A. baumannii is categorized as a priority pathogen due to its propensity for multi-drug resistance, exhibiting resistance against the last resort of antibiotics. It is also considered a potent nosocomial pathogen, so targeting the microbe using novel strategies would be the need of the hour. In this context, the in-silico computational approach would serve the best to design the possible epitope peptides, which may be further considered for the experimental trials for their immunological response. Objective: To predict the immune-dominant epitope peptide candidates against the bfmRandbfmS proteins mediating the two-component system adaptation in the formation of biofilm in A. baumannii. 11 different FASTA sequences ofbfmRandbfmSfromA. baumannii strains retrieved based on the blast-p similarity search tool were subjected to linear epitope B-cell epitope predictions under the IEDB B-cell epitope prediction server. Further analysis on antigenicity, allergenicity, and toxigenicity was achieved using the AntigenPro, Vaxijen, and AlgPred tools, with the physical and chemical properties evaluated using the Expasy Protparam server. Selection of the immunodominant peptides for T-cells was done through the databases under IEDB. The final assessment of protein-TLR2 interactions was done by MHC cluster servers. Four peptide sequences (E1-E4) were predicted for B-cell dominance, with E1, E2, and E4 as probable antigens. All were soluble and non-toxigenic. E1 and E3 were considered non-allergens. GRAVY values were negative for all the peptides, indicating the protein to be hydrophilic in nature. Analysis of the T-cell epitopes was promising, with 100% conservancy for class-I HLA alleles, high interaction scores for similarity with TLR2, and more hydrogen bonds for E2, followed by other epitope peptides. The promising four epitopes, as predicted for bfmRandbfmS in the present study, suggest their potent role as possible candidates for the design of vaccines targeting the TCSofA. baumannii, recommending further in vitroand in vivoexperimental validation.