Metastatic Gastroesophageal Cancer Research Articles

Inconsistencies in the predictive value of PD-L1 in metastatic gastroesophageal cancer

Inconsistencies in the predictive value of PD-L1 in metastatic gastroesophageal cancer

Top Gastric Cancer Articles from 2022 and 2023 to Inform Your Cancer Practice.

The multimodality management of patients with gastroesophageal cancers is rapidly evolving, with the introduction of new therapies against potential molecular targets paving the way to personalized medicine for patients with both resectable and metastatic disease. Over the past 2years, several important studies evaluating these new targeted therapies, as well as minimally invasive surgical approaches to gastric cancer, have been published. This review article summarizes the top studies published in gastric cancer over the past 2years that are fundamentally changing our practice approach to gastric cancer patients. First, the long-term safety and efficacy of laparoscopic distal gastrectomy as compared with open gastrectomy for locally advanced gastric cancer was confirmed with the publication of the 5-year outcomes of the CLASS-01 and KLASS-02 randomized clinical trials. In addition, several important studies of perioperative immunotherapy for patients with resectable gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancers are ongoing, and in 2022, an interim analysis of the DANTE trial and the final results of the GERCOR NEONIPIGA study were reported. Lastly, the KEYNOTE-859 and SPOTLIGHT trials address an unmet need for additional targeted therapies for patients with previously untreated, human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2)-negative, unresectable or metastatic gastroesophageal cancers, incorporating immune checkpoint inhibitors and targeting Claudin-18 isoform 2 (CLDN18.2) with the monoclonal antibody zolbetuximab, respectively. This article summarizes the findings and implications of several important studies published over the past 2years that are fundamentally changing the way we treat patients with gastroesophageal cancer.

Rivoceranib, a VEGFR-2 inhibitor, monotherapy in previously treated patients with advanced or metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer (ANGEL study): an international, randomized, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial

BackgroundRivoceranib is an oral, selective tyrosine kinase inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2. ANGEL (NCT03042611) was a global, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study evaluating rivoceranib as 3rd-line or ≥4th-line therapy in patients with advanced/metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) cancer.MethodsPatients had failed ≥2 lines of chemotherapy and were randomized 2:1 to rivoceranib 700 mg once daily or placebo with best supportive care. Primary endpoint: overall survival (OS) in the intention-to-treat population. Secondary endpoints: progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and disease control rate (DCR) by blinded independent central review (BICR).ResultsIn total, 460 patients (rivoceranib n = 308, placebo n = 152) were enrolled. OS was not statistically different for rivoceranib versus placebo (median 5.78 vs. 5.13 months; hazard ratio [HR] 0.93, 95% CI 0.74–1.15; p = 0.4724). PFS by BICR (median 2.83 vs. 1.77 months; HR 0.58, 95% CI 0.47–0.71; p < 0.0001), ORR (6.5% vs. 1.3%; p = 0.0119), and DCR (40.3 vs. 13.2%; p < 0.0001) were improved with rivoceranib versus placebo. In patients receiving ≥4th-line therapy, OS (median 6.34 vs. 4.73 months; p = 0.0192) and PFS by BICR (median 3.52 vs. 1.71 months; p < 0.0001) were improved with rivoceranib versus placebo. The most common grade ≥ 3 treatment-emergent adverse events with rivoceranib were hypertension (17.9%), anemia (10.4%), aspartate aminotransferase increased (9.4%), asthenia (8.5%), and proteinuria (7.5%).ConclusionsThis study did not meet its primary OS endpoint. Compared to placebo, rivoceranib improved PFS, ORR, and DCR. Rivoceranib also improved OS in a prespecified patient subgroup receiving ≥4th-line therapy.

The distribution of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) expression and the efficacy and safety of treatments in HER2-expressing advanced or metastatic gastroesophageal cancer: A systematic literature review (SLR).

405 Background: HER2 overexpression plays an important role in determining treatment options for patients with gastroesophageal cancer (GEC). HER2 overexpression has historically been defined dichotomously as HER2-positive (HER2+) or HER2-negative. An emerging potentially clinically relevant category is HER2-low, which could be targeted with HER2-directed antibody drug conjugates. However, data on the epidemiology and outcomes associated with HER2-low GEC are limited. Methods: An SLR of PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases was conducted to identify clinical trials, observational studies, and meta-analyses reporting clinical outcomes or distribution of HER2 expression by IHC and ISH in advanced or metastatic (a/m) GEC. Key inclusion criteria were: English language, published between 2013-2023, and sample size ≥100 HER2-expressing patients. HER2+ was defined as IHC score of 3+ or IHC 2+ and ISH+. HER2-low was defined as IHC 1+ or IHC 2+ and ISH-. Weighted averages were calculated for the proportion of patients who were HER2+ and HER2-low to estimate of the proportion of patients in each HER2 expression category. Results were categorized by patient population (all GEC or gastric cancer [GC] only). Results: Of 2,701 non-duplicated records screened, 174 studies met inclusion criteria. Distribution of HER2 expression was reported in 111 studies, 5 of which reported on the frequency of HER2 expression of IHC 1+ and/or IHC 2+ and ISH+. HER2 expression status varied by patient population, with a weighted average of 26.9% for HER2-low and 13.1-16.5% for HER2+ across groups (Table). Different cutoffs for HER2 amplification via ISH also affected the proportion of patients in each HER2 category across studies. Efficacy and safety outcomes were stratified by HER2 status or IHC results in 74 studies. However, only 3 observational studies reported outcomes separately for the HER2-low population, and results were inconclusive. Conclusions: The distribution of HER2 expression in a/m GEC in the identified studies is highly heterogenous, likely due to variability in IHC scoring and patient populations. Few studies with sufficient samples size (≥100 patients with HER2-expression a/mGEC) reported outcomes for HER2-low a/m GEC, and those that were identified were of low quality. The HER2-low a/m GEC population constitutes an unmet need for effective therapy. There is a need for consistent use of a standardized definition of HER2-low in a/mGEC and additional studies to better evaluate treatment options and outcomes for this patient population. [Table: see text]

Phase II study of GEN-001 in combination with avelumab in patients with PD-L1–positive locally advanced, or metastatic gastric cancer (GC) or gastroesophageal junction cancer (GEJC) who have progressed after second-line (2L) and beyond (GEN001-201 study).

368 Background: The relationship between gut microbiota and the response to immune checkpoint inhibitors is likely due to cross-reactivity between microbial and tumor antigens, enhancing dendritic cell (DC) activation, antigen presentation, and inflammatory cytokine production. GEN-001 is a live biotherapeutic product (LBP) consisting of a lyophilized formulation of a strain of Lactococcus lactis. This study is designed to investigate the safety and efficacy of GEN-001 in combination with avelumab (the PD-L1 inhibitor) for patients with PD-L1 positive advanced GC/GEJC. Methods: This is an open-label, single arm, phase II clinical trial for PD-L1 positive (CPS ≥1) patients with unresectable, locally advanced, or metastatic GC/GEJC who have progressed after second-line and beyond. All patients were treated with GEN-001 (9x1011 CFU, administered as oral once daily) in combination with avelumab (800 mg, administered as an intravenous infusion every two weeks) until progressive disease, unacceptable toxicity, death, or withdrawal. Tumor response was assessed every 8 weeks for 6 months and every 12 weeks thereafter. The primary endpoint was objective response (OR); secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and safety. Results: As of August 31, 2023, a total of 42 patients were enrolled. 37 patients have been assessed for response. The confirmed partial response (PR) and unconfirmed PR were achieved by 5 patients and 1 patient respectively, 8 patients have experienced as stable disease (SD). Median PFS and median OS were 1.73 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.67-2.37 months) and 7.9 months (95% [CI]: 6.07-NE months). Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) of any grade occurred in 12 patients (28.6%) and Grade ≥3 TRAEs occurred in 2 patients (4.8%) out of 42 patients. Conclusions: Treatment of patients with GC/GEJC with GEN-001 in combination with avelumab in the ≥ 3L setting showed promising antitumor activities with an overall manageable safety profile. The results from this trial will be updated about its effects on clinical outcome, including survival, safety, and biomarker findings. Clinical trial information: NCT05419362 .

Unveiling proteomic diversity: A quantitative study of antibody drug conjugate and chemotherapy targets in gastroesophageal cancer.

261 Background: Gastroesophageal cancer (GEC), is a significant global health concern with a 5-year relative survival of 7% for metastatic GEC. Standard treatments often include surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation therapy, but their effectiveness can be limited. Chemotherapy is frequently utilized in the treatment of GEC, although no biomarkers for chemotherapy are used in the selection of the chemo agent. There are several well-known biomarkers of resistance and sensitivity for various chemo agents. We used targeted proteomics to quantify protein expression levels of several protein biomarkers associated with chemotherapy efficiency in 125 GEC patients. These include resistance markers for platinum agents (ERCC1), and tubulin inhibitors (TUBB3). It also includes sensitivity markers for irinotecan/topotecan (Topo1), and doxorubicin/etoposide (Topo2A). We also assessed the protein levels of several antibodies-drug conjugate markers (EGFR, Her2, Trop2, FR-alpha, Mesothelin, Axl, CLDN18.2, and Nectin-4). Methods: FFPE tumor tissues from 125 clinical GC patients were microdissected and solubilized for mass spectrometry-based targeted proteomic analysis in our CLIA-certified laboratory. 72 proteins were quantified from 2-3 sections of FFPE tissue. Results: 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU), taxanes, and platinum agents (such as carboplatin) are among the chemotherapy agents that are frequently used to treat GEC. TYMP, a sensitivity marker for 5-FU, was expressed in 32% of GEC cases. ERCC1, a resistance marker for platinum drugs, was expressed at 34%. Additionally, 48% of GEC exhibited TUBB3, a resistance marker for paclitaxel and docetaxel. Topoisomerase 1 (Topo1) is the target for irinotecan or topotecan, and is also the target for some ADCs (e.g. trastuzumab deruxtecan, sacituzumab govitecan etc.). Topo1 was expressed in 92% of GEC with a 10x range (415 - 4195 amol/μg). Another topoisomerase, Topo2A, targetable by etoposide, epirubicin, and doxorubicin, was expressed in 59% of GEC with 19x range (402-7804 amol/μg). ADC targets, such as EGFR (82% detected with 184x range of distribution), Her3 (18%, 4x), AXL (18%,7x), MET (27%, 19x), and Trop2 (50%, 57x) showed a wide range of protein expression. With a 56x range (318 - 17786 amol/μg), Her2 was found in 46% of GEC, of which 12% of GEC had overexpression of Her2 (&gt;740 amol/μg), suggesting that the majority of GEC has low levels of Her2 (318-690 amol/μg), which is potentially targetable by newer anti-Her2 agents. Conclusions: Every cancer is different, and the ability to quantitate simultaneously 72 protein biomarkers from 2-3 FFPE sections provides a wealth of actionable information that, when combined with other multi-omics biomarker data, will help guide clinical treatment or patient stratification for clinical trials.

Survival after Trastuzumab Therapy in Patients with Locally Advanced or Metastatic HER2-Positive Gastric or Gastroesophageal Junction Cancer: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

In the Trastuzumab for Gastric Cancer study, it was found that trastuzumab combined with doublet chemotherapy (fluoropyrimidine and platinum) was the gold-standard treatment for gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma (GEA) that was locally advanced, unresectable, or metastatic (HER2+). We performed a meta-analysis of randomized phase II/III studies testing trastuzumab in combination or alone. This meta-analysis's findings involved 2048 patients in total. The treatment arm and hormone receptor status were used to stratify the combined HR. Overall, the PFS (Random model) HR [0.80] and 95% confidence intervals (CI) [0.68-0.95] were significantly higher for regimens containing trastuzumab, fluoropyrimidine, and platinum compared to regimens containing fluoropyrimidine and platinum. The results of this meta-analysis provide additional support for trastuzumab's use in treating HER2-positive GEA, particularly in cases where the disease lacks a HER2+ receptor.

Sintilimab Plus Chemotherapy for Unresectable Gastric or Gastroesophageal Junction Cancer

Gastric and gastroesophageal junction cancers are diagnosed in more than 1 million people worldwide annually, and few effective treatments are available. Sintilimab, a recombinant human IgG4 monoclonal antibody that binds to programmed cell death 1 (PD-1), in combination with chemotherapy, has demonstrated promising efficacy. To compare overall survival of patients with unresectable locally advanced or metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancers who were treated with sintilimab with chemotherapy vs placebo with chemotherapy. Also compared were a subset of patients with a PD ligand 1 (PD-L1) combined positive score (CPS) of 5 or more (range, 1-100). Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 clinical trial conducted at 62 hospitals in China that enrolled 650 patients with unresectable locally advanced or metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma between January 3, 2019, and August 5, 2020. Final follow-up occurred on June 20, 2021. Patients were randomized 1:1 to either sintilimab (n = 327) or placebo (n = 323) combined with capecitabine and oxaliplatin (the XELOX regimen) every 3 weeks for a maximum of 6 cycles. Maintenance therapy with sintilimab or placebo plus capecitabine continued for up to 2 years. The primary end point was overall survival time from randomization. Of the 650 patients (mean age, 59 years; 483 [74.3%] men), 327 were randomized to sintilimab plus chemotherapy and 323 to placebo plus chemotherapy. Among the randomized patients, 397 (61.1%) had tumors with a PD-L1 CPS of 5 or more; 563 (86.6%) discontinued study treatment and 388 (59.7%) died; 1 patient (<0.1%) was lost to follow-up. Among all randomized patients, sintilimab improved overall survival compared with placebo (median, 15.2 vs 12.3 months; stratified hazard ratio [HR], 0.77 [95% CI, 0.63-0.94]; P = .009). Among patients with a CPS of 5 or more, sintilimab improved overall survival compared with placebo (median, 18.4 vs 12.9 months; HR, 0.66 [95% CI, 0.50-0.86]; P = .002). The most common grade 3 or higher treatment-related adverse events were decreased platelet count (sintilimab, 24.7% vs placebo, 21.3%), decreased neutrophil count (sintilimab, 20.1% vs placebo, 18.8%), and anemia (sintilimab, 12.5% vs placebo, 8.8%). Among patients with unresectable locally advanced or metastatic gastric and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma treated with first-line chemotherapy, sintilimab significantly improved overall survival for all patients and for patients with a CPS of 5 or more compared with placebo. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03745170.

Patient-Reported Outcomes, Tumor Markers, and Survival Outcomes in Advanced GI Cancer

Patient-reported outcomes (PROs), such as quality of life (QOL) and symptoms, are often associated with clinical outcomes in patients with cancer. In practice, oncologists use serum tumor markers (TMs) (ie, carcinoembryonic antigen [CEA] and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 [CA 19-9]) and imaging to monitor clinical outcomes in patients with gastrointestinal cancer. To examine associations of 1-month changes in PROs and TMs with treatment response and survival among patients with gastrointestinal cancer. This cohort study enrolled patients at Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center with at least 1 month follow-up from May 2019 to December 2020. Included patients were beginning first-line systemic therapy, aged 18 years or older, and had been diagnosed with metastatic pancreaticobiliary, colorectal, or gastroesophageal cancer. Data analyses took place from January 2021 to January 2022. PROs were collected, including QOL (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy General [FACT-G]), physical symptoms (Edmonton Symptom Assessment System [ESAS]), and psychological symptoms (Patient Health Questionnaire-4 [PHQ4] total, PHQ4-depression, and PHQ4-anxiety), as well as TMs (CEA and CA 19-9), at the time of chemotherapy initiation and 1 month later. Associations of 1-month changes in PROs and TMs with treatment response (clinical benefit vs disease progression) at first scan, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS), adjusted for baseline values using regression models. This study included 159 patients, with 134 patients (84.3%) evaluable for analysis. Patients had a median (range) age of 64.0 (28.0-84.0) years and 86 (64.2%) were male. One-month PRO changes (FACT-G: OR, 1.07; 95% CI, 1.03-1.11; P = .001; ESAS-total: OR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.94-1.00; P = .02; ESAS-physical: OR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.92-1.00; P = .03; PHQ4-depression: OR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.49-0.92; P = .01) were significantly associated with treatment response, but PHQ4-total or TMs were not. Changes in FACT-G (HR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.95-0.99; P = .003), ESAS-total (HR, 1.03; 95% CI, 1.01-1.05; P = .004), ESAS-physical (HR, 1.03; 95% CI, 1.00-1.05; P = .02), PHQ4-depression (HR, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.01-1.48; P = .04), and CEA (HR, 1.00; 95% CI, 1.001-1.004; P = .001) were associated with PFS, but changes in PHQ4-total or TMs were not. Changes in ESAS-total (HR, 1.03, 95% CI, 1.01-1.06; P = .006) and ESAS-physical (HR, 1.04, 95% CI, 1.01-1.06; P = .015) were associated with OS, but changes in TMs were not associated with OS. These findings suggest that 1-month changes in PROs can be associated with treatment response and survival in patients with advanced gastrointestinal cancer. Notably, 1-month changes in TMs were not consistently associated with these outcomes. These findings highlight the potential for monitoring early changes in PROs to associate with clinical outcomes while underscoring the need to address the QOL and symptom concerns of patients with advanced cancer.

Perioperative immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy for gastric and gastroesophageal junction cancers: a review of current approaches and future perspectives.

Metastatic gastric and gastroesophageal junction cancers have been treated with chemotherapy, but the landscape of cancer treatment is rapidly shifting towards immune-based therapies. As established by the CheckMate 649 and ATTRACTION-4 trials, combination therapy with fluorouracil, platinum, and nivolumab, an immune checkpoint inhibitor, is now recognized as the standard first-line chemotherapy for HER2-negative gastric and gastroesophageal junction cancer. The potential of immune checkpoint inhibitors extends beyond metastatic disease. For locally advanced gastric and gastroesophageal junction cancer, perioperative chemotherapy with gastrectomy has been regarded as the standard of care, especially in Western nations. Besides, the introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors as neoadjuvant and adjuvant treatments is currently underway, indicating a significant paradigm shift in the treatment strategies. This review summarizes the clinical developments and future perspectives of immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy with or without chemotherapy as perioperative treatment for gastric, esophageal, and gastroesophageal junction cancer.

SO-11 Bemarituzumab for treatment of previously untreated advanced and/or metastatic gastric and gastroesophageal cancer (GC): Final analysis of a randomized phase 2 trial (FIGHT)

SO-11 Bemarituzumab for treatment of previously untreated advanced and/or metastatic gastric and gastroesophageal cancer (GC): Final analysis of a randomized phase 2 trial (FIGHT)

Advancing individualized care in advanced gastroesophageal cancers (GEC): A quality improvement initiative.

4051 Background: Biomarkers have become increasingly important in the treatment of metastatic gastroesophageal cancers (mGEC) with new targeted and immune-based therapies relying on biomarkers to identify patients who may benefit from these therapies. Here, we aimed to identify real-world challenges mGEC care teams face in implementing biomarker testing and evidence-based treatment choices. Methods: In July–September 2022, 74 health care professionals (HCPs) who treat mGEC at 3 US community oncology clinics completed surveys assessing practice patterns, challenges, and confidence related to treating mGEC. HCPs (N = 24) participated in interdisciplinary audit and feedback (AF) sessions to examine clinical evidence and develop clinic-specific action plans to address identified gaps. Results: Participating practices reported that ~22% of their practice is dedicated to GEC care. Participants represented the interprofessional GEC care team: medical oncologists (27%), radiation oncologists (1%), surgeons (1%), advanced practice professionals (32%), nurse/nurse navigators (32%), and other HCPs (5%). Providers reported testing for HER2, EGFR, FGFR, NTRK, microsatellite instability, tumor mutational burden, and PD-L1 in ~55-65% of advanced GEC patients. Most providers reported HER2 testing at time of diagnosis (91%) with 18% reporting testing at time of clinical or radiologic progression and 24% when new metastases are detected. Top reported barriers to use of predictive biomarker testing were long turnaround times for tests (32%) and keeping up to-date with current testing recommendations (23%). Top reported challenges in selecting therapies for GEC were keeping up with clinical evidence (35%) and delayed, pending, or unavailable biomarkers at the time of treatment selection (20%). Clinic action plans focused on specific gaps including (1) improved HCP education on guideline-concordant biomarker use (2) improving testing turnaround times, and (3) improving referrals to clinical trials based on biomarker results. The educational intervention increased correct identification of guideline concordant treatment for stage IV esophageal cancer (48% pre- and 72% post-AF) and confidence in use of biomarkers for treatment decision-making for patients with GEC (high/very high in 46% pre- and 72% post-AF). Conclusions: While molecular testing is becoming increasingly critical for mGEC care, HCPs report challenges with testing workflows and difficulty keeping up with developments in clinical data and guidelines. Clinic-specific interventions to improve biomarker workflows and ongoing educational initiatives to keep HCPs informed of the latest evidence-based best practices in biomarkers and associated therapies can address these gaps to improve outcomes for patients with GEC.

The prognostic value of degree of pre- and post-treatment anemia in patients with advanced gastroesophageal cancers.

e16012 Background: Anemia is common in cancer patients and cancer-related anemia has been associated with poorer clinical outcomes in various malignancies. The degree of anemia in patients receiving chemotherapy, as a prognostic factor in gastroesophageal cancers (GE), is not well understood. There have been studies looking at clinical prognostic scores and their efficacy of predicting outcomes, of which the Gustave Roussy Immune (GRIm-Score) has been seen to be most predictive of early death in GE cancers. This study aims to compare hemoglobin (g/L) values before treatment and at multiple longitudinal timepoints during treatment as a prognostic marker of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). It also aims to identify whether various laboratory measures in the GRIm-Score, which includes lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and body mass index (BMI) may hold prognostic value. Methods: A retrospective analysis of 171 patients with advanced GE cancer receiving first-line palliative-intent systemic therapy at the Princess Margaret Cancer Centre in Toronto, Canada from 2011 to 2021 was performed. Laboratory data were longitudinally collected across four time points: pre-chemotherapy, at first restaging scan, at disease progression and at final blood draw at last known follow up. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to assess the association between change in hemoglobin from baseline, adjusted for LDH, NLR and BMI. Results: Mean hemoglobin value decreased with chemotherapy initiation at the first staging time point compared to pre-chemotherapy values by 10.82 g/L (-10.82, CI: -13.57, -8.07, p &lt; 0.001). On univariate analysis, patients with a hemoglobin increase of 10 g/L at their final blood draw compared to pre-chemotherapy decreased their overall risk of death by 8.50% (HR 0.915, CI: 0.843-0.993, p = 0.033) as well as their PFS by 6.90% (HR 0.931, CI: 0.873-0.994, p = 0.031). On multivariable analysis, adjusting for relevant clinical factors including LDH, NLR and BMI, an increase in hemoglobin increase of 10 g/L from baseline to final was associated with better OS (HR 0.893, CI: 0.817-0.977, p = 0.01). On multivariate analysis, an increase in LDH at progression bloodwork compared to baseline levels was associated with poorer OS (HR 1.002, CI: 1.001-1.003, p = 0.026) and an increase in NLR at final blood draw compared to baseline was associated with poorer OS (HR 1.02, CI: 1.012-1.028, p &lt; 0.001). Conclusions: Patients with metastatic GE cancers can develop treatment-associated anemia and this prognosticates a poorer overall survival. Prognostic models incorporating change in hemoglobin, LDH and NLR ratios should be considered in future clinical evaluation of metastatic GE cancers.

Clinical Effect of the C-Reactive Protein to Serum Albumin Ratio in Patients with Metastatic Gastric or Gastroesophageal Junction Cancer Treated with Trifluridine/Tipiracil.

Trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) is an oral anticancer agent used as a third- or later-line treatment for patients with metastatic gastric cancer/gastroesophageal junction cancer (mGC/GEJC). The C-reactive protein-to-serum albumin ratio (CAR) is an inflammation-based prognostic marker in gastric cancer. This retrospective study evaluated CAR's clinical significance as a prognostic factor in 64 patients with mGC/GEJC administered FTD/TPI as a third- or later-line therapy. Patients were categorized into high- and low-CAR groups based on pre-treatment blood data. This study evaluated associations between CAR and overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), clinicopathological features, treatment efficacy, and adverse events. The high-CAR group had significantly worse Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, a higher prevalence of patients administered with a single course of FTD/TPI, and a higher rate of patients not administered chemotherapy after FTD/TPI therapy than the low-CAR group. Median OS and PFS were significantly poorer in the high-CAR group than in the low-CAR group (113 vs. 399 days; p < 0.001 and 39 vs. 112 days; p < 0.001, respectively). In multivariate analysis, high CAR was an independent prognostic factor for OS and PFS. The overall response rate was not significantly different between the high- and low-CAR groups. Regarding adverse events, the high-CAR group had a significantly lower incidence of neutropenia and a higher incidence of fatigue than the low-CAR group. Therefore, CAR may be a potentially useful prognostic factor for patients with mGC/GEJC treated with FTD/TPI as third- or later-line chemotherapy.

Body weight loss as a prognostic and predictive factor in previously treated patients with metastatic gastric cancer: post hoc analyses of the randomized phase III TAGS trial

BackgroundBody weight loss (BWL) is a negative prognostic factor in metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer (mGC/GEJC). In the phase III TAGS study, trifluridine/tipiracil improved survival versus placebo in third- or later-line mGC/GEJC. These retrospective analyses examined the association of early BWL with survival outcomes in TAGS.MethodsEfficacy and safety were assessed in patients who experienced < 3% or ≥ 3% BWL from treatment start until day 1 of cycle 2 (early BWL). The effect of early BWL on overall survival (OS) was assessed by univariate and multivariate analyses.ResultsBody weight data were available for 451 of 507 (89%) patients in TAGS. In the trifluridine/tipiracil and placebo arms, respectively, 74% (224/304) and 65% (95/147) experienced < 3% BWL, whereas 26% (80/304) and 35% (52/147) experienced ≥ 3% BWL at cycle 1 end. Median OS was longer in < 3% BWL versus ≥ 3% BWL subgroups (6.5 vs 4.9 months for trifluridine/tipiracil; 6.0 vs 2.5 months for placebo). In univariate analyses, an unadjusted HR of 0.58 (95% CI, 0.46–0.73) for the < 3% vs ≥ 3% BWL subgroup indicated a strong prognostic effect of early BWL. Multivariate analyses confirmed early BWL as both prognostic (P < 0.0001) and predictive (interaction P = 0.0003) for OS. Similar results were obtained for progression-free survival. Any-cause grade ≥ 3 adverse events were reported in 77% and 82% of trifluridine/tipiracil-treated and 45% and 67% of placebo-treated patients with < 3% and ≥ 3% BWL, respectively.ConclusionsIn TAGS, early BWL was a strong negative prognostic factor for OS in patients with mGC/GEJC receiving third- or later-line treatment.

A plain language summary of the CheckMate 649 study: nivolumab in combination with chemotherapy compared to chemotherapy alone for untreated advanced or metastatic cancer of the stomach or esophagus

This is a summary of the 1-year results of a clinical research study known as CheckMate 649 published in The Lancet in June 2021. The 2-year results on the participants' health and overall quality of life from the same study are in a second publication in Nature in March 2022. Until recently, chemotherapy was the only first treatment option for people with advanced or metastatic gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma who had not been treated before. Patients receiving chemotherapy lived on average for less than 1 year. Nivolumab is an immunotherapy that works by activating a person's immune system to fight back against cancer cells. The goal of CheckMate 649 was to find out if the combination of nivolumab and chemotherapy would help patients with advanced or metastatic gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma live longer and without their cancer getting worse. Results from the final analysis are reported here. Of 1581 people who took part in the study, 789 received nivolumab and chemotherapy and 792 received chemotherapy. Researchers found that, on average, participants who received nivolumab and chemotherapy lived longer overall than those who received chemotherapy alone. The length of time participants lived without their cancer getting worse was also longer on average with nivolumab and chemotherapy than chemotherapy treatment alone. However, more participants in the nivolumab and chemotherapy group had side effects than those in the chemotherapy group. The three most common side effects in both types of treatment were nausea (urge to vomit), diarrhea and peripheral neuropathy. Participants who received nivolumab and chemotherapy had a lower risk of their cancer symptoms worsening and reported that they were 'less bothered' from side effects of treatment than those receiving chemotherapy alone. The nivolumab and chemotherapy combination is considered a new standard treatment option and is approved in several countries as a treatment for adults who have not been treated before for their advanced or metastatic gastroesophageal cancer based on results from CheckMate 649. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT02872116 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

A UK cost-effectiveness analysis of trifluridine/tipiracil for heavily pretreated metastatic gastroesophageal cancers.

Background: The current work was designed to estimate the cost-effectiveness of trifluridine/tipiracil (T/T) versus best supportive care (BSC) for patients with advanced stage or metastatic gastroesophageal cancer (mGC) from a UK perspective. Materials & methods: A partitioned survival analysis was undertaken using data from the phase III TAGS trial. A jointly fitted lognormal model was selected for overall survivaland individual generalized gamma models were chosen for progression-free survival and time-to-treatment-discontinuation. The primary outcome was the cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained. Sensitivity analyses were undertaken to investigate uncertainty. Results: Compared with BSC, T/T was associated with a cost per QALY gained of £37,907. Conclusion: T/T provides a cost-effective treatment option for mGCin the UK setting.

Prognostic Value of Sarcopenia and Metabolic Parameters of 18F-FDG-PET/CT in Patients with Advanced Gastroesophageal Cancer.

We investigated the prognostic value of sarcopenia measurements and metabolic parameters of primary tumors derived from 18F-FDG-PET/CT among patients with primary, metastatic esophageal and gastroesophageal cancer. A total of 128 patients (26 females; 102 males; mean age 63.5 ± 11.7 years; age range: 29-91 years) with advanced metastatic gastroesophageal cancer who underwent 18F-FDG-PET/CT as part of their initial staging between November 2008 and December 2019 were included. Mean and maximum standardized uptake value (SUV) and SUV normalized by lean body mass (SUL) were measured. Skeletal muscle index (SMI) was measured at the level of L3 on the CT component of the 18F-FDG-PET/CT. Sarcopenia was defined as SMI < 34.4 cm2/m2 in women and <45.4 cm2/m2 in men. A total of 60/128 patients (47%) had sarcopenia on baseline 18F-FDG-PET/CT. Mean SMI in patients with sarcopenia was 29.7 cm2/m2 in females and 37.5 cm2/m2 in males. In a univariable analysis, ECOG (<0.001), bone metastases (p = 0.028), SMI (p = 0.0075) and dichotomized sarcopenia score (p = 0.033) were significant prognostic factors for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Age was a poor prognostic factor for OS (p = 0.017). Standard metabolic parameters were not statistically significant in the univariable analysis and thus were not evaluated further. In a multivariable analysis, ECOG (p < 0.001) and bone metastases (p = 0.019) remained significant poor prognostic factors for OS and PFS. The final model demonstrated improved OS and PFS prognostication when combining clinical parameters with imaging-derived sarcopenia measurements but not metabolic tumor parameters. In summary, the combination of clinical parameters and sarcopenia status, but not standard metabolic values from 18F-FDG-PET/CT, may improve survival prognostication in patients with advanced, metastatic gastroesophageal cancer.

The role of claudin 18.2 and HER-2 in pancreatic cancer outcomes.

To examine the prognostic value of claudin 18.2 (CLDN18.2) and human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER-2) expression in patients with resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). This study enrolled patients who underwent surgery and were diagnosed with PDAC at Suleyman Demirel University Hospital, Turkey between 2015 and 2019. Sixty-eight patients with resected PDAC treated at a medical oncology clinic were assessed. All patients were over the age of 18 years, underwent follow-up and treatment in our unit, and had pathology slides that we could access. Clinicopathological data were obtained from medical files, including the patients' age, sex, pathological parameters, and clinical stage according to the Eighth International Union against Cancer/American Joint Committee on Cancer. Patient survival and the period from the date of diagnosis to death were assessed in the follow-up data. There was no statistically significant difference between CLDN18.2 and HER-2 expression scores for samples and patient clinicopathological characteristics. No HER-2 expression scores of ≥2 were found in the samples. Only 25% (n = 17) of the samples had HER-2 expression scores of +1. CLDN18.2 expression was detected in 54.4% (n = 37) of the patient samples. CLDN18.2 expression scores were +1 in 30.8% (n = 21) of the patient samples, +2 in 16.2% (n = 11), and +3 in 7.4% (n = 5). When CLDN18.2 and HER-2 expression were compared, a statistically significant difference and moderate positive correlation were observed. No significant relationship between HER-2 expression and survival was observed in the survival analysis of PDAC patients; however, high CLDN18.2 expression was related to longer overall survival. Our study is the third to research CLDN18.2 expression in PDAC. HER-2 expression is low and CLDN18.2 expression is high in patients with PDAC. HER-2 expression is not related to overall survival but CLDN18.2 is related and may be used as a prognostic marker in patients with PDAC.

Comprehensive biomarker analysis of long-term response to trastuzumab in patients with HER2-positive advanced gastric or gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma

BackgroundA subgroup of patients with HER2-positive metastatic gastric and gastroesophageal junction cancers shows long-term response under trastuzumab maintenance monotherapy. Obviously, HER2 status alone is not able to identify these patients. We performed this study to identify potential new prognostic biomarkers for this long-term responding patient group. Patients and methodsTumour samples of 19 patients with HER2-positive metastatic gastric and gastroesophageal junction cancer who underwent trastuzumab treatment were retrospectively collected from multiple centres. Patients were divided into long-term responding (n = 7) or short-term responding group (n = 12) according to progression-free survival (PFS≥12 months vs. PFS < 12 months). Next-generation sequencing and microarray-based gene expression analysis were performed along with HER2 and PD-L1 immunohistochemistry. ResultsLong-term responding patients had significantly higher PD-L1 combined positive scores (CPS) and CPS correlated with longer progression-free survival. PD-L1 positivity (CPS ≥ 1) was further associated with an increased CD4+ memory T-cell score. The ERBB2 copy number as well as the tumour mutational burden could not discriminate between short-term and long-term responding patients. Genetic alterations and coamplifications in HER2 pathway associated genes such as EGFR, which were connected to trastuzumab resistance, were present in 10% of the patients and equally distributed between the groups. ConclusionThe study highlights the clinical relevance of PD-L1 testing also in the context of trastuzumab treatment and offers a biological rational by demonstrating elevated CD4+ memory T-cells scores in the PD-L1-positive group.