Metal-on-metal Total Hip Replacement Research Articles

Long-Term Outcomes of Articular Surface Replacement (ASR) Implant in Hip Arthroplasty: A Single Institution Review.

Various metal-on-metal (MoM) total hip replacements (THRs) have been found to have high short-term failure rates due to adverse responses to metal debris (ARMD). As a consequence, several low-performing THRs have been removed off the market. The purpose of this research was to look at the at least five-year outcomes of patients who had MoM hip arthroplasty at our institution. In one specialised centre between 2007 and 2008, 24 Articular Surface Replacement (ASRTM, DePuy, Warsaw, IN, USA) MoM THRs (in 24 patients, mean age: 56.4 years) were implanted. DePuy ASR hip prosthesis for osteoarthritis or hip fractures were employed in the THR system. All patients were summoned back for a clinical assessment, and imaging was done as needed. The average period of follow-up was 8.0 years (6.0-10 years). In all, eight instances (33.3%) were discovered to have pseudotumors, four hips (16.7%) were revised, and one (4.1%) was operated for ARMD. The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) and Oxford ratings improved statistically significantly five years after surgery in all three areas of pain, disability, and stiffness; however, there was no statistically significant change in the 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36) (mental) score. MoM hip arthroplasty had a greater revision incidence at five years in our group, presumably owing to the adoption of a smaller femoral head size.

Uncemented versus cemented arthroplasty after metal-on-metal total hip replacement in patients with femoral neck fractures: a retrospective study.

ObjectiveTo compare the clinical outcomes of primary metal-on-metal total hip replacement (MoM-TR) converted to uncemented total hip replacement (UTR) or cemented total hip replacement (CTR) in patients with femoral neck fractures (AO/OTA: 31B/C).MethodsPatient data of 234 UTR or CTR revisions after primary MoM-TR failure from March 2007 to January 2018 were retrospectively identified. Clinical outcomes, including the Harris hip score (HHS) and key orthopaedic complications, were collected at 3, 6, and 12 months following conversion and every 12 months thereafter.ResultsThe mean follow-up was 84.12 (67–100) months for UTR and 84.23 (66–101) months for CTR. At the last follow-up, the HHS was better in the CTR- than UTR-treated patients. Noteworthy dissimilarities were correspondingly detected in the key orthopaedic complication rates (16.1% for CTR vs. 47.4% for UTR). Statistically significant differences in specific orthopaedic complications were also detected in the re-revision rate (10.3% for UTR vs. 2.5% for CTR), prosthesis loosening rate (16.3% for UTR vs. 5.9% for CTR), and periprosthetic fracture rate (12.0% for UTR vs. 4.2% for CTR).ConclusionIn the setting of revision of failed primary MoM-TR, CTR may demonstrate advantages over UTR in improving functional outcomes and reducing key orthopaedic complications.

It's worth cleaning – The examination of the female taper could identify a particular cause of trunnionosis at revision 16 years after total hip arthroplasty

Adverse reaction to metal debris (ARMD) is an issue in metal-on-metal (MoM) total hip replacements (THR). It mainly affects large-head MoM THR, whereas 28–32 mm MoM pairings are associated with low long-term revision rates. However, the bearing surface is not necessarily the only cause of metal debris. This report documents with advanced analysis of the retrievals a particular cause of trunnionosis in late failure of a small diameter MoM THR and illustrates the importance of cleaning of the taper when seating the head in THR. A 65-year-old patient was revised due to ARMD 16 years after small diameter MoM THR. Debridement and exchange of the inlay and the head had been performed through an anterior approach. While the cup and the outer surface of the head were accessible to direct analysis by an optical coordinate measuring machine, the female taper had to be analysed indirectly by measuring an imprint. Wear from the cup and the head was within expected low ranges. The analysis of the female taper identified bone fragments, which contributed to trunnionosis. Failure due to ARMD after MoM THR is not necessarily caused by the bearing, but can be due to trunnionosis. Bone fragments within the taper contact in this case highlight the importance of meticulous cleaning of the taper before seating the head, to avoid trunnionosis.

Favourable clinical outcomes following cemented arthroplasty after metal-on-metal total hip replacement: a retrospective study with a mean follow-up of 10\u2009years

BackgroundGiven the unexpected high rate of failure following metal-on-metal total hip replacement (MoM-THR), it is expected that more MoM-THR patients will experience revision. The long-term outcomes regarding the primary MoM-THR revised to cemented THR (CTHR) remain controversial. The purpose of this retrospective review was to evaluate the long-term outcomes of patients who underwent conversion from MoM-THR to CTHR.MethodsA total of 220 patients (220 hips) who underwent a conversion of primary MoM-THR to CTHR from March 2006 to October 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. The primary outcomes were the functional outcomes assessed using the Harris hip scores (HHS) and major radiographic outcomes. Follow-ups occurred at 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, and then every two years after revision.ResultsMean follow-up was 10.1 years (5–13 years). Distinct improvements were detected in the mean HHS between the preoperative and last follow-up analysis (62.35[±8.49] vs. 84.70[±14.68], respectively, p < 0.001). The key orthopaedic complication rate was 18.2% (27/148). Seven (4.7%) cases experienced a CTHR failure at a mean of 3.4 (±1.2) years after revision MoM-THR, mostly attributed to recurrent dislocation.ConclusionCTHR might yield an acceptable functional score and a low rate of the key orthopaedic complications.

Long Term Performance of an Uncemented, Proximally Hydroxyapatite Coated, Double Tapered, Titanium-Alloy Femoral Stem: Results From 1465 Hips at 10 years Minimum Follow-Up

BackgroundWe assessed the survivorship of a proximally hydroxyapatite coated, double tapered, titanium-alloy femoral stem in a single center, at an average follow up of 12.5 years (10.1-15.8). The majority of stems were inserted as part of a Metal on Metal (MoM) Total Hip Replacement (THR). MethodsData was collected prospectively in a local database. A retrospective review was performed of all patients undergoing a primary THR with the prosthesis between 2003 and 2010. Primary outcome was revision of the stem for any cause. Analysis was also performed for stem revision for aseptic loosening, stem revision in the MoM setting and a worst case scenario whereby lost to follow up were presumed to have failed. True stem failure was considered if revision occurred for a stem related complication. Results1465 stems were included (1310 patients, 155 bilateral). The bearing surface was cobalt chrome on cobalt chrome in 1351 cases (92%). Seven hips were lost to follow up. Thirty-two stems (31 part of a MoM THR) underwent revision for any cause. Kaplan Meier survival analysis demonstrates an overall 97.4% survivorship. Subset analysis demonstrates 100% survivorship for aseptic loosening, 97.3% in the MoM setting and 96.7% for the worst case senario. Of the 32 cases of stem revision, only 13 were classified as ’true’ stem failure. ConclusionThis study represents the largest cohort of this uncemented femoral component with a minimum follow-up longer than 10 years. Our results demonstrate excellent long-term survivorship even in the presence of a challenging MoM environment.

Does modularity of metal-on-metal hip implants increase cobalt: chromium ratio?

Blood metal ion levels are used in the surveillance of metal-on-metal (MoM) hip implants. Modular implants contain an extra source of metal debris that may affect the ratio of metal ions in the blood. This was a retrospective study of 503 patients with hip replacements made by a single manufacturer (Smith & Nephew, Warwick, UK) with the same bearing surface. There were 54 total hip arthroplasties, 35 Birmingham Mid-Head Resections and 414 hip resurfacings. Whole blood metal ion levels and their ratios were analysed to investigate the effect of a modular junction. The cobalt:chromium ratios were greater in the total hip arthroplasty group (mean 2.3:1) when compared to the resurfacings group (mean 1.3:1, p = <0.05) and Birmingham Mid-Head Resection group (mean 1.1:1, p = 0.11). This study demonstrated a trend for a higher cobalt:chromium ratio in patients with MoM total hip replacement that may be due to metal debris from the modular stem-head junction. Further work is required to correlate clinical data with retrieval analysis to confirm the effect of taper material loss on the cobalt:chromium ratio.

MoM total hip replacements in Europe: a NORE report.

The purpose of this paper is to determine the prevalence of metal-on-metal (MoM) total hip replacement (THR) in European registries, to assess the incidence of revision surgery and to describe the national follow-up guidelines for patients with MoM THR including resurfacings.Eleven registries of the Network of Orthopaedic Registries of Europe (NORE) participated totalling 54 434 resurfacings and 58 498 large stemmed MoM THRs.The resurfacings and stemmed large head MoM had higher pooled revision rates at five years than the standard total hip arthroplasties (THA): 6.0%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 5.3 to 6.8 for resurfacings; 6.9%, 95% CI 4.4 to 9.4 for stemmed large head MoM; and 3.0%, 95% CI 2.5 to 3.6 for conventional THA.The resurfacings and stemmed large head MoM had higher pooled revision rates at ten years than the standard THAs: 12.1%, 95% CI 11.0 to 13.3 for resurfacings; 15.5%, 95% CI 9.0 to 22 for stemmed large head MoM; and 5.1%, 95% CI 3.8 to 6.4 for conventional THA.Although every national registry reports slightly different protocols for follow-up, these mostly consist of annual assessments of cobalt and chromium levels in blood and MRI (MARS) imaging.Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2019;4 DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.4.180078

Contamination of revision procedures in patients with adverse tissues reaction to metal on metal implant.

The aim of this study is to evaluate the incidence of infections in MoM total hip replacement revisions and to propose a therapeutic algorithm that can reduce the onset of this complication. Total hip arthroplasty is one of the most successful procedures performed annually in the world. As the population ages, the number of primary arthroplasty procedures performed each year is rising in conjunction with an increasing revision burden. Metal on Metal (MoM) total hip arthroplasties were reintroduced in over the last fifteen years to meet these needs, larger diameters, improved lubrication, better stability, increased ROM and wear properties of the bearing couple. These advantageous features have led to an exponential diffusion of MoM. Since over last decade, it has become evident that hip replacements with MoM bearing have significantly higher revision rates compared to those with Metal on Polyethylene. The common pathway for this failure mode appears to be increased wear or corrosion with excessive release of metal ions and nanoparticles. Complications such as elevated serum metal ion levels, aseptic lymphocyte-dominated vasculitis-associated lesion (ALVAL) and pseudotumours have all been well documented, but recent studies suggest increased risk of infection with MoM bearing surfaces. We collect data from a cohort of 44 patients who underwent revision of total hip arthroplasty between 2014 and 2017 for the complication of MoM bearing. Studied by radiological images, blood tests, and intraoperative clinical status, part of the population was treated with one stage revision, while the other was treated with a two-stage revision. Results showed a difference in the occurrence of infections in the two populations. We consider it appropriate to perform two-stage revision in all case of failure of MoM replacement so as to allow to minimize the likelihood of infection in patients with damaged tissues by ALVAL, pseudotumour, and necrosis that could create an ideal environment for bacterial development.

Association between periprosthetic tissue metal content, whole blood and synovial fluid metal ion levels and histopathological findings in patients with failed metal-on-metal hip replacement.

Adverse Reaction to Metal Debris (ARMD) is a major cause of implant failure leading to revision surgery in patients with metal-on-metal (MoM) hip arthroplasties. However, the pathogenesis and its association to implant wear are poorly understood and previous studies have yielded discrepant results. We sought to investigate the associations between histological findings, whole blood and synovial fluid metal ion concentrations and periprosthetic tissue metal concentrations in patients with MoM total hip replacements and hip resurfacings revised for ARMD. 107 hips in total were included in our study. Of these, 87 were total hip replacements and 20 were hip resurfacings, respectively. We found that whole blood, synovial fluid and periprosthetic tissue metal concentrations correlated poorly with histological findings. We suggest that the lack of a clear association between histological findings and wear measures in the present study as well as in previous studies is mostly influenced by variability in patient susceptibility. However, patients presenting with perivascular lymphocytic infiltration had lower chromium concentration in their periprosthetic tissues than patients with no perivascular lymphocytic infiltration. This may reflect the role of metal hypersensitivity in implant failure in these patients. Patients with total hip replacements evinced more necrosis and lymphocytic infiltration in their tissues than patients with hip resurfacings. This suggests that trunnion wear debris is more cytotoxic and/or immunogenic than bearing wear debris leading to higher failure rates seen in patients with total hip replacements.

Cobalt serum levels differ in well functioning Birmingham resurfacing and Birmingham modular THA.

Metal-on-metal (MoM) bearings are known to release metal ions secondary to wear and corrosion. This may cause local reactions (adverse soft tissue reactions and osteolysis) and systemic effects. Little is known about the exact pattern and the differences between large head MoM total hip replacements (THA) and resurfacings (HR). (1) Is there a difference in metal ion concentrations between HR and MoM-THR using the same bearing design (Birmingham Hip Resurfacing System, Smith & Nephew, Inc. Memphis, TN, USA)? (2) Are metal ion levels changing over time in MoM-THA or HR? (3) Do acetabular inclination angle and femoral component size influence cobalt and chromium levels? Is there a correlation between clinical outcome and metal ion levels? A retrospective analysis was conducted in 77 well functioning unilateral Birmingham HR and 42 well functioning unilateral modular Birmingham MoM-THA (Smith & Nephew, Inc. Memphis, TN, USA) operated on between 2007 and 2012. Blood samples were taken at a minimum of 13months and subsequent during annual follow-ups. (1) Cobalt levels were significantly higher in MoM-THA compared to HR (p<0.001). There was no significant difference in chromium levels (p=0.313). (2) Cobalt is increasing over time in MoM-THA (p=0.030) whereas metal ions remain stable in HR. (3) Metal ion levels were not affected by acetabular inclination angle and femoral component size in MoM-THA. Chromium levels correlate with the femoral component size (r=-0.240; p=0.037), the UCLA activity score (r=-0.344; p=0.003) and the VAS (r=0.263; p=0.38) in HR. Considering that HR and MoM-THA used the same MoM bearing design, increased cobalt levels may be related to trunnion wear or corrosion. Elevated cobalt levels should raise concern for corrosion related failure in MoM-THA.

Prevalence of Failure due to Adverse Reaction to Metal Debris in Modern, Medium and Large Diameter Metal-on-Metal Hip Replacements--The Effect of Novel Screening Methods: Systematic Review and Metaregression Analysis.

Metal-on-metal (MoM) hip replacements were used for almost a decade before adverse reactions to metal debris (ARMD) were found to be a true clinical problem. Currently, there is a paucity of evidence regarding the usefulness of systematic screening for ARMD. We implemented a systematic review and meta-analysis to establish the prevalence of revision confirmed ARMD stratified by the use of different screening protocols in patients with MoM hip replacements. Five levels of screening were identified: no screening (level 0), targeted blood metal ion measurement and/or cross-sectional imaging (level 1), metal ion measurement without imaging (level 2), metal ion measurement with targeted imaging (level 3) and comprehensive screening (both metal ions and imaging for all; level 4). 122 studies meeting our eligibility criteria were included in analysis. These studies included 144 study arms: 100 study arms with hip resurfacings, 33 study arms with large-diameter MoM total hip replacements (THR), and 11 study arms with medium-diameter MoM THRs. For hip resurfacing, the lowest prevalence of ARMD was seen with level 0 screening (pooled prevalence 0.13%) and the highest with level 4 screening (pooled prevalace 9.49%). Pooled prevalence of ARMD with level 0 screening was 0.29% and with level 4 screening 21.3% in the large-diameter MoM THR group. In metaregression analysis of hip resurfacings, level 4 screening was superior with regard to prevalence of ARMD when compared with other levels. In the large diameter THR group level 4 screening was superior to screening 0,2 and 3. These outcomes were irrespective of follow-up time or study publication year. With hip resurfacings, routine cross-sectional imaging regardless of clinical findings is advisable. It is clear, however, that targeted metal ion measurement and/or imaging is not sufficient in the screening for ARMD in any implant concepts. However, economic aspects should be weighed when choosing the preferred screening level.

CT-based quantification of bone stock in large head metal-on-metal unilateral total hip replacements

PurposeTo explore ipsilateral and contralateral acetabular roof bone stock density in unilateral large head MoM THA whether there is a significant lower acetabular bone stock in the hip with a metal-on-metal (MoM) total hip replacement compared to the contralateral side. Second part of this study is to examine if there are any associates with regard to potential bone stock density difference. Materials & methodsA database of 317 patients with unilateral metal-on-metal (MoM) total hip replacements was set up retrospectively for this study. On computed tomography scans, conducted after a relative short in situ time period averaging 2.8 years, regions-of-interests were drawn in the trabecular bone of the acetabulum to measure average Hounsfield Units (HU). HU differences were calculated and tested by Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Univariate analysis was conducted to examine associates of potential bone loss. ResultsIn a population of 317 patients (156 male, 161 female) with an average age of 61.9±7.8, the median HU on the side of the MoM replacement was 123.3 (7.6–375.4). On the contralateral side, median HU was 144.7 (−0.4 to 332.8). The median HU difference was 21.4 after a mean post-operative in situ time of 2.8 years. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test proved a significant difference (p<0.001). Univariate analyses show that the in situ time of the MoM THA has a significant correlation with the bone density difference. ConclusionResults show a significant lower bone density at the acetabular roof at the side of the prosthesis compared with the contralateral side after short in situ time of the MoM THA in patients with unilateral MoM total hip replacements. In our patient population, the in situ time showed a significant association with the acetabular bone density difference. As acetabular roof bone stock measurements are feasible and show temporal decline this could become an important parameter to be used in orthopedic decision making for revision surgery.

Association Between Total Hip Replacement Characteristics and 3-Year Prosthetic Survivorship

Total hip replacement (THR) is successful in treating hip arthritis. Prosthetic survivorship may depend on characteristics of the implant, notably THR fixation technique and bearing surface type. To compare THR short-term survivorship according to cement type and bearing surface. The cohort included all French patients aged 40 years or older covered by the general scheme of the French national health insurance system who had undergone THR from April 1, 2010, through December 31, 2011, for arthritis, according to French national health insurance databases. The cohort was followed up until December 31, 2013. The THR survivorship was assessed according to cement type and bearing surface in univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression models adjusted for patient and implanting center characteristics. Antibiotic-free cemented THRs and antibiotic-impregnated cemented THRs were compared with uncemented THRs. Ceramic-on-ceramic (CoC), ceramic-on-polyethylene (CoP), and metal-on-metal (MoM) THRs were compared with metal-on-polyethylene (MoP) THRs. Revision, including any surgical reintervention in which the implant or any of its components was changed or removed. The study cohort comprised 100 191 individuals: mean age at baseline, 69.5 years; women, 56.6%; uncemented THR, 74.8%; antibiotic-free cemented THR, 3.8%; antibiotic-impregnated cemented THR, 21.4%; CoC, 40.9%; MoP, 33.9%; CoP, 20.8%; and MoM, 4.4%. During the median 33-month follow-up period, 3142 individuals underwent prosthetic revision. Antibiotic-impregnated cemented THRs had a better prognosis than uncemented THRs: cumulative revision rates were 2.4% and 3.3%, respectively (P < .001), and the multivariate adjusted hazard ratio was 0.75 (95% CI, 0.67-0.84; P < .001). This association was particularly significant in women. The CoP and CoC THRs were no different from the MoP THR. The MoM THR had slightly shorter survivorship compared with the MoP THR (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.01-1.43; P < .001). Characteristics of THR are related to early prosthetic revision: antibiotic-impregnated cemented THRs have a better prognosis and MoM THRs a worse one. These findings are useful in helping surgeons select a THR fixation technique and helpful for both patient and surgeon in the decision-making process.

Adverse reaction to metal debris is more common in patients following MoM total hip replacement with a 36 mm femoral head than previously thought: results from a modern MoM follow-up programme.

We conducted a retrospective study to assess the prevalence of adverse reactions to metal debris (ARMD) in patients operated on at our institution with metal-on-metal (MoM) total hip replacements with 36 mm heads using a Pinnacle acetabular shell. A total of 326 patients (150 males, 175 hips; 176 females, 203 hips) with a mean age of 62.7 years (28 to 85) and mean follow-up of 7.5 years (0.1 to 10.8) participating in our in-depth modern MoM follow-up programme were included in the study, which involved recording whole blood cobalt and chromium ion measurements, Oxford hip scores (OHS) and plain radiographs of the hip and targeted cross-sectional imaging. Elevated blood metal ion levels (> 5 parts per billion) were seen in 32 (16.1%) of the 199 patients who underwent unilateral replacement. At 23 months after the start of our modern MoM follow-up programme, 29 new cases of ARMD had been revealed. Hence, the nine-year survival of this cohort declined from 96% (95% CI 95 to 98) with the old surveillance routine to 86% (95% CI 82 to 90) following the new protocol. Although ARMD may not be as common in 36 mm MoM THRs as in those with larger heads, these results support the Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency guidelines on regular reviews and further investigations, and emphasise the need for specific a follow-up programme for patients with MoM THRs.

Revision of metal-on-metal hip replacements and resurfacings for adverse reaction to metal debris: a systematic review of outcomes.

This systematic review assessed evidence on outcomes following revision of MoM hip resurfacings (HRs) and total hip replacements (THRs) for adverse reaction to metal debris (ARMD). Four electronic databases were searched between January 2009 and July 2013 to identify studies reporting clinical outcomes following revision of MoM HRs and THRs for ARMD. Only studies reporting cohorts with more than 10 metal-on-metal (MoM) hips revised for ARMD were included. Outcomes of interest following ARMD revision were: (1) complication rates; (2) re-revision rates; (3) surgical intervention other than re-revision; (4) functional outcome. Of 148 unique studies identified, six studies were eligible for inclusion containing 216 MoM hips (197 HRs and 19 THRs) revised for ARMD. Mean follow-up time from ARMD revision ranged between 21-61 months. Complication rates were 4%-50% for HR and 68% for THR. Re-revision rates were 3%-38% for HR and 21% for THR. Dislocation (n = 14), ARMD recurrence (n = 11), and acetabular loosening (n = 9) were the three commonest complications and indications for re-revision. All six studies reported between one and three cases of ARMD recurrence during follow-up. One study specifically reported on performing procedures other than re-revision with 26% requiring closed reductions for dislocated THRs. Functional outcomes following ARMD revision were good or satisfactory in all but two studies. Limited evidence exists regarding outcomes following revision of MoM hips for ARMD, especially for THRs. This should be addressed in future studies and may be important when counselling asymptomatic individuals in whom revision is considered for raised blood metal ions.

Asymptomatic pseudotumours after metal-on-metal hip resurfacing show little change within one year

The aim of this study was to establish the natural course of unrevised asymptomatic pseudotumours after metal-on-metal (MoM) hip resurfacing during a six- to 12-month follow-up period. We used repeated metal artefact reduction sequence (MARS)-magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), serum metal ion analysis and clinical examination to study 14 unrevised hips (mean patient age 52.7 years, 46 to 68, 5 female, 7 male) with a pseudotumour and 23 hips (mean patient age 52.8 years, 38 to 69, 7 female, 16 male) without a pseudotumour. The mean post-operative time to the first MARS-MRI scan was 4.3 years (2.2 to 8.3), and mean time between the first and second MARS-MRI scan was eight months (6 to 12). At the second MRI scan, the grade of severity of the pseudotumour had not changed in 35 hips. One new pseudotumour (Anderson C2 score, moderate) was observed, and one pseudotumour was downgraded from C2 (moderate) to C1 (mild). In general, the characteristics of the pseudotumours hardly changed. Repeated MARS-MRI scans within one year in patients with asymptomatic pseudotumours after MoM hip resurfacing showed little or no variation. In 23 patients without pseudotumour, one new asymptomatic pseudotumour was detected. This is the first longitudinal study on the natural history of pseudotumours using MARS-MRI scans in hip resurfacing, and mirrors recent results for 28 mm diameter MoM total hip replacement.

Imaging Metal-on-Metal Hip Replacements: the Norwich Experience

BackgroundAdverse reaction to metal debris is a relatively recently described and often a silent complication of metal-on-metal (MOM) total hip replacements (THR). The Norfolk & Norwich University Hospital has been performing metal artefact reduction (MARS) MRI for 8 years in a variety of different types of MOM THR.Questions/purposesThe aims of this review are to describe the experience of using MARS MRI in Norwich and to compare our experience with that published by other groups.MethodsA MEDLINE keyword search was performed for studies including MRI in MOM THR. Relevant publications were reviewed and compared with published data from the Norfolk & Norwich University Hospital. The similarities and differences between these data were compared and possible explanations for these discussed.ResultsMARS MRI appears to be the most useful tool for diagnosing, staging and monitoring adverse reactions to metal debris (ARMD). There appears to be no clinically useful association between clinical and serological markers of disease and the severity of MR findings. Although severe early ARMD is associated with significant morbidity, mild disease is often stable for years. If patients with normal initial MR examinations develop ARMD, this usually occurs 7 years. A 1-year interval between MRI examinations is reasonable in asymptomatic patients.ConclusionsThere is a general international consensus that ARMD is prevalent in symptomatic and asymptomatic patients with MOM THR and that while appearances vary with the type of prosthesis, there are characteristic features that make MARS MRI essential for diagnosis, staging and surveillance of the disease.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s11420-013-9357-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Serial magnetic resonance imaging of metal-on-metal total hip replacements

Metal artefact reduction (MAR) MRI is now widely considered to be the standard for imaging metal-on-metal (MoM) hip implants. The Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) has recommended cross-sectional imaging for all patients with symptomatic MoM bearings. This paper describes the natural history of MoM disease in a 28 mm MoM total hip replacement (THR) using MAR MRI. Inclusion criteria were patients with MoM THRs who had not been revised and had at least two serial MAR MRI scans. All examinations were reported by an experienced observer and classified as A (normal), B (infection) or C1–C3 (mild, moderate, severe MoM-related abnormalities). Between 2002 and 2011 a total of 239 MRIs were performed on 80 patients (two to four scans per THR); 63 initial MRIs (61%) were normal. On subsequent MRIs, six initially normal scans (9.5%) showed progression to a disease state; 15 (15%) of 103 THRs with sequential scans demonstrated worsening disease on subsequent imaging. Most patients with a MoM THR who do not undergo early revision have normal MRI scans. Late progression (from normal to abnormal, or from mild to more severe MoM disease) is not common and takes place over several years. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2013;95-B:1035–9.

Clinical Manifestations in Ten Patients with Asymptomatic Metal-on-Metal Hip Arthroplasty with Very High Cobalt Levels

Reports of adverse reactions to metal particle debris with metal-on-metal (MoM) hip arthroplasty have increased recently. Apart from the formation of pseudotumours and higher revision rates, another major cause for concern are the systemic effects of metal ions. Several effects of elevated systemic cobalt ions have been reported (e.g., myocardial and neurological effects, hypothyroidism). All 643 patients who underwent a stemmed large head MoM total hip replacement in our clinic were screened with repeated whole blood samples of metal ions (cobalt, chromium). We included ten asymptomatic unrevised patients with the highest cobalt concentrations, determined at a minimum of three years after implantation. These patients were subjected to an extensive neurological and cardiological screening protocol. In addition, blood samples were taken to assess renal and thyroid function. Ten patients with a cobalt level of 18-153 µg/L (mean 46.8 µg/L) were included. Nine patients were female, mean age was 65 years (range 56-75). The mean follow-up period was 4.2 years (range 3.0-6.1). Seven patients had bilateral stemmed MoM hip arthroplasty. No signs or symptoms of neurological dysfunction, cardiomyopathy, or renal or thyroid dysfunction could be identified or attributed to elevated cobalt levels. The clinical relevance of this study is that after short-term follow-up highly elevated blood cobalt levels do not cause systemic effects in our population. Hence in asymptomatic patients metal ions appear not to be a significant factor in the decision of when to revise a MoM large head total hip replacement.

Failure analysis of cemented metal-on-metal total hip replacements from a single centre cohort

This paper presents the failure analysis of cemented metal on metal (MoM) total hip replacements (THR) from a single centre cohort. In this paper all retrieved femoral stems were implanted and revised at the Norfolk and Norwich University hospital by three specialist hip surgeons. All patients were subjected to the same combination of metallic implants, operative and follow up procedure. Between 1997 and 2008, 652 Ultima TPS™ femoral stems with the Ultima MoM articulation (DePuy International, Leeds) were implanted. At 2–9 years follow up, 90 revisions had been performed. Upon removal extensive fretting-corrosion of the cemented portions of the femoral stems was seen, resulting in high metal ion levels. In order to fully understand the factors resulting in failure of these cemented MoM THR optical light microscopy, Scanning Electron Microscopy with integrated Energy Dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (SEM/EDX) and X-ray Photo-electron spectroscopy (XPS) were utilised in order to assess the surface morphology and chemistry of retrieved MoM THR and surface chemistry of the films found on the surface. Gross slip, plastic deformation and directionality of the surface were extensively seen on the proximal surfaces of the retrievals. A more corrosive phenomenon was in the distal regions of the stem, demonstrating a seemingly inter-granular attack. SEM/EDX analysis demonstrated that black films present commonly seen on the highly worn regions of the cemented portions of the femoral stem were a complex mixture of chromium oxide, protein and amorphous carbon. XPS demonstrated films were Cr, O rich, mixed with organic material.