Fixation Of Metacarpal Fractures Research Articles

Comparative Study between Results of Fixation of Metacarpal Fractures Using Bouquet Technique versus Transverse Pinning

Comparative Study between Results of Fixation of Metacarpal Fractures Using Bouquet Technique versus Transverse Pinning

Metacarpal Fracture Fixation with Intramedullary Screws.

Background: Intramedullary screws (IMS) have become a viable option for metacarpal fracture fixation. To further appraise their utility, this study assessed clinical and patient-reported short- and medium-term outcomes of IMS fixation for extra-articular metacarpal fractures. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was performed in a series of 32 patients (with a total of 37 fractures) who underwent metacarpal fracture fixation over a 42-month period between January 2020 and July 2023. Results: Mean time for return to work was 39.8 days; mean time for return to full function was 88.4 days; total active motion was 250.7° (range: 204.9-270.9); Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score was 2.3 (range: 0-22.7); mean visual analogue pain score was 0.9 out of 10 (range: 0-6) and a single complication was observed. Conclusions: The use of IMS in metacarpal fracture fixation is a practicable surgical option. IMS fixations yields a satisfactory duration for return to function, good postoperative range of movement, modest pain scores and low rates of complications. Level of Evidence: Level IV (Therapeutic).

Screw Position Following Percutaneous Versus Mini-Open Intramedullary Retrograde Screw Fixation of Metacarpal Fractures.

Metacarpal fracture fixation using the retrograde intramedullary screw technique can be performed through two different approaches. The mini-open approach requires greater soft tissue dissection but allows for direct visualization of the metacarpal head compared with the percutaneous approach. Our aim was to determine which approach resulted in optimal screw position. Eighty-one consecutive patients that underwent intramedullary screw fixation for metacarpal fractures from 2016 to 2021 were identified. Patients were treated by 4 fellowship-trained orthopedic hand surgeons who employed the mini-open or percutaneous approach. Postoperative radiographs were reviewed for screw position. A total of 81 patients (41 mini-open, 40 percutaneous) were included in this study. There were no significant differences between the two groups in age, sex, hand dominance, or affected digit. Postoperative screw position at first postoperative visit was not significantly different between the two groups on anteroposterior or lateral radiographs. Postoperative screw position is not significantly different between the mini-open and percutaneous approaches for intramedullary screw fixation of metacarpal fractures. Level III, therapeutic.

Early Return of Motion in Patients With Intramedullary Screw Placement for Metacarpal and Phalangeal Fracture Fixation.

Hand fractures are associated with significant morbidity. Current management standards often result in prolonged immobilization, stiffness, and delayed return to functional use. Intramedullary (IM) compression screws offer minimal soft tissue disruption and early postoperative active motion. In this study, we describe our outcomes after intraosseous fracture fixation using IM cannulated headless screws for a multitude of fracture patterns. This study is a retrospective review of patients who underwent IM screw placement for fixation of metacarpal and phalangeal fractures by a single surgeon from 2017 to 2022. Data were collected to include patient demographics, fracture details, postoperative complications, and follow-up. Time to range of motion and return to unrestricted motion was recorded. There were 69 patients with 92 fractures (n = 54 metacarpal, n = 38 phalanx). The median patient age was 45 years (range, 18-89 years) with 75.4% males. Majority presented with a single fracture (n = 50, 72.5%), and 38 patients (55.1%) had open fractures. Small finger was the most affected digit (n = 35, 37.6%). The median time to allow range of motion from surgery was 8.7 days (interquartile range, 0-32) with 32 days (interquartile range, 10-62) for unrestricted use of the hand. Thirty-five patients (50.7%) were allowed controlled motion from the first postoperative day. One patient had loss of reduction requiring reintervention for hardware removal, and 1 patient had superficial skin infection managed with oral antibiotics. Our findings indicate that the IM screw provides reliable fixation for a wide variety of fracture patterns with a low complication rate and offers early return to functional use.

Intramedullary Screw Fixation of Proximal Phalangeal Fractures: Short- to Medium-term Outcomes.

Intramedullary screw fixation of phalangeal and metacarpal fractures has gained popularity as a method of providing rigid internal fixation with minimum tendon disturbance, allowing early mobilization and rehabilitation. Despite this, the literature on outcomes using this technique is limited. Thus, the aim of this study was to assess the short-term to medium-term outcomes of intramedullary screw fixation for proximal phalangeal fracture fixation in an Australian setting. A retrospective analysis of consecutive patients with a fracture(s) of the proximal phalanx fixated using intramedullary screws between January 2020 and March 2023 was conducted via telehealth. Forty-six phalangeal fractures from 37 patients were included in this study. Mean Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score of 6.2 (range: 0-61.4, median: 0), mean pain visual analogue scale score of 1.8 (range: 1-7, median: 1), and mean total active motion of 231° (range: 132-282) were noted. A total of 4.4% of fractures sustained a major complication, and 94.6% of patients reported willingness to undergo intramedullary screw fixation again. This study concurs with the prior literature that intramedullary screw fixation is a safe and effective method of stabilizing extra-articular proximal phalangeal fractures in the short to medium term. Superior clinical outcomes, as well as cost-effectiveness and time-effectiveness, render it a viable alternative to plate fixation in this setting.

Comparison of Intramedullary Screw Fixation, Plating, and K-Wires for Metacarpal Fracture Fixation: A Meta-Analysis.

Metacarpal fractures are common injuries with multiple options for fixation. Our purpose was to compare outcomes in metacarpal fractures treated with intramedullary screw fixation (IMF), Kirschner wires (K-wires), or plating. A systematic literature review using the MEDLINE database was performed for studies investigating metacarpal fractures treated with IMF, plating, or K-wires. We identified 34 studies (9 IMF, 8 plating, 17 K-wires). A meta-analysis using both mixed and fixed effects models was performed. Outcome measures included mean Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) scores, total active motion (TAM), grip strength, time to radiographic healing, and rates of infection and reoperation. Patients with IMF had significantly lower DASH scores (0.6 [95% confidence interval [CI], 0.2-1.0]) compared with K-wires (7.4 [4.8-9.9]) and plating (9.8 [5.3-14.3]). Intramedullary screw fixation also had significantly lower rates of reoperation (4%, [2%-7%]), compared with K-wires (11% [7%-16%]) and plating (11% [0.07-0.17]). Grip strength was significantly higher in IMF (104.4% [97.0-111.8]) compared with K-wires (88.5%, [88.3-88.7]) and plating (90.3%, [85.4-95.2]). Mean odds ratio time was similar between IMF (21.0 minutes [10.4-31.6]) and K-wires (20.8 minutes [14.0-27.6]), but both were shorter compared with plating (52.6 minutes [33.1-72.1]). There were no statistically significant differences in time to radiographic healing, TAM, or rates of reoperation or infection. This meta-analysis compared the outcomes of metacarpal fixation with IMF, K-wires, or plating. Intramedullary screw fixation provided statistically significant lower DASH scores, higher grip strength, and lower rates of reoperation, suggesting that it is a comparable method of fixation to K-wires and plating for metacarpal fractures.

Outcomes and Complications of Intramedullary Metacarpal Fixation.

Metacarpal fractures are common orthopedic injuries with potentially debilitating outcomes. Ideal surgical treatment remains a topic of debate, with intramedullary fixation becoming popular as a technique to allow for earlier mobilization with few reported complications. The aim of this study was to report observed outcomes and complications of intramedullary metacarpal fixation using the ExsoMed INnate metacarpal nail. A retrospective chart review of 37 patients with 44 metacarpals treated with the ExsoMed INnate between July 2020 and December 2021 by a single fellowship-trained hand surgeon at a single level 1 trauma center was performed. Variables recorded included both patient and injury demographics, surgical complications, and postoperative outcomes. We also measured metacarpal isthmus diameter of the second to fifth metacarpals on all patients to determine the intramedullary canal diameter to assist in implant size selection. Average follow-up was 5.84 weeks with average time to radiographic healing of 5.5 weeks, and time to full activity 6.32 weeks. The mean postsurgical active total arc of motion was 250°, while passive total arc of motion was 259.74°. A total of 10 complications (22%) were identified, including 4 bent screws which occurred as a result of a punching event postoperatively. Intramedullary fixation of metacarpal fractures using the ExsoMed INnate metacarpal nail has shown to preserve range of motion and quick return to full activity, with a low rate of major complications. Our study highlights the potential major complication of the bent intramedullary screw and its association with an initial punching mechanism.

Conservative treatment versus transverse pinning in fifth metacarpal neck fractures in active adults: a randomized controlled trial.

Compare two simple ways for treating boxer's fractures in active adults; conservative management by ulnar gutter slab and transverse pinning in fixation of fifth metacarpal's neck fracture regarding union, functional outcomes, and complications. Ninety patients with fifth metacarpals' neck fractures with palmar angulation (30-70°) were managed either conservatively by an ulnar gutter slab or surgically by transverse pinning technique from January 2020 to December 2021. Only 84 patients completed a 1-year follow-up. Patients with old, open, or mal-rotated fractures were excluded. The block-randomization method was used to create equal groups. Patients were evaluated clinically and radiologically every 2-3 weeks until union, then at 6 and 12 months. Functional assessment at the final visit was done using the quick DASH score, total active motion (TAM), and total Active Flexion (TAF). The mean radiological union time for the conservative group in this study was 7.76 weeks, while for the transverse pinning group, it was 7.38 weeks. There was no statistically significant difference between the two techniques regarding union rates and functional outcomes. All patients returned to their pre-injury jobs and level of activity. Both conservative management in ulnar gutter slab and percutaneous transverse pinning are considered effective methods in the treatment of simple extra-articular fifth metacarpal neck fractures with angulation between 30 and 70 degrees (AO: 77 A3.1). The functional and radiological results using both methods were satisfactory and statistically comparable.

Intramedullary Screw Fixation of Metacarpal and Phalangeal Fractures.

Metacarpal and phalangeal fractures are the second and third most common hand and wrist fractures seen in the emergency department. There are a multitude of operative fixation methods for metacarpal and phalangeal fractures, including closed reduction percutaneous pinning, open reduction internal fixation, external fixation, and intramedullary screw fixation. Although intramedullary fixation is a relatively new surgical technique, it is gaining in popularity as it allows patients to resume range of motion early in the postoperative period with excellent clinical outcomes.

Biomechanical study of the fixation ability of the dorsal and volar locking plate for transverse metacarpal neck fractures.

Metacarpal neck fracture is one of the most common types of hand fractures; the literature suggests that applying a bone plate on the dorsal side provides higher fixation strength than that provided by other fixation methods. However, bone plate fixation on the dorsal side may result in postoperative tendon adhesion. So far, no studies have investigated the fixation of metacarpal neck fractures on the volar side by using a bone plate. The objective of this study was to investigate the differences in the fixation results between bone plate fixation on the dorsal side and bone plate fixation on the volar side of the metacarpal in the case of a metacarpal neck fracture. A saw blade was used to create a transverse metacarpal neck fracture on 14 artificial metacarpal bone specimens. The specimens were divided into 2 groups depending on the fixation method: a volar locking plate (VLP) group and a dorsal locking plate (DLP) group. All specimens were subjected to a cantilever bending test on a material testing system, and a force-displacement curve was used to measure the yield force and stiffness, which served as an indicator of the fixation ability of the 2 fracture fixation methods. For the experimental results, the Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare the fixation abilities of the 2 fixation methods. In terms of yield force, the DLP group (266.9 ± 68.3 N) scored significantly higher than the VLP group (32.6 ± 2.7 N) (P < .05); expressed in terms of median, the DLP group scored 8.2 times higher than the VLP group. Similarly, in terms of stiffness, the DLP group (69.0 ± 13.4 N/mm, median ± interquartile range) scored significantly higher than the VLP group (12.9 ± 1.4 N/mm) (P < .05); expressed in terms of median, the DLP group scored 5.3 times higher than the VLP group. The fixation strength of volar bone plates is only about one-third of that of dorsal bone plates.

Translated article] Closed reduction and intramedullary fixation of fifth metacarpal neck fractures: Retrograde vs. anterograde technique. Prospective study

IntroductionThe fifth metacarpal fracture is a frequent pathology that can cause deformity and functional impairment for the adequate grip of the hand. Reintegration into daily or working activities is related to the treatment received and rehabilitation. In fractures of the neck of the fifth metacarpal, internal fixation with a Kirschner's wire is a conventional treatment method with variants that affect its outcome. Aim of the studyTo compare the functional and clinical results of the treatment of fifth metacarpal fracture with the use of retrograde vs. antegrade Kirschner wires. Material and methodsComparative, longitudinal, prospective study at a third-level trauma centre in patients with a fifth metacarpal neck fracture, with clinical, radiographic and Quick DASH scale follow-up at the 3rd, 6th, and 8th postoperative week. ResultsSixty patients were included (58 men, 2 women), age of 29.63±10.15 years, with a fifth metacarpal fracture, treated by closed reduction and stabilisation with a Kirschner wire. The antegrade approach showed a metacarpophalangeal flexion range at 8 weeks of 89.11° (p<0.001; 95% CI [−26.81; −11.42]), a DASH scale value of 18.17 (p<0.001; 95% CI [23.45; 39.12]), and an average of 27.35 days to return to work (p=0.002; 95% CI [16.22; 62.14]), compared with the retrograde approach. ConclusionStabilisation with antegrade Kirschner wire showed superior functional results, and metacarpophalangeal range of motion, compared to those operated via retrograde approach.

Intramedullary fixation of refractory metacarpal stress fracture in a professional boxer

Metacarpal stress fractures, although rare in the general population, are not uncommon in high performance athletes and may be seen in individuals with chronic pain associated with sports activity and with no history of acute trauma. Stress fracture fixation in skeletal long bones with different methods and implants have been discussed in the literature, both for patients who had conservative treatment failure and prophylactically. We describe the use of intramedullary cannulated screw fixation for the treatment of a 26-year-old professional boxer who complained of hand pain and swelling with 18months evolution. After 30days of post-operative evolution, the patient had no pain on palpation of the metacarpal base and, after three months, he was back to boxing. This is a level V evidence study. Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report and accompanying images.

Cost Analysis of Intramedullary Screw versus Plate Osteosynthesis for Phalangeal and Metacarpal Fractures: An Observational Study.

Background: To compare the observed healthcare and societal costs of intramedullary screw (IMS) and plate fixation of extra-articular metacarpal and phalangeal fractures in a contemporary Australian context. Methods: A retrospective analysis, based on previously published data, was performed utilising information from Australian public and private hospitals, the Medicare Benefits Schedule (MBS) and the Australian Bureau of Statistics. Results: Plate fixation demonstrated longer surgical lengths (32 minutes, compared to 25 minutes), greater hardware costs (AUD 1,088 vs. AUD 355), more extended follow-up requirements (6.3 months, compared to 5 months) and higher rates of subsequent hardware removal (24% compared to 4.6%), resulting in an increased healthcare expenditure of AUD 1,519.41 in the public system, and AUD 1,698.59 in the private sector. Wage losses were estimated at AUD 15,515.78 when the fracture cohort is fixed by a plate, and AUD 13,542.43 when using an IMS - a differential of AUD 1,973.35. Conclusions: There is a substantial saving to both the health system and the patient when using IMS fixation over dorsal plating for the fixation of extra-articular metacarpal and phalangeal fractures. Level of Evidence: Level III (Cost Utility).

Complications Following Intramedullary Screw Fixation for Metacarpal Fractures: A Systematic Review

There has been a recent increase in the use of intramedullary screws (IMS) for the surgical treatment of metacarpal fractures. While IMS fixation has been shown to produce excellent functional outcomes, postoperative complications have yet to be fully explored in a comprehensive way. This systematic review quantified the incidence, treatment, and results of complications following IMS fixation for metacarpal fractures. A systematic review was performed using PubMed, Cochrane Central, EBSCO, and EMBASE databases. All clinical studies that documented IMS complications following metacarpal fracture fixation were included. Descriptive statistics were analyzed for all available data. Twenty-six studies were included: 2 randomized trials, 4 cohort studies, 19 case series, and 1 case report. Among the 1,014 fractures studied, 47 complications were reported across all studies (4.6%). Stiffness was the most common, followed by extension lag, loss of reduction, shortening, and complex regional pain syndrome. Other complications included screw fracture, bending, and migration; early-onset arthrosis; infection; tendon adhesion; hypertrophic scar; hematoma; and nickel allergy. Eighteen of the 47 (38%) patients with complications underwent revision surgery. Complications following IMS fixation of metacarpal fractures are relatively uncommon. Therapeutic IV.

Intramedullary Metacarpal Fracture Fixation: A Biomechanical Study of Screw Diameter and Comparison With Intramedullary Wire Stabilization

Interest in intramedullary metacarpal fracture fixation (IMFF) with screws is increasing. However, the optimal screw diameter for fracture fixation is not yet established. In theory, larger screws should be more stable, but there is concern about long-term sequelae of larger metacarpal head defects and extensor mechanism injury created during insertion as well as implant cost. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to compare different diameter screws for IMFF to a popular and more cost-effective alternative of intramedullary wiring. Thirty-two cadaveric metacarpals were used in a transverse metacarpal shaft fracture model. Treatment groups consisted of IMFF with 3.0× 60 mm, 3.5 x 60 mm, and 4.5 x 60 mm screws as well as 4 1.1-mm intramedullary wires. Cyclic cantilever bending was performed with the metacarpals mounted at 45° to simulate physiologic loading. Cyclical loading at 10, 20, and 30 N was performed to determine fracture displacement, stiffness, and ultimate force. At 10, 20, and 30 N of cyclical loading, all screw diameters tested provided similar stability as measured by fracture displacement and were superior to the wire group. However, ultimate force under load to failure testing was similar between the 3.5- and 4.5-mm screws and superior to 3.0-mm screws and wires. For IMFF, 3.0, 3.5, and 4.5-mm diameter screws provide adequate stability for early active motion and are superior to wires. When comparing the different screw diameters, 3.5- and 4.5-mm diameter screws offer similar construct stability and strength superior to the 3.0-mm diameter screw. Therefore, to minimize metacarpal head morbidity, smaller screw diameters may be preferable. This study suggests that IMFF with screws is biomechanically superior to wires in cantilever bending strength in the transverse fracture model. However, smaller screws may be sufficient to permit early active motion while minimizing metacarpal head morbidity.

Intramedullary Headless Screw Fixation for Metacarpal Fractures - Technical Tips.

Metacarpal fractures are a common injury in the hand. When surgical intervention is indicated, there are multiple approaches and techniques of fixation. Intramedullary fixation has become an increasingly versatile method of fixation. The limited dissection needed for its insertion, rotational stability provided by the isthmic fit and lack of requisite hardware removal are improvements over conventional K-wire or plate fixation techniques. Multiple outcome studies have confirmed its safety and effectiveness. In this technical note, we provide some tips that can help surgeons considering intramedullary headless screw fixation of metacarpal fractures. Level of Evidence: Level V (Therapeutic).

Effects of Early Period Physical Therapy and Ergotherapy Applications on Daily Activity Levels After Open Reduction and Internal Fixation in Metacarpal Fractures

Effects of Early Period Physical Therapy and Ergotherapy Applications on Daily Activity Levels After Open Reduction and Internal Fixation in Metacarpal Fractures

Comparative Bending Strength of Metacarpal Neck Fractures Fixed with Two Types of Intramedullary Screws.

Intramedullary (IM) screw fixation of metacarpal fractures is a technique, which has gained in popularity owing to its simplicity, speedy rehabilitation, and good functional outcomes. A new, larger diameter, non-compression screw designed specifically for IM metacarpal fixation was recently introduced which could provide better fracture stability and reduce the risk of hardware failure. Our goal was to evaluate the strength of this screw compared to a first-generation screw. This mechanical study was designed to compare a 4.5 mm metacarpal headless screw (MCHS) to data from our prior research evaluating a 3.0 mm headless screw (HS). Accordingly, we used identical bone models, testing constructs, equipment, and protocols. A metacarpal neck osteotomy was created in 10 Sawbones models. A 4.5 mm x 50 mm MCHS was inserted retrograde to stabilize the fracture. Flexion bending strength was measured through a cable tension construct on a materials testing machine. Failure mechanism and strength was recorded and compared to data with a 3.0 mm screw construct. Eight models failed by bending of the intramedullary screw. Two models failed by rotation of the metacarpal head. Failure occurred at an average of 539 N (Range 315 - 735 N). The MCHS demonstrated a significantly greater load to failure compared to the previously studied 3.0 mm HS at 215 N (P<0.05). A larger, 4.5 mm metacarpal-specific headless screw is more than twice as strong as a 3.0 mm diameter screw in a metacarpal neck fracture model.

Quantifying the Impact of COVID-19 on Hand and Wrist Surgery Procedural Volume: A National Analysis of 381,046 Cases

The purpose of this study is to quantify and describe the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on procedural volume trends in hand and wrist surgery in 2020 through early 2022 at multiple centers. In this retrospective comparative study, a real-time, national, federated research database was utilized to identify patients of interest from 56 healthcare organizations across the United States. Patients were queried from March 1, 2018, through February 28, 2022. Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes were chosen using the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education's Hand Fellowship procedure requirements. Common hand and wrist surgeries exhibited substantial fluctuations in procedural volume per healthcare organization during the COVID-19 pandemic. Time periods with considerable procedural volume decreases corresponded with surges of increased COVID-19 caseloads and the emergence of COVID-19 variants. Periods of procedural volume increase occurred in summer 2020 as well as immediately following distribution of the COVID-19 vaccine to the general public. Fixation of metacarpal fracture, fixation of phalangeal fracture, tendon transfer, flexor tendon repair, and extensor tendon repair consistently showed decreased volumes over the study period. In contrast, ulnar nerve decompression was the only procedure to experience a statistically significant increase in volume over an entire year (2021) as compared to before the pandemic. Major milestones of the COVID-19 pandemic correlated with fluctuations in the number of hand and wrist procedures performed across the United States. Future studies should seek to evaluate the impact of patient backlogs and individual procedure fluctuations on financial impacts, patient outcomes, and orthopaedic trainee experience.

Threaded intramedullary headless nail fixation for fractures requiring carpometacarpal stabilization

Carpometacarpal (CMC) fracture-dislocations are uncommon hand injuries, with few studies available regarding their treatment. The current operative treatment options include fixation with K-wires, mini-screws, or plates, though there is no standardized approach because of varying injury patterns and complications associated with each device. The INnate™ threaded intramedullary nail is a relatively novel treatment option that has shown promise in metacarpal fracture fixation by facilitating faster mobilization and recovery with enhanced rotational stability and no compression to prevent fracture displacement and shortening. This study assesses the efficacy of the INnate™ nail for fixation of CMC fracture-dislocations of the second through fifth joints.Nine patients with fourteen CMC fracture-dislocations treated with the INnate™ nail at the University Medical Center between 2019 and 2021 were enrolled in the study. We evaluated postoperative outcomes in terms of pain, total active range of motion (TAM), and return to normal activities.Of the nine patients, seven returned for follow-up. The average time to radiographic union was 11.5 weeks. At final follow-up, no patient reported pain (n = 6). Four patients had 100% TAM, 1 had 95% TAM, and 1 had 25% TAM. The average percentage of normal activity resumed was 84.0% (n = 5). No significant complications were reported. One patient had a dorsal spanning plate; hence, we were unable to record outcomes measures regarding the CMC injury. An additional patient had diminished ROM of the injured hand, but his last follow-up was only 1 month postop.Our pilot data overall suggest that the INnate™ threaded intramedullary nail has the potential to improve treatment algorithms for CMC fracture-dislocations.