MGMT Unmethylated Tumors Research Articles

CTNI-50. CLINICAL EFFICACY AND PK/PD RESPONSE IN A PHASE 0/2 STUDY OF NIRAPARIB PLUS RADIOTHERAPY FOR NEWLY-DIAGNOSED, MGMT-UNMETHYLATED GLIOBLASTOMA

Abstract BACKGROUND Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) mediates DNA damage response; niraparib is a PARP1/2-selective inhibitor. This Phase 0/2 study evaluates tumor pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), and clinical efficacy of niraparib plus fractionated radiotherapy in newly diagnosed, O6-methylguanine methyltransferase (MGMT)-unmethylated glioblastoma (GBM). METHODS Newly-diagnosed GBM patients received 4 days of niraparib (300/200 mg QD) prior to planned resection 3-5 (cohort 1) or 8-10 hours (cohort 2) following the last dose. Tumor tissue (gadolinium-enhancing and non-enhancing regions), cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), and plasma were collected. Total and unbound drug concentrations were measured using validated LC-MS/MS methods. PARP inhibition was assessed by quantification of PAR induction after ex vivo irradiation vs non-irradiated control. A PK response was defined as unbound [niraparib] > 5-fold biochemical IC50 (19 nM) in non-enhancing tumor. Patients with MGMT-unmethylated tumors and a PK response were eligible for Phase 2 dosing of niraparib plus radiotherapy followed by niraparib monotherapy. RESULTS All Phase 0 patients (n=46) met the PK threshold. The mean unbound concentrations of niraparib in non-enhancing tumor regions were 335.1 nM (cohort 1; n=43) and 331.9 nM (cohort 2; n=3). Ex vivo PAR suppression was observed in 73% of the patients (24/33). 71.4% patients with unmethylated tumors were enrolled into Phase 2. Five patients in Phase 2 experienced Grade 4 thrombocytopenia related to niraparib and all adverse events resolved without sequelae. At a mean clinical follow-up of 13.4 months, median overall survival was 20.3 months. CONCLUSIONS Niraparib achieves pharmacologically relevant concentrations in non-enhancing, newly-diagnosed GBM tissue. Accompanying PD effects were observed in tumor tissue, no new safety signals were observed, and clinical outcomes were promising. A global Phase 3, open-label, randomized 2-arm study comparing niraparib versus temozolomide in adult patients with newly diagnosed, MGMT-unmethylated glioblastoma is underway.

Onco-functional outcome after resection for eloquent glioblastoma (OFO): A propensity-score matched analysis of an international, multicentre, cohort study

BackgroundThe combined impact of complete resection (oncological goal) and no functional loss (functional goal) in glioblastoma subgroups is currently unknown. This study aimed to develop a novel onco-functional outcome (OFO) to merge these two goals into one outcome, resulting in four classes: complete without deficits (OFO1), incomplete without deficits (OFO2), complete with deficits (OFO3), or incomplete with deficits (OFO4). MethodsBetween 2010–2020, 858 patients with tumor resection for eloquent glioblastoma were included. We analyzed the impact of OFO class on postoperative surgical outcomes using Cox proportional-hazards models with hazard ratios (HR) or logistic regression with odds ratios (OR), followed by specific subgroup analyses. We developed a risk model to predict OFO class preoperatively using logistic regression. ResultsThe OFO classification stratified the four OFO classes for overall survival (OS:19.0 versus 14.0 versus 12.0 versus 9.0 months), progression-free survival (PFS), and adjuvant therapy. OFO1 was associated with improved OS [HR= 0.67, (0.55–0.81); p < 0.001], and PFS [HR = 0.68, (0.57–0.81); p < 0.001] in the overall cohort and all clinical and molecular subgroups, except for MGMT-unmethylated tumors; and higher rate of adjuvant therapy [OR= 2.81, (1.71–4.84);p < 0.001]. In patients≥ 70 years, only OFO1 improved their survival outcomes. Safe surgery was especially important in patients with a preoperative KPS ≤ 80 to qualify for adjuvant treatment. Awake craniotomy more often led to OFO1 compared to asleep resection [OR = 1.93, (1.19–3.14); p = 0.008]. ConclusionsOFO1 was associated with improved OS, PFS, and receipt of adjuvant therapy in all glioblastoma patients with IDH-wildtype and MGMT-methylated tumors. Awake craniotomy was associated with achieving this optimal OFO status. Preventing deficits was more important than complete surgery.

Temozolomide based treatment in glioblastoma: 6 vs. 12 months.

The Stupp regimen remains the standard treatment for newly diagnosed glioblastomas, although the prognosis remains poor. Several temozolomide alternative schedules have been studied, with extended adjuvant treatment (>6 cycles of temozolomide) frequently used, although different trials have indicated contrasting results. Survival data of 87 patients who received 6 ('6C' group) or 12 ('12C' group) cycles of temozolomide were collected between 2012 and 2022. A total of 45 patients were included in the 6C group and 42 patients were included in the 12C group. Data on isocitrate dehydrogenase mutation and methylguanine-DNA-methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation status were also collected. The 12C group exhibited statistically significantly improved overall survival [OS; 22.8 vs. 17.5 months; hazard ratio (HR), 0.47; 95% CI, 0.30-0.73; P=0.001] and progression-free survival (15.3 vs. 9 months; HR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.25-0.62; P=0.001). However, in the subgroup analysis according to MGMT status, OS in the 12C group was significantly superior to OS in the 6C group only in the MGMT unmethylated tumors. The present data suggested that extended adjuvant temozolomide appeared to be more effective than the conventional six cycles.

Niraparib efficacy in patients with newly-diagnosed glioblastoma: Clinical readout of a phase 0/2 "trigger" trial.

2002 Background: Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) mediates DNA damage response; niraparib is an investigational PARP1/2-selective inhibitor. This Phase 0 study evaluates newly-diagnosed glioblastoma (GBM) tumor pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD), graduating patients with O6-methylguanine methyltransferase (MGMT) unmethylated tumors into a therapeutic regimen of niraparib plus fractionated radiotherapy when PK threshold is met. Methods: Presumed newly-diagnosed GBM patients received 4 days of niraparib (300/200 mg QD) prior to planned resection 3-5 (cohort 1) or 8-10 hours (cohort2) following the last dose. Tumor tissue (Gadolinium enhancing and non-enhancing regions), cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), and plasma were collected. Total and unbound niraparib concentrations were measured using validated LC-MS/MS methods. PARP inhibition was assessed by quantification of PAR induction after ex vivo irradiation of surgical vs non-irradiated tissue. A PK ‘trigger’ determined eligibility for the Phase 2 component of the study and was defined as unbound [niraparib] &gt; 5-fold biochemical IC50 (i.e., 19 nM) in non-enhancing tumor. Patients with MGMT unmethylated tumors in excess of the PK threshold were eligible for Phase 2 dosing of niraparib plus radiotherapy followed by a maintenance phase of niraparib monotherapy. Results: All Phase 0 patients (n=46) met the PK threshold. In non-enhancing tumor regions, the mean unbound concentration of niraparib was 335.1 nM (n=43) for cohort 1 and 331.9 nM (n=3) for cohort 2. PAR suppression after ex vivo radiation was observed in 73% of the patients (24/33). Nineteen of 27 (70.3%) patients with unmethylated tumors were enrolled into Phase 2. Five patients in Phase 2 experienced Grade 4 thrombocytopenia related to niraparib. All adverse events resolved without sequelae. At time of data cutoff, median progression-free survival was 11.7 months. Mature overall survival (OS) data will be reported for the first time. Conclusions: Niraparib achieves pharmacologically relevant concentrations in non-enhancing, newly-diagnosed GBM tissue in excess of any other studied PARP inhibitor. Accompanying PD effects were observed in patient tumor tissue. For the first time, we report on the clinical efficacy of the study. A global Phase 3, open-label, randomized 2-arm study comparing niraparib versus temozolomide in adult patients with newly diagnosed, MGMT unmethylated glioblastoma is being planned. Clinical trial information: NCT05076513 .

Abstract IA006: Multifaceted effects of DNA damage response inhibitors on radiation responses of glioblastoma and the normal brain

Abstract PARP inhibitors (PARPi) and ATM inhibitors (ATMi) enhance radiation sensitivity in multiple cancer models, both in vitro and in vivo. Our observation that the radiosensitizing properties of PARPi are most pronounced in rapidly proliferating cells is reflected in early phase clinical trial data showing exacerbation of acute radiation toxicity in rapidly proliferating tissues such as oropharyngeal and esophageal mucosa. Lack of radiosensitization in late responding, slowly proliferating normal tissues indicates that PARPi may be more effectively combined with radiation therapy (RT) in patients with brain tumors. ATMi are much more potent radiosensitizers than PARPi but less is known about their impact on normal tissue toxicity since they have only recently progressed to the clinic, although preclinical in vivo data are encouraging. We are evaluating the oral PARPi olaparib and the oral ATMi AZD1390 in combination with RT +/- temozolomide (TMZ) in the treatment of glioblastoma (GBM), the most prevalent and most aggressive primary brain tumor. Patients with GBM experience very poor outcomes in terms of both median survival (c.1 year) and neurocognitive decline, which is caused primarily by RT. Early phase testing of the olaparib-RT combination is underway in three populations of patients with newly diagnosed GBM. Patients aged &amp;gt;65 with MGMT unmethylated GBM are being recruited to a randomized, placebo-controlled phase II study (PARADIGM, ISRCTN52658296) after a phase I dose escalation study showed that olaparib (200 mg twice daily) was extremely well tolerated when combined with brain irradiation (40 Gray in 15#). Good performance status patients aged under 70 are being recruited to PARADIGM-2 (ISRCTN51253312) which comprises two parallel phase I dose escalation studies: patients with MGMT unmethylated tumors are receiving daily olaparib with RT (60 Gy in 30#) without TMZ, while patients with MGMT methylated tumors are receiving intermittent olaparib with standard chemoradiation. AZD1390 is being evaluated in a first-in-human phase I dose escalation study (NCT03423628) in combination with re-irradiation (35 Gy in 10#) in patients with recurrent GBM, and with first-line radical radiotherapy (60 Gy in 30#) in patients with newly diagnosed, MGMT unmethylated GBM. In parallel, we are undertaking preclinical studies to investigate the impact of PARPi and ATMi on RT induced neurotoxicity. In vivo imaging studies support the emerging concept that RT induced neuroinflammation is important in the pathogenesis of neurotoxicity, and we have generated preliminary behavioral data indicating that both PARPi and ATMi can alleviate the neurotoxic effects of RT. Ongoing experiments are defining the roles of microglia, astrocytes and neurogenesis in this phenomenon. We will present these diverse datasets in the context of our hypothesis that combining PARPi or ATMi with RT has potential to improve outcomes for GBM patients by enhancing tumor control while simultaneously suppressing neuroinflammation and alleviating RT related neurocognitive decline. Citation Format: Anthony J. Chalmers. Multifaceted effects of DNA damage response inhibitors on radiation responses of glioblastoma and the normal brain [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference in Cancer Research: DNA Damage Repair: From Basic Science to Future Clinical Application; 2024 Jan 9-11; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(1 Suppl):Abstract nr IA006.

Identification of MGMT promoter methylation as a specific lipid metabolism biomarker, reveals the feasibility of atorvastatin application in glioblastoma

BackgroundGlioblastoma is one of the deadliest tumors, and limited improvement in managing glioblastoma has been achieved in the past decades. The unmethylated promoter area of 6-O-Methylguanine-DNA Methyltransferase (MGMT) is a significant biomarker for recognizing a subset of glioblastoma that is resistant to chemotherapy. Here we identified MGMT methylation can also work as a specific biomarker to classify the lipid metabolism patterns between methylated and unmethylated glioblastoma and verify the potential novel therapeutic strategy for unmethylated MGMT glioblastoma. MethodsLiquid Chromatograph Mass Spectrometer has been applied for non-targeted metabolome and targeted lipidomic profiling to explore the metabolism pattern correlated with MGMT promoter methylation. Transcriptome has been performed to explore the biological differences and the potential mechanism of lipid metabolism in glioblastoma samples. In vivo and ex vivo assays were performed to verify the anti-tumor activity of atorvastatin in the administration of glioblastoma. ResultsMulti-omics assay has described a significant difference in lipid metabolism between MGMT methylated and unmethylated glioblastoma. Longer and unsaturated fatty acyls were found enriched in MGMT-UM tumors. Lipid droplets have been revealed remarkably decreased in MGMT unmethylated glioblastoma. In vivo and ex vivo assays revealed that atorvastatin and also together with temozolomide showed significant anti-tumor activity, and atorvastatin alone was able to achieve better survival and living conditions for tumor-hosting mice. ConclusionsMGMT promoter methylation status might be a well-performed biomarker of lipid metabolism in glioblastoma. The current study can be the basis of further mechanism studies and implementation of clinical trials, and the results provide preclinical evidence of atorvastatin administration in glioblastoma, especially for MGMT unmethylated tumors.

Abstract A002: The utility of pre-clinical trials in glioblastoma patient-derived xenografts (PDXs) models for informing clinical trial development of therapeutic strategies

Abstract Large PDX collections provide broad representation of tumor genetics and are commonly used to evaluate the clinical potential of novel therapeutic strategies. In many solid malignancies, profound benefit in PDX preclinical studies has foreshadowed eventual FDA approval of clinically impactful therapeutics. With a lack of corresponding progress in glioblastoma (GBM), the value of PDX testing has been questioned. Mayo Clinic has developed 111 GBM PDXs from newly diagnosed (72 PDX) and recurrent (39 PDX) patients, and over the past 23 years, we have used this collection for extensive in vivo preclinical testing of 145 drugs in both orthotopic and heterotopic settings. As part of this work, the impact of standard of care therapy with temozolomide (TMZ) and bevacizumab was evaluated in orthotopic models using clinically relevant dosing regimens. For each animal study, the ratio of median survival for treated vs. control animals were used to define a ‘survival ratio’ as a normalized metric of benefit. TMZ efficacy was evaluated in 26 newly diagnosed GBM PDXs, with equal representation of MGMT methylated and unmethylated tumors. As expected, MGMT methylated PDXs were much more sensitive to TMZ as compared to unmethylated PDXs (median survival ratio 4.47 vs 1.48, respectively), and similar to clinical experience, 2 MGMT unmethylated PDXs were markedly sensitive to TMZ, while 1 MGMT methylated PDX was relatively resistant. In a more limited study, dose-dense vs. standard TMZ dosing was compared in 7 PDXs (4 MGMT methylated, 3 MGMT unmethylated). In a pooled analysis of all lines, both standard (HR=0.09; 95% CI: 0.06–0.14) and dose-dense TMZ therapy (HR=0.09; 95% CI: 0.06–0.14) were superior to vehicle controls (p&amp;lt;0.001). Similar to the clinical results in the Phase III randomized RTOG 0525 trial, survival with the dose-dense TMZ was no different than standard dosing (p=0.88, HR=0.98; 95% CI: 0.72-1.32). In an analysis of bevacizumab across 32 PDXs, mice were dosed once a week until moribund, and a minimum overall median survival benefit of 20% was used to define ‘responders’. Thirteen PDXs met this criterion, although the overall survival ratio among this subset was limited (range 1.21-1.65). Only 2 models had a 50% or greater survival benefit. Stratification by disease state (24 newly diagnosed vs 8 recurrent) showed equivalent performance (median survival benefit 1.13 for both). These results are consistent with the limited survival benefit observed with bevacizumab and the RTOG 0825 clinical trial. In summary, the results from these relatively inexpensive PDX studies demonstrate the potential of pre-clinical PDX trials to evaluate the extent of benefit and fraction of responsive PDXs to a novel therapeutic. If analyzed across an ‘adequate’ number of PDXs, these results potentially can be used to identify predictive biomarkers or to compare various treatment regimens prior to clinical testing. Citation Format: Danielle M Burgenske, Ann C Mladek, Katrina K Bakken, Zeng Hu, Brett L Carlson, Paul A Decker, Jeanette E Eckel-Passow, Jann N Sarkaria. The utility of pre-clinical trials in glioblastoma patient-derived xenografts (PDXs) models for informing clinical trial development of therapeutic strategies [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR-NCI-EORTC Virtual International Conference on Molecular Targets and Cancer Therapeutics; 2023 Oct 11-15; Boston, MA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Ther 2023;22(12 Suppl):Abstract nr A002.

SURG-11. RISKS AND BENEFITS OF REPEATED RESECTION FOR GLIOBLASTOMA: A SINGLE INSTITUTION REVIEW OF CHARACTERISTICS AND OUTCOMES OF RESECTION OF RECURRENT GLIOBLASTOMA

Abstract Maximal safe resection is standard for newly diagnosed glioblastoma, but for recurrent glioblastoma the value of resection is less clear. We performed a retrospective, single-institution analysis of sequential patients undergoing re-resection for recurrent glioblastoma and analyzed pre-operative risk factors, progression free and overall survival from time of re-resection to death or last follow-up (PFS/OS), and complication rates. Between 2017 and 2022, 38 patients underwent re-resection of glioblastoma (defined by 2016 WHO criteria, 86.8% IDH wild type) and were followed for an average of 157 weeks (range 17-553). The cohort had a mean age of 59.4 years (range 39-87), was 55% male, and included 68.4% MGMT unmethylated tumors. Preoperatively, median Karnofsky Performance Score (KPS) was 80 (range 50-100), and median modified frailty index (mFI-5) was 0 (range 0-4). Re-resection occurred an average of 55.3 weeks after initial resection (SD 59.6, range 5-314), 25.0 weeks after chemotherapy (SD 51.8), and 39.9 weeks after radiation (SD 45.1). Mean OS after re-resection was 67.4 weeks (SD 91.5, range 1-505 weeks), median 59.5 weeks. Average PFS was 24.5 weeks (SD 25.3, range 1-139). The complication rate was 34.2% (n = 15), including 6 patients (15.8%) with a wound infection and 5 (13.1%) with symptomatic hemorrhage. 12 (31.6%) patients had a new neurologic deficit. Postoperative KPS was lower than preoperative KPS (p = .002). Patients with &amp;lt;20 weeks between surgeries, mFI &amp;gt;1, or KPS &amp;lt;80 had higher rates of complications (respectively p = .04, p = .03, p = .03). Patients with mFI &amp;gt;1 or KPS &amp;lt;70 were more likely to die within 30-days of surgery (respectively p = .014; p = .018). Re-resection demonstrated a survival benefit, especially for patients younger than 65 with a mFI of &amp;lt; 2. Though complications were common, post-operative complications were not associated with a shorter overall survival. Consideration for age, frailty, KPS, and timing of surgery may guide selection of patients for re-resection.

CTNI-22. A PHASE 0/2 ‘TRIGGER’ TRIAL OF NIRAPARIB IN PATIENTS WITH NEWLY-DIAGNOSED GLIOBLASTOMA

Abstract BACKGROUND Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) mediates DNA damage response; niraparib is an investigational PARP1/2-selective inhibitor. This Phase 0 study evaluates newly-diagnosed glioblastoma (GBM) tumor pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD), graduating patients with O6-methylguanine methyltransferase (MGMT) unmethylated tumors into a therapeutic regimen of niraparib plus fractionated radiotherapy when PK threshold is met. METHODS Presumed newly-diagnosed GBM patients received 4 days of niraparib (300/200 mg QD) prior to planned resection 3-5 or 8-12 hours following the last dose. Tumor tissue (enhancing and non-enhancing regions), cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), and plasma were collected. Total and unbound niraparib concentrations were measured using validated LC-MS/MS methods. PARP inhibition was assessed by quantification of PAR induction after ex vivo irradiation of surgical vs non-irradiated tissue. A PK ‘trigger’ determined eligibility for the therapeutic expansion phase and was defined as unbound [niraparib] &amp;gt; 5-fold biochemical IC50 (i.e., 19 nM) in non-enhancing tumor. Patients with MGMT unmethylated tumors and positive PK were eligible for phase 2 dosing of niraparib plus radiotherapy followed by a maintenance phase of niraparib. RESULTS All phase 0 patients (n = 44) met the PK threshold. In non-enhancing tumor regions, the mean unbound concentration of niraparib was 226.7 nM (n = 38). PAR suppression after ex vivo radiation was observed in 71% of the patients (20/28). Eighteen out of 26 patients with unmethylated tumors enrolled in phase 2. Five of the 18 initial patients in phase 2 experienced grade 4 thrombocytopenia related to niraparib. All adverse events were resolved without sequelae. For patients who completed at least 6 months of follow-up, PFS6 was 64% (n = 11) with 9.2-month median follow-up. Median follow-up for all patients (n = 18) was 4.2 months with 8 patients remaining on treatment and 2 patients ongoing PFS6 follow-up. CONCLUSIONS Niraparib achieves pharmacologically-relevant concentrations in non-enhancing, newly-diagnosed GBM tissue in excess of any other studied PARP inhibitor.

A Combined Phase 0/2 "Trigger" Trial of Niraparib in Combination with Radiation in Patients with Newly-Diagnosed Glioblastoma

Poly ADP-ribose (PAR) polymerase (PARP) mediates DNA damage response. Niraparib is an investigational PARP1/2-selective inhibitor. We conducted a combined phase 0/2 study to evaluate niraparib pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) in patients with newly-diagnosed glioblastoma (GBM), graduating patients to a phase 2 study evaluating a therapeutic regimen of niraparib with concurrent conventionally-fractionated radiotherapy (RT) in O6-methylguanine methyltransferase (MGMT) unmethylated tumors exceeding a prespecified PK threshold in non-enhancing tumor. Patients with presumed newly-diagnosed GBM were enrolled in a phase 0 study receiving 4 days of niraparib (300 or 200 mg QD) prior to planned resection 3-5 or 8-12 hours following the last dose. Tumor tissue (enhancing and non-enhancing regions), cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), and plasma were collected. Total and unbound niraparib concentrations were measured using validated LC-MS/MS methods. PARP inhibition was assessed by quantification of PAR induction after 10 Gy ex vivo irradiation in surgical tissue compared to non-irradiated control tissue. A PK 'trigger' determined eligibility for the therapeutic phase 2 expansion portion of the study. This was defined as unbound [niraparib] > 5-fold biochemical IC50 (i.e., 19 nM) in non-enhancing tumor. Patients with MGMT unmethylated tumors exceeding this PK threshold were eligible for expansion phase dosing of niraparib with concurrent RT followed by a maintenance phase of niraparib. Patients with MGMT methylated tumors were not eligible for the expansion phase and proceeded with temozolomide (TMZ) plus RT followed by maintenance TMZ. RT dose was 60 Gy in 30 fractions using volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT). All 29 patients enrolled in the phase 0 portion of the study met the PK threshold. In non-enhancing regions, the mean unbound concentration of niraparib was 258.2 nM. The suppression of PAR levels after ex vivo RT was observed in 79% of the patients (17/22). Sixteen patients had unmethylated tumors, and of those, 11 patients enrolled in phase 2. Five of the 6 initial patients enrolled in phase 2 experienced thrombocytopenia related to niraparib, and 3/5 cases were deemed serious and life-threatening. Consequently, starting dose in both phases was lowered to 200 mg, and no serious AEs were observed thereafter. At a median follow-up of 8.1 months [range: 6.0-12.9 months], 6-month PFS was 64% with 4 patients remaining on treatment and 5 patients ongoing survival follow-up. Niraparib achieves pharmacologically-relevant concentrations in non-enhancing, newly-diagnosed GBM tissue in excess of any other studied PARP inhibitor. When delivered with concurrent RT, niraparib was well-tolerated, with low rates of grade 3+ toxicity. Initial clinical efficacy data are encouraging.

JS05.5.A INTRAOPERATIVE MRI-GUIDED RESECTION IS NOT SUPERIOR TO 5-ALA-GUIDANCE IN NEWLY DIAGNOSED GLIOBLASTOMA: A PROSPECTIVE CONTROLLED MULTICENTER CLINICAL TRIAL

Abstract BACKGROUND Prospective data suggested a superiority of intraoperative MRI (iMRI) over 5-aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA) for achieving complete resections of contrast enhancement in glioblastoma surgery. We investigated this hypothesis in a prospective clinical trial and correlated residual disease volumes with clinical outcome in newly diagnosed glioblastoma. MATERIAL AND METHODS This is a prospective controlled multicenter parallel-group trial with two center-specific treatment arms (5-ALA and iMRI) and blinded evaluation. The primary endpoint was complete resection of contrast enhancement on early postoperative MRI. We assessed resectability and extent of resection by an independent blinded centralized review of pre- and post-operative MRI with 1mm slices. Secondary endpoints included progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS), patient-reported quality of life and clinical parameters. RESULTS We recruited 314 patients with newly diagnosed glioblastomas at eleven German centers. 127 patients in the 5-ALA and 150 in the iMRI arm were analyzed in the as treated analysis. Complete resections, defined as a residual tumor ≤0.175 cm³, were achieved in 90 patients (78%) in the 5-ALA and 115 (81%) in the iMRI arm (p=0.79). Incision-suture times (p&amp;lt;0.001) were significantly longer in the iMRI arm (316 vs. 215 [5-ALA] minutes). Median PFS and OS were comparable in both arms. The lack of any residual contrast enhancing tumor (0cm³) was a significant favorable prognostic factor for PFS (p&amp;lt;0.001) and OS (p=0.048), especially in MGMT unmethylated tumors (p=0.006). CONCLUSION We could not confirm superiority of iMRI over 5-ALA for achieving complete resections. Neurosurgical interventions in newly diagnosed glioblastoma shall aim for safe complete resections with 0 cm³ contrast-enhancing residual disease, as any other residual tumor volume is a negative predictor for PFS and OS.

A phase 0/2 trigger trial of niraparib in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma.

2069 Background: Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) mediates DNA damage response; niraparib is an investigational PARP1/2-selective inhibitor. This Phase 0 study evaluates newly-diagnosed glioblastoma (GBM) tumor pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD), graduating patients with O6-methylguanine methyltransferase (MGMT) unmethylated tumors into a therapeutic regimen of niraparib plus fractionated radiotherapy when high unbound drug concentrations are present in gadolinium-nonenhancing tumor. Methods: Patients with presumed newly-diagnosed GBM were enrolled in a phase 0 study receiving 4 days of niraparib (300/200 mg QD) prior to planned resection 3-5 or 8-12 hours following the last dose. Tumor tissue (enhancing and non-enhancing regions), cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), and plasma were collected. Total and unbound niraparib concentrations were measured using validated LC-MS/MS methods. PARP inhibition was assessed by quantification of PAR induction after 10 Gy ex vivo irradiation in surgical tissue compared to non-irradiated control tissue. A PK ‘trigger’ determined eligibility for the therapeutic expansion phase and was defined as unbound [niraparib] &gt; 5-fold biochemical IC50 (i.e., 19 nM) in non-enhancing tumor. Patients with MGMT unmethylated tumors exceeding this PK threshold were eligible for expansion phase dosing of niraparib plus radiotherapy followed by a maintenance phase of niraparib. Results: All patients (n=35) enrolled in the phase 0 portion of the study met the PK threshold. In non-enhancing tumor regions, the mean unbound concentration of niraparib was 253.2 nM in 32 evaluable GBM patients. The suppression of PAR levels after ex vivo radiation was observed in 75% of the patients (18/24). Eleven out of 18 patients with unmethylated tumors enrolled in phase 2. Five of the 6 initial patients enrolled in phase 2 experienced thrombocytopenia related to niraparib, and 3/5 cases were deemed serious and life-threatening. Consequently, starting dose in both phases was lowered to 200 mg, and no serious AEs were observed thereafter. At a median follow-up of 8.1 months [range: 6.0-12.9 months], PFS6 was 64% (n=11) with 4 patients remaining on treatment and 5 patients ongoing survival follow-up. Conclusions: Niraparib achieves pharmacologically-relevant concentrations in non-enhancing, newly-diagnosed GBM tissue in excess of any other studied PARP inhibitor. Clinical trial information: NCT05076513 .

Adenylate kinase 2 is a biomarker related to the prognosis of glioma and the immune microenvironment.

Among the brain and the other central nervous system, gliomas are the most prevalent malignant primary tumors. Adenylate kinase 2 (AK2) is generally thought to be crucial for energy metabolism and signal transduction. Several disorders are correlated with its aberrant expression. However, it is unclear what functions AK2 might have in gliomas. We investigated the relationship between AK2 expression and clinicopathological features of glioma patients using information obtained from public databases and patient tissue microarrays. AK2 knockdown glioma cell lines were constructed to explore how AK2 affects glioma progress. The association between AK2 and the immune microenvironment in gliomas was evaluated by multiple methods. AK2 expression was higher in glioma samples than in normal brain tissues. Older patients and those with higher-grade, IDH-wildtype, 1p/19q codeletion-free, and MGMT-unmethylated tumors had higher levels of AK2 expression, linking to poor outcomes. Thus, gliomas with high AK2 expression have a worse prognosis. GO and KEGG analyses demonstrated that AK2 was relevant to cell division and DNA replication. Downregulation of AK2 suppresses cell proliferation, migration, and colony formation of glioma cell lines in vitro. AK2 expression was positively connected to the inhibitory immune checkpoints, also correlating with immune infiltration degree. In this study, AK2 may be a potential biological target for more precise molecular therapy of gliomas, since its high expression is associated with worse outcomes and a more malignant immune microenvironment.

Peritumoral ADC Values Correlate with the MGMT Methylation Status in Patients with Glioblastoma

Different results have been reported concerning the relationship of the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values and the status of methylation as the promoter gene for the enzyme methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) in patients with glioblastomas (GBs). The aim of this study was to investigate if there were correlations between the ADC values of the enhancing tumor and peritumoral areas of GBs and the MGMT methylation status. In this retrospective study, we included 42 patients with newly diagnosed unilocular GB with one MRI study prior to any treatment and histopathological data. After co-registration of ADC maps with T1-weighted sequences after contrast administration and dynamic susceptibility contrast (DSC) perfusion, we manually selected one region-of-interest (ROI) in the enhancing and perfused tumor and one ROI in the peritumoral white matter. Both ROIs were mirrored in the healthy hemisphere for normalization. In the peritumoral white matter, absolute and normalized ADC values were significantly higher in patients with MGMT-unmethylated tumors, as compared to patients with MGMT-methylated tumors (absolute values p = 0.002, normalized p = 0.0007). There were no significant differences in the enhancing tumor parts. The ADC values in the peritumoral region correlated with MGMT methylation status, confirmed by normalized ADC values. In contrast to other studies, we could not find a correlation between the ADC values or the normalized ADC values and the MGMT methylation status in the enhancing tumor parts.

Depatuxizumab mafodotin in EGFR-amplified newly diagnosed glioblastoma: A phase III randomized clinical trial.

Approximately 50% of newly diagnosed glioblastomas (GBMs) harbor epidermal growth factor receptor gene amplification (EGFR-amp). Preclinical and early-phase clinical data suggested efficacy of depatuxizumab mafodotin (depatux-m), an antibody-drug conjugate comprised of a monoclonal antibody that binds activated EGFR (overexpressed wild-type and EGFRvIII-mutant) linked to a microtubule-inhibitor toxin in EGFR-amp GBMs. In this phase III trial, adults with centrally confirmed, EGFR-amp newly diagnosed GBM were randomized 1:1 to radiotherapy, temozolomide, and depatux-m/placebo. Corneal epitheliopathy was treated with a combination of protocol-specified prophylactic and supportive measures. There was 85% power to detect a hazard ratio (HR) ≤0.75 for overall survival (OS) at a 2.5% 1-sided significance level (ie traditional two-sided p ≤ 0.05) by log-rank testing. There were 639 randomized patients (median age 60, range 22-84; 62% men). Prespecified interim analysis found no improvement in OS for depatux-m over placebo (median 18.9 vs. 18.7 months, HR 1.02, 95% CI 0.82-1.26, 1-sided p = 0.63). Progression-free survival was longer for depatux-m than placebo (median 8.0 vs. 6.3 months; HR 0.84, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.70-1.01, p = 0.029), particularly among those with EGFRvIII-mutant (median 8.3 vs. 5.9 months, HR 0.72, 95% CI 0.56-0.93, 1-sided p = 0.002) or MGMT unmethylated (HR 0.77, 95% CI 0.61-0.97; 1-sided p = 0.012) tumors but without an OS improvement. Corneal epitheliopathy occurred in 94% of depatux-m-treated patients (61% grade 3-4), causing 12% to discontinue. Interim analysis demonstrated no OS benefit for depatux-m in treating EGFR-amp newly diagnosed GBM. No new important safety risks were identified.

Stereotactic radiosurgery for glioblastoma considering tumor genetic profiles: an international multicenter study.

Molecular profiles, such as isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutation and O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) methylation status, have important prognostic roles for glioblastoma patients. The authors studied the efficacy and safety of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for glioblastoma patients with consideration of molecular tumor profiles. For this retrospective observational multiinstitutional study, the authors pooled consecutive patients who were treated using SRS for glioblastoma at eight institutions participating in the International Radiosurgery Research Foundation. They evaluated predictors of overall and progression-free survival with consideration of IDH mutation and MGMT methylation status. Ninety-six patients (median age 56 years) underwent SRS (median dose 15 Gy and median treatment volume 5.53 cm3) at 147 tumor sites (range 1 to 7). The majority of patients underwent prior fractionated radiation therapy (92%) and temozolomide chemotherapy (98%). Most patients were treated at recurrence (85%), and boost SRS was used for 12% of patients. The majority of patients harbored IDH wild-type (82%) and MGMT-methylated (62%) tumors. Molecular data were unavailable for 33 patients. Median survival durations after SRS were similar between patients harboring IDH wild-type tumors and those with IDH mutant tumors (9.0 months vs 11 months, respectively), as well as between those with MGMT-methylated tumors and those with MGMT-unmethylated tumors (9.8 vs. 9.0 months, respectively). Prescription dose > 15 Gy (OR 0.367, 95% CI 0.190-0.709, p = 0.003) and treatment volume > 5 cm3 (OR 1.036, 95% CI 1.007-1.065, p = 0.014) predicted overall survival after controlling for age and IDH status. Treatment volume > 5 cm3 (OR 2.215, 95% CI 1.159-4.234, p = 0.02) and absence of gross-total resection (OR 0.403, 95% CI 0.208-0.781, p = 0.007) were associated with inferior local control of SRS-treated lesions in multivariate models. Nine patients experienced adverse radiation events after SRS, and 7 patients developed radiation necrosis at 59 to 395 days after SRS. Post-SRS survival was similar as a function of IDH mutation and MGMT promoter methylation status, suggesting that molecular profiles of glioblastoma should be considered when selecting candidates for SRS. SRS prescription dose > 15 Gy and treatment volume ≤ 5 cm3 were associated with longer survival, independent of age and IDH status. Prior gross-total resection and smaller treatment volume were associated with superior local control.

Novel dopamine receptor 3 antagonists inhibit the growth of primary and temozolomide resistant glioblastoma cells.

Treatment for the lethal primary adult brain tumor glioblastoma (GBM) includes the chemotherapy temozolomide (TMZ), but TMZ resistance is common and correlates with promoter methylation of the DNA repair enzyme O-6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT). To improve treatment of GBMs, including those resistant to TMZ, we explored the potential of targeting dopamine receptor signaling. We found that dopamine receptor 3 (DRD3) is expressed in GBM and is also a previously unexplored target for therapy. We identified novel antagonists of DRD3 that decreased the growth of GBM xenograft-derived neurosphere cultures with minimal toxicity against human astrocytes and/or induced pluripotent stem cell-derived neurons. Among a set of DRD3 antagonists, we identified two compounds, SRI-21979 and SRI-30052, that were brain penetrant and displayed a favorable therapeutic window analysis of The Cancer Genome Atlas data demonstrated that higher levels of DRD3 (but not DRD2 or DRD4) were associated with worse prognosis in primary, MGMT unmethylated tumors. These data suggested that DRD3 antagonists may remain efficacious in TMZ-resistant GBMs. Indeed, SRI-21979, but not haloperidol, significantly reduced the growth of TMZ-resistant GBM cells. Together our data suggest that DRD3 antagonist-based therapies may provide a novel therapeutic option for the treatment of GBM.

Abstract IA-006: Enhancing the therapeutic ratio for glioblastoma by combining radiation therapy with PARP inhibitors

Abstract PARP inhibitors (PARPi) enhance radiation sensitivity in multiple cancer models, both in vitro and in vivo. Our observation that the radiosensitizing properties of PARPi are most pronounced in rapidly proliferating cells is reflected in early phase clinical trial data showing exacerbation of acute radiation toxicity in rapidly proliferating tissues such as oropharyngeal and esophageal mucosa. Lack of radiosensitization in late responding, slowly proliferating normal tissues indicates that PARPi may be more effectively combined with radiation therapy (RT) in patients with brain tumors. We are therefore evaluating the oral PARPi olaparib in combination with RT and/or temozolomide (TMZ) in the treatment of glioblastoma (GBM), the most prevalent and most aggressive primary brain tumor. Patients with GBM experience very poor outcomes in terms of median survival (c.1 year) and neurocognitive decline caused primarily by RT. Olaparib was initially evaluated in combination with daily low-dose TMZ in patients with recurrent GBM in the OPARATIC trial. Pharmacokinetic studies revealed that olaparib penetrates both core and margin regions of GBM, indicating that the BBB is significantly disrupted throughout these tumors. Olaparib could be safely combined with daily TMZ (75 mg/m2), but intermittent olaparib dosing (150 mg three days per week) was required to avoid dose-limiting hematological toxicity. Early phase testing of the olaparib-radiotherapy combination is now underway in three populations of patients with newly diagnosed GBM. Patients aged &amp;gt;65 with MGMT unmethylated GBM are being recruited to a randomized, placebo-controlled phase II study (PARADIGM) after a phase I dose escalation study showed that olaparib (200 mg twice daily) was extremely well tolerated when combined with brain irradiation (40 Gray in 15#). Good performance status patients aged &amp;lt;70 are being recruited to two parallel phase I dose escalation studies: patients with MGMT unmethylated tumors are receiving daily olaparib with RT (60 Gy in 30#) without TMZ, while patients with MGMT methylated tumors are receiving intermittent olaparib with standard chemoradiation (60 Gy). The impact of PARPi on RT induced neurotoxicity is being investigated in preclinical studies. In vitro data show that PARPi reduce proliferation of neural stem cells and protect them against RT induced apoptosis, while in vivo studies support the emerging concept that RT induced neuroinflammation is important in the pathogenesis of neurotoxicity. Importantly, preliminary PET and immunohistochemical studies have shown robust anti-neuroinflammatory effects of PARPi in this context. Ongoing experiments are defining the roles of microglia, astrocytes and neurogenesis in this phenomenon. These diverse data sets provide support for our hypothesis that combining PARPi with RT has potential to improve outcomes for GBM patients by enhancing tumor control while simultaneously suppressing neuroinflammation and alleviating RT related neurocognitive decline. Citation Format: Anthony J. Chalmers, Rodrigo Gutierrez-Quintana, David J. Walker, Karin Williams, Duncan Forster, Mark R. Jackson, Sarah Derby, Jon Stobo, Lorna Sweeting, Caroline Kelly, Stephen Durant, Kaye J. Williams. Enhancing the therapeutic ratio for glioblastoma by combining radiation therapy with PARP inhibitors [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Virtual Special Conference on Radiation Science and Medicine; 2021 Mar 2-3. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2021;27(8_Suppl):Abstract nr IA-006.

Clinical, radiological and genomic features and targeted therapy in BRAF V600E mutant adult glioblastoma.

Although uncommon, detection of BRAF V600E mutations in adult patients with glioblastoma has become increasingly relevant given the widespread application of molecular diagnostics and encouraging therapeutic activity of BRAF/MEK inhibitors. We performed a retrospective study of adult glioblastoma patients treated at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/Brigham and Women's Hospital or Massachusetts General Hospital from January 2011 to July 2019 with an identified BRAF V600E mutation by either immunohistochemistry or molecular testing. Patient characteristics, molecular genomics, and preoperative MRI were analyzed. Nineteen glioblastoma patients were included, with median age at diagnosis of 41-years-old (range 22-69). Only 1/18 was IDH1/2-mutant; 10/17 had MGMT unmethylated tumors. The most common additional molecular alterations were CDKN2A/2B biallelic loss/loss-of-function (10/13, 76.9%), polysomy 7 (8/12, 66.7%), monosomy 10 (5/12, 41.7%), PTEN biallelic loss/loss-of-function (5/13, 38.5%) and TERT promoter mutations (5/15, 33.3%). Most tumors were well-circumscribed (11/14) and all were contrast-enhancing on MRI. Twelve patients eventually developed subependymal or leptomeningeal dissemination. Six patients were treated with BRAF/MEK inhibition following disease progression after standard of care therapy, with 4/6 patients showing partial response or stable disease as best response. Median time to progression after BRAF/MEK inhibition was 6.0months (95% CI 1.2-11.8). Grade 1 skin rash was present in 2 patients, but no other adverse events were reported. Median OS for the entire cohort was 24.1months (95% CI 15.7-38.9). Understanding the natural history and features of BRAF V600E glioblastoma may help better identify patients for BRAF/MEK inhibition and select therapeutic strategies.

Partial resection offers an overall survival benefit over biopsy in MGMT-unmethylated IDH-wildtype glioblastoma patients

BackgroundIsocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH)-wildtype glioblastoma patients with O6-methylguanine-DNA-methyltransferase (MGMT)-unmethylated tumors have the worst outcome of all glioblastoma patients. The overall survival (OS) benefit of partial resection of glioblastoma compared to biopsy only remains controversial specifically in relation to molecular factors. In this report, we analyzed the effect of incomplete resection on OS compared to biopsy only in a cohort of IDH-wildtype glioblastoma patients who were uniformly treated with temozolomide-based chemoradiotherapy (TMZ-CR) after surgery.Material & MethodsA retrospective study was conducted including only glioblastoma patients who were treated with TMZ-CR after surgery from two centers. Surgical groups were defined as biopsy only, partial resection (PR) or gross total resection depending on the presence of contrast-enhancing tumor on postoperative imaging. IDH-mutation was determined using next generation sequencing technique and MGMT-methylation was analyzed with semi-quantitative methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction. Next to descriptive statistics, univariate and multivariate survival analyses were performed using Kaplan-Meier estimates and Cox regression models.ResultsIn total, 159 patients were included. 37 patients underwent biopsy only and 73 partial resections. 99 patients (62.3%) harbored unmethylated tumors. Median OS for the whole patient group was 13.4 months. In the subgroup of patients with unmethylated tumors, PR yielded a median OS of 12.2 months vs 7.6 months for biopsy patients (P = 0.003). PR proved an independent beneficial prognostic factor in multivariate Cox regression model, together with age, Karnofsky Performance Score and MGMT-methylation.ConclusionIn IDH-wildtype glioblastoma patients with MGMT-unmethylated tumors, treated with chemoradiotherapy after surgery, PR yields a significant OS benefit compared to biopsy.