Metachronous Colorectal Metastases Research Articles

Incidence and management of patients with colorectal cancer and synchronous and metachronous colorectal metastases: a population-based study.

BackgroundThis population‐based study aimed to examine the incidence, patterns and results of multimodal management of metastatic colorectal cancer.MethodsA retrospective population‐based study was conducted on patients with metastatic colorectal cancer in Central Finland in 2000–2015. Clinical and histopathological data were retrieved and descriptive analysis was conducted to determine the pattern of metastatic disease, defined as synchronous, early metachronous (within 12 months of diagnosis of primary disease) and late metachronous (more than 12 months after diagnosis). Subgroups were compared for resection and overall survival (OS) rates.ResultsOf 1671 patients, 296 (17·7 per cent) had synchronous metastases, and 255 (19·6 per cent) of 1302 patients with resected stage I–III tumours developed metachronous metastases (94 early and 161 late metastases). Liver, pulmonary and intraperitoneal metastases were the most common sites. The commonest metastatic patterns were a combination of liver and lung metastases. The overall metastasectomy rate for patients with synchronous metastases was 16·2 per cent; in this subgroup, 3‐ and 5‐year OS rates after any resection were 63 and 44 per cent respectively, compared with 7·1 and 3·3 per cent following no resection (P < 0·001). The resection rate was higher for late than for early metachronous disease (28·0 versus 17 per cent respectively; P = 0·048). Three‐ and 5‐year OS rates after any resection of metachronous metastases were 78 and 62 per cent respectively versus 42·1 and 18·2 per cent with no metastasectomy (P < 0·001). Similarly, 3‐ and 5‐year OS rates after any metastasectomy for early metachronous metastases were 57 and 50 per cent versus 84 and 66 per cent for late metachronous metastases (P = 0·293).ConclusionThe proportion of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer was consistent with that in earlier population‐based studies, as were resection rates for liver and lung metastases and survival after resection. Differentiation between synchronous, early and late metachronous metastases can improve assessment of resectability and survival.

Is Delayed Liver Resection Appropriate for Patients with Metachronous Colorectal Metastases?

In terms of timing of resection for synchronous liver metastases from colon cancer, some reports recommend leaving an interval (e.g., 3months) after primary colorectal resection, because of reports of occasional and rapid remnant recurrence of residual liver metastases after simultaneous colorectal and liver resection (LR). For patients with metachronous liver metastasis (MLM), we prospectively examined the appropriateness of a 3-month interval to LR (i.e., delayed resection) following initial detection of hepatic lesions from the viewpoints of (1) detection of new metastases during this interval and (2) postoperative outcome. Seventy-nine consecutive patients with modified Japanese criteria H1 class MLM (i.e., ≤4 nodules, 6cm or less in diameter) and without obvious extrahepatic lesions, presenting between 1990 and 2008, were included in this study. Between 1990 and 2001, 52 patients were treated by LR without an interval (i.e., nondelayed group); from 2002, 27 patients were prospectively scheduled for LR at an interval of 3months after initial detection of metastases (i.e., delayed group). During the 3-month interval, no adjuvant chemotherapy was given. Just prior to LR, patients were re-evaluated using computed tomography (CT) and deoxy-2-[(18)F]fluoro-D: -glucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) to exclude cases unsuitable for surgery. Out of 27 patients in the delayed group, 2 (7.4%) did not undergo LR after the 3-month interval and were excluded from the analysis: one because of multiple nodules in the bilateral lobe of the liver with pulmonary metastases and another because of para-aortic lymph node metastasis. Of the 25 patients for whom LR was indicated, 24 underwent LR as initially planned. In the remaining patient, after the 3-month interval, invasion of the tumor had occurred into the inferior vena cava (IVC) and other surgery in addition to the planned operation was required. When comparing the postoperative outcome data of the delayed group (n=25) with the nondelayed group (n=52), overall early recurrence within 1year after LR was noticed in 30.9% (16/52) of the nondelayed group and 28.0% (7/25) of the delayed group; the incidence of only early extrahepatic recurrence decreased 5.1% in the delayed group (21.1% versus 16.0%, respectively). When comparing disease-free survival after liver resection, however, there was no significant difference between the groups. Delayed LR for MLM patients after initial detection of hepatic lesions is of no clinical benefit. Only in cases when extrahepatic lesions with MLM are suspected could an interval make such lesions clearer and assist in deciding on a suitable management plan.

Major hepatic resection. Indications and results in a national hospital system from 1988 to 1992.

To determine the indications for and outcomes of hepatic resection in a US hospital system. A retrospective study of 444 consecutive hepatic resections (i.e., 286 wedge or segmental resections and 158 lobectomies) using computerized medical records. All US Department of Veterans Affairs hospitals. US veterans (99% men). Major hepatic resection. Survival, as determined by the absence of a death record. One hundred fifty-eight lobectomies or larger resections were recorded (36% of the total); the 30-day operative mortality was 12% for lobectomies and 5% for wedge resections. However, the diagnosis had a greater influence on the operative mortality: 11 (4%) of 275 patients with colorectal metastases, 15 (21%) of 71 patients with hepatomas, 2 (9%) of 23 patients without cancer (but 0 [0%] of 7 patients with hemangiomas), 3 (12%) of 25 patients with cholangiocarcinomas, and 4 (8%) of 50 patients with metastases from other primary cancers. Approximately one third (i.e., 92) of the patients who underwent a resection of their colorectal metastases underwent a resection of their colorectal metastases underwent a concurrent colectomy, while the rest of the patients underwent these surgical procedures metachronously. The operative mortality was equal (i.e., 4%) for the resection of synchronous vs metachronous colorectal metastases. The mean survival time after the resection of metachronous vs synchronous colorectal metastases was 34 months vs 30 months, respectively, and the projected 5-year survival after either procedure was 26%. The projected 5-year survival was 20% for patients with hepatoma and 8% for patients with cholangiocarcinoma. With uncommon pathologic types, the mean survival time after metastatic resection was longest for those with renal primary tumors (3 patients, 55 months). Hepatic resection is a safe and effective therapy for colorectal metastases (5-year survival, 26%) and hemangioma; hepatoma resection is dangerous (operative mortality, 21%) but effective (5-year survival, 20%).