score and sperm retrieval outcome in men with non-obstructive azoospermia.

The pathological Johnsen score (JS) is a quantitative histological scoring system used to assess spermatogenesis in men with nonobstructive azoospermia (NOA), while elastic modulus derived from shear wave elastography (SWE) is a diagnostic tool for evaluating spermatogenic dysfunction. In this prospective observational study, we aimed to investigate whether testicular stiffness measured by SWE could serve as a substitute for JS in predicting sperm retrieval outcomes in men with NOA. This prospective cohort study analyzed 140 testes from 115 consecutive outpatient participants with NOA who had sought treatment at the reproductive medical center of a tertiary care hospital between January 2018 and October 2021. Testicular volume, elastic modulus, JS, and sperm retrieval outcomes were calculated. Statistical differences in parameters between the positive and negative sperm retrieval groups were determined using the Mann-Whitney test. Spearman rank correlation analysis was performed to determine the correlations between JS and either testicular volumes or elastic modulus. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were drawn to evaluate the diagnostic performance of the testicular elastic modulus and testicular volume. The JS correlated positively with testicular volume and negatively with the maximum elastic modulus (Emax) and mean elastic modulus (Emean), with correlation coefficients of 0.804, -0.686, and -0.456, respectively (P<0.01). There were significant differences in JS, testicular volume, and Emax between participants with positive and negative sperm retrieval of microdissection testicular sperm extraction (micro-TESE) (P<0.01). ROC curves were plotted for JS, testicular volume, and Emax to distinguish between participants with positive and negative sperm retrieval. The areas under the ROC curves (AUCs) were 0.783 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.707-0.859; P<0.01], 0.737 (95% CI: 0.651-0.823; P<0.01), and 0.729 (95% CI: 0.643-0.814; P<0.01), respectively. When the cutoff value of JS was 4.5, its sensitivity and specificity were 60.3% and 89.6%, respectively. When the cutoff value of Emax was 3.75 kPa, its sensitivity and specificity were 79.1% and 64.4%, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity were 68.5% and 83.6%, respectively when the cutoff value of testicular volume was 8.17 mL. Emax combined with testicular volume improved this diagnostic value, with an AUC of 0.742 (95% CI: 0.657-0.828; P<0.01), and sensitivity and specificity were 83.6% and 68.5%, respectively. Our study suggests that the combination of testicular stiffness and volume measurements may serve as a viable alternative to pathological JS in predicting the likelihood of successful sperm retrieval prior to micro-TESE procedures.

Achieving an optimal pregnancy outcome through the combined utilization of micro-TESE and ICSI in cryptorchidism associated with a non-canonical splicing variant in RXFP2.

To identify the genetic cause of a cryptorchidism patient carrying a non-canonical splicing variant highlighted by SPCards platform in RXFP2 and to provide a comprehensive overview of RXFP2 variants with cryptorchidism correlation. We identified a homozygous non-canonical splicing variant by whole-exome sequencing and Sanger sequencing in a case with cryptorchidism and non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA). As the pathogenicity of this non-canonical splicing variant remained unclear, we initially utilized the SPCards platform to predict its pathogenicity. Subsequently, we employed a minigene splicing assay to further evaluate the influence of the identified splicing variant. Microdissection testicular sperm extraction (micro-TESE) combined with intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) was performed. PubMed and Human Genome Variant Database (HGMD) were queried to search for RXFP2 variants. We identified a homozygous non-canonical splicing variant (NM_130806: c.1376-12A > G) in RXFP2, and confirmed this variant caused aberrant splicing of exons 15 and 16 of the RXFP2 gene: 11 bases were added in front of exon 16, leading to an abnormal transcript initiation and a frameshift. Fortunately, the patient successfully obtained his biological offspring through micro-TESE combined with ICSI. Four cryptorchidism-associated variants in RXFP2 from 90 patients with cryptorchidism were identified through a literature search in PubMed and HGMD, with different inheritance patterns. This is the first cryptorchidism case carrying a novel causative non-canonical splicing RXFP2 variant. The combined approach of micro-TESE and ICSI contributed to an optimal pregnancy outcome. Our literature review demonstrated that RXFP2 variants caused cryptorchidism in a recessive inheritance pattern, rather than a dominant pattern.

A detection model of testis-derived circular RNAs in serum for predicting testicular sperm retrieval rate in non-obstructive azoospermia patients.

Microdissection testicular sperm extraction is an effective method to retrieve sperm from non-obstructive azoospermia patients. However, its successful rate is less than 50%. To identify the predictive value of circular RNAs in serum for sperm retrieval rate in non-obstructive azoospermia patients. 180 non-obstructive azoospermia patients were recruited in this study, including 84 individuals with successful sperm retrieval and 96 individuals with failed sperm retrieval. Our study contained two phases. First, 20 patients, selected from the 180 patients, were included in screening cohort. In this cohort, the top 20 circular RNAs from our previous testicular circRNA profiles were verified between successful and failed sperm retrieval groups using real-time polymerase chain reaction. Six circular RNAs with the most significantly different expressions were selected for further verification. Second, the 180 patients were included as discovery cohort to verify the six circular RNAs. Circular RNAs were extracted from serum in each participant. Logistic regression analysis was further performed to identify the predictive value and the area under the curve analysis was used to evaluate diagnostic efficiency, sensitivity, and specificity. Six circular RNAs including hsa_circ_0058058, hsa_circ_0008045, hsa_circ_0084789, hsa_circ_0000550, hsa_circ_0007422, and hsa_circ_0004099 showed aberrant expressions between the successful and failed sperm retrieval group. In addition, both single-circular RNA panels and multi-circular RNA panels were finally verified to be significant in predicting sperm retrieval rate. Notably, multi-circular RNAs panels demonstrated better predictive abilities compared with single-circRNA panels, and the combined panel of six-circular RNAs (risk score=1.094×hsa_circ_0058058+0.697×hsa_circ_0008045+0.718×hsa_circ_0084789-0.591×hsa_circ_0000550-0.435×hsa_circ_0007422-1.017×hsa_circ_0004099-1.561) exhibited the best predictive ability in the present study with an AUC of 0.977, a sensitivity of 91.7% and a specificity of 86.5%. A higher risk score indicated a higher risk of failure in sperm retrieval. Our study was the first to report that testis-derived circular RNAs in serum have the ability to predict sperm retrieval rate in non-obstructive azoospermia patients, whether it is a single-circular RNA or a combination of multi-circular RNAs.

A step closer to parenthood with non-obstructive azoospermia: Unveiling the impact of microdissection testicular sperm extraction in Australia's largest single-centre study.

Non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA) diagnosis poses challenges for couples seeking parenthood. Microdissection testicular sperm extraction (MD-TESE) excels in retrieving testicular sperm cells for NOA cases. However, limited live birth data in Australian NOA patients hinders accurate counselling. This study aimed to determine the likelihood of infertile couples with a male partner diagnosed with NOA conceiving biological children using MD-TESE / intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). A retrospective cohort study included 108 NOA men treated at a public fertility unit and a private fertility centre (May 2009-May 2022). live birth rate (LBR); secondary outcomes: sperm retrieval rate, pregnancy rate, and neonatal outcomes. Among 108 patients undergoing MD-TESE, the positive sperm retrieval rate (PSRR) was 64.8% (70/108). Histology best predicted sperm retrieval success, with hypo-spermatogenesis yielding a 94.1% PSRR. Age, testicular volume, and hormonal parameters had no significant impact. Mean male age: 35.4 years; mean partner age: 32.7 years. Fertilisation rate: 50.7%. LBR per initiated cycle: 58.7% (37/63); per embryo transfer: 63.8% (37/58); per initially diagnosed NOA man: 34.3% (37/108). Cumulative LBR: 74.1% (43/58); twin rate: 10.8% (4/37). No neonatal deaths or defects were observed among 47 live offspring. This study provides valuable data for counselling NOA couples on the probability of conceiving biological offspring. MD-TESE and ICSI yielded favourable PSRR (64.8%) and LBR (63.8%). However, couples should be aware that once NOA is confirmed, the chance of taking home a baby is 34%.

Ex vivo microscopic testicular sperm extraction at the time of radical orchiectomy in men with nonobstructive azoospermia (NOA): a scoping review.

Testicular tumor is the most common solid malignancy in males under 40 years of age. This malignancy is known to have a negative impact on male fertility. Therefore, several techniques for sperm retrieval have been proposed, including microdissection testicular sperm extraction (mTESE). The objective of this study was to review the literature on the outcomes of oncological (Onco)-mTESE at the time of radical orchiectomy. We conducted a comprehensive literature search through PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Central Controlled Register of Trials. Only studies reporting ex vivo mTESE in patients with testicular tumor were considered. Twelve papers met the inclusion criteria and were included in this review. Tumor size was identified as the sole preoperative factor influencing spermatogenesis. The considered studies demonstrated a satisfactory success rate for Onco-mTESE, associated with a similarly valid percentage of live healthy births through assisted reproductive technology. Currently, no comparison has been made between Onco-mTESE and conventional Onco-TESE, hence further assessment is required. In cases where the tumor completely replaces the cancer-bearing testicle, a contralateral micro-TESE may be a viable alternative. However, the surgeon should evaluate associated risks and benefits preoperatively. In conclusion, Onco-mTESE at the time of radical orchiectomy appears to be a promising therapeutic option for young patients with testicular tumors. Nevertheless, additional studies are necessary to achieve a definitive conclusion.

Differences in clinical outcomes between men with mosaic Klinefelter syndrome and those with non-mosaic Klinefelter syndrome.

This study compared the clinical outcomes of men with Klinfelter syndrome based on karyotype. The authors analyzed the outcomes of microdissection testicular sperm extraction (micro-TESE) performed on 57 patients with Klinfelter syndrome (KS) at our clinic. The average ages of the non-mosaic and mosaic KS groups were 32.2 ± 4.8 and 45.9 ± 13.1 years, respectively. The sperm retrieval rates of the non-mosaic and mosaic KS groups were 46.5% (20/43) and 50.0% (7/14), respectively. The fertilization rates after intracytoplasmic sperm injection did not significantly differ between the non-mosaic and mosaic KS groups. The mosaic KS group had higher cleavage and blastocyst development rates than the non-mosaic KS group (72.2% vs. 96.2% and 30.5% vs. 44.7%, respectively). The group using motile sperm had better outcomes than the group using immotile sperm. The embryo transfer outcomes of the non-mosaic and mosaic KS groups did not significantly differ (clinical pregnancy rate: 28.0% vs. 20.7%, miscarriage rate: 14.3% vs. 33.3%, production rate per transfer: 22.0% vs. 13.8%, and production rate per case: 58.8% vs. 57.1%). Compared with the non-mosaic KS group, the mosaic KS group had significantly better intracytoplasmic sperm injection outcomes because of the higher utilization rate of motile sperm.

Microdissection testicular sperm extraction in non-obstructive azoospermic patients with solitary testis: a retrospective case-control study.

Obtaining sperm from the testis surgically and using these sperm with the intracytoplasmic sperm injection technique, has opened the way for the possibility of biological fathering in men with non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA). We aimed to evaluate our sperm retrieval rate (SRR) by microdissection testicular sperm extraction (micro-TESE) in NOA patients with solitary testis. In this retrospective case-control study, fortyfive patients with NOA who had a congenital or acquired solitary testis were included, between September 2003 and January 2022. These patients were randomly matched with patients with NOA who had bilateral testes, using a 1:3 matching ratio. We found that SRR by micro-TESE in patients with solitary testis was similar to NOA patients with bilateral testis (51.1% vs. 50.4%). Age, infertility period, ejaculate volume, serum levels of follicle stimulating hormone (FSH), luteinizing hormone (LH) and testosterone, history of varicocelectomy, history of orchiopexy, testicular stimulation therapy before micro-TESE, testicular volume, genetic status, TESE side, micro-TESE success, complications and histopathological evaluation results of both groups were evaluated, there was a statistically significant difference in only serum FSH and LH levels. There was no difference between the groups in terms of complications and hormonal effects in the early postoperative period. Micro-TESE in NOA patients with solitary testis has similar sperm retrieval and complication rates as NOA patients with bilateral testis.

Comparison of sperm retrieval rate between superficial and deep dissection during microscopic testicular sperm extraction.

The purpose of the study was to compare the outcome of microscopic testicular sperm extraction (micro-TESE) between superficial and deep dissection on the same testicle in terms of sperm retrieval rate (SRR). In a retrospective study from June 2019 to October 2021, 44 patients with nonobstructive azoospermia who underwent micro-TESE with positive results (mature sperm identified) were included. Eight patients were excluded from the study due to deficient documentation on superficial and deep dissection. A total of 36 patients were included; 60 testicles were examined for superficial and deep biopsies. Testicular histopathology was performed in all patients, and a hormonal evaluation was obtained before the micro-TESE attempt. Thirty-six patients and 60 testicles were included in the study. Of them, 47 (78.3%) testicles had positive results. Superficial TESE was positive in 38 (63.3%) testicles, and deep TESE was successful in 45 (75.0%) testicles. An improvement of 13.9% in the SRR was observed, following deep dissection. However, there was no statistically significant difference (P = 0.166). Rates of positive sperm retrieval (from any side) did not differ significantly based on patients' age, microdissection testicular sperm extraction sides, and hormonal concentrations; these differences were not apparent after superficial or deep TESE. The presented findings suggest that although successful SRRs of deep TESE were higher than that of its superficial counterpart, there was no significant statistical difference. A larger body of evidence is needed to provide a higher grade of recommendation.

Global Practice Patterns and Variations in the Medical and Surgical Management of Non-Obstructive Azoospermia: Results of a World-Wide Survey, Guidelines and Expert Recommendations.

Non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA) is a common, but complex problem, with multiple therapeutic options and a lack of clear guidelines. Hence, there is considerable controversy and marked variation in the management of NOA. This survey evaluates contemporary global practices related to medical and surgical management for patients with NOA. A 56-question online survey covering various aspects of the evaluation and management of NOA was sent to specialists around the globe. This paper analyzes the results of the second half of the survey dealing with the management of NOA. Results have been compared to current guidelines, and expert recommendations have been provided using a Delphi process. Participants from 49 countries submitted 336 valid responses. Hormonal therapy for 3 to 6 months was suggested before surgical sperm retrieval (SSR) by 29.6% and 23.6% of participants for normogonadotropic hypogonadism and hypergonadotropic hypogonadism respectively. The SSR rate was reported as 50.0% by 26.0% to 50.0% of participants. Interestingly, 46.0% reported successful SSR in <10% of men with Klinefelter syndrome and 41.3% routinely recommended preimplantation genetic testing. Varicocele repair prior to SSR is recommended by 57.7%. Half of the respondents (57.4%) reported using ultrasound to identify the most vascularized areas in the testis for SSR. One-third proceed directly to microdissection testicular sperm extraction (mTESE) in every case of NOA while others use a staged approach. After a failed conventional TESE, 23.8% wait for 3 months, while 33.1% wait for 6 months before proceeding to mTESE. The cut-off of follicle-stimulating hormone for positive SSR was reported to be 12-19 IU/mL by 22.5% of participants and 20-40 IU/mL by 27.8%, while 31.8% reported no upper limit. This is the largest survey to date on the real-world medical and surgical management of NOA by reproductive experts. It demonstrates a diverse practice pattern and highlights the need for evidence-based international consensus guidelines.

Sperm retrieval rate and patient factors in azoospermia factor c microdeletion azoospermia: a systematic review.

To reveal the overall sperm retrieval rate (SRR) and range in patients with azoospermia factor c (AZFc) microdeletion azoospermia by microdissection testicular sperm extraction (mTESE) and discuss the differences of preoperative patient factors among studies with various SRRs. We searched PubMed, Web of Science and Embase until February 2023. All studies reporting SRRs by mTESE and required parameters of patients with AZFc microdeletions were included. The primary outcome was the SRR and, if available, the pregnancy rate (PR) and live-birth rate (LBR) after intracytoplasmic sperm injection were also investigated as secondary outcomes. Eventually 11 cohort studies were included in this review. A total number of 441 patients underwent mTESE and in 275 of them sperm was obtained, reaching an overall SRR of 62.4%. The SRRs among studies had a wide range from 25.0% to 85.7%. The studies reporting higher SRRs generally had older mean ages, and higher follicle-stimulating hormone and testosterone levels. Only four studies provided practical data on pregnancies and live-born children of patients with AZFc microdeletions, so the overall PR and LBR were unavailable. The overall SRR of patients with AZFc microdeletion azoospermia was 62.4%. The effect of patient factors in SR needs further evidence in future work.

AI Model Developed Using Machine Learning for Predicting Sperm Retrieval in Micro-TESE for Nonobstructive Azoospermia Patients

Azoospermia is a severe problem that prevents couples from having their own children through natural pregnancy. In nonobstructive azoospermia (NOA), microdissection testicular sperm extraction (micro-TESE) is required to collect sperm and, at 40%–60%, the sperm retrieval success rate is not very high. Previous studies identified no single clinical finding or investigation that could accurately predict the outcome of sperm retrieval. It would be very valuable to have a factor for predicting the possibility of sperm retrieval in patients with NOA before performing micro-TESE. We retrospectively obtained data from the medical records of 430 patients who underwent micro-TESE from 2011 to 2020. Parameters extracted were age, height, body weight, body mass index, luteal hormone, follicle-stimulating hormone, PRL, total testosterone, E2, T/E2, sperm retrieval, G-band, AZF, medical history, Rt testis, and Lt testis. Prediction One, which does not require coding, was used to create the AI prediction model for sperm retrieval. Prediction One makes the best prediction model using an artificial neural network with internal cross-validation. Prediction One also evaluates the “importance of variables” using a method based on permutation feature importance. The AUC for the AI model was 0.7246, which is acceptable. In addition, among the variables, T/E2 ratios contributed most to predicting whether sperm retrieval was possible or not. However, the difference in T/E2 between successful and unsuccessful sperm retrieval was not statistically significant. In addition, our analysis of data from 20 patients who underwent micro-TESE in 2021 found that in 85%, the actual result matched the result predicted using our novel AI model. We created an AI model for predicting sperm retrieval in patients with NOA before undergoing micro-TESE. In addition, we found that T/E2 ratios contributed most to predicting possibility of sperm retrieval in NOA using machine learning.

ICSI outcome after microdissection testicular sperm extraction, testicular sperm aspiration and ejaculated sperm

We conducted a case-controlled single-center cohort study to evaluate the intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) outcome in severe male infertility with different methods of sperm obtention. The data was compiled from a tertiary university hospital. The micro-TESE procedures were performed from 2008 to 2023, with a sperm recovery rate (SRR) of 45 %. The ICSI treatments were carried out between 2011 and 2023. The aim of the study was to compare the ICSI outcome using sperm obtained by microdissection testicular extraction (micro-TESE), testicular sperm aspiration (TESA), and ejaculated sperm with sperm concentration less than 15 million per milliliter. We included a total of 462 ICSI cycles, of which 340 ICSIs with ejaculated sperm of men with oligozoospermia, with or without asthenozoospermia or teratozoospermia (OAT group), 51 ICSIs with TESA sperm of men with obstructive azoospermia (OA, TESA group), and 71 ICSIs with micro-TESE sperm of men with non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA, micro-TESE group). The patient characteristics, fertilization rate, pregnancy rate, and pregnancy outcome data were similar between the groups. The fertilization rates were 66.0 % in the OAT group, 68.3 % in the TESA group and 62.8 % in the micro-TESE group and live birth rate per embryo transfer were 23.7 %, 28.9 %, and 25.0 %, respectively, without statistical difference. The obstetrical outcome was similar in all the groups. The overall clinical results in all ICSI cycles performed for treating severe male factor infertility were similar, independent of the method of collection of spermatozoa. The results also confirm the efficacy of micro-TESE in the treatment of severe male factor infertility.

A Prior History of Cryptozoospermia Is Associated with a Significantly Higher Chance of a Successful Microdissection Testicular Sperm Extraction Compared to Non-Obstructive Azoospermia

A Prior History of Cryptozoospermia Is Associated with a Significantly Higher Chance of a Successful Microdissection Testicular Sperm Extraction Compared to Non-Obstructive Azoospermia

Association of the minimal cyclophosphamide equivalent dose and outcome of microdissection testicular sperm extraction in patients with persistent azoospermia after chemotherapy

To investigate whether the minimal cyclophosphamide equivalent dose (mCED), a novel approach for estimating alkylating agent exposure, is associated with the sperm retrieval rates by microdissection testicular sperm extraction (mTESE) in azoospermic postchemotherapy cancer survivors. A retrospective cohort study conducted between 2002 and2017. An academic medical center. A total of 28 azoospermic postchemotherapy cancer survivors who underwent mTESE. Chemotherapy exposure and mCED calculation. The primary outcome was the association between the mCED and sperm retrieval rate using mTESE. The mCED value for each patient's regimen received was estimated using the lowest recommended dosing regimen from the range of recommended doses at the time of administration. Spermatozoa were successfully retrieved in 11 (39.3%) of the patients. Age at the time of receiving chemotherapy and mCED were significant factors associated with sperm retrieval. An mCED of <4,000 mg/m2 had a higher sperm retrieval rate (10/14, 71.4%) than an mCED of >4,000 mg/m2 (0/8, 0). The hormone levels were not significantly different when comparing patients with and without successful sperm retrieval. Seminoma, nonseminomatous germ cell tumor, and acute lymphoblastic leukemia had favorable sperm retrieval rates-100% (2/2), 66.7% (2/3), and 66.7% (2/3), respectively-although the numbers of patients in each group were small. Among this cohort of patients with cancer who required chemotherapy regimens, successful sperm retrieval by mTESE was only noted among cancer survivors receiving an mCED of <4,000 mg/m2.

Microdissection Testicular Sperm Extraction.

Nonobstructive azoospermia (NOA) is among the most common causes of male infertility. For men with NOA seeking fertility treatment, microdissection testicular sperm extraction (microTESE) is the best option for retrieving sperm, which can be used with in vitro fertilization-intracytoplasmic sperm injection to achieve pregnancy in their partner. With the aid of the operating microscope, microTESE allows for thorough evaluation of the testis tissue and selection of seminiferous tubules that appear most capable of sperm production. Rates of success with microTESE vary depending on the underlying cause of NOA and the center at which the procedure is performed. Not all patients are candidates for microTESE, and those who are candidates should be counseled on the likelihood of sperm retrieval and the potential for changes in postoperative testis function.

Age, Sperm Retrieval, and Testicular Histology in Klinefelter Syndrome.

We sought to examine sperm retrieval and testicular histology in males of different ages with Klinefelter syndrome. We identified all males with Klinefelter syndrome who underwent microdissection testicular sperm extraction at our institution from 1995 to 2020. Patients were divided into adolescent (<20 years) and adult (≥20 years) cohorts. Histology and sperm retrieval were compared using chi-square statistics. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to examine factors associated with successful sperm retrieval. We identified 217 males with Klinefelter syndrome, of whom 59 were adolescents and 158 were adults. Adults were stratified into 10-year groupings (20-29 years, n = 62; 30-39 years, n = 88; ≥40 years, n = 8). Approximately 17% of adolescents had testis histology containing germ cells compared with 15% of the 20 to 29-year cohort, 14% of the 30 to 39-year cohort, and 0% over 40 years. In comparison to adolescents (53%), the sperm retrieval rate was significantly higher in the 20 to 29-year cohort (71%, P = .04) and lower in the ≥40-year cohort (13%, P = .03). In multivariable analysis, the presence of hypospermatogenesis on testis biopsy (OR 5.8, P = .03) was associated with higher odds of successful sperm retrieval. Younger males more frequently had germ cell-containing testis histology, however this finding was not associated with a higher odds of sperm retrieval. Reproductive urologists should counsel azoospermic males with Klinefelter syndrome that sperm retrieval during adolescence for fertility preservation is not required and can be performed in young adulthood.