Mental Health Care Utilization Research Articles

Factors Associated with Mental Health Care among Adolescents in Southern California.

Mental health care is critical to improving mental health but factors associated with student utilization are poorly understood. Data were from high school students (N = 2933; mean age = 15.7 ± .6) enrolled in a California cohort. We examined associations of sociodemographic factors, substance use, and mental health symptoms at baseline (Fall 2021) with mental health care at follow-up (Spring 2022). At follow-up, 7.7% of students reported out-of-school therapy, and 16.0% reported in-school counseling. Generally, therapy was more common for female and gender minority (vs male), some sexual minority youth (vs heterosexual), black, non-Hispanic white, and multi-ethnic (vs Asian), and English language speakers. Higher socioeconomic status was associated with greater use of out-of-school therapy, but not in-school counseling. Students with clinical levels of mental health symptoms, or alcohol or e-cigarette use had greater odds of mental health care (ORs = 1.42-2.61;ps <.05), though utilization was less than 20% for out-of-school therapy and less than 30% for in-school counseling among these students. Mental health care is underutilized, and disproportionately used by certain student sub-groups. Findings indicate a need to increase mental health care utilization in- and out-of-school.

Patient-Reported Outcomes Among Adults With Congenital Heart Disease in the Congenital Heart Initiative Registry

In the US, there are more than 1.5 million adults living with congenital heart disease (CHD). The Congenital Heart Initiative (CHI) is a digital, online, patient-empowered registry that was created to advance multicenter research and improve clinical care by gathering patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in adults with CHD. To report the initial findings of the PROs for adults with CHD from the first 3 years of the CHI. The CHI was launched nationally on December 7, 2020, as an observational cohort (survey) study. Data were collected virtually through December 31, 2023, and stored on Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act-compliant cloud-based servers with restricted access. Adults with CHD were recruited through email, social media, general advertising through advocacy organizations, and targeted outreach (telephone and in-clinic recruitment) by clinical centers. Demographics and validated survey tools on quality of life, mental health, physical activity, and health care utilization were collected at baseline and every 4 months. Descriptive statistics were used to understand the associations between various factors, including the complexity of heart defects, physical activity levels, mental health comorbidities, and socioeconomic and health care access variables. All categorical variables were analyzed using χ2 or Fischer exact test as appropriate. By December 31, 2023, the CHI had enrolled 4558 participants (2530 female [56%]) with a mean (SD) age of 38.5 (13.9) years, representing all 50 states. Approximately 88% of participants (3998 participants) completed at least 1 electronic visit as of December 31, 2023. The most prevalent CHD anatomy included tetralogy of Fallot (883 participants [22%]), transposition of great arteries (452 participants [11%]), and coarctation of the aorta (429 participants [11%]). Approximately 88% of participants (3998 participants) reported at least 1 comorbidity, with arrhythmia (1300 participants [33%]) as the most common cardiac comorbidity and mood disorder (1326 participants [35%]) as the most common noncardiac comorbidity. Among female participants, 45% (1147 participants) reported having had a pregnancy, with 38% (967 participants) resulting in biological children. Participants with complex CHD were less likely than those with moderate CHD to meet recommended physical activity guidelines (χ22 = 15.9; n = 3320; P < .001), a factor that was more pronounced among female participants. Overall health-related quality of life was rated as good or better by 84% of participants who completed the quality of life PROs (2882 participants), with no difference by CHD complexity. In this cohort study of adults living with CHD, many patients reported mood disorders, but most reported good health-related quality of life. The CHI, the largest registry of adults with CHD, is poised to facilitate multicenter research with the goal of improving clinical outcomes for all adults with CHD.

Young adults, particularly young women, account for an increasingly large share of Dutch mental healthcare expenditure over the period between 2015 and 2021.

There is increasing concern over the mental distress of youth in recent years, which may impact mental healthcare utilisation. Here we aim to examine temporal patterns of mental healthcare expenditures in the Netherlands by age and sex in the period between 2015 and 2021. Comprehensive data from health insurers in the Netherlands at the 3-number postal code level were used for cluster weighted linear regressions to examine temporal patterns of mental healthcare expenditure by age group (18-34 vs 35-65). The same was done for medical specialist and general practitioner costs. Additionally, we examined interactions with gender, by adding the interaction between age, year and sex to the model. Mental healthcare costs for younger adults (18-34) were higher than those for older adults (35-65) at all time points (β = 0.22, 95%-CI = 0.19; 0.25). Furthermore there was an increase in the strength of the association between younger age and mental healthcare costs from β = 0.22 (95%-CI = 0.19; 0.25) in 2015 to β = 0.37 (95%-CI = 0.35; 0.40) in 2021 (p < 0.0001) and this was most evident in women (p < 0.0001). Younger age was associated with lower general practitioner costs at all time points, but this association weakened over time. Younger age was also associated with lower medical specialist costs, which did not weaken over time. Young adults, particularly young women, account for an increasing share of mental healthcare expenditure in the Netherlands. This suggests that mental distress in young people is increasingly met by a response from the medical system. To mitigate this trend a public mental health approach is needed.

Use of mobile applications and mental health services among veterans who received internet-connected tablets.

Among Veterans Health Administration (VHA) patients receiving internet-connected tablets, we examined (1) app usage, (2) clusters of commonly used apps and patient characteristics across clusters, and (3) the relationship between app clusters and mental health services. A survey was distributed to a national sample of VHA patients (n = 5449) within 6 months of tablet receipt. Self-reported app use was clustered with agglomerative hierarchical clustering. Survey data were combined with electronic health record data that included sociodemographics and mental health care utilization during the 6 months following survey completion. Differences in patient characteristics by cluster were examined using chi-square tests. A multivariable model assessed prediction of mental health services across app clusters. Among 1664 patients with complete survey and health care utilization data, the majority (74%) reported using at least 1 app. The most used apps were for video visits (60%) and VA's patient portal (53%). Cluster analysis revealed 5 distinct groups reflecting app usage: Patient Portal (n = 685, 41%), Video Connection (n = 319, 19%), Treatment Companion (n = 166, 10%), Self-Management (n = 85, 5%), and Non-App Group (n = 409, 25%). Cluster characteristics varied, and those in the Patient Portal Group (adjusted odds ratio = 1.64; 95% CI = 1.15-2.32) and Video Connection Group (adjusted odds ratio = 1.52; 95% CI = 1.02-2.26) were more likely to have a mental health visit in the 6 months after survey completion when compared to the Non-App Group (P < .05). Tablet provision supports opportunities to use apps for multiple health management tasks, and app use clusters vary across patient characteristics and health care utilization. Patients most commonly used apps to connect with their care team, and use of some apps and app combinations may improve engagement with mental health services.

Factors associated with mental healthcare utilization among United States military personnel with posttraumatic stress disorder or depression symptoms

Introduction: Although posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and depression are prominent mental health conditions affecting United States service members, only a subset of individuals with these conditions utilize mental healthcare services. Identifying factors associated with mental healthcare utilization may elucidate military subgroups with unmet mental healthcare needs. Methods: Cross-sectional survey data from the 2019–2021 Millennium Cohort Study assessment were used to examine correlates of unmet mental healthcare needs among military personnel who screened positive for PTSD or depression symptoms (n=18,420) using modified Poisson regression models. Data analyses for this study were conducted between 2023 and 2024. Results: Approximately 32–43% of service members reported receiving any mental healthcare in the past 12 months. Hispanic and Asian or Pacific Islander personnel, and those with certain service characteristics (higher pay grade, recent deployment, experienced discrimination) had a lower likelihood of mental healthcare utilization. Female sex, greater symptom severity, experiencing bullying, and other psychosocial factors were associated with greater likelihood of mental healthcare utilization. Conclusions: One-third of service members with PTSD or depression symptoms reported any mental healthcare use, highlighting the need to identify factors that may impede or delay treatment. Racial and ethnic disparities in treatment utilization persist as do differences in utilization by military characteristics. Further research and initiatives are necessary to identify potential service-specific or cultural barriers and provide equitable quality and access to needed mental health services within the Military Health System.

Applying the theoretical domains framework to identify determinants to mental healthcare use among older African Americans with type 2 diabetes: a qualitative study

ObjectivesThere is a paucity of research focused on enhancing access to mental healthcare for older African Americans with type 2 diabetes (T2D), who may be at risk for or living...

International comparison of hospitalizations and emergency department visits related to mental health conditions across high-income countries before and during the COVID-19 pandemic.

To explore variation in rates of acute care utilization for mental health conditions, including hospitalizations and emergency department (ED) visits, across high-income countries before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Administrative patient-level data between 2017 and 2020 of eight high-income countries: Canada, England, Finland, France, New Zealand, Spain, Switzerland, and the United States (US). Multi-country retrospective observational study using a federated data approach that evaluated age-sex standardized rates of hospitalizations and ED visits for mental health conditions. There was significant variation in rates of acute mental health care utilization across countries. Among the subset of four countries with both hospitalization and ED data, the US had the highest pre-COVID-19 combined average annual acute care rate of 1613 episodes/100,000 people (95% CI: 1428, 1797). Finland had the lowest rate of 776 (686, 866). When examining hospitalization rates only, France had the highest rate of inpatient hospitalizations of 988/100,000 (95% CI 858, 1118) while Spain had the lowest at 87/100,000 (95% CI 76, 99). For ED rates for mental health conditions, the US had the highest rate of 958/100,000 (95% CI 861, 1055) while France had the lowest rate with 241/100,000 (95% CI 216, 265). Notable shifts coinciding with the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic were observed including a substitution of care setting in the US from ED to inpatient care, and overall declines in acute care utilization in Canada and France. The study underscores the importance of understanding and addressing variation in acute care utilization for mental health conditions, including the differential effect of COVID-19, across different health care systems. Further research is needed to elucidate the extent to which factors such as workforce capacity, access barriers, financial incentives, COVID-19 preparedness, and community-based care may contribute to these variations. Approximately one billion people globally live with a mental health condition, with significant consequences for individuals and societies. Rates of mental health diagnoses vary across high-income countries, with substantial differences in access to effective care. The COVID-19 pandemic has exacerbated mental health challenges globally, with varying impacts across countries. This study provides a comprehensive international comparison of hospitalization and emergency department visit rates for mental health conditions across eight high-income countries. It highlights significant variations in acute care utilization patterns, particularly in countries that are more likely to care for people with mental health conditions in emergency departments rather than inpatient facilities The study identifies temporal and cross-country differences in acute care management of mental health conditions coinciding with the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic.

The Undergraduate Engineering Mental Health Help‐Seeking Instrument (UE‐MH‐HSI): Development and validity evidence

AbstractBackgroundUndergraduate engineering students experiencing distress are less likely than peers to ask for professional help. A population‐specific instrument to facilitate the identification of factors that influence mental healthcare utilization could guide development and testing of interventions to increase help seeking.PurposeWe used mixed methods guided by the Integrated Behavioral Model (IBM) to develop and evaluate the Undergraduate Engineering Mental Health Help‐Seeking Instrument (UE‐MH‐HSI).MethodFirst, we adapted existing measures of mental health help‐seeking intention and mechanisms (i.e., attitudes, perceived norm: injunctive, perceived norm: descriptive, personal agency: autonomy, personal agency: capacity). Second, we coded qualitative interviews (N = 33) to create population‐specific mental health help‐seeking belief measures (i.e., outcome beliefs, experiential beliefs, beliefs about others' expectations, beliefs about others' behavior, beliefs about barriers and facilitators). Third, we tested the psychometric properties using data from 596 undergraduate engineering students at a historically White, research‐focused institution in southern United States.ResultsPsychometric analyses indicated that (1) help‐seeking mechanism and intention measures demonstrated unidimensionality, internal consistency, construct replicability, and sufficient variability; (2) mechanism measures demonstrated criterion evidence of validity; and (3) most items within the belief measures demonstrated sufficient variability and convergent evidence of validity.ConclusionsThe UE‐MH‐HSI is an evidence‐based tool for investigating mental health help‐seeking factors and their relationship to help‐seeking behavior, well‐being, academic success, and engineering identity formation. Guidelines for use are provided.

Changing Attitudes about Mental Health Stigma in Israel during the COVID-19 Period: A Potential Positive Effect of the Pandemic

As well as affecting physical health, COVID-19 can impact mental health. While many studies have examined stigma related to having COVID-19, almost none have examined the larger issue of attitudes toward mental health and stigma since the pandemic began. This study examined public/external mental health stigma among Israelis after the COVID-19 outbreak, including whether there were changes to it. Surveys were administered to a sample of 1,099 Israelis aged 18–55 and multivariate analyses were performed. Israelis were found to have faced increased mental health risks since the COVID-19 outbreak and extensive mental health stigma was found among many of them. However, the stigma was reduced in later months as well as during lockdown periods. Variations in stigma were found by types of stigma and mental health illness, as well as by sociodemographic groups. COVID-19 can negatively impact mental health and appropriate mental healthcare utilization, although there may be positive effects as well. A crisis such as COVID-19 which began as a physical threat can cause society to reconsider how it views mental health, with important and potentially positive implications in the long term, and potential lessons learned for future crises. Interventions are needed, especially when appropriately tailored for vulnerable populations.

The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on mental health care utilization among people living with HIV: A real-world data study.

The COVID-19 pandemic has profoundly impacted mental health worldwide, particularly among vulnerable populations such as people living with HIV (PLWH). However, large-scale, real-world data on mental health care utilization and associated factors among PLWH remain limited. This study leveraged electronic health records (EHR) and Basics survey data from the All of Us program to explore mental health care utilization and associated factors among PLWH during the COVID-19 pandemic. Using a retrospective cohort design, we identified and included 4,575 PLWH through computational phenotyping based on relevant Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership (OMOP) Common Data Model (CDM) concept sets from the All of Us program between March 2018 and March 2022. Mental health care utilization was measured using the yearly count of mental health care visits over this period. The pattern of mental health care utilization was compared between pre-pandemic (2018-2020) and during the pandemic (2020-2022). Incidence rate ratios (IRR) from the Poisson generalized linear mixed models (GLMM) were used to examine associations between mental health care utilization, history of COVID-19 infection, demographic factors, pre-existing chronic conditions (e.g., hypertension, diabetes), and socioeconomic status. Among 4,575 PLWH, the annual number of mental health care visits decreased significantly during the pandemic period (March 2020 - March 2022) compared to the pre-pandemic period (March 2018 - February 2020) (IRR = 0.89, p < 0.001). The Poisson regression analysis found that a history of COVID-19 infection was associated with a higher number of mental health care visits (IRR = 1.35, p < 0.001). Middle-aged groups with participants aged 30-39 (IRR= 2.35, p = 0.002), 40-49 (IRR= 3.49, p < 0.001), and 50-64 (IRR= 2.07, p = 0.004) had significantly higher visit numbers compared to the youngest group (18-29 years). Black or African American participants were less likely to have visits compared to White participants (IRR = 0.71, p = 0.002). Medicaid health insurance was associated with an increase (IRR = 1.29, p = 0.007), while employer- or union-sponsored insurance was associated with a decrease in mental health care utilization (IRR = 0.54, p < 0.001, p < 0.001). Pre-existing comorbidities greatly increased the number of mental health care visits (one comorbidity: IRR = 5.49, two or more: IRR = 10.4, p < 0.001). Our study reveals a significant decrease in mental health care utilization and the diverse experiences of mental healthcare among PLWH during the COVID-19 pandemic. These findings underscore the importance of addressing disparities in mental health care access, particularly during public health emergencies, and suggest the need for tailored interventions to meet the mental health care needs of PLWH.

Abstract B155: “Quite devastating, traumatic and lonely”: The mental health experiences of Hispanic/Latino rectal cancer patients

Abstract Background: Numerous studies have shown that emotional distress increases after a cancer diagnosis. Psycho-oncology literature also indicates that Hispanic/Latino patients are less likely to receive mental health care after being diagnosed, placing them at risk of poor psychological adjustment. The purpose of this qualitative analysis was to explore how Hispanic/Latino adults experience their rectal cancer journey, how their needs change between receiving their initial diagnosis and undergoing treatment, and what can be done to help process difficult emotions at each phase. Methods: We partnered with Visión y Compromiso, a network of promotores (Spanish-speaking community health workers), to recruit 20 Hispanic/Latino rectal cancer patients and/or their caregivers in California's Bay Area and Central Valley. Semi-structured interviews were conducted in-person or virtually; participants could also choose their preferred language. Using reflexive data analysis, themes were developed and refined iteratively amongst a diverse team of researchers. Results: We identified three main themes. The first is the reactions experienced during initial diagnosis and what triggered these emotions. Patients reported experiencing fear, going blank, and feeling traumatized from the hurried and emotionally distant delivery of their diagnosis, thinking they’re going to die, and contemplating their quality of life. The second theme focused on what emotions were felt during treatment and what caused the feelings. Patients conveyed feeling depressed, frustrated, and embarrassed during their treatment due to pain, treatment difficulties, and poor communication from their providers. Treatment difficulties for this population included being racially profiled, fear of losing insurance coverage, and mounting hospital and transportation costs. Lastly, patients reported what helped them cope and/or what could help others. Religion/faith and support from caregivers were mentioned as coping strategies with the caveat that caregiver burnout is a risk. Better communication from the treatment team was an actionable recommendation. Examples of this included providers being more sensitive when conveying the initial diagnosis, providers explaining complex concepts in layman’s terms during the treatment process and having a Spanish translator available at each phase. Conclusion: Hispanic/Latino rectal cancer patients endure emotional distress at multiple stages of their cancer journey; tailored interventions may mitigate this psychological burden. Previous studies have shown that promotores can help reduce health disparities within the Hispanic/Latino population. In the context of our results, promotores could connect cancer patients to resources to address or cope with stressors, which may help bridge the gap in mental health care access and utilization. Future interventions with promotores should be explored as a way to provide culturally and linguistically concordant emotional support for patients and their caregivers at each step of the cancer journey. Citation Format: Zaria N. Cosby, Eleanor Brown, Julian P. Howland, Lucas K. Carpenter, Min Young Kim, Kristen M. Davis-Lopez, Patricia Castañeda, Maria Gonzalez, Miriam T. Hernandez, Ysabel Duron, Gladys M. Rodriguez, Sandra S. Zaky, Arden M. Morris, Aaron J. Dawes. “Quite devastating, traumatic and lonely”: The mental health experiences of Hispanic/Latino rectal cancer patients [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 17th AACR Conference on the Science of Cancer Health Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved; 2024 Sep 21-24; Los Angeles, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2024;33(9 Suppl):Abstract nr B155.

Language ability and virtual mental healthcare utilisation among immigrant and refugee youth: a population-based cohort study

Background and objectivesThe widespread adoption of virtual care during the pandemic may not have been uniform across populations, including among paediatric immigrants and refugees. We sought to examine the association...

Predicting Mental Health Care Enrollment and Treatment Uptake among Newly Arrived Refugees in U.S. Resettlement Programs.

This article examines variables that predict mental health care enrollment and engagement among refugees. The authors explore a mental health care model designed to identify mental health needs early among refugee arrivals that may interfere with adjustment and overall health outcomes using data from a Midwest refugee resettlement program. Using ecological models of mental distress and theories on help-seeking behaviors, the authors used logistic and count regressions to predict enrollment in mental health care services and utilization rates. Gender, nationality, and presenting problems were significant predictors of enrollment and length of engagement in services. The findings provide guidance to practitioners and resettlement agencies on refugee mental health and opportunities to increasing access and engagement in mental health care.

Help-Seeking Needs Related to Suicide Prevention for Individuals in Contact With Mental Health Services: ARapid Scoping Review.

Prior mental healthcare utilisation presents an important window of opportunity for providing suicide prevention interventions. To date, no reviews have consolidated the help-seeking needs of individuals in contact with mental health services. This warrants further attention given this group may have different needs for interventions compared with the general population who have not sought help previously. The purpose of this rapid scoping review was to summarise the available literature on help-seeking needs related to suicide prevention among individuals in contact with mental health services from healthcare settings. Cochrane rapid review and Joanna Briggs Institute scoping review methodologies were adapted, and databases, including MEDLINE, Scopus, CINAHL, PsycInfo and EMBASE, were searched. A total of 42 primary studies were included in analysis. Reported barriers and facilitators to help-seeking behaviours identified within studies were mapped onto the socio-ecological model. Barriers and facilitators identified included knowledge and attitudes towards healthcare utilisation, family and peer support, interactions with healthcare professionals, provision of holistic care, and the creation of a supportive atmosphere and safe space to promote open discussions of suicide-related concerns. The findings of this review offer valuable insights into areas for improvement in addressing help-seeking needs for individuals who are in contact with health services related to suicide prevention. The findings serve as a foundation for shaping mental health initiatives informing approaches and care delivery tailored towards individuals who are in contact with health services. The reported barriers and facilitators offer insights to inform the development of mental health support tools to enhance care and considerations for evaluations.

Predictors and patterns of suicidal ideation disclosures among American adults.

When experiencing suicidal thoughts, many individuals do not tell others, making it difficult to ensure suicide prevention resources reach those who need it. The current study utilizes a large sample of US adults who have experienced suicidal ideation in their lifetime (n = 1074) to examine predictors of disclosures. We also explore who participants disclose to and how helpful these disclosures are rated. A majority (n = 812, 75.6%) reported disclosing. Black and Hispanic participants were less likely to disclose than White participants. Those who were never married were more likely to disclose, as were those who have attempted suicide. Mental healthcare utilization and favorable attitudes toward mental healthcare were also positive predictors of disclosure. More participants reported disclosing to a personal connection (n = 532, 65.5%) than a mental health professional (n = 282, 34.8%). On average, most sources were rated as neither helpful nor harmful. The study highlights those who may be at a higher risk of experiencing suicidal thoughts but going unidentified. To increase helpfulness of disclosures, suicide prevention programming should emphasize training for laypersons and professionals on how to effectively respond when someone reveals that they are thinking of suicide.

Clinical benefits of self-guided mindfulness coach mobile app use for veterans with posttraumatic stress disorder: A pilot randomized control trial.

Mindfulness training can relieve posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms in military veterans and others but is inconsistently accessible. Self-guided mobile apps could improve access but their acceptability, feasibility, and benefits for veterans with PTSD have not been established. We conducted a pilot randomized trial of Mindfulness Coach (MC), a free, publicly available, trauma-informed mobile app tailored to veterans. U.S. veterans with PTSD (n = 173) were randomized to self-guided use of MC or waitlist control (WLC) with 8-week follow-up. Clinical outcomes were PTSD symptoms (PTSD Symptom Checklist-5), depression symptoms (Patient Health Questionnaire, nine item), and psychosocial functioning (Brief Inventory of Psychosocial Functioning). Primary analyses were intent-to-treat using linear mixed models with maximum likelihood estimation. App uptake, objective usage, and usability ratings measured acceptance and feasibility. Participants varied in age, gender, and ethnoracial identity; most reported recent mental health care utilization. Although study attrition was high (68.4% overall) due to participant dropout (treatment: 43.0%; control: 43.7%) and technical study issues (23% overall), diagnostic tests showed no evidence of bias due to missingness. Study completers (MC: n = 19; WLC: n = 37) showed medium effects on PTSD symptoms (b = -9.31, d = -0.69) and depression (b = -3.10, d = -0.52). Higher-intensity users showed greater benefits. App engagement trended lower for women and minoritized subpopulations. No changes were observed in psychosocial functioning. Usability and helpfulness ratings were favorable. Transdiagnostic clinical benefits indicate promise for MC as a public health resource for veterans with PTSD. Further study is warranted to confirm these benefits and ensure consistent engagement across subpopulations. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

Spatial and Socioeconomic Patterns of Mental Health and Healthcare Utilization in Cologne, Germany.

Children and adolescents are significantly tied to their family's socioeconomic position and living environment. Neighbourhood and the living environment have been identified as potential risk factors for mental disorders in this age group. The aim of the study was to investigate the distribution of mental and behavioural disorders (prevalence) and the provision of mental health services for children and adolescents aged 0-19 years in the city of Cologne. In particular, the study aimed to examine the association of these factors with area deprivation and the availability of mental health services covered by statutory health insurance. Finally, possible spatial variations in these aspects were analysed. Claims data of children and adolescents aged 0 to 19 years included in four statutory health insurance of the year 2021 were analysed. A deprivation index using data on the level of the ZIP code area was calculated. Analyses were carried out descriptively, using ordinary least squares (OLS) and geographically weighted regression (GWR). The prevalence of mental and behavioural disorders in children and adolescents varied across ZIP code areas, with higher rates in the northern, southern, and eastern parts of the city. The results indicated that the use of services by male children and adolescents with a prevalent diagnosis of mental and behavioural disorders was higher in areas with a higher density of healthcare providers. However, prevalence was on the whole lower in areas with a higher density of healthcare providers. In addition, the density of health care providers was higher in the city centre with comparatively lower deprivation. These results indicate inadequate access to care for children and young people outside the city centre. However, due to the heterogeneity of the population in these areas, this study provides only preliminary insights. Data with a finer geographic resolution are needed for further research in order to analyse the association further.

Psychological distress and mental health care utilization among lesbian, gay, and bisexual survivors of adolescent and young adult cancer.

Survivors of adolescent and young adult (AYA) cancer face significant psychological distress and encounter barriers accessing mental health care. However, limited research exists on psychological health among lesbian, gay, and bisexual (LGB) survivors of AYA cancer, particularly in comparison with heterosexual survivors and LGB individuals without a history of cancer. Using the National Health Interview Survey (2013-2018), we identified LGB survivors of AYA cancer, LGB individuals without a history of cancer, and heterosexual survivors of AYA cancer. Sociodemographic, chronic health conditions, modifiable factors (such as smoking and alcohol use), and psychological outcomes were assessed using chi-square tests. Logistic regression models, adjusted for survey weights, evaluated the odds of psychological distress by cancer status after accounting for covariates. Interactions between variables and cancer status were explored. The study comprised 145 LGB survivors, 1450 LGB individuals without a history of cancer, and 1450 heterosexual survivors. Compared to heterosexual survivors, LGB survivors were more likely to report severe distress (aOR = 2.26, p = 0.021) and had higher odds of reporting a mental health care visit (aOR = 1.98, p = 0.003). Odds of severe distress (aOR = 1.36, p = 0.36) and reporting a mental health care visit (aOR = 1.27, p = 0.29) were similar between LGB survivors and LGB individuals without a history of cancer. While 47.8% of LGB survivors reported moderate/severe distress, only 29.7% reported a mental health care visit. A history of cancer during the AYA years is associated higher odds of severe psychological distress among LGB survivors compared to heterosexual survivors. However, many LGB survivors with psychological distress have not accessed mental health care.

Sleep disturbances across two weeks predict future mental healthcare utilization.

Insufficient sleep costs the U.S. economy over $411 billion per year. However, most studies investigating economic costs of sleep rely on one-time measures of sleep, which may be prone to recall bias and cannot capture variability in sleep. To address these gaps, we examined how sleep metrics captured from daily sleep diaries predicted medical expenditures. Participants were 391 World Trade Center responders enrolled in the World Trade Center Health Program (mean age = 54.97 years, 89% men). At baseline, participants completed 14 days of self-reported sleep and stress measures. Mean sleep, variability in sleep, and a novel measure of sleep reactivity (i.e., how much people's sleep changes in response to daily stress) were used to predict the subsequent year's medical expenditures, covarying for age, race/ethnicity, sex, medical diagnoses, and body mass index. Mean sleep efficiency did not predict mental healthcare utilization. However, greater sleep efficiency reactivity to stress (b=$191.75, p=.027), sleep duration reactivity to stress (b=$206.33, p=.040), variability in sleep efficiency (b=$339.33, p=.002), variability in sleep duration (b=$260.87, p=.004), and quadratic mean sleep duration (b=$182.37, p=.001) all predicted greater mental healthcare expenditures. Together, these sleep variables explained 12% of the unique variance in mental healthcare expenditures. No sleep variables were significantly associated with physical healthcare expenditures. People with more irregular sleep, more sleep reactivity, and either short or long sleep engage in more mental healthcare utilization. It may be important to address these individuals' sleep problems to improve mental health and reduce healthcare costs.

Lifetime incidence and healthcare disparities in alopecia areata: A UK population-based cohort study.

Alopecia areata (AA) is an immune-mediated form of hair loss that can occur at any age, often with a significant mental health burden. We aimed to provide estimates of the lifetime incidence of AA, and the impacts on mental health, healthcare utilisation and work-related outcomes, assessing variation across major sociodemographic subgroups. AA cases were identified in primary care from the UK population-based Oxford-Royal College of General Practitioners Research and Surveillance Centre database (2009-2018). Lifetime incidence of AA was estimated at age 80 using modified time-to-event models with age as the timescale, overall and stratified by sex, ethnicity, deprivation, and geography. Mental health, healthcare utilisation and work-related outcomes were assessed in the two years after AA diagnosis compared to matched unaffected controls, and stratified by the same sociodemographic subgroups . 6,961 people developed AA during the study period. Overall lifetime incidence of AA was 2.11% (95% Confidence Interval [CI] 2.06, 2.16%). Females had a higher lifetime incidence 2.35% (95%CI 2.28, 2.43%) than males 1.88% (95%CI 1.81, 1.94%). Lifetime incidence was higher in those of Asian ethnicity 5.87% (95%CI 5.51, 6.24), other 4.47% (95%CI 3.63, 5.31), mixed 4.44% (95%CI 3.50, 5.37) and black 3.03% (95%CI 2.63, 3.42) ethnicity, compared to white ethnicity 1.74% (95%CI 1.68, 1.80). Lifetime incidence was highest in those with the greatest deprivation; most-deprived quintile 2.92% (95%CI 2.77, 3.07%) compared to least-deprived 1.68% (95%CI 1.59, 1.78%). Across sociodemographic subgroups, people with AA of black ethnicity were most likely to have anxiety (adjusted Odds Ratio versus matched controls 2.92, 95%CI 1.71, 4.91), and had the greatest risk of time off work (adjusted Hazard Ratio versus matched controls 2.54, 95%CI 1.80, 3.56). AA affects around 1 in 50 people over their lifetime. Incidence and the impact of AA on mental health and work outcomes, is highest in ethnic groups other than white. Clinicians should be aware of the marked heterogeneity in the incidence and impact of AA, and support targeted healthcare to groups at the highest risk of alopecia and its consequences.The study protocol for this retrospective observational study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (Identifier: NCT05727306).