Mental Health Equity Research Articles

Co-creating stigma-prevention strategies for mental health interventions with migrant populations

Abstract Background The ADVANCE project aims to address mental health disparities among people in a situation of vulnerability in Europe. Through a co-creation approach, workshops were conducted to devise stigma prevention strategies during the implementation of mental health promotion interventions for migrant populations in Italy and Denmark. Methods The methodology involved two rounds of scenario-based workshops, a participatory method that elicit expert opinions to solve local problems and anticipate future ones. Round 1 included two separate workshops with (1) end-users and umbrella organizations, and (2) healthcare practitioners and decision-makers, to ensure diverse perspectives and minimize the impact of power imbalances. Participants brainstormed strategies to minimize stigma and optimize the intervention scenario. In Round 2, a mixed-group workshop was held to refine the strategies. Workshops occurred in Copenhagen and Verona in March 2024. Content analysis of the data was carried out. Results In Denmark, discussions emphasized tailored presentation of the intervention promoting shared experiences and normalizing mental health challenges, language sensitivity, participation through self-identification, and attention to relational aspects in intervention delivery to combat stigma effectively and enhance acceptability and engagement with the intervention. In Italy, proposed strategies included group exercises to raise awareness and promote open dialogue about cultural differences, language barriers, and discrimination. Discussions also considered the intersectionality of stigma, including factors like gender, socioeconomic status, and sexual orientation. Common themes included language sensitivity, facilitator training, and inclusive and safe spaces. Conclusions Scenario-based workshops can be a valuable tool to facilitate the co-creation of stigma-prevention strategies while involving all stakeholders in promoting effective mental health interventions. Key messages • Co-creation approach fostered stakeholder collaboration, yielding tailored strategies that promote inclusivity, acceptability and engagement with mental health interventions for migrant populations. • Context-specific approaches that emphasize trust, confidentiality and cultural sensitivity were prioritised to tackle stigma when implementing interventions and promoting mental health equity.

Impact of Climate Change on Mental Health Among Vulnerable Groups: A Systematic Literature Review

Objective: This study aims to explore the impact of climate change on mental health among vulnerable groups, including low-income populations, Indigenous communities, children, women, and the elderly, to highlight their unique vulnerabilities and mental health outcomes. This aligns with the United Nations' Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), particularly SDG 3 (Good Health and Well-being) and SDG 13 (Climate Action), addressing the need for climate resilience and mental health equity. Theoretical Framework: The research is grounded in social vulnerability theory, emphasizing how structural inequalities exacerbate the impact of climate change on mental health. The framework integrates psychological theories of eco-anxiety and solastalgia, which explain the mental distress caused by environmental changes. Method: A systematic literature review was conducted using the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) methodology. This involved a comprehensive search of academic databases, screening studies, and qualitatively synthesizing data from 35 peer-reviewed articles published between 2000 and 2023. Results and Discussion: Findings reveal that climate change exacerbates mental health issues such as anxiety, depression, and PTSD among vulnerable groups due to their limited adaptive capacity and exposure to climate-related hazards. Vulnerable communities, including Indigenous groups and low-income populations, experience heightened psychological impacts such as eco-anxiety and solastalgia. The results underscore the importance of integrating mental health considerations into climate adaptation policies and developing targeted interventions to enhance resilience among these populations. This study also supports global efforts toward achieving SDG 10 (Reduced Inequalities) and SDG 11 (Sustainable Cities and Communities). Research Implication: The study suggests the need for comprehensive and equitable mental health strategies that prioritize vulnerable groups in climate change adaptation planning. Policymakers must consider social equity and community-based approaches to mitigate the mental health impacts of climate change. Originality/Value: This review uniquely addresses the intersection of climate change and mental health within marginalized populations, emphasizing the need for mental health integration in climate adaptation frameworks. The study highlights the underexplored psychological dimensions of climate change, providing valuable insights for developing inclusive and sustainable adaptation strategies. sustainability

Integrating Social Development and Clinical Psychology: Implications for Enhancing Mental Health Interventions

This study investigates integrating social development theories and clinical psychology practices to enhance mental health interventions. The research underscores the importance of considering socio-cultural contexts in clinical settings by critically examining the interplay between social determinants and psychological processes. This interdisciplinary approach provides a nuanced understanding of how community dynamics, socio-economic conditions, and cultural norms impact mental health outcomes. The findings advocate for a comprehensive framework incorporating social development insights into clinical psychology to create more effective, culturally sensitive, and sustainable mental health interventions. This integration is posited to improve therapeutic efficacy and contribute to the broader goal of mental health equity across diverse populations.

Performance replication of the Hospital Mental Health Risk Screen in ethnoracially diverse U.S. patients admitted through emergency care.

Patients admitted to hospitals after emergency care for injury or acute illness are at risk for later mental health problems. The American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma Standards for care of injured patients call for mental health risk screening, and the Hospital Mental Health Risk Screen (HMHRS) accurately identified at-risk patients in a developmental study that included patients from five ethnoracial groups. Replication of these findings is essential, because initial positive results for predictive screens can fail to replicate if the items were strongly related to outcomes in the development sample but not in a new sample from the population the screen was intended for. Replication of the predictive performance of the 10-item HMHRS was studied prospectively in ethnoracially diverse patients admitted after emergency care for acute illness or injury in three hospitals across the U.S. Risk screen scores and follow-up mental health outcomes were obtained for 452 of 631 patients enrolled (72%). A cut score of 10 on the HMHRS correctly identified 79% of the patients who reported elevated levels of depression, anxiety, and PTSD symptoms two months post-admission (sensitivity) and 72% of the patients whose symptoms were not elevated (specificity). HMHRS scores also predicted well for patients with acute illness, for patients with injuries, and for patients who reported an Asian American/Pacific Islander, Black, Latinx, Multirace, or White identity. Predictive performance of the HMHRS was strong overall and within all five ethnoracial subgroups. Routine screening could reduce suffering and health care costs, increase health and mental health equity, and foster preventive care research and implementation. The performance of the HMHRS should be studied in other countries and in other populations of recent trauma survivors, such as survivors of disaster or mass violence.

Whāia te iti kahurangi: Seeking perinatal mental health equity. Māori offer solutions for the health system

ObjectivesIn Aotearoa, New Zealand (NZ), Māori experience significant perinatal health inequities. Perinatal mental health and maternal suicide are critical equity issues for Aotearoa, NZ's health system and require a systems level response. Health equity is mandated in Aotearoa, NZ, through Te Tiriti o Waitangi, however, Māori continue to face inequitable access to services, resources, and best practice perinatal healthcare. Qualitative data can enhance our understanding of a health system's impact and performance. The purpose of this paper is to utilise qualitative data to identify how Aotearoa, NZ's health system is performing, from the perspectives of Māori mothers and birthing parents experiencing perinatal mental illness. DesignThis qualitative research is grounded in Kaupapa Māori Research methodology. Kaupapa Māori Research methodology is an Indigenous research methodology that privileges the voices of Māori in the design and implementation of research. Semi structured interviews were undertaken with twenty Māori mothers/birthing parents with experience of perinatal mental illness. All participants had accessed a community perinatal mental health service within the previous 12 months. ResultsExpert analysis from Māori mothers and birthing parents identified key recommendations relating to services, treatment, workforce, and communication and education. These recommendations were grouped into sub-themes encompassing options, access and barriers, and whānau. The recommendations encompassed participants’ perceptions of how the health system can enhance efficiency, improve health outcomes and achieve equity for Māori within the perinatal period. ConclusionTo achieve Māori health equity in the perinatal period, systemic and structural transformation of the perinatal health system is required. The recommendations identified by Māori mothers and birthing parents in this study can be applied at clinical, service, and system levels to remove the structural barriers faced by Māori in the perinatal health system and be utilised in the development of an equitable, early intervention and prevention focused perinatal mental health system.

Child mental health treatment access and retention in integrated primary care and traditional outpatient services.

There are disparities in child mental health treatment access and treatment retention in terms of race and ethnicity, socioeconomic status (SES), and insurance coverage. Institutions have invested in the integrated primary care (IPC) treatment model with the goal of improving treatment access and promoting child mental health equity. This study compared treatment attendance in an outpatient psychiatry clinic (OPC) versus an IPC clinic to assess whether the IPC was associated with reduced disparities in access to care and treatment retention. This study assessed whether there were differences in who is connected to care from the intake appointment to first follow-up appointment. Results showed that the IPC clinic served a more diverse patient population than the OPC clinic in terms of SES, race, and ethnicity. Differences in treatment attendance in the IPC and OPC were also found. After controlling for race, ethnicity, insurance, and distance from patient's home zip code to clinic, the IPC treatment setting was associated with poorer intake and follow-up appointment attendance. The IPC model may be more accessible to historically underserved youth, but the treatment setting does not inherently eliminate disparities in child mental health treatment retention. Replication of this study has the potential to contribute to the external validity of study findings, improve quality assurance policies, and develop equitable workflow policies. Future research is needed to identify factors that can improve treatment attendance for populations who face greater retention barriers and to shine light on ways that healthcare systems may inadvertently maintain disparity in treatment retention.

Acceptability of Telepsychiatry among Overseas Filipino Workers in Kuwait

The challenges faced by overseas Filipino workers (OFWs) expose them to abuse, harming their mental wellness. Telepsychiatry offers hope by allowing prompt diagnosis, management, and treatment of mental health issues. Yet, the acceptability of this technology among OFWs has not been studied, and specialized psychiatric services for them are scarce. This study assessed telepsychiatry acceptance among OFWs in Kuwait. Using a cross-sectional design, participants with mental health concerns in a Philippine Embassy shelter were selected. Tailored telepsychiatry software facilitated secure online video consultations and psychotherapy sessions with a Philippines-based psychiatrist. Acceptance was measured with the telemedicine satisfaction and usefulness questionnaire. Fifty-five (55) female OFWs participated; most were household service workers (n = 53; 96.36%) with a median age of 35. Mental health disorders were diagnosed in 22 participants (40%) – including acute stress disorder (n = 14; 25.45%), major depressive disorder (n = 5; 9.09%), brief psychotic disorder (n = 1; 1.82%), post-traumatic stress disorder (n = 1; 1.82%), and adjustment disorder (n = 1; 1.82%). Acceptance-wise, the majority of the participants expressed satisfaction with the telepsychiatry service provided (mean = 4.77; SD=0.48). This pioneering research demonstrates the viability of telepsychiatry in providing vital psychosocial support to distressed OFWs in Kuwait. Sustaining and expanding this service across various countries is essential to ensure access to culturally sensitive and responsive mental health resources, thereby promoting mental health equity and the overall well-being of migrant workers

Depression Part 1: Evaluation.

By young adulthood, 1 in 5 teens will experience an episode of major depression. The second leading cause of death among youths aged 15 to 24 years is suicide, most of which will have been caused by untreated or undiagnosed depression. Depression is a highly heritable condition: depressed children often have depressed parents. Support to caregivers is important because depressed parents can have negative effects on children's development and future mental health. Groups more vulnerable to mental health disorders such as depression include Black, Indigenous, and persons of color and lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, or queer/questioning, who in recent years have the highest rate of suicide attempts (Black teens, sexual minority youth), the highest increases in suicide rates (Black children and youths), and the highest suicide rates (American Indian/Alaskan native). They frequently experience more adverse childhood events, which increases the risk of depression and suicide attempts. Pediatricians are most likely to care for these vulnerable youths, who often are less engaged in specialty mental health care for a variety of reasons, including stigma and barriers to access. By offering behavioral and mental health care to vulnerable populations in primary care, mental health equity may be achieved. Screening for depression and assessment for suicide are within the scope of pediatric practice and among the competencies recommended by the American Academy of Pediatrics and The American Board of Pediatrics.

Crossroads of Care: A Black Social Worker’s Insights into the Lives of Black Men from Adolescence to Adulthood

ABSTRACT This autoethnographic study, “Crossroads of Care: A Black Social Worker’s Insights into the Lives of Black Men from Adolescence to Adulthood,” explores the intersections of race, education, and mental health throughout the life course of Black men. Drawing on varied professional and personal experiences – from providing telehealth services for college students to being a resource within a predominantly Black high school – the research illuminates systemic barriers and profound effects of marginalization and isolation. Emphasizing evidence-based social work interventions and culturally relevant care, the study underscores the importance of narrative therapy and self-disclosure in addressing Black men’s multifaceted needs. The findings contribute to discussions on racial equity in mental health and education, offering actionable recommendations for practitioners, policymakers, and educators to strengthen support systems. Advocating for a comprehensive care model, this research endeavors to empower Black men across various life milestones, enhancing well-being by addressing the complexities of race, education, and mental health.

School-Based Suicide Prevention Efforts: The Impact of School Nurse Exclusivity on Moral Distress.

School nurses are well-positioned to assess, identify, and refer children and adolescents who are at risk of suicide. This multiple-case study examined the personal, behavioral, and environmental factors that influence the role of the school nurse in youth suicide prevention and intervention. Purposive sampling was used to recruit two school nurses who were identified as unique cases. Data from interviews, surveys, and documents generated a cross-case analysis. Findings indicate that school-level exclusive practices, such as a lack of communication and collaboration, greatly influence the role and reach of school nurses. Further, dilemmas arising from environmental barriers hinder school nurse capacity to promote student safety and affect moral distress levels. Leveraging data to demonstrate the pivotal role of school nurses to support mental health equity and reduce disparities in youth suicide is crucial to developing inclusive and responsive suicide prevention programs.

Unveiling the Unseen: Exploring the Mental Health Realities of Black Men

ABSTRACT This article provides an overview of the multifaceted landscape of mental health among Black men, shedding light on the unique challenges they face. Black men in the United States confront a complex interplay of sociocultural, historical, and economic factors that influence their mental well-being. This article synthesizes existing research and explores the disparities in mental health outcomes among Black men, delving into the stigmatization of mental health within this community. It also examines the role of systemic racism, socioeconomic factors, and cultural norms in shaping the mental health experiences of Black men. The abstract highlights the importance of culturally competent and community-driven interventions, offering insights into potential strategies to address these disparities. By recognizing the specific issues affecting mental health among Black men, this research contributes to the broader discourse on mental health equity. It underscores the imperative of tailored approaches to support the well-being of this demographic.

Equity depends on the definition: Examining the impact of segregation definitions on equity in school-based mental health.

Equity depends on the definition: Examining the impact of segregation definitions on equity in school-based mental health.

Migration-related trauma and PTSD among Latinx parents in the southeast during COVID-19.

Latinx immigrants are at risk for migration-related trauma that can lead to posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Among parents in immigrant families with undocumented family member(s) (i.e., mixed-status), risk for PTSD may be exacerbated by policies that threaten family separation and exclude immigrants from systems of support. Understanding these relationships in context is important to equip practitioners to address traumatic stress in this population. Our community-based participatory research (CBPR), mixed-methods study explored migration-related trauma and PTSD among Latinx immigrant parents in a restrictive immigration climate during the COVID-19 pandemic. We conducted 145 surveys with Latinx parents in mixed-status families and conducted multivariable linear analyses to test if immigration policy vulnerability strengthened the relationship between migration-related trauma and PTSD symptoms. Then, we conducted 15 interviews with frontline workers serving Latinx immigrant families to contextualize the relationships between migration-related trauma, immigration-related policies, and PTSD during the COVID-19 pandemic. Parent surveys revealed was no observed relationship between premigration-related trauma and PTSD symptoms (β = 0.12, p = .15). However, increases in policy vulnerability was associated with PTSD symptoms (β = 0.25, p < .01) and strengthened the relationship between postmigration trauma and PTSD symptoms (β = 0.19, p = .03). Frontline workers described how social isolation due to immigration-related policies worsened under the COVID-19 pandemic and deportation fears remained a constant stressor. Results from our CBPR study highlight the need for policies and practices that address compounding effects of migration-related trauma, policy vulnerability, and the COVID-19 pandemic to promote mental health equity among Latinx immigrant families. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

The Opportunities and Risks of Large Language Models in Mental Health.

Global rates of mental health concerns are rising, and there is increasing realization that existing models of mental health care will not adequately expand to meet the demand. With the emergence of large language models (LLMs) has come great optimism regarding their promise to create novel, large-scale solutions to support mental health. Despite their nascence, LLMs have already been applied to mental health-related tasks. In this paper, we summarize the extant literature on efforts to use LLMs to provide mental health education, assessment, and intervention and highlight key opportunities for positive impact in each area. We then highlight risks associated with LLMs' application to mental health and encourage the adoption of strategies to mitigate these risks. The urgent need for mental health support must be balanced with responsible development, testing, and deployment of mental health LLMs. It is especially critical to ensure that mental health LLMs are fine-tuned for mental health, enhance mental health equity, and adhere to ethical standards and that people, including those with lived experience with mental health concerns, are involved in all stages from development through deployment. Prioritizing these efforts will minimize potential harms to mental health and maximize the likelihood that LLMs will positively impact mental health globally.

The determinants of mental health inequalities between Chinese migrants and non-migrants during the Shanghai 2022 lockdown: a Blinder-Oaxaca decomposition

BackgroundThe mental health inequality between migrants and non-migrants was exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic. Identifying key determinants of this inequality is essential in promoting health equity.MethodsThis cross-sectional study recruited Shanghai residents by purposive sampling during the city-wide lockdown (from April 29 to June 1, 2022) using an online questionnaire. Migration statuses (non-migrants, permanent migrants, and temporary migrants) were identified by migration experience and by household registration in Shanghai. Mental health symptoms (depression, anxiety, loneliness, and problematic anger) were assessed by self-report scales. The nonlinear Blinder-Oaxaca decomposition was used to quantify mental health inequality (i.e., differences in predicted probabilities between migration groups) and the contribution of expected correlates (i.e., change in predicted probability associated with variation in the correlate divided by the group difference).ResultsThe study included 2738 participants (771 [28.2%] non-migrants; 389 [14.2%] permanent migrants; 1578 [57.6%] temporary migrants). We found inequalities in depression (7.1%) and problematic anger (7.8%) between permanent migrants and non-migrants, and inequalities in anxiety (7.3%) and loneliness (11.3%) between temporary migrants and non-migrants. When comparing permanent migrants and non-migrants, age and social capital explained 12.7% and 17.1% of the inequality in depression, and 13.3% and 21.4% of the inequality in problematic anger. Between temporary migrants and non-migrants, age and social capital also significantly contributed to anxiety inequality (23.0% and 18.2%) and loneliness inequality (26.5% and 16.3%), while monthly household income (20.4%) and loss of monthly household income (34.0%) contributed the most to anxiety inequality.ConclusionsSignificant inequalities in depression and problematic anger among permanent migrants and inequalities in anxiety and loneliness among temporary migrants were observed. Strengthening social capital and economic security can aid in public health emergency preparedness and promote mental health equity among migrant populations.

The Critical Role of Health Educators: Findings from the 2021 Public Health Workforce Interests and Needs Survey (PH WINS).

This analysis of governmental health educators from the 2021 Public Health Workforce Interest and Needs Survey (PH WINS) examines demographic and workplace characteristics, COVID-19 pandemic activities and beliefs, job satisfaction, training needs, mental health, and engagement in health equity. Participants were public health staff in public health agencies who completed the 2021 PH WINS. Chi-square and means tests were used to compare job satisfaction, mental health status, training needs, and health equity concepts between health educators and other disciplines in the governmental public health workforce. Like PH WINS 2017 findings, health educators were significantly younger, more likely to be female, more diverse, and more likely to work in regional/local health departments than the national governmental public health workforce. About 70% of health educators played a role in responding to the pandemic. Only 46.1% of health educators rated their mental health as excellent or very good as compared to 48.2% of other disciplines. About 31% considered leaving the organization due to stress, unsatisfactory opportunities, and lack of mentoring. Health educators expressed the need for training in financial and change management. Both health educators and other governmental workers expressed high levels of awareness of and confidence in addressing social determinants of health and health equity, but less confidence in addressing environmental justice. Certified health education specialists (CHES(R)) were significantly more likely to be aware of concepts of health equity, social determinants of health (SDOH), and structural racism than non-CHES(R). Overall, the training needs and job satisfaction of health educators changed little between the two surveys. However, COVID-19 had a significantly greater impact on their mental health status compared to other public health disciplines. They also are addressing racism in their communities and are more aware of health equity concepts than other public health disciplines. Implications for strengthening public health infrastructure, as well as recruitment/retention, professional preparation, and practice are provided.

Cross-Cultural Insights from Two Global Mental Health Studies: Self-Enhancement and Ingroup Biases

AbstractThis commentary highlights two cross-cultural issues identified from our global mental health (GMH) research, RECOLLECT (Recovery Colleges Characterisation and Testing) 2: self-enhancement and ingroup biases. Self-enhancement is a tendency to maintain and express unrealistically positive self-views. Ingroup biases are differences in one’s evaluation of others belonging to the same social group. These biases are discussed in the context of GMH research using self-report measures across cultures. GMH, a field evolving since its Lancet series introduction in 2007, aims to advance mental health equity and human rights. Despite a 16.5-fold increase in annual GMH studies from 2007 to 2016, cross-cultural understanding remains underdeveloped. We discuss the impact of individualism versus collectivism on self-enhancement and ingroup biases. GMH research using concepts, outcomes, and methods aligned with individualism may give advantages to people and services oriented to individualism. GMH research needs to address these biases arising from cross-cultural differences to achieve its aim.

Service Utilisation of an Innovative Mental Health Counselling Clinic

Abstract Responding to the increasing challenges to mental health equity, Talk It Out Counseling Clinic (the Clinic), an innovative, public-facing counselling service, was established at the University of Toronto during the pandemic. Operating on the principles of anti-oppression and trauma-informed care, the Clinic trains Master of Social Work students to deliver mental health counselling to populations encountering multiple barriers to mental health equity through phone or video. Guided by a quality improvement framework, this study used chart reviews to examine the demographic characteristics, initial mental health status and service utilisation of clients (N = 116) who completed services at the Clinic during its inaugural year. Three-quarters of the clients identified as Black or other racialised individuals, and over 70 per cent rated their general mental health as poor or fair. Nearly 80 per cent of clients referred to the Clinic proceeded to an intake, amongst whom 69.6 per cent successfully completed the services. Warm handoff was associated with service engagement, whilist men and older clients were more likely to terminate the services prematurely. The study underscores the mental health needs of communities confronting multiple challenges and illuminates the processes conducive to client engagement and service delivery within an innovative, school-run mental health clinic.

Parental Perception of Children's Mental Health During the Pandemic: Insights From an Italian Cross-Sectional Study.

This study explores the impact of the pandemic on children's mental health. It examined the understanding of parents regarding their children's mental condition and their ability to identify issues, 2 years post the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic. Using a cross-sectional design, 507 Italian parents reported on their youngest child aged between 2 and 17, totaling 507 children. The outcomes focused on were parental perception of children's mental health deterioration, scores on the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) above the clinical cut-off, and parental under-recognition of mental health issues. Descriptive analyses and multivariable logistic regression models were executed (significance at p < .05). Parents were 88.1% women (median age 41 years, interquartile range [IQR] = 36-47). Their children were 50.3% female [median age 6 years (IQR = 4-11)]. The data revealed 21.1% of parents perceived a deterioration in their children's mental health, while 44.2% had SDQ scores above the cut-off. Parental under-recognition of mental issues was found in 20.1% of cases. Significant correlations were found between parental perception of deterioration, SDQ scores, and factors like parental mental distress and children's sleep issues. The findings suggest that schools and verified websites can serve as critical conduits for providing parents with reliable information. By promoting early identification and intervention, such mechanisms can help ensure mental health equity for children. The research highlights the effect of the pandemic on children's mental health and the issue of parental under-recognition. The results underscore the importance of public health initiatives that enhance mental health information accessibility and reliability for parents.

Mental Health Insurance in India: An Examination of Policy Implementation Post-MHCA 2017

Purpose of review: Owing to the high cost of care and huge treatment gap associated with mental illnesses in India, this review investigated the implementation of mental health insurance coverage in India following the mandate of the Mental Health Care Act of 2017 (MHCA 2017). Collection and analysis of data: We systematically identified health insurance providers in India through the Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority of India (IRDAI) website. We meticulously searched and obtained policy documents from either the IRDAI website or the respective insurance company websites. Our classification process involved determining if a policy explicitly covered mental illness, which we discerned by examining definitions of mental illness, indemnification clauses or the presence of International Classification of Diseases-10 codes within the policy. Conclusion: We evaluated 235 policies provided by 30 insurance companies and found that 37.5% (88) of policies covered mental illnesses, 11.5% (28) covered persons with disabilities, whereas 51% (119) did not offer any coverage. The majority of the companies did not cover suicide and substance use disorders. There are disparities in the outpatient care offerings, including extended waiting periods for coverage of mental illness. This review highlights the importance of aligning insurance practices with MHCA 2017s provisions to promote mental health equity in India. It also advocates for comprehensive mental health coverage that includes outpatient care, substance use disorders and suicide as well as a need for standardized definitions and transparent policy communication.