Abstract. There are various studies on the integration of building information modelling (BIM) and geographic information system (GIS) that convert BIM data into GIS data. These studies used different technologies, data standards, data models, and data formats such as RDF (Resource Description Framework), graph, CityGML, and Shapefile to address the data incompatibility problem between BIM and GIS. This makes it difficult to compare these studies for the purpose of assessing research innovation, and sometimes, improper comparisons were carried out between studies. To solve this problem, this study adopted the metamodeling theory used in model-driven software engineering (MDSE) and extended its 4-layer framework of level of abstraction. The new benchmarking framework, referred to as level of abstraction for BIM/GIS data integration (BG-LoA), has 5 levels, including meta metamodel (M3), metamodel (M2), model (M1), reality (data) (M0), and reality (real world) (M00). The common types of IFC (Industry Foundation Classes) conversion were analysed using the new framework, including IFC-to-CityGML, IFC-to-CityJSON, IFC-to-Shapefile, IFC-to-GML, IFC-to-3DTiles, IFC-to-RDF, IFC-to-IfcGraph, and IFC-to-UML. The result shows that the new framework can show the difference between those conversion types, which makes it easier for future studies to benchmark their work and assess level of contribution to the body of knowledge.
Read full abstract