Purpose: Our objective was to collect pilot data on the effect of intraarticular hyaluronic acid (HA) treatment on the gait variability of knee osteoarthritis (OA) patients. The degenerative knee changes, pain, and loss of function associated with knee OA can lead to a less stable walking pattern, increasing the risk for falling. Gait variability, specifically high stride time (StrTM), single support time (SSTM), and base of support (BSup) variability, has been shown to predict falls, and is associated with mobility decline and disability. Intra-articular HA knee injections are used to control pain in knee OA patients; however, evidence on the effect of HA on spatio-temporal gait performance is limited. We hypothesized that knee OA patients treated with HA would experience greater reductions in pain and gait variability than matched controls receiving placebo injections (P). Methods: Thirty older adults with mild to moderate radiographically diagnosed knee OA were equally randomized to receive 3 consecutive weekly knee injections of 2 ml HA (20 mg of HA) or 1.2 ml P (0.001 mg of HA). Fast gait characteristics were determined with a 10 metre electronic walkway (GAITRite System), and clinical outcomes of knee pain, stiffness, and physical function were assessed using the WOMAC OA Index. Gait variability was determined by calculating the coefficient of variation (CoV) for each of StrTM, SSTM, and BSupp. Treatment effects were determined by comparing baseline outcomes to those three (3m) and six months (6m) post-treatment, using repeated measures ANCOVA, controlling for baseline fear of falling. Results: The participants were [Mx (SD)] 72.44 (6.11) years old and all lived within the community. The StrTM, SSTM, and BSup CoV of the HA group remained relatively unchanged throughout the study, while these same measures of gait variability increased for the P group, with the greatest increases observed at 6m. However, there were no significant differences between the HA and P groups regarding the CoV for StrTM [Mean difference (95%CI)] [0.25 (0.70; 0.20)], SSTM [0.48 (1.35; 0.39)], or BSup [0.87 (6.77; 5.03)]. The HA group experienced greater reduction in WOMAC scores than the P group, however, there were no significant differences between the HA and P groups regarding the WOMAC subsections of pain [2.27 (4.75; 0.22)], stiffness [0.80 (1.78; 0.18)], and physical function [6.63 (14.35; 1.10)]. Conclusions: The results of this small sample study demonstrate that gait variability in knee OA patients was not reduced with intra-articular HA treatment. However, the trends observed in the results indicate that when compared to intra-articular P, intra-articular HA may maintain gait function in knee OA patients by preventing further increases in gait variability, particularly in StrTM and SSTM variability. Since gait disturbances are important risk factors for falling, these preliminary results provide rationale for further investigation in a larger trial assessing the effect of intra-articular HA on gait variability, and in reducing the risk of falling and mobility decline in the elder knee OA population.
Read full abstract