Methylation Status In Cancer Research Articles

Aberrant DNA Methylation of ABC Transporters in Cancer.

ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporters play a crucial role in multidrug resistance (MDR) of cancers. They function as efflux pumps, resulting in limited effectiveness or even failure of therapy. Increasing evidence suggests that ABC transporters are also involved in tumor initiation, progression, and metastasis. Tumors frequently show multiple genetic and epigenetic abnormalities, including changes in histone modification and DNA methylation. Alterations in the DNA methylation status of ABC transporters have been reported for a variety of cancer types. In this review, we outline the current knowledge of DNA methylation of ABC transporters in cancer. We give a brief introduction to structure, function, and gene regulation of ABC transporters that have already been investigated for their DNA methylation status in cancer. After giving an overview of the applied methodologies and the CpGs analyzed, we summarize and discuss the findings on aberrant DNA methylation of ABC transporters by cancer types. We conclude our review with the discussion of the potential to target aberrant DNA methylation of ABC transporters for cancer therapy.

Aberrant Methylation of LINE-1 Transposable Elements: A Search for Cancer Biomarkers.

Cancer remains one of the main causes of human mortality despite significant progress in its diagnostics and therapy achieved in the past decade. Massive hypomethylation of retrotransposons, in particular LINE-1, is considered a hallmark of most malignant transformations as it results in the reactivation of retroelements and subsequent genomic instability. Accumulating data on LINE-1 aberrant methylation in different tumor types indicates its significant role in cancer initiation and progression. However, direct evidence that LINE-1 activation can be used as a cancer biomarker is still limited. The objective of this review was to critically evaluate the published results regarding the diagnostic/prognostic potential of the LINE-1 methylation status in cancer. Our analysis indicates that LINE-1 hypomethylation is a promising candidate biomarker of cancer development, which, however, needs validation in both clinical and laboratory studies to confirm its applicability to different cancer types and/or stages. As LINE-1 is present in multiple cell-free copies in blood, it has advantages over single-copy genes regarding perspectives of using its methylation status as an epigenetic cancer biomarker for cell-free DNA liquid biopsy.

Association of MGMT promoter methylation with tumorigenesis features in patients with ovarian cancer: A systematic meta-analysis.

BackgroundThe MGMT is a key tumor suppressor gene and aberrant promoter methylation has been reported in many cancers. However, the relationship between MGMT promoter methylation and ovarian cancer remains controversial. This meta‐analysis was first conducted to estimate the clinical significance of MGMT promoter methylation in ovarian carcinoma.MethodsLiterature search was performed in the PubMed, Embase, EBSCO and Cochrane Library databases. The pooled odds ratio (OR) and their corresponding 95% confidence interval (95% CI) were summarized.ResultsFinal 10 studies with 910 ovarian tissue samples were included in this meta‐analysis. MGMT promoter methylation was significantly higher in ovarian cancer than in normal ovarian tissues (OR = 4.13, 95% CI = 2.32–7.33, p < .001). The MGMT had a similar methylation status in cancer versus benign lesions and low malignant potential (LMP) samples (OR = 2.01, 95% CI = 0.67–6.04, p = .212; OR = 1.42, 95% CI = 0.46–4.40, p = .543; respectively). MGMT promoter methylation was correlated with pathological types in which it was significantly lower in serous cancer than in nonserous cancer (OR = 0.29, 95% CI = 0.14–0.59, p = .001). The methylation of the MGMT promoter was not associated with clinical stage and tumor grade (OR = 1.46, 95% CI = 0.71–3.02, p = .301; OR = 1.13, 95% CI = 0.51–2.46, p = .767; respectively).Conclusions MGMT promoter methylation may be correlated with the tumorigenesis of ovarian cancer. It was associated with tumor histotypes, but not correlated with clinical stage and tumor grade. More prospective studies with lager sample sizes are necessary in the future.

Immunohistochemical Evaluation of Global DNA Methylation: Comparison with in Vitro Radiolabeled Methyl Incorporation Assay

The in vitro radiolabeled methyl incorporation assay, a commonly used technique to evaluate global methylation of DNA, has some disadvantages and limitations. The purpose of the present study was to compare the results of global DNA methylation evaluated by radiolabeled methyl incorporation (CPM/μg of DNA) with immunohistochemical staining of the same tissue sections with a monoclonal antibody developed against 5-methylcytosine (5-mc). We used archival specimens of squamous cell cancer (SCC) of the human lung with a matched uninvolved specimen (n = 18 pairs) and 18 lung specimens from subjects without lung cancer (noncancer specimens) to make this comparison. The immunostaining for 5-mc was reported as a percentage of cells positive for staining as well as a weighted average of the intensity score. The results suggested that both radiolabeled methyl incorporation assay and immunostaining for 5-mc can be used to demonstrate hypomethylation of DNA in SCC tissues compared to matched uninvolved tissues. An advantage of immunostaining, however, is its ability to demonstrate hypomethylation of SCC compared to adjacent bronchial mucosa on the same archival specimen, obviating the need to use sections from both SCC and matched uninvolved tissues. Only by using the immunostaining technique were we able to document a statistically significant difference in DNA methylation between SCC and noncancer tissues. We conclude that the immunostaining technique has advantages over the radiolabeled methyl incorporation assay and may be best suited for evaluation of global DNA methylation when the methylation status of cancer cannot be normalized by methyl incorporation of normal tissues or when the number of samples available for evaluation is small.