Objective: To evaluate the practicality of constructing multiple evaluation index systems for postgraduates in clinical medicine professional degree based on job competency. Methods: The theoretical framework of the evaluation index system was initially developed using expert consultation, literature review, and other methods. 20 survey experts were selected and consulted using the Delphi method to screen and evaluate the weights of multiple indicators. Data was then entered into a table to evaluate the practicality of the constructed indicators. Results: The questionnaire recovery rate of the first round of expert consultation was 92.50%, and the second round was 100.00%. The comparison between the two groups showed P < 0.05. The authority level of the first round was 0.817, and the second round was 0.811. In the first round of coordination, the chi-square value of the first-level indicators was 0.498, and the chi-square value of the second-level indicators was 0.628. In the second round of coordination, the chi-square value of the first-level indicators was 0.573, and the chi-square value of the second-level indicators was 0.634. The comparison between the two rounds showed P < 0.05. The evaluation index system included 2 first-level indicators, 5 second-level indicators, and 31 third-level indicators. Conclusion: Constructing an evaluation index system based on job competency is highly scientific, with a reasonable construction process and high practical value.
Read full abstract