Mg Of Enantiomer Research Articles

Stereoselectiveseparation of racemic trans-paroxol, N-methylparoxetine and paroxetine containing two chiral carbon centres by countercurrent chromatography

Racemic trans-paroxol, trans-N-methylparoxetine and trans-paroxetine containing two chiral centres were stereoselectively separated using countercurrent chromatography with hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin as the chiral selector. A two-phase solvent system composed of n-butyl acetate and 0.1 mol L−1 sodium carbonate-sodium bicarbonate buffer at pH 9.2 (1:1, v/v) was selected, and 0.10 mol L−1 hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin was added to the aqueous phase as the chiral selector. Racemic trans-N-methylparoxetine and racemic trans-paroxol (20 mg of each) were stereoselectively separated by countercurrent chromatography in an individual run, yielding 7.1–8.3 mg of enantiomers with a purity of 95–98%, where the recovery of each separated isomer reached approximately 70–83%. Racemic trans-paroxetine (20 mg) was stereoselectively separated by countercurrent chromatography using a recycling elution mode with a biphasic solvent system composed of n-hexane: n-butyl acetate: 0.1 mol L−1 sodium carbonate-sodium bicarbonate buffer at pH 9.2 (9:1:10, v/v/v), and 0.10 mol L−1 hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin was added to the aqueous phase as the chiral selector, yielding 5.0–5.6 mg of enantiomer with a high purity of over 98–99%.

Application and Comparison of High-Speed Countercurrent Chromatography and High Performance Liquid Chromatography in Preparative Enantioseparation of α-Substitution Mandelic Acids

This paper is mainly about extending research on application and comparison of preparative high-speed countercurrent chromatography (HSCCC) and preparative high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) in chiral separations. Preparative enantioseparations of α-cyclopentylmandelic acid and α-methylmandelic acid by HSCCC and HPLC were compared using hydroxypropy-β-cyclodextrin (HP-β-CD) and sulfobutyl ether-β-cyclodextrin (SBE-β-CD) as the chiral mobile phase additives. In preparative HPLC the enantioseparation was achieved on the ODS C18 reverse phase column with the mobile phase composed of a mixture of acetonitrile and 0.10 mol L−1 phosphate buffer at pH 2.68 containing 20 mmol L−1 HP-β-CD for α-cyclopentylmandelic acid and 20 mmol L−1 SBE-β-CD for α-methylmandelic acid. The maximum sample size for α-cyclopentylmandelic acid and α-methylmandelic acid was only about 10 mg and 5 mg, respectively. In preparative HSCCC the enantioseparations of these two racemates were performed with the two-phase solvent system composed of n-hexane-methyl tert.-butyl ether-0.1 molL−1 phosphate buffer solution at pH 2.67 containing 0.1 mol L−1 HP-β-CD for α-cyclopentylmandelic acid (8.5:1.5:10, v/v/v) and 0.1 mol L−1 SBE-β-CD for α-methylmandelic acid (3:7:10, v/v/v). Under the optimum separation conditions, totally 250 mg of racemic α-cyclopentylmandelic acid could be completely enantioseparated by HSCCC with HP-β-CD as a chiral mobile phase additive in a single run, yielding 114-116 mg of enantiomers with 98-99% purity and 89-92% recovery. But, no complete enantioseparation of α-methylmandelic acid was achieved by preparative HSCCC with either of the chiral selectors due to their limited enantioselectivity. In this paper, preparative enantioseparation by HSCCC and HPLC was compared from various aspects.