Metazoan Replication-dependent Histone mRNAs Research Articles

Role of oligouridylation in normal metabolism and regulated degradation of mammalian histone mRNAs.

Metazoan replication-dependent histone mRNAs are the only known cellular mRNAs that are not polyadenylated. Histone mRNAs are present in large amounts only in S-phase cells, and their levels are coordinately regulated with the rate of DNA replication. In mammals, the stemloop at the 3' end of histone mRNA is bound to stemloop binding protein, a protein required for both synthesis and degradation of histone mRNA, and an exonuclease, 3'hExo (ERI1). Histone mRNAs are rapidly degraded when DNA synthesis is inhibited in S-phase cells and at the end of S-phase. Upf1 is also required for rapid degradation of histone mRNA as is the S-phase checkpoint. We report that Smg1 is required for histone mRNA degradation when DNA replication is inhibited, suggesting it is the PI-like kinase that activates Upf1 for histone mRNA degradation. We also show that some mutant Upf1 proteins are recruited to histone mRNAs when DNA replication is inhibited and act as dominant negative factors in histone mRNA degradation. We report that the pathway of rapid histone mRNA degradation when DNA replication is inhibited in S-phase cells that are activating the S-phase checkpoint is similar to the pathway of rapid degradation of histone mRNA at the end of S-phase.This article is part of the theme issue '5' and 3' modifications controlling RNA degradation'.

The C-terminal extension of Lsm4 interacts directly with the 3′ end of the histone mRNP and is required for efficient histone mRNA degradation

Metazoan replication-dependent histone mRNAs are the only known eukaryotic mRNAs that lack a poly(A) tail, ending instead in a conserved stem-loop sequence, which is bound to the stem-loop binding protein (SLBP) on the histone mRNP. Histone mRNAs are rapidly degraded when DNA synthesis is inhibited in S phase in mammalian cells. Rapid degradation of histone mRNAs is initiated by oligouridylation of the 3' end of histone mRNAs and requires the cytoplasmic Lsm1-7 complex, which can bind to the oligo(U) tail. An exonuclease, 3'hExo, forms a ternary complex with SLBP and the stem-loop and is required for the initiation of histone mRNA degradation. The Lsm1-7 complex is also involved in degradation of polyadenylated mRNAs. It binds to the oligo(A) tail remaining after deadenylation, inhibiting translation and recruiting the enzymes required for decapping. Whether the Lsm1-7 complex interacts directly with other components of the mRNP is not known. We report here that the C-terminal extension of Lsm4 interacts directly with the histone mRNP, contacting both SLBP and 3'hExo. Mutants in the C-terminal tail of Lsm4 that prevent SLBP and 3'hExo binding reduce the rate of histone mRNA degradation when DNA synthesis is inhibited.

MRNAs containing the histone 3′ stem–loop are degraded primarily by decapping mediated by oligouridylation of the 3′ end

Metazoan replication-dependent histone mRNAs are only present in S-phase, due partly to changes in their stability. These mRNAs end in a unique stem-loop (SL) that is required for both translation and cell-cycle regulation. Previous studies showed that histone mRNA degradation occurs through both 5'→3' and 3'→5' processes, but the relative contributions are not known. The 3' end of histone mRNA is oligouridylated during its degradation, although it is not known whether this is an essential step. We introduced firefly luciferase reporter mRNAs containing the histone 3' UTR SL (Luc-SL) and either a normal or hDcp2-resistant cap into S-phase HeLa cells. Both mRNAs were translated, and translation initially protected the mRNAs from degradation, but there was a lag of ∼40 min with the uncleavable cap compared to ∼8 min for the normal cap before rapid decay. Knockdown of hDcp2 resulted in a similar longer lag for Luc-SL containing a normal cap, indicating that 5'→3' decay is important in this system. Inhibition of DNA replication with hydroxyurea accelerated the degradation of Luc-SL. Knockdown of terminal uridyltransferase (TUTase) 4 but not TUTase 3 slowed the decay process, but TUTase 4 knockdown had no effect on destabilization of the mRNA by hydroxyurea. Both Luc-SL and its 5' decay intermediates were oligouridylated. Preventing oligouridylation by 3'-deoxyadenosine (cordycepin) addition to the mRNA slowed degradation, in the presence or absence of hydroxyurea, suggesting oligouridylation initiates degradation. The spectrum of oligouridylated fragments suggests the 3'→5' degradation machinery stalls during initial degradation, whereupon reuridylation occurs.

Interaction between FLASH and Lsm11 is essential for histone pre-mRNA processing in vivo in Drosophila

Metazoan replication-dependent histone mRNAs are the only nonpolyadenylated cellular mRNAs. Formation of the histone mRNA 3' end requires the U7 snRNP, which contains Lsm10 and Lsm11, and FLASH, a processing factor that binds Lsm11. Here, we identify sequences in Drosophila FLASH (dFLASH) that bind Drosophila Lsm11 (dLsm11), allow localization of dFLASH to the nucleus and histone locus body (HLB), and participate in histone pre-mRNA processing in vivo. Amino acids 105-154 of dFLASH bind to amino acids 1-78 of dLsm11. A two-amino acid mutation of dLsm11 that prevents dFLASH binding but does not affect localization of U7 snRNP to the HLB cannot rescue the lethality or histone pre-mRNA processing defects resulting from an Lsm11 null mutation. The last 45 amino acids of FLASH are required for efficient localization to the HLB in Drosophila cultured cells. Removing the first 64 amino acids of FLASH has no effect on processing in vivo. Removal of 13 additional amino acids of dFLASH results in a dominant negative protein that binds Lsm11 but inhibits processing of histone pre-mRNA in vivo. Inhibition requires the Lsm11 binding site, suggesting that the mutant dFLASH protein sequesters the U7 snRNP in an inactive complex and that residues between 64 and 77 of dFLASH interact with a factor required for processing. Together, these studies demonstrate that direct interaction between dFLASH and dLsm11 is essential for histone pre-mRNA processing in vivo and for proper development and viability in flies.

TheDrosophilaU7 snRNP proteins Lsm10 and Lsm11 are required for histone pre-mRNA processing and play an essential role in development

Metazoan replication-dependent histone mRNAs are not polyadenylated, and instead terminate in a conserved stem-loop structure generated by an endonucleolytic cleavage of the pre-mRNA involving U7 snRNP. U7 snRNP contains two like-Sm proteins, Lsm10 and Lsm11, which replace SmD1 and SmD2 in the canonical heptameric Sm protein ring that binds spliceosomal snRNAs. Here we show that mutations in either the Drosophila Lsm10 or the Lsm11 gene disrupt normal histone pre-mRNA processing, resulting in production of poly(A)+ histone mRNA as a result of transcriptional read-through to cryptic polyadenylation sites present downstream from each histone gene. This molecular phenotype is indistinguishable from that which we previously described for mutations in U7 snRNA. Lsm10 protein fails to accumulate in Lsm11 mutants, suggesting that a pool of Lsm10-Lsm11 dimers provides precursors for U7 snRNP assembly. Unexpectedly, U7 snRNA was detected in Lsm11 and Lsm1 mutants and could be precipitated with anti-trimethylguanosine antibodies, suggesting that it assembles into a snRNP particle in the absence of Lsm10 and Lsm11. However, this U7 snRNA could not be detected at the histone locus body, suggesting that Lsm10 and Lsm11 are necessary for U7 snRNP localization. In contrast to U7 snRNA null mutants, which are viable, Lsm10 and Lsm11 mutants do not survive to adulthood. Because we cannot detect differences in the histone mRNA phenotype between Lsm10 or Lsm11 and U7 mutants, we propose that the different terminal developmental phenotypes result from the participation of Lsm10 and Lsm11 in an essential function that is distinct from histone pre-mRNA processing and that is independent of U7 snRNA.

A Genome-wide RNA Interference Screen Reveals that Variant Histones Are Necessary for Replication-Dependent Histone Pre-mRNA Processing

Metazoan replication-dependent histone mRNAs are not polyadenylated and instead end in a conserved stem loop that is the cis element responsible for coordinate posttranscriptional regulation of these mRNAs. Using biochemical approaches, only a limited number of factors required for cleavage of histone pre-mRNA have been identified. We therefore performed a genome-wide RNA interference screen in Drosophila cells using a GFP reporter that is expressed only when histone pre-mRNA processing is disrupted. Four of the 24 genes identified encode proteins also necessary for cleavage/polyadenylation, indicating mechanistic conservation in formation of different mRNA 3' ends. We also unexpectedly identified the histone variants H2Av and H3.3A/B. In H2Av mutant cells, U7 snRNP remains active but fails to accumulate at the histone locus, suggesting there is a regulatory pathway that coordinates the production of variant and canonical histones that acts via localization of essential histone pre-mRNA processing factors.

Formation of the 3′ end of histone mRNA: Getting closer to the end

Nearly all eukaryotic mRNAs end with a poly(A) tail that is added to their 3′ end by the ubiquitous cleavage/polyadenylation machinery. The only known exceptions to this rule are metazoan replication-dependent histone mRNAs, which end with a highly conserved stem–loop structure. This distinct 3′ end is generated by specialized 3′ end processing machinery that cleaves histone pre-mRNAs 4–5 nucleotides downstream of the stem–loop and consists of the U7 small nuclear RNP (snRNP) and number of protein factors. Recently, the U7 snRNP has been shown to contain a unique Sm core that differs from that of the spliceosomal snRNPs, and an essential heat labile processing factor has been identified as symplekin. In addition, cross-linking studies have pinpointed CPSF-73 as the endonuclease, which catalyzes the cleavage reaction. Thus, many of the critical components of the 3′ end processing machinery are now identified. Strikingly, this machinery is not as unique as initially thought but contains at least two factors involved in cleavage/polyadenylation, suggesting that the two mechanisms have a common evolutionary origin. The greatest challenge that lies ahead is to determine how all these factors interact with each other to form a catalytically competent processing complex capable of cleaving histone pre-mRNAs.

U7 snRNA mutations in Drosophila block histone pre-mRNA processing and disrupt oogenesis

Metazoan replication-dependent histone mRNAs are not polyadenylated, and instead terminate in a conserved stem-loop structure generated by an endonucleolytic cleavage involving the U7 snRNP, which interacts with histone pre-mRNAs through base-pairing between U7 snRNA and a purine-rich sequence in the pre-mRNA located downstream of the cleavage site. Here we generate null mutations of the single Drosophila U7 gene and demonstrate that U7 snRNA is required in vivo for processing all replication-associated histone pre-mRNAs. Mutation of U7 results in the production of poly A+ histone mRNA in both proliferating and endocycling cells because of read-through to cryptic polyadenylation sites found downstream of each Drosophila histone gene. A similar molecular phenotype also results from mutation of Slbp, which encodes the protein that binds the histone mRNA 3' stem-loop. U7 null mutants develop into sterile males and females, and these females display defects during oogenesis similar to germ line clones of Slbp null cells. In contrast to U7 mutants, Slbp null mutations cause lethality. This may reflect a later onset of the histone pre-mRNA processing defect in U7 mutants compared to Slbp mutants, due to maternal stores of U7 snRNA. A double mutant combination of a viable, hypomorphic Slbp allele and a viable U7 null allele is lethal, and these double mutants express polyadenylated histone mRNAs earlier in development than either single mutant. These data suggest that SLBP and U7 snRNP cooperate in the production of histone mRNA in vivo, and that disruption of histone pre-mRNA processing is detrimental to development.

The stem–loop binding protein stimulates histone translation at an early step in the initiation pathway

Metazoan replication-dependent histone mRNAs do not have a poly(A) tail but end instead in a conserved stem-loop structure. Efficient translation of these mRNAs is dependent on the stem-loop binding protein (SLBP). Here we explore the mechanism by which SLBP stimulates translation in vertebrate cells, using the tethered function assay and analyzing protein-protein interactions. We show for the first time that translational stimulation by SLBP increases during oocyte maturation and that SLBP stimulates translation at the level of initiation. We demonstrate that SLBP can interact directly with subunit h of eIF3 and with Paip1; however, neither of these interactions is sufficient to mediate its effects on translation. We find that Xenopus SLBP1 functions primarily at an early stage in the cap-dependent initiation pathway, targeting small ribosomal subunit recruitment. Analysis of IRES-driven translation in Xenopus oocytes suggests that SLBP activity requires eIF4E. We propose a model in which a novel factor contacts eIF4E bound to the 5' cap and SLBP bound to the 3' end simultaneously, mediating formation of an alternative end-to-end complex.