methylguanine-DNA Methyltransferase Promoter Methylation Status Research Articles

MGMT promoter methylation prediction based on multiparametric MRI via vision graph neural network.

Glioblastoma (GBM) is aggressive and malignant. The methylation status of the -methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter in GBM tissue is considered an important biomarker for developing the most effective treatment plan. Although the standard method for assessing the MGMT promoter methylation status is via bisulfite modification and deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) sequencing of biopsy or surgical specimens, a secondary automated method based on medical imaging may improve the efficiency and accuracy of those tests. We propose a deep vision graph neural network (ViG) using multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to predict the MGMT promoter methylation status noninvasively. Our model was compared to the RSNA radiogenomic classification winners. The dataset includes 583 usable patient cases. Combinations of MRI sequences were compared. Our multi-sequence fusion strategy was compared with those using single MR sequences. Our best model [Fluid Attenuated Inversion Recovery (FLAIR), T1-weighted pre-contrast (T1w), T2-weighted (T2)] outperformed the winning models with a test area under the curve (AUC) of 0.628, an accuracy of 0.632, a precision of 0.646, a recall of 0.677, a specificity of 0.581, and an F1 score of 0.661. Compared to the winning models with single MR sequences, our ViG utilizing fused-MRI showed a significant improvement statistically in AUC scores, which are FLAIR (), T1w (), T1wCE (), and T2 (). Our model is superior to challenge champions. A graph representation of the medical images enabled good handling of complexity and irregularity. Our work provides an automatic secondary check pipeline to ensure the correctness of MGMT methylation status prediction.

Quantitative Analysis of the MGMT Methylation Status of Glioblastomas in Light of the 2021 WHO Classification.

Simple SummaryThe status of a DNA repair protein called MGMT is a prognostic marker in patients with glioblastomas, the most frequent malignant brain tumor. Epigenetic silencing of this gene predicts increased sensitivity to chemotherapy. Silencing is assessed by analyzing modifications, so-called methylation, of a certain gene region. Whereas most studies report such information only in a qualitative manner, quantitative testing might provide additional information. The aim of our study was to determine a quantitative threshold for better survival among patients with glioblastomas. Among 321 patients suffering from glioblastoma, we found better survival in patients with glioblastomas that have ≥16% methylation of a particular region of the MGMT gene. Above 16% methylation, we found no additional benefit with increasing degree of methylation. We suggest using this threshold for selection in clinical trials and for patient counseling.Background: Glioblastomas with methylation of the promoter region of the O(6)-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) gene exhibit increased sensitivity to alkylating chemotherapy. Quantitative assessment of the MGMT promoter methylation status might provide additional prognostic information. The aim of our study was to determine a quantitative methylation threshold for better survival among patients with glioblastomas. Methods: We included consecutive patients ≥18 years treated at our department between 11/2010 and 08/2018 for a glioblastoma, IDH wildtype, undergoing quantitative MGMT promoter methylation analysis. The primary endpoint was overall survival. Results: A total of 321 patients were included. Median overall survival was 12.6 months. Kaplan–Meier and adjusted Cox regression analysis showed better survival for the groups with 16–30%, 31–60%, and 61–100% methylation. In contrast, survival in the group with 1–15% methylation was similar to those with unmethylated promoter regions. A secondary analysis confirmed this threshold. Conclusions: Better survival is observed in patients with glioblastomas with ≥16% methylation of the MGMT promoter region than with <16% methylation. Survival with tumors with 1–15% methylation is similar to with unmethylated tumors. Above 16% methylation, we found no additional benefit with increasing methylation.

Associations among smoking, IDH mutations, MGMT promoter methylation, and grading in glioma: a cross-sectional study

Background Several molecular markers have important roles in glioma management. Mutations in the isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) gene are associated with the grading and prognosis of glioma. Methylation in the promoter region of the O (6)-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) gene is an important determinant of glioma sensitivity to alkylating agents. Studies in various cancers indicated that IDH1 mutations and MGMT promoter methylations were associated with smoking habits. However, these associations in gliomas are still unclear. Accordingly, this study aimed to examine the association among smoking, IDH1 mutations, MGMT promoter methylation, and grading in glioma patients. Methods Patients were recruited from Dr. Sardjito General Hospital (a referral hospital in Yogyakarta and Central Java region) and its network hospitals. Genomic DNA was extracted from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded samples or fresh glioma tissues. Identification of IDH1 mutation was performed using Polymerase Chain Reaction-Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism (PCR-RFLP) or DNA sequencing. Methylation-specific real-time PCR was performed to identify MGMT promoter methylation status. Smoking status was obtained by history taken from the patient or family members. Results In total, 122 patients were included in this study. As many as 35 patients (28.7%) had a smoking history. Most smokers (57.1%) smoke less than ten cigarettes per day. However, most of them (68.8%) have been smoking for more than 20 years. Smoking patients have a significantly higher proportion of high-grade glioma than non-smokers (80% vs. 55.2%, p=0.01). Among 122 patients, 24 (19.7%) of them carried IDH1 mutation. Smoking patients have a significantly higher proportion of IDH1 mutation compared with non-smokers (31.4% vs. 14.9%, p&lt;0.001). No significant association was found between intensity and duration of smoking with IDH1 mutations and glioma grading. No significant association was found between smoking and MGMT promoter methylation. Conclusions In glioma patients, smoking is associated with IDH1 mutations and grading but not with MGMT promoter methylation.

Is a reduction of radiation dose feasible in patients affected by glioblastoma undergoing radio-chemotherapy according to MGMT promoter methylation status without jeopardizing survival?

ObjectiveTo explore therapeutic results of different radiotherapy (RT) dose schedules combined to Temozolomide (TMZ)-RT treatment in newly diagnosed glioblastoma (GB), according to the O (6)-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) methylation status. Patients and methodsPatients with newly diagnosed GB received either standard (60-59.4 Gy) or reduced (54-52 Gy) dose radiation therapy (RT) with concurrent and adjuvant TMZ between June 2010 and October 2016. We retrospectively evaluated the therapeutic effectiveness of the RT ranges schedules in terms of overall survival (OS) with univariate and multivariate analysis, after analyzing the MGMT methylation status. ResultsOne hundred and seventeen patients were selected for the present analysis out of 146 total treated patients accrued. Seventy-two out of the selected cases received the standard RT-TMZ course (SDRT-TMZ) whereas the remaining 45 underwent the reduced dose schedule (RDRT-TMZ). The analysis according to the MGMT promoter methylation status showed that, in methylated-MGMT GB patients, SDRT-TMZ and RDRT-TMZ groups did not show different median OS (p = ns) according to the two RT schedules, independently by the extent of surgical resection. Instead, a difference in survival outcomes was confirmed in unmethylated-MGMT GB patients with better survival for patients undergoing to SDRT, particularly in sub-total resection. ConclusionIn our experience, a reduction of radiation dose schedule does not seem to jeopardize survival in methylated-MGMT patients independently by the extent of resection.A therapeutic approach to a standard reduction of RT dose for the methylated subset of patients may be feasible and could deserve prospective trials for validation.

Prognostic value of test(s) for O6 -methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation for predicting overall survival in people with glioblastoma treated with temozolomide

Background Glioblastoma is an aggressive form of brain cancer. Approximately five in 100 people with glioblastoma survive for five years past diagnosis. Glioblastomas that have a particular modification to their DNA (called methylation) in a particular region (the O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter) respond better to treatment with chemotherapy using a drug called temozolomide. Objectives To determine which method for assessing MGMT methylation status best predicts overall survival in people diagnosed with glioblastoma who are treated with temozolomide. Search methods We searched MEDLINE, Embase, BIOSIS, Web of Science Conference Proceedings Citation Index to December 2018, and examined reference lists. For economic evaluation studies, we additionally searched NHS Economic Evaluation Database (EED) up to December 2014. Selection criteria Eligible studies were longitudinal (cohort) studies of adults with diagnosed glioblastoma treated with temozolomide with/without radiotherapy/surgery. Studies had to have related MGMT status in tumour tissue (assessed by one or more method) with overall survival and presented results as hazard ratios or with sufficient information (e.g. Kaplan-Meier curves) for us to estimate hazard ratios. We focused mainly on studies comparing two or more methods, and listed brief details of articles that examined a single method of measuring MGMT promoter methylation. We also sought economic evaluations conducted alongside trials, modelling studies and cost analysis. Data collection and analysis Two review authors independently undertook all steps of the identification and data extraction process for multiple-method studies. We assessed risk of bias and applicability using our own modified and extended version of the QUality In Prognosis Studies (QUIPS) tool. We compared different techniques, exact promoter regions (5'-cytosine-phosphate-guanine-3' (CpG) sites) and thresholds for interpretation within studies by examining hazard ratios. We performed meta-analyses for comparisons of the three most commonly examined methods (immunohistochemistry (IHC), methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction (MSP) and pyrosequencing (PSQ)), with ratios of hazard ratios (RHR), using an imputed value of the correlation between results based on the same individuals. Main results We included 32 independent cohorts involving 3474 people that compared two or more methods. We found evidence that MSP (CpG sites 76 to 80 and 84 to 87) is more prognostic than IHC for MGMT protein at varying thresholds (RHR 1.31, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.01 to 1.71). We also found evidence that PSQ is more prognostic than IHC for MGMT protein at various thresholds (RHR 1.36, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.84). The data suggest that PSQ (mainly at CpG sites 74 to 78, using various thresholds) is slightly more prognostic than MSP at sites 76 to 80 and 84 to 87 (RHR 1.14, 95% CI 0.87 to 1.48). Many variants of PSQ have been compared, although we did not see any strong and consistent messages from the results. Targeting multiple CpG sites is likely to be more prognostic than targeting just one. In addition, we identified and summarised 190 articles describing a single method for measuring MGMT promoter methylation status. Authors' conclusions PSQ and MSP appear more prognostic for overall survival than IHC. Strong evidence is not available to draw conclusions with confidence about the best CpG sites or thresholds for quantitative methods. MSP has been studied mainly for CpG sites 76 to 80 and 84 to 87 and PSQ at CpG sites ranging from 72 to 95. A threshold of 9% for CpG sites 74 to 78 performed better than higher thresholds of 28% or 29% in two of three good-quality studies making such comparisons.

Predictors of Response to Autologous Dendritic Cell Therapy in Glioblastoma Multiforme.

Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common and lethal primary malignant glioma in adults. Dendritic cell (DC) vaccines have demonstrated promising results in GBM clinical trials. However, some patients do not respond well to DC therapy, with survival rates similar to those of conventional therapy. We retrospectively analyzed clinical and laboratory data to evaluate the factors affecting vaccine treatment. Forty-seven patients with de novo GBM were enrolled at China Medical University Hospital between 2005 and 2010 and divided into two subgroups. One subgroup of 27 patients received postsurgical adjuvant immunotherapy with autologous dendritic cell/tumor antigen vaccine (ADCTA) in conjunction with conventional treatment of concomitant chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) with temozolomide. The other 20 patients received only postsurgical conventional treatment without immunotherapy. Immunohistochemistry for CD45, CD4, CD8, programed death ligand 1 (PD-L1), and programed death 1 (PD-1) was performed on sections of surgical tumor specimens and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). Pearson's correlation, Cox proportional hazard model, and Kaplan-Meier analyses were performed to examine the correlations between the prognostic factors and survival rates. Younger age (<57 years), gross total resection, and CCRT and PD-1+ lymphocyte counts were significant prognostic factors of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in the ADCTA group. Sex, CD45+ lymphocyte count, CD4+ or CD8+ lymphocyte count, tumor PD-L1 expression, isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 mutation, and O6 methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase promoter methylation status were not significant factors in both groups. In the ADCTA group, patients with tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) with a lower PD-1+/CD8+ ratio (≤0.21) had longer OS and PFS (median OS 60.97 months, P < 0.001 and PFS 11.2 months, P < 0.008) compared to those with higher PD-1+/CD8+ ratio (>0.21) (median OS 20.07 months, P < 0.001 and PFS 4.43 months, P < 0.008). Similar results were observed in patients' PBMCs; lymphocyte counts with lower PD-1+/CD8+ ratio (≤0.197) had longer OS and PFS. There was a significant correlation of PD-1+/CD8+ ratio between TILs and PBMCs (Pearson's correlation R2 = 0.6002, P < 0.001). By contrast, CD4-, CD8-, but PD-1+, CD45+ tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes have no impact on OS and PFS (P = 0.073 and P = 0.249, respectively). For patients receiving DC vaccine adjuvant therapy, better outcomes are predicted in patients with younger age, with TILs or PBMCs with lower PD-1+/CD8+ ratio, with gross tumor resection, and receiving CCRT.

A 4-miRNAs signature predicts survival in glioblastoma multiforme patients.

Although O(6)-methylguanine DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation status is an important marker for glioblastoma multiforme (GBM), there is considerable variability in the clinical outcome of patients with similar methylation profles. We examined whether a MicroRNA (miRNA) signature can be identified for predicting clinical outcomes and helping in treatment decisions. The differentially expressed miRNAs were evaluated in 6 pairs of short- (⩽ 450 days) and long-term survivors (>450 days) by using microarray. Real time quantitative PCR (qRT-PCR) was applied to further verify screened miRNAs with a greater number of samples (n= 48). Meanwhile, functional interpretation of miRNA profile was carried out based on miRNA-target databases. In addition, MGMT promoter methylation status was tested by means of pyrosequencing (PSQ) testing. Six miRNAs were upregulated in the long-term survival group (fold change ⩾ 2.0, P< 0.05). The further verification by qRT-PCR indicated that the increase in let-7g-5p, miR-139-5p, miR-17-5p and miR-9-3p level in long-term survivors was statistically significant. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed that high expression of a prognostic 4-miRNA signature was significantly associated with good patient survival (p= 0.0012). The signature regulated signaling pathways including Calcium, MAPK, ErbB, mTOR and cell cycle involved in carcinogenesis from glial progenitor cell to primary GBM. The 4-miRNA signature was identified as an independent prognostic biomarker that identified patients who have a favorable outcome.

Patients Affected by Unmethylated O(6)-Methylguanine-DNA Methyltransferase Glioblastoma Undergoing Radiochemotherapy May Benefit from Moderately Dose-Escalated Radiotherapy.

Purpose To compare the therapeutic results of two radiotherapy (RT) dose schedules in combined temozolomide- (TMZ-) RT treatment in newly diagnosed glioblastoma (GB), according to the O(6)-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) methylation status. Material and Method Patients received either standard (60 Gy) or moderately escalated dose (70 Gy) radiotherapy (RT) with concomitant and adjuvant TMZ between June 2006 and October 2013. We retrospectively evaluated the therapeutic effectiveness of RT schedules in terms of Overall Survival (OS) and Progression-Disease Free Survival (PDFS) analyzing the MGMT methylation status. Results One hundred and seventeen patients were selected for the present analysis. Seventy-two out of the selected cases received the standard RT-TMZ course (SDRT-TMZ) whereas the remaining 45 underwent the escalated schedule (HDRT-TMZ). The analysis according to the MGMT promoter methylation status showed that, in unmethylated-MGMT GB patients, HDRT-TMZ and SDRT-TMZ groups had different median OS (p = 0,01) and PDFS (p = 0,007), that is, 8 months and 5 months for the SDRT-TMZ group and 14 months and 9 months for the HDRT-TMZ group, respectively. No difference in survival outcomes was found in methylated MGMT patients according to the two RT schedules (p = 0,12). Conclusions In our experience, unmethylated-MGMT GB patients benefited from a moderately escalated dose of RT plus TMZ.

MGMT promoter methylation determined by HRM in comparison to MSP and pyrosequencing for predicting high-grade glioma response

BackgroundThe DNA repair protein O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) causes resistance of cancer cells to alkylating agents and, therefore, is a well-established predictive marker for high-grade gliomas that are routinely treated with alkylating drugs. Since MGMT is highly epigenetically regulated, the MGMT promoter methylation status is taken as an indicator of MGMT silencing, predicting the outcome of glioma therapy. MGMT promoter methylation is usually determined by methylation specific PCR (MSP), which is a labor intensive and error-prone method often used semi-quantitatively. Searching for alternatives, we used closed-tube high resolution melt (HRM) analysis, which is a quantitative method, and compared it with MSP and pyrosequencing regarding its predictive value.ResultsWe analyzed glioblastoma cell lines with known MGMT activity and formalin-fixed samples from IDH1 wild-type high-grade glioma patients (WHO grade III/IV) treated with radiation and temozolomide by HRM, MSP, and pyrosequencing. The data were compared as to progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of patients exhibiting the methylated and unmethylated MGMT status. A promoter methylation cut-off level relevant for PFS and OS was determined. In a multivariate Cox regression model, methylation of MGMT promoter of high-grade gliomas analyzed by HRM, but not MSP, was found to be an independent predictive marker for OS. Univariate Kaplan–Meier analyses revealed for PFS and OS a significant and better discrimination between methylated and unmethylated tumors when quantitative HRM was used instead of MSP.ConclusionsCompared to MSP and pyrosequencing, the HRM method is simple, cost effective, highly accurate and fast. HRM is at least equivalent to pyrosequencing in quantifying the methylation level. It is superior in predicting PFS and OS of high-grade glioma patients compared to MSP and, therefore, can be recommended being used routinely for determination of the MGMT status of gliomas.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13148-016-0204-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Glioblastoma in the Canton of Zurich, Switzerland revisited: 2005 to 2009.

A population-based analysis of patients with glioma diagnosed between 1980 and 1994 in the Canton of Zurich in Switzerland confirmed the overall poor prognosis of glioblastoma. To explore changes in outcome, registry data were reevaluated for patients diagnosed between 2005 and 2009. Patients with glioblastoma who were diagnosed between 2005 and 2009 were identified by the Zurich and Zug Cancer Registry. The prognostic significance of epidemiological and clinical data, isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1)(R132H) mutation status, and O6 methylguanine DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation status was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and the Cox proportional hazards model. A total of 264 patients with glioblastoma were identified, for an annual incidence of 3.9 compared with the previous incidence of 3.7. The mean age of the patients at the time of diagnosis was 59.5 years in the current cohort compared with 61.3 years previously. The overall survival (OS) rate was 46.4% at 1 year, 22.5% at 2 years, and 14.4% at 3 years in the current study compared with 17.7% at 1 year, 3.3% at 2 years, and 1.2% at 3 years as reported previously. The median OS for all patients with glioblastoma was 11.5 months compared with 4.9 months in the former patient population. The median OS was 1.9 months for best supportive care, 6.2 months for radiotherapy alone, 6.7 months for temozolomide alone, and 17.0 months for radiotherapy plus temozolomide. Multivariate analysis revealed age, Karnofsky performance score, extent of tumor resection, first-line treatment, year of diagnosis, and MGMT promoter methylation status were associated with survival in patients with IDH1(R132H) -nonmutant glioblastoma. The OS of patients newly diagnosed with glioblastoma in the Canton of Zurich in Switzerland markedly improved from 1980 through 1994 to 2005 through 2009. Cancer 2016;122:2206-15. © 2016 American Cancer Society.

The tumoral A genotype of the MGMT rs34180180 single-nucleotide polymorphism in aggressive gliomas is associated with shorter patients' survival.

Malignant gliomas are the most common primary brain tumors. Grade III and IV gliomas harboring wild-type IDH1/2 are the most aggressive. In addition to surgery and radiotherapy, concomitant and adjuvant chemotherapy with temozolomide (TMZ) significantly improves overall survival (OS). The methylation status of the O(6)-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter is predictive of TMZ response and a prognostic marker of cancer outcome. However, the promoter regions the methylation of which correlates best with survival in aggressive glioma and whether the promoter methylation status predictive value could be refined or improved by other MGMT-associated molecular markers are not precisely known. In a cohort of 87 malignant gliomas treated with radiotherapy and TMZ-based chemotherapy, we retrospectively determined the MGMT promoter methylation status, genotyped single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the promoter region and quantified MGMT mRNA expression level. Each of these variables was correlated with each other and with the patients' OS. We found that methylation of the CpG sites within MGMT exon 1 best correlated with OS and MGMT expression levels, and confirmed MGMT methylation as a stronger independent prognostic factor compared to MGMT transcription levels. Our main finding is that the presence of only the A allele at the rs34180180 SNP in the tumor was significantly associated with shorter OS, independently of the MGMT methylation status. In conclusion, in the clinic, rs34180180 SNP genotyping could improve the prognostic value of the MGMT promoter methylation assay in patients with aggressive glioma treated with TMZ.

Glioblastoma care in the elderly

Glioblastoma is common among elderly patients, a group in which comorbidities and a poor prognosis raise important considerations when designing neuro-oncologic care. Although the standard of care for nonelderly patients with glioblastoma includes maximal safe surgical resection followed by radiotherapy with concurrent and adjuvant temozolomide, the safety and efficacy of these modalities in elderly patients are less certain given the population's underrepresentation in many clinical trials. The authors reviewed the clinical trial literature for reports on the treatment of elderly patients with glioblastoma to provide evidence-based guidance for practitioners. In elderly patients with glioblastoma, there is a survival advantage for those who undergo maximal safe resection, which likely includes an incremental benefit with increasing completeness of resection. Radiotherapy extends survival in selected patients, and hypofractionation appears to be more tolerable than standard fractionation. In addition, temozolomide chemotherapy is safe and extends the survival of patients with tumors that harbor O(6)-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation. The combination of standard radiation with concurrent and adjuvant temozolomide has not been studied in this population. Although many questions remain unanswered regarding the treatment of glioblastoma in elderly patients, the available evidence provides a framework on which providers may base individual treatment decisions. The importance of tumor biomarkers is increasingly apparent in elderly patients, for whom the therapeutic efficacy of any treatment must be weighed against its potential toxicity. MGMT promoter methylation status has specifically demonstrated utility in predicting the efficacy of temozolomide and should be considered in treatment decisions when possible. Cancer 2016;122:189-197. © 2015 American Cancer Society.

An Innovative Fluorescent Semi-quantitative Methylation-specific PCR Method for the Determination of MGMT Promoter Methylation is Reflecting Intra-tumor Heterogeneity.

High grade gliomas (HGG) are usually associated with a very dismal prognosis, which was moderately improving in the last decade with the introduction of the alkylating agent temozolomide in their treatment. The methylation status of MGMT (O6 methylguanine DNA-methyltransferase) promoter is one of the strongest predictive and prognostic factors for the patient chemoresponse. For instance, the molecular method of assessment for MGMT promoter status is not standardized. In this background, we developed a fluorescent capillary gel electrophoresis-based methylation specific-PCR. This technique allowed a semi-quantitative estimate of the relative ratio between methylated and unmethylated alleles. The efficacy and accuracy of the technique was assessed in a retrospective cohort of 178 newly diagnosed adult HGGs, who were homogeneously treated. First, we analyzed the impact on survival of different cut-off points in the MGMT promoter methylation and, to go further, we correlated these different rates to other well-known prognostic molecular factors involved in adult HGGs. This strategy allowed to validate our technique as a very sensitive technique (detection of a low methylation percentage, < 5%), which was feasible in fresh-frozen as well as in FFPE samples and had the propensity to detect intra-tumor heterogeneity. This technique identified a new sub-group of anaplastic oligodendrogliomas or oligoastrocytomas defined by a minor methylation and a worse outcome and, therefore, will help to substratify accurately into more homogeneous subgroups of methylated tumors.

Long-term therapy with temozolomide is a feasible option for newly diagnosed glioblastoma: a single-institution experience with as many as 101 temozolomide cycles.

The objective of this study was to report the authors' experience with the long-term administration of temozolomide (TMZ; > 6 cycles, up to 101) in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma and to analyze its feasibility and safety as well as its impact on survival. The authors also compared data obtained from the group of patients undergoing long-term TMZ treatment with data from patients treated with a standard TMZ protocol. A retrospective analysis was conducted of 37 patients who underwent operations for glioblastoma between 2004 and 2012. Volumetric analysis of postoperative Gd-enhanced MR images, obtained within 48 hours, confirmed tumor gross-total resection (GTR) in all but 2 patients. All patients received the first cycle of TMZ at a dosage of 150 mg/m(2) starting on the second or third postsurgical day. Afterward, patients received concomitant radiochemotherapy according to the Stupp protocol. With regard to adjuvant TMZ therapy, the 19 patients in Group A, aged 30-72 years (mean 56.1 years), received 150 mg/m(2) for 5 days every 28 days for more than 6 cycles (range 7-101 cycles). The 18 patients in Group B, aged 46-82 years (mean 64.8 years), received the same dose, but for no more than 6 cycles. O(6)-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation status was analyzed for both groups and correlated with overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). The impact of age, sex, Karnofsky Performance Scale score, and Ki 67 staining were also considered. All patients but 1 in Group A survived at least 18 months (range 18-101 months), and patients in Group B survived no more than 17 months (range 2-17 months). The long-term survivors (Group A), defined as patients who survived at least 12 months after diagnosis, were 51.3% of the total (19/37). Kaplan-Meier curve analysis showed that patients treated with more than 6 TMZ cycles had OS and PFS that was significantly longer than patients receiving standard treatment (median OS 28 months vs 8 months, respectively; p = 0.0001; median PFS 20 months vs 4 months, respectively; p = 0.0002). By univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression analysis, MGMT methylation status and number of TMZ cycles appeared to be survival prognostic factors in patients with glioblastoma. After controlling for MGMT status, highly significant differences related to OS and PFS between patients with standard and long-term TMZ treatment were still detected. Furthermore, in Group A and B, the statistical correlation of MGMT status to the number of TMZ cycles showed a significant difference only in Group A patients, suggesting that MGMT promoter methylation was predictive of response for long-term TMZ treatment. Prolonged therapy did not confer hematological toxicity or opportunistic infections in either patient group. This study describes the longest experience so far reported with TMZ in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastomas, with as many as 101 cycles, who were treated using GTR. Statistically significant data confirm that median survival correlates with MGMT promoter methylation status as well as with the number of TMZ cycles administered. Long-term TMZ therapy appears feasible and safe.

MGMT promoter methylation is associated with temozolomide response and prolonged progression-free survival in disseminated cutaneous melanoma.

To investigate the predictive and prognostic value of O(6) -methylguanine DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) inactivation by analyses of promoter methylation in pretreatment tumor biopsies from patients with cutaneous melanoma treated with dacarbazine (DTIC) or temozolomide (TMZ) were performed. The patient cohorts consisted of Belgian and Swedish disseminated melanoma patients. Patients were subdivided into those receiving single-agent treatment with DTIC/TMZ (cohort S, n = 74) and those treated with combination chemotherapy including DTIC/TMZ (cohort C, n = 79). Median follow-up was 248 and 336 days for cohort S and cohort C, respectively. MGMT promoter methylation was assessed by three methods. The methylation-related transcriptional silencing of MGMT mRNA expression was assessed by real-time RT-PCR. Response to chemotherapy and progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival were correlated to MGMT promoter methylation status. MGMT promoter methylation was detected in tumor biopsies from 21.5 % of the patients. MGMT mRNA was found to be significantly lower in tumors positive for MGMT promoter methylation compared to tumors without methylation in both treatment cohorts (p < 0.005). DTIC/TMZ therapy response rate was found to be significantly associated with MGMT promoter methylation in cohort S (p = 0.0005), but did not reach significance in cohort C (p = 0.16). Significantly longer PFS was observed among patients with MGMT promoter-methylated tumors (p = 0.002). Multivariate Cox regression analysis identified presence of MGMT promoter methylation as an independent variable associated with longer PFS. Together, this implies that MGMT promoter methylation is associated with response to single-agent DTIC/TMZ and longer PFS in disseminated cutaneous melanoma.

MGMT testing--the challenges for biomarker-based glioma treatment.

Many patients with malignant gliomas do not respond to alkylating agent chemotherapy. Alkylator resistance of glioma cells is mainly mediated by the DNA repair enzyme O(6)-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT). Epigenetic silencing of the MGMT gene by promoter methylation in glioma cells compromises this DNA repair mechanism and increases chemosensitivity. MGMT promoter methylation is, therefore, a strong prognostic biomarker in paediatric and adult patients with glioblastoma treated with temozolomide. Notably, elderly patients (>65-70 years) with glioblastoma whose tumours lack MGMT promoter methylation derive minimal benefit from such chemotherapy. Thus, MGMT promoter methylation status has become a frequently requested laboratory test in neuro-oncology. This Review presents current data on the prognostic and predictive relevance of MGMT testing, discusses clinical trials that have used MGMT status to select participants, evaluates known issues concerning the molecular testing procedure, and addresses the necessity for molecular-context-dependent interpretation of MGMT test results. Whether MGMT promoter methylation testing should be offered to all individuals with glioblastoma, or only to elderly patients and those in clinical trials, is also discussed. Justifications for withholding alkylating agent chemotherapy in patients with MGMT-unmethylated glioblastomas outside clinical trials, and the potential role for MGMT testing in other gliomas, are also discussed.

Confounding Factors in Diagnostics of MGMT Promoter Methylation Status in Glioblastomas in Stereotactic Biopsies

Background: In nonresectable glioblastoma (GBM), stereotactic biopsies are performed to retrieve tissue for diagnostic purposes. The analysis of O⁶-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation adds prognostic and predictive information. Objectives: The aim of the study was to detect confounding factors that limit the number of conclusive MGMT promoter methylation results. Methods: We analyzed 71 consecutive GBM patients undergoing stereotactic biopsy on whom MGMT analysis was performed by methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction. Specimens were correlated to imaging by coregistration and prospective documentation of biopsy localization. Our findings were validated in an additional 62 GBM stereotactic biopsies. Results: Our results demonstrate that the best MGMT promoter methylation results were obtained from samples (n = 71) taken in a tangential manner from tumor areas showing contrast enhancement in magnetic resonance imaging. In the additional validation series of 62 stereotactically biopsied GBM, we were able to increase the rate of conclusive MGMT promoter methylation results from 76.1 to 85.48% by strictly planning the route of biopsy in a tangential manner if possible. Conclusions: These results underline that within the contrast-enhanced tumor part, choosing the trajectory in a tangential manner increases the diagnostic yield for conclusive MGMT promoter methylation analyses in stereotactic biopsies as a basis for patient stratification and individualized therapy.

The Changes in MGMT Promoter Methylation Status in Initial and Recurrent Glioblastomas

To evaluate the mechanism of the development of therapeutic resistance after temozolomide treatment, we focused on changes in O(6)-methylguanine DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) and mismatch repair (MMR) between initial and recurrent glioblastomas. Tissue samples obtained from 24 paired histologically confirmed initial and recurrent adult glioblastoma patients who were initially treated with temozolomide were used for MGMT and MMR gene promoter methylation status and protein expression analysis using methylation-specific multiplex ligation probe amplification (MS-MLPA), methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction (MSP), and immunohistochemical staining. There was a significant decrease in the methylation ratio of the MGMT promoter determined by MS-MLPA, which was not detectable with MSP, and MGMT protein expression changes were not remarkable. However, there was no epigenetic variability in MMR genes, and a relatively homogeneous expression of MMR proteins was observed in initial and recurrent tumors. We conclude that the development of reduced methylation in the MGMT promoter is one of the mechanisms for acquiring therapeutic resistance after temozolomide treatment in glioblastomas.

Correlation of apparent diffusion coefficient values measured by diffusion MRI and MGMT promoter methylation semiquantitatively analyzed with MS‐MLPA in patients with glioblastoma multiforme

To retrospectively determine whether the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values correlate with O(6)-methylguanine DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation semiquantitatively analyzed by methylation-specific multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MS-MLPA) in patients with glioblastoma. The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board and was Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) compliant. Newly diagnosed patients with glioblastoma (n = 26) were analyzed with an ADC histogram approach based on enhancing solid portion. The methylation status of MGMT promoter was assessed by methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction (MSP) and by MS-MLPA. MS-MLPA is a semiquantitative method that determines the methylation ratio. The Ki-67 labeling index was also analyzed. The mean and 5th percentile ADC values were correlated with MGMT promoter methylation status and Ki-67 labeling index using a linear regression model. Progression-free survival (PFS) was also correlated with the ADC values using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. The mean methylation ratio was 0.21 ± 0.20. By MSP, there were 5 methylated and 21 unmethylated tumors. The mean ADC revealed a positive relationship with MGMT promoter methylation ratio (P = 0.015) and was also significantly different according to MSP-determined methylation status (P = 0.011). Median PFS was significantly related with methylation ratio (P = 0.017) and MSP-derived methylation status (P = 0.025). A positive relationship was demonstrated between PFS and the mean ADC value (P = 0.001). The 5th percentile ADC values showed a significant negative relationship with Ki-67 labeling index (P = 0.036). We found that ADC values were significantly correlated with PFS as well as with MGMT promoter methylation status. We believe that ADC values may merit further investigation as a noninvasive biomarker for predicting treatment response.

Post-transcriptional regulation of O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase MGMT in glioblastomas

The DNA repair enzyme O(6)-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) confers therapeutic resistance to DNA alkylating agents, including temozolomide. It is largely believed that MGMT promoter methylation is associated with down regulation of MGMT transcription and corresponding protein expression, thereby predisposing tumor cells to the toxic effect of temozolomide. Here we rigorously examined this underlying assumption. We examined the correlation between MGMT promoter methylation, transcription, and protein expression using The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) glioblastoma database as well as an independent collection of glioblastoma specimens. In both analyses, we found that MGMT promoter methylation status correlates well with low MGMT mRNA levels (p = 0.04). On the other hand, glioblastomas with unmethylated MGMT promoters exhibited a wide range of MGMT mRNA expression. Intriguingly, the MGMT mRNA levels correlated poorly with MGMT protein levels by Western blotting (R(2) = 0.04, p = 0.34) or by ImmunoHistoChemical (IHC) stain quantitation (R(2) = 0.02, p = 0.50). To exclude the possibility that the poor correlation was due to substandard specimens, we determined the mRNA and protein levels of Colony Stimulating Factor 1 (CSF1), a gene previously shown to exhibit excellent mRNA/protein correlation. In contrast to MGMT, the mRNA level of CSF1 correlated well with the protein level (R(2) = 0.47, p = 0.001). Importantly, long-term passaged glioblastoma cell lines with comparable MGMT transcript levels differed in MGMT protein levels, suggesting mechanisms of post-transcriptional regulation. Accordingly, the correlation between MGMT promoter methylation and MGMT protein expression was poor (p = 0.27). In silico analysis predicted potential binding sites for several miRNA within the 3'UTR of MGMT, suggesting a mechanism for the post-transcriptional of MGMT. Our results suggest mechanisms such as miRNA mediated regulation for post-transcriptional regulation of MGMT. Identification of these mechanisms should enhance the value of MGMT based prognostic or predictive biomarker strategies.