Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography Research Articles

Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography Oncological Applications beyond Prostate Cancer in Comparison to Other Radiopharmaceuticals

Background: Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) is a type II transmembrane glycoprotein overexpressed on the surface of tumor cells in most of the patients affected by prostate adenocarcinoma (PCa). However, PSMA expression has also been demonstrated in the endothelial cells of newly formed vessels of various solid tumors, suggesting a role for PSMA in neoangiogenesis. In this scenario, gallium-68 (68Ga) or fluoro-18 (18F)-labeled PSMA positron emission tomography (PET) may play a role in tumors other than PCa, generally evaluated employing other radiopharmaceuticals targeting different pathways. This review aims to investigate the detection rate of PSMA-PET compared to other radiopharmaceuticals (especially [18F]FDG) in non-prostate tumors to identify patients who may benefit from the use of such a theragnostic agent. Methods: We performed a bibliographic search on three different databases until February 2024 using the following terms: “positron emission tomography”, “PET”, “PET/CT”, “Prostate-specific membrane antigen”, “PSMA”, “non-prostate”, “not prostate cancer”, “solid tumor”, “FDG”, “Fluorodeoxyglucose”, “FAPi”, “FET”, “MET”, “DOPA”, “choline”, “FCH”, “FES”, “DOTATOC”, “DOTANOC”, and “DOTATATE”. Only original articles edited in English with at least 10 patients were included. Results: Out of a total of 120 articles, only 25 original articles comparing PSMA with other radiotracers were included in this study. The main evidence was demonstrated in renal cell carcinoma, where PSMA showed a higher detection rate compared to [18F]FDG PET/CT, with implications for patient management. PSMA PET may also improve the assessment of other entities, such as gliomas, in defining regions of early neoangiogenesis. Further data are needed to evaluate the potential role of PSMA-PET in triple-negative breast cancer as a novel therapeutic vascular target. Finally, unclear applications of PSMA-PET include thyroid and gastrointestinal tumors. Conclusions: The present review shows the potential use of PSMA-labeled PET/CT in solid tumors beyond PCa, underlining its value over other radiopharmaceuticals (mainly [18F]FDG). Prospective clinical trials with larger sample sizes are crucial to further investigate these possible clinical applications.

Predictors of Metastasis in 68GA-Prostate Specific Membrane Antigen Pet-CT in the Primary Staging of Prostate Cancer

Background: The objective of this study was to investigate factors influencing Gallium 68 Prostate Specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography (Ga68 PSMA PET-CT) uptake for primary staging in prostate cancer. Methods: Retrospective analysis was conducted on 499 non-metastatic and 243 de novo metastatic prostate cancer cases undergoing Ga68 PSMA PET-CT. Demographic, clinical, and imaging data were collected and analyzed. Multivariate logistic regression determined independent risk factors for metastasis detection on Ga68 PSMA PET-CT. Results: Metastatic cases showed higher levels of total PSA, PSA density (dPSA) and biopsy ISUP grade group compared to non-metastatic cases. Multivariate analysis identified cT2 stage and dPSA as independent predictors of metastasis detection on Ga68 PSMA PET-CT. Conclusions: Ga68 PSMA PET-CT plays a crucial role in prostate cancer staging, with identified factors such as clinical T stage and dPSA significantly impacting its diagnostic accuracy. These findings underscore the importance of Ga68 PSMA PET-CT in refining clinical staging and guiding treatment decisions for prostate cancer patients.

A Comparison of Globally Applied Prognostic Risk Groups and the Prevalence of Metastatic Disease on Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Prostate Cancer

BackgroundVarious risk classification systems (RCSs) are used globally to stratify newly diagnosed patients with prostate cancer (PCa) into prognostic groups. ObjectiveTo compare the predictive value of different prognostic subgroups (low-, intermediate-, and high-risk disease) within the RCSs for detecting metastatic disease on prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) for primary staging, and to assess whether further subdivision of subgroups would be beneficial. Design, setting, and participantsPatients with newly diagnosed PCa, in whom PSMA-PET/CT was performed between 2017 and 2022, were studied retrospectively. Patients were stratified into risk groups based on four RCSs: European Association of Urology, National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN), Cambridge Prognostic Group (CPG), and Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment. Outcome measurements and statistical analysisThe prevalence of metastatic disease on PSMA-PET/CT was compared among the subgroups within the four RCSs. Results and limitationsIn total, 2630 men with newly diagnosed PCa were studied. Any metastatic disease was observed in 35% (931/2630) of patients. Among patients classified as having intermediate- and high-risk disease, the prevalence of metastases ranged from approximately 12% to 46%. Two RCSs further subdivided these groups. According to the NCCN, metastatic disease was observed in 5.8%, 13%, 22%, and 62% for favorable intermediate-, unfavorable intermediate-, high-, and very-high-risk PCa, respectively. Regarding the CPG, these values were 6.9%, 13%, 21%, and 60% for the corresponding risk groups. ConclusionsThis study underlines the importance of nuanced risk stratification, recommending the further subdivision of intermediate- and high-risk disease given the notable variation in the prevalence of metastatic disease. PSMA-PET/CT for primary staging should be reserved for patients with unfavorable intermediate- or higher-risk disease. Patient summaryThe use of various risk classification systems in patients with prostate cancer helps identify those at a higher risk of having metastatic disease on prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography for primary staging.

Added Value of [18F]PSMA-1007 PET/CT and PET/MRI in Patients With Biochemically Recurrent Prostate Cancer: Impact on Detection Rates and Clinical Management.

Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (PET) can change management in a large fraction of patients with biochemically recurrent prostate cancer (BCR). To investigate the added value of PET to MRI and CT for this patient group, and to explore whether the choice of the PET paired modality (PET/MRI vs. PET/CT) impacts detection rates and clinical management. Retrospective. 41 patients with BCR (median age [range]: 68 [55-78]). 3T, including T1-weighted gradient echo (GRE), T2-weighted turbo spin echo (TSE) and dynamic contrast-enhanced GRE sequences, diffusion-weighted echo-planar imaging, and a T1-weighted TSE spine sequence. In addition to MRI, [18F]PSMA-1007 PET and low-dose CT were acquired on the same day. Images were reported using a five-point Likert scale by two teams each consisting of a radiologist and a nuclear medicine physician. The radiologist performed a reading using CT and MRI data and a joint reading between radiologist and nuclear medicine physician was performed using MRI, CT, and PET from either PET/MRI or PET/CT. Findings were presented to an oncologist to create intended treatment plans. Intrareader and interreader agreement analysis was performed. McNemar test, Cohen's κ, and intraclass correlation coefficients. A P-value <0.05 was considered significant. 7 patients had positive findings on MRI and CT, 22 patients on joint reading with PET/CT, and 18 patients joint reading with PET/MRI. For overall positivity, interreader agreement was poor for MR and CT (κ = 0.36) and almost perfect with addition of PET (PET/CT κ = 0.85, PET/MRI κ = 0.85). The addition of PET from PET/CT and PET/MRI changed intended treatment in 20 and 18 patients, respectively. Between joint readings, intended treatment was different for eight patients. The addition of [18F]PSMA-1007 PET/MRI or PET/CT to MRI and CT may increase detection rates, could reduce interreader variability, and may change intended treatment in half of patients with BCR. 3 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 3.

Heterogeneous PSMA ligand uptake inside parotid glands

The purpose of this investigation is to quantify the spatial heterogeneity of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (PET) uptake within parotid glands. We aim to quantify patterns in well-defined regions to facilitate further investigations. Furthermore, we investigate whether uptake is correlated with computed tomography (CT) texture features. Methods: Parotid glands from [18F]DCFPyL PSMA PET/CT images of 30 prostate cancer patients were analyzed. Uptake patterns were assessed with various segmentation schemes. Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient was calculated between PSMA PET uptake and feature values of a Grey Level Run Length Matrix using a long and short run length emphasis (GLRLML and GLRLMS) in subregions of the parotid gland. Results: PSMA PET uptake was significantly higher (p < 0.001) in lateral/posterior regions of the glands than anterior/medial regions. Maximum uptake was found in the lateral half of parotid glands in 50 out of 60 glands. The difference in SUVmean between parotid halves is greatest when parotids are divided by a plane separating the anterior/medial and posterior/lateral halves symmetrically (out of 120 bisections tested). PSMA PET uptake was significantly correlated with CT GLRLML (p < 0.001), and anti-correlated with CT GLRLMS (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Uptake of PSMA PET is heterogeneous within parotid glands, with uptake biased towards lateral/posterior regions. Uptake within parotid glands was strongly correlated with CT texture feature maps.

Prognostic impact of prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography (PSMA PET) staging for clinically node-positive prostate cancer.

In the current American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system, patients with pelvic nodal metastases are considered stage IV prostate cancer. This study aims to investigate whether men with prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography (PSMA PET)-detected pelvic node-positive prostate cancer at diagnosis have a better outcome compared to men with node-positive disease identified on conventional imaging. This is a retrospective cohort study comparing the outcomes of men with node-positive prostate cancer and disease confined to the pelvis, staged with conventional versus PSMA PET imaging. Men had to be treated definitively with a combination of androgen deprivation therapy and radiation treatment to the prostate and pelvic lymph nodes. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analysis was used to compare biochemical failure-free survival (BFFS) and overall survival (OS). Seventy-six men with nodal metastases confined to the pelvis were identified. Fifty-one were detected with PSMA PET while 25 were staged with conventional imaging. PSMA PET staged patients had a lower proportion of Gleason 8-10 disease (78% vs. 96%) as well as a lower median prostate-specific antigen (11 ng/mL vs. 26 ng/mL). BFFS at 4 years was 72% with PSMA PET-detected node-positive disease vs. 38% with conventionally detected node-positive disease. Four-year OS was 93% with PSMA PET staged patients vs. 76% with conventionally staged patients. On multivariate analysis, the PSMA PET staged group was associated with improved BFFS (Adjusted HR = 3.00, 95% CI 1.43, 6.29, P = 0.004) and OS (Adjusted HR = 5.81, 95% CI 1.43, 23.7, P = 0.007). Men with PSMA PET-detected node-positive prostate cancer confined to the pelvis have significantly better biochemical control and survival compared to those with node-positive pelvic disease identified through conventional staging.

Association of Pre-Treatment Serum Testosterone Levels with Prostate Cancer: A Prospective Study

Introduction: It has been widely accepted that prostate cancer (PCa) growth is related to serum testosterone (ST). A direct correlation between pre-treatment ST level and PCa growth and progression has been reported. However, recent studies have shown that pre-treatment ST levels have a negative correlation with PCa. Thus, the literature is, at best, conflicting. In this study, we examined the pre-treatment serum total testosterone (ST) levels in PCa. Methods: In this prospective observational study, suspected cases of PCa underwent digital rectal examination, routine blood investigation, Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) measurement, and prostate biopsy. Diagnosed cases of PCa without any risk factors affecting testosterone levels were included. Their pre-treatment total ST levels were measured. All patients underwent staging evaluation with either Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) &amp; Bone scan or Ga-68 Prostate Specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography (PSMA PET). ST levels were also measured in patients with Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH) and compared with those in PCa patients. ST levels were also assessed according to Gleason Score (GS) and clinical stage in PCa. Results: 110 cases and 54 patients with BPH were included in the study. The median ST level in PCa patients was significantly lower as compared to BPH patients [352.28 ng/dL (Interquartile Range (IQR) 224.99-563.17) vs. 448.29 ng/dL (IQR 400.97-596.42) (p =0.004)]. The median ST level in metastatic PCa was significantly lower than the localized PCa group [298.20 ng/dL vs. 452.30 ng/dL (p=0.0001)]. Moreover, the median ST level was also significantly lower in patients with Gleason Score ≥ 8 than those with Gleason Score ≤ 7 [285.92 ng/dL (149.97-560.40) vs. 425.13 ng/dL (320.43-571.46) (p=0.002)]. Conclusion: This study shows lower ST levels in patients with PCa compared to patients with BPH, thus supporting a potential association as described in previous studies. ST levels may have prognostic value since a low pre-treatment ST level is associated with a higher clinical stage and aggressive PCa.

Neural blind deconvolution for deblurring and supersampling PSMA PET.

Objective. To simultaneously deblur and supersample prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (PET) images using neural blind deconvolution.Approach. Blind deconvolution is a method of estimating the hypothetical 'deblurred' image along with the blur kernel (related to the point spread function) simultaneously. Traditionalmaximum a posterioriblind deconvolution methods require stringent assumptions and suffer from convergence to a trivial solution. A method of modelling the deblurred image and kernel with independent neural networks, called 'neural blind deconvolution' had demonstrated success for deblurring 2D natural images in 2020. In this work, we adapt neural blind deconvolution to deblur PSMA PET images while simultaneous supersampling to double the original resolution. We compare this methodology with several interpolation methods in terms of resultant blind image quality metrics and test the model's ability to predict accurate kernels by re-running the model after applying artificial 'pseudokernels' to deblurred images. The methodology was tested on a retrospective set of 30 prostate patients as well as phantom images containing spherical lesions of various volumes.Main results. Neural blind deconvolution led to improvements in image quality over other interpolation methods in terms of blind image quality metrics, recovery coefficients, and visual assessment. Predicted kernels were similar between patients, and the model accurately predicted several artificially-applied pseudokernels. Localization of activity in phantom spheres was improved after deblurring, allowing small lesions to be more accurately defined.Significance. The intrinsically low spatial resolution of PSMA PET leads to partial volume effects (PVEs) which negatively impact uptake quantification in small regions. The proposed method can be used to mitigate this issue, and can be straightforwardly adapted for other imaging modalities.

Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen PET Response Associates with Metastasis-Free Survival After Stereotactic Ablative Radiation in Oligometastatic Prostate Cancer

PurposeEmerging data suggest metastasis-directed therapy (MDT) improves outcomes in patients with oligometastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (omCSPC). Prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography (PSMA-PET) can detect occult metastatic disease and has been proposed as a biomarker for treatment response. Herein we identify and validate a PSMA-PET biomarker for metastasis-free survival (MFS) following MDT in omCSPC. Methods and materialsWe performed an international multi-institutional retrospective study of patients with omCSPC, defined as ≤3 lesions, treated with metastasis-directed stereotactic ablative radiation therapy who underwent PSMA-PET/CT prior to and after (median 6.2 months, range 2.4-10.9 months) treatment. Pre- and post-MDT PSMA-PET/CT SUVmax was measured for all lesions and PSMA response was defined as percent change in SUVmax of the least responsive lesion. PSMA response was evaluated as both a continuous variable and dichotomized as PSMA responders with a complete/partial response (at least 30% reduction in SUVmax) and PSMA non-responders with stable/progressive disease (less than a 30% reduction in SUVmax). PSMA response was correlated conventional imaging defined metastasis-free survival (MFS) with Kaplan-Meier and cox regression. ResultsA total of 131 patients with 261 treated metastases were included in the analysis, with median follow-up of 29 months (IQR 18.5-41.3). Following SABR, 70.2% of patients were classified as PSMA responders. Multivariable analysis demonstrated PSMA response as a continuous variable was associated with significantly worse MFS (HR=1.003, 95%CI 1.001-1.006; p=0.016). Patients classified as PSMA responders were found to have significantly improved median MFS of 39.9 vs 12 months (p=0.001) compared to PSMA non-responders. Our study is limited as it is a retrospective review of a heterogenous population. ConclusionsFollowing SABR, PSMA-PET response appears to be a radiographic biomarker that correlates with MFS in omCSPC. This approach holds promise for guiding clinical management of omCSPC and should be validated in a prospective setting.

Abstract 4150: Development of a three-dimensional spatialomics map of lethal prostate cancer driven by clinical imaging

Abstract Prostate adenocarcinoma (PCa) is the most common malignancy and the second leading cause of cancer-related mortality in United States men. Following treatment for localized PCa, up to 50% of these men can experience disease recurrence, with subsequent metastasis and death. This indicates that there is suboptimal identification of lethal PCa at the time of diagnosis, despite advancements in imaging, genomics, and biomarkers. To improve the noninvasive diagnosis of lethal PCa at initial diagnosis, we have developed a novel magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) method, diffusion basis spectrum imaging (DBSI), that noninvasively measures cancer, stromal, and immune cell contributions to the prostate tumor microenvironment (TME). To validate DBSI for PCa, we have applied novel technologies to matched prostatectomy specimens that include (i) fully automated tissue section processing with serial 2-photon tomographic (STP) imaging of the sections to generate 3D volumetric structural maps of the tumor tissue and (ii) multiplex MALDI mass spectrometry imaging of untargeted glycans and extracellular matrix (ECM) peptides and of proteins targeted with novel photocleavable-mass-tagged antibodies (MALDI-IHC) to spatially resolve hundreds of biomolecules from the TME. To establish the feasibility of this approach, we recruited a patient with an unusually aggressive prostate cancer consisting of Gleason 5+4 acinar adenocarcinoma histology with intraductal growth that was locally invasive and lymph node positive at prostatectomy (stage T3bN1). This patient also had the unusual finding of low activity on prostate specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography (PSMA-PET). Following gross sectioning of the prostate with MRI-guided 3D printed molds to co-register clinical DBSI with histology, a 5-mm thick tissue cross-section containing tumor and normal prostate was imaged with high resolution ex vivo DBSI followed by 3D structural mapping with STP imaging. Selected slides in the 3D stack were subject to multiplexed MALDI imaging to identify relationships between cellular and molecular heterogeneity with tumor structure identified with DBSI and STP imaging. We discovered unique structural differences in the prostate tumor compared with the surrounding stroma based upon collagen and glycan modifications to the ECM that were recapitulated with second harmonic maps of collagen from STP imaging as well as stromal maps generated from DBSI imaging. Additional novel protein and glycan ECM components were expressed in this tumor known to be associated with poor patient outcomes. Together, these data represent the first evidence successfully linking noninvasive in vivo clinical imaging and de novo spatialomics technologies with potential to improve PCa diagnostics. This advanced imaging workflow can be applied to any tissue type, underscoring its relevance to translational cancer research. Citation Format: Joseph E. Ippolito, David H. Ballard, Karla Bergeron, Ritesh Chidambaram, Anusha Elumalai, Tyler J. Fraum, Huaping Jing, Peter Kamelin, Eric H. Kim, Catherine Kita, Aleksandra Klim, Anthony Knesis, Mark Lim, José Marcio Luna, Hani Nakhoul, Timothy Ragan, Kenneth J. Rothschild, Sheng-Kwei Song, Kainen Utt, Cody Weimholt, Gargey Yagnik, Elijah Yew, Peggi M. Angel, Richard R. Drake. Development of a three-dimensional spatialomics map of lethal prostate cancer driven by clinical imaging [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(6_Suppl):Abstract nr 4150.

Head-to-head comparison of prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in the detection of biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Our main goal of this meta-analytical analysis was to evaluate the diagnostic effectiveness of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) against multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) in the context of identifying biochemical recurrence in patients with prostate cancer (PCa). A thorough search covering articles published until March 2023 was carried out across major databases such as PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science. Studies examining the direct comparison of PSMA PET/CT and mpMRI in patients with PCa suffering biochemical recurrence were included in the inclusion criteria. Using the renowned Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Performance Studies-2 technique, each study's methodological rigor was assessed. We analyzed data from six eligible studies involving 290 patients in total. The combined data showed that for PSMA PET/CT and mpMRI, respectively, the pooled overall detection rates for recurrent PCa after definitive treatment were 0.69 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.45-0.89) and 0.70 (95% CI: 0.44-0.91). The detection rates for local recurrence were specifically 0.52 (95% CI: 0.39-0.65) and 0.62 (95% CI: 0.31-0.89), while they were 0.50 (95% CI: 0.26-0.74) and 0.32 (95% CI: 0.18-0.48) for lymph node metastasis. Notably, there was no discernible difference between the two imaging modalities in terms of the overall detection rate (P = 0.95). The detection rates for local recurrence and lymph node metastasis did not differ statistically significantly (P = 0.55, 0.23). The performance of PSMA PET/CT and mpMRI in identifying biochemical recurrence in PCa appears to be comparable. However, the meta-analysis' findings came from research with modest sample sizes. In this context, more extensive research should be conducted in the future.

THE DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY OF A COMBINATION OF PREOPERATIVE 68-Ga PSMA PET/CT AND MULTIPARAMETRİC MRI IN LOCALIZED PROSTATE CANCER.

Prostate cancer (PCa) is a common and leading course of cancer-related death in men. Although there are studies on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MpMRI) with good diagnostic results in detecting clinically significant prostate cancer, new methods have been investigated due to the low positive predictive values. In this context, Prostate Specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography (PSMA PET) emerges as an alternative imaging method to MpMRI. This study aims to compare 68Ga PSMA I&T-PET/CT and MpMRI in determining tumor location. Preoperative MpMRI and 68Ga PSMA I&T-PET/CT scans and pathology specimens of who underwent radical prostatectomy for PCa at our clinic between 2018-2021 were retrospectively evaluated. PSMA I&T-PET/CT, MpMRI, combined imaging were compared for tumor localization according to histopathological data. In terms of tumor localization, MpMRI demonstrated overall accuracy rates 75.9% (p kappa (κ) 0.0001* (0.525)). 68Ga PSMA I&T-PET/CT showed 71.5% (p κ 0.0001* (0.438)). For the combined imaging approach overall accuracy rate were calculated as 79.2% (p κ 0.0001* (0.576)). Additionally, high diagnostic accuracy was achieved for the combined imaging approach, particularly in the intermediate ISUP group. Moreover, SUVmax was calculated as 6.37. The combined use of 68Ga PSMA I&T-PET/CT and MpMRI has high diagnostic rates. However, the high cost is a significant disadvantage that limits their routine combined use.

The Role of PSMA PET Imaging in the Classification of the Risk of Prostate Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review on the Insights to Guide an Active Surveillance Approach.

active surveillance (AS) is a suitable strategy for patients with prostate cancer (PCa). Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (PET) imaging is an established tool used to assess PCa. The aim of this review was to evaluate the role of PSMA imaging to guide correct risk-based classification and the AS approach in PCa patients. The Scopus, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and PubMed/MEDLINE databases were screened to find relevant published articles. 1774 articles were revealed with the literature search. A total of 1764 articles were excluded after applying exclusion criteria (data not within the field of interest, preclinical papers, conference proceedings, reviews, or editorials). Ten studies were finally included in the review, revealing that PSMA PET could have the ability to guide risk-based classification of PCa and the choice of AS, and to guide the execution of biopsies for the research of high-grade PCa, therefore precluding AS. this systematic review underlined a possible role of PSMA PET imaging in patients with PCa by correctly re-classifying them on the basis of their risk and guiding AS.

A Phase II Study of Rucaparib Monotherapy in Nonmetastatic, Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer Demonstrating "BRCAness" Genotype (ROAR).

Both germline and somatic BReast CAncer gene (BRCA) mutations are poor prognostic markers in men with localized or metastatic prostate cancer. For instance, men with these mutations often are diagnosed with prostate cancer earlier and develop metastatic disease earlier compared with those who do not harbor similar mutations. Patients with germline alterations typically have more advanced disease and shorter overall survival (Castro E, Goh C, Olmos D, et al. Germline BRCA mutations are associated with higher risk of nodal involvement, distant metastasis, and poor survival outcomes in prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31(14):1748-1757. doi:10.1200/JCO.2012.43.1882). The risk of disease progression to metastatic disease is significant in patients with this genotype of prostate cancer. The percentage of patients free from metastatic disease was 90%, 72%, and 50%, respectively, compared with 97%, 94%, and 84% at 3, 5, and 10 years for patients with intact DNA repair (P < .001) (Castro E, Goh C, Leongamornlert D, et al. Effect of BRCA mutations on metastatic relapse and cause-specific survival after radical treatment for localised prostate cancer. Eur Urol. 2015;68(2):186-193. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.10.022). DNA damage repair non-BRCA mutations include alterations in genes such as ATM, CHEK2, PALB2, and RAD51. While less common than BRCA mutations, they have emerged as significant prognostic markers in prostate cancer. These BRCAness mutations are associated with a higher risk of aggressive disease and poorer survival outcomes. Given the debilitating physical and psychological side effects of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) in relatively younger men with prostate cancer, delaying ADT in these men may be an attractive strategy. Given the proven efficacy of polyadenosine diphosphate-ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors in the castration-resistant prostate cancersetting, PARP inhibitor monotherapy in a nonmetastatic castration-sensitive (nmCSPC) setting has the potential to delay metastasis and delay the onset of ADT related symptoms. This is a single-arm, single-center, open-label, phase II trial to assess the efficacy of rucaparib in patients with high-risk biochemically recurrent (BCR) nmHSPC, which was defined as PSA doubling time of <9 months, demonstrating a "BRCAness" genotype (BRCA1/2 and other homologous recombination repair mutations). A total of 15 patients were intended to be enrolled, with an expected enrollment duration of 12 months. Patients were given rucaparib 600 mg orally twice daily and were allowed to remain on study treatment until PSA progression defined by Prostate Cancer Working Group 3, with 2 years of follow-up after study treatment. We anticipated a total of 2-3 years until completion of the clinical trial. The primary endpoint was to assess the PSA progression-free survival (PSA-PFS). The secondary endpoints of the study were safety, the proportion of patients with a PSA 50% response (PSA 50), and an undetectable PSA. A 4-week treatment duration comprised one cycle. The study started enrolling in June 2019 and was prematurely terminated in June 2022 after the accrual of 7 patients because of changing standard of care treatments with the introduction of next-generation scans, eg, prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography (PSMA-PET). Seven patients were enrolled in the study with the following pathogenic alterations: ATM (n = 3), BRCA2 (n = 2), BRCA1 (n = 1), BRIP1 (n = 1), and RAD51 (n = 1). The median duration of follow-up was 18 months. A median of 20 cycles (range 4-42) was completed, median PSA-PFS was 35.37 months (95% CI, 0-85.11 months). In total, 2 patients achieved PSA50; both also achieved nadir PSA as undetectable. Grade ≥ 3 adverse events (AEs) were anemia and rash (in 1 patient each). No dose-limiting toxicities or severe AEs were seen. Rucaparib demonstrated acceptable toxicity and efficacy signal as an ADT-sparing approach in patients with biochemically recurrent nonmetastatic prostate cancer. It is currently challenging to understand the optimal value of systemic therapy in this disease setting due to the rapidly changing standard of care. Additionally, there are relatively few patients with BRCAness who present with nonmetastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03533946).

A multidisciplinary approach to address unmet needs in the management of patients with non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.

With the availability of second-generation androgen receptor inhibitors (SGARIs), the treatment landscape has changed dramatically for patients with nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC). In clinical trials, the SGARIs (apalutamide, enzalutamide, darolutamide) increased metastasis-free survival (MFS), overall survival (OS), and patient quality of life compared to placebo. These drugs were subsequently integrated into nmCRPC clinical practice guidelines. With advances in radiographic imaging, disease assessment, and patient monitoring, nmCRPC strategies are evolving to address limitations related to tracking disease progression using prostate-specific antigen (PSA) kinetics. A panel of 10 multidisciplinary experts in prostate cancer conducted reviews and discussions of unmet needs in the management and monitoring of patients with nmCRPC in order to develop consensus recommendations. Across the SGARI literature, patient MFS and OS are generally comparable for all treatments, but important distinctions exist regarding short- and long-term drug safety profiles and drug-drug interactions. With respect to disease monitoring, a substantial proportion of patients using SGARIs may experience disease progression without rising PSA levels, suggesting a need for enhanced radiographic imaging in addition to PSA monitoring. Recent data also indicate that novel prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography radiotracers provide enhanced accuracy for disease detection, as compared to conventional imaging. Clinical decision-making in nmCRPC has become more complex, with new opportunities to apply precision medicine to patient care. Multidisciplinary teams can ensure that patients with nmCRPC receive optimal and individualized disease management.

A comparison study of 68gallium-prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography-computed tomography and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for locoregional staging of prostate cancer.

Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most common malignancy in men aged 50 years and older and the second cause of cancer death among men. Accurate staging of PCa preoperatively is of high importance for treatment decisions and patient management. Conventional imaging modalities (ultrasound, computed tomography [CT], and magnetic resonance imaging) are inaccurate for the staging of PCa. Newer modality multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) and prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (PET) scan show promising results for the staging of PCa. Only fewer studies are available for comparison of these modalities with histopathology as reference. The objective of our study is to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of independent 68gallium PSMA (68Ga-PSMA) PET-CT compared with mpMRI for preoperative staging of PCa, using histopathology as the reference standard. From August 2021 to December 2022, 30 patients of biopsy-proven PCa were prospectively enrolled as per eligibility criteria. Preoperatively, 68Ga-PSMA PET scan and mpMRI were done in all the patients. Extracapsular extension (ECE), seminal vesicle invasion (SVI), and lymph node metastasis (LNM) were investigated separately. Subsequently, the patients underwent robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy with bilateral pelvic lymph node dissection. mpMRI prostate was more sensitive (66.66%) but less specific than PSMA PET-CT (55.55%) for ECE. mpMRI and PSMA PET-CT both had similar sensitivity (83.3%) and specificity (87.5%) for SVI. PSMA PET-CT was more sensitive (85.71%) and specific (95.6%) than mpMRI prostate (62.5% and 91.30%, respectively) for LNM. PSMA PET-CT is more specific for the detection of ECE and more sensitive and specific for the detection of LNM than mpMRI, and similar for the detection of SVI. mpMRI provides only local staging, while PSMA PET-CT provides information about local, regional, and distal staging. Overall, PSMA PET-CT is superior to mpMRI for locoregional staging of PCa.

Diagnostic performance of 18F‑DCFPyL PET vs. 68Ga‑PSMA PET/CT in patients with suspected prostate cancer: A systemic review and meta‑analysis.

In this systematic review and meta-analysis, the diagnostic performance of 68Ga-prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (PET)/CT was compared with that of 18F-DCFPyL PET for patients with suspected prostate cancer (PCa). Up to September 2023, the PubMed, Embase and Web of Science databases were thoroughly searched for relevant papers. Studies examining the diagnostic performance of 18F-DCFPyL PET and 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT in patients with suspected PCa were included in the present review. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Performance Studies-2 tool was used to rate the diagnostic performance of each study. The diagnostic performance of 18F-DCFPyL PET and 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT for primary PCa was examined by 13 studies included, comprising 1,178 patients. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of 18F-DCFPyL PET were 0.92 (95% CI, 0.85-0.96) and 0.59 (95% CI, 0.08-0.96), respectively. For 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT, the pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.96 (95% CI, 0.88-0.99) and 0.71 (95% CI, 0.57-0.82), respectively. 18F-DCFPyL PET and 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT both had an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.92 (95% CI, 0.89-0.94). In addition, the Fagan nomogram revealed that the post-test probabilities for 18F-DCFPyL PET and 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT could rise to 69 and 77% when the pre-test probability was set at 50%. In conclusion, a comparable diagnostic performance for patients with suspected PCa was determined for 18F-DCFPyL PET and 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT. However, it is crucial to keep in mind that the findings of the present meta-analysis come from investigations with modest sample sizes. Therefore, more extensive research is required to obtain more solid data.

Predictive value of volumetric parameters based on 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT for prostate cancer metastasis.

To explore the value of 18F-labeled prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA-1007) positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT), the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) of the primary tumor, prostate PSMA-tumor volume (PSMA-TVp), and prostate total lesion PSMA (TL-PSMAp) for predicting prostate cancer (PCa) metastasis and follow-up evaluation in primary PCa lesions. 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT data of 110 consecutive newly diagnosed PCa patients were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into non-metastatic, oligometastatic, and extensive metastatic groups. The predictive power was assessed using the receiver operating characteristic curve. Multi-group one-way analysis of variance and post-hoc tests were used to compare the groups. Patients were monitored post-therapy to evaluate treatment effectiveness. Among the 110 patients, 66.4% (73) had metastasis (29 oligometastatic, 44 extensive metastasis). AUCs for Gleason score (GS), total prostate-specific antigen(TPSA), SUVmax, TL-PSMAp, and PSMA-TVp were 0.851, 0.916, 0.834, 0.938, and 0.923, respectively. GS, TPSA, SUVmax, TL-PSMAp, and PSMA-TVp were significantly different among the groups. In the post-hoc tests, differences in GS, TPSA, SUVmax, TL-PSMAp, and PSMA-TVp between the non-metastatic and oligometastatic groups and non-metastatic and extensive metastatic groups were significant (P<0.010). Differences in TL-PSMAp and PSMA-TVp between oligometastatic and extensive metastatic groups were significant (P=0.039 and 0.015, respectively), while those among GS, TPSA, and SUVmax were not. TL-PSMAp and PSMA-TVp distinguished between oligometastatic and extensive metastases, but GS, TPSA, and SUVmax did not. In individuals with oligometastasis, the implementation of active treatment for both primary and metastatic lesions may result in a more favorable prognosis. 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT volumetric parameters PSMA-TVp and TL-PSMAp can predict PCa oligometastasis.

Metastasis-directed therapy in prostate cancer

Metastasis-directed therapy (MDT) in oligometastatic prostate cancer (omHSPC) is playing an increasingly important role in therapy with the aim of delaying disease progression, the start of systemic treatment or switching systemic treatment to improve the patient's overall prognosis. Molecular imaging as prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography (PSMA-PET) imaging allows metastases to be detected with ahigher sensitivity and specificity. This means that they can be detected early and made accessible for treatment. The standard therapy for oligo-mHSPC is androgen deprivation (ADT), which is supplemented by novel hormonal therapeutics (NHT). Afew small prospective trials have shown an extension of the ADT-free interval and progression-free survival (PFS), particularly in metachronous oligo-mHSPC, by MDT, usually radiotherapy. Additional ADT can further extend the PFS in particular. There are hardly any prospective data for synchronous oligo-mHSPC. Despite the currently still poor evidence, MDT is playing an increasingly important role. The still unclear definition of oligometastasis and the large number of influencing factors make it difficult to compare current data. Large multicenter prospective data are still pending. It is also important to clarify the effect of limited ADT in combination with NHT in the treatment of synchronous and metachronous oligo-mHSPC with MDT. In synchronous oligo-mHSPC in particular, further benefit of additional local therapy of the primary in combination with MDT should also be investigated.

Prostate-specific membrane antigen-positron emission tomography (PSMA-PET) of prostate cancer: current and emerging applications.

Prostate-specific membrane antigen-positron emission tomography (PSMA-PET) is transforming the management of patients with prostate cancer. In appropriately selected patients, PSMA-PET offers superior sensitivity and specificity compared to conventional imaging (e.g., computed tomography and bone scintigraphy) as well as choline and fluciclovine PET, with the added benefit of consolidating bone and soft tissue evaluation into a single study. Despite being a newly available imaging tool, PSMA-PET has established indications, interpretation guidelines, and reporting criteria, which will be reviewed. The prostate cancer care team, from imaging specialists to those delivering treatment, should have knowledge of physiologic PSMA radiotracer uptake, patterns of disease spread, and the strengths and limitations of PSMA-PET. In this review, current and emerging applications of PSMA-PET, including appropriateness use criteria as well as image interpretation and pitfalls, will be provided with an emphasis on clinical implications.