Metastatic Biliary Tract Cancer Research Articles

Evaluating Debio 1347 in Patients with FGFR Fusion-Positive Advanced Solid Tumors from the FUZE Multicenter, Open-Label, Phase II Basket Trial.

This multicenter phase II basket trial investigated the efficacy, safety and pharmacokinetics of Debio 1347, an investigational, oral, highly selective, ATP-competitive, small molecule inhibitor of FGFR1-3, in patients with solid tumors harboring a functional FGFR1-3 fusion. Eligible adults had a previously treated locally advanced (unresectable) or metastatic biliary tract (cohort 1), urothelial (cohort 2) or other histologic cancer type (cohort 3). Debio 1347 was administered at 80 mg once daily, continuously, in 28-day cycles. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints included duration of response, progression-free survival, overall survival, pharmacokinetics, and incidence of adverse events. Between March 22, 2019 and January 8, 2020, 63 patients were enrolled and treated, 30 in cohort 1, four in cohort 2, and 29 in cohort 3. An unplanned preliminary statistical review showed that the efficacy of Debio 1347 was lower than predicted and the trial was terminated. Three of 58 evaluable patients had partial responses, representing an ORR of 5%, with a further 26 (45%) having stable disease (≥6 weeks duration). Grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 22 (35%) of 63 patients, with the most common being hyperphosphatemia (13%) and stomatitis (5%). Two patients (3%) discontinued treatment due to adverse events. Debio 1347 had manageable toxicity; however, the efficacy in patients with tumors harboring FGFR fusions did not support further clinical evaluation in this setting. Our transcriptomic-based analysis characterized in detail the incidence and nature of FGFR fusions across solid tumors.

Durvalumab plus gemcitabine and cisplatin in advanced biliary tract cancer (TOPAZ-1): patient-reported outcomes from a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial

In the ongoing, randomised, double-blind phase 3 TOPAZ-1 study, durvalumab, a PD-L1 inhibitor, plus gemcitabine and cisplatin was associated with significant improvements in overall survival compared with placebo, gemcitabine, and cisplatin in people with advanced biliary tract cancer at the pre-planned intermin analysis. In this paper, we present patient-reported outcomes from TOPAZ-1. In TOPAZ-1 (NCT03875235), participants aged 18 years or older with previously untreated, unresectable, locally advanced, or metastatic biliary tract cancer with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1 and one or more measurable lesions per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST; version 1.1) were randomly assigned (1:1) to the durvalumab group or the placebo group using a computer-generated randomisation scheme. Participants received 1500 mg durvalumab or matched placebo intravenously every 3 weeks (on day 1 of the cycle) for up to eight cycles in combination with 1000 mg/m2 gemcitabine and 25 mg/m2 cisplatin intravenously on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks for up to eight cycles. Thereafter, participants received either durvalumab (1500 mg) or placebo monotherapy intravenously every 4 weeks until disease progression or other discontinuation criteria were met. Randomisation was stratified by disease status (initially unresectable vs recurrent) and primary tumour location (intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma vs extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma vs gallbladder cancer). Patient-reported outcomes were assessed as a secondary outcome in all participants who completed the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer's 30-item Quality of Life of Cancer Patients questionnaire (QLQ-C30) and the 21-item Cholangiocarcinoma and Gallbladder Cancer Quality of Life Module (QLQ-BIL21). We calculated time to deterioration-ie, time from randomisation to an absolute decrease of at least 10 points in a patient-reported outcome that was confirmed at a subsequent visit or the date of death (by any cause) in the absence of deterioration-and adjusted mean change from baseline in patient-reported outcomes. Between April 16, 2019, and Dec 11, 2020, 685 participants were enrolled and randomly assigned, 341 to the durvalumab group and 344 to the placebo group. Overall, 345 (50%) of participants were male and 340 (50%) were female. Data for the QLQ-C30 were available for 318 participants in the durvalumab group and 328 in the placebo group (median follow-up 9·9 months [IQR 6·7 to 14·1]). Data for the QLQ-BIL21 were available for 305 participants in the durvalumab group and 322 in the placebo group (median follow-up 10·2 months [IQR 6·7 to 14·3]). The proportions of participants in both groups who completed questionnaires were high and baseline scores were mostly similar across treatment groups. For global health status or quality of life, functioning, and symptoms, we noted no difference in time to deterioration or adjusted mean changes from baseline were observed between groups. Median time to deterioration of global health status or quality of life was 7·4 months (95% CI 5·6 to 8·9) in the durvalumab group and 6·7 months (5·6 to 7·9) in the placebo group (hazard ratio 0·87 [95% CI 0·69 to 1·12]). The adjusted mean change from baseline was 1·23 (95% CI -0·71 to 3·16) in the durvalumab group and 0·35 (-1·63 to 2·32) in the placebo group. The addition of durvalumab to gemcitabine and cisplatin did not have a detrimental effect on patient-reported outcomes. These results suggest that durvalumab, gemcitabine, and cisplatin is a tolerable treatment regimen in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer. AstraZeneca.

Durvalumab Plus Gemcitabine and Cisplatin Versus Gemcitabine and Cisplatin in Biliary Tract Cancer: a Real-World Retrospective, Multicenter Study.

The TOPAZ-1 phase III trial reported a survival benefit with the anti-programmed cell death ligand 1 (anti-PD-L1) durvalumab in combination with gemcitabine and cisplatin in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC). The present study investigated for the first time the impact on survival of adding durvalumab to cisplatin/gemcitabine compared with cisplatin/gemcitabine in a real-world setting. The analyzed population included patients with unresectable, locally advanced, or metastatic BTC treated with durvalumab in combination with cisplatin/gemcitabine or with cisplatin/gemcitabine alone. The impact of adding durvalumab to chemotherapy in terms of overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) was investigated with univariate and multivariate analysis. Overall, 563 patients were included in the analysis: 213 received cisplatin/gemcitabine alone, 350 received cisplatin/gemcitabine plus durvalumab. At the univariate analysis, the addition of durvalumab was found to have an impact on survival, with a median OS of 14.8 months versus 11.2 months [hazard ratio (HR) 0.63, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.50-0.80, p = 0.0002] in patients who received cisplatin/gemcitabine plus durvalumab compared to those who received cisplatin/gemcitabine alone. At the univariate analysis for PFS, the addition of durvalumab to cisplatin/gemcitabine demonstrated a survival impact, with a median PFS of 8.3 months and 6.0 months (HR 0.57, 95% CI 0.47-0.70, p < 0.0001) in patients who received cisplatin/gemcitabine plus durvalumab and cisplatin/gemcitabine alone, respectively. The multivariate analysis confirmed that adding durvalumab to cisplatin/gemcitabine is an independent prognostic factor for OS and PFS, with patients > 70 years old and those affected by locally advanced disease experiencing the highest survival benefit. Finally, an exploratory analysis of prognostic factors was performed in the cohort of patients who received durvalumab: neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and disease stage were to be independent prognostic factors in terms of OS. The interaction test highlighted NLR ≤ 3, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) = 0, and locally advanced disease as positive predictive factors for OS on cisplatin/gemcitabine plus durvalumab. In line with the results of the TOPAZ-1 trial, adding durvalumab to cisplatin/gemcitabine has been confirmed to confer a survival benefit in terms of OS and PFS in a real-world setting of patients with advanced BTC.

Abstract 5132: Multi-omics analysis uncovers predictive biomarkers for the efficacy and outcomes of immune checkpoint inhibitor in combination with chemotherapy in advanced unresectable biliary tract cancers

Abstract Background: Biliary tract cancer, typically diagnosed at advanced stages with a poor prognosis, has witnessed a glimmer of hope in the progress of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Yet, their limited response rates necessitate the search for effective biomarkers to refine patient selection. Methods: A total of 125 patients with a confirmed histological diagnosis of unresectable advanced or metastatic biliary tract cancers (BTC) who received first-line ICIs in combination with chemotherapy (chemoimmunotherapy) were prospectively enrolled. All baseline samples from 125 patients underwent targeted DNA sequencing, with an additional 62 patients undergoing RNA sequencing, and 85 patients had accessible mIHC data. The associations between molecular characteristics and the response to chemoimmunotherapy, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated. Results: The cohort had a median age of 63 years (range from 34 to 82) and 52.8% (66/125) were male, including 54 with gallbladder cancer, 57 with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, and 14 with extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. The median duration of follow-up was 14.8 months for the entire cohort, with the median PFS and OS of 6.9 months (95%CI: 6.2-7.9) and 11.8 months (95%CI: 10.3-14.8), respectively. The most mutated genes were TP53 (64/125, 51.2%), KRAS (34/125, 27.2%), ERBB2 (18/125, 14.4%), and ARID1A (17/125, 13.6%). Mutations of TP53 (51.2%, p = 0.042), BRCA2 (4.8%, p = 0.002), cytokine genes (6.4%, p = 0.004), and high tumor mutation burden (p = 0.072) demonstrated significant correlation with chemoimmunotherapy response. KRAS G12D mutations (PFS: P &amp;lt; 0.001; OS: P = 0.034) and ARID1A loss-of-function mutations (PFS: P = 0.009; OS: P = 0.012) were adverse survival factors, while high CXCL9 or CTLA4 expression was associated with response (CXCL9, P = 0.014; CTLA4, P = 0.067), improved PFS (CXCL9, P = 0.018; CTLA4, P = 0.008), and longer OS (CXCL9, P = 0.010; CTLA4, P = 0.008) under chemoimmunotherapy. Patients were classified into three subtypes using the identified survival biomarkers. Among them, Type I patients, characterized by the absence of KRAS G12D or ARID1A mutations but expressing high levels of CTLA4 or CXCL9, demonstrated the best outcomes under chemoimmunotherapy. Interestingly, further RNA analysis suggested that elevated CXCL9 expression correlated with heightened immune checkpoint expressions, including CTLA4, PD-L1, and PD-1 (all P &amp;lt; 0.001), as well as increased tumor microenvironment immune activity, findings validated in two additional independent patient cohorts both internal and external. Conclusions: Our study revealed predictive biomarkers relevant to the response and efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in combination with chemotherapy in advanced biliary tract cancer. Citation Format: Jieer Ying, Qi Xu, Jiaojiao Ni, Hanlin Chen, Chaoqun Li, Yanru Xie, Qinhong Zheng, Jianying Jin, Junrong Yan, Xiaoying Wu, Qiuxiang Ou, Li Yuan, Wei Zhuo, Haimeng Tang. Multi-omics analysis uncovers predictive biomarkers for the efficacy and outcomes of immune checkpoint inhibitor in combination with chemotherapy in advanced unresectable biliary tract cancers [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(6_Suppl):Abstract nr 5132.

The role of molecular diagnostics in the choice of therapy for biliary tract cancers

The aim of the study was to assess the frequency and clinical significance of various molecular genetic aberrations in biliary tract tumors and to determine the optimal methods of their testing. Material and Methods. We searched the literature sources containing information on predictive molecular markers relevant for the choice of therapy in biliary tract tumors in PubMed and eLibrary databases for the period from 2010 to 2023. data from 60 studies were included in this review. Results. Biliary tract tumors are characterized by poor prognosis and low sensitivity to major systemic therapies. Nevertheless, the emergence of new targeting drugs and prescription of therapy based on the results of molecular genetic analysis can increase the life expectancy and improve the quality of life of a significant proportion of patients. The most frequently detected clinically significant abnormalities in all biliary tract tumors include HER2 gene amplification/hyperexpression (5–20 % of cases), microsatellite instability (1–2 % of cases), BRAF V600E oncogene mutation (1–2 % of cases) and KRAS G12C oncogene mutation (about 1 % of cases). Specific targetable abnormalities unique to intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas include aberrations in the gene encoding fibroblast growth factor receptor 2, FGFR2 (10–20 % of cases) and mutations in the gene encoding the enzyme isocitrate dehydrogenase 1, IDH1 (5–30 % of cases). Very rare clinically significant molecular markers for biliary tract tumors include translocations involving the receptor tyrosine kinase genes NTRK1-3, RET, ALK and ROS1. Mutations in the genes of the dNA double-strand break repair system by the mechanism of homologous recombination are also potentially significant for the choice of therapy. First of all, these are BRCA1/2 genes, hereditary mutations in which, according to two studies, are characteristic of 5–7 % of patients with biliary cancer. Although a significant part of the above-mentioned disorders can be detected by traditional molecular biological approaches such as PCR, IHC, FISH and Sanger sequencing, a comprehensive analysis of all molecular markers of predictive value in biliary tract tumors is difficult to perform without the help of next-generation sequencing (NGS). Conclusion. To improve treatment outcomes of patients with advanced and metastatic biliary tract cancer by individualizing drug therapy, it is necessary to perform comprehensive molecular genetic analysis of tumour tissue.

Clinical outcomes for previously treated patients with advanced biliary tract cancer: a meta-analysis.

Aim: A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed to evaluate the efficacy of treatments for previously treated advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC) patients. Materials & methods: Databases were searched for studies evaluating treatments for advanced (unresectable and/or metastatic) BTC patients who progressed on prior therapy. Pooled estimates of objective response rate (ORR), median overall survival (OS)and median progression-free survival(PFS)were calculated using random effects meta-analysis. Results: Across 31 studies evaluating chemotherapy or targeted treatment regimens in an unselected advanced BTC patient population, pooled ORR was 6.9%, median OS was 6.6monthsand median PFS was 3.2months. Conclusion: The efficacy of conventional treatments for previously treated advanced BTC patients is poor and could be improved by novel therapies.

Differences in receipt of guideline-compliant care and survival for early-onset versus average-onset biliary tract cancers

BackgroundWe examined differences in receipt of guideline-compliant care in patients with early-onset versus average-onset biliary tract cancers (BTC) in localized or metastatic settings. Additionally, we examined associations between guideline compliance and overall survival (OS), stratified by age of onset and clinical stage. MethodsPatients with BTC [intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, gallbladder adenocarcinoma, extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma] were identified within the National Cancer Database (2010–2018). Early onset was defined as diagnosis at < 50 and average onset at ≥ 70 years. Guideline-compliant care was defined as surgical resection ± chemotherapy for localized disease and multi-agent chemotherapy for metastatic disease. ResultsA total of 32,247 patients were identified, of whom 2855 patients (8.9%) had early-onset disease. Early-onset patients were more likely to have metastatic disease at presentation. Early-onset patients were more likely to receive guideline-compliant care in both localized (OR=2.24, 95% CI: 1.93–2.60) and metastatic (OR=4.40, 95% CI: 3.72–5.21) settings. Among patients with localized BTC, guideline compliance was associated with improved OS in both early (median OS: 51.9 vs. 13.5 months; HR=0.31, 95% CI: 0.27–0.37) and average-onset (median OS: 25.9 vs. 6.1 months; HR=0.31, 95% CI: 0.30–0.32) disease. Among patients with metastatic BTC, guideline compliance was associated with improved OS in both early (median OS: 10.1 vs. 3.5 months; HR=0.52, 95% CI: 0.43–0.62) and average-onset (median OS: 8.6 vs. 2.2 months; HR=0.45, 95% CI: 0.43–0.48) disease. ConclusionsEarly-onset BTC is associated with more frequent guideline-compliant care regardless of clinical stage. Guideline compliance is associated with improved OS regardless of age of onset or clinical stage.

A phase 2, open-label, safety and efficacy study of telotristat ethyl plus first-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer.

472 Background: Patients (pts) with unresectable biliary tract cancer (BTC) have a poor prognosis. In preclinical models of cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) telotristat ethyl (TE), a tryptophan hydroxylase inhibitor that reduces production of serotonin, enhanced the antiproliferative effects of gemcitabine and cisplatin (GC) chemotherapy. This trial assessed the safety and efficacy of adding TE to GC chemotherapy in pts with advanced BTC. Methods: This was a Phase 2 open-label study. Eligible pts had unresectable, locally advanced, or metastatic BTC, were treatment naïve and had plans to initiate GC chemotherapy. On Day 1, pts received Gem 1000mg/m2 and Cis 25mg/m2 with TE 250 mg orally three times daily (TID) for 7 days. Thereafter, pts received TE 500 mg TID continuously plus GC therapy on days 1 and 8 of each 21-day cycle. The study comprised of 2 stages: stage 1 would enroll 20 patients with a safety run-in cohort in the first 6 pts to monitor safety and tolerability of TE + GC treatment for 21 days. Stage 2 would enroll 33 patients if no significant/unresolved grade 3 or higher toxicities related to study drug occurred in stage 1. The primary endpoint was 6-month (mo) progression free survival (PFS) rate according to RECIST 1.1. If 60% of pts (≥34) in the safety population were alive and progression free at 6-mos, the study was considered successful. Secondary endpoints included overall response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR). Restaging occurred every 9 weeks using RECIST 1.1 and toxicities were graded using CTCAE v 5.0. Results: Between 2019 and 2021, fifty-three pts were enrolled across 12 study sites and comprised the safety population. The majority of pts were female (62.3%) and median age was 66 yrs (range 33 to 79). Baseline mean plasma 5-HIAA was 11.1 µg/L (ULN defined as &gt;10.8 µg/L). Thirty-one pts (58.5%) had plasma 5-HIAA levels ≤ULN and 22/53 (41.5%) had 5-HIAA levels &gt;ULN. Majority of pts had metastatic BTC (85%) and liver was the most common primary tumor site (66%). The 6-month PFS rate was 22.6% (12/53). Based on blinded independent central review, the ORR was 13.2% and DCR was 62.3%. Mean reduction in plasma 5-HIAA at 6 mos was -1.735 µg/L (SD 8.69) in 24 patients with available data. There was no difference in 6-mo PFS rate based on pts baseline 5-HIAA status; 58% (14/24) pts had ≥30% decrease from baseline in 5-HIAA, however there was no correlation with 6-month PFS. The most common TE related TEAEs were constipation (43.4%), nausea (28.3%) and fatigue (28.3%). Conclusions: The study did not achieve its primary endpoint of 60% of patients on TE plus GC chemotherapy being alive and progression free at 6 months. TE did reduce 5-HIAA levels in a subset of pts; however, this did not correlate to improved clinical outcomes. No significant safety issues noted with TE in combination with GC chemotherapy. Clinical trial information: NCT03790111 .

The interim analysis of a single-arm, open-label, phase II study investigating ALLEN regimen (durvalumab plus albumin paclitaxel and lenvatinib) in patients with unresectable biliary tract cancers (BTCs).

504 Background: BTCs are a heterogeneous group of malignancies with a poor prognosis. Despite the improved outcome achieved by the addition of the anti-PD-L1 antibody durvalumab to standard chemotherapy, the benefits were modest and cannot satisfy the clinical demands adequately. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the combination therapy of Albumin paclitaxel, Durvalumab and Lenvatinib (ALLEN regimen) in unresectable BTCs. Methods: This single-arm, single-center, open-label, phase I/Ⅱ study enrolled patients with locally advanced or metastatic BTCs. Eligible patients with ECOG score 0-2 were treated with ALLEN regimen. Durvalumab (1000mg IV, q3w) in combination with albumin paclitaxel (180-220 mg/m2 IV q3w) and lenvatinib (8mg PO QD) were given regularly until disease progression. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) evaluated by investigators according to RECIST 1.1. The secondary endpoints were disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS) and treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs). Results: From September 2021 to September 2023, fourteen patients were enrolled including three patients who were failed to prior anti-PD-1 antibody treatment. The median follow-up was 6.8 months (95% CI 1.9, 10.9). The median age of the patients was 59.0 years, and male patients accounted for 35.7%. The ORR and DCR were 35.7% and 100%, respectively. The median PFS was 7.3 months (95% CI 4.9, 8.2). TRAEs of any grade occurred in 13 (92.9%) patients without grade 3 or higher. The most common TRAEs were alopecia (13/14, 92.9%), peripheral sensory neuropathy (10/14, 71.4%), decreased appetite and nausea (9/14, 64.3%), hypertension (6/14, 42.9%), rash (5/14, 35.7%), diarrhoea (4/14, 28.6%), and asthenia (4/14, 28.6%). Conclusions: The ALLEN regimen demonstrated encouraging anti-tumor activity with a tolerable safety profile in unresectable BTCs. The preliminary results were promising, which deserved further investigation in a larger population. Clinical trial information: NCT05327582 .

Zanidatamab (zani) in previously treated HER2+ biliary tract cancer (BTC): Impact on patient-reported pain outcomes in the phase 2b HERIZON-BTC-01 study.

450 Background: The HER2 bispecific antibody zani showed rapid, durable responses and a manageable safety profile in patients with HER2+ BTC in the pivotal HERIZON-BTC-01 study. Here we report pain outcomes and opioid use for patients in this trial. Methods: HERIZON-BTC-01 (NCT04466891), an ongoing, open-label, Phase 2b study, is assessing zani (20 mg/kg IV Q2W) in patients with HER2+ (gene amplification and immunohistochemistry 2+ or 3+ [Cohort 1] and 0 or 1+ [Cohort 2]), locally advanced, unresectable or metastatic BTC (gallbladder cancer, intra-/extra-hepatic cholangiocarcinoma) who received prior gemcitabine-containing treatment (tx). Exploratory endpoints assessed at baseline (BL) and every 8 weeks included the Brief Pain Inventory short form, the visual analog scale (VAS), and analgesic opioid use. Results: Of the 80 patients with HER2+ BTC in Cohort 1 who were assessed for primary efficacy (median age 64 yrs; 56% female), 1 (1%) had complete response (CR), 32 (40%) partial response (PR), 22 (28%) stable disease (SD), and 24 (30%) progressive disease (PD); 1 patient was not evaluable. Responders (CR or PR) generally reported improved pain scores and less pain interference with activities of daily living. Patients with PD generally had worsening pain scores and pain interference by time of best on tx score (BONT) (Table). Overall, patients who responded to zani reported improved quality of life (VAS scores) vs BL. Fewer patients with CR (0.0%; n=1) and PR (3.1%; n=32) increased opioid use overall post-BL vs patients with SD (9.1%; n=22) or PD (34.8%; n=23). Conclusions: Patients with HER2+ BTC who responded to zani reported less pain and pain interference compared with BL, further supporting the development of zani as a tx option for these patients, with the goal of improving patient outcomes. Clinical trial information: NCT04466891 . [Table: see text]

PD-L1 as a predictor of chemo-immunotherapy response in biliary tract cancers: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

541 Background: Advanced biliary tract cancers (BTCs) are rare and aggressive malignancies with limited treatment options. Recently, immune checkpoint inhibitors in combination with chemotherapy (ICI-C) gained approval as first-line therapy for unresectable or metastatic BTCs. Two large phase III clinical trials of ICI-C in BTCs did not show a significant correlation between PD-L1 expression and therapeutic response. However, in a phase II study of single-agent nivolumab, there was an association. In light of these conflicting findings, we conducted a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials investigating ICI-C in BTCs to assess whether PD-L1 expression could predict treatment response. Methods: We searched PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases to identify relevant studies. Patient characteristics, method of PD-L1 assessment, and measures of treatment response including hazard ratio (HR), objective response rate (ORR), progression-free-survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were extracted. Pooled ORR and HR were calculated using random effect model and assessed for study heterogeneity. Results: Among the 4,882 studies screened, seven clinical trials evaluating the efficacy of ICI-C in BTCs were identified. Of these trials, two randomized phase III trials report HR between PD-L1 positive and negative patients, while five phase II clinical trials reported ORR based on PD-L1 expression. Out of the 1,069 patients included in these trials, 954 underwent assessment for PD-L1 expression. 66.4% (n=634) exhibited PD-L1 expression level ≥ 1% as determined by either tumor proportion score (TPS) or combined positive score (CPS), while 33.5% (n=320) were classified as PD-L1 negative. Notably, 115 patients were not tested for PD-L1 expression, a variety of PD-L1 assays were used across the studies, and only some studies reported multiple PD-L1 cutoffs. Pooled analysis of two-phase III trials demonstrated that PD-L1 expression ≥ 1% was associated with improved OS (pooled HR 0.83, 95% CI 0.72-0.95) compared to PD-L1 &lt; 1% (pooled HR 0.85, 95% CI 0.67-1.07). Additionally, pooled ORR from five phase II studies showed a trend towards an improved response in patients with PD-L1 expression ≥ 1% (pooled ORR 64%, 95% CI 52-74%) compared to PD-L1 &lt;1% (pooled ORR 46%, 95% CI 31-62%) with a subgroup difference p-value of 0.08. Conclusions: This meta-analysis suggests that BTCs patients with PD-L1 expression ≥ 1% may exhibit a more favorable response to chemo-immunotherapy, and that a majority of BTCs have this level of expression. These findings support further investigation of the use of PD-L1 as a biomarker, and in particular investigation of different PD-L1 levels, which may inform treatment for patients with relative contraindications to immunotherapy use.

Epidemiology, treatment patterns, and humanistic and economic burden of biliary tract carcinoma: A systematic and targeted literature review.

443 Background: Patients with biliary tract cancers (BTC) are typically diagnosed at late stage, with limited treatment options. As such, BTC is associated with poor prognosis, high economic burden and reduced health-related quality of life (HRQoL). As the treatment paradigm is evolving, with multiple immunotherapies showing promise, this study aimed to assess the current disease and treatment landscape. Methods: Systematic literature reviews (Embase, MEDLINE, Cochrane, NHS-EED; database inception to Feb 10, 2023) were conducted for HRQoL and economic burden. Targeted literature reviews (Embase, MEDLINE) were conducted for epidemiology (Jan 01 2017–Feb 06 2023) and treatment guidelines/patterns (Jan 01 2012–Feb 06 2023). Conference abstracts were also searched (2019–2022). Eligibility criteria included global studies (English language) in adults with metastatic and/or unresectable BTC. Results: Overall, 264 studies were included (epidemiology=170, treatment guidelines=14, treatment patterns=50, HRQoL=12, economic burden=18). In the US, Europe and Asia, age-standardized incidence rates were 5.04, 8.39–8.78 and 9.1–10.1 (per 100,000 person-years) and prevalence rates were 0.01%, 0.02–0.34% and 0.02–2.61%, respectively. Treatment pattern studies were mainly from Asia, Europe (n=19 each) and North America (n=10). Gemcitabine [gem]-based chemotherapy was most common in 1L BTC (24–100%) and fluorouracil-based regimens were common in 2L+ BTC (12.3–74.3%). Median overall survival (mOS) for gem-based and fluorouracil-based 1L regimens were 7.7–14.8 months and 7–16.7 months, respectively. Disease progression/toxicity frequently led to treatment discontinuation/dose modifications. In the US, use of non-guideline-based regimens increased by line of therapy (LOT). Among the clinical studies (n=5) reporting HRQoL in 1L, n=4 assessed gem-based combinations. BTC impaired HRQoL domains for anxiety, tiredness (EORTC QLQ-BIL21), work productivity, activity impairment (WPAI scale) and depression (PHQ-9). BTC was associated with substantial economic burden. Mean total all-cause healthcare costs per patient per month (PPPM) increased by LOT (US; 1L: $19,589–25,517, 2L: $22,617–29,721, 3L: $23,256–33,534). US healthcare resource utilization in 1L was driven by outpatient visits (98%), emergency department visits (33–80%) and hospitalization (70–80%). Mean hospital stay ranged from 0.6–7 days PPPM. Conclusions: Epidemiology data varied between Western and Asian populations, but gem-based chemotherapy was identified as the standard of care across regions. There is high unmet need in advanced BTC, as existing options are characterized by poor survival outcomes and considerable economic burden. These findings indicate a need for novel approaches for the management of BTC.

A phase II study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of anlotinib combined with toripalimab for advanced biliary tract cancer.

To assess the safety and efficacy of anlotinib (a multi-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor) combined with toripalimab (a PD-1 monoclonal antibody) in the treatment of unresectable biliary tract cancer (BTC). In this prospective, single-arm, single-centre exploratory clinical study, patients with locally progressed or metastatic BTC were included. Patients were treated with anlotinib (12 mg, PO, QD, for 2 weeks and then stopped for a week, 21 days for a cycle) and toripalimab (240 mg, IV, Q3W). The primary endpoint of the study was the objective response rate (ORR), as defined in RECIST version 1.1 criteria. In this study, 15 BTC patients who met the criteria were enrolled. The ORR was 26.7%, the median progression-free survival (mPFS) was 8.6 months (95% CI: 2.1-15.2), the median overall survival (mOS) was 14.53 months (95% CI: 0.8-28.2) and the disease control rate (DCR) was 87.6%. A patient with hilar cholangiocarcinoma was successfully converted after three cycles of treatment and underwent surgical resection. Furthermore, patient gene sequencing revealed that STK11 was mutated more frequently in patients with poor outcomes. In addition, patients with a CD8/Foxp3 ratio > 3 had a longer survival than those with a CD8/Foxp3 ratio ≤ 3 (P = 0.0397). In patients with advanced BTC, the combination of anlotinib and toripalimab demonstrated remarkable anti-tumor potential, with increased objective response rates (ORR), longer overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Moreover, STK11 and CD8/Foxp3 may be as biomarkers that can predict theeffectiveness of targeted therapy in combination with immunotherapy.

P57-1 Real-world treatment outcomes of metastatic biliary tract cancer in Japan: Tokushukai REAl-world Data project; TREAD 04

P57-1 Real-world treatment outcomes of metastatic biliary tract cancer in Japan: Tokushukai REAl-world Data project; TREAD 04

Real-world treatment outcomes of metastatic biliary tract cancer patients in Japan: the Tokushukai REAl-world data project 04 (TREAD 04).

To investigate temporal trends in treatment patterns and prognostic factors for overall survival in patients with metastatic biliary tract cancer. From the Tokushukai REAl-world Data project, we identified 945 patients with metastatic biliary tract cancer treated with gemcitabine, tegafur/gimeracil/oteracil, gemcitabine plus cisplatin, gemcitabine plus tegafur/gimeracil/oteracil or gemcitabine plus cisplatin and tegafur/gimeracil/oteracil between April 2010 and March 2022. Stratified/conventional Cox regression analyses were conducted to examine the association between overall survival and patient- and tumour-related factors, study period, hospital volume, hospital type and first-line chemotherapy regimen. Using inverse probability of treatment weighting with propensity scores, overall survival was also compared between monotherapy and combination therapy groups. We enrolled 366 patients (199 men; median age, 72years). Over a median follow-up of 5.2months, the median overall survival was 7.0months (95% confidence interval 6.2-9.0), and the median time to treatment failure was 3.5months (95% confidence interval 3.1-4.5). Median overall survival and time to treatment failure for gemcitabine/tegafur-gimeracil-oteracil/gemcitabine plus cisplatin/gemcitabine plus tegafur-gimeracil-oteracil/gemcitabine plus cisplatin and tegafur-gimeracil-oteracil regimen were 6.2/6.6/7.9/16.2/15.1 and 2.8/3.4/4.1/15.3/7.4months, respectively. Primary disease site, previous surgery, previous endoscopic procedures and hospital type were identified as significant prognostic factors. Inverse probability of treatment weighting analysis demonstrated that combination therapy had a significantly better prognosis than monotherapy (hazard ratio 0.61, 95% confidence interval 0.43-0.88, P=0.006). Our real-world data analysis showed that standard care for metastatic biliary tract cancer is widely used in hospitals throughout Japan and verified the survival benefits of combination therapy over monotherapy observed in prior clinical trials. UMIN000050590 (http://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/index.htm).

A Systematised Literature Review of Real-World Treatment Patterns and Outcomes in Unresectable Advanced or Metastatic Biliary Tract Cancer.

Biliary tract cancers are rare aggressive malignancies typically diagnosed when the disease is metastatic or unresectable, precluding curative treatment. We aimed to identify treatment guidelines, real-world treatment patterns, and outcomes for unresectable advanced or metastatic biliary tract cancers in adult patients. Databases (MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews) were systematically searched between 1 January, 2000 and 25 November, 2021, and supplemented by hand searches. Eligible records were (1) treatment guidelines and (2) observational studies reporting real-world treatment outcomes, for unresectable advanced or metastatic biliary tract cancers. Only studies performed in the UK, Germany, France, Australia, Canada and South Korea were extracted, to moderate the number of records for synthesis while maintaining representation of a wide range of biliary tract cancer incidences. A total of 66 relevant unique full-text records were extracted, including 16 treatment guidelines and 50 observational studies. Among guidelines, chemotherapies were most strongly recommended at first line (1L); the combination of gemcitabine and cisplatin (GEMCIS) was recommended as the standard of care in 1L. Recommendations for systemic chemotherapy in the second line (2L) conflicted because of uncertainties around survival benefit. Guidelines on further lines of treatment included a range of locoregional modalities and stenting or best supportive care without providing clear recommendations because of data paucity. Fifty observational studies reporting real-world treatment outcomes were extracted, of which 25 (50%) and 9 (18%) reported outcomes in 1L and 2L, respectively; 22 (44%) reported outcomes for treatments described as 'palliative'. In 1L, outcomes for systemic chemotherapy were most frequently described (23/25 studies), and GEMCIS was the most common systemic chemotherapy used (10/23 studies) in line with guidelines. Median overall survival with 1L systemic chemotherapy was <12 months in most studies (16/23; range 4.7-22.3 months). Most 2L studies (10/11) described outcomes for systemic chemotherapy, most commonly for fluoropyrimidine-based regimen (5/10 studies). Median overall survival with 2L systemic chemotherapy was <12 months in 5/10 studies (range 4.9-21.5 months). Median progression-free survival was reported more rarely than median overall survival. Some studies with small sample sizes or specifically selected patient populations (e.g. higher performance status, or patients who had already responded to treatment) achieved higher median overall survival. At the time of this review, treatment options for unresectable advanced or metastatic biliary tract cancers confer poor real-world survival. For over a decade, GEMCIS remained the 1L standard of care, highlighting the lack of therapeutic innovation in this indication and the urgent unmet need for novel treatments with improved outcomes in this aggressive condition. Additional observational studies are needed to further understand the effectiveness of currently available treatments, as well as newly available therapies including the addition of immunotherapy in the evolving treatment landscape.

Response to programmed cell death protein 1 antibody in patients with Epstein–Barr virus-associated intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

AimEpstein–Barr virus-associated intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (EBVaICC) has a distinct genomic profile and increased CD3+ and CD8+ T cells infiltration. However, the efficacy of immunotherapy in EBVaICC remains largely unknown. This study aimed to assess the efficacy of programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) antibody therapy in EBVaICC. MethodsPatients with metastatic biliary tract cancer (BTC) diagnosed at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center from January 2016 to December 2021 were identified. In situ hybridisation was performed to detect EBV. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were measured. ResultsA total of 698 patients with metastatic BTC were identified, of whom 39 (5.6%) had EBVaICC. Among the 136 patients who were not administered PD-1 antibody, the OS was similar between patients with EBVaICC and EBV-negative ICC (median OS 12.5 versus 9.5 months, respectively; P = 0.692). For the 205 patients who were administered PD-1 antibody, patients with EBVaICC had significantly longer OS than patients with EBV-negative ICC (median OS 24.9 versus 11.9 months, respectively; P = 0.004). Seventeen patients with EBVaICC were administered PD-1 antibody. Eight patients (47%) achieved a partial response, and 17 patients achieved disease control. The median PFS was 17.5 months. ConclusionsThis study identified a clinically actionable subset of patients with EBVaICC with a promising response to the PD-1 antibody.

An age-group analysis on the efficacy of chemotherapy in older adult patients with metastatic biliary tract cancer: a Japanese cancer registry cohort study

BackgroundThe effectiveness of chemotherapy in older adult patients with biliary tract cancer (BTC) remains to be established, despite the fact that the majority of patients diagnosed with BTC tend to be aged ≥ 70 years. In this study, we used three databases to examine the effectiveness of chemotherapy in a large patient population aged ≥ 70 years with metastatic BTC.MethodsUsing a large Japanese database that combined three data sources (Osaka Cancer Registry, Japan’s Diagnosis Procedure Combination, the hospital-based cancer registry database), we extracted the data from patients pathologically diagnosed with metastatic BTC, between January 1, 2013, and December 31, 2015, in 30 designated cancer care hospitals (DCCHs). A cohort of patients with comparable backgrounds was identified using propensity score matching. The log-rank test was used to examine how chemotherapy affected overall survival (OS).ResultsAmong 2,622 registered patients with BTC in 30 DCCHs, 207 older adult patients aged > 70 years with metastatic BTC were selected. Chemotherapy significantly improved the prognosis of older adult patients, according to propensity score matching (chemotherapy, 6.4 months vs. best supportive care, 1.8 months, P value < 0.001). The number of patients receiving chemotherapy tends to decrease with age. Gemcitabine plus cisplatin (GC) and gemcitabine plus S-1 (oral fluoropyrimidine) (GS) combination therapy were frequently performed in the chemotherapy group for patients under 80 years of age (70–74 years, 61.7%; 75–79 years, 62.8%). In contrast, monotherapy including GEM and S-1 was more frequently performed in age groups over 80 years (80–84 years, 56.2%; 85–89 years, 77.7%; ≥90 years, 100%). In the chemotherapy group among older adult patients aged < 85 years, the median OS was significantly longer according to age-group analysis of the 5-year age range following propensity score matching.ConclusionsIn older adult patients with metastatic BTC who received chemotherapy, prolonged survival was observed. Chemotherapy may be a viable option for patients with metastatic BTC who are aged < 85 years.

Real-world treatment patterns and survival outcomes for treated biliary tract cancer patients using administrative databases in Ontario.

There are limited data available on treatment patterns and outcomes of biliary tract cancers (BTCs) in Canada. The aim of this study was to understand treatment patterns, survival outcomes and healthcare resource use of BTC patients in Ontario, Canada. We conducted a retrospective population-level study using administrative data of patients diagnosed with advanced or metastatic BTC between January 1, 2010 and December 31, 2019. A total of 2,142 BTC patients were identified; 702 (32.8%) with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, 688 (32.1%) with extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, 363 (16.9%) with gallbladder cancer, 174 (8.1%) with ampulla of Vater cancer, and 215 (10.0%) with other types of BTC. In total, 1,314 patients (61.3%) were recurrent cases, and 828 (38.7%) were diagnosed with de novo advanced disease. A total of 1,727 patients (80.6%) received first-line systemic treatment of cisplatin plus gemcitabine (75.2%), FOLFOX [5-fluorouracil (5-FU), folinic acid (FA), and oxaliplatin] or FOLFIRI (5-FU, FA, and irinotecan) (11.5%), carboplatin plus gemcitabine (7.6%), or gemcitabine plus taxane (5.7%). Five hundred and twelve patients (29.6%) went on to receive a second-line treatment. Mean and median overall survival from diagnosis was 20.6 and 11.0 months, respectively. Mean and median overall survival from diagnosis was much higher among patients who received a systemic treatment at 23.8 and 14.1 months, respectively compared to 7.0 and 3.3 months, respectively for untreated patients (P<0.0001). Platinum and gemcitabine combinations are the most common first-line treatments. However, only a small proportion of patients go on to receive subsequent treatments. Survival in treated patients is higher than that in untreated patients. Our findings highlight the unmet need for effective systemic therapies for BTC.

Safety and Effectiveness of Chemotherapy in Elderly Biliary Tract Cancer Patients.

The safety and effectiveness of chemotherapy in elderly patients with biliary tract cancer (BTC) remain unclear. Therefore, we retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent chemotherapy for locally advanced, metastatic, or recurrent BTC at our institution from January 2016 to December 2021. Of the 283 included patients, 91 (32.5%) were aged 75 years or older when initiating chemotherapy. Elderly patients were more likely than non-elderly patients to receive monotherapy with gemcitabine or S-1 (58.7% vs. 9.4%, p < 0.001) and were less likely to experience grade 3-4 toxicities (55.4% vs. 70.2%, p = 0.015). The rates of termination due to intolerance (6.5% vs. 5.8%, p = 0.800) and transition to second-line chemotherapy (39.1% vs. 40.3%, p = 0.849) were similar between groups. In the overall cohort, age was not an independent predictor of overall survival (OS). Within the elderly cohort, there were no differences in severe adverse events between patients receiving monotherapy and combination therapy (50.0% vs. 63.2%, p = 0.211). Median OS was longer in the combination therapy group (10.4 vs. 14.1 months; p = 0.010); however, choice of monotherapy was not an independent predictor of overall survival. Monotherapy appears to be a viable alternative in selected elderly BTC patients.