Meniscal Suture Research Articles

Double-Needle Meniscal Suture Technique: Technical Description and Clinical Application in Dogs.

Current treatments for medial meniscus lesions in association with CCL ruptures have shown disappointing long-term outcomes. Meniscal suturing may improve the outcome, but their clinical application remains limited. This study aims to assess the practicability of a minimally invasive DNT to facilitate meniscal suturing in dogs. Ten stifles of eight client-owned dogs with arthroscopically confirmed CCL disease and medial meniscal tears in the abaxial third of the meniscus were included. The described suture technique was applied under joint distraction using the Titan joint distractor. Surgical stabilization of all stifles was then accomplished via an X-Porous TTA procedure. The DNT allowed for the precise placement of meniscal sutures. Minor intraoperative complications included reduced arthroscopic visibility (n = 2) and suture breakage during its passage through the meniscus (n = 3). No complications related to the meniscal sutures were noted throughout the six-month follow-up period. The described DNT proved to be a viable and effective method for suturing lesions of the caudal horn of the medial meniscus, provided there is adequate visualization during the procedure. Appropriate stifle stabilization postoperatively is mandatory for protecting the suture and avoiding concomitant meniscal lesions due to joint instability.

Factors associated with the development of post-traumatic pain in patients at risk of post-traumatic osteoarthritis

The aim of the study – to identify the factors associated with the development of chronic post-traumatic pain (CPTP) in patients with knee joint (KJ) injury.Materials and methods. The study group consisted of 136 patients (51.5% women, age 38.7±12.4 years) who suffered a KJ injury with damage to the anterior cruciate ligament and/or menisci. The inclusion criterion was the presence of pain in KJ ≥4 on a numerical rating scale (NRS 0–10) for at least 1 month after injury. Surgical intervention (plastic surgery of the anterior cruciate ligament, meniscus suture, meniscus resection, combined operations) was performed immediately after injury in 48.5% of patients. The incidence of CPTP was assessed (persistence of pain during movement ≥4 on NRS after 3 and 6 months of follow-up) and factors related to the development of CPTP. All patients were recommended to use orthoses of KJ, physical therapy and taking nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in the “on-demand” mode. Results. CPTP was detected after 3 months in 33.1%, and after 6 months in 32.4% of patients. Surgical treatment did not affect the development of CPTP: odds ratio (OR) – 1.241, 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 0.775–1.986 (p=0.474). The risk of CPTP after 6 months was statistically significantly higher in women, persons with a high body mass index (≥30 kg/m2), initially severe pain (≥7 on NRS), in the presence of initial signs of depression and anxiety (HADS (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale) ≥8) and highly probable central sensitization (CSI (Central Sensitization Inventory) ≥40): OR=2,152, 95% CI: 1,383–3,348 (p=0,002); OR=1,243, 95% CI: 1,054–1,465 (p=0,05); OR=3,567, 95% CI: 1,717–5,708 (p=0,001); OR=2,330, 95% CI: 1,070–5,726 (p=0.0044); OR=2,446, 95% CI: 1,220–4,905 (p=0,016); OR=2,584, 95% CI: 1,101–8,133 (p=0.043), respectively.

Continuous Meniscal Repair Technique Allows for Shorter Operative Time and Learning Curve Compared With Traditional Vertical Mattress Technique in Controlled Arthroscopic Training in Porcine Model

To compare the amount of time used to perform meniscal suturing on a standardized lesion using either a traditional or continuous arthroscopic suturing technique. A preclinical study was carried out with 21 medical doctors who underwent training in the 2 modalities of meniscal repair by arthroscopy in an animal model laboratory. Participants performed both types of sutures with a previously standardized lesion. The execution time of the techniques was measured, and an experienced surgeon evaluated the stability of a meniscal tear after the repair. Data were analyzed using a t test for paired samples to calculate the difference between the execution times of the techniques. The time required to perform the continuous meniscal suture was shorter than that of the traditional suture. After statistical analysis, the time difference between the techniques was significant (mean difference 4:17 ± 5:30 minutes; 95% confidence interval, 1:46-6:46 minutes). Surgeons took less time than residents for the traditional suture (P= .036), but the times were similar for the continuous suture. This suggests that experience level has a greater effect on the time needed for the traditional suture than for the continuous suture. The continuous suture technique was performed in a shorter time compared with the traditional suture technique in a porcine model. The results of this preclinical study suggest that the continuous vertical inside-out meniscal suture technique can enhance surgical procedures for longitudinal tears requiring ≥4 stitches, offering a faster and more intuitive learning curve compared with the traditional inside-out suture technique.

Inside-out repair of complex tears in the posterior horn of the lateral meniscus

All-inside meniscus devices are preferred over inside-out sutures for complex tears in the posterior horn of the lateral meniscus due to the ease of use, avoidance of additional skin incisions, and reduced surgical time. However, inside-out sutures have the advantages of being less traumatic due to smaller diameter needles, better healing rate, and less chance of injuries to posterior neurovascular structures due to direct visualization and protection. To the author’s knowledge, the inside-out repair technique has been described only for vertical tears and not for complex tears in the posterior horn of the lateral meniscus. This video describes the technique of repairing complex lateral meniscus tears with inside-out sutures using various suture configurations. The lateral meniscus tear pattern is identified. A posterolateral safety incision is made, and a retractor is placed posterior to the capsule. The popliteal vein is identified at this step and kept under visualization to avoid injury. Meniscal repair configurations such as “H,” “X,” and “A” patterns and simple vertical or horizontal sutures are planned according to the tear pattern. Sutures are passed using inside-out meniscal sutures, 18G spinal needle, self-retrieving suture devices or a combination of those, and tied over the capsule using sliding knots while the repair site is arthroscopically visualized.

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture Combined with Complete Radial Tear of the Posterior Horn of the Lateral Meniscus: Suture or Resection?

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture often presents with a tear of the posterior horn of the lateral meniscus. There is no clear preference between ACL reconstruction with suture and resection of the meniscus. We aimed to compare the clinical efficacy of ACL reconstruction with suture versus resection in patients presenting with arthroscopic ACL rupture and radial complete tear of the posterior corner of the lateral meniscus. We retrospectively analyzed 157 patients with ACL rupture and complete radial tear of the posterior horn of the lateral meniscus. Between May 2010 and April 2015, 86 of 157 patients underwent ACL reconstruction and meniscus suture (study group, 54.78%) and 71 of 157 patients underwent ACL reconstruction and meniscus resection (control group, 45.22%) in our department. All patients were monitored over the 12 to 72-month follow-up period. The primary evaluation indices were the Lysholm scores, the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) scores, pivot shift test, the Barret criteria, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings of meniscal healing. The majority of 157 patients were relatively young men (29.64 ± 7.79 years) with low body mass index (BMI) (23.79 ± 2.74). The postoperative Lysholm and IKDC scores of the two groups were significantly improved over the corresponding preoperative scores (p < 0.05). The clinical results and excellent and good rates were significantly better for the study group than for the control group (both, p < 0.05). MRI showed that the meniscal healed rate of the study group was 96.51%. There was no significant difference in BMI between subgroups for any functional outcome. For patients with ACL rupture and complete radial tear of the posterior horn of the lateral meniscus, ACL reconstruction and both simultaneous suture and resection of the posterior horn of the lateral meniscus were found to be safe and effective. There was no association between outcomes and BMI. However, the former was associated with a superior long-term clinical effect and may restore the integrity of the meniscus and is particularly recommended for young patients.

Biomechanical Characteristics of All-Suture Meniscal Repair Devices Compared With PEEK-Anchored Devices and Inside-Out Suture for Meniscal Repair: A Porcine Study.

Recently, all-suture, all-inside meniscal repair devices-including devices containing flat sutures or tapes-have been introduced. Similar to those in suture anchors, these modifications may have different performance characteristics than conventional sutures and polyether ether ketone (PEEK)-anchored devices. To compare the biomechanical characteristics of all-suture meniscal repair devices with those of a conventional PEEK-anchored device and an inside-out meniscal suture construct. Controlled laboratory study. A total of 48 adult porcine menisci with simulated bucket-handle tears were included. Single-device repairs were performed with the SuperBall Meniscal Repair System, FiberStitch, and FAST-FIX 360 with 2 PEEK anchors, and a vertical mattress inside-out suture repair was performed using a Ti-Cron No. 2-0 braided polyethylene terephthalate suture. All specimens were preloaded (10 N) and cycled 200 times (between 10 and 50 N). Specimens surviving cyclic loading were then destructively tested. Endpoints included maximum failure load, stiffness, cyclic displacement, and failure mode. The goal was 12 successful tests in each group. Metrics between groups were compared using analysis of variance with post hoc tests to control for multiple comparisons. The SuperBall (108.9 N) was significantly stronger than the FAST-FIX 360 (67.3 N) and Ti-Cron (75.2 N), and the FiberStitch (102.8 N) was significantly stronger than the FAST-FIX 360 (P≤ .01 for all). Cyclic stiffness increased during cyclic loading for all constructs (P < .001). The Ti-Cron was significantly stiffer than the SuperBall during 5 to 200 cycles (P < .001). Cyclic displacement significantly increased in all constructs during cycling (P < .001) but did not differ between devices. Failure mode varied by device: the Ti-Cron repairs failed because of suture breakage, the SuperBall and FAST-FIX 360 failed at the anchor, and the FiberStitch showed both failure modes. The all-suture, all-inside meniscal repair devices demonstrated superior strength to the PEEK-anchored device and the classic inside-out suture meniscal repair but no statistically significant difference in cyclic displacement.

Fibrin Clot–Augmented Meniscal Repair

Background: Failure rate of meniscal repair can reach 25%. Multiple techniques have been used to increase meniscal healing, notably biological augmentation techniques. One of them is fibrin clot–augmented meniscal repair, which will be described in this video. Indications: This technique is indicated mainly for the lesions with a high failure rate. This includes large, horizontal, and radial tears and even for meniscal cysts, especially in a stable knee. This technique can also be used in revision meniscal suture when failure is no longer an option. Surgical Technique: Fibrin clot is prepared from sterile peripheral venous blood from the patient. A plastic syringe is used to stir the blood in a sterile glass container. The fibrin clot is then formed and washed rigorously with saline solution. Rolling the fibrin clot which is fixed to the syringe allows to give the fibrillar aspect of the clot. The formed fibrin clot is now solid enough to be manipulated and can be fixed to a vicryl suture thread allowing it to enter the knee and be fixed inside the meniscal lesion. The clot is wrapped inside the meniscal lesion with inside-out or outside-in suture technique. Results: We used this technique for multiple types of lesions, like bucket handle meniscal tear, horizontal meniscal cleavage, parrot beak tear, and even in lesions within white-white zone. The postoperative protocol is the same as standard inside-out meniscal repair. This technique has been used in the literature with promising results. Conclusion: The fibrin clot–augmented meniscal repair is a demanding but promising technique. We need further follow-up to confirm its effectiveness. Patient Consent Disclosure Statement: The author(s) attests that consent has been obtained from any patient(s) appearing in this publication. If the individual may be identifiable, the author(s) has included a statement of release or other written form of approval from the patient(s) with this submission for publication.

Usefulness of Probing Sensor Device for Evaluating Meniscal Suture and Scaffold Implantation.

Appropriate suture tension is a key factor in successful meniscal repair. This study aimed to clarify the appropriate value of meniscal stabilization with suture repair based on a probing procedure for healthy porcine menisci and a novel meniscal scaffold. After evaluating the reliability of the probing sensor, meniscal vertical tear and partial meniscectomy models were developed, in which suture repair and meniscal scaffold implantation were performed at suture intervals ranging between 20 and 2.5 mm. The residence forces at each interval were evaluated using a probing sensor. Moreover, a tensile test was conducted to evaluate the displacement and presence or absence of gaps. We found that normal and meniscal scaffolds should be fixed within 5 mm of suture interval. The probing residence forces required were at least 1.0 N for vertical tears and 3.0 N for meniscal scaffolds. These findings may be taken into consideration to reduce suture failure following meniscal tear repair and stabilizing meniscal scaffold fixation.

Short-term outcomes of 43 dogs treated with arthroscopic suturing for meniscal tears associated with cranial cruciate ligament disease.

To describe short-term outcomes and complications in dogs receiving meniscal suturing and concurrent tibial plateau leveling osteotomy (TPLO) with or without augmentation with an extracapsular suture. Retrospective case series. Forty-three client-owned dogs submitted for cruciate ligament disease. Dogs were included if meniscal suturing was performed during or after a TPLO procedure. Criteria included an unstable medial meniscus without evidence of a tear, a caudal vertical longitudinal tear with or without displacement, or if a bucket-handle tear was debrided and the remaining rim was unstable. Stifle stabilization was performed by either a standard TPLO or an augmented TPLO (TPLO + internal brace [IB]). Outcome measures included physical examination findings, radiographs, subjective gait examination, Liverpool Osteoarthritis in Dogs (LOAD) scores, and second-look arthroscopy. Forty-four meniscal repairs were performed in 43 dogs. Five types of meniscal tears were treated employing eight suture materials. Complications were documented in 15 cases (34%). The stabilization technique had a significant impact on the outcome (p = .049): TPLO + IB had a 93.3% success rate and the success rate was 71.4% in the TPLO-only group. Five types of meniscal pathology were addressed successfully in the study, indicating that currently accepted criteria for meniscal suturing in dogs may be overly conservative. The majority of complications were not related to the meniscal suturing itself and did not compromise the outcome. The stifle stabilization technique had an impact on outcome. The authors found arthroscopic meniscal suturing to be practical and successful in this patient population. Postoperative stifle stability had an impact on successful treatment.

Bailout Options for Intra-operative Implant and Instrumentation Related Incidents and Complications During Arthroscopic Knee Surgery-A Retrospective Study.

Arthroscopic knee procedures are one amongst the common surgical interventions for problems in the knee. It is technically more demanding than an open procedure and is associated with several potential complications. During arthroscopy procedures, several technical challenges may arise, and even experienced surgeons may encounter new issues. However, careful attention to the surgical technique can help prevent or resolve them. The study was conducted on all patients who underwent knee arthroscopy procedure during study period. We recorded details of the implants used and any unexpected situations related to them, as well as how they were managed. Instrumentation-related parameters such as screwdriver issues, radiofrequency ablator issues, scope damages, shaver complications, probe complications, and meniscus suture passing devices were also assessed. In total, there were 12 (3.73%) implant and instrument-related incidents and complications, of which 5 (1.55%) were implant-related and 7 (2.17%) were instrument related. Among the instrumentation-related incidents and complications, two (0.62%) were screwdriver breakage incidents, two (0.62%) were radiofrequency ablator-related incidents, one was arthroscopic probe (0.31%) related incident, one (0.31%) was meniscus suture passing device related complication and one (0.31%) was arthroscope related incident. Surgeons must be ready to anticipate and effectively manage any technical difficulties that may arise during the procedure, maintaining composure in the face of unexpected challenges and guiding the team. In most cases, incidents can be addressed intra operatively and may not have long-term effects on patient outcomes. It is crucial to have multiple implant and instrument backup options available for successful surgery.

The Triple Varus Knee: A Case Presentation

Background: Knee instability due to posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) and posterolateral corner (PLC) deficiency is a devastating condition that negatively affects patient quality of life. This video presents the surgical management of a triple varus knee, including combined high tibial osteotomy (HTO), revision PCL and PLC reconstruction, and meniscus root repair. Indications: Combined HTO and revision PCL and PLC reconstruction is indicated for patients with previously failed PCL and PLC reconstruction in the setting of varus malalignment. Technique Description: The procedure begins with a medial opening-wedge biplanar HTO, which is fixed with a patient-specific locking plate. The PCL femoral tunnel is drilled via a low anterolateral portal, and the tibial insertion is debrided via a posteromedial portal. The medial meniscus is carefully freed from the posterior capsule, and 2 luggage tag sutures are placed through the posterior root. The PCL tibial tunnel and meniscus root tunnels are drilled via their respective guides. The meniscal sutures are passed through the tunnel but not fixed. An Achilles bone-block allograft is passed through the PCL tibial tunnel and fixed with suspensory fixation and an interference screw on the femoral side, while the tibial side is left free. A peroneal nerve neurolysis is performed. A fibular tunnel is drilled, and a semitendinosus allograft is whip-stitched on both sides and passed through the tunnel. A Beath pin is inserted into the femur, and the tunnel is over drilled. Both limbs of the graft are passed deep to the iliotibial band and into the tunnel. The tibial side of the PCL is fixed with an interference screw at 90° of knee flexion. The PLC grafts are fixed with an interference screw at 30° of knee flexion with slight valgus. The medial meniscus root sutures are tied over a button, with 60° of knee flexion. Screws from osteotomy fixation are replaced as needed. Results: Although outcomes following the combined procedure are lacking, good to excellent clinical outcomes have been reported in isolation following each procedure. Conclusion: A combination of HTO and revision PCL and PLC reconstruction should be considered for patients with persistent instability and/or pain in the setting of triple varus knee. Patient Consent Disclosure Statement: The author(s) attests that consent has been obtained from any patient(s) appearing in this publication. If the individual may be identifiable, the author(s) has included a statement of release or other written form of approval from the patient(s) with this submission for publication.

A bibliometric and visualized analysis of meniscus suture based on the WOS core collection from 2010 to 2022: A review.

Meniscus suture is an important treatment method for meniscus injury and contributes to the preservation of proprioception, restoration of knee biomechanics and alleviation of progressive osteoarthritis. However, there are few visualized analyses concerning the present studies of meniscus suture. This paper aims to evaluate the global trends, highlights and frontiers of meniscus suture. A bibliometric analysis was conducted based on the results of studies related to meniscus suture from web of science core collection. VOSviewer, GraphPad Prism, Microsoft Excel and R-bibliometrix were utilized for the bibliometric analysis of country and institution distribution, chronological distribution, source journals analysis, prolific authors and institutions analysis, keywords analysis, and reference co-citation analysis. A total of 950 publications on meniscus suture from 177 different sources were retrieved over the set time span. These publications were completed by 3177 authors from 1112 institutions in 54 countries. The United States was the most prolific country with 7960 citations and 348 publications (36.63%). Furumatsu Takayuki acted as the most prolific author (51 publications), while Robert F LaPrade with 1398 citations was the most-cited author. And more papers were published in the core journals, including American Journal of Sports Medicine, Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery, Knee Surgery Sports Traumatology Arthroscopy and Arthroscopy Techniques. Furthermore, "meniscus healing," "meniscus root tear" seem to be the emerging research hotspots. Notably, the publication trend concerning the all-inside suture technique has been rising during the past decade. The number of research publications on meniscus suture has been continuously risen since 2010. The authors, publications and institutions from the United States and East Asia were still the mainstays in this field. And the all-inside suture may become the mainstream surgical technique in the future, with meniscus healing and meniscus root tears being research highlights recently.

Study on clinical characteristics and surgical methods of bucket-handle meniscal tears

To summarize the clinical features, surgical methods, and prognosis of bucket-handle meniscal tears (BHMTs), and provide guidance for clinical treatment. The clinical data of 91 BHMTs patients (91 knees), who met the selection criteria and were admitted between January 2015 and January 2021, was retrospectively analyzed. There were 68 males and 23 females. Age ranged from 16 to 58 years with an average of 34.4 years. The injury was caused by sports in 68 cases, traffic accident in 15 cases, and falls or sprains in 8 cases. There were 49 cases of left knee injury and 42 cases of right knee injury. The time from the onset of symptoms to the admission ranged from 1 day to 13 months (median, 18 days), including >1 month in 35 cases and ≤1 month in 56 cases. Medial BHMTs occurred in 52 cases and lateral BHMTs in 39 cases. There were 36 cases with ACL rupture and 12 cases with discoid meniscus. The knee extension was limited more than 10° in 55 cases. According to the condition of meniscus injury, the meniscus suture with Inside-out combined with All-inside techniques (54 cases) or meniscoplasty (37 cases) under arthroscopy were selected. ACL reconstruction was performed in all patients with ACL rupture with autogenous hamstring tendon. Postoperative complications were observed. International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, Lysholm score, and Tegner score were used to evaluate knee function, and clinical failure was recorded. Two patients developed intermuscular venous thrombosis, which improved after oral anticoagulant therapy. No vascular injury, postoperative infection, joint stiffness, or other complications occurred in all patients. All patients were followed up 24-95 months, with a median of 64 months. A total of 12 cases (13.19%) failed the operation and were re-operated or given oral anti-inflammatory analgesics and rehabilitation therapy. At last follow-up, IKDC score and Lysholm score of 91 patients significantly increased when compared with those before operation ( P<0.05), while Tegner score significantly decreased ( P<0.05). The above indexes of patients treated with meniscus suture and meniscoplasty were also significantly different from those before operation ( P<0.05). BHMTs occurs mostly in young men and is one of the important reasons for the limitation of knee extension after trauma. Arthroscopic meniscus suture and meniscoplasty can obtain good effectiveness according to individual conditions of patients. But the latter can better preserve the shape and function of meniscus, and theoretically can obtain better long-term outcomes, which needs to be confirmed by further research with larger sample size.

Clinical outcome of iterative meniscal suture after ACL reconstruction at a minimum of 2 years’ follow-up

IntroductionFailure rates in meniscal suture associated to ACL reconstruction range from 10 to 26.9%, often leading to meniscectomy. In young patients, the wish to conserve the meniscus may lead to iterative suture, if the lesion allows. There are no data available for clinical results of repeat meniscal suture at the same site as the primary lesion in a stabilized knee. The immediate socioeconomic cost, compared to meniscectomy, needs to be taken into account, and benefit needs to be demonstrated. The main aim of the present study was to assess the rate of secondary meniscectomy after iterative meniscal suture in stabilized knees. The study hypothesis was that failure rates are higher in iterative isolated meniscal suture after ligament reconstruction than in primary repair. Material and methodsThis single-center retrospective study analyzed patients receiving iterative meniscal suture on stable knee, between 2009 and 2019, with a minimum 26 months’ follow-up. Twenty-three patients were analyzed: 15 male, 8 female; mean age at iterative suture, 28.1±7.9 years (range, 14–49 years); mean BMI, 24.2±2.9kg/m2 (range, 19–31). Mean time to recurrence was 38.9±25.1 months (range, 6–93 months). Initial ACL graft used the patellar ligament in 69.6% of cases (n=16) and the hamstrings in 30.4% (n=7). Mean differential laximetry before iterative suture was 1.7±0.3mm (range, 1.2–2.3mm). Iterative suture was in the medial meniscus in 69.6% of cases (16/23) and in the lateral meniscus in 30.4% (7/23). Risk factors for failure, defined by requirement for meniscectomy, were assessed. Functional results were assessed on Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score and Tegner score. ResultsThe failure rate was 48% (11/23), incorporating all lesions together. Bucket-handle tear was most frequently associated with failure (91%; p<0.01). There was significant improvement after iterative suture in subjective IKDC score (51.6±15.2 vs. 81.3±15.6; p<0.001) and KOOS scores: symptoms and stiffness, 66.6±13.7 vs. 91.1±7.53 (p<0.001); pain, 79.2±12.7 vs. 93.4±7.4 (p<0.01); function, 91.3±11.2 vs. 97.9±4.44 (p<0.001); quality of life, 38.1±23.2 vs. 62.3±30.1 (p<0.001). ConclusionThe failure rate for iterative meniscal suture on stabilized knee was 48%. Bucket-handle tear was a major risk factor for failure (91%). Despite these high failure rates, functional results systematically improved. Level of evidenceIV.

Continuous Vertical Inside-Out Versus Traditional Vertical Inside-Out Meniscal Repair: A Biomechanical Comparison.

Biomechanical assessment of meniscal repairs is essential for evaluating different meniscal suturing methods and techniques. The continuous meniscal suture technique is a newer method of meniscal repair that may have biomechanical differences compared with traditional techniques. To evaluate the displacement, stiffness after cyclical loading, and load to failure for a continuous vertical inside-out meniscal suture versus a traditional vertical inside-out meniscal suture in a porcine medial meniscus. Controlled laboratory study. A total of 28 porcine knees were acquired and divided into 2 test groups of 14 medial meniscus each. A 2.0-cm longitudinal red-white zone cut was made in the body of the medial meniscus for each knee. The continuous suture (CS) group received 4 vertical stitches performed with a continuous vertical meniscal suture technique, and the inside-out suture (IO) group received a traditional vertical suture with 4 stitches. Two traction tapes were passed between the sutures and positioned in the biomechanical testing fixture device. Each specimen underwent load-to-failure testing at 5 mm/s, and displacement, system stiffness, and maximum load to failure were compared between the groups. The displacement after the cyclic test was 0.53 ± 0.12 and 0.48 ± 0.07 mm for the CS and IO groups, respectively. There was no significant difference between the groups (P = .2792). The stiffness at the ultimate load testing was 36.3 ± 1.9 and 35.3 ± 2.4 N/mm for groups CS and IO, respectively, with no significant difference between the groups (P = .2557). In the load-to-failure test, the ultimate load was 218.2 ± 63.9 and 238.3 ± 71.3 N in the CS and IO groups, respectively, with no significant group differences (P = .3062). A continuous vertical meniscal suture created a configuration for treating longitudinal meniscal lesions that was beneficial and biomechanically similar to a traditional vertical suture technique. The study findings indicate that use of the continuous vertical inside-out meniscal suture technique is a possible therapeutic option.

Meniscal Repair Compared to Meniscectomy for Meniscal Injury: 3-year Outcomes from a Retrospective Cohort Study.

Meniscal injury is a common problem that can lead to knee pain and dysfunction. Meniscal repair and meniscectomy are two treatment approaches for meniscal injury, but the latter may increase the risk of osteoarthritis. We aimed to compare the 3-year outcomes of a new method of meniscal suturing with meniscectomy among patients with meniscal injury. This retrospective cohort study compared meniscal repair (treatment group) and meniscectomy (control group) in patients with meniscal injury. We evaluated the outcomes of 134 patients. under treatment with these approaches based on the Lysholm scale, which measures knee function and symptoms. The study used the chi-square test and the Mann-Whitney U test to compare the proportion of patients with different outcomes and the Lysholm scale scores between the treatment and control groups. The study also conducted subgroup analyses based on gender and age using the Mann-Whitney U test. The level of significance was set at P < 0.05 for all statistical tests. The treatment group had a higher proportion of patients with excellent results, although the difference was not statistically significant (17.2% in the treatment group vs. 10.0% in the control group, P = 0.223). However, a comparative analysis of the proportion of patients with good results revealed statistically significant differences, with 67.2% of patients in the treatment group achieving good outcomes compared to 45.7% in the control group (χ2 = 6,256, df = 1 P = 0.012, HR 1,470 95%CI 1,081-1,999). The average score on the Lysholm scale was significantly higher in the treatment group (87.48, 95% CI 85.1-89.7, SD = 9.2) compared to the control group (81.73, 95% CI 78.4-84.9, SD = 13.7) (U = 1609, Z = -2.813, P = 0.005). Subgroup analyses based on gender and age also showed significant differences in the Lysholm scale scores. The study demonstrates that meniscal repair is more effective than meniscectomy in improving patient outcomes, with a higher proportion of patients achieving excellent and good results and higher scores on the Lysholm scale. These findings support the use of meniscal repair as a preferred treatment approach for patients with meniscal injuries.

Parameniscal Cyst Arthroscopic Excision by the Modified Fat Pad Approach Can Shorten Recovery Time-A New Surgical Method with Retrospective Study.

Parameniscal cysts can be removed without meniscectomy, but for large or multiloculated meniscal cysts, traditional arthroscopic excision may leave the meniscus unstable. This study aimed to describe a modified fat pad approach for parameniscal cyst arthroscopic excision that retains a stable structure of the synovial margin of the meniscus and to compare the clinical outcomes between the traditional cyst excision and modified excision techniques. Fifty-six patients with parameniscal cysts between 2014 and 2018 were retrospectively included in this study with 28 patients in each group. All patients underwent arthroscopic parameniscal cyst excisions with traditional and modified excision techniques respectively in each group. The International Knee Documentation Committee subjective (IKDC) score, Lysholm score, visual analogue scale (VAS) score, Tegner score, active range of motion (ROM) and time to recover full ROM were used to evaluate the clinical outcomes by using the t-test. The patient population included 21 males and 35 females, with a mean follow-up of 29 months. Of these, 28 patients underwent traditional arthroscopic cyst excisions and meniscal sutures, and 28 patients underwent arthroscopic excisions by the modified fat pad approach. There were no significant differences in the IKDC score, Lysholm score, Tegner score or VAS score between the traditional and modified excision groups at the final follow-up time point. However, the postoperative time to recover full ROM in the modified excision group was significantly lower than those in the traditional excision group (p < 0.05). Arthroscopic excision with the modified fat pad approach yielded a shorter pain phase and less time to recover full ROM during recovery compared with the traditional arthroscopic excision. The new method seemed to be effective, as evidenced by the positive clinical outcomes of patients.

Finite element analysis of the knee joint stress after partial meniscectomy for meniscus horizontal cleavage tears

ObjectiveTo establish a finite element model of meniscus horizontal cleavage and partial resection, to simulate the mechanical changes of knee joint under 4 flexion angles, and to explore what is the optimal surgical plan. MethodsWe used Mimics Research, Geomagic Wrap, and SolidWorks computer software to reconstruct the 3D model of the knee joint, and then produced the horizontal cleavage tears model of the internal and lateral meniscus, the suture model, and the partial meniscectomy model. These models were assembled into a complete knee joint in SolidWorks software, and corresponding loads and boundary constraints were added to these models in ANSYS software to simulate the changing trend of pressure and shear force on femoral condylar cartilage, meniscus, and tibial cartilage under the flexion angles of 0°, 10°, 20°, 30° and 40° of the knee joint. At the same time, the difference of force area between medial interventricular and lateral interventricular of knee joint under four states of bending the knee was compared, to explore the different effects of different surgical methods on knee joint after horizontal meniscus tear. ResultsWithin the four medial meniscus injury models, the lowest peak internal pressure and shear force of the knee joint was observed in the meniscal suture model; the highest values were found in the bilateral leaflet resection model and the inferior leaflet resection model; the changes of pressure, shear force and stress area in the superior leaflet resection model were the most similar to the changes of the knee model with the meniscal suture model. ConclusionSuture repair is the best way to maintain the force relationship in the knee joint. However, resection of the superior leaflet of the meniscus is also a reliable choice when suture repair is difficult.

Medial meniscal repair in stable knees: Survival rate and risk factors for failure at a minimum of 5 years

IntroductionThe menisci play a major role in the protection of the knee against osteoarthritis. A medial meniscus (MM) tear occurring in a stable knee is more at risk of repair failure than a suture concomitant with reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. HypothesisThe survival of MM sutures in stable knees depends on the type of lesion. Materials and methodsThis retrospective study was carried out as part of the 2022 Francophone Arthroscopy Society's symposium, across 10 centers (Bordeaux-Mérignac, Caen, Lille, Lille Louvière, Lyon, Marseille, Toulouse, Saint-Étienne, Strasbourg and Versailles) including medial meniscus sutures in stable knees performed before the end of 2017 (minimum 5 years of follow-up) with a collection of demographic, imaging, suture and postoperative protocol data, and a functional evaluation using the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome score (KOOS). The aim of this study was to analyze the medial meniscus sutures in stable knees and to evaluate their survival and their risk factors for failure according to the type of lesion; failure being defined by the use of a meniscectomy. ResultsThree-hundred and sixty-seven MM sutures, including 122 bucket-handle tears, were included. The KOOS score was improved by the meniscal suture by an average of 22.2 points for each sub-score (p<0.05), with an improvement, which was more marked for the bucket-handle tears. The failure rate, defined by revision surgery by meniscectomy, was 33% on average (42% for bucket-handles tears, 26% for others). The probability of survival was reduced for bucket-handle tears (62% at 5 years versus 77% for the other types). For all lesions, the main risk factor identified for failure was immediate weight-bearing [OR=3.6 (1.62; 7.98), p=0.0016]. Smoking was a failure risk factor for bucket-handle tears [OR=5.76 (1.81; 18.35), p=0.003]. ConclusionMM sutures in stable knees improve knee function but present a different risk of failure depending on the type of lesion treated with a higher risk of failure for bucket-handle tears with the need for caution to be applied with regards to weight-bearing and smoking. Level of evidenceIV; retrospective series.

Efficacy of meniscus suture absorbability on meniscus healing success rate via second-look arthroscopy after meniscal repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BackgroundTo preserve the meniscus’s function, repairing the torn meniscus has become a common understanding. After which, the search for the ideal suture material is continuous. However, it is still controversial about the efficacy of suture absorbability on meniscus healing.MethodsThis review is designed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Inclusion criteria: (1) Studies on meniscus repair; (2) Second-look arthroscopy was performed; (3) The meniscus was repaired by absorbable and non-absorbable sutures; (4) The healing condition of repaired meniscus via second-look arthroscopy was described. Exclusion criteria: (1) Animal studies, cadaveric studies, or in vitro research; (2) Meniscus transplantation; (3) Open meniscus repair; (4) Reviews, meta-analysis, case reports, letters, and comments; (5) non-English studies. MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Database were searched up to October 2022. Risk of bias and methodology quality of included literature were assessed according to ROBINS-I and the modified Coleman Methodological Scale (MCMS). Descriptive analysis was performed, and meta-analysis was completed by RevMan5.4.1.ResultsFour studies were included in the systematic review. Among them, three studies were brought into the meta-analysis, including 1 cohort study and 2 case series studies about 130 patients with meniscal tears combined with anterior cruciate ligament injury. Forty-two cases were repaired by absorbable sutures, and 88 were repaired by non-absorbable sutures. Using the fixed effect model, there was a statistical difference in the healing success rate between the absorbable and the non-absorbable groups [RR1.20, 95%CI (1.03, 1.40)].ConclusionIn early and limited studies, insufficient evidence supports that non-absorbable sutures in meniscus repair surgery could improve meniscal healing success rate under second-look arthroscopy compared with absorbable sutures. In contrast, available data suggest that absorbable sutures have an advantage in meniscal healing.Trial registrationThe review was registered in the PROSPERO System Review International Pre-Registration System (Registration number CRD42021283739).